PPARγ and its ligands have been previously studied in the context of corneal wound healing and have been shown to have anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring properties (
Pan, et al., 2009;
2010;
Saika, et al., 2007). Electrophilic PPARγ ligands, such as CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 have been shown to inhibit TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation in lung fibroblasts more potently than non-electrophilic PPARγ ligands (
Ferguson, et al., 2009). Here, we report for the first time, that the CDDO derivative, CDDO-Me, and 15d-PGJ
2 can also function as potent anti-fibrotic agents for cultured human corneal fibroblasts stimulated to differentiate into myofibroblasts by TGFβ. In fact, CDDO-Me was able to inhibit TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation to the same extent as 15d-PGJ
2, but at a 14-fold lower concentration.
In order to elucidate the mechanism through which CDDO-Me and 15d-PGJ
2 inhibit TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation, we first investigated the PPARγ-dependence of their anti-fibrotic properties. Using pharmacologic and genetic methods to block PPARγ, we demonstrated that the anti-fibrotic properties of CDDO-Me and 15d-PGJ
2 are largely PPARγ-independent.
Ferguson and colleagues (2009) demonstrated similar findings with CDDO (rather than CDDO-Me) and 15d-PGJ
2 in human lung fibroblasts and hypothesized that both PPARγ-dependent and PPARγ-independent pathways (
Bishop-Bailey and Wray, 2003;
Rizzo and Fiorucci, 2006) may generally modulate myofibroblast differentiation in that tissue. Both CDDOMe and CDDO bind to PPARγ with high affinity and activate PPRE (
Chintharlapalli, et al., 2005).
CDDO-Me has two electrophilic α/β-unsaturated ketones, while 15d-PGJ
2 has one. The electrophilic α/β-unsaturated ketone is susceptible to Michael addition reactions (
Shi and Greaney, 2005) with intracellular nucleophiles, such as glutathione and cysteine residues (
Brookes, et al., 2007). Non-electrophilic PPARγ ligands such as rosiglitazone and CAY10410 (the non-electrophilic structural analog of 15d-PGJ
2), were much less potent inhibitors of TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation than 15d-PGJ
2 and CDDO-Me. This suggests that the ability of CDDO-Me and 15d-PGJ
2 to inhibit TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation is related to the electrophilic nature of these two compounds. Furthermore, CDDO-Me was a more potent inhibitor of TGFβ-induced proteins at a much lower concentration than 15d-PGJ
2, which may be attributable to the presence of an additional α/β-unsaturated ketone. Other studies have also demonstrated that CDDO and its derivatives are effective inhibitors of TGFβ-induced proteins at much lower concentrations than 15d-PGJ
2 (
Ferguson, et al., 2009;
Kulkarni, et al., 2011). Reactivity with intracellular nucleophiles may be a potential mechanism through which these compounds are able to inhibit myofibroblast differentiation. Indeed, data show other electrophilic agents, such as PGA
2 and DSPS to also inhibit TGFβ-induced lung myofibroblast differentiation (
Ferguson, et al., 2009).
It should be noted here that we did not examine the ability of 15d-PGJ
2 and CDDO-Me to inhibit TGFβ-induced myofibroblast differentiation using keratocytes grown in serum-free media. Serum free conditions enable maintenance of the keratocyte phenotype
in vitro, while culturing keratocytes in serum results in their activation, entry into the cell cycle, and phenotypic changes (spindle shape, actin stress fiber assembly, etc.) that are consistent with those seen in activated, repair fibroblasts in a wounded cornea.(
Fini and Stramer, 2005;
Jester, et al., 1996) Our decision to culture cells in serum was based partly on the fact that CDDO-Me requires a significant amount of protein in the media in order to remain soluble and partly because we wanted to test the agents of interest in a setting that mimicked the wounded cornea
in vitro, rather than a non-inflammatory setting, generated by using serum free media.
Finally, a limitation of our study is related to the capability of bone-marrow derived cells to differentiate into αSMA expressing cells (
Barbosa, et al., 2010). Since we used corneal fibroblast cultures, we cannot draw conclusions on the capability of CDDO-Me or 15d-PGJ
2 to inhibit TGFβ-induced differentiation of bone-marrow derived cells to myofibroblasts. Our ongoing experiments examining the ability of electrophilic PPARγ ligands to inhibit corneal scarring
in vivo are designed to directly answer this question.
In summary, we have shown that CDDO-Me and 15d-PGJ2 are potent inhibitors of TGFβ-induced corneal myofibroblast differentiation by examining their ability to decrease levels of multiple myofibroblast proteins and mRNAs. We show that the ability of these PPARγ ligands to inhibit myofibroblast differentiation is largely independent of PPARγ, but dependent on electrophilicity. Further studies are needed to determine the exact mechanisms of action of CDDO-Me and 15d-PGJ2 in corneal fibroblasts. For example, these electrophilic PPARγ ligands may alter the function of intracellular mediators of TGFβ signaling. Due to its established favorable safety profile in human trials, CDDO-Me appears promising as a proximate therapeutic agent for corneal scarring. However, preclinical animal models of corneal scarring should be utilized to assess its efficacy, as well as that of 15d-PGJ2 and other electrophilic agents.