Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 2, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3234102
Sustained firing of cartwheel cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus evokes endocannabinoid release and retrograde suppression of parallel fiber synapses
Miloslav Sedlacek,1 Philip W Tipton,1 and Stephan D Brenowitz1
1Section on Synaptic Transmission, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
Send correspondence to: Stephan Brenowitz, PhD, National Institutes of Health, Building 50/Room 4152, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, Phone: 301-496-6069, Fax: 301-496-0190, brenowitzs/at/
Neurons in many brain regions release endocannabinoids from their dendrites that act as retrograde signals to transiently suppress neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals. Little is known however about the physiological mechanisms of short-term endocannabinoid-mediated plasticity under physiological conditions. Here we investigate calcium-dependent endocannabinoid release from cartwheel cells (CWCs) of the mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) in the auditory brainstem that provide feedforward inhibition onto DCN principal neurons. We report that sustained action potential firing by CWCs evokes endocannabinoid release in response to submicromolar elevation of dendritic calcium that transiently suppresses their parallel fiber inputs by >70%. Basal spontaneous CWC firing rates are insufficient to evoke tonic suppression of PF synapses. However, elevating CWC firing rates by stimulation of parallel fibers triggers release of endocannabinoids and heterosynaptic suppression of PF inputs. Spike-evoked suppression by endocannabinoids selectively suppresses excitatory synapses but glycinergic/GABAergic inputs onto CWCs are not affected. Our findings demonstrate a mechanism of transient plasticity mediated by endocannabinoids that heterosynaptically suppresses subsets of excitatory presynaptic inputs to CWCs that regulates feedforward inhibition of DCN principal neurons and may thereby influence the output of the DCN.
Keywords: dorsal cochlear nucleus, cartwheel cell, endocannabinoids, synaptic plasticity, calcium imaging
In the mammalian brain, endocannabinoid signaling enables neurons to regulate the strength of their inputs in a retrograde manner (Wilson and Nicoll, 2002; Freund et al., 2003; Kano et al., 2009). Depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE) or inhibition (DSI) requires elevation of dendritic calcium and produces widespread release of endocannabinoids that activate presynaptic CB1 receptors, suppressing synaptic strength for tens of seconds (Kreitzer and Regehr, 2001; Ohno-Shosaku et al., 2001; Wilson and Nicoll, 2001). Calcium concentrations of several micromolar are required to evoke DSE and DSI (Wang and Zucker, 2001; Brenowitz and Regehr, 2003; Maejima et al., 2005) suggesting that this phenomenon may not ordinarily occur in healthy neurons. However, sustained firing of sodium spikes (Myoga et al., 2009) or burst firing (Brenowitz et al., 2006) can evoke endocannabinoid release with much lower elevations of calcium, suggesting that endocannabinoids may contribute to short-term synaptic plasticity under physiological conditions.
Endocannabinoid signaling contributes to short-term synaptic plasticity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) (Tzounopoulos et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2009). The DCN integrates auditory and non-auditory information and has been proposed to play a role in sound localization (Young and Davis, 2002; Oertel and Young, 2004) and filtering of self-generated noise (Shore and Zhou, 2006; Requarth and Sawtell, 2011). Inputs to DCN conveying somatosensory information originate in regions including the dorsal column nuclei (Wright and Ryugo, 1996), spinal trigeminal nucleus (Zhou and Shore, 2004) and trigeminal ganglion (Shore et al., 2000). These inputs excite auditory granule cells, whose parallel fiber (PF) axons form glutamatergic synapses onto fusiform cells, the principal neurons of the DCN, and cartwheel cells, glycinergic interneurons that inhibit fusiform cells. Through feedforward inhibition mediated by CWCs, somatosensory input to DCN suppress spontaneous firing (Davis et al., 1996) and modulate sound-evoked responses (Kanold et al., 2011; Koehler et al., 2011) of fusiform cells. CB1 receptors are expressed on presynaptic terminals of PFs, and depolarization of CWCs evokes DSE of PF EPSCs (Tzounopoulos et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2009). However, the calcium levels required for DSE is not known, and physiological mechanisms that contribute to endocannabinoid-mediated short-term plasticity at PF-CWC synapses are not well understood.
While CWCs exhibit molecular and physiological similarities to cerebellar Purkinje cells (Mugnaini et al., 1987; Berrebi et al., 1990; Zhang and Oertel, 1993; Manis et al., 1994), one difference is that CWCs express voltage-gated sodium channels in their dendrites. This enables backpropagating action potentials to evoke dendritic calcium transients (Molitor and Manis, 2003; Roberts et al., 2008) that could contribute to endocannabinoid release. Here we investigated the role of dendritic calcium in endocannabinoid-mediated short-term plasticity at synapses onto CWCs. We find that DSE has a high calcium requirement of several micromolar. However, sustained elevation of dendritic calcium to submicromolar concentrations during action potential trains evokes endocannabinoid release that suppresses PF synapses with no effect on glycinergic inputs. Parallel fiber activity can elevate CWC firing rates and evoke endocannabinoid release, thereby enabling CWCs to regulate the balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs to fusiform cells.
Slice electrophysiology
All experiments were conducted in accordance with procedures approved by the NIH Animal Care and Use Committee. Recordings were made from coronal brainstem slices (300 μm thick) prepared from P14 – P20 ICR and CBA/J mice of either sex. Dissections were performed in an ice-cold sucrose-based extracellular solution containing the following (in mM): 75 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 75 sucrose, 25 glucose, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 7 MgCl2, 0.5 CaCl2 (~325 mOsm). Slices were then incubated in the same solution for 20 min at 34°C, transferred to saline solution containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2 (~315 mOsm), and incubated for an additional 20 minutes at 34°C. In some experiments we performed the dissections at 30–31°C in extracellular solution containing the following (in mM): 130 NaCl, 20 NaHCO3, 10 glucose, 3 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 3 Na-HEPES, 1.3 MgSO4, 2.4 CaCl2 (~305 mOsm) and incubated the slices in the same solution at 34°C for 45 minutes. We did not observe any significant differences in results obtained using these two approaches, therefore we combined the experiments together. All solutions were bubbled with 5% O2/95% CO2. For voltage clamp recordings, glass electrodes (3–5 MΩ) filled with an intracellular solution containing the following (in mM) were used: 135 CsMeSO4, 15 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 1 MgCl2, 15 TEA-Cl, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP, 10 Tris-phosphocreatine, 2 QX-314 [2(triethylamino)-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)acetamine] (~300 mOsm), pH adjusted to 7.3 with CsOH. For current clamp recordings, the intracellular solution contained (in mM): 130 KMeSO4, 10 HEPES, 5 NaCl, 0.2 EGTA, 1 MgCl2, 4 Mg-ATP, 0.4 Na-GTP, 14 Tris-phosphocreatine (~300 mOsm), pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH. Recordings of IPSCs were made using the potassium-based intracellular solution to which 20 mM KCl was added, replacing an equimolar amount of KMeSO4 resulting in a chloride reversal potential of ~ −40 mV. ACSF was supplemented with 1 μM strychnine and 40 μM picrotoxin to block glycinergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission, with the exception of experiments in figure 7 measuring sIPSCs. Picrotoxin, AM251, U73122, edelfosine and TTX were from Tocris Cookson (Ellisville, MO). Alexa Fluor 594 hydrazide, Fluo-4FF and Fluo-5F were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). All experiments were performed at 34±1°C.
Data acquisition and analysis
Electrophysiology data were filtered at 3 kHz using a Multi Clamp 700B amplifier, and sampled at 10 kHz. Parallel fibers were stimulated with glass electrodes filled with saline and placed in the molecular layer of the DCN. Parallel fiber EPSCs were evoked with 200 μs current pulses (5–50 μA) delivered by an isolated stimulus unit. In voltage clamp recordings, cells were held at −60 to −70 mV. In current clamp recordings, hyperpolarizing current was injected to maintain the cartwheel cell membrane potential between −70 and −80 mV and suppress spontaneous firing. Bridge balance and pipette capacitance neutralization were set and adjusted throughout the experiment. For experiments monitoring effects of spike trains on spontaneous IPSCs (Fig. 7), the mode of the amplifier was switched between voltage clamp and current clamp using an external signal that was controlled by the data acquisition software. Data were acquired and analyzed using custom routines written in Igor Pro (Wavemetrics) and Matlab (Mathworks). Spontaneous IPSCs were detected using a derivative thresholding routine and aligned by their rising phase. Averages are presented as means ± S.E.M. Parameters of fits to the Hill equation are presented as means ± 95% confidence intervals.
Calcium imaging
Intracellular recording solutions were supplemented with Alexa Fluor 594 hydrazide (20 μM) to visualize the cell morphology, and the calcium indicators Fluo-5F (150 μM) or Fluo-4FF (500 μM), as indicated. EGTA was omitted from intracellular solutions during imaging experiments. We used a two-photon laser scanning microscope (2PLSM) with 60×, 0.9 NA objective (Olympus) and a Ti/sapphire pulsed laser (Chameleon; Coherent, Santa Clara, CA) tuned to 810 nm for excitation. Fluorescence signals were collected in the epifluorescence and transfluorescence pathways (using a 1.4 NA oil-immersion condenser). Fluorescence signals were separated using a 565 nm dichroic mirror and green and red fluorescence were collected using 525/50 nm and 629/53 nm bandpass filters, respectively (Semrock). Fluorescence was detected using H7442P and R9110 photomultipliers (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) for green and red channels, respectively. Imaging and physiology were controlled with custom software written in Matlab (Math Works, Natick, MA). Calcium transients were measured in line scan mode at 500 Hz across a spine and a parent dendritic shaft of cartwheel cells. Fluorescence signals were converted to calcium concentrations using the equation equation M1, where R is the experimentally measured ratio of green to red fluorescence. The values of Rmin and Rmax (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985) were measured with intracellular solutions containing 0 mM Ca/10 mM EGTA and 10 mM Ca, respectively. The KD values of Fluo-5F and Fluo-4FF used were 0.585 μM and 8.1 μM, respectively (Yasuda et al., 2004; Brenowitz et al., 2006).
Release of endocannabinoids by DCN cartwheel cells
Previous studies have shown that depolarization of cartwheel cells evokes release of endogenous cannabinoids that transiently suppress synaptic strength at their parallel-fiber synaptic inputs (Tzounopoulos et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2009). To further investigate the role of endocannabinoids at parallel fiber-CWC synapses and determine the calcium dependence of depolarization-induced suppression of excitation (DSE), whole cell voltage clamp recordings were obtained from CWCs and their identity was confirmed by visualizing the morphology of the cells with fluorescence microscopy (Figure 1A). The protocol for evoking DSE is shown in Figure 1B. To quantify DSE, the average amplitudes of the three EPSCs preceding (“pre”) and immediately following (“post”) a voltage step were measured, and DSE was defined as 1-(post/pre). DSE evoked by 5-second voltage steps under control conditions was 48.7±3.0% (Figure 1B, C; n=8). This suppression was abolished following bath application of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (Figure 1B, C; DSE = −0.6±1.3%; n=9). Maximum levels of DSE were obtained with 1-second voltage steps and no additional suppression was observed with more prolonged depolarization of cartwheel cells (Figure 1D).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Depolarization of cartwheel cells induces endocannabinoid-mediated suppression of excitatory synaptic transmission at parallel fiber to cartwheel cell synapses. A. A two-photon laser scanning microscope image of a cartwheel cell loaded with Alexa Fluor (more ...)
Calcium dependence of DSE
High levels of dendritic calcium are required for DSE in cerebellar Purkinje cells (Brenowitz and Regehr, 2003; Maejima et al., 2005), but the calcium requirement for DSE in cartwheel cells is not known. We therefore combined synaptic recordings with calcium imaging to determine the relationship between postsynaptic calcium transients and suppression of parallel fiber EPSCs. To measure dendritic calcium, cartwheel cells were loaded through the patch pipette with the low-affinity green fluorescent calcium indicator Fluo-4FF (500 μM, KD=8.1 μM). Since this indicator has very low fluorescence at resting calcium levels, neurons were also loaded with the red fluorophore Alexa-594 (20 μM) to permit visualization of dendrite and spine morphology (Fig. 2A). We used two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) to measure calcium transients evoked in CWC dendrites and spines by voltage steps. Both fluorophores were efficiently excited with a Ti-sapphire laser tuned to 810 nm, and fluorescence emission was separated with a dichroic mirror to allow simultaneous collection of green and red fluorescence. Line scans were performed at 500 Hz across a spine and its neighboring dendrite during voltage step trials (Fig. 2A, B), and fluorescence signals were converted to calcium concentrations using ratiometric equations as described in the methods.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calcium requirements for cartwheel cell DSE. A. Left, Image of the cartwheel cell loaded with Alexa Fluor 594. Right, Enlarged views of proximal and distal dendritic regions of interest (ROIs) indicated in the left panel by 1 and 2, respectively. Line (more ...)
Our strategy for measuring the calcium dependence of DSE was to determine the relationship between peak levels of dendritic calcium evoked by voltage steps and the amount of suppression of PF EPSCs. However, it was not possible to determine the precise dendritic location of the parallel fiber synapses because extracellular stimulation activated a population of fibers that synapse over a region of the CWC dendritic tree. Calcium levels may reach different levels in different dendritic regions as a result of spatial gradients of ion channel density, changes in dendrite diameter and the inability to voltage clamp electrotonically distant regions of the CWC dendrite. Therefore, we measured calcium transients in both proximal and distal CWC dendrites and spines to determine the range of calcium levels reached throughout the dendritic tree during voltage steps (Fig. 2C). Proximal regions were selected by locating spines that appeared on proximal dendrites closest to the soma (range: 22–27 μm from the center of the soma, n=5). Distal sites were chosen along the same dendritic branch at tips of dendrites near the pial surface (range: 80–116 μm from the center of the soma measured along the dendritic path, n=5). An example of such an experiment is shown in Fig. 2C in which calcium transients were measured in a proximal and a distal dendritic location in response to 1 second depolarizations. In a proximal dendrite 25 μm from the soma, calcium reached a plateau of 6.7 μM during the voltage step. In a subsequent trial in the same neuron at a distal site 96 μm from the soma, dendritic calcium reached 6.5 μM (6% lower than at the proximal site). During voltage steps ranging from 0.1 to 5 seconds, calcium at distal sites reached levels that were 9.4±3.3% lower than at proximal sites (n=5 neurons, data not shown). In addition, peak levels of calcium in dendritic spines and the neighboring shaft were not significantly different, so in subsequent voltage clamp experiments we focused on measuring calcium transients in proximal dendritic shafts of CWCs.
To determine the dependence of the amount of DSE on the peak dendritic calcium during voltage steps, we combined synaptic recordings with dendritic calcium imaging in the same neurons. Data from a representative CWC is shown in Figure 2D, E. In this neuron, a voltage step of 0.1 second elevated calcium to 2.0 μM in the proximal dendrite but the EPSC was not suppressed. When the voltage step was extended to 0.5 second, peak dendritic calcium reached 5.6 μM and EPSCs were suppressed by 52%. Prolonging the voltage step to 1 and 5 seconds further elevated calcium and increased DSE to 61% and 65%, respectively. Results from a group of 5 neurons are summarized in Figure 2F, G. Maximal suppression of EPSCs was 53.4±4.8% and was obtained with voltage steps of 1–5 seconds that produced peak calcium transients of 7.4±1.0 μM in proximal dendrites and 6.1±1.1μM in distal dendrites (Fig. 1D, ,2F2F).
To obtain a measure of the calcium dependence of DSE in CWCs, we plotted the amount of DSE for each trial against peak dendritic calcium measured in proximal regions of CWC dendrites (Fig. 2G). A fit of the data points to the Hill equation indicated that the dendritic calcium concentration producing half-maximal DSE was 3.9 μM and the Hill coefficient was 5.7. Because calcium levels in distal regions of CWC dendrites are slightly lower, our results demonstrate a high calcium requirement for DSE in the range of 3.6–3.9 μM. Also, because of the steep cooperativity, brief calcium transients with peaks less than ~2 μM are not effective in evoking endocannabinoid release.
Dendritic calcium transients during spontaneous CWC activity
Because CWCs fire spontaneously in vivo (Davis and Young, 1997; Ding and Voigt, 1997; Portfors and Roberts, 2007) and in brain slices (Zhang and Oertel, 1993; Kim and Trussell, 2007) we investigated whether action potential backpropagation during sustained firing of CWCs could elevate dendritic calcium and evoke endocannabinoid release. Spontaneous firing rates of CWCs in slices measured with cell-attached recordings (Fig. 3A, top) ranged from 12 to 26 Hz (mean 18±2, n=10). In whole-cell current clamp recordings, CWCs held with zero bias current were spontaneously active at 21.3±0.8 Hz (range: 19.5–23.9 Hz, n=6, Fig. 3A, bottom). Although in some cases complex spikes were observed, in subsequent experiments we focused on the role of simple sodium spikes in producing dendritic calcium transients and retrograde inhibition, and cells firing complex spikes at rates above 1 Hz were excluded from our analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sodium action potentials backpropagate into the cartwheel cell dendrites and elevate intracellular calcium. A. Cartwheel cells are spontaneously active. Top, cell-attached recording of action potentials in tonic firing mode, performed in voltage-clamp (more ...)
Action potentials in CWCs can backpropagate and evoke dendritic calcium transients (Molitor and Manis, 2003; Roberts et al., 2008). We measured calcium transients in CWC dendrites and spines at proximal and distal locations to confirm that calcium transients propagate throughout the dendritic tree. In response to single action potentials triggered with brief current injections (2 ms, 1–2 nA), calcium transients were always observed in both proximal and distal dendrites and spines of CWCs (Fig. 3B), indicating that calcium levels throughout CWC dendrites become elevated during ongoing spontaneous firing. To determine the relationship between CWC firing rates and dendritic calcium levels during spike trains, we measured dendritic calcium during spike trains of different frequencies that were obtained by varying the amplitude of current injections. Results from a representative CWC are shown in Fig. 3C (left). In response to a series of current steps that ranged from 100–500 pA, dendritic calcium levels reached a plateau level that was dependent on the CWC firing frequency. Data from multiple trials from 6 CWCs were binned by spike rate, indicating that dendritic calcium levels progressively increase with firing rates in CWCs (Fig. 3C, right). In addition, the differences in calcium levels between spines and neighboring dendritic shafts following single spikes in proximal dendritic regions (Fig. 3B) were not observed during trains of action potentials. These results indicate that during spontaneous firing, dendritic calcium increases to a plateau level of several hundred nanomolar, and suggest that prolonged spiking could evoke endocannabinoid release from CWC dendrites and produce retrograde suppression of parallel fiber inputs.
Repetitive firing evokes endocannabinoid release and suppression of parallel fiber synapses
To test whether sustained firing by CWCs evokes endocannabinoid release, we measured parallel fiber EPSPs before and after spike trains of 15 second duration. Current injection amplitudes were adjusted to generate sustained firing of simple spikes throughout the 15 second trial, and PF EPSPs were evoked at 0.5 Hz before and after the spike train. A representative trial is shown in Fig. 4A in which the CWC fired for 15 seconds at a mean rate of 34.5 Hz. Suppression of EPSPs (calculated as the ratio of the mean of 3 EPSPs evoked after vs. before the spike train) was 79%, and returned to baseline levels over about 20 seconds (Fig. 4B). We next examined the effects of varying the duration of CWC firing on parallel fiber suppression by monitoring EPSP amplitudes before and after action potential trains of 1, 5 and 15 seconds (Fig. 4C). For the 5 neurons tested, mean firing rates during the spike train were 42±2 Hz. After 1 second of firing, no suppression of PF EPSP amplitudes was observed (p>0.05, t test). Following 5 and 15-second spike trains, the amplitudes of EPSPs evoked 1 second after the spike train were suppressed by 38.1±8.8% (p<0.01, t test) and 79.6±3.5% (p<0.01, t test), respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Suppression of parallel fiber synapses following sustained firing of cartwheel cells requires endocannabinoid release. A. Top, Schematic of the experimental protocol. Parallel fiber EPSPs were monitored with 0.5 Hz stimulation in CWCs before and after (more ...)
To test the role of endocannabinoid release in PF suppression, we repeated the 15 second spike trains in the presence of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (Fig. 4D, E). As demonstrated in the group data (Fig. 4E), EPSP suppression by the 15-second spike train was reduced from 75.5±2.8% (control, n=4) to 9.6±3.7% (AM251, n=4). The amplitudes of EPSPs evoked 3 or more seconds after the end of a 15 second spike train were not significantly different from the pre-stimulus baseline (p>0.05, t test, n=4). However, the EPSP evoked 1 second after the termination of action potential firing was suppressed by 22±7% (p<0.05, t test, n=4) relative to EPSP amplitudes before the spike train. Suppression of the first EPSP in the presence of AM251 could arise from a variety of mechanisms, including incomplete blockade of CB1 receptors, release of an additional retrograde messenger, or alteration in dendritic filtering following 15-second action potential trains. In contrast, under control conditions, PF suppression was substantially greater and the amplitudes of EPSPs remained significantly suppressed for more than 20 seconds after the spike train. The results indicate that sustained firing by cartwheel cells evokes endocannabinoid release that causes prolonged suppression of PF inputs.
Endocannabinoid production can be greatly facilitated by synergistic interactions between postsynaptic calcium and metabotropic receptors coupled to Gq/11 proteins that activate phospholipase C (PLC) (Maejima et al., 2001; Varma et al., 2001; Ohno-Shosaku et al., 2002; Brown et al., 2003; Brenowitz and Regehr, 2005). Cartwheel cells express multiple Gq/11-coupled metabotropic receptors including mGluR1 (Petralia et al., 1996; Wright et al., 1996; Molitor and Manis, 1997; Fujino and Oertel, 2003) and M1/M3 mAchRs (Chen et al., 1995). To test whether PLC-coupled metabotropic receptors contribute to spike-evoked endocannabinoid release, we performed experiments using the PLC inhibitors U73122 (5 μM) and edelfosine (10 μM). Slices were incubated in either U73122 or edelfosine for at least 30 minutes, and physiological recordings were performed in the continued presence of the drug. Suppression of PF EPSPs during 15-second spike trains was not affected by pharmacological block of PLC with either inhibitor (Fig. 5A, B).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Suppression of parallel fiber synapses following sustained firing of cartwheel cells is independent of PLC pathway activation. A. Left, EPSPs recorded in the presence of the PLC inhibitor U73122, before and after a 15-second spike train. Right, Time course (more ...)
Recent studies have shown that the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) is responsible for DSE, DSI and PLC-dependent endocannabinoid release in several brain regions (Zhao et al., 2009; Gao et al., 2010; Tanimura et al., 2010). However, the identity of the endocannabinoid released during sustained firing of CWCs is not known. Therefore, to further explore the mechanism of endocannabinoid release from CWCs during spike trains we examined the effects of tetrahydrolipostatin (THL), an inhibitor of diacylglycerol lipase, the major biosynthetic enzyme for 2-AG. We found that application of THL (10 μM) strongly reduced suppression of EPSPs evoked by 15-second tonic firing of CWCs (Fig. 5C, D, 17±.4% suppression in THL vs. 86±4% suppression under control conditions, n=4). Consistent with a recent study (Zhao et al., 2009), we also observed that THL greatly reduces DSE at PF-CWC synapses (Fig. 5E, F, 14±2% suppression in THL vs. 69±5% under control conditions, n=3). Together, our results indicate that Gq/11-coupled metabotropic receptors do not contribute to spike-evoked endocannabinoid release, and suggest that elevation of dendritic calcium evoked by backpropagating action potentials or direct depolarization causes synthesis and release of 2-AG from CWCs that results in PF suppression.
Calcium dependence of spiking-evoked PF suppression
Based on our findings that dendritic calcium levels are dependent on CWC firing rates (Fig. 3C), we next examined the calcium dependence of spiking-evoked PF suppression in CWCs by combining physiological recordings of EPSPs with calcium measurements in CWC dendrites. In these experiments, we applied current injections (200–500 pA) during 15-second spike trains to vary the CWC firing rate between 5–50 Hz. As in the case of DSE experiments, we first compared calcium transients in proximal and distal regions of the CWC dendrite to determine the range of postsynaptic calcium levels at parallel fiber synapses throughout the CWC. Despite the differences in peak calcium levels in response to a single action potential (Fig. 3B), calcium levels were not different in proximal and distal dendrites during 15 second spike trains (Fig. 6A, B). Moreover, calcium levels in spines and the parent dendrite were not different in either proximal or distal regions (Fig. 6A). Therefore in the following experiments to determine the calcium dependence of spiking-evoked PF suppression by CWCs, we focused on measuring calcium transients in dendritic shafts.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Submicromolar elevation of dendritic calcium in CWCs during tonic spiking evokes endocannabinoid release and suppression of parallel fiber synapses. A. Calcium transients in proximal (top) and distal (bottom) dendrite of a representative CWC during a (more ...)
Our experimental approach for measuring the relationship between dendritic calcium and suppression of PF EPSPs is illustrated in Fig. 6C–D for a representative neuron. Dendritic calcium was measured during 15-second spike trains at 5–50 Hz. In this neuron the range of action potential firing rates raised dendritic calcium to levels that did not exceed 1 μM (Fig. 6C) yet produced strong suppression of PF EPSPs (Fig. 6D). Calcium levels were dependent on CWC firing rates (Fig. 6E) and there was a clear trend towards greater amounts of PF suppression with higher firing rates (Fig. 6F). The results indicate that PF EPSPs are suppressed by >50% with submicromolar levels of calcium. This analysis was repeated in a group of 9 neurons, and the data was fitted to the Hill equation (Fig. 6GH). The parameters of the fit indicated that half-maximal suppression of EPSPs occurred at mean dendritic calcium levels of 0.40±0.07 μM. Compared to DSE, which was half-maximal at 3.9 μM calcium (Fig. 2G), this reflects roughly a 10-fold increase in calcium sensitivity. Thus, submicromolar elevation of dendritic calcium that occurs under conditions where CWC firing rates exceed ~25 Hz for 15 seconds causes strong suppression of parallel fiber synapses mediated by retrograde endocannabinoid signaling.
If the same calcium-dependent signaling pathway is responsible for both DSE and spike-evoked PF suppression in CWCs, it is possible that the long duration of the low-level calcium signal during spike trains compensates for the lower peak requirement compared to DSE. To examine this possibility, we calculated the integral of the calcium transient for experiments in which DSE (from figure 2G) and spike-evoked PF suppression (from figure 6G) were measured (Figure 6H). The integrated calcium transient is proportional to the total calcium influx evoked by either voltage steps or spike trains and can be directly compared because the same concentration of calcium indicator was used for both voltage clamp and current clamp experiments (Neher and Augustine, 1992; Schneggenburger et al., 1993). This analysis indicates that although calcium levels driving endocannabinoid release during CWC spike trains are ~10-fold lower than during DSE trials, a larger total calcium influx is required to obtain a given amount of PF suppression during a spike train compared to a DSE trial.
Endocannabinoids released from cartwheel cells during sustained tonic firing do not suppress inhibitory synapses to cartwheel cells
In addition to glutamatergic PF synaptic inputs, cartwheel cells receive glycinergic and GABAergic inputs from other cartwheel cells and superficial stellate cells (Zhang and Oertel, 1993; Davis and Young, 2000; Roberts et al., 2008). Therefore, we tested the possibility that endocannabinoids released by CWC dendrites during spike trains also suppress these inhibitory synapses. Spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) were recorded from voltage-clamped CWCs at a holding potential of −70 mV in extracellular solution supplemented with DNQX (10 μM) to block AMPA receptors. The intracellular concentrations of chloride ions was adjusted so that ECl = ~ −40 mV. Synaptic currents recorded under these conditions were confirmed to be glycinergic/GABAergic as all events could be completely blocked by strychnine (1 μM) and picrotoxin (40 μM) (Fig. 7A). sIPSCs were also confirmed to arise from presynaptic spiking because they were eliminated by application of tetrodotoxin (0.5 μM) (Fig. 7B). To test for suppression of sIPSCs by CWC spiking, sIPSCs were recorded in voltage clamp for 20 seconds before the amplifier was switched to current-clamp mode to deliver a 15 second current injection. After termination of CWC firing, the amplifier mode was switched back to voltage clamp and sIPSCs were recorded for 40 seconds. A representative example of this protocol is shown in Fig. 7C in which the CWC fired in tonic mode for 15 seconds at a rate of 39.2 Hz. When sIPSCs were collected and averaged over a 5-second period immediately before and after the spike train, no change was observed in the sIPSC amplitude (Fig. 7C). For the 5 neurons tested (Fig. 7D), the average firing rates were 36±3 Hz, a range sufficient to evoke endocannabinoid release and significant suppression of PF synapses (Figs. 46). Individual events were collected, binned in 1 s intervals, and sIPSC amplitudes were averaged and plotted for each 1 second interval. Figure 7D shows that sustained firing of CWCs had no effect on sIPSC amplitudes.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Endocannabinoids released from cartwheel cells during sustained firing do not suppress inhibitory cartwheel or stellate cell inputs. A. sIPSCs were recorded in voltage-clamp at −70 mV (ECl = ~−40 mV) in continuous presence of DNQX (10 (more ...)
Parallel fiber excitation elevates CWCs firing rates and evokes endocannabinoid release
We next tested whether the ongoing spontaneous activity of CWCs produces tonic release of endocannabinoids by comparing PF EPSPs before and after a 15 second period in which the CWC fired spontaneously with a bias current of 0 pA (Fig. 8A). During the spontaneous firing period, CWCs fired almost exclusively simple spikes at 21.3±0.8 Hz (n=6). PF EPSPs were not suppressed by this spontaneous firing (EPSP amplitudes were 100±9.2% relative to pre-firing amplitudes, n=6), indicating that spontaneous CWC firing rates are not sufficiently high to produce tonic release of endocannabinoids.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Pathway-specific endocannabinoid release evoked by combined PF stimulation and CWC spontaneous firing. Two stimulus electrodes were used to activate independent populations of PF synapses (paths 1 and 2) onto a postsynaptic CWC. Data from the same representative (more ...)
One mechanism that could increase CWC firing rates and evoke endocannabinoid release is excitatory input from parallel fibers. Therefore we performed a series of experiments to examine the role of PF excitation in elevating CWC firing rates and causing suppression of PF synapses through release of endocannabinoids from CWCs. Stimulation of PF inputs at 10 Hz for 15 seconds while maintaining the CWC at a hyperpolarized membrane potential resulted in strong post-tetanic potentiation of PF EPSPs (Fig. 8B) that decayed over 20–30 seconds. We next combined 10 Hz PF stimulation with a current injection that maintained the CWC at a holding current of 0 pA (Fig 8C). Despite increasing CWC firing rates to 28.6±2.0 Hz (n=6), PF EPSPs remained strongly potentiated (209±23% relative to pre-firing amplitudes, n=6). When this protocol was repeated in the presence of AM251, the amplitudes of PF EPSPs showed only a slight enhancement (Fig. 8F, 214±23% relative to preconditioning amplitudes, p>0.05, n=4). These results indicate that any potential effect of endocannabinoid release from the CWC on PF EPSP amplitudes was obscured by the strong potentiation of EPSPs following sustained 10 Hz stimulation.
Therefore, to test for global endocannabinoid release during elevated rates of CWC firing, we performed experiments in which a second stimulus electrode placed in the molecular layer of the DCN was used to activate an independent set of parallel fiber inputs to the postsynaptic CWC (Fig. 8D). The independence of the two parallel fiber pathways was tested by demonstrating the absence of paired-pulse facilitation when alternate pathways were stimulated at 20–50 msec intervals (Brown et al., 2003; Tzounopoulos et al., 2007). In these experiments we monitored the amplitudes of EPSPs evoked by stimulation of parallel fiber pathway 1 before and after a 15-second conditioning stimulus during which the second pathway was activated at 10 Hz during the 15-second period of spontaneous CWC firing. Stimulation of PF pathway 2 increased the firing rates of CWCs from 21.3±0.8 Hz to 29.7±2.1 Hz (Fig. 8E, n=6). Following this stimulus protocol, PF EPSPs from pathway 1 were suppressed to 57.3±4.0% (Fig. 8D, F, n=6 neurons, 12 pathways) of their pre-conditioning amplitudes. In each neuron, the ability of each parallel fiber pathway to suppress the other was reciprocally tested. This suppression of PF EPSPs was abolished in the presence of AM251 (Fig. 8F, 101.7±10.1% relative to preconditioning amplitudes, n=4). These results demonstrate that parallel fiber stimulation can elevate the CWC firing rate and cause global release of endocannabinoids. This form of endocannabinoid-mediated synaptic plasticity is heterosynaptic in nature because it is restricted to the population of parallel fiber inputs that are not repetitively activated during the conditioning stimulus. Under these conditions, highly active synapses that increase CWC firing rates became potentiated, whereas synaptic inputs that were inactive exhibit short-term suppression that recovered over 10–15 seconds as a result of endocannabinoid release from the CWC.
Here we investigated the role of calcium-dependent endocannabinoid release in transient suppression of synaptic inputs onto cartwheel cells of the DCN. We find that calcium levels of ~4 μM are required for half-maximal DSE at parallel fiber synapses. However, prolonged calcium elevations during CWC firing reduces the calcium requirement for endocannabinoid release by 10-fold such that sub-micromolar elevations of dendritic calcium cause suppression of PF EPSP amplitudes by >70%. Spiking-evoked endocannabinoid release does not require activation of PLC, but requires activation of DAG-lipase, suggesting that elevation of dendritic calcium produced by action potential backpropagation causes release of the endocannabinoid 2-AG from CWC dendrites. Although basal rates of spontaneous CWC activity (~20 Hz) are insufficient to cause suppression of PF synapses, elevating CWC firing rates by stimulation of parallel fibers triggers endocannabinoid-mediated PF suppression in a pathway-specific and heterosynaptic manner. Glycinergic/GABAergic inputs onto CWCs do not exhibit spike-mediated suppression. Our findings demonstrate a novel form of heterosynaptic plasticity mediated by endocannabinoids that selectively suppress subsets of PF inputs to CWCs and may thereby influence the output of the DCN.
Calcium-dependent mechanisms of endocannabinoid release
Consistent with previous studies (Wang and Zucker, 2001; Brenowitz and Regehr, 2003; Maejima et al., 2005), we find that DSE in CWCs requires large elevations of dendritic calcium to several micromolar. Because of the cooperativity between postsynaptic calcium and DSE indicated by the large Hill coefficient, small calcium transients are unable to evoke endocannabinoid release. It is likely that calcium levels sufficient to evoke DSE may occur only under very high activity levels or pathological conditions.
The high calcium requirement for DSE at PF-CWC synapses prompted us to investigate mechanisms that could evoke endocannabinoid release under more physiological conditions. CWCs exhibit spontaneous activity both in vivo and in brain slices, and their firing rates can exceed 100 Hz in response to both auditory and somatosensory stimulation (Davis and Young, 1997; Ding and Voigt, 1997). Since backpropagation of action potentials causes elevation of dendritic calcium, we examined the effects of simple spike trains on PF EPSPs and find that spike trains of 5–15 seconds produced significant amplitude suppression that is dependent on CB1 receptor activation. Moreover, amplitude suppression is not affected by PLC inhibitors, suggesting that spike-evoked suppression of PF EPSPs is dependent solely on elevation of dendritic calcium caused by action potential backpropagation.
Consistent with recent studies indicating that 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) is responsible for the endogenous cannabinoid released from neurons in response to elevated calcium (Gao et al., 2010; Tanimura et al., 2010), we found that inhibition of DAG-lipase prevented both DSE and spike-evoked endocannabinoid release from CWCs. Despite the common requirement for DAG lipase activity, however, endocannabinoid release from CWCs during trains of action potentials was evoked by elevation of dendritic calcium levels that were ~10-fold lower than required for DSE. One explanation for this difference is that the longer duration of calcium elevation during spike trains compensates for the lower calcium requirement. However, a comparison of the calcium integral for both DSE and spike-evoked PF suppression indicates that greater total calcium influx is required for spike-evoked parallel fiber suppression. This suggests the possibility that distinct cellular mechanisms may be responsible for production of DAG, one with high calcium affinity and slow kinetics, and another with lower affinity and faster kinetics. Another explanation is that DSE requires less total calcium influx because rapid release of endocannabinoids could saturate uptake and degradation mechanisms thereby increasing CB1 receptor activation. However, measurement of suppression of synaptic responses does not provide a linear readout of endocannabinoid production, making it difficult to distinguish among these mechanisms.
CWCs can fire both simple and complex spikes (Zhang and Oertel, 1993; Manis et al., 1994; Golding and Oertel, 1997). In this study we primarily tested stimulus conditions that produced simple sodium spikes, but dendritic calcium transients generated by complex spikes are considerably larger than produced by simple spikes (Roberts et al., 2008). Conditions that promote complex spiking are therefore likely to produce more prominent endocannabinoid release than observed under our experimental conditions.
Input-specificity of spiking-evoked suppression
Although CB1 receptors are located on presynaptic inhibitory inputs to CWCs and can be activated by exogenous CB1 agonists (Tzounopoulos et al., 2007), these synapses do not exhibit DSI (Zhao et al., 2009). Electron microscopic and pharmacological data suggest that the differential sensitivity of excitatory and inhibitory inputs to CWCs may result from lower levels of CB1 expression on presynaptic terminals of inhibitory inputs (Tzounopoulos et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2009). Consistent with these findings, we observed that CWC firing does not cause suppression of IPSCs. Endocannabinoid release evoked by elevated CWC firing rates will therefore selectively suppress excitatory but not inhibitory inputs.
Mechanisms influencing CWC firing rates
CWCs fire spontaneously in vivo at mean rates of about 10–20 Hz (Ding and Voigt, 1997; Portfors and Roberts, 2007) in mice and gerbils. In our slice recording tonic endocannabinoid release did not occur at these firing rates. However, endocannabinoid release was evoked when firing rates exceed ~25–30 Hz for several seconds. Consistent with these observations, the relationship between plateau levels of dendritic calcium and CWC firing rate (Fig. 3C, ,6B)6B) began to climb more steeply above 20 Hz. In future studies it will be of interest to investigate the possibility that different sources of calcium contribute to endocannabinoid release in response to voltage steps and trains of backpropagating action potentials.
Implications for DCN function
Endocannabinoid release produced by submicromolar calcium elevations suggest that endocannabinoid signaling occurs under physiologically realistic conditions. Mechanisms that elevate CWC firing rates in vivo include somatosensory and acoustic stimuli. CWCs respond strongly to activation of brainstem nuclei such as the dorsal column nuclei and spinal trigeminal nucleus that convey information about head and pinna position (Davis and Young, 1997; Ding and Voigt, 1997; Kanold and Young, 2001). Our data suggest that endocannabinoid release from CWCs occurs in response to modest elevations of CWC firing rates for several seconds and may therefore occur in response to a wide range of stimuli that activate parallel fibers.
In vivo studies have shown that somatosensory inputs that activate the parallel fiber pathway provide strong suppression of fusiform cells that provide the main output of the DCN (Davis et al., 1996; Davis and Young, 1997; Kanold and Young, 2001; Koehler et al., 2011). This suppression results from feedforward inhibition of fusiform cells by CWCs. By suppressing PF strength, endocannabinoids released by CWCs can regulate the strength of this feedforward inhibition. Recent studies indicate that parallel fibers make sparse contacts among neighboring CWCs and fusiform cells, whereas CWCs have a high probability of contacting their neighbors (Mancilla and Manis, 2009; Roberts and Trussell, 2010). Parallel fibers that exhibit periods of high activity will therefore elevate CWC firing, producing lateral inhibition among the CWC network and suppressing fusiform cell output. Because of the sparseness of PF innervation of neighboring CWCs, less active parallel fiber synapses onto a particular CWC can become suppressed but still retain their ability to activate other CWCs.
In addition to spike-timing dependent long-term plasticity mediated by endocannabinoid release from CWCs (Tzounopoulos et al., 2007), retrograde signaling by endocannabinoids at PF-CWC synapses may also provide a physiological mechanism for short-term plasticity of PF synapses. We find that parallel fiber activity can elevate CWCs firing rates and evoke release of endocannabinoids, as revealed by monitoring synaptic responses in an independent group of PF inputs to the CWC. Despite the release of endocannabinoids from the postsynaptic CWC, the subset of active parallel fiber inputs that drive high-frequency CWC activity exhibits post-tetanic potentiation (PTP), a form of short-term synaptic enhancement that lasts tens of seconds and results from accumulation of presynaptic calcium during repetitive synaptic activity (Zucker and Regehr, 2002). Enhancement of release by PTP can act through an increase in presynaptic calcium influx per action potential (Habets and Borst, 2006), enhancement of the sensitivity of neurotransmitter release to calcium (Korogod et al., 2007) and an increase in the size of the readily releasable pool (Habets and Borst, 2007; Lee et al., 2010). These mechanisms act in opposition to CB1 receptors which reduce calcium influx into the presynaptic terminal by inhibiting voltage-gated calcium channels (Brown et al., 2004). Presynaptic enhancement caused by PTP may therefore overcome the suppression mediated by CB1 receptor activation under our experimental conditions. Subsets of PF inputs can thus evoke suppression of other inputs in a heterosynaptic manner while remaining potentiated themselves, by evoking endocannabinoid release from the postsynaptic CWC. In this way, somatosensory input from one particular source or modality could reduce the ability of inputs from another source to influence the firing rate of a CWC. Activation of as few as 3 parallel fiber synapses are sufficient to significantly elevate spontaneous CWC firing rates (Roberts and Trussell, 2010), suggesting that activity of only a small fraction of the total population of parallel fiber inputs to a CWC would be required to elevate firing rates to levels that would evoke endocannabinoid release.
We thank Drs. Jeff Diamond, David Lovinger, Ron Petralia and Shan He for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the NIDCD Intramural Research Program.
  • Berrebi AS, Morgan JI, Mugnaini E. The Purkinje cell class may extend beyond the cerebellum. J Neurocytol. 1990;19:643–654. [PubMed]
  • Brenowitz SD, Regehr WG. Calcium dependence of retrograde inhibition by endocannabinoids at synapses onto Purkinje cells. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2003;23:6373–6384. [PubMed]
  • Brenowitz SD, Regehr WG. Associative short-term synaptic plasticity mediated by endocannabinoids. Neuron. 2005;45:419–431. [PubMed]
  • Brenowitz SD, Best AR, Regehr WG. Sustained elevation of dendritic calcium evokes widespread endocannabinoid release and suppression of synapses onto cerebellar Purkinje cells. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2006;26:6841–6850. [PubMed]
  • Brown SP, Brenowitz SD, Regehr WG. Brief presynaptic bursts evoke synapse-specific retrograde inhibition mediated by endogenous cannabinoids. Nature neuroscience. 2003;6:1048–1057. [PubMed]
  • Brown SP, Safo PK, Regehr WG. Endocannabinoids inhibit transmission at granule cell to Purkinje cell synapses by modulating three types of presynaptic calcium channels. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2004;24:5623–5631. [PubMed]
  • Chen K, Waller HJ, Godfrey DA. Muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus. Hear Res. 1995;89:137–145. [PubMed]
  • Davis KA, Young ED. Granule cell activation of complex-spiking neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1997;17:6798–6806. [PubMed]
  • Davis KA, Young ED. Pharmacological evidence of inhibitory and disinhibitory neuronal circuits in dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 2000;83:926–940. [PubMed]
  • Davis KA, Miller RL, Young ED. Effects of somatosensory and parallel-fiber stimulation on neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 1996;76:3012–3024. [PubMed]
  • Ding J, Voigt HF. Intracellular response properties of units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized decerebrate gerbil. Journal of neurophysiology. 1997;77:2549–2572. [PubMed]
  • Freund TF, Katona I, Piomelli D. Role of endogenous cannabinoids in synaptic signaling. Physiol Rev. 2003;83:1017–1066. [PubMed]
  • Fujino K, Oertel D. Bidirectional synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum-like mammalian dorsal cochlear nucleus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:265–270. [PubMed]
  • Gao Y, et al. Loss of retrograde endocannabinoid signaling and reduced adult neurogenesis in diacylglycerol lipase knock-out mice. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2010;30:2017–2024. [PubMed]
  • Golding NL, Oertel D. Physiological identification of the targets of cartwheel cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 1997;78:248–260. [PubMed]
  • Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed]
  • Habets RL, Borst JG. An increase in calcium influx contributes to post-tetanic potentiation at the rat calyx of Held synapse. Journal of neurophysiology. 2006;96:2868–2876. [PubMed]
  • Habets RL, Borst JG. Dynamics of the readily releasable pool during post-tetanic potentiation in the rat calyx of Held synapse. The Journal of physiology. 2007;581:467–478. [PubMed]
  • Kano M, Ohno-Shosaku T, Hashimotodani Y, Uchigashima M, Watanabe M. Endocannabinoid-mediated control of synaptic transmission. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:309–380. [PubMed]
  • Kanold PO, Young ED. Proprioceptive information from the pinna provides somatosensory input to cat dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2001;21:7848–7858. [PubMed]
  • Kanold PO, Davis KA, Young ED. Somatosensory context alters auditory responses in the cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 2011;105:1063–1070. [PubMed]
  • Kim Y, Trussell LO. Ion channels generating complex spikes in cartwheel cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 2007;97:1705–1725. [PubMed]
  • Koehler SD, Pradhan S, Manis PB, Shore SE. Somatosensory inputs modify auditory spike timing in dorsal cochlear nucleus principal cells. The European journal of neuroscience. 2011;33:409–420. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Korogod N, Lou X, Schneggenburger R. Posttetanic potentiation critically depends on an enhanced Ca(2+) sensitivity of vesicle fusion mediated by presynaptic PKC. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:15923–15928. [PubMed]
  • Kreitzer AC, Regehr WG. Retrograde inhibition of presynaptic calcium influx by endogenous cannabinoids at excitatory synapses onto Purkinje cells. Neuron. 2001;29:717–727. [PubMed]
  • Lee JS, Ho WK, Lee SH. Post-tetanic increase in the fast-releasing synaptic vesicle pool at the expense of the slowly releasing pool. J Gen Physiol. 2010;136:259–272. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Maejima T, Hashimoto K, Yoshida T, Aiba A, Kano M. Presynaptic inhibition caused by retrograde signal from metabotropic glutamate to cannabinoid receptors. Neuron. 2001;31:463–475. [PubMed]
  • Maejima T, Oka S, Hashimotodani Y, Ohno-Shosaku T, Aiba A, Wu D, Waku K, Sugiura T, Kano M. Synaptically driven endocannabinoid release requires Ca2+-assisted metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 to phospholipase Cbeta4 signaling cascade in the cerebellum. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2005;25:6826–6835. [PubMed]
  • Mancilla JG, Manis PB. Two distinct types of inhibition mediated by cartwheel cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 2009;102:1287–1295. [PubMed]
  • Manis PB, Spirou GA, Wright DD, Paydar S, Ryugo DK. Physiology and morphology of complex spiking neurons in the guinea pig dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1994;348:261–276. [PubMed]
  • Molitor SC, Manis PB. Evidence for functional metabotropic glutamate receptors in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 1997;77:1889–1905. [PubMed]
  • Molitor SC, Manis PB. Dendritic Ca2+ transients evoked by action potentials in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal and cartwheel neurons. Journal of neurophysiology. 2003;89:2225–2237. [PubMed]
  • Mugnaini E, Berrebi AS, Dahl AL, Morgan JI. The polypeptide PEP-19 is a marker for Purkinje neurons in cerebellar cortex and cartwheel neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Arch Ital Biol. 1987;126:41–67. [PubMed]
  • Myoga MH, Beierlein M, Regehr WG. Somatic spikes regulate dendritic signaling in small neurons in the absence of backpropagating action potentials. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:7803–7814. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Neher E, Augustine GJ. Calcium gradients and buffers in bovine chromaffin cells. The Journal of physiology. 1992;450:273–301. [PubMed]
  • Oertel D, Young ED. What’s a cerebellar circuit doing in the auditory system? Trends in neurosciences. 2004;27:104–110. [PubMed]
  • Ohno-Shosaku T, Maejima T, Kano M. Endogenous cannabinoids mediate retrograde signals from depolarized postsynaptic neurons to presynaptic terminals. Neuron. 2001;29:729–738. [PubMed]
  • Ohno-Shosaku T, Shosaku J, Tsubokawa H, Kano M. Cooperative endocannabinoid production by neuronal depolarization and group I metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;15:953–961. [PubMed]
  • Petralia RS, Wang YX, Zhao HM, Wenthold RJ. Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors show unique postsynaptic, presynaptic, and glial localizations in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1996;372:356–383. [PubMed]
  • Portfors CV, Roberts PD. Temporal and frequency characteristics of cartwheel cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the awake mouse. Journal of neurophysiology. 2007;98:744–756. [PubMed]
  • Requarth T, Sawtell NB. Neural mechanisms for filtering self-generated sensory signals in cerebellum-like circuits. Current opinion in neurobiology 2011 [PubMed]
  • Roberts MT, Trussell LO. Molecular layer inhibitory interneurons provide feedforward and lateral inhibition in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Journal of neurophysiology. 2010;104:2462–2473. [PubMed]
  • Roberts MT, Bender KJ, Trussell LO. Fidelity of complex spike-mediated synaptic transmission between inhibitory interneurons. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2008;28:9440–9450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schneggenburger R, Zhou Z, Konnerth A, Neher E. Fractional contribution of calcium to the cation current through glutamate receptor channels. Neuron. 1993;11:133–143. [PubMed]
  • Shore SE, Zhou J. Somatosensory influence on the cochlear nucleus and beyond. Hear Res. 2006;216–217:90–99. [PubMed]
  • Shore SE, Vass Z, Wys NL, Altschuler RA. Trigeminal ganglion innervates the auditory brainstem. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2000;419:271–285. [PubMed]
  • Tanimura A, Yamazaki M, Hashimotodani Y, Uchigashima M, Kawata S, Abe M, Kita Y, Hashimoto K, Shimizu T, Watanabe M, Sakimura K, Kano M. The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol produced by diacylglycerol lipase alpha mediates retrograde suppression of synaptic transmission. Neuron. 2010;65:320–327. [PubMed]
  • Tzounopoulos T, Rubio ME, Keen JE, Trussell LO. Coactivation of pre- and postsynaptic signaling mechanisms determines cell-specific spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Neuron. 2007;54:291–301. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Varma N, Carlson GC, Ledent C, Alger BE. Metabotropic glutamate receptors drive the endocannabinoid system in hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC188. [PubMed]
  • Wang J, Zucker RS. Photolysis-induced suppression of inhibition in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Physiol. 2001;533:757–763. [PubMed]
  • Wilson RI, Nicoll RA. Endogenous cannabinoids mediate retrograde signalling at hippocampal synapses. Nature. 2001;410:588–592. [PubMed]
  • Wilson RI, Nicoll RA. Endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. Science. 2002;296:678–682. [PubMed]
  • Wright DD, Ryugo DK. Mossy fiber projections from the cuneate nucleus to the cochlear nucleus in the rat. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1996;365:159–172. [PubMed]
  • Wright DD, Blackstone CD, Huganir RL, Ryugo DK. Immunocytochemical localization of the mGluR1 alpha metabotropic glutamate receptor in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of comparative neurology. 1996;364:729–745. [PubMed]
  • Yasuda R, Nimchinsky EA, Scheuss V, Pologruto TA, Oertner TG, Sabatini BL, Svoboda K. Imaging calcium concentration dynamics in small neuronal compartments. Sci STKE. 2004:pl5. [PubMed]
  • Young ED, Davis KA. Circuitry and function of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. In: Oertel D, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Integrative functions in the mammalian auditory pathways. NY: Springer; 2002. pp. 160–206.
  • Zhang S, Oertel D. Cartwheel and superficial stellate cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus of mice: intracellular recordings in slices. Journal of neurophysiology. 1993;69:1384–1397. [PubMed]
  • Zhao Y, Rubio ME, Tzounopoulos T. Distinct functional and anatomical architecture of the endocannabinoid system in the auditory brainstem. Journal of neurophysiology. 2009;101:2434–2446. [PubMed]
  • Zhou J, Shore S. Projections from the trigeminal nuclear complex to the cochlear nuclei: a retrograde and anterograde tracing study in the guinea pig. Journal of neuroscience research. 2004;78:901–907. [PubMed]
  • Zucker RS, Regehr WG. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:355–405. [PubMed]