Our studies
[4],
[8] and others
[26] have revealed an important role for the chlamydial plasmid in the expression of key virulence properties by both
C. muridarum and
C. trachomatis. However the role of the resident plasmid in other Chlamydiaceae has not been investigated. Strains of
C. pneumoniae infecting humans generally lack the plasmid, but it is present in strains that infect a diverse range of other mammals including horses
[30] and koalas
[31]. Recent studies of
C. felis clinical isolates indicate that plasmid carriage is highly conserved
[32] in this species suggesting that the plasmid may be important for virulence, and although the plasmid appears conserved in
C. psittaci, plasmid-deficient strains have been described
[33]. In this study we investigated the role of the plasmid in
C. caviae, a natural pathogen of the guinea pig, by curing GPIC of pCpGP1 to derive strain CC13 and by examining CC13′s ability to cause infection and genital tract disease.
Three plasmid-associated phenotypes have been identified in
C. muridarum and are conserved in
C. trachomatis: plasmid-deficient strains are unable to accumulate glycogen within the intracellular inclusion during the developmental cycle, display reduced infectivity in vitro
[3], and in vivo
[4] and do not stimulate TLR2 signaling during infection
[4]. Whether the effectors of these phenotypes are encoded directly by the plasmid is unknown, but we have identified a conserved group of plasmid-responsive loci encoded on the chromosome that may also contribute to the expression or regulation of these traits
[8]. Microarray screening using a custom GPIC array indicated that the transcriptional profile of CC13 very closely resembled that of its parent, but we nevertheless observed that several of the PRCL identified in plasmid-deficient
C. muridarum and C. trachomatis were also differentially transcribed in CC13 including CCA00523-525 (orthologous to CT142-44 and TC_419-421), and CCA00259 (orthologous to CT382.1). However, other candidate PRCL such as the CT084 (TC_0357) ortholog CCA00453, and the CT702 (TC_075) ortholog CCA00924 did not differ transcriptionally from GPIC. Mild reduction in transcription of CCA00416-17 (orthologous to CT049-50 and [TC_319-320]) was detected that did not reach significance. Furthermore, transcription of
glgA appeared slightly but significantly elevated (~2 fold) in
C. caviae CC13. The significance of this observation is unclear because glycogen accumulation within wild-type
C. caviae inclusions is not observed and glycogen production by this chlamydial species has not been detected
[34] but indicates that
glgA transcription is not plasmid-dependent in
C. caviae, more closely resembling what we have previously observed for
C. muridarum.Phenotypic analysis of CC13 in vitro revealed that loss of pCpGP1 did not impact plaque size or plaquing efficiency. GPIC, in common with
C. pneumoniae and
C. psittaci, does not accumulate glycogen intrainclusionally
[15], so no change in iodine-staining phenotype was anticipated and was not observed (data not shown). Most significantly, CC13 retained the ability to activate TLR2 expressed on stably transfected HEK293 epithelial cells, an observation that contrasted with the plasmid-cured strains CM972 and CTD153 that are unable to stimulate TLR2-dependent signaling in vitro and in vivo
[4],
[8]. The overall conservation of chlamydial plasmid organization suggests that the plasmid may not encode a pathogenic TLR2 ligand directly and further, that the conservation of plasmid-responsiveness for CCA00523-25 and CCA00259 indicates that their expression is likely not required for TLR2 activation, reducing the likelihood that their orthologs encode candidate TLR2 ligands in
C. trachomatis or
C. muridarum. Alternatively, is also possible that GPIC encodes additional TLR2 ligands that are unaffected by the absence of the plasmid, preventing detection of differential TLR2 signaling effects as are observed in plasmid-cured
C. trachomatis and
C. muridarum. In support of this hypothesis, we observed that GPIC and CC13 activated TLR2 ~100 fold more effectively than
C. muridarum Nigg, reflecting the expression of a potent, plasmid-independent TLR2 ligand by
C. caviae.
CC13 and GPIC both displayed a strongly pro-inflammatory profile in dendritic cells. Consistent with our observation that
C. caviae expresses a potent, plasmid-independent TLR2 ligand we detected strong induction of both TNF-α and IL-6 by BMDDCs in response to incubation with GPIC and CC13.
C. caviae strongly induced IL-1β production by BMDDCs while
C. muridarum did not. Prestimulation with TLR ligands is required for IL-1β production during infection of macrophages with
C. muridarum [35]. The high levels produced by BMDDCs infected with GPIC or CC13 suggests
C. caviae is able to independently prime and induce release of IL-1β in these cells, unlike
C. muridarum. Thus, it appears that in addition to a lack of plasmid-control for TLR2 activation, stimulatory pathways are activated by
C. caviae differentially when compared to
C. muridarum.In light of our discovery that TLR2 signaling and infectivity were unimpaired in CC13 despite the absence of pCpGP1, it was not surprising that we were unable to demonstrate any significant attenuation in the guinea pig model of genital tract infection. Only with the potentiating effects of estradiol treatment were we able to detect a minor shortening in the course of infection and a slight reduction in upper genital tract bacterial load. Ultimately, these differences were not sufficient to drive differences in the development of oviduct immunopathology. Intra-abdominal adhesions were noted in animals in both groups and were likely the result of prolonged inflammation caused by the enhanced bacterial burden associated with administration of estradiol.
Comparisons of the effects of plasmid-curing on
C. trachomatis,
C. muridarum and
C. caviae gene expression, regulation and virulence indicate significant differences that may be important for understanding the outcome of genital tract infection with these pathogens (). The overall similarity of both plasmid organization and sequence homology is high. Recent phylogenetic analysis of the plasmids expressed by 6 of the 9 chlamydial species indicates that they group distinctly, in a manner greatly resembling their genomes, with the plasmids obtained from
C. pneumoniae strains most closely related to each other and to a lesser extent to those carried by
C. psittaci,
C. felis and
C. caviae, and finally
C. muridarum and
C. trachomatis isolates
[31]. With such genetic similarity, how can we account for the differences in phenotype that we have observed in plasmid-cured strains? If the plasmid encodes effectors of chlamydial virulence directly, why aren't these phenotypes conserved in all species that carry the plasmid? Carlson et al.
[26] proposed that the plasmid encodes a transcriptional regulator, and we have identified a conserved sub-population of chromosomal loci that are under its control
[8]. However, we observed only partial conservation of plasmid-dependence for these genes in
C. caviae and if these are effectors of these phenotypes in
C. muridarum and
C. trachomatis, then this is a likely explanation of the failure of plasmid-curing to alter
C. caviae virulence.
Interestingly, we observed significant reduction of all candidate PRCL transcription in GPIC in response to 2DG treatment, indicating that
C. caviae, like
C. trachomatis, alters gene expression in response to an environment in which glucose is limiting. Furthermore, this response persisted in the cured CC13 strain indicating that this process is plasmid independent. Consequently,
glgA expression was plasmid-insensitive but glucose-limited by
C. caviae, a novel transcriptional profile that contrasts with our observations for both
C. trachomatis where
glgA transcription is both plasmid and glucose sensitive and
C. muridarum where
glgA transcription is unaltered in response to plasmid loss or glucose limitation
[8]. This may reflect a glucose-responsive regulatory pathway evolving within
Chlamydiaceae to facilitate modulation of non-essential, plasmid-associated, virulence gene expression. This is a common theme in bacterial pathogens where expression of virulence loci may be tightly controlled in response to environmental signals such as temperature
[36], nutrient limitation
[37], carbon availability
[38], or phosphate homeostasis
[39]. In the context of such a model, it appears that
C. muridarum has not co-evolved or has dispensed with the transcriptional controls exerted by this pathway with the result that transcription of PRCL remains constitutively active in glucose-limiting conditions
[8]. If true, this may explain the high incidence of upper reproductive tract pathology observed in the mouse model
[21] while human infection is predominantly sub-clinical and reproductive tract sequelae relatively uncommon
[40]. Indeed, it may be worth noting that neither
C. caviae nor
C. muridarum are natural pathogens of the genital tract, infecting the eye and respiratory tract of their respective hosts, so coordination of virulence-associated gene expression in response to glucose availability might not be relevant for these sites. Our preliminary observations indicate that TLR2 signaling by
C. trachomatis but not by
C. muridarum is impaired when the chlamydiae have been cultured under glucose-restricted conditions
[8], but until the pathogenic TLR2 ligand(s) have been identified, limited or altered expression of the TLR2 ligand(s) cannot be confirmed. If correct, then identification and characterization of the regulatory factor(s) encoded by the plasmid and those involved in the chlamydial carbon response will greatly advance our understanding of this important virulence process.