Cutaneous malignant melanoma is predominantly a disease of fair-skinned individuals. Aetiology is complex, with environmental (mainly ultraviolet radiation exposure) and genetic factors affecting disease risk. Phenotypic risk factors, which are largely heritable, include pigmentation (fair skin, blue or green eyes, blonde or red hair), sun sensitivity, an inability to tan
3–6, high number of melanocytic naevi
7,8, or the presence of clinically atypical naevi
7. Candidate-gene studies and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for melanoma and these melanoma-associated phenotypes have identified several variants associated with melanoma risk in the general population
9–13. Family studies, on the other hand, have identified only two high-penetrance melanoma genes,
CDKN2A (ref.
1) and
CDK4 (ref.
2), accounting for a minority of genetic risk in melanoma families.
As part of a larger sequencing effort to identify novel melanoma risk genes, we sequenced the genome of an affected individual from an eight-case melanoma family negative for alterations in
CDKN2A or
CDK4 (, FAM1) using a nanoarray-based short-read sequencing-by-ligation strategy
14. From among the 410 novel variants predicted to affect protein structure, we prioritized for follow-up a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) resulting in a glutamic acid to lysine substitution in MITF (E318K, codon numbering based on the melanocyte-specific MITF-M isoform; c.G1075A, NCBI accession NM_000248.3; p.E318K, NCBI accession NP_000239.1; rs149617956). Although linkage
15 and GWAS studies
9,10 have not provided evidence implicating
MITF in either predisposition to melanoma or the melanoma-associated phenotypes of pigmentation and naevogenesis
11,12,16–19, MITF is known to regulate a broad repertoire of genes whose functions in melanocytes range from development, differentiation, survival, cell-cycle regulation and pigment production.
MITF is somatically amplified
20,21 or mutated
22 in a subset of melanomas, and strongly overexpressed in others
20, making it an attractive candidate despite the lack of prior evidence for involvement in germline risk.
We evaluated whether
MITF E318K is a high-penetrance melanoma susceptibility variant in Family 1 by genotyping the remaining affected individuals available for study. The
MITF variant allele was found in 3/7 melanoma cases assessed in this family (), consistent with it being a medium-penetrance melanoma risk variant. To assess further this possibility, we genotyped two large Australian melanoma case–control samples for
MITF E318K. The variant was found in 14/1,953 controls (carrier frequency = 0.0072) and thus represents a rare population variant (). We observed a significantly higher frequency (34/2,059) in cases (carrier frequency = 0.0165) than controls (Fisher exact
P = 0.008, odds ratio (OR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–4.70), indicating that the variant correlates with increased melanoma risk in the general population. The effect size for E318K is larger than those reported for variants from melanoma GWAS
9,10 and similar to that observed for red-hair-colour-associated variants of the melanocortin 1 receptor (
MC1R) gene (OR for most populations ~2.4)
23. Among cases, the
MITF E318K variant was enriched in those with multiple primary melanomas (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.52–10.91), a family history of melanoma (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.23–6.92), or both (OR 8.37, 95% CI 2.58–23.80), but not in cases with earlier age of onset (comparing diagnosis before age 40 versus after 40 years) ().
| Table 1MITF E318K association with melanoma |
| Table 2Association of MITF E318K with melanoma-associated variables |
We replicated these findings in two independent population-based case–control samples from the United Kingdom. In the combined UK sample, the variant allele frequency was also significantly higher in cases (carrier frequency = 0.0176) than controls (carrier frequency = 0.0085, P = 0.012, OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.14–3.94, ). The association with melanoma in the pooled UK and Australian data was highly significant (combined P = 0.0003, OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.41–3.45). In the UK cases there were also trends towards family history, earlier age of onset, and the occurrence of more than one primary melanoma in variant carriers ().
To extend assessment of the MITF variant in melanoma-prone families, we screened for E318K in 182 UK families with at least two melanoma cases and 88 Australian families with at least three cases, all of which are negative for mutations in
CDKN2A or
CDK4. Six families (2.2%) were found to carry the variant. In the UK, E318K was enriched in the more melanoma-dense families; 4/54 (7.4%) families with at least three melanoma cases versus 1/128 (0.8%) families with two melanoma cases (Fisher’s exact
P = 0.013). We subsequently evaluated whether
MITF E318K co-segregated with melanoma in these as well as additional multiple-case families identified from the case–control sample. In total, we identified 31 unrelated cases carrying
MITF E318K from Australia and the UK with at least one first- or second-degree relative diagnosed with melanoma (listed in
Supplementary Table 1;
Supplementary Fig. 3), 22 of which had DNA available from additional affected family members for genotyping. In 9/31 families (five three-case and four two-case families) the variant was found in all affected individuals (
Supplementary Fig. 3a; non-segregating families shown in
Supplementary Fig. 3b), whereas in 12 additional families, the variant co-segregated with melanoma in the available cases, but DNA from all cases was not available for screening (
Supplementary Fig. 3c). To test more formally for linkage of melanoma with
MITF E318K in these families, we calculated a lod score of 2.7 under a dominant model, again consistent with an incompletely penetrant medium risk variant.
To assess whether the
MITF variant is related to known melanoma-associated risk phenotypes of pigmentation and naevus count, we tested for association both in cases and controls from the Australian and British populations. The
MITF variant allele is significantly associated with increased naevus count (combined
P = 0.002, OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.42–4.55;
Supplementary Table 2) and non-blue eye colour (combined
P = 0.018, OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.11–3.81;
Supplementary Table 3). It was not associated with skin colour, hair colour, or freckling (
Supplementary Table 4). Reassessing the case–control analysis accounting for naevus count and eye colour gave a slightly reduced effect size for association of the variant with melanoma (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.85–3.92), suggesting that the risk of melanoma attributable to
MITF E318K may be mediated at least in part via one or both of these phenotypes, but that there is a substantial residual risk conferred by the variant through an as yet undetermined mechanism.
We next sought to evaluate whether the E318K mutation alters MITF function. The E318K variant is located within one of two IKXE consensus sites on MITF previously shown to be post-translationally modified by the addition of the small ubiquitin-like-modifier SUMO
24. Mutation of the residue to which SUMO is covalently attached in this motif (K316R) has previously been shown to abrogate MITF sumoylation and significantly increase MITF transcriptional activity
in vitro24,25. We thus hypothesized that E318K would similarly alter sumoylation and transcriptional activity of MITF. To test this we constructed a cDNA encoding His-tagged MITF carrying the E318K mutation. We evaluated the effects of E318K on sumoylation in comparison to the wild type and previously characterized synthetic mutations of the two known MITF sumoylation sites (K316R and K182R) by co-transfecting with haemagglutinin (HA)-tagged SUMO1 in COS-7 cells (). Wild-type MITF shows two SUMO1-modified forms, whereas MITF mutants K182R or K316R each show only one modified form (). Similar to the synthetic K316R and K182R mutants, E318K abrogates sumoylation, resulting in complete loss of the doubly sumoylated form of MITF and reducing the mono-sumoylated form. When the second site is mutated (K182R) simultaneously with E318K, MITF sumoylation is completely abolished. Immunoprecipitation of endogenously expressed MITF E318K from melanoma cells homozygous for E318K (NAE) when transfected with SUMO similarly revealed only bands corresponding to mono- and non-sumoylated isoforms of MITF on western blot ().
We then looked for differences between mutant and wild-type MITF transcriptional activity using a reporter construct containing the MITF-responsive
TRPM1 promoter
25. At two concentrations tested, the E318K mutant exhibited 1.34–1.40 fold induction of the
TRPM1 luciferase reporter relative to wild-type MITF (). This fold induction is similar to that observed previously on multiple MITF target promoters using single or double artificial sumoylation-site MITF mutants
24,25 and suggests that the E318K variant found in melanoma changes the transcriptional potency of MITF. To study this in greater detail, we determined the effect of the E318K mutation on global MITF target gene transcription. We developed a tetracycline-inducible system for expression of wild-type MITF or the E318K variant in melanoma cell lines with constitutively low or undetectable levels of endogenous MITF (HT144 and C32, respectively
26, ). At the phenotypic level, induction of wild-type or E318K MITF led to increased proliferation compared to uninduced controls for each of the cell lines, although there was no significant difference in growth rate between the cells expressing the different isoforms (data not shown). We examined whole-genome expression profiles in these cells following induction of either wild-type or E318K MITF for 48 h. Of the 37 genes commonly regulated by wild-type and E318K MITF in both cell lines (
Supplementary Fig. 1a, b; see Methods for analysis details), 28 (76%) had previously been identified as MITF target genes (
Supplementary Table 5)
27,28, and 17 showed ≥1.25-fold differences in expression between the wild-type and E318K isoforms (
Supplementary Fig. 1b). We also identified two gene products that were uniquely differentially regulated compared to uninduced cells by the induction of wild-type MITF but not MITF E318K in both parental cell lines, and 16 gene products after induction of MITF E318K but not wild-type MITF (
Supplementary Table 6). Of these, 61% (11/18) have previously been reported as MITF targets (
Supplementary Table 6)
27,28. Collectively, these data indicate that the MITF E318K mutant exhibits differential transcriptional activity against some, although not all, target genes. In agreement with the reporter assays (), we identified transcriptional differences in gene products known to be involved in pigmentation (
DCT,
MLANA), in which the differences were more marked with expression of the E318K variant in comparison to wild-type MITF. These were validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction with reverse transcription (qRT–PCR) in the cell lines used for microarray analysis (), as well as in an additional melanoma cell line constitutively expressing wild-type or E318K mutant MITF ( and
Supplementary Fig. 2). In keeping with the increase in expression of these pigmentation genes, we detected a 22% increase in melanin content in HT-144 melanoma cells 72 h after induction of MITF E318K compared to wild-type MITF (data not shown). This is also consistent with our observation that carriers are more likely to have darker (that is, non-blue) eye colour (
Supplementary Table 3) but, notably, these data contrast with other previously reported ‘fair-skin-associated’ melanoma risk variants, such as those in
MC1R or
TYR. It is uncertain whether the enhanced expression of pigment genes may contribute to melanomagenesis, perhaps by increasing oxidative stress and an increase in oxidative DNA damage
29, or alternatively may simply reflect increased MITF activity, which (separately) promotes tumorigenesis, as
MITF is a previously recognized amplified melanoma oncogene
20.
We adopted the approach of whole-genome sequencing of patients from melanoma families and identified a novel germline mutation of
MITF. This mutation was found to be present in numerous melanoma families, as well as the general population, in which its association with melanoma has an effect size similar to red-hair-causing variants of
MC1R23. The melanoma susceptibility genes discovered through GWAS so far account for only a minority of inherited disease risk. A proportion of this ‘missing heritability’ may be due to rare sequence variants, which are poorly detected by GWAS using SNP arrays. The new
MITF variant reported here shows reasonably strong linkage to melanoma (lod score 2.7) but crucially not a high enough signal to be clearly visible in previous genome-wide linkage scans. We also provide
in vitro data supporting a functional mechanism by which this mutation may mediate melanoma risk, specifically abrogation of MITF sumoylation and differential transcription of select MITF target genes. Although the individual changes in transcription induced by the mutant E318K MITF in comparison to wild-type MITF are modest, the orchestrated change in the levels of multiple MITF target genes is likely to be biologically important, especially over the lifetime of a person. This study offers a rare glimpse of a complex functionality whereby a risk-conferring SNP affects the post-translational processing of a crucial lineage-specific survival and differentiation gene. This study demonstrates the utility of performing whole-genome and exome resequencing in appropriate affected individuals to identify such novel rare disease-specific variants and functionally characterize variants associated with complex disease not otherwise detectable via GWAS or linkage approaches.