PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bioinorgchemapplJournal's HomeManuscript SubmissionAims and ScopeAuthor GuidelinesEditorial BoardHome
 
Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2011; 2011: 429241.
Published online Dec 14, 2011. doi:  10.1155/2011/429241
PMCID: PMC3246310
DNA Interaction Studies of a New Platinum(II) Complex Containing Different Aromatic Dinitrogen Ligands
Nahid Shahabadi, 1 * Somaye Mohammadi, 1 and Robabeh Alizadeh 2
1Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Razi University, Kermanshah 74155, Iran
2School of Chemistry, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran
*Nahid Shahabadi: nahidshahabadi/at/yahoo.com
Academic Editor: Zhe-Sheng Chen
Received July 20, 2011; Revised September 12, 2011; Accepted September 13, 2011.
A new mononuclear Pt(II) complex, [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2.H2O, in which DMP is 4,4-dimethyl-2,2-bipyridine and DIP is 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenantroline, has been synthesized and characterized by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods. The binding interaction of this complex with calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) was investigated using fluorimetry, spectrophotometry, circular dichroism, viscosimetry and cyclic voltametry (CV). UV-VIS spectrum showed 4 nm bathochromic shift of the absorption band at 280 nm along with significant hypochromicity for the absorption band of the complex. The intrnisic binding constant (Kb = 2 × 104 M−1) is more in keeping with intercalators and suggests this binding mode. The viscosity measurements showed that the complex-DNA interaction can be hydrophobic and confirm intercalation. Moreover, the complex induced detectable changes in the CD spectrum of CT-DNA. The fluorescence studies revealed that the probable quenching mechanism of fluorescence of the complex by CT-DNA is static quenching. The thermodynamic parameters (ΔH > 0 and ΔS > 0) showed that main interaction with hydrogenic forces occurred that is intercalation mode. Also, CV results confirm this mode because, with increasing the CT-DNA concentration, shift to higher potential was observed.
During the recent years, only some platinum compounds such as cisplatin, carboplatin, and more recently nedaplatin and oxaliplatin have been known as antitumor compounds in clinical treatments; the research in this field is still increasing [15]. The original studies of metallointercalators centered on square planar platinum(II) complexes containing phenanthroline ligand [6, 7]. Octahedral transition metal complexes containing three bipyridine or phenanthroline ligands have been shown to be groove binders or possible partial intercalators [8, 9]. Concerning the noncovalent interactions between transition metal complexes and DNA, they can occur by intercalation, groove binding, or external electrostatic binding [10]. In general, metal complexes upon binding to DNA are stabilized through a series of weak interactions such as the π-stacking interactions of aromatic heterocyclic groups between the base pairs (intercalation), hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals interactions of functional groups bound along the groove of the DNA helix [11]. Platinum compounds are an important part of the first line of treatment for many types of cancers such as testicular and ovarian cancer. Cisplatin, cis-[PtCl2(NH3)2], and carboplatin, Pt(cbca)(NH3)2 with cbca = 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate, has been in use clinically for more than 30 years. Recently, oxaliplatin, Pt(dach)(ox) where dach = R,R-1,2-diaminocycloexane and ox = oxalate, a third generation of Pt complexes have been approved for clinical use [12]. McFadyen et al. [13] synthesized a range of Pt(II) complexes containing substituted phenanthroline ligands and showed that the complex [Pt(en)(3,4,7,8-Me4phen)]Cl2 was two or three times more active than the corresponding phen-based complex [Pt(en)(phen)]Cl2, against murine leukemia cell lines. In this context, we report the results of an investigation of the interaction with calf thymus DNA of the complex [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O. The data were further compared with previous results [14] to determine the effect of metal on the DNA binding mode. Many techniques have been applied for investigation of the interaction of metal complexes with DNA. These include (i) molecular spectroscopy methods such as UV spectrophotometry [15], fluorescence [16], circular dichroism spectroscopy [17, 18], dynamic viscosity measurements [19, 20], and high-performance liquid chromatography [21]. Between these techniques, UV spectrophotometry, fluorescence method, dynamic viscosity measurements circular dichroism, and cyclic voltametry studies have been preferred because small molecule-DNA interaction may be experimentally monitored by changes in the intensity and position of the spectroscopic peak responses or changes in dynamic viscosity of DNA.
All chemicals such as K2PtCl4, 4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, and 4,4-dimethyl-2,2-bypyridine, were purchased from Merck, and Tris-HCl and highly polymerized calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) were purchased from Sigma Co.. Experiments were carried out in Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.0. A solution of calf thymus DNA gave a ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm more than 1.8, indicating that DNA was sufficiently free from protein [22]. The stock solution of CT-DNA was prepared by dissolving DNA in 10 mM of the Tris-HCl buffer at pH 7.0. The DNA concentration (monomer units) of the stock solution (1 × 10−2 M per nucleotide) was determined by UV spectrophotometer, in properly diluted samples, using the molar absorption coefficient 6600 M−1 cm−1 at 258 nm [23]. The stock solutions were stored at 4°C and used over no more than 4 days.
2.1. Synthesis of the [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O Complex
[Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O (Figure 1) was synthesized by two steps. In the first step the platinum precursor, K2PtCl4, the (0.05 g, 0.12 mmol) was dissolved in 6 mL of water and a solution of 4,4-dimethyl-2,2-bipyridine (0.022, 0.12 mmol) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred overnight at 50°C. A yellow precipitate was formed, which was filtered off and washed with ice-cold water and acetone. Subsequently in second step the prepared precipitate in first step (0.03 g, 0.1 mmol) was dissolved in 4 mL methanol and a solution of 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenantroline (0.027 g, 0.1 mmol) in 4 mL methanol was added dropwise. The last solution was refluxed in 180°C for 4 h. A green precipitate was formed, which was filtered off and washed with ice-cold water and diethylether. Yield: 36%. Elemental analysis for PtC36H28N4Cl2H2O: found: C, 53.2; H, 4.1; N, 6.9%; calc.: C, 54.1; H, 3.6; N, 7.0%; FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3050–3236 [ν (C–H)], 1230 [ν (C–N)], 1560 [ν (C=N)], 532 [ν (Pt–N)], 3400–3500 [ν (H2O)].
Figure 1
Figure 1
The structure of [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O complex.
2.2. Instrumentation
1H NMR spectra were recorded with using a Bruker Avance DPX200 MHz (4.7 T) spectrometer using d6-DMSO as solvent. The elemental analysis was performed using Heraeus CHN elemental analyzer. Absorbance spectra were recorded using a hp spectrophotometer (agilent 8453) equipped with a thermostated bath (Huberpolysat cc1). Absorption titration experiments were carried out by keeping the concentration of DNA constant (5 × 10−5 M) while varying the complex concentration from 5 × 10−5 M to 4 × 10−4 M (ri = [DNA]/[complex] = 0–4).
Absorbance values were recorded after each successive addition of DNA solution and equilibration (ca. 10 min) (Figure 2). The data were then fitted to (1) to obtain intrinsic binding constant, Kb [24]:
Figure 2
Figure 2
Absorption spectra of DNA (5 × 10−5 M) in the absence and in the presence of increasing amounts of platinum complex (ri = [DNA]/[complex]).
equation M1
(1)
where εa, εf, and εb are the apparent, free and bound complex extinction coefficients, respectively. In particular, εf was determined by a calibration curve of the isolated metal complex in aqueous solution; following the Beer's law, εa was determined as the ratio between the measured absorbance and the Pt(II) complex concentration, Aobs/[Pt]. A plot of [DNA]/(εaεf) versus [DNA] gave a slope of 1/(εbεf) and a Y intercept equal to 1/Kb(εbεf); Kb is the ratio of the slope to the Y intercept. CD measurements were recorded on a JASCO (J-810) spectropolarimeter, keeping the concentration of DNA constant (5 × 10−5 M) while varying the complex concentration (ri = [complex]/[DNA] = ri = 0, 0.4, 0.5).
Viscosity measurements were made using a viscosimeter (SCHOT AVS 450) maintained at 25.0 ± 0.5°C using a constant temperature bath. The DNA concentration was fixed at 5 × 10−5 M, and flow time was measured with a digital stopwatch. The mean values of three measurements were used to evaluate the viscosity η of the samples. The values for relative specific viscosity (η/η0)1/3, where η0 and η are the specific viscosity contributions of DNA in the absence (η0) and in the presence of the complex (η), were plotted against ri (ri =[complex]/[DNA] = 0.0–2.5).
All fluorescence measurements were carried out with a JASCO spectrofluorometer (FP6200) by keeping the concentration of complex constant while varying the DNA concentration from 0 to 36 × 10−5 M (ri = [DNA]/[complex] = 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 3, 3.5) at three different temperatures (288, 298, 308 K).
The cyclic voltammetric measurements were performed using an AUTOLAB model (PG STAT C), with a three-electrode system: a 0.10 cm diameter glassy carbon (GC) disc as working electrode, an Ag/AgCl electrode as reference electrode, and a Pt wire as counter electrode. Electrochemical experiments were carried out in a 25-mL voltammetric cell at room temperature. All potentials are referred to the Ag/AgCl reference. Their surfaces were freshly polished with 0.05 mm alumina prior to each experiment and were rinsed using double-distilled water between each polishing step. The supporting electrolyte was 0.01 M of Tris-HCl buffer solution (pH 7.4) which was prepared with double-distilled water. Before experiments, the solution was deaerated via purging with pure nitrogen gas for 1 min, and, during measurements a stream of nitrogen was passed over the solution. The current-potential curves and experimental data were recorded on software GPES [25].
3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O Complex
The mixed ligand platinum(II) complex of 4,4-dimethyl-2,2-bipyridine (DMP) and 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenantroline (DIP) has been synthesized in aqueous methanol solution using K2PtCl4. The complex conforms to the formula [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O, determined on the basis of elemental analysis.
The IR spectrum of the complex was characterized by the appearance of a band at 532 cm−1 due to the [ν (Pt–N)]. The coordination of the nitrogen atoms is confirmed with the presence of this band. However, the broad band at 3400–3500 cm−1 is assigned to [ν(H2O)]. Other bands are at 3050–3236 [ν (C–H)], 1230 [ν (C–N)], and 1560 [ν (C=N)], respectively.
1H NMR (d6-DMSO)
In the aromatic region the signals at δ = 8.3, δ = 8.1 and δ = 7.1 ppm were assigned to protons of DMP ligands and the signals at δ = 8.9, δ = 7.6, δ = 7.5, and δ = 7.3 were assigned to the protons of DIP ligand. The protons of DMP and DIP ligands are seen to be shifted (−0.2 ppm) with corresponding free ligand and suggesting complexation.
3.2. UV-VIS Spectroscopy
Absorption spectroscopy is one of the most useful techniques to study the binding of any drug to DNA. The extent of hypochromism generally indicates the intercalative binding strength [26]. The hypochromicity characteristic of intercalation has usually been attributed to the interaction between the electronic states of the compound and those of the DNA bases [27], while the red shift has been associated with the decrease in the energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals after binding of the complex to DNA [28]. Hyperchromism has been observed for the interaction of many drugs with DNA [29]. The hyperchromic effect might be ascribed to external contact (electrostatic binding [30]) or to partial uncoiling of the helix structure of DNA, exposing more bases of the DNA [31]. We have observed 4 nm bathochromic shift of the absorption band at 280 nm along with significant hypochromicity for the absorption band of the complex. This observation gives a good evidence of the intercalation of Pt(II) complex through the stacking and interaction of the aromatic rings of the ligands and the base pairs of DNA [32]. Additionally, based on the absorbance values obtained in the spectroscopic titration, the [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O complex-DNA binding constant, Kb, was calculated as described in the experimental procedure. The value obtained for Kb was 2.0 ± 0.2 × 104 M−1. The values of Kb described in the literature for classical intercalators (ethidium-DNA 7 × 107 M−1 [33] and proflavin-DNA 4.1 × 105 M−1 [34]) are at least 30 or 20 orders of magnitude higher than that obtained for this Pt(II) complex. This result suggests that intercalation between the base pairs is not the main mode of interaction of the Pt(II) complex with DNA. In contrast, the value of Kb is ten orders of magnitude higher than the Kb values which were found for compounds with the mode of groove binding like Cr(II) complexes [35] or tris (1,10-phen) ruthenium(II) to DNA [36]. These results confirm that the Pt(II) complex strongly interact with DNA, and the Kb value obtained for this complex is of the same order of magnitude of that determined in analogues condition for ZnL+2 (Kb = 7.36 ± 0.01 × 104 M−1) which considered as an intercalating complex [37].
3.2.1. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
To establish in more detail whether binding of the complex brings about any significant conformational change of the DNA double helix, circular dichroism (CD) spectra of CT-DNA were recorded at increasing complex/CT-DNA ratios. The observed CD spectrum of natural calf thymus DNA consists of a positive band at 275 nm due to base stacking and a negative band at 245 nm due to helicity, which is characteristic of DNA in right-handed B form (Figure 3) [38]. The effect of the complex on the conformation of the secondary structure of DNA was studied by keeping the concentration of CT-DNA at 5 × 10−5 M while varying the concentration of complex in a buffer solution of 10 mM of Tris (ri = 0, 0.4, 0.5). The spectrum of the CT-DNA and those with the additives were monitored from 215 to 800 nm. As shown in Figure 3, the CD spectrum of DNA exhibits a positive absorption at 282 nm due to the base stacking and a negative band at 240 nm due to the helicity of B-DNA. In the presence of the platinum(II) complex, the intensity of the positive peak increased and the intensity of the negative peak decreased. The changes in the CD spectra in the presence of the complex show stabilization of the right-handed B form of CT-DNA (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Circular dichroism spectra of CT-DNA (5 × 10−5 M) in the presence of increasing amounts of Pt(II) complex at the following stoichiometric ratios (ri = [complex]/[DNA] = 0.0, 0.4, 0.5).
3.2.2. Viscosity Measurements
The viscosity measurements of CT-DNA are regarded as the least ambiguous and the most critical tests of a binding model in solution in the absence of crystallographic structural data. The values of relative specific viscosity (η/η0)1/3 (where η0 and η are the specific viscosity contributions of DNA in the absence and in the presence of the Pt complex, resp.) were plotted against 1/R (R = [DNA]/[complex]) (Figure 4). It is known that the groove binder like Hoechst 33258 does not cause an increase in the axial length of the DNA [39, 40] and, therefore, did not alter the relative viscosity. In contrast, cisplatin which is known to link DNA through covalent binding, shortening the axial length of the double helix [41], caused a decrease in the relative viscosity of the solution. Partial intercalators also reduce the axial length observed as a reduction in relative viscosity, whereas the classical organic intercalators such as ethidium bromide increased the axial length of the DNA, and it becomes more rigid [39, 40] resulting in an increase in the relative viscosity. Results confirm the sensitivity of viscosity measurements to the different modes of DNA binding. In this study, it was observed that increasing the platinum complex concentration leaded to an increase of the DNA viscosity. Thus, we may deduce that the [Pt(DMP)(DIP)]Cl2·H2O complex certainly is a DNA intercalator. Since the interaction of this platinum(II) complex with DNA can make DNA longer, we would expect that the relative viscosity of DNA increases with a slope between 0 and 0.94 (a value measured for ethidium bromide [42] if the intercalation of the Pt(II) complex was either only one interaction mode or much stronger than other interaction(s) (Figure 6). But, in this study, the relative viscosity of DNA increases with a slope of 0.38 (Figure 4) and it is reasonably believed that may be other interaction(s) between DNA and the Pt(II) complex occurred, and is reasonable for the decrease of the slope. In addition, it should be noted that the DNA binding constant measured for this Pt(II) complex is lower than those determined for ethidium bromide. Therefore, the greater increase in viscosity observed for ethidium bromide compared to the Pt(II) complex is likely due to the lower binding constant of the latter to DNA. These results clearly show the importance of using several techniques to ascertain intercalation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of increasing amounts of Pt(II) complex on the viscosity of CT-DNA (5 × 10−5 M) in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Van't Hoff plot for the interaction of the Pt(II) complex and CT-DNA at pH 7.2.
3.2.3. Fluorescence Studies
To further investigate the interaction mode between the complex and CT-DNA, fluorescence titration experiments was performed. The complex emits luminescence in Tris-HCl buffer with maximum wavelengths of about 386 nm. Figure 5 shows the emission spectra of the complex in the absence and presence of varying amounts of CT-DNA. In the emission spectra for the complex, with increasing CT-DNA concentration the emission intensity is decreased due to self-stacking of some free bases in the compound along the DNA surface [43]. Quenching can occur by different mechanisms, which are usually classified as dynamic and static quenching. Dynamic quenching refers to a process in which the fluorophore and the quencher come into contact during the transient existence of the exited state, while static quenching refers to fluorophore-quencher complex formation. In general, dynamic and static quenching can be distinguished by their differing dependence on temperature and excited state lifetime. Since in both cases the fluorescence intensity is related to the concentration of the quencher, the quenched fluorophore can serve as an indicator for the quenching agent [44].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Fluorescence spectra of Pt(II) complex in the several concentrations of CT-DNA.
Fluorescence quenching is described by the Stern-Volmer equation:
equation M2
(2)
where F0 and F represent the fluorescence intensities in the absence and in the presence of quencher, respectively. Kq is the fluorophore quenching rate constant, KSV is quenching constant, τ0 is the lifetime of the fluorophore in the absence of a quencher (τ0 = 10−8), and [Q] is the concentration of quencher [45]. The results in Table 1 indicate that the probable quenching mechanism of this complex by CT-DNA involves static quenching, because KSV decreases with increasing temperature [46].
Table 1
Table 1
The quenching constants of the Pt(II) complex by CT-DNA at different temperatures.
3.3. Binding Constant and the Number of Binding Sites
If it is assumed that there are similar and independent binding sites in the biomolecule, the binding constant (Kf) and the number of binding sites (n) can be determined according to the method described by Hu et al. [47], using the following equation:
equation M3
(3)
Here, F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities of the fluorophore in the absence and presence of different concentrations of CT-DNA, respectively. The values of Kf and n were found to be 1.14 × 105 M−1 and 1, respectively, (Table 2).
Table 2
Table 2
Binding constants (Kf) and number of binding sites (n) of the complex-DNA system.
3.3.1. Binding Mode between the Complex and DNA
According to the thermodynamic data, interpreted as follows, the model of interaction between a drug and biomolecule can be [48] (1) ΔH < 0 and ΔS < 0, hydrophobic forces; (2) ΔH > 0 and ΔS > 0, van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonds; (3) ΔH > 0 and ΔS < 0, electrostatic interactions [49]. In order to elucidate the interaction of our complex with DNA, the thermodynamic parameters were calculated. The plot of ln K versus 1/T (Figure 4; (4)) allows the determination of ΔH and ΔS. If the temperature does not vary significantly, the enthalpy change can be regarded as a constant. Based on the binding constants at different temperatures, the free energy change can be estimated (Table 3; (5)) by the following equations
Table 3
Table 3
Thermodynamic parameters for the binding of the Pt(II) complex to CT-DNA.
equation M4
(4)
equation M5
(5)
where K is the Stern-Volmer quenching constant at the corresponding temperatures and R is the gas constant. When we apply this analysis to the binding of the complex with CT-DNA, we find that ΔH > 0 and ΔS > 0. Therefore, van der Waals interactions are probably the main forces in the binding of the investigated complex to CT-DNA.
3.4. Electrochemical Behaviour of the Complex in the Absence and Presence of CT-DNA
Recently, the electrochemical techniques extensively were used as a simple and rapid method to study DNA interaction with different compounds. The electrochemical behaviour of platinum is well known and was strongly influenced by the electrode material. A well-defined and sensitive peak was observed from the solutions of the complex with a GC electrode rather than the Pt one. Therefore, a GC electrode was used in this investigation. When CT-DNA is added to a solution of the complex, both the anodic and cathodic peak current heights of the complex decreased in the same manner of increasing additions of DNA, (Figure 7). Also during DNA addition, the anodic peak potential (Epa), cathodic peak potential (Epc), and E1/2 (calculated as the average of Epc and Epa) all showed positive shifts. These positive shifts are considered as evidences for intercalation of the complex into the DNA, because this kind of interaction is due to hydrophobic interaction. From the other point of view, if a molecule binds electrostatically to the negatively charged deoxyribose-phosphate backbone of DNA, negative peak potential shifts should be detected. Therefore, the positive shift in the CV peak potentials of complex is indicative of intercalative binding mode of the complex with DNA [25].
Figure 7
Figure 7
Cyclic voltametry for the Pt (II) complex (10−3 mol/L) at the presence of different concentrations of DNA.
In this paper, we investigate synthesis and characterization of new platinum(II) complex, and binding with CT-DNA was studied. The results suggest that the complex binds to DNA via intercalation mode. Spectrophotometry showed 4 nm bathochromic shift of the absorption band at 280 nm along with significant hypochromicity for the absorption band of the complex. The intristic binding constant (Kb = 2 × 104 M−1) is more in keeping with intercalators and suggest this binding mode. The viscosity measurement showed that the complex-DNA interaction can be hydrophobic and confirm intercalation. Moreover, the complex induced detectable changes in the CD spectrum of CT-DNA. The fluorescence studies revealed that the probable quenching mechanism of fluorescence of the complex by CT-DNA is static quenching. The thermodynamic parameters (ΔH > 0 and ΔS > 0) showed that van der Waals interactions occurred that is intercalation mode. Also, CV results confirm this mode because, with increasing CT-DNA concentration, shift to higher potential was observed.
Acknowledgment
Financial support from the Razi University Research Center is gratefully acknowledged.
1. Jamieson ER, Lippard SJ. Structure, recognition, and processing of cisplatin-DNA adducts. Chemical Reviews. 1999;99(9):2467–2498. [PubMed]
2. Cummings SD. Platinum complexes of terpyridine: synthesis, structure and reactivity. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2009;253:p. 449.
3. Lippert B, editor. Cisplatin Chemistry and Biochemistry of a Leading Anticancer Compound. Zurich, Switzerland: Helvetica Chimica Acta/Wiley- VCH; 1999.
4. Reedijk J. Why does cisplatin reach guanine-N7 with competing S-donor ligands available in the cell? Chemical Reviews. 1999;99(9):2499–2510. [PubMed]
5. Natiley G, Coluccia M. Trans-platinum drugs with phosphines and amines as carrier ligands induce apoptosis in tumor cells resistant to cisplatin. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2001;383:p. 216. [PubMed]
6. Jannette KW, Lippard SJ, Vassiliades GA, Bauer WR. Metallointercalation Reagents. 2-Hydroxyethanethiolato(2,2′,2-terpyridine)-platinum(II) Monocation Binds Strongly to DNA By Intercalation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1974;71(10):3839–3843. [PubMed]
7. Barton JK, Lippard SJ. Cooperative binding of a platinum metallointercalation reagent to poly(A).poly(U) Biochemistry. 1979;18(12):2661–2668. [PubMed]
8. Zeglis BM, Pierre VC, Barton JK. Metallo-intercalators and metallo-insertors. Chemical Communications. 2007;44:4565–4579. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Liu XW, Li J, Li H, Zheng KC, Chao H, Ji LN. Synthesis, characterization, DNA-binding and photocleavage of complexes [Ru(phen)2(6-OH-dppz)]2+ and [Ru(phen)2(6- NO2-dppz)]2+ Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2005;99(12):2372–2380. [PubMed]
10. Howe-Grant M, Lippard SJ. Laser temperature-jump study of stacking in adenylic acid polymers. Biochemistry. 1979;18(26):5757–5762. [PubMed]
11. Pyle AM, Rehmann JP, Meshoyrer R, Kumar CV, Turro NJ, Barton JK. Mixed-ligand complexes of ruthenium(II): factors governing binding to DNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1989;111(8):3051–3058.
12. Wong E, Giandornenico CM. Current status of platinum-based antitumor drugs. Chemical Reviews. 1999;99(9):2451–2466. [PubMed]
13. McFadyen WD, Wakelin LPG, Roos IAG, Leopold VA. Activity of platinum(II) intercalating agents against murine leukemia L1210. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1985;28(8):1113–1116. [PubMed]
14. Metcalfe C, Thomas JA. Kinetically inert transition metal complexes that reversibly bind to DNA. Chemical Society Reviews. 2003;32(4):215–224. [PubMed]
15. Bonomo RP, Cucinotta V, Grasso G, Maccarrone G, Mastruzzo L. Stereoselectivity in the interaction between an oligodeoxynucleotide and dipeptides in the presence of the copper(II) ion. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 1998;70(1):1–6.
16. Mahadevan S, Palaniandavar M. Spectroscopic and voltammetric studies of copper (II) complexes of bis(pyrid-2-yl)-di/trithia ligands bound to calf thymus DNA. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 1997;254(2):291–302.
17. Mitsopoulou CA, Dagas CE, Makedonas C. Synthesis, characterization, DFT studies and DNA binding of mixed platinum (II) complexes containing quinoxaline and 1,2-dithiolate ligands. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2008;102(1):77–86. [PubMed]
18. Carcell M, Mazzo P, Pelizzi C, Zani F. Antimicrobial and genotoxic activity of 2,6-diacetylpyridine bis(acylhydrazones) and their complexes with some first transition series metal ions. X-ray crystal structure of a dinuclear copper(II) complex. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 1995;57:43–62. [PubMed]
19. Vaidyanathan VG, Nair BU. Oxidative cleavage of DNA by tridentate copper (II) complex. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2003;93(3-4):271–276. [PubMed]
20. Mitsopoulou CA, Dagas CE, Makedonas C. Characterization and DNA interaction of the Pt(II)(pq)(bdt) complex: a theoretical and experimental research. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2008;361(7):1973–1982.
21. Bahrami AR, Dickman MJ, Matin MM, et al. Use of fluorescent DNA-intercalating dyes in the analysis of DNA via ion-pair reversed-phase denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry. 2002;309(2):248–252. [PubMed]
22. Kennedy SD, Bryant RG. Manganese-deoxyribonucleic acid binding modes. Nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion results. Biophysical Journal. 1986;50(4):669–676. [PubMed]
23. Kashanian S, Gholivand MB, Ahmadi F, Taravati A, Colagar AH. DNA interaction with Al-N,N, N′-bis(salicylidene)2,2′-phenylendiamine complex. Spectrochimica Acta A. 2007;67(2):472–478. [PubMed]
24. Wolfe A, Shimer GH, Meehan T. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons physically intercalate into duplex regions of denatured DNA. Biochemistry. 1987;26(20):6392–6396. [PubMed]
25. Ni Y, Lin D, Kokot S. Synchronous fluorescence, UV-visible spectrophotometric, and voltammetric studies of the competitive interaction of bis(10-phenanthroline)copper(II) complex and neutral red with DNA. Analytical Biochemistry. 2006;352(2):231–242. [PubMed]
26. Barton JK, Dennenberg JJ, Chaires JB. Tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) enantiomer interactions with DNA: mode and specificity of binding. Biochemistry. 1993;32(10):2573–2584. [PubMed]
27. Wang BD, Yang ZY, Crewdson P, Wang DQ. Synthesis, crystal structure and DNA-binding studies of the Ln(III) complex with 6-hydroxychromone-3-carbaldehyde benzoyl hydrazone. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2007;101(10):1492–1504. [PubMed]
28. Arjmand F, Aziz M. Synthesis and characterization of dinuclear macrocyclic cobalt(II), copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes derived from 2,2,2′,2′-S,S[bis(bis-N,N-2-thiobenzimidazolyloxalato-1,2-ethane)]: DNA binding and cleavage studies. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2009;44(2):834–844. [PubMed]
29. Cox PJ, Psomas G, Bolos CA. Characterization and DNA-interaction studies of 1-dicyano-2,2-ethylene dithiolate Ni(II) mixed-ligand complexes with 2-amino-5-methyl thiazole, 2-amino-2-thiazoline and imidazole. Crystal structure of [Ni(i-MNT)(2a-5mt)2] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2009;17(16):6054–6062. [PubMed]
30. Pasternack RF, Gibbs EJ, Villafranca JJ. Interactions of porphyrins with nucleic acids. Biochemistry. 1983;22(10):2406–2414. [PubMed]
31. Pratviel G, Bernadou J, Meunier B. DNA and RNA cleavage by metal complexes. Advances in Inorganic Chemistry. 1998;45:251–312.
32. Uno T, Hamasaki K, Tanigawa M, Shimabayashi S. Binding of meso-Tetrakis(N-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin to Double Helical RNA and DNA·RNA Hybrids. Inorganic Chemistry. 1997;36(8):1676–1683. [PubMed]
33. Waring MJ. Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1965;13(1):269–282. [PubMed]
34. Baba Y, Beathy CL, Kagemato A, Gebelien C. Biological Activity of Polymers. Vol. 186. Washington, DC, USA: American Chemical Society; 1962. (ACS Symposium Series).
35. Vijayalakshmi R, Kanthimathi M, Subramanian V, Nair BU. Interaction of DNA with [Cr(Schiff base)(H2O)2]ClO4. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2000;1475(2):157–162. [PubMed]
36. Eriksson M, Leijon M, Hirot C, Norden B, Graeslund A. Minor groove binding of [Ru(phen)3]2+ to [d(CGCGATCGCG)]2 evidenced by two-dimensional NMR. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1992;114:4933–4934.
37. Silvestri A, Barone G, Ruisi G, Anselmo D, Riela S, Liveri VT. The interaction of native DNA with Zn(II) and Cu(II) complexes of 5-triethyl ammonium methyl salicylidene orto-phenylendiimine. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2007;101(5):841–848. [PubMed]
38. Ramakrishnan S, Palaniandavar M. Interaction of rac-[Cu(diimine)3]2+ and rac-[Zn(diimine)3]2+ complexes with CT DNA: effect of fluxional Cu(II) geometry on DNA binding, ligand-promoted exciton coupling and prominent DNA cleavage. Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2005;117:179–186. [PubMed]
39. Long EC, Barton JK. On demonstrating DNA intercalation. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1990;23:271–273.
40. Suh D, Chaires JB. Criteria for the mode of binding of DNA binding agents. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 1995;3(6):723–728. [PubMed]
41. Kapicak L, Gabbay EJ. Topography of nucleic acid helixes in solutions. XXXIII. Effect of aromatic cations on the tertiary structures of deoxyribonucleic acid. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1975;97:403–408. [PubMed]
42. Li FH, Zhao GH, Wu HX, et al. Synthesis, characterization and biological activity of lanthanum(III) complexes containing 2-methylene-10-phenanthroline units bridged by aliphatic diamines. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2006;100(1):36–43. [PubMed]
43. Nyarko E, Hanada N, Habib A, Tabata M. Fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra of Au(III), Pt(II) and Pd(II) porphyrins with DNA at room temperature. Inorganica Chimica Acta. 2004;357(3):739–745.
44. Cui FL, Fan J, Li JP, Hu ZD. Interactions between 1-benzoyl-4-p-chlorophenyl thiosemicarbazide and serum albumin: investigation by fluorescence spectroscopy. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;12(1):151–157. [PubMed]
45. Sun Y, Bi S, Song D, Qiao C, Mu D, Zhang H. Study of interactions of anthraquinones with DNA using ethidium bromide as a fluorescence probe. Sensors and Actuators B. 2008;129:799–810. [PubMed]
46. Kandagal PB, Shaikh SMT, Manjunatha DH, Seetharamappa J, Nagaralli BS. Spectroscopic studies on the binding of bioactive phenothiazine compounds to human serum albumin. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A. 2007;189(1):121–127.
47. Hu YJ, Yu HG, Dong JX, Yang X, Liu Y. Spectroscopic studies on the interaction between 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic acid and bovine serum albumin. Spectrochimica Acta A. 2006;65(3-4):988–992. [PubMed]
48. Naik DB, Moorthy PN, Priyadarsini KI. Nonradiative energy transfer from 7-amino coumarin dyes to thiazine dyes in methanolic solutions. Chemical Physics Letters. 1990;168(6):533–538.
49. Shahabadi N, Fatahi A. Multispectroscopic DNA-binding studies of a tris-chelate nickel(II) complex containing 4,7-diphenyl 10-phenanthroline ligands. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2010;970(1–3):90–95.
Articles from Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications are provided here courtesy of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation