Although miR-150 was initially appreciated as a key miRNA in B cell development (
Zhou et al., 2007), it is becoming increasingly apparent that it also functions in other cell types of the hematopoietic system. miR-150 modulates lineage fate in megakaryocyte progenitors, driving differentiation of megakaryocytes at the expense of erythroid cells (
Lu et al., 2008). Overexpression of miR-150 in hematopoietic stem cells leads to a mild increase in granulocytes (
Zhou et al., 2007). In this study, we have demonstrated an important role for miR-150 in directing that development and maturation of the NK and the CD1d-restricted NKT cell lineages as well. In the absence of miR-150, peripheral numbers of NK cells are decreased; the cells appear to be halted at a stage before final maturation, and their ability to produce IFN-γ after activation is diminished. That miR-150 promotes NK cell development and maturation was corroborated in experiments in which miR-150 was ectopically expressed in BM. This led to an accumulation of more mature hyperfunctional NK cells. Furthermore, proper dosage of miR-150 is also necessary for the development and maturation of iNKT cells. Importantly, we find that miR-150 acts in a cell-intrinsic manner in both lineages. Because NK cells and iNKT cells come from different committed precursors and develop in different locations (
Di Santo, 2006;
Godfrey et al., 2010), miR-150 most likely acts independently in both cell types after lineage commitment. Given that miR-150 expression is low in the progenitor populations of each of these lineages compared with mature NK and iNKT cells, it is unlikely that it would regulate the formation of these committed precursors.
miR-150 effects in NK and iNKT cells are at least partially mediated by its target gene
Myb. Transcript levels of c-Myb and its target genes c-kit and Bcl2 are increased in miR-150
−/− NK cells. Partial ablation of c-Myb phenocopies increased NK cell frequency and impaired iNKT cell development observed in miR-150
Tg chimeric mice. It is possible that other miR-150 target genes may also contribute to the NK and iNKT cell developmental phenotypes observed in miR-150
−/− and miR-150
Tg chimeric mice. Bioinformatics analyses predict hundreds of target genes for each miRNA (
Rajewsky, 2006). Only a few of these, however, may represent targets with a significant biological function or be relevant in a particular cellular context. Pim-1, a predicted target of miR-150 (
Xiao et al., 2007), is known to stimulate c-Myb activity (
Leverson et al., 1998), indicating that miR-150 may suppress multiple genes in the c-Myb pathway. The expression pattern of Pim-1 mimics c-Myb, and is inversely correlated with that of miR-150 during NK cell activation (
Heng and Painter, 2008), suggesting that it might be functionally relevant for the regulation of NK cells. Recently, miR-150 was shown to target the transcription factor Egr2 (
Wu et al., 2010). Egr2 is an essential regulator of iNKT cell development and is thought to control iNKT cell proliferation and apoptosis (
Lazarevic et al., 2009). Interestingly, although expressed in developing NK cells (unpublished data), Erg2 is not necessary for NK cell development (
Lazarevic et al., 2009), suggesting that miR-150–mediated regulation of Eg2 levels might have functional consequences for iNKT but not NK cells. Furthermore, another miR-150 target, the purinergic P2X7 receptor (
L. Zhou et al., 2008), has been implicated in regulating iNKT cell activation (
Kawamura et al., 2006). Targeted mutagenesis of the miR-150–binding sites in the
Myb 3′UTR or a genetic rescue of miR-150
−/− phenotype by the partial loss of c-Myb will ultimately be required to determine to what extent contributions of target genes other than c-Myb might explain the phenotypes of NK and iNKT cell compartments.
Several transcription factors that regulate the development of NK cells have been described (
Hesslein and Lanier, 2011). Members of the Ets family of transcription factors control several aspects of hematopoiesis in general, and NK cell development in particular. PU.1 deficiency results in the generation of reduced numbers of NKP and mature NK cells (
Colucci et al., 2001), whereas deficiencies in Ets1 and MEF result in severe defects in the development of NK and iNKT cells (
Barton et al., 1998;
Walunas et al., 2000). T-bet, a member of the T-box family of transcription factors, controls various aspects of NK cells (
Hesslein and Lanier, 2011). Mice lacking T-bet have a profound, cell-intrinsic defect in their ability to generate mature NK and iNKT cells (
Townsend et al., 2004). Both cell lineages fail to complete maturation, leading to decreased numbers in the periphery. Bcl11b is a zinc finger protein that plays an essential role in specifying T cell fate by both up-regulating T cell–specific genes and suppressing NK cell genes (
Li et al., 2010). When Bcl11b was deleted, T cells acquired expression of NK cell lineage molecules including CD122, T-bet, NKp46, and NKG2A receptors, perforin, and IFN-γ after in vitro culture. Perhaps the accumulation of miR-150
Tg NK cells is a result of reprogrammed NK-like cells with altered Bcl11b expression? This scenario is unlikely as the mouse
Bcl11b gene does not contain the miR-150 seed sequence in its 3′ or 5′ UTR or its coding sequence (
Dweep et al.. 2011), and there is no evidence suggesting that Bcl11b mRNA levels are altered in miR-150 mutant NK cells (unpublished data). c-Myb has recently been shown to be required for the development and function of iNKT cells (
Hu et al., 2010). Further investigation of a role for c-Myb in NK cell development requires loss of c-Myb specifically in NK cell lineage. With the development of a NK cell–specific Cre mice (
Eckelhart et al., 2011), it will now be feasible to test the hypothesis that c-Myb is a negative regulator of NK cell development.
The factors that control Ly49 gene expression are beginning to be defined. We show here that miR-150 and c-Myb are required for the acquisition of the Ly49A receptor. Several scenarios are possible to explain the reduced frequency of Ly49A
+ NK cells in miR-150 transgenic and c-Myb heterozygous mice. First, miR-150 and c-Myb may be involved in the formation of Ly49 receptor repertoire at the level of its adaptation to the MHC class I environment. This is unlikely for Ly49A because Ly49A is not known to recognize the MHC class I H2
b allele in C57BL/6 mice (
Orr and Lanier, 2011), and our studies were conducted in mixed BM chimeras where both WT and mutant cells develop in the same environment. Alternatively, the reduced frequency of Ly49A
+ NK cells might result from differences within the CD27
+ CD11b
− and CD27
+ CD11b
− cell subsets between miR-150
Tg and
Myb+/− NK cells. To this end, we co-stained NK cells from different chimeric mice with anti-CD11b antibody and measured Ly49A expression. Both CD27
+ CD11b
− and CD27
− CD11b
+ subsets among miR-150
Tg NK cells showed a lower proportion of Ly49A
+ NK cells compared with WT cells; similar findings were observed in
Myb+/− chimeras (unpublished data). In a third possible scenario, a lack of transcription factors necessary for Ly49A expression could explain the reduction of Ly49A subset in miR-150
Tg and
Myb+/− NK cells. Gata-3 has been shown to be a direct target of c-Myb (
Maurice et al., 2007), and Gata-3 deficiency leads to a reduction of the Ly49A subset of NK cells (
Samson et al., 2003). Trans-acting factor transcription factor-1 has been shown to bind the
Klra1 promoter and regulate the Ly49A-bearing NK cell subset in a dosage-dependent manner (
Held et al., 1999). Putative binding sites for the transcription factors Runx1 and Atf2 have also been suggested to control Ly49A expression (
Kubo et al., 1999;
Kunz and Held, 2001), but at least in the case of Atf2, the Ly49 receptor repertoire analysis does not seem to indicate a requirement for this transcription factor for Ly49A expression (
Kim et al., 2006). Lastly, it is possible that c-Myb itself binds to and regulates the
Klra1. A c-Myb–binding sequence is found in the upstream region of
Klra1 (
Tanamachi et al., 2004), and we find that the size of the Ly49A-expressing NK cell subset is dependent on the dosage of c-Myb. Future studies in c-Myb–deficient NK cells will definitively prove whether c-Myb is necessary for the acquisition of Ly49A.
We find that miR-150 differentially affects the development of NK and iNKT cell lineages. The literature supports the notion that miR-150 plays different roles depending on cell context. Forced expression of miR-150 promoted proliferation of gastric cancer cells (
Wu et al., 2010), whereas it increased the rate of apoptosis and reduced proliferation of NK/T lymphoma cells (
Watanabe et al., 2011). miR-150
Tg mice have a reduced number of splenic B cells, and miR-150
Tg B cells from the BM showed increased sensitivity to apoptosis when cultured in vitro (
Xiao et al., 2007). In contrast, there was an accumulation of NK cells in miR-150
Tg chimeric mice and no difference was seen in the rate of apoptosis between WT and miR-150
Tg NK cells. The differences in susceptibility to apoptosis can be partially explained by the higher frequency of mature NK cells and greater percentage of immature B cells (
Xiao et al., 2007), but the maturation status alone is probably insufficient to explain the entire phenotype of miR-150
Tg NK cells. B cells depend on positive signaling through the B cell receptor to promote survival and terminal differentiation (
Meffre et al., 2001). B-1 B cells, which require strong BCR signaling to develop (
Hayakawa et al., 1999), are significantly reduced in miR-150
Tg mice (
Xiao et al., 2007). The opposite is true for NK cells, which rely on negative signaling through the inhibitory receptors to reach a mature, functionally competent state (
Fernandez et al., 2005;
Kim et al., 2005;
Anfossi et al., 2006). Future studies will examine how miR-150 effects the survival of iNKT cells. Whereas c-Myb is necessary for the survival of double-positive thymocytes (
Bender et al., 2004), ectopic expression of miR-150 did not significantly effect T cell development in the thymus (
Xiao et al., 2007;
Zhou et al., 2007). Another unexpected finding was the relatively unchanged number of miR-150
−/− iNKT cells. Perhaps developing iNKT cells are exquisitely sensitive to the dose of miR-150 and its regulated genes; too much miR-150 inhibits iNKT cell development, whereas lack of miR-150 also leads to a mild reduction. It is also possible that miR-150 might have both a negative and a positive role at different stages of iNKT cell development, depending on the expression of the target genes it regulates. This context-specific property may perhaps explain why miR-150 expression varies between different lineages and different developmental stages within the hematopoietic system (
Kuchen et al., 2010). In conclusion, this is the first study showing the requirement of a specific miRNA for the development and maturation of NK and iNKT cells.