At present there are three known mechanisms by which autophagy can occur (). The first mechanism is called chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) and was originally described in lung fibroblasts () (
14). This mechanism involves the direct translocation of proteins across the lysosomal membrane via a complex that includes Hsc70 and the lysosome transmembrane protein Lamp2A (
15,
16). CMA is difficult to monitor
in vivo and at this point we do not have any information about whether this pathway is affected in pulmonary disease. However, CMA plays an important role in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration and aging (
17,
18), and is still an evolving field of biomedical research. The second autophagic pathway is called microautophagy and involves the direct invagination of cytosolic material into late endosomes or into multivesicular bodies, which subsequently either degrade the material on site or deliver the material to lysosomes for degradation (
19). Until more recently nothing was known about microautophagy at the molecular level, and the existence of this process was suspected in mammalian tissues only on the basis of electron micrographs (EMs). However, it was shown that microautophagy also employs Hsc70 but, unlike CMA, it targets proteins to late endosomal membranes through electrostatic interactions between this chaperone and the lipid phosphatidylserine, rather than by binding to Lamp2A () (
20). Microautophagy is similarly difficult to measure
in vivo and so little is understood about its physiological significance at this point, although this may change as the molecular mechanism is better defined.
The final pathway, macroautophagy (
21), receives the most attention in the literature and its contribution to human disease is the best explored of the three pathways. In fact, macroautophagy is so much better studied that it is often referred to in many papers as simply “autophagy,” even though it is only one of the pathways involved in lysosome-dependent degradation. This is in large part because macroautophagy can be visualized at both the light microscopic level (using fluorescent fusion proteins), and at the EM level making it relatively easy to detect (
22). In macroautophagy, a vesicular membrane is constructed around a volume of cytoplasm that is intended for degradation (). This novel structure, called an autophagosome, is distinct from other vesicles on electron micrographs because it contains a double-unit limiting membrane (
21). Autophagosomes then deliver their cargo for degradation by fusing with late endosomes and lysosomes, gradually losing their distinctive membrane structure (
23). The products of digestion, such as free amino acids, are recycled back to the cytoplasm via lysosomal permeases (
8). Of the three known autophagic pathways, macroautophagy is notable for its ability to process large intracellular structures such as organelles (
5,
6), invasive bacteria in the cytoplasm (
24,
25), and large protein aggregates (
10). Macroautophagy is sensitive to nutrient availability (
19,
26), and is altered in a variety of nonpulmonary diseases, such as neurodegeneration (
27), myopathy (
28,
29), and cancer (
30). All of the current literature about the role of autophagy in pulmonary disease focuses on macroautophagy, and therefore we focus on this mechanism for the remainder of this review.
The last decade has seen a dramatic increase in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying macroautophagy (). The current paradigm is that macroautophagy is mediated by a highly intricate mechanism that requires the contribution of at least 20–30 core proteins that are physically grouped into several distinct multiprotein complexes, each with a distinct functional specialization (
31). The most upstream complex described so far is composed of the proteins ATG1 (autophagy-related-1), FIP200 (FAK [focal adhesion kinase] family interacting protein of 200 kD), ATG101, and ATG13 and possesses serine/threonine kinase activity (
32,
33). This complex is regulated by mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) and AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase), which sense nutrient and intracellular ATP availability and, through phosphorylation of ATG1, adjust the rate of macroautophagy to the metabolic needs of the cell (
34). The primary function of the ATG1-containing complex is to control the activity and localization of another structure called the vps34 multiprotein complex, although the mechanism by which this is accomplished is unknown. The vps34 complex has phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) activity and the production of PI3 moieties is required for autophagosome formation (
35,
36). One important constituent of the vps34 complex is the protein ATG6/Beclin-1, which is an adaptor protein that is crucial for the participation of the vps34 complex in autophagosome formation (
37,
38). In yeast, the vps34 complex localizes to a distinct perinuclear structure called the phagophore assembly site (
39), whereas in mammalian cells this complex localizes to many sites distributed throughout the cell (
40). The precise location of these sites is controversial but there are microscopy data suggesting the vps34 complex can nucleate autophagosomes on the surface of both the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (
40) and mitochondria (
41), depending on the cell type and experimental conditions. The PI3-phosphate moieties laid down by vps34 recruit binding proteins that are critical for autophagosome maturation and may also intrinsically produce local changes in the membrane physical properties that make it easier to mold (
42–
44). The result is a cuplike structure that has been termed the “omegasome” (
40,
45,
46). The final group of proteins is an ubiquitin-like ligase system composed of the proteins ATG3, ATG7, and ATG10, and a trimeric complex composed of ATG5, ATG12, and ATG16L that localizes to the omegasome (
47,
48). The function of this system is to conjugate a protein called ATG8/LC3b to the lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), which is abundant in autophagosome membranes (
49). The PE-conjugated form of LC3b (called LC3b-II) is inserted into both sides of the autophagosome membrane (
50), and is required for autophagosome membrane elongation (
51,
52). LC3b is actually just one of at least five homologous proteins in mammalian cells (
53,
54), all of which are targeted to the autophagosome by PE conjugation and cooperate in autophagosome maturation and sealing (
52). Luminal-facing LC3b-II is degraded by lysosomal hydrolases (
55), while protein on the cytosolic-facing side of the autophagosome is recovered via delipidation () (
56). The cytoplasmic, nonlipidated form of LC3b, called LC3b-I, can then be recruited for the construction of new autophagosomes (
50,
56). LC3b also plays an important diagnostic role in macroautophagy research: because it is targeted uniquely to autophagosome membranes it serves as a convenient marker for this structure (
50).
Although the above-described molecular mechanism proposed for macroautophagy is now impressively detailed, much of this information comes from genetically deleting individual pathway members and then observing the results. As such we know a great deal about the hierarchal relationships between macroautophagy proteins, but we have little insight into how the functional groups cooperate on a biochemical level. It is not even certain that macroautophagy represents a single unified process, which is the current paradigm, or a collection of processes that happen to produce similar-looking vesicles under EM, but only partially overlap on the molecular level. Indeed, autophagosomes have been observed in mammalian cells even when critical proteins in the “canonical pathway” described above have been genetically knocked out (
57). That said, it is clear from genetic deletion of macroautophagy-related (ATG) proteins in mice that protein turnover via this process has physiological consequences that are relevant to human disease, including pulmonary disease.