PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Pediatr Blood Cancer. Author manuscript; available in PMC Oct 1, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3276706
NIHMSID: NIHMS323309
Initial Testing (Stage 1) of SGI-1776, a PIM1 Kinase Inhibitor, by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program
Vandana Batra, MD,1 John M. Maris, MD,1 Min H. Kang, PharmD,2 C. Patrick Reynolds, MD, PhD,2 Peter J. Houghton, PhD,3 Denise Alexander, BS,3 E. Anders Kolb, MD,4 Richard Gorlick, MD,5 Stephen T. Keir, PhD,6 Hernan Carol, PhD,7 Richard Lock, PhD,7 Catherine A. Billups, MS,8 and Malcolm A. Smith, MD, PhD9
1Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA
2Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX
3Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
4A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE
5The Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY
6Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
7Children’s Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research, Randwick, NSW, Australia
8St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
9Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, NCI, Bethesda, MD
Corresponding Author: John M. Maris, MD Hematology-Oncology Children’s Hospital Philadelphia 3615 Civic Center Blvd Philadelphia, PA 19104-4318 ; maris/at/chop.edu Voice: 215-590-2821
Abstract
The PIM kinase inhibitor, SGI-1776, was tested against the PPTP in vitro (1.0 nM to 10 μM) and in vivo panels (148 mg/kg daily x 5 days for 3 weeks). SGI-1776 exhibited cytotoxic activity in vitro with a median relative IC50 of 3.1 μM. SGI-1776 induced significant differences in EFS distribution in vivo in 9 of 31 solid tumor xenografts and in 1 of 8 of the evaluable ALL xenografts. SGI-1776 induced tumor growth inhibition meeting criteria for intermediate EFS T/C activity in 1 of 39 evaluable models. In contrast, SGI-1776 induced complete responses of subcutaneous MV4;11 (B myeloid leukemia).
Keywords: Preclinical Testing, Developmental Therapeutics, kinase inhibitors
Pim (Provirus Integration site for Moloney murine leukemia virus) proteins are highly conserved serine/threonine kinases (PIM1, PIM2 and PIM3) that are constitutively activated in a variety of hematopoietic and solid malignancies. [13] They are thought to exert an oncogenic effect primarily via regulation of Myc family protein transcriptional activity. Evidence for this comes from PIM1 transgenic mice that have been shown to develop clonal T cell lymphomas when infected with murine leukemia virus via increased myc activation due to proviral insertion near myc genes [4,5], indicating cooperation between MYC and PIM1 in lymphomagenesis [6]. Pim kinases also appear to function to suppresses apoptosis [7], modulate migration [8], inducing genomic instability via disruptions in mitotic spindle checkpoints [9], influencing angiogenesis [10] and modulating cell cycle regulation [1113].
Pim kinases are over-expressed in a variety of human cancers including CLL, mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, FLT3/ITD AML and solid tumors including prostate, pancreas and colon [14], and aberrant expression may be associated with outcome. In view of the role in cell differentiation, angiogenesis, survival and proliferation PIM kinase inhibition provides a tractable therapeutic target for several pediatric malignancies.
Unlike other kinases, PIM proteins do not posses the typical canonical hydrogen bond donor in the hinge region (due to the presence of a proline residue instead of methionine)[15,16], a typical key binding sight for many small molecules. SGI-1776 is an imidazo [1,2-b]pyridazine compound that was discovered as a potential novel inhibitor of the PIM kinases with IC50 concentrations for PIM1, PIM2 and PIM3 of 7 nM, 363 nM and 69 nM, respectively. It is relatively specific with some on target activity against FLT3 and the haspin group of kinases. SGI-1776 has shown preclinical activity against leukemia and solid tumor cell line models [16] with IC50 values of 0.005-11.68 μM. Preclinical in vivo studies with human-derived myeloid leukemia xenograft models showed that SGI- 1776 was extremely active as an orally delivered drug and induced complete tumor regression. The PPTP therefore performed preclinical testing to assess the potential activity of SGI-1776 against pediatric cancers.
In vitro testing
In vitro testing was performed using DIMSCAN, as previously described.[17] Cells were incubated in the presence of SGI-1776 for 96 hours at concentrations from 1 nM to 10 μM and analyzed as previously described [18].
In vivo tumor growth inhibition studies
Studies were conducted and analyzed using methods previously described [1820]. Responses were determined using three activity measures as previously described [18]. An in-depth description of the analysis methods is included in the Supplemental Response Definitions section.
Statistical Methods
The exact log-rank test, as implemented using Proc StatXact for SASR, was used to compare event-free survival distributions between treatment and control groups. P-values were two-sided and were not adjusted for multiple comparisons given the exploratory nature of the studies.
Drugs and Formulation
SGI-1776 was provided to the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program by Supergen, through the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI). Powder was dissolved in sterile water for injection, titrated to pH 3.5 with 1N NaOH, and stored for up to 1 week. SGI-1776 was administered orally 5 days per week at 148 mg/kg (solid tumor models) or 74 mg/kg (ALL models) for 3 consecutive weeks. SGI-1776 was provided to each consortium investigator in coded vials for blinded testing.
In vitro testing
SGI-1776 demonstrated potent cytotoxic activity, with T/C% values approaching 0% for all of the cell lines at the highest concentration tested. The median relative IC50 value for the PPTP cell lines was 3.1 μM, with a range from 0.3 μM (Kasumi-1) to 4.5 μM (Ramos). The most sensitive cell line, Kasumi-1, is an AML cell line that has an activating KIT mutation.
A metric used to compare the relative responsiveness of the PPTP cell lines to SGI-1776 is the ratio of the median relative IC50 of the entire panel to that of each cell line, Table I. Higher ratios are indicative of greater sensitivity to SGI-1776. Kasumi-1 (AML) and CHLA-9 (Ewing sarcoma) were relatively sensitive to SGI-1776 with each cell line having a relative IC50 value substantially lower than the median for the entire panel. The remaining cell lines showed similar relative IC50 values, with 18 of the remaining 20 cell lines tested showing values between 1 μM and 4 μM. These observations suggest that SGI-1776 has a relatively specific effect against a minority of pediatric cancer cell lines with selected activated kinases at SGI-1776 concentrations ≤0.5 μM, whereas most cell lines require higher concentrations to respond (in the 1–4 μM range).
Table I
Table I
Summary of in Vitro Activity of SGI-1776
In vivo testing
SGI-1776 was tested against the PPTP solid tumor xenografts using a dose of 148 mg/kg administered by the oral gavage daily for 5 days per week for 3 weeks. For the ALL panel (using NOD-SCID mice), the maximum tolerated dose was 74 mg/kg, and this dose was used for efficacy testing. The total planned treatment and observation period was 6 weeks. SGI-1776 was well tolerated with 10 of 369 treated mice dying (3%) compared to 2 of 363 control mice (0.6%). All 39 xenograft models studied were considered evaluable for efficacy. A complete summary of results is provided in Supplemental Table I.
SGI-1776 induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to control in 9 of 31 (29%) of the evaluable solid tumor xenografts and in 1 of 8 (13%) of the evaluable ALL xenografts (Table II). For those xenografts with a significant difference in EFS distribution between treated and control groups, the EFS T/C activity measure additionally requires an EFS T/C value of > 2.0 for intermediate activity and indicates a substantial agent effect in slowing tumor growth. High activity further requires a reduction in final tumor volume compared to the starting tumor volume (see Supplemental Response Definitions). SGI-1776 induced tumor growth inhibition meeting criteria for intermediate EFS T/C activity in 1 of 31 (3%) evaluable solid tumor xenografts. For the ALL panel, 0 of 8 xenografts met criteria for intermediate activity. Objective responses were not observed in either the solid tumor panels or in the ALL panel. As a positive control we tested SGI-1776 against the Flt-3-driven B myeloid leukemia, MV4;11, growing as a subcutaneous xenograft, based on the high level of activity previously observed [16]. SGI-1776 induced complete response in this model, suggesting that pediatric models of solid tumors and ALL are relatively less sensitive to SGI-1776 than the MV4;11 model.
Table II
Table II
Summary of in Vivo Activity of SGI-1776
SGI-1776 is an imidazo [1,2-b] pyridazine compound, which has been shown to have inhibitory activity against PIM1, 2 and 3 kinases as well as FLT3 and haspin kinases. However, two recent Phase 1 studies of SGI-1776 in patients with relapsed leukemias or refractory prostate cancer /NHL were terminated due to dose limiting toxicity of cardiac QTc prolongation. In parallel, the PPTP tested this agent against a broad spectrum of pediatric cancer histotypes. There was very limited evidence for activity, except against the FLT3-driven MV4;11 model. SGI-1776 inhibits PIM1 and FLT3 kinases in the same concentration range, hence the results in vivo suggest that at the drug exposures achieved PIM1 would be inhibited. Thus, our data suggest a limited role for PIM1 as a driver kinase for growth and survival for the pediatric models studied.
Supplementary Material
Supp Table S1
Supplementary Data
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NO1-CM-42216, CA21765, and CA108786 from the National Cancer Institute, and AT13387 was provided by Astex Therapeutics. In addition to the authors represents work contributed by the following: Sherry Ansher, Lili T Belcastro, Edward Favours, Henry S. Friedman, Debbie Payne-Turner, Charles Stopford, Mayamin Tajbakhsh, Chandra Tucker, Amy Wozniak, Joe Zeidner, Ellen Zhang, and Jian Zhang. Children’s Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research is affiliated with the University of New South Wales and Sydney Children’s Hospital.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT: The authors consider that there are no actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
1. Reeves R, Spies GA, Kiefer M, et al. Primary structure of the putative human oncogene, pim-1. Gene. 1990;90(2):303–307. [PubMed]
2. Shah N, Pang B, Yeoh KG, et al. Potential roles for the PIM1 kinase in human cancer - a molecular and therapeutic appraisal. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(15):2144–2151. [PubMed]
3. Saris CJ, Domen J, Berns A. The pim-1 oncogene encodes two related protein-serine/threonine kinases by alternative initiation at AUG and CUG. EMBO J. 1991;10(3):655–664. [PubMed]
4. Cuypers HT, Selten G, Quint W, et al. Murine leukemia virus-induced T-cell lymphomagenesis: integration of proviruses in a distinct chromosomal region. Cell. 1984;37(1):141–150. [PubMed]
5. Moroy T, Verbeek S, Ma A, et al. E mu N- and E mu L-myc cooperate with E mu pim-1 to generate lymphoid tumors at high frequency in double-transgenic mice. Oncogene. 1991;6(11):1941–1948. [PubMed]
6. van Lohuizen M, Verbeek S, Krimpenfort P, et al. Predisposition to lymphomagenesis in pim-1 transgenic mice: cooperation with c-myc and N-myc in murine leukemia virus-induced tumors. Cell. 1989;56(4):673–682. [PubMed]
7. Macdonald A, Campbell DG, Toth R, et al. Pim kinases phosphorylate multiple sites on Bad and promote 14-3-3 binding and dissociation from Bcl-XL. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Grundler R, Brault L, Gasser C, et al. Dissection of PIM serine/threonine kinases in FLT3-ITD-induced leukemogenesis reveals PIM1 as regulator of CXCL12-CXCR4-mediated homing and migration. J Exp Med. 2009;206(9):1957–1970. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Roh M, Gary B, Song C, et al. Overexpression of the oncogenic kinase Pim-1 leads to genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2003;63(23):8079–8084. [PubMed]
10. Zippo A, De Robertis A, Bardelli M, et al. Identification of Flk-1 target genes in vasculogenesis: Pim-1 is required for endothelial and mural cell differentiation in vitro. Blood. 2004;103(12):4536–4544. [PubMed]
11. Bachmann M, Hennemann H, Xing PX, et al. The oncogenic serine/threonine kinase Pim-1 phosphorylates and inhibits the activity of Cdc25C-associated kinase 1 (C-TAK1): a novel role for Pim-1 at the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(46):48319–48328. [PubMed]
12. Mochizuki T, Kitanaka C, Noguchi K, et al. Physical and functional interactions between Pim-1 kinase and Cdc25A phosphatase. Implications for the Pim-1-mediated activation of the c-Myc signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(26):18659–18666. [PubMed]
13. Wang Z, Bhattacharya N, Mixter PF, et al. Phosphorylation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21Cip1/WAF1 by Pim-1 kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1593(1):45–55. [PubMed]
14. Amson R, Sigaux F, Przedborski S, et al. The human protooncogene product p33pim is expressed during fetal hematopoiesis and in diverse leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(22):8857–8861. [PubMed]
15. Kumar A, Mandiyan V, Suzuki Y, et al. Crystal structures of proto-oncogene kinase Pim1: a target of aberrant somatic hypermutations in diffuse large cell lymphoma. J Mol Biol. 2005;348(1):183–193. [PubMed]
16. Chen LS, Redkar S, Bearss D, et al. Pim kinase inhibitor, SGI-1776, induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood. 2009;114(19):4150–4157. [PubMed]
17. Frgala T, Kalous O, Proffitt RT, et al. A fluorescence microplate cytotoxicity assay with a 4-log dynamic range that identifies synergistic drug combinations. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(3):886–897. [PubMed]
18. Houghton PJ, Morton CL, Tucker C, et al. The pediatric preclinical testing program: description of models and early testing results. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49(7):928–940. [PubMed]
19. Keir ST, Morton CL, Billups C, et al. Initial testing of VNP40101M (Cloretazine) by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;51(3):439–441. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Liem NL, Papa RA, Milross CG, et al. Characterization of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenograft models for the preclinical evaluation of new therapies. Blood. 2004;103(10):3905–3914. [PubMed]