PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Invest Dermatol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 1, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3258303
NIHMSID: NIHMS324793
Six decades of vitiligo genetics: Genomewide studies provide insights into autoimmune pathogenesis
Richard A. Spritz1
1Human Medical Genetics Program and Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
Correspondence to: Richard A. Spritz, Human Medical Genetics Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, PO Box 6511, MS8300, 12800 E 19th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045 USA., richard.spritz/at/ucdenver.edu
Generalized vitiligo (GV) is a complex disease in which patchy depigmentation results from autoimmune loss of melanocytes from affected regions. Genetic analyses of GV span six decades, with the goal of understanding biological mechanisms and elucidating pathways that underlie the disease. The earliest studies attempted to describe the mode of inheritance and genetic epidemiology. Early genetic association studies of biological candidate genes resulted in some successes, principally HLA and PTPN22, but in hindsight many such reports now seem to be false-positives. Later genomewide linkage studies of multiplex GV families identified NLRP1 and XBP1, which appear to be valid GV susceptibility genes that control key aspects of immune regulation. Recently, the application of genomewide association studies to analysis of GV has produced a rich yield of validated GV susceptibility genes that encode components of biological pathways reaching from immune cells to the melanocyte. These genes and pathways provide insights into underlying pathogenetic mechanisms and potential triggers of GV, establish relationships to other autoimmune diseases, and may provide clues to potential new approaches to GV treatment and perhaps even prevention. These results thus validate the hopes and efforts of the early investigators who first attempted to comprehend the genetic basis of vitiligo.
Keywords: vitiligo, autoimmune disease, gene, association, linkage
Generalized vitiligo (GV) is a complex disorder in which acquired, progressive, multifocal loss of pigmentation of skin and hair results from loss of melanocytes from the affected areas (Taïeb and Picardo, 2009; Birlea et al., 2011b). While the striking phenotype of GV has been recognized for thousands of years (Nordlund et al., 2006), its underlying pathobiology has remained largely unknown, despite the suggestion of numerous theories (Boissy and Spritz, 2009; Picardo and Taïeb, 2010). Some of the earliest attempts to understand the biology of GV considered its possible genetic basis, in the hope that understanding the genetics would lead to insights into basic pathogenetic mechanisms of disease (Stüttgen, 1950; Teindel, 1950; Lerner, 1959). Over the next four decades, various types of genetic studies aimed to discover genes involved in mediating GV susceptibility, with limited success. However, recently genomewide genetic association studies have succeeded in identifying a veritable cornucopia of GV susceptibility genes, encoding components of biological networks that largely regulate elements of the immune system and their targeting and destruction of melanocytes.
Probably the earliest evidence relating to the genetic basis of vitiligo was the 1855 description by Addison, of a patient with idiopathic adrenal insufficiency (now known as Addison’s disease), GV, and pernicious anemia (Addison, 1855). Over the next century numerous case reports described co-occurrence of GV and various other autoimmune diseases, and in 1908 Claude suggested the likelihood of a causal connection among autoimmune diseases that tended to occur concomitantly (Claude, 1908).
In 1926 Schmidt codified the concomitant occurrence of Addison’s disease and autoimmune thyroid disease, in what came to be called “Schmidt syndrome” (Schmidt, 1926), and in1980 Neufeld and Blizzard re-classified the so-called “autoimmune polyglandular syndromes” (APS), denoting a rare autosomal recessive form (sometimes including GV) as APS-1, denoting Schmidt syndrome (sometimes including GV) as APS-2, denoting concomitant occurrence of autoimmune thyroid disease with at least one other autoimmune disease (again, often including GV) as APS-3, and denoting all other combinations of autoimmune diseases as APS-4 (Neufeld and Blizzard, 1980). While there have been a number of subsequent attempts to refine the APS classification, except for APS-1 (now renamed APECED; autoimmune polyendocrinopathy, candidiasis, ectodermal dystrophy, resulting from mutations in the AIRE gene), this system is no longer widely used. Instead, it has become clear that “multiple autoimmune disease” is more complex, and that GV is part of a more general autoimmune disease diathesis. Indeed, the frequencies of many other autoimmune diseases, particularly including autoimmune thyroid disease (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and Graves’ disease), adult-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, pernicious anemia, Addison’s disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), are elevated among GV patients (Alkhateeb et al., 2003; LaBerge et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2006). Furthermore, the frequencies of these same autoimmune diseases are elevated among the first-degree relatives of GV patients, even those who do not have GV (Alkhateeb et al., 2003; LaBerge et al., 2005). This has led to the belief that general susceptibility to autoimmunity is a complex trait involving various shared susceptibility genes, while other genes and exposure to unknown environmental triggers determine the occurrence of GV and other specific autoimmune diseases in individual patients (Spritz, 2008).
In addition, genetic epidemiological studies have addressed the likely mode of inheritance of GV. While there had been a number of previous case reports describing the occurrence of GV in occasional relatives, perhaps the first to address the inheritance of GV specifically were Stüttgen (1950) and Teindel (1950), who described multigenerational families with multiple cases of GV (“multiplex families”) and other autoimmune diseases, concluding that autosomal dominant inheritance seemed likely. Based on a survey of 128 vitiligo patients, Lerner (1959) noted that 38% reported affected relatives, and concluded the “disease is often transmitted as a dominant trait.” However, while many subsequent patient surveys around the world confirmed frequent clustering of vitiligo cases within families (e.g. Mehta et al., 1973; Howitz et al., 1977; Obe, 1984; Das et al., 1985; Bhatia et al., 1992; Majumder et al., 1993; Kim et al., 1998; Alkhateeb et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2006), a single-locus Mendelian pattern of inheritance was not supported, and most favored a polygenic, multifactorial model involving multiple genes and also environmental risk factors, what is now termed a “complex trait”. An major environmental component in GV is also indicated by its limited concordance in monozygotic twins; among 22 such twin-pairs, Alkhateeb et al. (2003) reported a concordance of only 23%, underscoring the importance of environmental triggers in disease pathogenesis.
The earliest analyses testing the involvement of specific genes in the pathogenesis of GV were candidate gene association studies, of HLA (Retornaz et al., 1976), ABO (Kareemullah et al., 1977), and other blood groups (Wasfi et al., 1980), and were generally negative. A large number of ‘positive’ candidate gene associations with GV have been reported subsequently (reviewed in Birlea et al., 2011a). However, candidate gene association studies of complex diseases have generally proven to be highly subject to false-positive artifacts, principally due to occult ethnic differences between cases and controls (population stratification) and inadequate correction for multiple-testing (Hirschhorn et al., 2002; Freedman et al., 2004), and thus have fallen into general disfavor. Except for HLA and PTPN22, most candidate gene associations reported for GV have not been confirmed by subsequent studies (reviewed in Birlea et al., 2011a).
Genomewide linkage and association studies are not biased by a priori biological hypotheses and are less subject to methodological pitfalls than are candidate gene approaches. Genetic linkage studies are best suited to detecting relatively rare disease susceptibility alleles with large effects, as in multiplex families. While genetic linkage studies are typically carried out genomewide, in fact the first linkage analysis reported for GV was a negative study, testing linkage of a candidate gene, MITF (Tripathi et al., 1999). The first direct genomewide linkage study of GV, in a unique large Caucasian kindred with apparent autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance, detected linkage in chromosome 1p31.3–p32.2 (“AIS1”; Alkhateeb et al., 2001). Subsequent DNA sequence analysis of genes in the chromosome 1p linkage interval identified a transcriptional regulatory variant of FOXD3, which encodes Forkhead box D3), a key regulator of melanoblast lineage differentiation and development (Alkhateeb et al., 2005).
Genomewide linkage studies of many other Caucasian multiplex GV families identified additional linkage signals on chromosomes 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 17, 19, and 22 (Fain et al., 2003; Spritz et al., 2004). The strongest of these signals, on chromosome 17p13, coincided with SLEV1, a linkage signal for SLE detected in families that also included at least one relative with GV (Nath et al., 2001) or other autoimmune diseases (Johansson et al., 2004). Targeted family-based genetic association analysis of SNPs spanning the chromosome 17p linkage interval identified the corresponding gene as NALP1 (now renamed NLRP1), encoding NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 1 (Jin et al., 2007a), a key regulator of the innate immune system that apparently acts as a sentinel for bacterial infection in the skin (Lamkanfi and Dixit, 2009). Several studies have subsequently confirmed association of NLRP1 with GV, (Jin et al., 2007b; Alkhateeb and Qarqaz, 2010), and also with type 1 diabetes (Magitta et al., 2008), Addison’s disease (Magitta et al., 2008; Zurawek et al., 2010), celiac disease (Pontillo et al., 2011), systemic sclerosis (Dieudé et al., 2010), and perhaps inflammatory bowel disease (De Iudicibus et al., 2011).
Parallel genetic linkage studies of GV in Han Chinese detected linkage signals on chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 14, and 22 (Chen et al., 2005; Liang et al., 2007). These linkage signals generally did not correspond to those detected in Caucasian families, suggesting that different genes might underlie GV susceptibility in these different populations. By candidate gene association analysis of several genes located within the chromosome 22q12.1–12.3 linkage peak, Ren et al. (2009) subsequently identified XBP1, encoding transcription factor X-box binding protein 1, which activates MHC class II gene expression, regulates plasma cell differentiation, and mediates inflammatory response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Additional support for involvement of XBP1 in the pathogenesis of GV came from a subsequent genomewide association study of Caucasians (Birlea et al., 2011a), and XBP1 has been independently associated with genetic risk of Crohn’s disease (Kaser et al., 2008).
Genomewide association studies (GWAS) are best suited to detecting relatively common disease susceptibility alleles with modest effects, as may be most relevant to typical singleton cases of a complex disease such as GV. Of particular importance, GWAS can adequately correct for both population stratification and multiple-testing (Hirschhorn et al., 2002; Freedman et al., 2004), and so are currently considered the “gold standard” for identifying complex trait susceptibility genes.
The first GV GWAS (Birlea et al., 2010) involved a “special population”, an isolated village with a very high prevalence of GV located in the mountains of northwestern Romania (Birlea et al., 2008). This analysis detected GV association with SNPs in distal chromosome 6q27, in the vicinity of IDDM8, a linkage and association signal for type I diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis.
A subsequent, much larger GWAS in Caucasians detected at least 13 different GV susceptibility loci (Jin et al., 2010a,b; Table 1), and confirmed three others that had been reported in previous candidate gene studies (Birlea et al., 2011a). A parallel GV GWAS in Chinese (Quan et al., 2010) detected two association signals, one or both of which were among those detected in Caucasians (Table 1). In both the Caucasian and Chinese studies, strong GV association signals were detected in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6p21.3. In Caucasians, independent associations were detected in both the MHC class I and class II gene regions. In the class I region, the major association signal was in the vicinity of HLA-A, in strong linkage disequilibrium with HLA-A*02. In the class II region, the major association signal was located between HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQA1, in moderate linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DRB1*04 (Jin et al., 2010a). These results are thus consistent with previous reports of association of GV with both HLA-A*02 (Liu et al., 2007) and HLA-DRB1*04 (Fain et al., 2006) alleles. However, in Chinese, the major MHC association signal was in the class III gene region, with some evidence for additional association in the class II gene region (Quan et al., 2010).
Table 1
Table 1
Loci with confirmed involvement in GV susceptibility on the basis of genomewide studies1
Perhaps more important, these two large-scale GV GWASs also detected association with a number of non-MHC loci, almost all of which encode immunoregulatory proteins. The Caucasian GWAS (Jin et al., 2010a,b) detected associations with at least ten non-MHC loci: TYR (tyrosinase), PTPN22 (lymphoid-specific protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 22), RERE (arginine-glutamic acid dipeptide [RE] repeats protein; atrophin-like protein 1), FOXP1 (forkhead box P1), LPP (LIM domain-containing preferred translocation partner in lipoma), IL2RA (interleukin-2-receptor alpha chain), GZMB (granzyme B), UBASH3A (ubiquitin-associated and SH3 domain-containing A), C1QTNF6 (C1q and tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6), and CCR6 (C-C chemokine receptor type 6). This last gene is located very close to the 6q27 association signal detected in the Romanian village (Birlea et al., 2010), and was the only non-MHC locus detected in the Chinese GWAS (Quan et al., 2010). The Caucasian GWAS also provided evidence of association of GV with additional loci previously suggested as candidate genes for GV: XBP1 (see above), FOXP3 (forkhead box P3), TSLP (thymic stromal lymphoprotein), and CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4), though as in previous studies association of GV with CTLA4 appeared to reflect primary association with other concomitant autoimmune diseases in the GV cases, rather than with GV itself (Birlea et al., 2011a).
Among the most illuminating associations with GV are those of MHC class I and TYR, which together highlight one of the pathways by which the immune system “sees” and thus targets melanocytes. The MHC class I association in Caucasians with GV is with SNP rs12206499, which tags HLA-A*02 (predominantly HLA-A*02:01), while the TYR association with GV is with the major (R; Arg) allele of the R402Q polymorphism (SNP rs1126809) that is relatively common among Caucasians (minor allele frequency 0.22 to 0.40) but is rare in other populations (Tripathi et al., 1991). In contrast, the minor (Q; Gln) allele of the TYR R402Q polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to malignant melanoma (Gudbjartsson et al., 2008; Bishop et al., 2009), while HLA-A*02 is associated with relatively favorable response to melanoma immunotherapy (Mitchell et al., 1992). Tyrosinase is a major GV autoantigen presented to the immune system on the surface of melanocytes and melanoma cells by HLA class I molecules, principally HLA-A*02. One of the important epitopes presented by HLA-A*02 is a modified tyrosinase nonapeptide, YMDGTMSQV (Skipper et al., 1996). However, the variant 402Q form of tyrosinase is hypoglycosylated (Toyofuku et al., 2001), which in turn would prevent the modification that is essential for its antigenic presentation by HLA-A*02. As the result, tyrosinase-402R likely makes a quantitatively greater contribution than tyrosinase-402Q to presentation of antigenic tyrosinase by HLA-A*02. Together, these findings indicate an apparent inverse relationship between genetic susceptibility to GV and genetic susceptibility to malignant melanoma as mediated by TYR and HLA-A*02 (Jin et al., 2010a), suggesting that GV may represent a dysregulated mechanism of immune surveillance against malignant melanoma, with TYR R402Q modulating immune recognition of melanocytes by modulating availability of tyrosinase peptide for presentation by HLA-A*02 (Spritz, 2010).
In addition to primary searches for genes that influence disease susceptibility per se, genomewide approaches can also be used to identify genes that influence the natural history of disease. Such an approach has recently been taken to identify a locus that contributes to GV age of onset (Jin et al., 2011). These authors’ reanalyzed their previous GV GWAS dataset, considering only the affected individuals, in whom GV age of onset was assessed as a quantitative trait. This analysis identified a major GV age of onset locus in the MHC class II region, apparently reflecting the same locus that was associated with GV susceptibility (Jin et al., 2010a), while none of the other loci that had been associated with GV susceptibility per se were associated with age of onset. These results suggest that some loci likely mediate GV susceptibility per se, whereas other loci, particularly variation in the MHC class II region, might mediate response to environmental triggers encountered over the course of life, thereby influencing age of disease onset.
For GV as for many other complex diseases, application of genomewide approaches, particularly GWAS, has resulted in rapid progress in identifying true disease susceptibility genes, while most genes suggested as a priori biologically-based candidates have remained unconfirmed. Accordingly, for GV as for many other diseases, we have entered a new era of understanding the true underlying pathobiology, which in the case of GV appears to be predominantly autoimmune. Furthermore, many of the genes that are genetically associated with GV are also genetically associated with some of the other autoimmune diseases with which GV is epidemiologically associated, confirming the longstanding hypothesis that these epidemiological associations reflect underlying shared causal elements (Claude, 1908).
The studies carried out so far have identified a plethora of new biological pathways that constitute potential targets for therapeutic intervention and perhaps even disease prevention. However, these findings only scratch the surface, accounting for a relatively small portion of total disease risk. Larger genomewide studies can be expected to identify even more GV susceptibility genes and thus shed even more light on the nature of the disease, and perhaps even provide clues to environmental triggers. Moreover, for only a few of the GV susceptibility genes found thus far have the corresponding underlying causal variants been identified; this will require extensive DNA sequencing of large numbers of GV patients, careful bioinformatics analysis, and targeted functional studies to assess the effects of specific variants, both individually and in combination. Nevertheless, the way forward is now clear, with many doors opening to new understanding and new opportunities for treating patients with GV.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants R01 AR45585 and R01 AR056292 from the National Institutes of Health. Thanks to P.R. Fain, S.A. Birlea, and Y. Jin for comments on the manuscript.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author states no conflict of interest.
  • Addison T. A collection of the published writing of the late Thomas Addison, MD, physician to Guy’s Hospital. New Sydenham Society; London: 1855. On the constitutional and local effects of disease of the suprarenal capsules; p. 1868. Reprinted in Med Classics 1937; 2:244–93.
  • Alkhateeb A, Stetler GL, Old W, et al. Mapping of an autoimmunity susceptibility locus (AIS1) to chromosome 1p31.3–p32.2. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:661–7. [PubMed]
  • Alkhateeb A, Fain PR, Thody A, et al. Epidemiology of vitiligo and associated autoimmune diseases in Caucasian probands and their families. Pigment Cell Res. 2003;16:208–14. [PubMed]
  • Alkhateeb A, Fain P, Spritz RA. Candidate functional promoter variant in the FOXD3 melanoblast developmental regulator gene in autosomal dominant vitiligo. J Investig Dermatol. 2005;125:388–91. [PubMed]
  • Alkhateeb A, Qarqaz F. Genetic association of NALP1 with generalized vitiligo in Jordanian Arabs. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010;302:631–4. [PubMed]
  • Bhatia PS, Mohan L, Pandey ON, et al. Genetic nature of vitiligo. J Dermatol Sci. 1992;4:180–4. [PubMed]
  • Birlea SA, Fain PR, Spritz RA. A Romanian population isolate with high frequency of vitiligo and associated autoimmune diseases. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:310–6. [PubMed]
  • Birlea SA, Gowan K, Fain PR, et al. Genome-wide association study of generalized vitiligo in an isolated European founder population identifies SMOC2, in close proximity to IDDM8. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:798–803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Birlea SA, Jin Y, Bennett DC, et al. Comprehensive association analysis of candidate genes for generalized vitiligo supports XBP1, FOXP3, and TSLP. J Invest Dermatol. 2011a;131:371–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Birlea SA, Spritz RA, Norris DA. Vitiligo. In: Wolff K, editor. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 8. McGraw-Hill; New York: 2011b. in press.
  • Bishop TD, Demenais F, Iles MM, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with melanoma risk. Nat Genet. 2009;41:920–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boissy RE, Spritz RA. Frontiers and controversies in the pathobiology of vitiligo: separating the wheat from the chaff. Exp Dermatol. 2009;18:583–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chen JJ, Huang W, Gui JP, et al. A novel linkage to generalized vitiligo on 4q13–q21 identified in a genomewide linkage analysis of Chinese families. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:1057–65. [PubMed]
  • Claude H, Gourgerot H. Insuffisiance pluriglandulaire endocrinienne. J Physiol Pathol Gen. 1908;10:469–80.
  • Das SK, Majumder PP, Chakraborty R, et al. Studies on vitiligo. I. Epidemiological profile in Calcutta, India. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2:71–8. [PubMed]
  • De Iudicibus S, Stocco G, Martelossi S, et al. Genetic predictors of glucocorticoid response in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:e1–7. [PubMed]
  • Dieudé P, Guedj M, Wipff J, et al. NLRP1 influences the systemic sclerosis phenotype: a new clue for the contribution of innate immunity in systemic sclerosis-related fibrosing alveolitis pathogenesis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;70:668–74. [PubMed]
  • Fain PR, Gowan K, LaBerge GS, et al. A genomewide screen for autoimmune vitiligo: Confirmation of AIS1 on chromosome 1p31 and evidence for additional susceptibility loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1560–4. [PubMed]
  • Fain PR, Babu SR, Bennett DC, et al. HLA class II haplotype DRB1*04-DQB1*0301 contributes to risk of familial generalized vitiligo and early disease onset. Pigment Cell Res. 2006;19:51–7. [PubMed]
  • Freedman ML, Reich D, Penney KL, et al. Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies. Nat Genet. 2004;36:388–93. [PubMed]
  • Gudbjartsson DF, Sulem P, Stacey SN, et al. ASIP and TYR pigmentation variants associate with cutaneous melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2008;40:886–91. [PubMed]
  • Hirschhorn JN, Lohmueller K, Byrne E, et al. A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet Med. 2002;4:45–60. [PubMed]
  • Howitz J, Brodthagen H, Schwartz M, et al. Prevalence of vitiligo: epidemiological survey of the isle of Bornholm, Denmark. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:47–52. [PubMed]
  • Jin Y, Birlea SA, Fain PR, et al. Genetic variations in NALP1 are associated with generalized vitiligo in a Romanian population. J Investig Dermatol. 2007b;127:2558–62. [PubMed]
  • Jin Y, Mailloux CM, Gowan K, et al. NALP1 and vitiligo-associated multiple autoimmune disease. New Engl J Med. 2007a;365:10–8.
  • Jin Y, Birlea SA, Fain PR, et al. Variant of TYR and autoimmunity susceptibility loci in generalized vitiligo. N Engl J Med. 2010a;362:1686–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jin Y, Birlea SA, Fain PR, et al. Common variants in FOXP1 are associated with generalized vitiligo. Nat Genet. 2010b;42:576–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jin Y, Birlea SA, Fain PR, et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies a quantitative trait locus in the MHC class II region associated with generalized vitiligo age of onset. J Investig Dermatol. 2011 February 17; [Epub ahead of print] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Johansson CM, Zunec R, Garcia MA, et al. Chromosome 17p12–q11 harbors susceptibility loci for systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum Genet. 2004;115:230–8. [PubMed]
  • Kareemullah L, Taneja V, Begum S, et al. Association of ABO blood groups and vitiligo. J Med Genet. 1977;14:211–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaser A, Lee AH, Franke A, et al. XBP1 links ER stress to intestinal inflammation and confers genetic risk for human inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2008;134:743–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kim SM, Chung HS, Hann S-K. The genetics of vitiligo in Korean patients. Internat J Dermatol. 1998;38:908–10. [PubMed]
  • Laberge G, Mailloux CM, Gowan K, et al. Early disease onset and increased risk of other autoimmune diseases in familial generalized vitiligo. Pigment Cell Res. 2005;18:300–5. [PubMed]
  • Lamkanfi M, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: guardians of cytosolic sanctity. Immunol Rev. 2009;227:95–105. [PubMed]
  • Liang Y, Yang S, Zhou Y, et al. Evidence for two susceptibility loci on chromosomes 22q12 and 6p21–p22 in Chinese generalized vitiligo families. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2552–7. [PubMed]
  • Liu JB, Li M, Chen H, et al. Association of vitiligo with HLA-A2: a meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:205–13. [PubMed]
  • Magitta NF, Bøe Wolff AS, Johansson S, et al. A coding polymorphism in NALP1 confers risk for autoimmune Addison’s disease and type 1 diabetes. Genes Immun. 2009;10:120–4. [PubMed]
  • Majumder PP, Nordland JJ, Nath SP. Pattern of familial aggregation of vitiligo. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:994–8. [PubMed]
  • Mehta NR, Shah KC, Theodore C, et al. Epidemiological study of vitiligo in Surat area, south Gujarat. Indian J Med Res. 1973;61:145–54. [PubMed]
  • Mitchell MS, Harel W, Groshen S. Association of HLA phenotype with response to active specific immunotherapy of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1158–64. [PubMed]
  • Nath SK, Kelly JA, Namjou B, et al. Evidence for a susceptibility gene, SLEV1, on chromosome 17p13 in families with vitiligo-related systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:1401–6. [PubMed]
  • Neufeld M, Blizzard RM. Polyglandular autoimmune diseases. In: Pinchera A, Doniach D, Fenzi GF, et al., editors. Symposium on Autoimmune Aspects of Endocrine Disorders. Academic Press; New York: 1980. pp. 357–65.
  • Nordlund JJ, Ortonne J-P, Le Poole IC. Vitiligo vulgaris. In: Nordlund JJ, Boissy RE, Hearing VJ, et al., editors. The Pigmentary System. 2. Blackwell; Oxford: 2006. pp. 551–98.
  • Obe WK. Vitiligo in Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med. 1984;30:259–64. [PubMed]
  • Picardo M, Taieb A, editors. Vitiligo. Springer; Heidelberg: 2010.
  • Pontillo A, Vendramin A, Catamo E, et al. The missense variation Q705K in CIAS1/NALP3/NLRP3 gene and an NLRP1 haplotype are associated with celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:539–44. [PubMed]
  • Quan C, Ren YQ, Xiang LH, et al. Genome-wide association study for vitiligo identifies susceptibility loci at 6q27 and the MHC. Nat Genet. 2010;42:614–8. [PubMed]
  • Ren Y, Yang S, Xu S, et al. Genetic variation of promoter sequence modulates XBP1 expression and genetic risk for vitiligo. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(6):e1000523. [Epub 2009 Jun 19] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Retornaz G, Betuel H, Ortonne JP, et al. HL-A antigens and vitiligo. Br J Dermatol. 1976;95:173–5. [PubMed]
  • Schmidt M. Eine biglanduiare Erkrankung (Nebennieren und Schilddruse) bei Morbus Addisonii. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol. 1926;21:212–21.
  • Skipper JCA, Hendrickson RC, Gulden PH, et al. An HLA-A2-restricted tyrosinase antigen on melanoma cells results from posttranslational modification and suggests a novel pathway for processing of membrane proteins. J Exp Med. 1996;183:527–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Spritz RA, Gowan K, Bennett DC, et al. Novel vitiligo susceptibility loci on chromosomes 7 (AIS2) and 8 (AIS3), confirmation of SLEV1 on chromosome 17, and their roles in an autoimmune diathesis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:188–91. [PubMed]
  • Spritz RA. The genetics of generalized vitiligo. Curr Dir Autoimmun. 2008;10:244–57. [PubMed]
  • Spritz RA. The genetics of generalized vitiligo: autoimmune pathways and an inverse relationship with malignant melanoma. Genome Med. 2010;2:78. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Spritz RA. Recent progress in the genetics of generalized vitiligo. J Genet Genomics. 2011;38:271–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stüttgen G. Die Vitilgio in erbbiologischer Betrachtung. Z Haut Geschlenkskr. 1950;9:451–6. [PubMed]
  • Sun X, Xu A, Wei X, Ouyang, et al. Genetic epidemiology of vitiligo: a study of 815 probands and their families from south China. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:1176–81. [PubMed]
  • Taïeb A, Picardo M. Vitiligo. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:160–9. [PubMed]
  • Teindel H. Familiäre. Z Haut Geschlenkskr. 1950;9:456–62.
  • Toyofuku K, Wada I, Spritz RA, et al. The molecular basis of oculocutaneous albinism type 1 (OCA1): sorting failure and degradation of mutant tyrosinases results in a lack of pigmentation. Biochem J. 2001;355:259–69. [PubMed]
  • Tripathi RK, Giebel LB, Strunk KM, et al. A polymorphism of the human tyrosinase gene that is associated with temperature-sensitive enzymatic activity. Gene Expr. 1991;1:103–10. [PubMed]
  • Tripathi RK, Flanders DJ, Young TL, et al. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) locus lacks linkage to human vitiligo or osteopetrosis: an evaluation. Pigment Cell Res. 1999;12:187–92. [PubMed]
  • Wasfi AI, Saha N, El Munshid HA, et al. Genetic association in vitiligo: ABO, MNSs, Rhesus, Kell and Duffy blood groups. Clin Genet. 1980;17:415–7. [PubMed]
  • Zurawek M, Fichna M, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, et al. A coding variant in NLRP1 is associated with autoimmune Addison’s disease. Hum Immunol. 2010;71:530–4. [PubMed]