PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Tetrahedron Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC Feb 28, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3281747
NIHMSID: NIHMS354830
Synthesis and cross-coupling reactions of imidomethyltrifluoroborates with aryl chlorides
Rammohan Devulapally,a Nicolas Fleury-Brégeot,b Gary A. Molander,b* and Dave G. Seapya*
aDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University at Qatar, PO Box 23874, Doha, Qatar
bRoy and Diana Vagelos Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323, United States
* Corresponding authors. Tel.: +974 44230272; fax: +974 44230060 (D.G.S.). gmolandr/at/sas.upenn.edu (G.A. Molander), dave.seapy/at/qatar.tamu.edu (D.G. Seapy)
Abstract
Potassium imidomethyltrifluoroborate salts were efficiently synthesized. Potassium phthalimidomethyl-trifluoroborate was successfully used in Suzuki–Miyaura-like cross-coupling reactions with a variety of aryl chlorides.
Keywords: Potassium imidomethyltrifluoroborates, Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction, N-Benzylphthalimides
Certain imides, particularly phthalimide derivatives, are biologically active as TXA2 receptor antagonists,1a analgesics,1b anti-inflammatory agents,1c,d anticonvulsants,1e herbicides,1f insecticides,1g, and antipsychotics.1h N-Benzylphthalimides have been found to exhibit non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor activities2 and TPA induced TNF-α-production enhancing activity by human leukemia HL-60 cells.3 This large array of biological activities makes imido derivatives desirable target molecules for synthesis. In addition, N-benzylphthalimides are well known for the aminomethylation of aromatic substrates4 and have been used for the synthesis of anti HIV compounds.4a Traditional synthetic approaches to these imides have involved formation of the carbon–nitrogen bond via N-benzylation of phthalimides proceeding via SN2 reactions of benzyl halides with phthalimide (or potassium phthalimide),1a,5 or the Mitsunobu reaction6 of phthalimide and benzyl alcohols (Scheme 1, a).
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Retrosynthetic analysis.
A complementary synthetic approach can be envisaged by forming the carbon–carbon bond via a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling (Scheme 1, b). This new disconnection would provide several advantages. The first is that the Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction is an extremely versatile C–C bond forming reaction in organic synthesis.7 Traditionally, boronic acids or boronate esters are used in Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions. However, both suffer from limitations owing to the difficulty in purification, air and moisture sensitivity, and in particular the sensitivities of boronic acids to protodeboronation. As an alternative to boronic acids and boronate esters, organotrifluoroborate salts have proven to be stable and efficient coupling partners in Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions.8 We have previously reported the synthesis and use of various organotrifluoroborates in cross-coupling reactions.8b,c,9 Most recently, the synthesis and cross-coupling reactions of various functionalized organomethyltrifluoroborates such as sulfonamidomethyl, amidomethyl, ammoniomethyl, and alkoxymethyltrifluoroborates have been reported.10 Coupling reactions with these organotrifluoroborates have proven to be tolerant of a variety of embedded functional groups. A second advantage is that a much larger library of aryl chlorides (compared to benzyl chlorides) is commercially available, thus adding increased scope and diversity to potential applications of this new synthetic approach (Scheme 1, b).
Herein, we report the efficient synthesis11 of potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate (3a) and potassium succinimidomethyltrifluoroborate (3b) and a new imidomethylation procedure resulting from cross-coupling reactions of potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate with a variety of aryl chlorides.
After numerous attempts under various reaction conditions, the imidomethyltrifluoroborates 3a and 3b were optimally prepared using a synthetic route based on Mattesson’s chemistry.12 Treatment of phthalimide (1a) and succinimide (1b), respectively, with potassium hydride in the presence of bromomethylpinacolboronate (2) in THF/DMF at room temperature for 24 h gave the corresponding crude boronate esters, which were directly treated with potassium hydrogen fluoride for 1 h to afford, after isolation and purification,13 the desired potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate (3a, 60%) and potassium succinimidomethyltrifluoroborate (3b, 80%) (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Synthesis of potassium imidomethyltrifluoroborates.
After successful synthesis of potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate (3a), cross-coupling reaction conditions were screened and optimized using 4-chloroanisole (4a) as the electrophilic partner. These optimization studies involved using different catalysts, ligands (Fig. 1), bases, and solvent systems at different temperatures (Table 1). The coupling product was first observed at 100 °C using PdCl2(MeCN)2 or PdCl2(PhCN)2 as the palladium source in 40–43% conversion (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). By replacing Cs2CO3 base with K2CO3 the percent conversion increased from 40–43% to 85% (56% yield) (Table 1, entry 7). Even for a proven catalyst–ligand system, the ratio of t-BuOH/H2O in the solvent system had a profound effect on product formation (Table 1, entries 7–9). Similarly, for a proven catalyst–ligand system, changes in base (Table 1, entries 10 and 11) and/or solvent systems (Table 1, entries 12–16) had dramatic effects on the coupling reaction. For a 20 h reaction time, increasing the catalyst/ligand loading from 2.5 mol %/5 mol % to 10 mol %/20 mol % increased the conversion from 32% to 100% (Table 1, entries 17–19). Adequate amounts (3 equiv) of base were also essential for efficient coupling (Table 1, entry 20). Entries 21–28 demonstrate the significant role of ligand selection in that by varying only the ligand (Fig. 1), the percent conversions range from a trace to 77%. Ultimately, the optimized conditions resulted in 100% conversion and a 64% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 29) when using PdCl2(MeCN)2 (7.5 mol %), X-Phos (15 mol %), K2CO3, in t-BuOH/H2O (4:1) for 13 h at 100 °C. To our surprise, when trifluoroborate 3a was treated with 4-chloroanisole (4a) under these optimized reaction conditions, but substituting microwave heating for conventional heating, only a trace amount of cross-coupled product was observed. Also, the succinimidomethyltrifluoroborate (3b) when treated with 4-chloroanisole (4a) did not afford any crosscoupled product under these reaction conditions.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of the various phosphine ligands.
Table 1
Table 1
Cross-coupling of 3a with 4-chloroanisole (4a): optimization studies
These optimal conditions were then used with an array of diversely substituted aryl chlorides to explore the scope of the reaction (Table 2). The coupling products 5b–5j were formed in 36–77% yields. Functional group tolerance included methoxy, ester, ketone, and pyrrole units. In contrast, 4-chloroaniline and 2-chloro-5-methylphenol were not tolerated and yielded no cross-coupling product, presumably due to the role of the free hydroxy and amino functional groups. The yields in Table 2 indicate no clear structure-reactivity correlation with the aryl chloride variables of steric hindrance or electrophilicity. Reaction times beyond the minimum reaction time required for 100% conversion (based on TLC monitoring of the aryl chloride) often led to reduced isolated yields. This observation is consistent with product decomposition under the reaction conditions and highlights the need to avoid excessive reaction times.
Table 2
Table 2
Cross-coupling of 3a with aryl and heteroaryl chlorides
The heteroaryl chloride 4k afforded the cross-coupled product 5k in 35% yield (Table 2, entry 10). However, under the same reaction conditions, a variety of substituted pyridine, quinoline, and thiophene heteroaryl chlorides resulted in unwanted reduction of the heteroaryl chlorides, while producing only traces of the desired cross-coupling products.
Trifluoroborate 3a was shown to couple with a variety of electrophiles (Table 3). Coupling with bromobenzene and iodobenzene produced 43% and 7% yields, respectively (Table 3, entries 2 and 3). Phenyl triflate, phenyl tosylate, and phenyl mesylate afforded 36%, 31%, and 48% yields of cross-coupled products, respectively (Table 3, entries 4–6).
Table 3
Table 3
Electrophile compatibility
In summary, potassium succinimidomethyltrifluoroborate and potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate salts were successfully synthesized from succinimide and phthalimide, respectively, in moderate to good yields. As a new approach to aminomethylation methods, potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate was successfully used in Suzuki–Miyaura-like cross-coupling reactions with a variety of aryl chlorides and one heteroaryl chloride.
Supplementary Material
Supporting
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) grant from the Qatar National Research Fund (Grant No. 08-035-1-008). G.A.M. thanks the National Institute of General Medical Sciences for support.
Footnotes
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.12.062.
1. (a) Kato Y, Takemoto M, Achiwa K. Chem Pharm Bull. 1999;47:529–535. [PubMed](b) Antunes R, Batista H, Srivastava RM, Thomas G, Araujo CC. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:3071–3076. [PubMed](c) Lima LM, Castro P, Machado AL, Fraga CAM, Lugnier C, Goncalves de Moraes VL, Barreiro EJ. Bioorg Med Chem. 2002;10:3067–3073. [PubMed](d) Collin X, Robert JM, Wielgosz G, Le Baut G, Bobin-Dubigeon C, Grimaud N, Petit JY. Eur J Med Chem. 2001;36:639–649. [PubMed](e) Abdel-Hafez AA. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27:495–501. [PubMed](f) Kawaguchi S, Ikeda O. 2001328911. Jpn Pat Appl JP. 2001Chem Abstr. 2001;135:368014.(g) Ebihara K, Oora T, Nakaya M, Shiraishi S, Yasui N. 08245585. Jpn Pat Appl JP. 1996Chem Abstr. 1996;126:31266.(h) Norman MH, Minick DJ, Rigdon GC. J Med Chem. 1996;39:149–157. [PubMed]
2. Jiraporn U, Chanpen W, Chutima M, Jutarat P, Suratsawadee P. Chin J Chem. 2008;26:387–397.
3. Sasaki K, Shibata Y, Hashimoto Y, Iwasaki S. Biol Pharm Bull. 1995;18:1228–1233. [PubMed]
4. (a) Mimoto T, Kato R, Takaku H, Nojima H, Terashima K, Misawa S, Fukazawa T, Ueno T, Sato H, Shintani M, Kiso Y, Hayashi H. J Med Chem. 1999;42:1789–1802. [PubMed](b) Fichert T, Massing U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:5017–5018.(c) Kim JM, Bogdan MA, Mariano PS. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:10591–10595.(d) Osby JO, Martin MG, Ganem B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984;25:2093–2096.(e) Yang JS, Lin YD, Chang YH, Wang SS. J Org Chem. 2005;70:6066–6073. [PubMed]
5. (a) Cho SD, Kim HJ, Ahn C, Falck JR, Shin DS. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:8215–8217.(b) Pace V, Hoyos P, Fernandez M, Sinisterra JV, Alcantara AR. Green Chem. 2010;12:1380–1382.
6. Arnold LD, Assil HI, Vederas JC. J Am Chem Soc. 1989;111:3973–3976.
7. (a) Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem Rev. 1995;95:2457–2483.(b) Bellina F, Carpita A, Rossi R. Synthesis. 2004:2419–2440.(c) Martin R, Buchwald SL. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1461–1473. [PubMed]
8. For reviews, see: (a) Darses S, Genet JP Eur J Org Chem. 2003:4313–4327.(b) Molander GA, Figueroa R Aldrichim Acta. 2005;38:49–56.(c) Molander GA, Ellis N Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:275–286. [PubMed](d) Stefani HA, Cella R, Adriano S Tetrahedron. 2007;63:3623–3658.(e) Darses S, Genet JP Chem Rev. 2008;108:288–325. [PubMed]For mechanistic details of trifluoroborates in Suzuki–Miyaura reaction, see: (f) Butters M, Harvey JN, Jover J, Lennox AJJ, Lloyd-Jones GC, Murray PM Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:5156– 5160. [PubMed]
9. (a) Molander GA, Sandrock DL. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2009;12:811–823. [PMC free article] [PubMed](b) Molander GA, Canturk B. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2009;48:9240–9261. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. (a) Molander GA, Ham J. Org Lett. 2006;8:2031–2034. [PubMed](b) Molander GA, Fleury-Brégeot N, Hiebel MA. Org Lett. 2011;13:1694–1697. [PubMed](c) Hiebel MA, Molander GA. Org Lett. 2010;12:4876–4879. [PubMed](d) Molander GA, Colombel V, Braz VA. Org Lett. 2011;13:1852–1855. [PubMed](e) Molander GA, Beaumard F. Org Lett. 2011;13:1242–1245. [PubMed](f) Raushel J, Sandrock DL, Josyula KV, Pakyz D, Molander GA. J Org Chem. 2011;76:2762–2769. [PubMed](g) Molander GA, Gormisky PE, Sandrock DL. J Org Chem. 2008;73:2052–2057. [PubMed](h) Molander GA, Canturk B. Org Lett. 2008;10:2135–2138. [PubMed](i) Molander GA, Sandrock DL. Org Lett. 2007;9:1597–1600. [PubMed]
11. The synthesis of potassium phthalimidomethyltrifluoroborate was reported with only 3% yield. See: Tanaka K 2008007670. PCT Int Appl WO. 2008Chem Abstr. 2008;148:144871.
12. (a) Matteson DS. Chem Rev. 1989;89:1535–1551.(b) Matteson DS. Tetrahedron. 1989;45:1859–1885.(c) Matteson DS. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:10555–10607.
13. See the Supplementary data for complete experimental procedures.