Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 January 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3253930

NCI, NHLBI/PBMTC First International Conference on Late Effects after Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Persistent Immune Deficiency in Pediatric Transplant Survivors

Nancy Bunin, M.D., Trudy Small, M.D., Paul Szabolcs, M.D., K. Scott Baker, MD, MS, Michael A. Pulsipher, MD, and Troy Torgerson, M.D., Ph.D.


Defective immune reconstitution is a major barrier to successful hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and has important implications in the pediatric population. There are many factors which affect immune recovery, including stem cell source and GVHD. Complete assessment of immune recovery, including T and B lymphocyte evaluation, innate immunity and response to neoantigens, may provide insight as to infection risk and optimal time for immunizations. The increasing use of cord blood grafts requires additional study regarding early reconstitution and impact upon survival. Immunization schedules may require modification based upon stem cell source and immune reconstitution, and this is of particular importance as many children have been incompletely immunized, or not at all, prior to school entry. Additional studies are needed in children post HCT to evaluate the impact of differing stem cell sources upon immune reconstitution, infectious risks and immunization responses.

Defective immune reconstitution is a major barrier to successful hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), regardless of graft orgin1, 2. Serious infections have been shown to account for a significant percentage (4–20%) of late deaths after HCT.3 Factors which impact immune recovery include graft manipulation, stem cell source and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD). The tempo of immune reconstitution may affect another important pediatric issue--immunizations. Many pediatric patients may have been incompletely immunized, or not at all, prior to receiving chemotherapy and HCT, and the timing, type and response to immunizations may play an important role in preventing morbidity as they begin or reenter school.

In April 2011 the NCI/NHLBI along with the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) sponsored a consensus conference of international experts in clinical and biological research into late effects after HCT convened to review the state of the science of pediatric studies and identify key areas for future research. This manuscript will describe the conclusions shared at that conference relating to assessment of immune status after HCT, differences in immune status after different types of HCT, and approaches to immunization in order to effectively prevent selected viral and bacterial infections after HCT.

Special Issues in Immune Reconstitution: Use of Cord Blood Donors

There is increasing use of unrelated cord blood (UCB) for pediatric patients who lack a matched related donor. Infection-related mortality (IRM) is the primary or secondary cause of death (with or without another major cause such as GvHD) in ≥ 50% of deaths after UCBT with the majority of them occurring in the first 100 days 47. Use of cord blood, a donor cell source composed of predominantly naive cells, raises unique challenges related to immune reconstitution and cell maturation that should be considered in the post-transplant period.

Opportunistic infections negatively impact survival predominantly within the first 3–6 months after UCBT

Investigators from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) highlighted the unique features of infection incidence after UCBT. Outcome after transplantation was analyzed between recipients of either cord blood (n=150) or from marrow that was from HLA-matched (n=367) or mismatched donors (n=83)8. Infection related mortality (IRM) within 100 days after transplantation was significantly higher among recipients of mismatched cord blood than among recipients of either HLA-matched marrow or mismatched marrow (45%, 21%, and 24%, respectively; P=0.01). However, beyond day 100, the proportions of infection-related deaths were similar in the three groups. Importantly, at later time period there was a trend towards less serious infection in the UCBT group corroborating the findings of IBMTR report8. It appears that the profound immune deficit in the first 6 months post UCBT may be followed by significant improvements of protective immunity. This period of improving immunocompetence coincides with the time of thymic recovery.

The Kinetics of Cellular Immune Recovery after UCBT and Prognostic Factors

Despite some experimental data that neonatal myeloid cells are hypofunctional 9, there is no evidence that post-UCBT the engrafting myeloid granulocytes or monocytes would have reduced function compromising their migratory, phagocytic, or bacterial killing capacity10. Despite the fairly rapid recovery of the innate immune system attaining normal values within the first months, T lymphocyte recovery is variable and numerically remains below age matched normal range for several months. In addition to lymphopenia there is co-existent functional compromise that may be explained by immunosuppressive medications and intrinsic factors such as antigen naivite and TH1/Tc1 immaturity. Investigators from Lyon and Marseille compared the tempo of lymphocyte recovery of 112 children who received UCBT with those (n=114)) who received unrelated bone marrow transplant (UBMT)11. Notably, median time for CD4+ T cell and NK cell recovery was not dissimilar in UCBT and UBMT recipients; however, CD8+ T cell recovery was delayed after UCBT with a median time to reach CD8+ T cells > 0.25 × 10e9/l almost 8 months for UCBT recipients, in contrast to approximately 3 months for pediatric BMT recipients (p< 0.001). Significant B lymphocyte recovery may not commence before ~8–10 weeks. However, the recovery of CD19+ lymphocytes may recover faster after UCBT compared to unrelated donor BMT11. In contrast, NK cell recovery is prompt in both adults and children attaining normal frequencies in blood by the first 2 months, similar to recipients of bone marrow1113.

Time Sensitive Predictors of Survival After Single Cord UCBT Measured between Day 100 And 1 Year

Dendritic cell and lymphocyte recovery may impact on survival post transplant. Between July 2005, and December 2007, 93 children with full donor chimerism following myeloablative conditioning (MAC) were longitudinally assessed at Duke University for reconstitution of DC and T cell subsets, B and NK cells by 4 color FACS. Measurements were taken at Day (D) 100, 180, 270 and 365 to determine thresholds associated with overall survival (OS). Parameters were dichotomized at the median (M) of each time point and hazard ratios estimated by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients were transplanted for non-malignant (N=63) and malignant diseases (N=30). Median age was 2.1 years, 58% male, 36% were 4/6, 42% were 5/6 and 23% were 6/6 HLA matched. OS at 2-years was 76%. At D100, lower percentage and absolute numbers of regulatory T cells (CD25+/CD62L+/CD4+Tregs) was associated with death (p=0.04 and p=0.02). A higher fraction of “activated” HLA-DR expressing CD8+ T cells predicted death at D100 with marginal significance at 180 and 270 while absolute numbers significant at D270. At D180, a period when thymic function may resume after MAC, recent thymic emigrants was associated with OS (RTE, CD45RA+/CD62L+ T cells), p=0.01 and p=0.04. Higher levels of ‘plasmacytoid’ CD123+ DC were consistently associated with better outcome after D100 (p<0.05). Major lymphocyte subsets, B, NK, CD3+, CD4+ T cells were NOT associated with superior outcome except at D180 when all lymphocytes were combined, exceeding an ALC >1180/ul (p=0.04). Figure 1A–C depicts a survival curve of patients who are below or above the median cut-off values for immune parameters at the designated time point; Fig 1A at Day 100, Fig 1B at Day 180, and Fig 1C at 1 year. These data demonstrate that different immune cell subsets will have unique kinetics and dynamics of recovery that confer shifting power in predicting outcome when tested at different time points within the first year. Nevertheless, by the second half of the first year, superior pDC and RTE recovery along with a lower activation state (%HLA-DR) are independently associated with better OS. These results should greatly facilitate the development of risk models for the early identification of those at highest risk of death and who may benefit from timely immunotherapy interventions

Figure 1
Survival According to Selected Parameters of Immune Recovery

Immune reconstitution: Evaluation

Evaluating Immune Reconstitution of the T cell Compartment

T cells play critical roles in host defense against viral and fungal pathogens. They are essential for directing appropriate antibody responses, and they assist in regulating the immune response and maintaining tolerance. Absent or defective T cell responses therefore have broad implications for infectious susceptibility and development of GVHD in the post-transplant period. Traditionally, assessment of the recovery of T cells after HCT has focused on relatively crude measures of numbers and function including simple enumeration of CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cells and in vitro proliferative responses to mitogens measured by incorporation of [H3]thymidine into the DNA of replicating cells or by CFSE dye-dilution studies using flow cytometry. Improved flow cytometry and molecular tools have now made a more detailed analysis of T cell recovery post-HCT possible. These tools can be applied to evaluate development and maturation of specific T cell subsets, assess thymic function and thymic T cell output, and to evaluate T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire diversity (Table I).

Table I
– Assessment of T and B Cell Compartments Post-HCT

Abnormalities in development and maturation of both CD4 and CD8 T cells may be observed after HCT, particularly in the setting of cGVHD, which has been shown to cause skewing to a more activated, effector memory phenotype in both populations14, 15. Pairing of high-resolution immunophenotyping with measurement of TRECs can provide an estimate of thymic function and naive T cell output after HCT. Similar to effector T cells, reconstitution of regulatory T cells (Tregs) can be monitored after HCT by flow cytometry using an immunophenotyping panel that includes antibodies to CD4, CD25, CD127, and FOXP3.

Evaluating Immune Reconstitution of the B cell Compartment

B cell dysfunction, particularly the inability to generate functional antibody responses, is typically associated with susceptibility to recurrent sinopulmonary infections. Several studies have shown that under ideal circumstances, humoral immune responses to new antigens return as early as 6 months post transplant even though immune reconstitution is not yet complete16, 17. B cell development and maturation, however, can be significantly altered in the posttransplant period, especially in the setting of ongoing immune suppression or chronic GVHD. A small number of recent studies have shown that cGVHD is associated with marked B cell abnormalities including a general B cell lymphopenia and altered B cell maturation including a significant increase in transitional, immature, and naive B cell subsets with a concomitant decrease in mature, CD27+ memory B cells and class-switched memory B cells1820. Under normal circumstances, B cell lymphopenia and absence of mature B cells is associated with high circulating levels of B cell activating factor (BAFF/BLyS/TALL-1), which plays important roles in stimulating proliferation and preventing apoptosis of B cells. Not surprisingly then, cGVHD is also associated with high circulating BAFF levels and in addition, a concomitant decrease in cell surface expression of the major BAFF receptor (BAFF-R) on the surface of B cells.

Innate Immunity

A growing understanding of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms combined with technical advancements that make assessment of these feasible, has made it possible to more effectively assess immune function after HCT. The most extensively studied of these mechanisms are the Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which allow cells to respond to a variety of molecules produced by pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and fungi In humans. The TLR proteins are encoded by 10 different genes, each of which encodes a protein capable of recognizing a different pathogen-derived product. Recent studies have evaluated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TLR proteins, some of which are known to affect TLR function, may be associated with susceptibility to specific pathogens in the post-transplant period. Interestingly, three studies have now suggested an association between TLR polymorphisms and invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients undergoing HCT2123. These studies suggest that alterations in TLR function either in non-hematopoietic cells (pulmonary epithelial cells, etc.) of the recipient or in hematopoietic cells from the donor alter susceptibility to specific pathogens in HCT recipients.

Use of Neoantigens to Assess Functional Immune Recovery

Measurement of the immune response to vaccination is an effective method to globally assess immune reconstitution because it requires effective antigen presentation, B cells capable of responding to antigen, and adequate T cell help. Unfortunately, routine vaccines are not ideal for evaluating immune reconstitution because these are likely to elicit recall responses from both donor and host cells, making them an ineffective measure of the immune system’s ability to respond to new challenges. In addition, they cannot be effectively used to evaluate immune responses in patients receiving supplemental immunoglobulin because of the presence of antibodies to routine antigens in the IgG preparations. Assessment of immunocompetency in the post-transplant period is therefore most effectively judged using a neoantigen that neither the donor nor recipient has been exposed to previously. Ideally, the neoantigen would also be one that the general population has not been broadly exposed to so that there would be little measurable antibody in pooled IgG preparations, allowing responses to be measured even in individuals who may be receiving ongoing IgG supplementation. Three most commonly used neoantigens that fit these criteria include Bacteriophage [var phi]X174, Rabies vaccine, and Keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH).

Immune Reconstitution and Immunizations

Most articles addressing vaccination post HCT have focused on unmodified HLA matched sibling transplant recipients, with few studies including large numbers of unrelated HCT recipients or details about the extent or amount of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with chronic GVHD. There are no studies devoted exclusively to recipients of cord blood transplants, a population whose response to immunizations may differ significantly from other transplant groups due to the lack of transfer of memory T- and B-cells in the cord blood graft(s). All vaccine guidelines, including those published in 2009 24, acknowledge the variability in immune reconstitution following alternative donor transplants and the lack of studies assessing vaccine responses in these patient populations. Although vaccination at fixed times post HCT will likely be sufficient for highly immunogenic vaccines such as tetanus and polio, for others (hepatitis B, pneumococcus, meningococcus, and varicella) some studies have suggested that vaccination prior to the acquisition of critical populations of T and B cells may result in low response rates with inadequate durability of response. The 2009 influenza pandemic 25, recent increases in pertussis26 and drug resistant pneumococci 27, and outbreaks of measles 28 and mumps 29 in immunocompetent individuals highlight the need for effective revaccination of HCT patients. Vaccine preventable diseases such as those caused by pneumococcus 30, influenza31, herpes zoster 32 and Bordetella pertussis 26, 33 cause significant morbidity and to a lesser extent mortality even in immunocompetent individuals34. Many of these infections occur more frequently in HCT recipients and remain a significant cause of morbidity, re-hospitalization, and mortality after successful HCT3538. Following autologous and allogeneic transplantation, patients lack immunity against pertussis and rapidly lose protection against pneumococcus and haemophilus influenza (reviewed in 24, 39). In the absence of revaccination, the majority of patients will become susceptible to measles, mumps, or rubella by 3–5 years post.

Since 1995, efforts have been made to immunize HCT recipients against vaccine preventable diseases in a standardized fashion. Both the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) 40 and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 41 have published guidelines which differ in the number of recommended doses of tetanus, polio, and Haemophilus influenza vaccines, as well as the time to initiate re-vaccination 24, 39. In 2009 24, an international committee of infectious disease and transplant physicians met under the auspices of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), to develop an updated, unified international set of vaccine guidelines for autologous and allogeneic transplant recipients. These guidelines differ from prior guidelines primarily by 1) inclusion of the 7-valent protein conjugated pneumococcal vaccine (PCV7) (3 monthly doses) in all patients starting at 3–6 months post HCT, followed by PPV23 in patients without chronic GVHD 2) use of the live varicella vaccine in select patient groups starting at 24 months post HCT, and 3) optional use of vaccines licensed since 2005 such as the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) for adolescents and adults, the recombinant human papilloma vaccine 42, and the protein conjugated meningococcal vaccine 43. An important limitation of both current and past HCT vaccine guidelines is the recommendation that all patients should be vaccinated at fixed times post HCT. This does not take into account the variable kinetics of immune reconstitution on the basis of age, donor, stem cell source 4448 or use of monoclonal antibodies such as anti-CD20 49. In addition, guidelines can quickly become outdated due to licensing of new vaccines 50, 51, resulting in changes in recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to better protect immunocompetent patients.

Immunogenicity of Vaccines Post HCT

Multiple studies have demonstrated the superior response of patients re-immunized with 3 doses of tetanus toxoid, inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), and/or the protein conjugated Haemophilus influenza vaccine (HIB) compared to those given a single vaccine 5259 as well as the benefit of donor immunization prior to stem cell harvest in the case of HIB, diphtheria, and tetanus toxoid 5759. In addition, published reports have shown the poor or transient responses of HCT recipients to pure polyscaccharide vaccines such as PPV23 and MSV4 5964 compared to the protein conjugated polysaccharide vaccines (ie HIB, Prevnar 7)65, 66, 67.

The results of a randomized, prospective multi-center trial performed in 158 patients (aged 5–65 years of age) was reported by Cordonnier et al in 200968. All patients received an allogeneic HCT and myeloablative conditioning. Approximately 65% of patients in both groups had no acute GVHD and limited or no chronic GVHD was seen in 56% and 33% of patients, respectively. The study demonstrated similar responses in both groups when tested one month after the third PCV7 dose (79% vs 82%, p=0.64), although the percentage of patients who still had positive titers to all 7 seroytpes at 24 months post HCT was significantly lower in patients vaccinated early vs later post HCT (59% vs 83%, p=0.013).. As Prevnar7 is no longer manufactured, a multi-center, prospective international trial of a series of three PCV13 immunizations followed by a booster Prevnar13 and the PPV23 in adults and children is currently underway.

Vaccines against viral diseases

Vaccination against hepatitis B is often mandatory for entry to school and required for certain jobs 69. In a study of 267 allogeneic transplant recipients immunized with rHBV following acquisition of pre-set milestones of immune competence, 64% seroconverted 70 including 73% of 99 children, and 59% of 168 adults (p = 0.02). In multivariate analyses, response was adversely affected by age >18 years (p<0.01) and history of prior chronic GVHD (p<0.0001) but not by donor type, use of T cell depletion, adoptive immunotherapy, or post transplant rituximab 70. Evaluation of serial titers in 98 patients demonstrated that 80 remained seropositive five years after their last vaccine. As the time to develop normal numbers of CD27+IgD+ memory B cells and CD4 helper cells varies among different allogeneic HCT populations 71, surrogate markers such as these may be instrumental in determining the need and timing of booster immunizations to maintain durable protection.

The majority of children will become seronegative for measles, mumps, and rubella by three years post HCT. King et al demonstrated that 68% of children given MMR at a median of 48 months post HCT responded to all three attenuated viruses 72. Also, there are limited data on the immunogenicity and durability of response to MMR following alternative donor HCT or response to mumps following any type of HCT 73. Of 113 children immunized with MMR at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center following an HLA matched sibling (n=60) or unrelated (n=38) HCT, the response was 70% following a single MMR, including 42 recipients of an HLA matched related HCT and 27 recipients of an unrelated HCT (p=NS). There were no significant adverse reactions, even in non-responders 73.

There is widespread use of influenza vaccines, but there is limited data on response of HCT recipients to the killed influenza vaccine, particularly the H1N1 strain., Studies have shown a relatively poor response 74, 75. Although immunization with the inactivated influenza vaccine has been shown by Machado et al. to decrease the risk of influenza when administered >6 months post HCT (2 of 19 vaccinated vs 12 of 24 unvaccinated) 74, the majority of serious infections occur earlier post HCT, when vaccine response to influenza is very poor.

Since licensing of the live attenuated varicella vaccine (LAVV) in 1995, an increasing number of children, adolescents, and young adults undergoing HCT or donating stem cells have been protected against varicella by one or two doses of the LAVV. As the LAVV generally induces lower levels of antibody titers than natural infection, with titers that decrease over time post vaccination, two LAVV are recommended for VZ seronegative individuals76, 77. Only a limited number of studies have evaluated the LAVV in children post HCT. In the study by Sauerbrei, 15 children (median age 18 months) received LAVV following an autologous (n=7) or allogeneic (n=8) HCT78. Patients had a circulating lymphocyte count of >1000/ul, IgG >500 mg/dL, and a positive skin test to a recall antigen such as Candida. Studies have documented safety and seroconversion in >60% of evaluable patients 79, 80.

Vaccines approved since 2005

Protein-conjugated meningococcal vaccines. In 2010 81, a quadravalent protein conjugated meningococcal vaccine was licensed in the United States. Unlike the pure polysaccharide vaccine, this vaccines elicits a T cell dependent B cell response yielding the potential to induce long-term memory. There have been small studies showing either poor response, or rapid decrease in response following a single immunization 82.

Tetanus, reduced diphtheria and acellular pertussis

Currently there are two vaccines containing tetanus, reduced diphtheria and acellular pertussis toxoids (Tdap) approved for individuals 10–55 years of age. These vaccines contain similar amounts of tetanus and diphtheria toxoid, but different amounts of pertussis toxoid (PT) (2.5 vs 8 mcg/dose). Response to a single TDAP is poor83, 84 in allogeneic or autologous HCT recipients likely due in part to the small amount of PT contained in the vaccine and the limited numbers of memory specific T and B cells transferred from the graft capable of a pertussis response.

Recommendations: Immune Reconstitution


For most patients, T cell reconstitution after transplant can be adequately monitored using a combination of lymphocyte subset analysis, “high content” immunophenotyping, and evaluation of T cell proliferative capacity to mitogens. In patients who demonstrate poor T cell reconstitution, persistent susceptibility to viral or fungal infections, or significant autoimmunity/GVHD, additional testing may be of benefit to more completely assess thymic T cell output, Treg numbers, T cell function, and TCR diversity.

B cells

As discussed, B cell responses to neoantigen return approximately 6 months after transplant, we therefore suggest that this is an appropriate time to begin to follow B cell reconstitution and maturation by “high-content” B cell immunophenotyping (including cell surface BAFF-R expression). Over time, a normal maturation of B cells from immature to mature naive then to a mature memory phenotype (CD27+) should be observed. Persistently poor B cell development with an absence of memory B cells, decreased cell surface BAFF-R levels, and high serum BAFF may be indicative of cGVHD810. In addition, these studies can help to identify those patients who may need further evaluation by neoantigen immunization and/or ongoing treatment with supplemental immunoglobulin.

Neoantigen challenge

Very valuable to assess functional immunity in patients who have evidence of poor or incomplete immune reconstitution (based on immunophenotyping) or who have chronic GVHD. Rabies vaccine is currently available clinically but Bacteriophage and KLH are available only on study protocols. Patients who demonstrate poor responses to neoantigen challenge should be considered for ongoing antimicrobial prophylaxis and immunoglobulin supplementation (IVIg, SCIg, etc.).

Recommendations: Vaccination

Given the increased use of unrelated and cord blood donors and of conditioning regimens of varying intensity over the last 10 years, it remains unclear whether vaccination according to fixed times post HCT will protect the majority of HCT recipients. All vaccine guidelines, including those published in 2009 24, acknowledge the variability in immune reconstitution following alternative donor transplants and the lack of studies assessing vaccine responses in these patient populations. Although vaccination at fixed times post HCT will likely be sufficient for highly immunogenic vaccines such as tetanus and polio, for others such as hepatitis B, pneumococcus, meningococcus, and varicella, some studies have suggested that vaccination prior to the acquisition of critical populations of T- and B- cells may hinder response rates and the durability of response. Current recommendations to immunize with live attenuated viral vaccines at 24 months are somewhat arbitrary, particularly since studies have shown earlier vaccination is safe. Earlier vaccination with live vaccines would be particularly useful in children returning to school during the first transplant year who are vulnerable to these infections.

Current vaccine guidelines therefore recommend yearly inactivated influenza vaccination in patients ≥6 months post HCT, strongly advocate immunization of household members and caretakers, and stress prompt evaluation of patients with respiratory symptoms so that early anti-viral therapy can be instituted in infected patients 24.

In 2011, the ACIP recommended a two dose series of conjugated meningococcal vaccine in individuals with functional or congenital asplenia, complement deficiency, or HIV infected individuals 83. Consideration of a similar two dose series administered two months apart should be evaluated in HCT recipients.

The 2009 CIBMTR guidelines recommended a series of Tdap containing 8 ug of pertussis toxoid/dose 24. The effectiveness of this strategy is currently being tested.

Future Research

The increasing use of cord blood as an alternative HSC source requires additional research into the kinetics of immune reconstitution and its impact upon outcome. In addition, it is unknown as to whether cord blood outcomes may be predicted based upon varying subsets of immune recovery.

Several studies have suggested the value of assessing specific parameters of immune reconstitution as biomarkers for cGVHD and predictors of outcome. Recent studies have suggested B cell immunophenotyping and serum BAFF levels may be particularly informative. These studies should be extended to include more patients in order to validate these findings in a broader patient population. In addition, the increasing availability of Next generation sequencing technologies could be incorporated to allow the further study of polymorphic variants of Toll-like receptors (TLR) and other immunity-related proteins in transplant patients. Identified variants may be useful to stratify risk and possibly identify patients who require specific therapies (i.e. prolonged antifungal prophylaxis, etc.) in the post-transplant period.

In an ideal setting, neoantigen could be used to evaluate the reconstitution of functional immunity in every patient after transplant. Unfortunately, the cost (sometimes not covered by insurance) and the clinical inaccessibility of common neoantigens impedes their regular use. A prospective study of neoantigen responses in a wide variety of HCT scenarios should be a high priority to evaluate the clinical utility of this approach for identifying patients at risk of serious late infections and to determine how these tools may be most effectively used and made more broadly available.

Future vaccine trials should ideally include parallel assessments of in vitro parameters of immune reconstitution to determine whether surrogate markers of immune reconstitution can predict vaccine response. In vitro correlates of vaccine responses might allow earlier revaccination of patients with the requisite T and B cell populations and prevent premature vaccination and/or risk in patients unable to respond. Studies assessing the recombinant human papilloma virus vaccine, particularly in children with increased risk such as those with Fanconi anemia or certain primary immunodeficiency diseases are warranted as are trials evaluating earlier vaccination of children without GVHD against varicella, measles, mumps, and rubella. Current recommendations to immunize with live attenuated viral vaccines at 24 months are somewhat arbitrary, particularly since studies have shown earlier vaccination is safe. This would be particularly useful in children returning to school during the first transplant year who are vulnerable to these infections.


Funding for this work was made possible in part by the following National Institute of Health grants: 1R13CA159788-01 (MP, KSB), U01HL069254 (MP), R01 CA112530-05 (KSB), 5RO1 CA132110 (PS), and 5R01HL091749 (PS). The views expressed in this manuscript do not reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention by trade names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Further support was provided by a generous grant from the St. Baldrick’s Foundation and the Lance Armstrong Foundation, as well as the following pharmaceutical companies: Genzyme, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of those that provided funding.


Financial Disclosures: None

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Antin JH. Immune reconstitution: the major barrier to successful stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(2 Suppl 2):43–5. [PubMed]
2. Fry TJ, Mackall CL. Immune reconstitution following hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation: challenges for the future. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;35 (Suppl 1):S53–7. [PubMed]
3. Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Wang Z, Sobocinski KA, Jacobsohn D, et al. Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2230–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Rocha V, Gluckman E. Clinical use of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(1 Suppl 1):34–41. [PubMed]
5. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR, et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(22):1565–77. [PubMed]
6. Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A, et al. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(22):2276–85. [PubMed]
7. Kurtzberg J, Carter SL, Baxter-Lowe LA, Feig SA, Guinan EC, Kamani NR, et al. Results of the cord blood transplantation study (COBLT): Clinical outcomes of 193 unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation in pediatric patients with malignant conditions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005:2. [PubMed]
8. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, Champlin RE, et al. Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(22):2265–75. [PubMed]
9. Strunk T, Temming P, Gembruch U, Reiss I, Bucsky P, Schultz C. Differential maturation of the innate immune response in human fetuses. Pediatr Res. 2004;56(2):219–26. [PubMed]
10. Abu-Ghosh A, Goldman S, Slone V, van de Ven C, Suen Y, Murphy L, et al. Immunological reconstitution and correlation of circulating serum inflammatory mediators/cytokines with the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease during the first 100 days following unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;24(5):535–44. [PubMed]
11. Renard C, Barlogis V, Mialou V, Galambrun C, Bernoux D, Goutagny MP, et al. Lymphocyte subset reconstitution after unrelated cord blood or bone marrow transplantation in children. Br J Haematol. 2011;152(3):322–30. [PubMed]
12. Moretta A, Maccario R, Fagioli F, Giraldi E, Busca A, Montagna D, et al. Analysis of immune reconstitution in children undergoing cord blood transplantation. Exp Hematol. 2001;29(3):371–9. [PubMed]
13. Brahmi Z, Hommel-Berrey G, Smith F, Thomson B. NK cells recover early and mediate cytotoxicity via perforin/granzyme and Fas/FasL pathways in umbilical cord blood recipients. Hum Immunol. 2001;62(8):782–90. [PubMed]
14. Fukunaga A, Ishikawa T, Kishihata M, Shindo T, Hori T, Uchiyama T. Altered homeostasis of CD4(+) memory T cells in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: chronic graft-versus-host disease enhances T cell differentiation and exhausts central memory T cell pool. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13(10):1176–84. [PubMed]
15. Grogan BM, Tabellini L, Storer B, Bumgarner TE, Astigarraga CC, Flowers ME, et al. Activation and expansion of CD8(+) T effector cells in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17(8):1121–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Witherspoon RP, Storb R, Ochs HD, Fluornoy N, Kopecky KJ, Sullivan KM, et al. Recovery of antibody production in human allogeneic marrow graft recipients: influence of time posttransplantation, the presence or absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease, and antithymocyte globulin treatment. Blood. 1981;58(2):360–8. [PubMed]
17. Witherspoon RP, Kopecky K, Storb RF, Flournoy N, Sullivan KM, Sosa R, et al. Immunological recovery in 48 patients following syngeneic marrow transplantation or hematological malignancy. Transplantation. 1982;33(2):143–9. [PubMed]
18. Greinix HT, Pohlreich D, Kouba M, Kormoczi U, Lohmann I, Feldmann K, et al. Elevated numbers of immature/transitional CD21− B lymphocytes and deficiency of memory CD27+ B cells identify patients with active chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(2):208–19. [PubMed]
19. Sarantopoulos S, Stevenson KE, Kim HT, Cutler CS, Bhuiya NS, Schowalter M, et al. Altered B-cell homeostasis and excess BAFF in human chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2009;113(16):3865–74. [PubMed]
20. Kuzmina Z, Greinix HT, Weigl R, Kormoczi U, Rottal A, Frantal S, et al. Significant differences in B-cell subpopulations characterize patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease-associated dysgammaglobulinemia. Blood. 2011;117(7):2265–74. [PubMed]
21. Kesh S, Mensah NY, Peterlongo P, Jaffe D, Hsu K, MVDB, et al. TLR1 and TLR6 polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1062:95–103. [PubMed]
22. Bochud PY, Chien JW, Marr KA, Leisenring WM, Upton A, Janer M, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms and aspergillosis in stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(17):1766–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. de Boer MG, Jolink H, Halkes CJ, van der Heiden PL, Kremer D, Falkenburg JH, et al. Influence of polymorphisms in innate immunity genes on susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis after stem cell transplantation. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18403. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Ljungman P, Cordonnier C, Einsele H, Englund J, Machado CM, Storek J, et al. Vaccination of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44(8):521–6. [PubMed]
25. Shapshak P, Chiappelli F, Somboonwit C, Sinnott J. The influenza pandemic of 2009: lessons and implications. Mol Diagn Ther. 2011;15(2):63–81. [PubMed]
26. Broder KR, Cortese MM, Iskander JK, Kretsinger K, Slade BA, Brown KH, et al. Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-3):1–34. [PubMed]
27. Song JH, Chung DR. Respiratory infections due to drug-resistant bacteria. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010;24(3):639–53. [PubMed]
28. United States J-M. 2011 Measles. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(20):666–668. [PubMed]
29. Prevention CfDCa. Update: mumps outbreak - New York and New Jersey. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly. 2010;59:125–129. [PubMed]
30. (ACIP) RotACoIP. Prevention of Pneumococcal Disease. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46(RR08):1–24. [PubMed]
31. 1976–2007 US. Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:1057–1062. [PubMed]
32. Sampathkumar P, Drage LA, Martin DP. Herpes zoster (shingles) and postherpetic neuralgia. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(3):274–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. De Serres G, Shadmani R, Duval B, Boulianne N, Dery P, Douville Fradet M, et al. Morbidity of pertussis in adolescents and adults. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(1):174–9. [PubMed]
34. Ada G. Vaccines and vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(14):1042–53. [PubMed]
35. Socie G, Salooja N, Cohen A, Rovelli A, Carreras E, Locasciulli A, et al. Nonmalignant late effects after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2003;101(9):3373–85. [PubMed]
36. Chen CS, Boeckh M, Seidel K, Clark JG, Kansu E, Madtes DK, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and mortality from pneumonia developing late after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32(5):515–22. [PubMed]
37. Leung TF, Chik KW, Li CK, Lai H, Shing MM, Chan PK, et al. Incidence, risk factors and outcome of varicella-zoster virus infection in children after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25(2):167–72. [PubMed]
38. Nichols WG, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Influenza infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, mortality, and the effect of antiviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(9):1300–6. [PubMed]
39. Ljungman P, Cordonnier C, de Bock R, Einsele H, Engelhard D, Grundy J, et al. Immunizations after bone marrow transplantation: results of a European survey and recommendations from the infectious diseases working party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15(3):455–60. [PubMed]
40. Ljungman P, Engelhard D, de la Camara R, Einsele H, Locasciulli A, Martino R, et al. Vaccination of stem cell transplant recipients: recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;35(8):737–46. [PubMed]
41. Prevention CfDCa. Guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Recommendations of CDC, the Infectious Disease Society of America, and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly. 2000;49:1–128. [PubMed]
42. Villa LL, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, Costa RL, Petta CA, Andrade RP, et al. Immunologic responses following administration of a vaccine targeting human papillomavirus Types 6, 11, 16, and 18. Vaccine. 2006;24(27–28):5571–83. [PubMed]
43. Bilukha OO, Rosenstein N. Prevention and control of meningococcal disease. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-7):1–21. [PubMed]
44. Small TN, Keever CA, Weiner-Fedus S, Heller G, O’Reilly RJ, Flomenberg N. B-cell differentiation following autologous, conventional, or T-cell depleted bone marrow transplantation: a recapitulation of normal B-cell ontogeny. Blood. 1990;76(8):1647–56. [PubMed]
45. Small TN, Papadopoulos EB, Boulad F, Black P, Castro-Malaspina H, Childs BH, et al. Comparison of immune reconstitution after unrelated and related T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: effect of patient age and donor leukocyte infusions. Blood. 1999;93(2):467–80. [PubMed]
46. Storek J, Joseph A, Dawson MA, Douek DC, Storer B, Maloney DG. Factors influencing T-lymphopoiesis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;73(7):1154–8. [PubMed]
47. Storek J, Wells D, Dawson MA, Storer B, Maloney DG. Factors influencing B lymphopoiesis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2001;98(2):489–91. [PubMed]
48. Keever-Taylor CA, Wagner JE, Kernan NA, Small TN, Carter SL, Thompson JS, et al. Comparison of immune recovery in recipients of unmanipulated vs T-cell-depleted grafts from unrelated donors in a multicenter randomized phase II-III trial (T-cell depletion trial) Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(3):587–9. [PubMed]
49. Pao M, Papadopoulos EB, Boulad F, Castro-Malaspina H, Jakubowski A, Kernan NA, et al. Response to immunizations following allogeneic HCT with adjuvant rituximab therapy. Blood. 2005;106(11):906a–906a. [PubMed]
50. (ACIP) ACoIP. Licensure of a 13-valent pneumonococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and recommendations for use among children. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:258–261. [PubMed]
51. Ljungman P, Small T. Update to Vaccination Guidelines. Biol Blood marrow Transplant. 2011;10:21–33. [PubMed]
52. Ljungman P, Duraj V, Magnius L. Response to immunization against polio after allogeneic marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;7(2):89–93. [PubMed]
53. Parkkali T, Olander RM, Ruutu T, Vuontela K, Volin L, Eskola J, et al. A randomized comparison between early and late vaccination with tetanus toxoid vaccine after allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;19(9):933–8. [PubMed]
54. Parkkali T, Stenvik M, Ruutu T, Hovi T, Volin L, Ruutu P. Randomized comparison of early and late vaccination with inactivated poliovirus vaccine after allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;20(8):663–8. [PubMed]
55. Parkkali T, Kayhty H, Hovi T, Olander RM, Roivainen M, Volin L, et al. A randomized study on donor immunization with tetanus-diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae type b and inactivated poliovirus vaccines to improve the recipient responses to the same vaccines after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(3):179–88. [PubMed]
56. Molrine DC, Guinan EC, JHA, et al. Donor immunization with Haemophilus influenzae type b (HIB)-conjugate vaccine in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1991;87:3012–3018. [PubMed]
57. Storek J, Dawson MA, Lim LC, Burman BE, Stevens-Ayers T, Viganego F, et al. Efficacy of donor vaccination before hematopoietic cell transplantation and recipient vaccination both before and early after transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33(3):337–46. [PubMed]
58. Hammarstrom V, Pauksen K, Azinge J, Oberg G, Ljungman P. Pneumococcal immunity and response to immunization with pneumococcal vaccine in bone marrow transplant patients: the influence of graft versus host reaction. Support Care Cancer. 1993;1(4):195–9. [PubMed]
59. Barra A, Bremard-Oury C, Bajart A, Griscelli C, Fritzell B, Preud’homme JL. Immunogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide and its tetanus toxoid conjugate in patients with recurrent infections or humoral immunodeficiency. Int J Clin Lab Res. 1992;21(3):231–4. [PubMed]
60. Guinan EC, Molrine DC, Antin JH, Lee MC, Weinstein HJ, Sallan SE, et al. Polysaccharide conjugate vaccine responses in bone marrow transplant patients. Transplantation. 1994;57(5):677–84. [PubMed]
61. Avanzini MA, Carra AM, Maccario R, Zecca M, Pignatti P, Marconi M, et al. Antibody response to pneumococcal vaccine in children receiving bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Immunol. 1995;15(3):137–44. [PubMed]
62. Spoulou V, Victoratos P, Ioannidis JP, Grafakos S. Kinetics of antibody concentration and avidity for the assessment of immune response to pneumococcal vaccine among children with bone marrow transplants. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(3):965–9. [PubMed]
63. Parkkali T, Kayhty H, Lehtonen H, Ruutu T, Volin L, Eskola J, et al. Tetravalent meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine is immunogenic in adult allogeneic BMT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27(1):79–84. [PubMed]
64. Molrine DC, Antin JH, Guinan EC, Soiffer RJ, MacDonald K, Malley R, et al. Donor immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and early protective antibody responses following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2003;101(3):831–6. [PubMed]
65. Antin JH, Guinan EC, Avigan D, Soiffer RJ, Joyce RM, Martin VJ, et al. Protective antibody responses to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(3):213–22. [PubMed]
66. Meisel R, Kuypers L, Dirksen U, Schubert R, Gruhn B, Strauss G, et al. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine provides early protective antibody responses in children after related and unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2007;109(6):2322–6. [PubMed]
67. Pao M, Papadopoulos EB, Chou J, Glenn H, Castro-Malaspina H, Jakubowski AA, et al. Response to pneumococcal (PNCRM7) and haemophilus influenzae conjugate vaccines (HIB) in pediatric and adult recipients of an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(9):1022–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Cordonnier C, Labopin M, Chesnel V, Ribaud P, De La Camara R, Martino R, et al. Randomized study of early versus late immunization with pneumococcal conjugate vaccine after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(10):1392–401. [PubMed]
69. Prevention CfDCa. Hepatitis B virus: a comprehensive strategy for eliminating transmission in the United States through universal childhood vaccination: recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory committee (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 1991;40 (RR-13):1–25. [PubMed]
70. Jaffe D, Papadopoulos EB, Young JW, O’Reilly RJ, Prockop S, Kernan NA, et al. Immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (rHBV) in recipients of unrelated or related allogeneic hematopoietic cell (HC) transplants. Blood. 2006;108(7):2470–5. [PubMed]
71. D’Orsogna LJ, Wright MP, Krueger RG, McKinnon EJ, Buffery SI, Witt CS, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients have defects of both switched and IgM memory B cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(7):795–803. [PubMed]
72. King SM, Saunders EF, Petric M, Gold R. Response to measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in paediatric bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996;17(4):633–6. [PubMed]
73. Small TN, Papadopoulos EB, Bolulad F, et al. Vaccine responses following unmodified or T cell depleted unrelated and mismatched related HCT. Blood. 2011;104:612.
74. Machado CM, Cardoso MR, da Rocha IF, Boas LS, Dulley FL, Pannuti CS. The benefit of influenza vaccination after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;36(10):897–900. [PubMed]
75. Engelhard D, Nagler A, Hardan I, Morag A, Aker M, Baciu H, et al. Antibody response to a two-dose regimen of influenza vaccine in allogeneic T cell-depleted and autologous BMT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993;11(1):1–5. [PubMed]
76. Avetisyan G, Aschan J, Hassan M, Ljungman P. Evaluation of immune responses to seasonal influenza vaccination in healthy volunteers and in patients after stem cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2008;86(2):257–63. [PubMed]
77. Chaves SS, Gargiullo P, Zhang JX, Civen R, Guris D, Mascola L, et al. Loss of vaccine-induced immunity to varicella over time. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(11):1121–9. [PubMed]
78. Sauerbrei A, Prager J, Hengst U, Zintl F, Wutzler P. Varicella vaccination in children after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;20(5):381–3. [PubMed]
79. Kussmaul SC, Horn BN, Dvorak CC, Abramovitz L, Cowan MJ, Weintrub PS. Safety of the live, attenuated varicella vaccine in pediatric recipients of hematopoietic SCTs. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(11):1602–6. [PubMed]
80. Chou JF, Kernan NA, Prockop S, Heller G, Scaradavou A, Kobos R, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of the Live Attenuated Varicella Vaccine following T Replete or T Cell-Depleted Related and Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Cooper B, DeTora L, Stoddard J. Menveo(R)): a novel quadrivalent meningococcal CRM197 conjugate vaccine against serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10(1):21–33. [PubMed]
82. Mahler MB, Taur Y, Jean R, Kernan NA, Prockop SE, Small TN. Safety and Immunogenicity of the Tetravalent Protein-Conjugated Meningococcal Vaccine (MCV4) in Recipients of Related and Unrelated Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Papadopoulos EB, Young JW, Kernan NA, et al. Use of the tetanus toxoid, reduced dose diphtheria and pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in allogeneic transplant (alloHCT) Recipients. Blood. 2008;112:722a.
84. Small TN, Zelenetz AD, Noy A, Rice RD, Trippett TM, Abrey L, et al. Pertussis immunity and response to tetanus-reduced diphtheria-reduced pertussis vaccine (Tdap) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(12):1538–42. [PubMed]