The cellular response to thermal loading at cryogenic temperatures is a complex thermophysical process, i.e. heat transfer process coupled with phase change, moving phase interface (Stefan problem), mass transport (e.g. water) owing to osmotic pressure difference and volume change on freezing (
Zhang et al. 2006). These thermophysical events (e.g. ice formation, vitrification) are generally manipulated with chemical adjuvants (e.g. cryoprotective agents (CPAs), antifreeze protein) to improve the cryopreservation outcome. For example, CPAs (e.g. trehalose, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), glycerol, propanediol) have been found to improve the survivability of cryopreserved mammalian cells (
Eroglu et al. 2000) and reduce the impact of the freezing process on tissue function (
Neidert et al. 2004).
Cryopreservation involves four steps: CPA loading, freezing, thawing and CPA unloading. Slow freezing (approx. −1

°C

min
−1) and vitrification (approx. −100

°C

min
−1, transition from liquid state to glass state without forming crystals) are two currently widely used methods (
Karlsson & Toner 2000). Both methods aim to minimize or eliminate cell damage during cryopreservation by minimizing the intracellular ice crystal formation. Slow freezing usually takes advantage of low concentrations of CPAs (1–2

M), offering low chemical toxicity and osmotic shock to cells (
Parkening et al. 1976;
Karlsson & Toner 1996). Conventional slow freezing methods function in part by the extracellular ice formation, which gradually increases the solute concentration and dehydrates cells. In contrast, vitrification uses high CPA concentrations (4–8

M) coupled with rapid cooling rates (
Luyet & Hodapp 1938;
Crowe et al. 1998;
Arav et al. 2002;
Demirci & Montesano 2007a;
Gook & Edgar 2007). Vitrification using different tools, including open-pulled straws, electron microscopy grids and cryoloops, all rely on the use of short-term exposure to high levels of CPAs with resulting rapid dehydration of cells prior to freezing (
Parkening et al. 1976;
Karlsson & Toner 1996;
Martino et al. 1996;
Lane et al. 1999;
Lane & Gardner 2001). The concern with the vitrification approach is the toxic effects and osmotic shock associated with high CPA levels (
Arav et al. 2002). The thawing procedure could cause similar problems, such as recrystallization and osmotic shock. Most protocols adopt rapid thawing to prevent intracellular ice formation (IIF) by limiting time for crystallization (
Crowe et al. 1998;
Demirci & Montesano 2007a).
Cell damage during cryopreservation is generally correlated to biophysical changes including cellular dehydration as well as intracellular and extracellular ice crystal formation (
Mazur 1984;
He & Bischof 2003). The dehydration events at low cooling rates (less than −1

°C

min
−1) owing to extracellular ice formation (solution effect) induce elevated intracellular and extracellular water concentration differences that cause both lipid (e.g. thermotropic phase transformations;
Caffrey 1987) and protein (e.g. cold denaturation;
Privalov 1990) changes at the molecular level. These changes could cause variation of lipid organization and fluidity inside the cells (
Crowe et al. 1989), and thus the damage to mammalian cell membranes (
Bischof 2006). With increased cooling rate (approx. −1

°C

min
−1), the transport of water across cell membranes decreases to much lower than even the intracellular cytoplasm supercooling condition. Supercooling, Δ
T=(
Tphs−
T) with
Tphs being the equilibrium phase change temperature, is the driving force of the IIF initiation, i.e. ice crystal nucleation. The decrease in water transport across cell membranes results in IIF, which has been found to highly correlate to cell death in various cell types (e.g. 50% IIF in many cell populations yields 50% survival;
Toner 1993). The cell damage is mainly caused by disruption of cell membranes and organelles owing to the volume expansion of intracellular ice crystals. When cells are dehydrated (i.e.
Tphs decreases), the driving force for nucleation decreases. At extremely high cooling rate (approx. −100

°C

min
−1), intracellular liquid remains within the cell and IIF can be avoided. The effects of slow freezing and vitrification on cellular structures are shown in .
Studies have been carried out using numerical modelling to explore the underlying mechanisms of the physical phenomena described above (
Rubinsky et al. 1980;
Thom et al. 1983;
Lin et al. 1990;
Zabaras et al. 1991;
Pegg 1996;
Rabin & Steif 1996,
1998;
Kandra & Devireddy 2008;
Trelea et al. 2009;
Zhmakin 2009). It has been demonstrated that mathematical models can be used to correlate thermophysical phenomena and biological outcomes to optimize experimental methods (
Bischof 2006;
Song et al. 2009). In this paper, we review methods used to model cryopreservation with a focus on mathematical formulation used during numerical analysis. First, we explain the heat transfer phenomena within the cells and tissues (macroscopic perspective) during cryopreservation processes. Crystallization of CPAs is illustrated and relevant moving boundary problems are covered. Second, we explain the mass transfer, cell dehydration and membrane transport from the microscopic perspective.