Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 December 9.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3248804

Regulation of miR-200c by Nuclear Receptors PPARα, LRH-1 and SHP


We investigated regulation of miR-200c expression by nuclear receptors. Ectopic expression of miR-200c inhibited MHCC97H cell migration, which was abrogated by the synergistic effects of PPARα and LRH-1 siRNAs. The expression of miR-200c was decreased by PPARα/LRH-1 siRNAs and increased by SHP siRNAs, and overexpression of the receptors reversed the effects of their respective siRNAs. SHP siRNAs also drastically enhanced the ability of the LRH-1 agonist RJW100 to induce miR-200c and downregulate ZEB1 and ZEB2 proteins. Co-expression of PPARα and LRH-1 moderately transactivated the miR-200c promoter, which was repressed by SHP co-expression. RJW100 caused strong activation of the miR-200c promoter. This is the first report to demonstrate that miR-200c expression is controlled by nuclear receptors.

Keywords: nuclear receptor, microRNA, transcription, cell migration

1. Introduction

MicroRNA-200c was initially identified in the lung [1]. Its functional association with cancer invasion resulted from a study showing that overexpressing miR-200c downregulated TCF8 but increased E-cadherin expression in non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancer cells [2]. Further studies demonstrated that miR-200c was downregulated in cells that had undergone epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and that miR-200c regulated EMT by targeting ZEB1, SIP1 and class III beta-tubulin (TUBB3) [3; 4; 5]. Thus, the loss of miR-200c expression was associated with an invasive cancer phenotype [6]. Subsequent studies observed miR-200c overexpression in human colon cancer [7], ovarian cancer [8], and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas [9]. Interestingly, miR-200c expression was downregulated in renal cell carcinoma [10]. miR-200c also sensitized cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis by targeting FAP-1 [11]. Downregulation of miR-200c was found in breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) and ectopic expression of miR-200c inhibited tumor formation by BCSCs [12]. Overall, miR-200c appears to be decreased in some cancers and increased in others.

Despite its important function in cancer invasion, how the transcription of miR-200c is regulated remains largely unknown. ZEB1 was shown to repress miR-200c expression in a negative feedback loop [13]. Silencing of miR-200c by DNA methylation [14] correlated with the invasive capacity of human breast cancer cell lines [15] and bladder cancer [16]. This study for the first time investigated transcriptional control of miR-200c expression and function by nuclear receptors in liver cancer cells.

2. Materials and methods

2.1.Plasmids, siRNAs and antibodies

PPARα expression plasmid and adenovirus were provided by Drs. Thurl Harris [17] and Clay Semenkovish [18], respectively. Antibodies to LRH-1 (ab18293), PPARα (ab2779), ZEB1 (ab64098), and ZEB2 (ab25837) were purchased from Abcam. Western blots were performed following standard procedures [19; 20]. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) for PPARα (SASI_Mm02_00319988) and non-specific RNAi (SIC001) were purchased from Sigma. SiRNAs for SHP (ONTARGETplus SMARTpool NR0B2, L-003410) and LRH-1 (NR5A2 ONTARGET plus SMART pool [L-003430-00-0005] were purchased from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon RNAi Technologies.

2.2. Cell migration assays

MHCC 97H cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and miR-200c for 6 hr. The cells were then serum starved for 24 hr and 5×104 cells were seeded on Transwell inserts (8 µm pore size; culterx 96 well cell migration assay, cat#3465-095-K). Cells were allowed to migrate for 16 hr, and the non-migratory cells were removed from insert with a cotton swab. The migrated cells were fixed for 10 min (3.7% v/v formaldehyde in PBS) before staining with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min, followed by washing with PBS. Pictures were taken by Microfire/Qcam CCD Olympus 1×81 microscope. Crystal violet stained cells were lysed with 1%SDS for 30 min and absorbance was measured at 595 nm.

2.3. Analysis of miRNA expression in agonist treated cells

Huh7 cells were grown to 60–70% confluence and treated with 25 µM of GW7647 (Sigma) or RJW100 [21; 22] for 24 hr. Cells treated with ethanol served as negative control. Total RNAs including miRNAs were isolated from cells using a miRNeasy mini kit and reverse transcribed using a miRNA reverse transcription kit. miR-200c levels were quantified by qPCR using miRNA primer assays Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). All the kits were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. U6 transcript was used as an internal control to normalize RNA input.

2.4. Transient transfection and luciferase assays

The luciferase reporters containing upstream fragments (~1 kb, 2 kb, and 3 kb) of pri-miR-200c (hmiR-200c Luc) were engineered in our laboratory. Dr. Muneesh Tewari provided us a 0.9 kb hmiR-200c promoter reporter [23], which was used as a control. In brief, human hepatoma Huh7 cells were transfected with the plasmids as indicated in the figure legends. Transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Luciferase activities were measured and normalized against Renilla activities (Promega). Consistent results were observed in three independent triplicate transfection assays.

2.5. Statistical analysis

All the experiments were repeated at least three times, and the error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were carried out using Student’s unpaired t test; p < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Knockdown of PPARα and LRH-1 antagonizes miR-200c inhibition of HCC cell migration

Because putative DNA binding elements for peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARα) and liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1) were predicted in the has-miR-200c promoter, we first examined the functional association between miR-200c and PPARα/LRH-1. Cell migration assays were performed using liver cancer MHCC97H cells that have a high invasive potential. Overexpression of miR-200c markedly inhibited MHCC97H cell migration, and the effect of miR-200c was abrogated by its inhibitor (Fig. 1A–1B). Knockdown of endogenous PPARα or LRH-1 (Fig. 1C) using their respective siRNAs did not alter the basal rate of cell migration but did reverse the inhibitory effect of miR-200c. Co-knockdown of PPARα and LRH-1 dramatically stimulated basal cell migration as well as antagonized the ability of miR-200c to inhibit MHCC97H cell migration. The results suggest that PPARα and LRH-1 may act synergistically to repress cell migration that is mediated by miR-200c.

Fig. 1
Effects of siRNA knockdown of PPARα and LRH-1 on MHCC97H cell migration mediated by miR-200c

3.2.The expression of miR-200c is activated by PPARα and LRH-1 and inhibited by SHP

Small heterodimer partner (SHP) is a transcriptional repressor that interacts with PPARα and LRH-1 [24]. Single or combinational knockdown or overexpression of PPARα, LRH-1, and SHP were utilized to assess regulation of miR-200c expression by these receptors. Huh7 cells express all three receptors and were thus used for knockdown experiments.

Knockdown of PPARα alone did not decrease miR-200c (Fig. 2A, #2 vs. 1), whereas overexpression of PPARα induced miR-200c expression (#3 vs. 1). LRH-1 siRNAs reduced miR-200c expression (#4 vs. 1), and overexpression of LRH-1 counteracted this effect (#5 vs. 4). Co-transfection of siRNAs against both PPARα and LRH-1 exhibited a more dramatic effect in downregulating miR-200c (#6 vs. 2&4), and the effect was reversed by co-expression of both receptors (#7 vs. 6). Knockdown of SHP upregulated miR-200c (#8 vs. 1), which was reversed by SHP overexpression (#9 vs. 8). SHP siRNAs also antagonized single or combinational effects of siPPARα and siLRH-1 in inhibiting miR-200c expression (#10, 11&12 vs. 2, 4&6). Interestingly, miR-200c expression was moderately induced by the LRH-1 agonist RJW100 (#15 vs.13), but not by the PPARα agonist GW7647 (#14 vs. 13), and siSHP further enhanced the effect of RJW100 (#18 vs. 15). The overexpression and knockdown of PPARα and LRH-1 proteins is presented in Fig. 2B. Overall, the results suggest that SHP is able to repress miR-200c expression by counteracting the effects of PPARα and LRH-1.

Fig. 2
Induction of miR-200c expression by PPARα and LRH-1 and inhibition by SHP

We also analyzed protein levels of the miR-200c target genes ZEB1 and ZEB2. ZEB1 and ZEB2 proteins were markedly downregulated by RJW/siSHP, but not by GW/siSHP (Fig. 2C). The data suggest that the RJW/siSHP combination could be useful in targeting ZEB1/ZEB2 in cancer intervention, which will be explored in future studies.

3.3. The promoter activity of miR-200c is inhibited by SHP via PPARα and LRH-1

Several putative PPARα binding sites (PPRE) and LRH-1 biding sites (LRE) were predicated within a 3 kb genomic region upstream of pre-hsa-miR-200c. We cloned luciferase reporters containing upstream fragments (~1 kb, 2 kb, and 3 kb) of pri-miR-200c. Strong activation of hmiR-200c promoters by individual expression of PPARα/RXRα or LRH-1 was not observed. A half PPRE site overlapped with a LRE (−835 nt ~ −816 nt) in the 1 kb miR-200c promoter, suggesting that both receptors may be required to bind to the same response elements. Indeed, co-expression of PPARα/RXRα and LRH-1 was able to activate the promoter (Fig. 3A, lane 4 vs. 1), although the activation appeared to be moderate. Nonetheless, EID1 (a known repressor of nuclear receptor) [25] or SHP decreased the reporter activity to basal levels (lane 5 & 6 vs. 4). Surprisingly, the LRH-1 agonist RJW100, but not PPARα agonist GW7647, strongly induced hmiR-200 promoter activity in Huh7 cells (Fig. 3B). A more dramatic effect of RJW100 was observed in Hela cells (not shown). The results suggest that a weak response element for PPARα and/or LRH-1 may exist in this promoter region.

Fig. 3
Promoter activation of miR-200c by PPARα and LRH-1 and inhibition by SHP

4. Discussion

Our recent studies identified SHP as a transcriptional repressor of miR-433 and miR-127 expression through inhibition of the activity of ERRγ [26; 27]. PPARα also exhibited a moderate activation of the miR-433 promoter [26]. The present study suggests that SHP represses miR-200c expression, at least in part, by inhibiting the activity of PPARα and LRH-1. Thus, SHP may inhibit the expression of miRNAs through common interacting partners and regulatory pathways.

Although functional and expression studies demonstrate that PPARα and LRH-1 are both activators of miR-200c, results from promoter studies are rather disappointing. One possibility is weak binding of PPARα and LRH-1 to the several non-consensus PPRE and LRE predicted within the 3 kb miR-200c promoter. Therefore the presence of both receptors is necessary for the activation of miR-200c promoter. The other possibility is that the upstream region of pre-miR-200c that we studied may not serve as the endogenous miR-200c promoter. At present, the transcriptional start site (TSS) of the full length primary miR-200c transcript remains unclear, and its identification may be necessary to resolve the role of nuclear receptors in activation of the miR-200c promoter.

Several studies have reported indirect regulation of miRNA expression by nuclear receptor antagonists or agonists [28; 29; 30]. It is worth noting that the expression of miR-200c can be induced by the pharmacologically active compound for LRH-1. This is of particular importance concerning the critical function of LRH-1 in metabolic diseases. It is plausible that miR-200c may play a role in metabolic regulation. On the other hand, despite the important function of miR-200c in tumor invasion, no report has identified synthetic agonists to activate miR-200c. Our study may provide a means to design such compounds to target miR-200c for cancer therapeutic applications.


  • Knockdown of PPARα and LRH-1 abolishes miR-200c inhibition of HCC cell migration
  • SHP represses miR-200c expression via inhibition of the activity of PPARα and LRH-1
  • RJW100 exhibits strong ability to downregulate ZEB1 and ZEB2 proteins


We are very grateful to Drs. Thurl Harris (University of Virginia), Clay Semenkovish (Washington University), and Muneesh Tewari (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center) for generously providing the plasmids and adenoviruses. Y.Z. is supported by NIH T32CA092347 Multidisciplinary Cancer Research Training Program (MCRTP). This work is in part supported by National Institutes of Health DK080440 to L.W.


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


1. Wang Y, Weng T, Gou D, Chen Z, Chintagari NR, Liu L. Identification of rat lung-specific microRNAs by micoRNA microarray: valuable discoveries for the facilitation of lung research. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Hurteau GJ, Carlson JA, Spivack SD, Brock GJ. Overexpression of the microRNA hsa-miR-200c leads to reduced expression of transcription factor 8 and increased expression of E-cadherin. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7972–7976. [PubMed]
3. Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, Vadas MA, Khew-Goodall Y, Goodall GJ. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:593–601. [PubMed]
4. Burk U, Schubert J, Wellner U, Schmalhofer O, Vincan E, Spaderna S, Brabletz T. A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:582–589. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Cochrane DR, Spoelstra NS, Howe EN, Nordeen SK, Richer JK. MicroRNA-200c mitigates invasiveness and restores sensitivity to microtubule-targeting chemotherapeutic agents. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 [PubMed]
6. Ceppi P, Mudduluru G, Kumarswamy R, Rapa I, Scagliotti GV, Papotti M, Allgayer H. Loss of miR-200c expression induces an aggressive, invasive, and chemoresistant phenotype in non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 8:1207–1216. [PubMed]
7. Xi Y, Formentini A, Chien M, Weir DB, Russo JJ, Ju J, Kornmann M, Ju J. Prognostic Values of microRNAs in Colorectal Cancer. Biomark Insights. 2006;2:113–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Iorio MV, Visone R, Di Leva G, Donati V, Petrocca F, Casalini P, Taccioli C, Volinia S, Liu CG, Alder H, Calin GA, Menard S, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8699–8707. [PubMed]
9. Mees ST, Mardin WA, Wendel C, Baeumer N, Willscher E, Senninger N, Schleicher C, Colombo-Benkmann M, Haier J. EP300--a miRNA-regulated metastasis suppressor gene in ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Int J Cancer. 126:114–124. [PubMed]
10. Nakada C, Matsuura K, Tsukamoto Y, Tanigawa M, Yoshimoto T, Narimatsu T, Nguyen LT, Hijiya N, Uchida T, Sato F, Mimata H, Seto M, Moriyama M. Genomewide microRNA expression profiling in renal cell carcinoma: significant down-regulation of miR-141 and miR-200c. J Pathol. 2008;216:418–427. [PubMed]
11. Schickel R, Park SM, Murmann AE, Peter ME. miR-200c regulates induction of apoptosis through CD95 by targeting FAP-1. Mol Cell. 38:908–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Shimono Y, Zabala M, Cho RW, Lobo N, Dalerba P, Qian D, Diehn M, Liu H, Panula SP, Chiao E, Dirbas FM, Somlo G, Pera RA, Lao K, Clarke MF. Downregulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell. 2009;138:592–603. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Wellner U, Schubert J, Burk UC, Schmalhofer O, Zhu F, Sonntag A, Waldvogel B, Vannier C, Darling D, zur Hausen A, Brunton VG, Morton J, Sansom O, Schuler J, Stemmler MP, Herzberger C, Hopt U, Keck T, Brabletz S, Brabletz T. The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1487–1495. [PubMed]
14. Vrba L, Jensen TJ, Garbe JC, Heimark RL, Cress AE, Dickinson S, Stampfer MR, Futscher BW. Role for DNA methylation in the regulation of miR-200c and miR-141 expression in normal and cancer cells. PLoS One. 5:e8697. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Neves R, Scheel C, Weinhold S, Honisch E, Iwaniuk KM, Trompeter HI, Niederacher D, Wernet P, Santourlidis S, Uhrberg M. Role of DNA methylation in miR-200c/141 cluster silencing in invasive breast cancer cells. BMC Res Notes. 3:219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Wiklund ED, Bramsen JB, Hulf T, Dyrskjot L, Ramanathan R, Hansen TB, Villadsen SB, Gao S, Ostenfeld MS, Borre M, Peter ME, Orntoft TF, Kjems J, Clark SJ. Coordinated epigenetic repression of the miR-200 family and miR-205 in invasive bladder cancer. Int J Cancer [PubMed]
17. Kim HB, Kumar A, Wang L, Liu GH, Keller SR, Lawrence JC, Jr., Finck BN, Harris TE. Lipin 1 represses NFATc4 transcriptional activity in adipocytes to inhibit secretion of inflammatory factors. Mol Cell Biol. 30:3126–3139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Chakravarthy MV, Lodhi IJ, Yin L, Malapaka RR, Xu HE, Turk J, Semenkovich CF. Identification of a physiologically relevant endogenous ligand for PPARalpha in liver. Cell. 2009;138:476–488. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Zhang Y, Soto J, Park K, Viswanath G, Kuwada S, Abel ED, Wang L. Nuclear receptor SHP, a death receptor that targets mitochondria, induces apoptosis and inhibits tumor growth. Mol Cell Biol [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Song G, Zhang Y, Wang L. MicroRNA-206 targets notch3, activates apoptosis, and inhibits tumor cell migration and focus formation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:31921–31927. [PubMed]
21. Whitby RJ, Dixon S, Maloney PR, Delerive P, Goodwin BJ, Parks DJ, Willson TM. Identification of small molecule agonists of the orphan nuclear receptors liver receptor homolog-1 and steroidogenic factor-1. J Med Chem. 2006;49:6652–6655. [PubMed]
22. Whitby RJ, Stec J, Blind RD, Dixon S, Leesnitzer LM, Orband-Miller LA, Williams SP, Willson TM, Xu R, Zuercher WJ, Cai F, Ingraham HA. Small molecule agonists of the orphan nuclear receptors steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, NR5A1) and liver receptor homologue-1 (LRH-1, NR5A2) J Med Chem. 54:2266–2281. [PubMed]
23. Bendoraite A, Knouf EC, Garg KS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, O'Briant KC, Ventura AP, Godwin AK, Karlan BY, Drescher CW, Urban N, Knudsen BS, Tewari M. Regulation of miR-200 family microRNAs and ZEB transcription factors in ovarian cancer: evidence supporting a mesothelial-to-epithelial transition. Gynecol Oncol. 116:117–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Zhang Y, Hagedorn CH, Wang L. Role of nuclear receptor SHP in metabolism and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Zhou T, Zhang Y, Macchiarulo A, Yang Z, Cellanetti M, Coto E, Xu P, Pellicciari R, Wang L. Novel polymorphisms of nuclear receptor SHP associated with functional and structural changes. J Biol Chem. 285:24871–24881. [PubMed]
26. Song G, Wang L. Transcriptional mechanism for the paired miR-433 and miR-127 genes by nuclear receptors SHP and ERRgamma. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5727–5735. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Song G, Wang L. A conserved gene structure and expression regulation of miR-433 and miR-127 in mammals. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7829. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Cao P, Deng Z, Wan M, Huang W, Cramer SD, Xu J, Lei M, Sui G. MicroRNA-101 negatively regulates Ezh2 and its expression is modulated by androgen receptor and HIF-1alpha/HIF-1beta. Mol Cancer. 9:108. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Yin KJ, Deng Z, Hamblin M, Xiang Y, Huang H, Zhang J, Jiang X, Wang Y, Chen YE. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta regulation of miR-15a in ischemia-induced cerebral vascular endothelial injury. J Neurosci. 30:6398–6408. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Weiss FU, Marques IJ, Woltering JM, Vlecken DH, Aghdassi A, Partecke LI, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM, Bagowski CP. Retinoic acid receptor antagonists inhibit miR-10a expression and block metastatic behavior of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:2136–2145. e1–7. [PubMed]