Stem Cell-Based Approaches to Treating HIV Infection

doi:10.1097/COH.0b013e3283412370

Curr Opin HIV AIDS. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 January 27.

Published in final edited form as:

Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2011 January; 6(1): 68–73.

doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e3283412370

PMCID: PMC3267541

NIHMSID: NIHMS350804

Stem Cell-Based Approaches to Treating HIV Infection

Scott G. Kitchen and Jerome A. Zack^*

The UCLA AIDS Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 173 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 615 Charles E. Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90095

^*Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA 173 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 615 Charles E. Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90095

The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Curr Opin HIV AIDS

See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.

Publisher's Disclaimer

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Stem cell based strategies for treating HIV infected individuals represent a novel approach toward reconstituting the ravaged immune system with the ultimate aim of clearing the virus from the body. Genetic modification of human hematopoietic stem cells to produce cells that are either resistant to infection, cells that produce lower amounts of infectious virus, or cells that specifically target the immune response against the virus are currently the dominant strategies under development. This review focuses on the understanding of stem cell based approaches that are under investigation and the rationale behind such approaches.

Recent Findings

Significant progress has recently been made utilizing stem cell based approaches to treat HIV infection. Ideally, a successful strategy would result in immune clearance of the virus from the body as well long-term restoration of overall immune responses to successfully combat everyday environmental antigens. Two recent clinical trails illustrate how new advances in stem cell based approaches may propel this field forward to clinical reality: one that demonstrates that large-scale gene therapy trials can be performed in a conventional, reproducible manner; and one that demonstrates the utilization of a multi-pronged approach using lentiviral-based gene therapy vectors. These clinical trails serve as the foundation for the development of other technologies, discussed here, that are currently in preclinical development.

Summary

Recent advances using stem cell based approaches to treat HIV infection have provided the impetus for a renewed and expanded interest in the development of new cell-based strategies to treat HIV infection as well as a variety of other diseases.

Keywords: stem cells, gene therapy, HIV therapy, engineered immunity

Introduction

HIV infection takes a significant toll on the human immune system, wearing it down into numerical and functional oblivion. The advent of suppressive antiretroviral therapy has had a significant effect on slowing this process and on partially restoring aspects of the immune response lost to the effects of HIV-induced pathology. Even the most successful of the current therapeutic regimens are incapable of eradicating the virus from the body and do not fully restore functional immunity to the levels seen prior to HIV infection. In this regard, there is an important need for therapeutic strategies that are aimed at enhancing the host's ability to effectively clear the ongoing viral infection and restore the damaged immune system. Recently, there has been increased interest in the development of strategies that utilize human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to treat HIV infection and other AIDS-related diseases [1–6].

Successful stem cell based therapies would ideally have several advantages over conventional pharmacologic approaches. First, stem cells have the ability to reconstitute and produce naïve populations of immune cells for prolonged periods of time. Second, HSCs are amenable to genetic manipulation, thus allowing the addition of exogenous elements to the progenitor cells that protect progeny from direct infection and/or allow them to target a specific antigen. Further, HSC based approaches can allow multilineage hematopoietic development to occur, thus reconstituting multiple arms of the immune system. Finally, due to the fact that HSCs can be derived in an autologous fashion, immune tolerance is likely to be high therefore contributing to successful engraftment and subsequent differentiation into functional mature hematopoietic cells. While HSC transplantation technology and procedures are not exactly new, as they are frequently and successfully used in the treatment of many different types of hematological disorders and malignancies [7], the combination of these with a gene therapy approach represents a novel and potentially powerful treatment strategy for HIV and AIDS-related conditions. The primary purpose of this review is to briefly discuss two distinct, basic approaches in the use of human HSCs to restore the human immune system in HIV disease: one approach that attempts to protect newly formed cells from HIV infection and one approach that attempts to produces immune cells that target HIV infected cells. While each approach currently has many facets, they represent a growing interest in treatments for HIV/AIDS that would, most likely in combination with other therapies, result in overcoming the barriers that are necessary for the body to successfully clear the virus.

Viral Persistence and Immune Failure

In the natural history of HIV infection, the common outcome is the failure of the immune response to clear the virus from the body resulting in a persistent infection for the life of the infected individual. The consequences of this persistent infection are a constant interplay between host immune responses and the virus and its ability to mutate and evolve. The fact that HIV hijacks the immune system itself for its replication has considerable effects on the entire physiology of the affected individual. The damage is done to the human immune response very shortly after acute infection with HIV, particularly in the CD4+ T cell compartment in the gut, and increases over time towards the development of AIDS and death [8,9]. A potent, but insufficient, immune response is generated against HIV early following infection that never overcomes the replicative ability of the virus in most individuals [10–12]. This failure is not well understood, but the qualitative and quantitative degrees to which the response is generated are critical components in disease progression and pathogenesis [13–16]. It is critical that a treatment strategy aimed at clearing the virus from infected individuals contributes to the regeneration of immunity that at least partially repairs the damage done by HIV.

Stem Cell Approaches to Treating HIV

A primary therapeutic goal towards treating HIV infection is the augmentation or enhancement of natural immune responses that lead to the direct clearance of the virus from the body. The restoration of a fully functional immune system following HIV infection would be critical to achieve optimal antiviral responses to clear the virus as well as enable the individual to fully cope with other environmental insults and maintain a better quality of life. The advent of virally suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART) has revealed that the immune system has a high degree of plasticity and can allow significant cellular reconstitution, albeit not to the levels seen prior to HIV infection [17,18]. In some cases, antiretroviral therapy can result in immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in the rebounding immune response, causing significant morbidity and mortality in individuals with low CD4 cell counts prior to the initiation of therapy [19,20]. IRIS is essentially characterized by an out of control immune response against a co-infecting pathogen, most likely due to the direct dysregulation cased by HIV infection and the lack of proper immune control by dysfunctional or depleted immune cells of different leukocytic lineages [19]. This type of “skewed” reconstitution highlights the importance of a strategy that promotes multilineage hematopoietic immune restoration in a balanced way. The use of HSCs represents a potentially powerful therapeutic approach that has the potential to restore total functional immunity to the affected individual.

A successful stem cell-based antiretroviral therapeutic strategy would have to satisfy two major requirements: 1) the approach would have to allow the reconstitution of immune responses that would overcome the barriers necessary to clear the virus from the body, and 2) the newly developed cells would themselves have to be protected from direct infection by HIV, thus preventing them from becoming another reservoir of infected cells. Satisfying these two conditions is not likely to be done by any single new “magic bullet” therapy or approach, but in combination with other new or currently utilized therapeutic strategies; such as combined with the use of suppressive ART. The use of HSCs and their ability to undergo multilineage hematopoiesis and prolonged self-renewal in treated individuals as well as the common clinical usage of bone-marrow transplantation techniques are important starting points in this type of approach. Coupled with the ability to genetically modify these cells, an HSC-based gene therapy approach has recently gained impetus in becoming a viable HIV treatment strategy.

Protecting multilineage hematopoietic cells and leukocytes from infection

Most cells in the human leukocyte lineage express the CD4 molecule at some time during their development as well as HIV coreceptors and are thus susceptible to either direct infection or perturbation. These cell types include “classic” CD4+ T-helper cells [21], CD8+ T cells [22,23], a subset of hematopoietic progenitor cells [24–26], B cells [27], NK cells [28,29], eosinophils [30], monocytes/ macrophages [31], neutrophils [32], mast cells/basophils [33], dendritic cells [34] and microglia [35]. Thus, in infected individuals many cell types could potentially serve as viral reservoirs and a successful therapy would allow multilineage protection from infection with particular protection targeted towards T lineage and myeloid lineage cells. HSC based approaches that allow this to occur have been attempted and some are currently under development. Anti-HIV ribozymes, intracellular antibodies, short-hairpin (sh)RNAs, dominant negative proteins, decoy RNAs, and zinc finger nucleases are just a few of the currently applied gene therapy technologies designed to render cells refractory to infection or render them less able to produce progeny viruses [3–5,36–38].

A significant advance toward the clinical implementation of stem cell based HIV therapy is found in a recent study that primarily demonstrated the ability to successfully perform a large- scale phase 2 HSC-based gene therapy trial. In this report, investigators utilized autologous adult HSCs transduced with a retroviral vector containing a tat-vpr-specific anti-HIV ribozyme to attempt to produce cells less prone to productive infection[4]**. While vector-containing cells were detected for prolonged periods of time (>100 weeks in most individuals) and CD4+ T cell counts were higher in the anti-HIV ribozyme treated group versus the placebo group, the effects on viral loads were small. However, the success of this particular study is it's report that a stem cell-based approach such as this can be used as a more conventional and reproducible therapeutic approach. Another recent clinical study used a multipronged RNA-based approach that involved a ribozyme targeted to CCR5, a shRNA targeted to tat/rev transcripts, and a TAR region decoy[5]**. This study represents a significant step forward in that it is one of the first reports that utilized lentiviral-based gene therapy vectors capable of genetically modifying both dividing and non-dividing HSCs and are less likely than murine retroviral-based vectors to cause cellular transformation. The authors document the long-lived engraftment and multilineage hematopoiesis of vector-containing and expressing cells. While antiviral efficacy was not assessed, the authors demonstrated the safety of this strategy; which reflects positively on the future potential of a lentiviral-based approach.

Several other approaches are currently under development and are aimed at protecting cells from direct infection by knocking out CCR5 expression though RNA interference or by zinc finger nucleases [2*,3*]. These approaches capitalize on the importance of CCR5 in primary HIV infection and the observations that individuals lacking CCR5 expression are relatively resistant to infection [3,39–41]. There is further suggestion the CCR5 has a key role in targeted therapy in the report of the “German patient”, an HIV-infected individual who, during treatment for acute myeloid leukemia, received a heterologous transplantation of HSCs derived from a homozogous CCR5−/− donor following myeloablation[42]*. This individual subsequently controlled virus replication in the absence of ART. Whether a scenario such as this is reproducible or practical is under debate, however this observation provides insight as to the potential importance of the CCR5 molecule in HIV infection and in targeted therapeutic intervention. Several CCR5−/− homozygous individuals have been reported to be infected with HIV-1 [43–53], suggesting that the protection incurred by the lack of CCR5 is not complete and that the viruses in these individuals can utilize alternative co-receptors for infection. This fact, as well as the ongoing viral evolution in infected individuals receiving stem cell based therapy, could hamper the efficacy of a CCR5-targeted strategy. However, CCR5 knockout or knockdown represents a potentially important approach as is evident by the observation that CCR5 heterozygous individuals display delayed disease progression [53] and CCR5 levels in sooty mangabeys appear to be correlated to the lack of disease progression following infection of this natural host to the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)smm stains [54]. Thus, a stem cell based approach to knock-down or knock-out CCR5 expression is one strategy that is currently under large-scale investigation; and, coupled with other strategies to control viral replication, has a strong possibility to have a therapeutic benefit.

Engineered antiviral immunity through stem cells

While an approach that blocks the virus from infecting cells of the immune system would ideally allow the regeneration of immune response against HIV, natural immune responses themselves do not possess the inherent ability to prevent infection or clear the virus from the body. Thus, a new focus has been initiated aimed at directing immunity to specifically target HIV in hopes of overcoming the barriers in clearing the virus from the body. These approaches utilize gene therapy-based technologies on peripheral blood cells, to genetically alter cells to express a receptor or a chimeric molecule that allows them to specifically target a particular viral antigen. Many of these approaches simply try to “re-program” cellular immunity, particularly peripheral T cell responses, to target HIV following ex vivo manipulation and re-infusion back into the autologous body [55–58]. Manipulation of peripheral blood T cells from HIV infected individuals has inherent issues that would be necessary to overcome, including the effects that continuous HIV infection and ex vivo manipulation have on the functionality and lifespan of peripheral blood cells. In addition, these genetically altered cells would express their endogenous T cell receptors and the expression of the newly introduced receptor can result in cross-receptor pairing which could produce self-reactive T cells. A stem cell based approach may overcome many of these defects by allowing selective developmental mechanisms to occur that can generate large numbers of HIV-specific cells in a renewable, stable fashion that can reconstitute defective natural immune responses against HIV.

One approach currently under investigation is to program B cells resultant from HSCs to express an anti-HIV neutralizing antibody [59*,60*]. While neutralizing antibodies have been shown to confer some protection from infection in animal studies and broadly neutralizing antibodies have been observed in some HIV infected people, protection from a single engineered antibody would be unprecedented. However, engineered antibody responses may be useful in enhancing certain immune responses, particularly in the mucosal and innate immune compartments and a clinical benefit may be obtained in combination with other strategies. The understanding of antibody binding and virus neutralization may be further useful in designing chimeric receptors or single-chain therapeutic antibodies with recognition domains that can be utilized in other approaches that target cellular immunity towards HIV infected cells[1,61,62]. Thus, genetic engineering of HSCs to produce B cells that secrete a neutralizing anti-HIV antibody or engineering HSCs to allow multilineage hematopoiesis of cells expressing a chimeric cellular receptor containing an antibody recognition domain represent one arm of an “engineered immunity” approach utilizing HSCs.

T cell responses are critical in naturally controlling HIV replication, particularly following the acute stage of infection, and in clearing other types of viral infection[11,12,16]. Engineering T cell responses using HSCs genetically modified with a molecularly cloned T cell receptor or chimeric molecule specific to HIV is another approach in attempting to produce antigen-specific T cells. The fundamental difference in this type of approach is that the cells produced from HSCs following “normal” development in the bone marrow and thymus are subjected to normal central tolerance mechanisms and are antigen specific “naïve” cells, and thus lack the issues of ex-vivo manipulation and functional impairment or exhaustion that other peripheral cell modification methods would have. In this regard, in a proof-of-principle study we have recently demonstrated, using a molecularly cloned T cell receptor specific to an HIV-1 Gag epitope in the context of HLA-A*0201, that HSC modified in this capacity can develop into functional, mature HIV specific CD8+ T cells in human thymic tissue that expresses the appropriate restricting HLA-A*0201 molecule [6]. This demonstrates the feasibility of genetically modifying HSCs with a molecularly cloned receptor and is a step towards the understanding and development of directed T cell responses that could eventually lead to clearing HIV infection from the body in a manner similar to natural immune responses to other viruses and pathogens.

Conclusions

In all, stem cell-based approaches aimed towards the treatment of HIV infection have undergone a renaissance lately and are now a major focus of investigation. Two recent clinical studies highlight the feasibility and reproducibility of performing HSC genetic manipulation and transplantation in an expanded clinical setting. Several technologies are currently under development that target HIV either by protecting the cell from infection or by enhancing immune responses against the virus. Several groups have recently reported that human embryonic stem cells (hESC) can differentiate into the major HIV target cells, T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages [63–68]. As this field progresses and differentiation protocols for these cells become more efficient, totipotent stem cells such as hESC and the recently reported induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) [69–72] may be very useful for gene therapeutic strategies to combat hematopoietic disorders such as HIV disease. It is likely that in the coming years we will see efficacy studies from this next generation of stem cell based approaches that will serve as the basis for further expansion into the use of these strategies in a variety of therapeutic applications for other chronic diseases.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants RO1 AI078806 to SGK, R01 AI070010 to JAZ, California HIV/AIDS Research Program (CHRP) grant 163893 to SGK, California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) grant RC1-00149 and the UCLA Center for AIDS Research P30 AI28697.

Footnotes

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Rossi JJ, June CH, Kohn DB. Genetic therapies against HIV. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1444–1454. [PubMed]

2*. Shimizu S, Hong P, Arumugam B, Pokomo L, Boyer J, Koizumi N, Kittipongdaja P, Chen A, Bristol G, Galic Z, et al. A highly efficient short hairpin RNA potently down-regulates CCR5 expression in systemic lymphoid organs in the hu-BLT mouse model. Blood. 2010;115:1534–1544. [PubMed] This study uses humanized mice to demonstrate the ability of HSCs genetically modified with a shRNA molecule specific to CCR5 to down regulate CCR5 expression in progey cells in the periphery of the mice.

3*. Holt N, Wang J, Kim K, Friedman G, Wang X, Taupin V, Crooks GM, Kohn DB, Gregory PD, Holmes MC, et al. Human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells modified by zinc-finger nucleases targeted to CCR5 control HIV-1 in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:839–847. [PMC free article] [PubMed] Uses zinc finger nuclease technology to knock out CCR5 expression in HSCs implanted in humanized mice, with resultant cells refractory to infection by HIV.

4**. Mitsuyasu R, Merigan TC, Carr A, Zack JA, Winters MA, Workman C, Bloch M, Lalezari J, Becker S, Thornton L, et al. Phase 2 gene therapy trial of an anti-HIV ribozyme in autologous CD34+ cells. Nature Medicine. 2009;15:285–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] Demonstration of large-scale appilcation and practicality of HSC-based gene therapy trial.

5**. DiGiusto DL, Krishnan A, Li L, Li H, Li S, Rao A, Mi S, Yam P, Stinson S, Kalos M, et al. RNA-based gene therapy for HIV with lentiviral vector-modified CD34(+) cells in patients undergoing transplantation for AIDS-related lymphoma. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:36ra43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] Description of the use of lentiviral vector-based gene therapy using human HSCs with prolonged genetic making in progeny cells.

6*. Kitchen SG, Bennett M, Galic Z, Kim J, Xu Q, Young A, Lieberman A, Joseph A, Goldstein H, Ng H, et al. Engineering antigen-specific T cells from genetically modified human hematopoietic stem cells in immunodeficient mice. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] This proof-of-principle study described the ability of human HSCs genetically modified with a molecularly cloned, HIV specific T cell receptor to differentiate in the human thymus into antigen specific CD8+ T cells.

7. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Aljurf M, Pasquini MC, Bouzas LF, Yoshimi A, Szer J, Lipton J, Schwendener A, Gratwohl M, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective. JAMA. 303:1617–1624. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

8. Brenchley JM, Silvestri G, Douek DC. Nonprogressive and progressive primate immunodeficiency lentivirus infections. Immunity. 32:737–742. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

9. Haase AT. Targeting early infection to prevent HIV-1 mucosal transmission. Nature. 464:217–223. [PubMed]

10. Ahlers JD, Belyakov IM. Lessons learned from natural infection: focusing on the design of protective T cell vaccines for HIV/AIDS. Trends Immunol. 2010 epub, In press. [PubMed]

11. Goonetilleke N, Liu MK, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Ferrari G, Giorgi E, Ganusov VV, Keele BF, Learn GH, Turnbull EL, Salazar MG, et al. The first T cell response to transmitted/founder virus contributes to the control of acute viremia in HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1253–1272. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

12. Streeck H, Jolin JS, Qi Y, Yassine-Diab B, Johnson RC, Kwon DS, Addo MM, Brumme C, Routy JP, Little S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific CD8+ T-cell responses during primary infection are major determinants of the viral set point and loss of CD4+ T cells. J Virol. 2009;83:7641–7648. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

13. Li Q, Skinner PJ, Ha SJ, Duan L, Mattila TL, Hage A, White C, Barber DL, O'Mara L, Southern PJ, et al. Visualizing antigen-specific and infected cells in situ predicts outcomes in early viral infection. Science. 2009;323:1726–1729. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

14. Goulder PJ, Watkins DI. Impact of MHC class I diversity on immune control of immunodeficiency virus replication. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:619–630. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

15. Seder RA, Darrah PA, Roederer M. T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for vaccine design. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:247–258. [PubMed]

16. Virgin HW, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. Redefining chronic viral infection. Cell. 2009;138:30–50. [PubMed]

17. Kelley CF, Kitchen CM, Hunt PW, Rodriguez B, Hecht FM, Kitahata M, Crane HM, Willig J, Mugavero M, Saag M, et al. Incomplete peripheral CD4+ cell count restoration in HIV-infected patients receiving long-term antiretroviral treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:787–794. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

18. Battegay M, Nuesch R, Hirschel B, Kaufmann GR. Immunological recovery and antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:280–287. [PubMed]

19. Muller M, Wandel S, Colebunders R, Attia S, Furrer H, Egger M. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients starting antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 10:251–261. [PubMed]

20. Antonelli LR, Mahnke Y, Hodge JN, Porter BO, Barber DL, Dersimonian R, Greenwald JH, Roby G, Mican J, Sher A, et al. Elevated frequencies of highly activated CD4+ T cells in HIV+ patients developing immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Blood [PubMed]

21. Maddon PJ, Littman DR, Godfrey M, Maddon DE, Chess L, Axel R. The isolation and nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding the T cell surface protein T4: a new member of the immunoglobulin gene family. Cell. 1985;42:93–104. [PubMed]

22. Brenchley JM, Hill BJ, Ambrozak DR, Price DA, Guenaga FJ, Casazza JP, Kuruppu J, Yazdani J, Migueles SA, Connors M, et al. T-cell subsets that harbor human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in vivo: implications for HIV pathogenesis. J Virol. 2004;78:1160–1168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

23. Kitchen SG, Jones NR, LaForge S, Whitmire JK, Vu BA, Galic Z, Brooks DG, Brown SJ, Kitchen CM, Zack JA. CD4 on CD8+ T cells directly enhances effector function and is a target for HIV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8727–8732. [PubMed]

24. Carter CC, Onafuwa-Nuga A, McNamara LA, Riddell Jt, Bixby D, Savona MR, Collins KL. HIV-1 infects multipotent progenitor cells causing cell death and establishing latent cellular reservoirs. Nat Med. 2010;16:446–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

25. Louache F, Debili N, Marandin A, Coulombel L, Vainchenker W. Expression of CD4 by human hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 1994;84:3344–3355. [PubMed]

26. Muench MO, Roncarolo MG, Namikawa R. Phenotypic and functional evidence for the expression of CD4 by hematopoietic stem cells isolated from human fetal liver. Blood. 1997;89:1364–1375. [PubMed]

27. Moir S, Lapointe R, Malaspina A, Ostrowski M, Cole CE, Chun T-W, Adelsberger J, Baseler M, Hwu P, Fauci AS. CD40-Mediated Induction of CD4 and CXCR4 on B Lymphocytes Correlates with Restricted Susceptibility to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection: Potential Role of B Lymphocytes as a Viral Reservoir. J. Virol. 1999;73:7972–7980. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

28. Valentin A, Rosati M, Patenaude DJ, Hatzakis A, Kostrikis LG, Lazanas M, Wyvill KM, Yarchoan R, Pavlakis GN. Persistent HIV-1 infection of natural killer cells in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:7015–7020. [PubMed]

29. Bernstein HB, Plasterer MC, Schiff SE, Kitchen CMR, Kitchen SG, Zack JA. The CD4 molecule enhances NK cell migration and cytokine production, playing a functional role on NK cells. Manuscript in Submission. 2006

30. Lucey DR, Dorsky DI, Nicholson-Weller A, Weller PF. Human eosinophils express CD4 protein and bind human immunodeficiency virus 1 gp120. J Exp Med. 1989;169:327–332. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

31. Filion LG, Izaguirre CA, Garber GE, Huebsh L, Aye MT. Detection of surface and cytoplasmic CD4 on blood monocytes from normal and HIV-1 infected individuals. J Immunol Methods. 1990;135:59–69. [PubMed]

32. Biswas P, Mantelli B, Sica A, Malnati M, Panzeri C, Saccani A, Hasson H, Vecchi A, Saniabadi A, Lusso P, et al. Expression of CD4 on human peripheral blood neutrophils. Blood. 2003;101:4452–4456. [PubMed]

33. Li Y, Li L, Wadley R, Reddel SW, Qi JC, Archis C, Collins A, Clark E, Cooley M, Kouts S, et al. Mast cells/basophils in the peripheral blood of allergic individuals who are HIV-1 susceptible due to their surface expression of CD4 and the chemokine receptors CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4. Blood. 2001;97:3484–3490. [PubMed]

34. O'Doherty U, Steinman RM, Peng M, Cameron PU, Gezelter S, Kopeloff I, Swiggard WJ, Pope M, Bhardwaj N. Dendritic cells freshly isolated from human blood express CD4 and mature into typical immunostimulatory dendritic cells after culture in monocyte-conditioned medium. J Exp Med. 1993;178:1067–1076. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

35. Jordan CA, Watkins BA, Kufta C, Dubois-Dalcq M. Infection of brain microglial cells by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is CD4 dependent. J Virol. 1991;65:736–742. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

36. Asparuhova MB, Barde I, Trono D, Schranz K, Schumperli D. Development and characterization of a triple combination gene therapy vector inhibiting HIV-1 multiplication. J Gene Med. 2008;10:1059–1070. [PubMed]

37. Hammer D, Wild J, Ludwig C, Asbach B, Notka F, Wagner R. Fusion of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1-derived glycine-alanine repeat to trans-dominant HIV-1 Gag increases inhibitory activities and survival of transduced cells in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19:622–634. [PubMed]

38. Shimizu S, Kamata M, Kittipongdaja P, Chen KN, Kim S, Pang S, Boyer J, Qin FX, An DS, Chen IS. Characterization of a potent non-cytotoxic shRNA directed to the HIV-1 co-receptor CCR5. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2009;7:8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

39. Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, Huttley GA, Smith MW, Allikmets R, Goedert JJ, Buchbinder SP, Vittinghoff E, Gomperts E, et al. Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study, San Francisco City Cohort, ALIVE Study. Science. 1996;273:1856–1862. [PubMed]

40. Huang Y, Paxton WA, Wolinsky SM, Neumann AU, Zhang L, He T, Kang S, Ceradini D, Jin Z, Yazdanbakhsh K, et al. The role of a mutant CCR5 allele in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. Nat Med. 1996;2:1240–1243. [PubMed]

41. Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, Rucker J, Liesnard C, Farber CM, Saragosti S, Lapoumeroulie C, Cognaux J, Forceille C, et al. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. 1996;382:722–725. [PubMed]

42*. Hutter G, Nowak D, Mossner M, Ganepola S, Mussig A, Allers K, Schneider T, Hofmann J, Kucherer C, Blau O, et al. Long-term control of HIV by CCR5 Delta32/Delta32 stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:692–698. [PubMed] Report of the “German Patient”, the HIV+ individual who received human HSCs from a CCR5−/− donor following myeloablation and subsequently shows long term viral suppression.

43. Alkhatib G. The biology of CCR5 and CXCR4. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2009;4:96–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

44. Kuipers H, Workman C, Dyer W, Geczy A, Sullivan J, Oelrichs R. An HIV-1-infected individual homozygous for the CCR-5 delta32 allele and the SDF-1 3'A allele. Aids. 1999;13:433–434. [PubMed]

45. Gorry PR, Zhang C, Wu S, Kunstman K, Trachtenberg E, Phair J, Wolinsky S, Gabuzda D. Persistence of dual-tropic HIV-1 in an individual homozygous for the CCR5 Delta 32 allele. Lancet. 2002;359:1832–1834. [PubMed]

46. Biti R, Ffrench R, Young J, Bennetts B, Stewart G, Liang T. HIV-1 infection in an individual homozygous for the CCR5 deletion allele. Nat Med. 1997;3:252–253. [PubMed]

47. Balotta C, Bagnarelli P, Violin M, Ridolfo AL, Zhou D, Berlusconi A, Corvasce S, Corbellino M, Clementi M, Clerici M, et al. Homozygous delta 32 deletion of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene in an HIV-1-infected patient. 1997;11:F67–F71. [PubMed]

48. O'Brien TR, Winkler C, Dean M, Nelson JA, Carrington M, Michael NL, White GC., 2nd HIV-1 infection in a man homozygous for CCR5 delta 32. Lancet. 1997;349:1219. [PubMed]

49. Theodorou I, Meyer L, Magierowska M, Katlama C, Rouzioux C. HIV-1 infection in an individual homozygous for CCR5 delta 32. Seroco Study Group. Lancet. 1997;349:1219–1220. [PubMed]

50. Sheppard HW, Celum C, Michael NL, O'Brien S, Dean M, Carrington M, Dondero D, Buchbinder SP. HIV-1 infection in individuals with the CCR5-Delta32/Delta32 genotype: acquisition of syncytium-inducing virus at seroconversion. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29:307–313. [PubMed]

51. Michael NL, Nelson JA, KewalRamani VN, Chang G, O'Brien SJ, Mascola JR, Volsky B, Louder M, White GC, 2nd, Littman DR, et al. Exclusive and persistent use of the entry coreceptor CXCR4 by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from a subject homozygous for CCR5 delta32. J Virol. 1998;72:6040–6047. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

52. Naif HM, Cunningham AL, Alali M, Li S, Nasr N, Buhler MM, Schols D, de Clercq E, Stewart G. A human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolate from an infected person homozygous for CCR5Delta32 exhibits dual tropism by infecting macrophages and MT2 cells via CXCR4. J Virol. 2002;76:3114–3124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

53. Oh DY, Jessen H, Kucherer C, Neumann K, Oh N, Poggensee G, Bartmeyer B, Jessen A, Pruss A, Schumann RR, et al. CCR5Delta32 genotypes in a German HIV-1 seroconverter cohort and report of HIV-1 infection in a CCR5Delta32 homozygous individual. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2747. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

54. Brenchley JM, Silvestri G, Douek DC. Nonprogressive and Progressive Primate Immunodeficiency Lentivirus Infections. Immunity. 32:737–742. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

55. Varela-Rohena A, Molloy PE, Dunn SM, Li Y, Suhoski MM, Carroll RG, Milicic A, Mahon T, Sutton DH, Laugel B, et al. Control of HIV-1 immune escape by CD8 T cells expressing enhanced T-cell receptor. Nat Med. 2008;14:1390–1395. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

56. Joseph A, Zheng JH, Follenzi A, Dilorenzo T, Sango K, Hyman J, Chen K, Piechocka-Trocha A, Brander C, Hooijberg E, et al. Lentiviral vectors encoding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T-cell receptor genes efficiently convert peripheral blood CD8 T lymphocytes into cytotoxic T lymphocytes with potent in vitro and in vivo HIV-1-specific inhibitory activity. J Virol. 2008;82:3078–3089. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

57. Miles JJ, Silins SL, Burrows SR. Engineered T cell receptors and their potential in molecular medicine. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13:2725–2736. [PubMed]

58. Cooper LJ, Kalos M, Lewinsohn DA, Riddell SR, Greenberg PD. Transfer of specificity for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 into primary human T lymphocytes by introduction of T-cell receptor genes. J Virol. 2000;74:8207–8212. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

59*. Luo XM, Maarschalk E, O'Connell RM, Wang P, Yang L, Baltimore D. Engineering human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells to produce a broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibody after in vitro maturation to human B lymphocytes. Blood. 2009;113:1422–1431. [PubMed] Describes the introduction of a molecularly cloned, HIV-specific neutralizing antibody into HSCs followed by their development into antibody producing B cell in vitro.

60*. Joseph A, Zheng JH, Chen K, Dutta M, Chen C, Stiegler G, Kunert R, Follenzi A, Goldstein H. Inhibition of in vivo HIV infection in humanized mice by gene therapy of human hematopoietic stem cells with a lentiviral vector encoding a broadly neutralizing anti-HIV antibody. J Virol. 2010;84:6645–6653. [PMC free article] [PubMed] Demonstrated development of functional antibody secreting cells from human HSCs genetically modified with a HIV-specific neutralizing antibody implanted into chimeric humanized mice. The expression of the HIV antibody is demonstrated to lower HIV replication in the humanized mice expressing them.

61. Roberts MR, Qin L, Zhang D, Smith DH, Tran AC, Dull TJ, Groopman JE, Capon DJ, Byrn RA, Finer MH. Targeting of human immunodeficiency virus-infected cells by CD8+ T lymphocytes armed with universal T-cell receptors. Blood. 1994;84:2878–2889. [PubMed]

62. Yang OO, Tran AC, Kalams SA, Johnson RP, Roberts MR, Walker BD. Lysis of HIV-1-infected cells and inhibition of viral replication by universal receptor T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94:11478–11483. [PubMed]

63. Timmermans F, Velghe I, Vanwalleghem L, De Smedt M, Van Coppernolle S, Taghon T, Moore HD, Leclercq G, Langerak AW, Kerre T, et al. Generation of T cells from human embryonic stem cell-derived hematopoietic zones. J Immunol. 2009;182:6879–6888. [PubMed]

64. Galic Z, Kitchen SG, Kacena A, Subramanian A, Burke B, Cortado R, Zack JA. T lineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11742–11747. [PubMed]

65. Galic Z, Kitchen SG, Subramanian A, Bristol G, Marsden MD, Balamurugan A, Kacena A, Yang O, Zack JA. Generation of T lineage cells from human embryonic stem cells in a feeder free system. Stem Cells. 2009;27:100–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

66. Bandi S, Akkina R. Human embryonic stem cell (hES) derived dendritic cells are functionally normal and are susceptible to HIV-1 infection. AIDS Res Ther. 2008;5:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

67. Subramanian A, Guo B, Marsden MD, Galic Z, Kitchen S, Kacena A, Brown HJ, Cheng G, Zack JA. Macrophage differentiation from embryoid bodies derived from human embryonic stem cells. J Stem Cells. 2009;4:29–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

68. Anderson JS, Bandi S, Kaufman DS, Akkina R. Derivation of normal macrophages from human embryonic stem (hES) cells for applications in HIV gene therapy. Retrovirology. 2006;3:24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

69. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–872. [PubMed]

70. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318:1917–1920. [PubMed]

71. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, Ince TA, Lerou PH, Lensch MW, Daley GQ. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature. 2008;451:141–146. [PubMed]

72. Lowry WE, Richter L, Yachechko R, Pyle AD, Tchieu J, Sridharan R, Clark AT, Plath K. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105:2883–2888. [PubMed]