HIV-1 has long been suspected to be of chimpanzee origin (
Gao et al. 1999); however, until recently, the perceived lack of a chimpanzee reservoir left the source of HIV-1 open to question. These uncertainties have since been resolved by noninvasive testing of wild-living ape populations. It is now well established that all naturally occurring SIVcpz strains fall into two subspecies-specific lineages, termed SIVcpz
Ptt and SIVcpz
Pts, respectively, that are restricted to the home ranges of their respective hosts (Figs. and ). Viruses from these two lineages are quite divergent, differing at about 30%–50% of sites in their Gag, Pol, and Env protein sequences (
Vanden Haesevelde et al. 1996). Interestingly, population genetic studies have shown that central and eastern chimpanzees are barely differentiated, calling into question their status as separate subspecies (
Fischer et al. 2006;
Gonder et al. 2011). However, the fact that they harbor distinct SIVcpz lineages suggests that central and eastern chimpanzees have been effectively isolated for some time. In addition, molecular epidemiological studies in southern Cameroon have shown that SIVcpz
Ptt strains show phylogeographic clustering, with viruses from particular areas forming monophyletic lineages, and the discovery of SIVgor has identified a second ape species as a potential reservoir for human infection (
Van Heuverswyn et al. 2006). Collectively, these findings have allowed the origins of HIV-1 to be unraveled (
Keele et al. 2006;
Van Heuverswyn et al. 2007).
HIV-1 is not just one virus, but comprises four distinct lineages, termed groups M, N, O, and P, each of which resulted from an independent cross-species transmission event. Group M was the first to be discovered and represents the pandemic form of HIV-1; it has infected millions of people worldwide and has been found in virtually every country on the globe. Group O was discovered in 1990 and is much less prevalent than group M (
De Leys et al. 1990;
Gurtler et al. 1994). It represents less than 1% of global HIV-1 infections, and is largely restricted to Cameroon, Gabon, and neighboring countries (
Mauclere et al. 1997;
Peeters et al. 1997). Group N was identified in 1998 (
Simon et al. 1998), and is even less prevalent than group O; so far, only 13 cases of group N infection have been documented, all in individuals from Cameroon (
Vallari et al. 2010). Finally, group P was discovered in 2009 in a Cameroonian woman living in France (
Plantier et al. 2009). Despite extensive screening, group P has thus far only been identified in one other person, also from Cameroon (
Vallari et al. 2011). Although members of all of these groups are capable of causing CD4
+ T-cell depletion and AIDS, they obviously differ vastly in their distribution within the human population.
depicts a phylogenetic tree of representative HIV-1, SIVcpz, and SIVgor strains. It shows that all four HIV-1 groups, as well as SIVgor, cluster with SIVcpz
Ptt from central chimpanzees, identifying this subspecies as the original reservoir of both human and gorilla infections. HIV-1 groups N and M are very closely related to SIVcpz
Ptt strains from southern Cameroon, indicating that they are of chimpanzee origin. It has even been possible to trace their ape precursors to particular
P. t. troglodytes communities. HIV-1 group N appears to have emerged in the vicinity of the Dja Forest in south-central Cameroon, whereas the pandemic form, group M, likely originated in an area flanked by the Boumba, Ngoko, and Sangha rivers in the southeastern corner of Cameroon (
Keele et al. 2006;
Van Heuverswyn et al. 2007). Existing phylogenetic data support a gorilla origin of HIV-1 group P, but too few SIVgor strains have been characterized to identify the region where this transmission might have occurred. In contrast, the immediate source of HIV-1 group O remains unknown, because there are no ape viruses that are particularly closely related to this group (). Thus, HIV-1 group O could either be of chimpanzee or gorilla origin. Nonetheless, the fact that group O and P viruses are more closely related to SIVcpz
Ptt than to SIVcpz
Pts suggests that both groups originated in west central Africa, which is consistent with their current distributions.
How humans acquired the ape precursors of HIV-1 groups M, N, O, and P is not known; however, based on the biology of these viruses, transmission must have occurred through cutaneous or mucous membrane exposure to infected ape blood and/or body fluids. Such exposures occur most commonly in the context of bushmeat hunting (
Peeters et al. 2002). Whatever the circumstances, it seems clear that human–ape encounters in west central Africa have resulted in four independent cross-species transmission events. Molecular clock analyses have dated the onset of the group M and O epidemics to the beginning of the twentieth century (
Korber et al. 2000;
Lemey et al. 2004;
Worobey et al. 2008). In contrast, groups N and P appear to have emerged more recently, although the sequence data for these rare groups are still too limited to draw definitive conclusions.
Eastern chimpanzees are endemically infected with SIVcpz
Pts throughout central Africa (A). Although prevalence rates have not been determined for all field sites, the
P. t. schweinfurthii communities that have been studied show infection rates that are very similar to those found in
P. t. troglodytes (
Keele et al. 2006,
2009;
Rudicell et al. 2010). Given that SIVcpz
Ptt strains have been transmitted to gorillas and humans on at least five occasions, it is striking that evidence of similar transmissions from eastern chimpanzees is lacking. There are a number of possible explanations. First, the risk of human exposure to SIVcpz
Pts may be lower, perhaps because of differences in the frequencies or types of human–ape interactions in central and east Africa. Second, SIVcpz
Pts infections of humans may have occurred, but gone unrecognized, because of limited human sampling and a lack of lineage-specific serological tests. Finally, as discussed below, SIVcpz
Ptt has evolved to overcome human restriction factors, such as tetherin, which may pose a barrier to cross-species transmission; because SIVcpz
Pts is highly divergent from SIVcpz
Ptt, viruses from this lineage may not have been able to adapt in the same way. Although SIVcpz
Ptt and SIVcpz
Pts strains replicate with similar kinetics in human CD4
+ T cells in vitro (
Takehisa et al. 2007), such cultures are unlikely to accurately recapitulate the conditions of viral replication and transmission in vivo.