PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Addiction. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 March 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3273659
NIHMSID: NIHMS326612

Alcohol Brand Appearances in U.S. Popular Music

Abstract

Aims

The average US adolescent is exposed to 34 references to alcohol in popular music daily. Although brand recognition is an independent, potent risk factor for alcohol outcomes among adolescents, alcohol brand appearances in popular music have not been systematically assessed. We aimed to determine the prevalence of and contextual elements associated with alcohol brand appearances in U.S. popular music.

Design

Qualitative content analysis.

Setting

We used Billboard Magazine to identify songs to which US adolescents were most exposed in 2005-2007. For each of the 793 songs, two trained coders independently analyzed the lyrics of each song for references to alcohol and alcohol brand appearances. Subsequent in-depth assessments utilised Atlas.ti to determine contextual factors associated with each of the alcohol brand appearances.

Measurements

Our final code book contained 27 relevant codes representing 6 categories: alcohol types, consequences, emotional states, activities, status, and objects.

Findings

Average inter-rater reliability was high (κ=0.80), and all differences were easily adjudicated. Of the 793 songs in our sample, 169 (21.3%) explicitly referred to alcohol, and of those, 41 (24.3%) contained an alcohol brand appearance. Consequences associated with alcohol were more often positive than negative (41.5% vs. 17.1%, P<.001). Alcohol brand appearances were commonly associated with wealth (63.4%), sex (58.5%), luxury objects (51.2%), partying (48.8%), other drugs (43.9%), and vehicles (39.0%).

Conclusions

One-in-five songs sampled from U.S. popular music had explicit references to alcohol, and one quarter of these mentioned a specific alcohol brand. These alcohol brand appearances are commonly associated with a luxury lifestyle characterised by wealth, sex, partying, and other drugs.

Keywords: Alcohol, music, product placement, marketing, advertising, adolescent, vodka, tequila, rap music, hip-hop music, country music

INTRODUCTION

Alcohol consumption is the leading root cause of mortality and serious morbidity in adolescence (1-3). About 70% of deaths in this age group are due to four major causes: motor vehicle accidents, other accidents, homicide, and suicide (1, 3), and it is estimated that these deaths are related to alcohol as much as 40-50% of the time (2-4). Alcohol is also considered the leading cause of morbidity in this population, due to its established association with nonfatal injuries (3, 4), other substance use (3, 5), risky sexual behavior (1, 6), academic failure (3, 7), physical and sexual assault (4), and alcohol dependence (8).

Despite the negative impact of alcohol use on adolescents, consumption remains high in the U.S. among this population: 45% of youth in grades 9-12 are current drinkers, defined as having a complete alcoholic drink during the past 30 days (1). Furthermore, over one-fourth (26%) of these adolescents are current “binge” drinkers—defined as having had 4-5 alcoholic beverages in a single sitting at least once in the past 30 days (1)—and nearly one-third of adolescents (29%) have, within the past 30 days, ridden in a car driven by someone who has used alcohol (1, 3). These early exposures are particularly concerning in light of the fact that the odds of future alcohol abuse or dependence increase by 7% for each year of age below 21 that alcohol consumption begins (8).

Alcohol use is associated with multiple sociodemographic (9, 10), environmental (10-13), and personal factors (10, 12-14). However, a growing body of literature suggests that exposure to certain mass media representations of alcohol—both narrative (e.g., movies) and persuasive (e.g., advertisements)—may be among the strongest risk factors for adolescent alcohol use (15-27). These media exposures are common; 83% of contemporary films (including 57% of G/PG films) depict alcohol use, exposing the average US youth 10-14 years of age to 5.6 hours of movie alcohol use and 244 alcohol brand appearances annually (28). Additionally, data from 2009 suggest that, during their formative years, U.S. youth view on average 366 alcohol advertisements on television annually (29).

Little research, however, has focused on alcohol representations in popular music, which has emerged as the most frequent alcohol-related media exposure (30). A previous assessment found an average 13.7 instances of alcohol use per song-hour (31), with wide variation by genre. American adolescents spend an average of 2.5 hours per day listening to music (32); depending on what musical genre they prefer, exposure could be quite substantial. Moreover, prior research shows that these references are commonly associated with consequences that adolescents find particularly compelling, such as sex, popularity, and partying (31). Thus, music could serve to link alcohol with these outcomes and enhance positive expectancies for alcohol use.

Prior research has not, however, examined alcohol brand appearances in popular music. Brand appearances are important to assess because they may function as advertising, whether or not they are paid for or sanctioned by the alcohol industry. Developing brand recognition is a crucial step in the marketing of any product, and companies go to great lengths to create positive associations with their brands through product placement activities. Moreover, for both cigarettes and alcohol, brand recognition and having a favorite brand are independent, potent risk factors for the initiation and maintenance of the use of these substances among adolescents (22, 33, 34). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and contextual elements of alcohol brand appearances in popular songs in the U.S.

METHODS

Song Selection

We used Billboard Magazine (35) to identify the most popular songs in the US of 2005-2007, the most recent complete available data when the study was begun. Billboard annually uses an algorithm that integrates data from both sales and airplay to determine the top songs according to exposure. Sales data for this algorithm are compiled by Nielsen SoundScan from merchants representing over 90% of the US music market, including sales from music stores, direct-to-consumer transactions, and Internet sales and downloads. Billboard’s airplay data utilise Nielsen Broadcast Data Systems, which electronically monitors radio stations in more than 120 representative markets across the United States. Integrating these data, Billboard reported the following youth-relevant lists of popular song titles for each of the years from 2005-2007: the “Pop 100” (N=100) the “Billboard Hot 100” (N=100), “Hot Country Tracks” (N=60), “Hot R&B/Hip Hop Songs” (N=100), “Hot Rap Tracks” (N=25), “Mainstream Rock Tracks” (N=40), and “Modern Rock Tracks” (N=40). The lists are “closed-out” at year-end, after which time the song rankings do not change. Some songs were included on more than one chart, leaving 793 unique songs in this sample. Additional popular charts, such as the “Adult Top 40,” were also available but were not included in this analysis focusing on youth exposure to popular music.

Initial Coding

For each of the 793 songs, two trained coders familiar with popular music independently analyzed the lyrics of each song for references to alcohol and alcohol brand appearances. As part of a formal training, each coder was given lists of frequently used slang terms related to alcohol use. We computed inter-rater agreement and kappa statistics (36) for each of the data elements coded and found excellent agreement between coders on each of these measures, such as the specific number of times alcohol was mentioned in a song. Minimum agreement was 74% and the few rare inter-rater disagreements were easily adjudicated between the coders (31).

Subsequent Coding

The process described above resulted in 169 of 793 (21.3%) of songs that explicitly referred to alcohol. Of these songs with references to alcohol, 41 (24.3%) of songs specifically contained alcohol brand appearances. Two qualitative coders (E.N. and K.R.) then used Atlas.ti version 5.2 (37) to assess these particular songs in more depth. We selected a qualitative approach for this phase of the research in order to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the contextual associations with alcohol brand appearances.

Selected texts included any paragraph (e.g., verse or chorus) in which an alcohol brand appearance was found. We selected these specific paragraphs (rather than the entire song) in order to focus on elements specifically associated with the alcohol brand appearances. We selected the entire verse and/or chorus in order to maximise consistency.

The coders initially assessed the first 20% of the sample (N = 9 songs) using the in vivo coding feature of Atlas.ti. This feature allows coders to select any relevant text during a tentative coding process, allowing theory to emerge from the data (38). This method of building rather than testing theory is consistent with our selected analytic framework of grounded theory (please see analytic considerations below) (38). Based on these initial assessments and on a discussion process between the two coders and the principal investigator (B.P.), we developed a final study code book, condensing similar or redundant codes and using a system of open codes that incorporated new themes as they emerged from the text. The two coders then independently coded data from all 41 songs using the final codebook. We assessed the inter-rater reliability of our coding using Cohen’s kappa scores and adjudicated any discrepancies using an iterative process.

Final Coding Scheme

Our final code book contained 27 relevant codes representing 6 different categories: alcohol types, consequences, emotional states, activities, status, and objects (Table 2).

Table 2
Associations between presence of a brand name and other song characteristics.

Alcohol types

Nine alcohol-type codes identified the specific type of alcohol (‘NBBEER’, ‘NBRUM’, ‘NBWINE’, etc.) and whether that brand was a “luxury” brand (‘NBLUX’). For the purposes of this analysis, we defined a “luxury” brand as one which costs on average more than twice as much as a generic brand of the same alcohol type, as determined from a routine Internet search.

Consequences

A pair of codes were used to indicate either positive (‘ALCPOS’) or negative (‘ALCNEG’) consequences of the alcohol use as suggested by song lyrics. When consequences were not discussed or neutral, no code was used.

Emotional states

Two codes were used to define emotional states. ‘FEEL GOOD’ was indicated when the subject expressed a positive emotional state. ‘COPING’ indicated the use of alcohol to modify mood, in an attempt to deal with an emotional issue.

Activities

Another series of codes were related to activities found juxtaposed with alcohol brand appearances. ‘SEX’ indicated a reference to sex or a sexualised act, while ‘DEGSEX,’ defined as degrading sex, was applied to any ‘SEX’ code in which both of the following criteria were satisfied: (1) the sexual act had no emotional component (i.e., it was completely physical) and (2) a power differential was conspicuous between the sexual partners.(39-41) ‘DANCE’ described an act of dancing or a dance move and ‘PARTY’ described the act of socializing with the goal of mutual enjoyment. ‘COMMUNITY’ indicated a social activity that invoked an intimate sense of belonging or community. ‘CRIME’ referred to criminal or illegal activity, while ‘DEAL’ specifically referred to the criminal act of buying or selling drugs.

Status

Codes related to status were ‘WEALTH’, ‘ELITE’ and ‘STREET’. ‘WEALTH’ coded references, often to money or luxury items, that indicated substantial financial resources. ‘ELITE’ indicated an individual was socially elite, popular or desirable. ‘STREET’ referenced an individual’s origins in, or lifestyle associated with, “the streets,” which often represented humble beginnings.

Objects

Finally, several codes related to objects mentioned in conjunction with brand-name alcohol. ‘WEAPON’ coded a reference to a weapon, ‘OTHERDRUG’ indicated a drug or drug use that was not alcohol-related, but which excluded references to dealing, ‘VEHIC’ indicated a car or a reference to one of its components, such as rims, and ‘LUX’ was used to identify luxury items other than alcohol. Again, we used a price point more than double the generic to define a “luxury” item.

The average kappa score for each of the above variables was 0.80, which Landis and Koch (42) describe as a “nearly perfect” level of inter-rater reliability. Every discrepancy between the two coders was discussed among the team and easily adjudicated, resulting in a final data set.

Analytic Considerations

As discussed above, we used grounded theory to analyze our data. The process of grounded theory analysis is systematic and moves from “basic description” (in vivo coding, described above) to “conceptual ordering” described as “organizing data into discrete categories according to their properties and dimensions and then using description to elucidate those categories (38).” We deemed this to be the most appropriate approach because of (1) the relative lack of prior theoretical work in this area and (2) our goal of obtaining an in-depth assessment of possible textual meanings.

Sample size in qualitative studies is guided by thematic saturation, a process by which a researcher collects and analyzes data until he or she is not learning anything new (43, 44). Although we first analyzed only songs from 2005 (31), at that time thematic saturation was not sufficient due to relatively few examples of brand names related to alcohol. Only after two additional years of data collection (2006 and 2007) was saturation deemed to be sufficient.

The frequencies of the codes were assessed using a quasi-statistical qualitative methodology (45). We summed the number of counts for each code and used Stata Statistical Software (46) to assess statistical significance of differences in code counts using chi-square analyses. We defined statistical significance with a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 a priori.

RESULTS

Of the 793 songs in our sample, 169 (21.3%) explicitly referred to alcohol, and of those, 41 (24.3%) contained an alcohol brand appearance. Over three-fourths (78.1%) of alcohol brand appearances involved luxury brands, and 51.2% of songs contained references to other luxury items as well. Tequila (Patron) and cognac (mostly Hennessy) were the most frequently mentioned types of branded alcohol, at a prevalence of 29.3% each, with vodka (mostly Grey Goose) following at 26.8% (Table 1). Of the songs with alcohol and an alcohol brand appearance, the majority of songs were Rap (63%), R&B/Hip-Hop (24%), or country (12%). No pop or rock songs mentioned name brands.

Table 1
Alcohol brand appearances from 2005-2007*

Associations between presence of a brand name and other song characteristics are presented in Table 2. While 17.1% of alcohol brand appearances were associated with negative consequences, 41.5% were associated with positive consequences (P<.001). We also determined if there were associations between presence of a brand name and types of consequences such as mental, physical, or social consequences. These analyses demonstrated that, compared with songs mentioning alcohol but without a brand name, presence of a brand name was associated with more positive social (P=.03) and sexual (P=.04) consequences but more negative legal consequences (P<.001). Mental, emotional, physical, and monetary consequences were no different in these different types of songs.

Qualitatively coded examples are presented in Table 3. One in 8 (12.2%) brand-name alcohol references were made in the context of a positive emotional state not the direct consequence of alcohol. Only two out of 41 songs (4.9%) referenced branded alcohol as a means of coping with negative emotional issues.

Table 3
Abbreviated code book with examples.

Alcohol brand appearances were commonly associated with sex (58.5%) – the majority of which was classified as degrading (75.2%) – and partying (48.8%). Alcohol brand appearances were also mentioned in songs that referenced dancing (31.7%) and crime (22.0%) or drug dealing (12.2%). A small portion of songs (4.9%) associated with an alcohol brand appearance invoked a sense of community or intimate social belonging, as seen in the lines, “Beer and bonfires / Wide open throttle, Coors in a bottle / It’s all for one and one for all y’all.”

Most songs were associated with wealth (63.4%) and over a third of songs (36.6%) made reference to the singer’s origins or lifestyle being associated with “the streets.” A substantial proportion of songs (43.9%) also make reference to the singer’s status as part of the social elite, as exemplified by the lyrics, “I’m on that Patron so get like me / … Er’body love me I’m so fly.”

Weapons (26.8%), other drugs (43.9%) and luxury objects (51.2%), other than luxury brand alcohol, appeared often in songs containing alcohol brand appearances. Vehicles (39.0%) were also commonly mentioned in these songs.

DISCUSSION

This qualitative assessment of popular music finds that alcohol is frequently referenced in popular music, and that when it is referenced a brand name is supplied about 25% of the time. This represents about 3.4 alcohol brand appearances per song-hour (31). Given that the average adolescent is exposed to about 2.5 hours of popular music per day (32), he or she will be substantially exposed to alcohol brand references in popular music on an annual basis. Furthermore, specific brand names mentioned are frequently luxury distilled spirits brands and are associated with a lifestyle characterised by degrading sexual activity, wealth, partying, and violence. Branded alcohol references were most common in Rap and R&B/Hip-Hop.

Frequent exposure of young people to brand-name references in popular music is of concern. Brand recognition is an independent and potent risk factor for the initiation and maintenance of substance use among adolescents (22, 33, 34), and references to alcohol brand-names in popular music may be particularly potent because they combine the persuasive appeal of advertising with the narrative appeal of an embedded and naturalistic representation of alcohol. This study suggests that brand-name references to alcohol are strongly associated with positive feelings and associations, which are often the goal of advertisements. Moreover, the brands found in music represent the same distilled spirits brands that are increasingly named as favorites by underage drinkers, especially females (47).

The relatively high level of brand-name appearances related to alcohol may be because of strengthening ties between the alcohol and music industries (Figure 1). An early example of alcohol advertising in the music industry involved the campaign launched by St. Ides Malt Liquor in the early 1990s, featuring TV and radio spots that showcased major rap artists, including 2Pac, Ice Cube, and Dr. Dre. While advertisers continue to engage in such traditional advertising ventures, many companies have turned to less traditional methods, including sponsoring music tours or hosting events in clubs (48). Alcohol companies have also more formally entered the music industry; from 1995 to 2001 alcohol industry giant Seagram’s acquired Universal and Polygram Records, merging the two labels to form the world’s largest music conglomerate. Though Seagram’s sold the label in 2001, the two companies maintained the synergistic marketing relationship they had established while jointly owned, continuing to sponsor music tours and use individual artists in their promotions. Finally, individual artists, particularly those in the rap and hip hop community, have begun to establish and promote their own alcohol lines, including Lil’ Jon (Little Jonathan Wineries, 2008), Ludacris (Conjure Vodka, 2009), Jay-Z (Armadale Vodka, 2002), Snoop Dogg (Landy Cognac, 2008), TI (Remy Martin Cognac, 2010) and Sean “P Diddy” Combs (Ciroc Vodka, 2001) (49-53). The fact that these artists primarily represent Rap and R&B/Hip-Hop labels may explain the preponderance of branded alcohol references in these two genres (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Historical perspective on major formal relationships between the alcohol and popular music industries.

Most instances of brand-name references in song lyrics seem to be unsolicited and unpaid for by advertising companies. However, the line between paid advertising and brand references as an artistic choice has become difficult to distinguish, as advertising companies have begun to retroactively reward artists with product, sponsorship, or endorsement deals after a song containing their product’s name becomes popular. An example of retroactive paid product placement is Busta Rhymes and P. Diddy’s 2002 hit “Pass the Courvoisier.” Following the song’s release, the cognac’s sales jumped 18.9%, and Courvoisier’s parent company, France’s Allied Domecq, reached a lucrative promotional deal with Busta and P. Diddy’s management company, Violator (54).

Although rap and hip-hop music are popular among youth of all races (32), these genres still seem to be most heavily preferred by African-Americans in the U.S. For example, it is estimated that about 30-40% of those who purchase rap music are African-American (55), while African-Americans comprise only about 13% of the U.S. population (56). Our finding that alcohol brand references are most prominent in Rap and R&B/Hip-Hop (Table 2) suggests, therefore, that African-Americans are heavily exposed to these potentially influential messages. This exposure may be a potentially changeable source of the substantial alcohol-related health disparities between African-Americans and Caucasians (57, 58). However, it is not entirely clear whether African-Americans are indeed exposed to increased rap and/or hip-hop music compared with Caucasians, in part because Nielsen data have not systematically examined racial makeup of popular music audiences (55). Therefore, it would be valuable for future work to confirm whether African-Americans are disproportionately exposed to alcohol brand references and to examine the potential influence of these messages.

Compared with unbranded references to alcohol, branded references were more commonly associated with positive social consequences, positive sexual consequences, and negative legal consequences. However these associations are likely related to the fact that branded references were commonly associated with Rap and R&B/Hip-Hop genres, which commonly portray idealised social and sexual situations as well as confrontation with police (31).

Organizations of alcohol producers, such as The Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), have developed self-regulating codes regarding appropriate marketing practices (59). One of these guidelines states that it is unethical to target marketing to audiences below legal drinking age (59). However, Rap music is usually found to be a favorite type of music among high school students (60, 61). Therefore, it is probable that campaigns which center upon Rap artists are not in compliance with these guidelines. It may be valuable for future analyses to specifically address whether marketing campaigns associated with popular music, such as Rap and Hip-Hop, are consistent with marketing guidelines established by the industry.

Limitations

One limitation of any qualitative methodology is that interpretation and bias introduced by the researcher poses a threat to internal consistency (43). We sought to minimize this by using a team of two researchers to independently code the data, comparing their responses with reliability scores, and involving a third researcher in all discussions related to codebook development. Another limitation of this analysis is that we only assessed songs from 2005-2007. Because of recent announcements of newly-forming relationships between the music and alcohol industries (49-53), it may be valuable to revisit these analyses in upcoming years. Finally, we coded songs deemed to be the most popular among US adolescents. Thus, although music popular in the US is likely to be roughly similar to that in other parts of the world, these findings may not be generalisable to those in other nations.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates when alcohol is referenced in popular music—which occurs in about 20% of songs—a brand name is supplied about 25% of the time. Furthermore, we found that brand-name references were commonly associated with a lifestyle often characterised by degrading sexual activity, wealth, partying, and violence. Because both brand recognition and positively-portrayed substance use are powerful predictors of adolescent substance use, it may be important to assess the associations between brand-name alcohol references in popular music with clinically-relevant alcohol use outcomes.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

When alcohol is referenced in U.S. popular music, a brand name is supplied about 25% of the time. Based on these estimates and published data, the average U.S. adolescent is heavily exposed to branded alcohol in popular music. Of songs with alcohol and an alcohol brand appearance, the vast majority are categorised as Rap (~60%) or R&B/Hip-Hop (~25%). Brand-name references to alcohol are commonly associated with a lifestyle characterised by degrading sexual activity, wealth, partying, and violence.

Acknowledgments

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (K07-CA114315 to B.P.). Although they provided financial support, they were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The authors have no connection with and do not receive any funding from the tobacco, alcohol, pharmaceutical, or gaming industries.

Contributor Information

Brian A. Primack, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Erin Nuzzo, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Kristen R. Rice, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

James D. Sargent, Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth University School of Medicine, Hanover, NH.

REFERENCES

1. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Ross J, Hawkins J, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2007. MMWR. 2008;57(SS-4):1–136. [PubMed]
2. Smith GS, Branas CC, Miller TR. Fatal nontraffic injuries involving alcohol: A metaanalysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jun;33(6):659–68. [PubMed]
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Rockville, MD: 2007.
4. Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter MV, Wechsler H. Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students age 18-24: Changes from 1998 to 2001. Annual Review of Public Health. 2005;26:259–79. [PubMed]
5. Best D, Gross S, Manning V, Gossop M, Witton J, Strang J. Cannabis use in adolescents: the impact of risk and protective factors and social functioning. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005 Nov;24(6):483–8. [PubMed]
6. Cooper ML, Orcutt HK. Drinking and sexual experience on first dates among adolescents. Journal of abnormal psychology. 1997 May;106(2):191–202. [PubMed]
7. White AM, Swartzwelder HS. Age-related effects of alcohol on memory and memory-related brain function in adolescents and adults. In: Galanter M, editor. Recent Developments in Alcoholism, Vol 17: Alcohol Problems in Adolescents and Young Adults: Epidemiology, Neurobiology, Prevention, Treatment. Springer; New York, NY: 2005. pp. 161–76. [PubMed]
8. Grant BF, Dawson DA. Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. Journal of substance abuse. 1997;9:103–10. [PubMed]
9. Schulte MT, Ramo D, Brown SA. Gender differences in factors influencing alcohol use and drinking progression among adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;29(6):535–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Nash SG, McQueen A, Bray JH. Pathways to adolescent alcohol use: family environment, peer influence, and parental expectations. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Jul;37(1):19–28. [PubMed]
11. Kuntsche E, Jordan MD. Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in relation to peer and school factors. Results of multilevel analyses. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Sep 15;84(2):167–74. [PubMed]
12. Dielman TE, Butchart AT, Shope JT, Miller M. Environmental correlates of adolescent substance use and misuse: implications for prevention programs. Int J Addict. 1990;25(7A-8A):855–80. [PubMed]
13. Ellickson SL, Tucker JS, Klein DJ, McGuigan KA. Prospective risk factors for alcohol misuse in late adolescence. J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Nov;62(6):773–82. [PubMed]
14. Olds RS, Thombs DL. The relationship of adolescent perceptions of peer norms and parent involvement to cigarette and alcohol use. J Sch Health. 2001 Aug;71(6):223–8. [PubMed]
15. Austin EW, Chen MJ, Grube JW. How does alcohol advertising influence underage drinking? The role of desirability, identification and skepticism. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Apr;38(4):376–84. [PubMed]
16. Bhana A. Alcohol advertising, movies and adolescents. Addiction. 2008 Dec;103(12):1935–6. discussion 7-8. [PubMed]
17. Chung PJ, Garfield CF, Elliott MN, Ostroff J, Ross C, Jernigan DH, et al. Association between Adolescent Viewership and Alcohol Advertising on Cable Television. Am J Public Health. 2009 Aug 20; [PubMed]
18. Collins RL, Ellickson PL, McCaffrey D, Hambarsoomians K. Early adolescent exposure to alcohol advertising and its relationship to underage drinking. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Jun;40(6):527–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Dal Cin S, Worth KA, Gerrard M, Stoolmiller M, Sargent JD, Wills TA, et al. Watching and drinking: expectancies, prototypes, and friends’ alcohol use mediate the effect of exposure to alcohol use in movies on adolescent drinking. Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;28(4):473–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Engels RC, Hermans R, van Baaren RB, Hollenstein T, Bot SM. Alcohol portrayal on television affects actual drinking behaviour. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 May-Jun;44(3):244–9. [PubMed]
21. Hanewinkel R, Tanski SE, Sargent JD. Exposure to alcohol use in motion pictures and teen drinking in Germany. Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;36(5):1068–77. [PubMed]
22. Henriksen L, Feighery EC, Schleicher NC, Fortmann SP. Receptivity to alcohol marketing predicts initiation of alcohol use. J Adolesc Health. 2008 Jan;42(1):28–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. McClure AC, Stoolmiller M, Tanski SE, Worth KA, Sargent JD. Alcohol-branded merchandise and its association with drinking attitudes and outcomes in US adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Mar;163(3):211–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Sargent JD, Wills TA, Stoolmiller M, Gibson J, Gibbons FX. Alcohol use in motion pictures and its relation with early-onset teen drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jan;67(1):54–65. [PubMed]
25. Smith LA, Foxcroft DR. The effect of alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on drinking behaviour in young people: systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Wills TA, Sargent JD, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Stoolmiller M. Movie exposure to alcohol cues and adolescent alcohol problems: a longitudinal analysis in a national sample. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Mar;23(1):23–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Anderson P, de Bruijn A, Angus K, Gordon R, Hastings G. Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 May-Jun;44(3):229–43. [PubMed]
28. Dal Cin S, Worth KA, Dalton MA, Sargent JD. Youth exposure to alcohol use and brand appearances in popular contemporary movies. Addiction. 2008 Dec;103(12):1925–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth Youth Exposure to Alcohol Advertising on Television, 2001-2009. Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Baltimore, MD: 2010.
30. Herd D. Changes in the prevalence of alcohol use in rap song lyrics, 1979–97. Addiction. 2005;100(9):1258–69. [10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01192.x] [PubMed]
31. Primack BA, Dalton MA, Carroll MV, Agarwal AA, Fine MJ. Content analysis of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs in popular music. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Feb;162(2):169–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Rideout V, Foehr U, Roberts DF. Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-olds. Kaiser Family Foundation; Menlo Park, CA: 2010.
33. Cobb C, Ward KD, Maziak W, Shihadeh AL, Eissenberg T. Waterpipe tobacco smoking: an emerging health crisis in the United States. Am J Health Behav. 2010 May-Jun;34(3):275–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Volk RJ, Edwards DW, Lewis RA, Schulenberg J. Smoking and preference for brand of cigarette among adolescents. Journal of substance abuse. 1996;8(3):347–59. [PubMed]
35. Billboard 2005 Year in Music. 2005 Billboard.com. [cited 2007 March 26]; Available from: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/yearend/2005/index.jsp.
36. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960:196037–46.
37. Atlas.ti Qualitative Analysis Software Atlas.ti Qualitative Analysis Software. 5.2 ed. Atlas.ti; Hanover, Germany: 2008.
38. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, California: 1998.
39. Primack BA, Gold MA, Schwarz EB, Dalton MA. Degrading and non-degrading sex in popular music: a content analysis. Public Health Rep. 2008 Sep-Oct;123(5):593–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Primack BA, Douglas EL, Fine MJ, Dalton MA. Exposure to sexual lyrics and sexual experience among urban adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):317–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Martino SC, Collins RL, Elliott MN, Strachman A, Kanouse DE, Berry SH. Exposure to degrading versus nondegrading music lyrics and sexual behavior among youth. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e430–41. [PubMed]
42. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74. [PubMed]
43. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2002.
44. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Jama. 2000;284(3):357–62. [PubMed]
45. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Doing Qualitative Research in Primary Care: Multiple Strategies. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; Newbury Park, CA: 1999. Clinical Research: A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Roadmap; pp. 3–30.
46. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software. 9.2 ed. Stata Corporation; College Station, TX: 2007.
47. Tanski S, McClure A, Jernigan D, Sargent J. Alcohol brand preference and binge drinking among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(7):675–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Herd D. Changes in the prevalence of alcohol use in rap song lyrics, 1979-1997. Addiction. 2005;100:1258–69. [PubMed]
49. Smith C. Little Jonathan Winery is Lil Jon’s, Label by Damion Hickman Design. 2008 prohiphop.com. [cited 2011 April 16]; Available from: http://www.prohiphop.com/2008/03/little-jonathan.html.
50. Mullman J. Rap Mogul’s Boycott of Cristal Champagne Unlikely to Hurt Brand. Advertising Age. 2006 July 27;
51. Harling D. Snoop Dogg Partners with Landy Cognac. 2010 hiphopdx.com. [cited 2011 April 16]; Available from: http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/news/id.11649/title.snoop-dogg-partners-with-landy-cognac.
52. Starbury ATI. Remy Martin Cognac Officially Announce Partnership. 2010 ballerstatus.com. cited 2011 April 16.
53. Entertainmentwise Diddy Gives Alcohol A Shot. 2001 entertianmentwise.com. [cited 2011 April 16]; Available from: http://www.entertainmentwise.com/photos/38090/1/diddy-gives-alcohol-a-shot.
54. Lehu J-M. Branded Entertainment: Product Placement and Brand Strategy in the Entertainment Business. Kogan Page Limited; Philadelphia, PA: 2007.
55. Bialik C. Is the Conventional Wisdom Correct In Measuring Hip-Hop Audience? The Wall Street Journal. 2005 May 5;
56. U.S. Census Bureau U.S. Census, 2010. U.S. Census Bureau; Washington, DC: 2011.
57. Caetano R. Alcohol-related health disparities and treatment-related epidemiological findings among whites, blacks, and Hispanics in the United States. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003 Aug;27(8):1337–9. [PubMed]
58. Stahre M, Brewer R, Naimi T, Miller J. Alcohol-Attributable Deaths and Years of Potential Life Lost – United States, 2001. MMWR. 2004;53(37):866–70. [PubMed]
59. Distilled Spirits Council of the United States Code of Responsible Practices for Beverage Alcohol Advertising and Marketing. Distilled Spirits Council of the United States; Washington, DC: 2009.
60. Tanner J, Asbridge M, Wortley S. Our favourite melodies: musical consumption and teenage lifestyles. The British Journal of Sociology. 2008;59(1):117–44. [10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00185.x] [PubMed]
61. Primack BA, Douglas EL, Kraemer KL. Exposure to cannabis in popular music and cannabis use among adolescents. Addiction. 2010 Mar;105(3):515–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]