PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nanoreslettspringer open web sitethis articlemanuscript submissionregistrationjournal front pagespringer open web site
 
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011; 6(1): 604.
Published online Nov 23, 2011. doi:  10.1186/1556-276X-6-604
PMCID: PMC3253270
Analytical expression of Kondo temperature in quantum dot embedded in Aharonov-Bohm ring
Ryosuke Yoshiicorresponding author1 and Mikio Eto1
1Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Ryosuke Yoshii: festina.lente/at/a3.keio.jp; Mikio Eto: eto/at/rk.phys.keio.ac.jp
Received September 3, 2010; Accepted November 23, 2011.
We theoretically study the Kondo effect in a quantum dot embedded in an Aharonov-Bohm ring, using the "poor man's" scaling method. Analytical expressions of the Kondo temperature TK are given as a function of magnetic flux Φ penetrating the ring. In this Kondo problem, there are two characteristic lengths, equation M1 and LK = ħvF = TK, where vF is the Fermi velocity and equation M2 is the renormalized energy level in the quantum dot. The former is the screening length of the charge fluctuation and the latter is that of the spin fluctuation, i.e., size of Kondo screening cloud. We obtain diferent expressions of TK(Φ) for (i) Lc [double less-than sign] LK [double less-than sign] L, (ii) Lc [double less-than sign] L [double less-than sign] LK, and (iii) L [double less-than sign] Lc [double less-than sign] LK, where L is the size of the ring. TK is remarkably modulated by Φ in cases (ii) and (iii), whereas it hardly depends on Φ in case (i).
PACS numbers:
Since the first observation of the Kondo effect in semiconductor quantum dots [1-3], various aspects of Kondo physics have been revealed, owing to the artificial tunability and flexibility of the systems, e.g., an enhanced Kondo effect with an even number of electrons at the spin-singlet-triplet degeneracy [4], the SU(4) Kondo effect with S = 1/2 and orbital degeneracy [5], and the bonding and antibonding states between the Kondo resonant levels in coupled quantum dots [6,7]. One of the major issues which still remain unsolved in the Kondo physics is the observation of the Kondo singlet state, so-called Kondo screening cloud. The size of the screening cloud is evaluated as LK = ħvF/TK, where vF is the Fermi velocity and TK is the Kondo temperature. There have been several theoretical works on LK, e.g., ring-size dependence of the persistent current in an isolated ring with an embedded quantum dot [8], Friedel oscillation around a magnetic impurity in metal [9], and spin-spin correlation function [10,11].
We focus on the Kondo effect in a quantum dot embedded in an Aharonov-Bohm (AB) ring. In this system, the conductance shows an asymmetric resonance as a function of energy level in the quantum dot, so-called Fano-Kondo effect. This is due to the coexistence of one-body interference effect and many-body Kondo effect, which was studied by the equation-of-motion method with the Green function [12], the numerical renormalization group method [13], the Bethe ansatz [14], the density-matrix renormalization group method [15], etc. This Fano-Kondo resonance was observed experimentally [16]. The interference effect on the value of TK, however, has not been fully understood [17,18].
In our previous work [19], we examined this problem in the small limit of AB ring using the scaling method [20]. Our theoretical method is as follows. First, we create an equivalent model in which a quantum dot is coupled to a single lead. The AB interference effect is involved in the flux-dependent density of states in the lead. Second, the two-stage scaling method is applied to the reduced model, to renormalize the energy level in the quantum dot by taking into account the charge fluctuation and evaluate TK by taking spin fluctuation [21]. This method yields TK in an analytical form.
The purpose of this article is to derive an analytical expression of TK for the finite size of the AB ring, using our theoretical method. We find two characteristic lengths. One is the screening length of the charge fluctuation, equation M3 with equation M4 being the renormalized energy level in the quantum dot, which appears in the first stage of the scaling. The other is the size of Kondo screening cloud, LK, which is naturally obtained in the second stage. In consequence, the analytical expression of TK is different for situations (i) Lc [double less-than sign] LK [double less-than sign] L, (ii) Lc [double less-than sign] L [double less-than sign] LK, and (iii) L [double less-than sign] Lc [double less-than sign] LK, where L is the size of the ring. We show that TK strongly depends on the magnetic flux Φ penetrating the AB ring in cases (ii) and (iii), whereas it hardly depends on Φ in case (i).
Our model is shown in Figure Figure1a.1a. A quantum dot with an energy level ε0 is connected to two external leads by tunnel couplings, VL and VR. Another arm of the AB ring (reference arm) and external leads are represented by a one-dimensional tight-binding model with transfer integral -t and lattice constant a. The size of the ring is given by L = (2l + 1)a. The reference arm includes a tunnel barrier with transmission probability of Tb = 4x/(1 + x)2 with x = (W/t)2. The AB phase is denoted by ϕ = 2πΦ/Φ0, with flux quantum Φ0 = h/e. The Hamiltonian is
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Model for an Aharonov-Bohm (AB) ring with an embedded quantum dot. A quantum dot with an energy level ε0 is connected to two external leads by tunnel couplings, VL and VR. Another arm of the AB ring (reference arm) and external leads are represented (more ...)
equation M5
(1)
equation M6
(2)
equation M7
(3)
equation M8
(4)
where equation M9 and dσ are creation and annihilation operators, respectively, of an electron in the quantum dot with spin σ. equation M10 and ai,σ are those at site i with spin σ in the leads and the reference arm of the ring. equation M11 is the number operator in the dot with spin σ. U is the charging energy in the dot.
We consider the Coulomb blockade regime with one electron in the dot, -ε0, ε0 + U [dbl greater-than sign] Γ, where Γ = ΓL + Γ is the level broadening. equation M12, with ν0 being the local density of states at the end of semi-infinite leads. We analyze the vicinity of the electron-hole symmetry of -ε0 ε0 + U.
We create an equivalent model to the Hamiltonian (1), following Ref. [19]. First, we diagonalize the Hamiltonian Hleads+ring for the outer region of the quantum dot. There are two eigenstates for a given wavenumber k; |ψk,→right angle bracket represents an incident wave from the left and partly reflected to the left and partly transmitted to the right, whereas |ψk,←right angle bracket represents an incident wave from the right and partly reflected to the right and partly transmitted to the left. Next, we perform a unitary transformation for these eigenstates
equation M13
where Ak and Bk are determined so that equation M14 with dot state |dright angle bracket. In consequence, mode |ψkright angle bracket is coupled to the dot via HT, whereas equation M15 is completely decoupled.
Neglecting the decoupled mode, we obtain the equivalent model in which a quantum dot is coupled to a single lead. In a wide-band limit, the Hamiltonian is written as
equation M16
(5)
with equation M17 and density of states in the lead
equation M18
(6)
Here, D0 is the half of the band width, kF is the Fermi wavenumber, Rb = 1 - Tb, and
equation M19
(7)
where α = 4ΓLΓR/(ΓL + ΓR)2 is the asymmetric factor for the tunnel couplings of quantum dot.
The AB interference effect is involved in the flux-dependent density of states in the lead, υ(εk) in Eq. (6). As schematically shown in Figure 1(b), υ(εk) oscillates with the period of εT, where εT = ħvF/L is the Thouless energy for the ballistic systems. We assume that εT [double less-than sign] D0.
Scaling analysis
We apply the two-stage scaling method to the reduced model. In the first stage, we consider the charge fluctuation at energies of D [dbl greater-than sign] |ε0|. In this region, the number of electrons in the quantum dot is 0, 1, or 2. We reduce the energy scale from bandwidth D0 to D1 where the charge fluctuation is quenched. By integrating out the excitations in the energy range of D1 < D < D0, we renormalize the energy level in the quantum dot ε0. In the second stage of scaling, we consider the spin fluctuation at low energies of D < D1. We make the Kondo Hamiltonian and evaluate the Kondo temperature.
In the first stage, the charge fluctuation is taken into account. We denote E0, E1, and E2 for the energies of the empty state, singly occupied state, and doubly occupied state in the quantum dot, respectively. Then the energy levels in the quantum dot are given by ε0 = E1 - E0 for the first electron and ε1 = E2 - E1 for the second electron. When the bandwidth is reduced from D to D - |dD|, E0, E1, and E2 are renormalized to E0 + dE0, E1 + dE1, and E2 + dE2, where
equation M20
within the second-order perturbation with respect to tunnel coupling V. For D [dbl greater-than sign] |E1 - E0|, |E2 - E1|, they yield the scaling equations for the energy levels
equation M21
(8)
where i = 0, 1 and
equation M22
(9)
By the integration of the scaling equation from D0 to equation M23, we renormalize the energy levels in the quantum dot εi to equation M24:
equation M25
(10)
where
equation M26
Si(x) goes to 0 as x → 0 and π/2 as x → ∞.
From Equation 10, we conclude that
equation M27
(11)
when equation M28, and equation M29 when equation M30. These results can be rewritten in terms of length scale. We introduce equation M31, which corresponds to the screening length of charge fluctuation. When L [double less-than sign] Lc, the renormalized level equation M32 is given by Equation 11. When L [dbl greater-than sign] Lc, the energy level is hardly renormalized and is independent of ϕ.
In the second stage, we consider the spin fluctuation at low energies of D < D1. For the purpose, we make the Kondo Hamiltonian via the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation,
equation M33
(12)
equation M34
(13)
equation M35
(14)
where equation M36, equation M37 and equation M38 are the spin operators in the quantum dot. The density of states in the lead is given by Equation 6 and half of the band width is now equation M39. HJ represents the exchange coupling between spin 1/2 in the dot and spin of conduction electrons, whereas HK represents the potential scattering of the conduction electrons by the quantum dot. The coupling constants are given by
equation M40
By changing the bandwidth, we renormalize the coupling constants J and K so as not to change the low-energy physics within the second-order perturbation with respect to HJ and HK. Then we obtain the scaling equations of
equation M41
(15)
equation M42
(16)
The energy scale D where the fixed point (J → ∞) is reached yields the Kondo temperature.
Scaling equations (15) and (16) are analyzed in two extreme cases. In the case of D [dbl greater-than sign] εT, the oscillating part of the density of states ν(εk) is averaged out in the integration [22]. Then the scaling equations are effectively rewritten as
equation M43
(17)
equation M44
(18)
In the case of D [double less-than sign] εT, the expansion around the fixed point [23] yields
equation M45
(19)
equation M46
(20)
where ξ = D/TK - 1 and
equation M47
(21)
Now we evaluate the Kondo temperature in situations (i) Lc [double less-than sign] LK [double less-than sign] L, (ii) Lc [double less-than sign] L [double less-than sign] LK, and (iii) L [double less-than sign] Lc [double less-than sign] LK, where LK = νFħ/TK. In situation (i), εT [double less-than sign] TK and thus J and K follow Equations 17 and 18 until the scaling ends at D [similar, equals] TK. Integration of Equation 17 from D1 to TK yields
equation M48
(22)
where equation M49.
In situation (iii), D1 [double less-than sign] εT. Then the scaling equations (19) and (20) are valid in the whole scaling region (TK <D <D1). From the equations, we obtain
equation M50
(23)
where f(ϕ) = [1 - f(kFL + π/2, ϕ)]-1.
In situation (ii), TK [double less-than sign] εT [double less-than sign] D1. The coupling constants, J and K, are renormalized following Equations 17 and 18 when D is reduced from D1 to εT and following Equations 19 and 20 when D is reduced from εT to TK. We match the solutions of the respective equations around D = εT and obtain
equation M51
(24)
where γ ≈ 0.57721 is the Euler constant.
The different expressions of TK(ϕ) in the three situations can be explained intuitively. In situation (i), εT [double less-than sign] TK. Then the oscillating part of the density of states ν(εk) with period εT is averaged out in the scaling procedure (Figure (Figure2a).2a). As a result, the magnetic-flux dependence of TK disappears. In situation (iii), TK [double less-than sign] εT. Then ν(εk) is almost constant in the scaling (Figure (Figure2c).2c). The Kondo temperature significantly depends on the magnetic flux through the constant value of ν(0) at the Fermi level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic drawing of the density of states in the lead for the reduced model, in situations (a) Lc [double less-than sign] LK [double less-than sign] L, (b) Lc [double less-than sign] L [double less-than sign] LK, and (c) L [double less-than sign] Lc [double less-than sign] LK, where L is the size of the AB ring, Lc is the screening (more ...)
We have theoretically studied the Kondo effect in a quantum dot embedded in an AB ring. The two-stage scaling method yields an analytical expression of the Kondo temperature TK as a function of AB phase ϕ of the magnetic flux penetrating the ring. We have obtained different expressions of TK(ϕ) for (i) Lc [double less-than sign] LK [double less-than sign] L, (ii) Lc [double less-than sign] L [double less-than sign] LK, and (iii) L [double less-than sign] Lc [double less-than sign] LK, where L is the size of the ring, equation M52 is the screening length of the charge fluctuation, and LK = ħνF/TK is the screening length of the charge fluctuation, i.e., size of Kondo screening cloud. TK strongly depends on ϕ in cases (ii) and (iii), whereas it hardly depends on ϕ in case (i).
Abbreviation
AB: Aharonov-Bohm.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
This study was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and by Global COE Program "High-Level Global Cooperation for Leading-Edge Platform on Access Space (C12)."
  • Goldhaber-Gordon D, Shtrikman H, Mahalu D, Abusch-Magder D, Meirav U, Kastner MA. Kondo effect in a single-electron transistor. Nature. 1998;391:156. doi: 10.1038/34373. [Cross Ref]
  • Cronenwett SM, Oosterkamp TH, Kouwenhoven LP. A tunable Kondo effect in quantum dots. Science. 1998;281:540. [PubMed]
  • van der Wiel WG, De Franceschi S, Fujisawa T, Elzerman JM, Tarucha S, Kouwenhoven LP. Science. 2000. p. 2105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sasaki S, De Franceschi S, Elzerman JM, van der Wiel WG, Eto M, Tarucha S, Kouwenhoven LP. Kondo effect in an integer-spin quantum dot. Nature. 2000;405:764. doi: 10.1038/35015509. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sasaki S, Amaha S, Asakawa N, Eto M, Tarucha S. Enhanced Kondo effect via tuned orbital degeneracy in a spin 1/2 artificial atom. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;93:17205.
  • Aono T, Eto M, Kawamura K. Conductance through quantum dot dimer below the Kondo temperature. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1998;67:1860. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.67.1860. [Cross Ref]
  • Jeong H, Chang AM, Melloch MR. The Kondo effect in an artificial quantum dot molecule. Science. 2001;293:2221. doi: 10.1126/science.1063182. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Affleck I, Simon P. Detecting the Kondo screening cloud around a quantum dot. it Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:432. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.432. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Affleck I, Borda L, Saleur H. Friedel oscillations and the Kondo screening cloud. Phys Rev B. 2008;77:180404(R).
  • Borda L. Kondo screening cloud in a one-dimensional wire: Numerical renormalization group study. Phys Rev B. 2008;75:041307(R).
  • Holzner A, McCulloch I, Schollwock U, Delft J, Heidrich-Meisner F. Kondo screening cloud in the single-impurity Anderson model: A density matrix renormalization group study. Phys Rev B. 2009;80:205114.
  • Bulka BR, Stefański P. Fano and Kondo resonance in electronic current through nanodevices. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:5128. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5128. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hofstetter W, König J, Schoeller H. Kondo Correlations and the Fano Effect in Closed Aharonov-Bohm Interferometers. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:156803. [PubMed]
  • Konik RM. Kondo-Fano resonances in quantum dots; results from the Bethe ansatz. J Stat Mech: Theor Exp. 2004;2004:L11001. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/11/L11001. [Cross Ref]
  • Maruyama I, Shibata N, Ueda K. Theory of Fano-Kondo effect of transport properties through quantum dots. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2004;73:3239. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.73.3239. [Cross Ref]
  • Katsumoto S, Aikawa H, Eto M, Iye Y. Tunable Fano]Kondo effect in a quantum dot with an Aharonov]Bohmring. Phys Status Solidi C. 2006;3:4208. doi: 10.1002/pssc.200672880. [Cross Ref]
  • Simon P, Affleck I. Finite-size effects in conductance measurements on quantum dots. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89:206602. [PubMed]
  • Simon P, Entin-Wohlman O, Aharony A. Flux-dependent Kondo temperature in an Aharonov-Bohm interferometer with an in-line quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2005;72:245313.
  • Yoshii R, Eto M. Scaling Analysis for Kondo Effect in Quantum Dot Embedded in Aharonov-Bohm Ring. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2008;77:123714. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.77.123714. [Cross Ref]
  • Anderson PW. A poor man's derivation of scaling laws for the Kondo problem. J Phys C. 1970;3:2439.
  • Haldane FDM. Scaling theory of the asymmetric Anderson model. Phys Rev Lett. 1978;40:416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.416. [Cross Ref]
  • Yoshii R, Eto M. Scaling analysis of Kondo screening cloud in a mesoscopic ring with an embedded quantum dot. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:165310.
  • Eto M. Enhancement of Kondo Effect in Multilevel Quantum Dots. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2005;74:95. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.74.95. [Cross Ref]
Articles from Nanoscale Research Letters are provided here courtesy of
Springer