1. U.S. EPA. Cleaning Up the Nation’s Waste Sites: Markets and Technology Trends. 2004. EPA/542/R-04/015.
2. Harkins SM, Truesdale RS, Hill R, Hoffman P, Winters S. US production of manufactured gases: Assessment of past disposal practices. Prepared by Research Triangle Institute for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory; Cincinnati, OH. 1988.
3. Luthy RG, Dzombak DA, Peters CA, Roy SB, Ramaswami A, Nakles DV, Nott BR. Remediating tar-contaminated soils at manufactured gas plant sites. Environmental Science & Technology. 1994;28:266A–276A. [PubMed]
4. NIOSH. Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to coal tar products. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service; Center for Disease Control; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Cincinnati: 1977.
5. Zhang MJ, Chen BJ, Shen SD, Chen SY. Compositional studies of high-temperature coal tar by GC–FT–IR analysis of middle oil fractions. Fuel. 1997;76:415–423.
6. Zhang MJ, Li SD, Chen BJ. Compositional studies of high-temperature coal-tar by GC/FTIR analysis of light oil fractions. Chromatographia. 1992;33:138–146.
7. Wise S, Sander L, Chang H, Markides K, Lee M. Shape selectivity in liquid and gas chromatography: Polymeric octadecylsilane (C18) and liquid crystalline stationary phases. Chromatographia. 1988;25:473–479.
8. Blanco CG, Blanco J, Bernad P, Guillen MD. Capillary gas chromatographic and combined gas chromatography–mass spectrometric study of the volatile fraction of a coal tar pitch using OV-1701 stationary phase. Journal of Chromatography A. 1991;539:157–167.
9. Birak PS, Miller CT. Dense non-aqueous phase liquids at former manufactured gas plants: Challenges to modeling and remediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2009;105:81–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 10. Zheng JZ, Powers SE. Identifying the effect of polar constituents in coal-derived NAPLs on interfacial tension. Environmental Science & Technology. 2003;37:3090–3094. [PubMed]
11. Barranco FT, Dawson HE. Influence of aqueous pH on the interfacial properties of coal tar. Environmental Science & Technology. 1999;33:1598–1603.
12. Powers SE, Anckner WH, Seacord TF. Wettability of NAPL-contaminated sands. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE. 1996;122:889–896.
13. Zheng JZ, Powers SE. Organic bases in NAPLs and their impact on wettability. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 1999;39:161–181.
14. Zheng JZ, Shao JH, Powers SE. Asphaltenes from coal tar and creosote: Their role in reversing the wettability of aquifer systems. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2001;244:365–371.
15. Zheng JZ, Behrens SH, Borkovec M, Powers SE. Predicting the wettability of quartz surfaces exposed to dense nonaqueous phase liquids. Environmental Science & Technology. 2001;35:2207–2213. [PubMed]
16. Hugaboom DA, Powers SE. Recovery of coal tar and creosote from porous media: The influence of wettability. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation. 2002;22:83–90.
17. Villaume JF. Investigations at sites contaminated with dense non-aqueous phase liquids. Ground Water Monitoring Review. 1985;5:60–74.
18. Wu J, Gong Z, Zheng L, Yi Y, Jin J, Li X, Li P. Removal of high concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil by biodiesel. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China. 2010;4:387–394.
19. Troxler WL, Brankley TW. Factors affecting soil clean-up levels achievable by thermal desorption technologies at MGP sites. Land Contamination & Reclamation. 2006;14:209–217.
20. Mival K, Pump W, Dixon G. From wasteland to green parkland, the remediation of the former West Melbourne Gasworks, Victoria, Australia. Land Contamination & Reclamation. 2006;14:194–199.
21. Lingle JW, Brehm KL. Application of source removal and natural attenuation remediation strategies at MGP sites in Wisconsin. Remediation Journal. 2003;13:29–39.
22. Heasman I, Westcott FJ. Remediation of a gasworks site for residential development: The Wharf Lane Site, Solihull, UK. Land Contamination & Reclamation. 2006;14:189–193.
23. Grosscurth M, Osten M, Kilger R. Clean-up of the Grasbrook Gasworks in the HafenCity of Hamburg. Land Contamination & Reclamation. 2006;14:185–188.
24. U.S. EPA. Waste Research Strategy. 1999.
25. Switzer C, Pironi P, Gerhard JI, Rein G, Torero JL. Self-sustaining smoldering combustion: A novel remediation process for non-aqueous-phase liquids in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology. 2009;43:5871–5877. [PubMed]
26. Baker RS, Brogan D, Lotti M. Demonstration of tailored levels of in-situ heating for remediation of a former MGP site. Land Contamination and Reclamation. 2006;14:335–339.
27. Johnson J, LA, Fahy LJ. In situ treatment of manufactured gas plant contaminated soils demonstration program. 1997.
28. Pennell KD, Pope GA, Abriola LM. Influence of viscous and buoyancy forces on the mobilization of residual tetrachloroethylene during surfactant flushing. Environmental Science & Technology. 1996;30:1328–1335.
29. Pope GA, Wade WH. In: In Surfactant-Enhanced Subsurface Remediation: Emerging Technologies. Sabatini DA, Knox RC, Harwell J, editors. American Chemical Society; Washington, D.C: 1995. pp. 142–160.
30. Sheng JJ. Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery. Gulf Professional Publishing (Elsevier); Burlington, MA: 2011.
31. Giese SW, Powers SE. Using polymer solutions to enhance recovery of mobile coal tar and creosote DNAPLs. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2002;58:147–167. [PubMed]
32. Tzimas G, Matsuura T, Avraam D, Van der Brugghen W, Constantinides GN, Payatakes A. The combined effect of the viscosity ratio and the wettability during forced imbibition through nonplanar porous media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1997;189:27–36.
33. Longino BL, Kueper BH. Effects of capillary pressure and use of polymer solutions on dense, non-aqueous-phase liquid retention and mobilization in a rough-walled fracture. Environmental Science and Technology. 1999;33:2447–2455.
34. Chiwetelu CI, Hornof V, Neale GH, George A. Use of mixed surfactants to improve the transient interfacial tension behaviour of heavy oil/alkaline systems. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 1994;72:534–540.
35. Chiwetelu CI, Hornof V, Neale GH. Mechanisms for the interfacial reaction between acidic oils and alkaline reagents. Chemical Engineering Science. 1990;45:627–638.
36. Islam MR, Chakma A. Mathematical modelling of enchanced oil recovery by alkali solutions in the presence of cosurfactant and polymer. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 1991;5:105–126.
37. Zhang L, Luo L, Zhao S, Xu ZC, An JY, Yu JY. Effect of different acidic fractions in crude oil on dynamic interfacial tensions in surfactant/alkali/model oil systems. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2004;41:189–198.
38. Taylor KC, Hawkins BF. In: In Emulsions: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. Schramm LL, editor. American Chemical Society; Washington, D.C: 1992. pp. 263–294.
39. Elkamel A, Al-Sahhaf T, Suttar Ahmed A. Studying the interaction between an Arabian heavy crude oil and alkaline solutions. Petroleum Science and Technology. 2002;20:789–807.
40. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CFR Title 21, Part 184 Direct Food Substances Generally Recognized as Safe. 2002.
41. Roote DS. Prepared by Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center. 1998. Technology Status Report: In Situ Flushing. TS-98-01.
42. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: A review. Engineering Geology. 2001;60:371–380.
43. Pitts M, Wyatt K, Sale T, Piontek KR. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry; Society of Petroleum Engineers; New Orleans, LA, USA. 1993. pp. 33–44.
44. Ball WP, Liu C, Xia G, Young DF. A diffusion-based interpretation of tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene concentration profiles in a groundwater aquitard. Water Resources Research. 1997;33:2741–2757.
45. Birak PS, Newman AP, Richardson SD, Hauswirth SC, Pedit JA, Aitken MD, Miller CT. Cosolvent flushing for the remediation of PAHs from former manufactured gas plants. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2011 In Press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Hirasaki GJ, Pope GA. Analysis of factors influencing mobility and adsorption in the flow of polymer solution through porous media. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. 1974;14:337–346.
47. Freitas AA, Quina FH, Carroll FA. Estimation of water-organic interfacial tensions. A linear free energy relationship analysis of interfacial adhesion. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997;101:7488–7493.
48. Bahramian A, Danesh A. Prediction of liquid–liquid interfacial tension in multi-component systems. Journal of Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2004;221:197–205.
49. Sah H, Choi S-K, Choi H-G, Yong C-S. Relation of dynamic changes in interfacial tension to protein destabilization upon emulsification. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2002;25:381–386. doi: 10.1007/BF02976643. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] 50. Sah H. Protein behavior at the water/methylene chloride interface. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1999;88:1320–1325. [PubMed]
51. Hool K, Schuchardt B. A new instrument for the measurement of liquid-liquid interfacial tension and the dynamics of interfacial tension reduction. Measurement Science and Technology. 1992;3:451.
52. Drummond C, Israelachvili J. Surface forces and wettability. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2002;33:123–133.
53. Lide DR. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 91. CRC Press; Cleveland, OH: 2011.
54. Eberhardt C, Grathwohl P. Time scales of organic contaminant dissolution from complex source zones: Coal tar pools vs. blobs. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 2002;59:45–66. [PubMed]
55. Chiwetelu CI, Hornof V, Neale GH. A dynamic-model for the interaction of caustic reagents with acidic oils. AICHE Journal. 1990;36:233–241.
56. Nasr-El-Din HA, Hawkins BF, Green KA. Recovery of residual oil using the alkali/surfactant/polymer process: Effect of alkali concentration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 1992;6:381–401.
57. Touhami Y, Hornof V, Neale GH. Dynamic interfacial tension behavior of acidified oil/surfactant-enhanced alkaline systems 1. Experimental studies. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects. 1998;132:61–74.
58. Wasan DT. Surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding for light oil recovery: Annual report 1992–1993. 1994.
59. Chatterjee J, Wasan DT. A kinetic model for dynamic interfacial tension variation in an acidic oil/alkali/surfactant system. Chemical Engineering Science. 1998;53:2711–2725.
60. Dwarakanath V, Jackson RE, Pope GA. Influence of wettability on the recovery of NAPLs from alluvium. Environmental Science and Technology. 2002;36:227–231. [PubMed]
61. Dong M, Ma S, Liu Q. Enhanced heavy oil recovery through interfacial instability: A study of chemical flooding for Brintnell heavy oil. Fuel. 2009;88:1049–1056.
62. Wright DJ, Birak PS, Pedit JA, Miller CT. Effectiveness of source-zone remediation of DNAPL–contaminated subsurface systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering–ASCE. 2010;136:452–465.