PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3232183
NIHMSID: NIHMS306350

Risks of congenital malformations and perinatal events among infants exposed to calcium channel and beta-blockers during pregnancy

Robert L. Davis, MD, MPH,* David Eastman, BS, Heather McPhillips, MD, MPH, Marsha A. Raebel, PharmD, Susan E Andrade, ScD, David Smith, PhD, MHA, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, DSc, MPH, Sascha Dublin, MD, PhD, and Richard Platt, MD, MS, For the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research in Therapeutics

Abstract

Purpose

Calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers are widely used during pregnancy, but data on their safety for the developing infant is scarce. We used population-based data from 5 HMOs to study risks for perinatal complications and congenital defects among infants exposed in-utero.

Methods

We studied women older than 15 years delivering an infant between 1/1/96 to 12/31/00, who had been continuously enrolled with prescription drug coverage for >= one year prior to delivery. Information on prescription drug dispensings, inpatient and outpatient diagnoses and procedures was obtained from automated databases at each HMO.

Results

There were 584 full-term infants exposed during pregnancy to beta-blockers and 804 full-term infants exposed to calcium-channel blockers, and over 75,000 unexposed mother-infant pairs with >= 30 days follow-up. Infants exposed to beta-blockers in the third trimester of pregnancy had over three-fold increased risk for hypoglycemia (RR 3.1; 95% CI 2.2, 4.2) and an approximately two-fold increased risk for feeding problems (RR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3, 2.5). Infants exposed to calcium-channel blockers in the third trimester had an increased risk for seizures (RR 3.6 95% CI 1.3, 10.4). Chart review confirmed the majority of the exposed seizure and hypoglycemia cases. There were no increased risks for congenital anomalies among either group of infants, except for the category of upper alimentary tract anomalies; this increased risk was based on only two exposed cases.

Conclusions

Infants whose mothers receive beta-blockers are at increased risk for neonatal hypoglycemia, while those whose mothers take calcium-channel blockers are at increased risk for neonatal seizures.

Keywords: calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, pregnancy, perinatal, malformation, anomalies, prescription drug, drug safety

INTRODUCTION

Each year there are over four million births in the United States. While most pregnancies proceed to term, medical problems requiring care are common. According to a recent study of prescription drug use during pregnancy, almost two-thirds of all women delivering a live infant had been prescribed at least one drug (other than a vitamin or mineral supplement) during pregnancy1. Hypertension is the most common medical complication of pregnancy, and occurs in up to 2–3% of pregnancies2. The sequelae of hypertension during pregnancy include placental abruption, premature delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and intrauterine death.

Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and beta-blockers (BB) are effective for the treatment of hypertension during pregnancy. They are commonly used for hypertension (and other purposes) - by approximately 1.6% of women delivering a full-term infant, and 7% of women delivering a preterm infant - and are felt to be safe for the developing fetus37. The benefits of their use extend to both the mother and the infant, and serve to reduce the morbidity that would otherwise result from uncontrolled hypertension.

However, many of the cardiovascular drugs that are prescribed for a pregnant woman have the potential to cross the placenta and exert a pharmacologic or even teratogenic effect upon the fetus. Some antihypertensive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to have a demonstrated fetotoxic effect810. Use of ACE inhibitors has been found to increase the risk for both cardiovascular and central nervous system anomalies after first trimester exposure, or for a group of conditions including oligohydramnios, renal dysplasia, anuria, and renal failure after third trimester exposure8. Calcium channel blockers have not shown an increase in teratogenic risk in humans, although studies of high doses of calcium channel blockers administered to pregnant rats and rabbits have found an increased prevalence of cardiovascular and skeletal malformations (including digital and limb defects)1118. Among beta-blockers, intrauterine growth restriction, bradycardia and hypoglycemia have been found in a number of studies that evaluated their use for treatment of hypertension during pregnancy19,20. However, a number of other studies have failed to demonstrate an elevated risk for these outcomes, and overall beta blockers as a class are considered safe for the developing fetus, particularly in light of its positive impact on maternal health during pregnancy4,21.

Although use of such cardiovascular medications is widespread during pregnancy, in-depth data on their safety profile for the developing fetus remains relatively scarce. We have recently published a study from a cohort of more than 100,000 births from 1996–2000 in 5 large health maintenance organizations that assessed the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and tricyclic antidepressant use during pregnancy22. To address the safety of commonly used cardiovascular medications during pregnancy, we used this same population-based dataset to study the risks for perinatal complications and congenital defects among infants exposed in-utero to beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers.

METHODS

Setting

This study was carried out within the HMO Research Network’s Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (HMO CERTs) program. As this study’s design is the same as the one published previously on antidepressant use during pregnancy22, only a summary of the methods will be presented here.

The CERTs program is a AHRQ-funded national initiative to increase awareness of the benefits and risks of therapeutics through education and research23. Five integrated health care delivery systems from the HMO CERTs, with a combined population over 3 million members, participated in this study: Group Health Cooperative (Seattle, Washington); Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Boston, Massachusetts); Henry Ford Health System (Detroit, Michigan); Kaiser Permanente Colorado (Denver, Colorado); and Kaiser Permanente Northwest (Portland, Oregon). The health plans serve diverse populations, with the percent of African American members ranging from 2% to 24%, the percent of Hispanics ranging from < 1% to 16%, and the percent of Asian Americans ranging from <1% to 5% of health plan membership.

Each HMO’s Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Study design

This retrospective study was conducted using computerized health system databases, which include information on member enrollment, outpatient drug dispensing, and inpatient and outpatient diagnoses and procedures. We identified female members older than 15 years of age who were admitted to a community or HMO-owned hospital between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000 for delivery of an infant and who were continuously enrolled with prescription drug coverage for at least one year prior to admission. The maternal–infant linkage was accomplished using unique identifiers that have been previously used for epidemiologic studies of maternal–child pairs in these health systems. We limited our study to those infants that had a requisite follow-up of either 365 days for the evaluation of congenital anomalies, or 30 days for the evaluation of perinatal outcomes. There were a total of 99,419 pregnancies in the 5 participating HMOs, of which 87,407 were able to be linked to infants with at least 30 days of follow-up, a linkage rate of 88%.

As data were not available on the length of gestation in the automated databases, we evaluated prescription drug use with the assumption of a gestational age of 270 days for full term deliveries, including three 90-day trimesters of pregnancy. This same technique was used with our previously published studies using this database1,22,24,25.

Exposure assessment

We obtained information on outpatient use of antihypertensive medications from the pharmacy database files at each HMO. (During the time period covered by this study, the automated databases did not capture inpatient use of medications). Medications were categorized into either beta-blocker or calcium channel blockers; other antihypertensive medications were not evaluated because of relatively low usage. For comparison, we chose infants born to mothers who were not prescribed these specific medications at any time during pregnancy.

Outcomes

For assessment of congenital anomalies, we limited our analysis to infants with at least 365 days of follow-up. Inpatient (including birth hospitalization), outpatient, and emergency department databases were evaluated for diagnoses of any congenital anomalies of interest that were made in the first year of life. To assess perinatal events, we analyzed infants with at least 30 days of post-delivery follow-up and looked at diagnoses made during the birth hospitalization or in the outpatient setting, emergency department, or additional hospitalizations up through day 30 after birth.

In line with the screening nature of this study, we assessed outcomes via assigned ICD9 codes. We then performed medical record review for three categories of perinatal events where elevated risks were found after the initial analysis was completed: (i) newborn endocrine and metabolic disturbances, including hypoglycemia, following third trimester beta-blocker exposure; (ii) convulsions in the newborn following third trimester calcium-channel blocker exposure; and (iii) hematologic disorders of the newborn following third trimester calcium channel blocker exposure. Funding limitations precluded performing chart reviews to estimate the proportion of missed cases (false negatives).

Statistical analysis

We compared the risk among exposed infants to the risk among unexposed infants for each outcome, stratified by health system, maternal age, and birth season. Relative risks and confidence intervals unadjusted for multiple testing were calculated using stratified cumulative incidence tables. Statistical significance was defined as where the confidence interval excluded 1.0 and p <0.05. Relative risk estimates were only calculated for outcomes where there was at least one event among the exposed infants. All analyses were conducted using STATA v8. We studied risks for infants exposed during the first trimester of pregnancy to evaluate risk for congenital anomalies, and exposure during the third trimester to evaluate risk for perinatal events. Finally, we studied infants exposed at any time during the first through third trimesters of pregnancy to evaluate risk for preterm delivery.

RESULTS

After excluding mother-infant pairs for whom 30 days of post-delivery follow-up were not available, we identified a total of 584 fullterm infants exposed to beta-blockers at any time during pregnancy, and 804 fullterm infants exposed to calcium channel blockers at any time during pregnancy. There were over 75,000 mother-infant pairs unexposed to either BB or CCB with at least 30 days follow-up. After excluding infants for whom 365 days of follow-up were not available, we identified a total of 390 fullterm infants exposed to BBs at any time during pregnancy and 505 exposed to CCBs. The group with 365 days of follow-up was used to assess risk for congenital anomalies, while the group with 30 days of follow-up was used to assess risk for perinatal events.

The risks for congenital anomalies and perinatal events for infants exposed during pregnancy are shown in Tables 1 and and2.2. Of the fullterm infants exposed to BBs during pregnancy, a total of 188 infants were exposed during the first trimester and had 365 days of follow-up, and 405 infants were exposed during the third trimester and had 30 days of follow-up. Of the fullterm infants exposed to CCBs during pregnancy, 40 infants were exposed during the first trimester and had 365 days of follow-up, and 721 infants were exposed during the third trimester and had 30 days of follow-up. BB use during first trimester was not statistically significantly associated with an increased risk for congenital anomalies overall, or for any specific type of congenital anomaly. CCB use in the first trimester was associated with an increased risk for congenital anomalies of the upper alimentary tract, but this increased risk was based on only two exposed cases. The point estimate of the risk for one or more malformation was not elevated for CCBs (RR 0.96; 95%CI 0.47,1.97) or BBs (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.68, 1,40).

Table 1
Number and relative risks of congenital malformations among fullterm infants exposed to cardiovascular medications during the first trimester of pregnancy, compared to unexposed fullterm infants. All infants were followed for outcomes for 365 days after ...
Table 2
Number and relative risks of perinatal events among fullterm infants exposed to cardiovascular during the third trimester of pregnancy, compared to unexposed fullterm infants. All infants were followed for outcomes for 30 days after delivery.

With regards to conditions arising in the perinatal period there were elevated risks for endocrine disturbances including hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, feeding problems, and jaundice among infants exposed to BBs in the third trimester (Table 2). Among infants exposed to calcium channel blockers, there were increased risks for hematological disorders, jaundice, and neonatal convulsions (RR 3.61 95% CI 1.26, 10.37).

Chart review was performed on a total number of 119 infants. Among 68 charts requested for infants with hypoglycemia, 57 were abstracted (11 charts were not able to be obtained); of these, 44 were confirmed to have had the diagnosis of hypoglycemia in the birth hospital record (a confirmation rate of 77%). Of the 44 confirmed cases, 40 had at least one blood sugar <50 mg/dl recorded in the laboratory files. Fourteen of the 44 were born to mothers with either gestational diabetes (11) or pre-existing diabetes mellitus (3); the other 30 mothers had no evidence of preexisting diabetes. All 10 infants with convulsion had their medical records reviewed. A total of seven cases of convulsions were confirmed on record review, and three were not confirmed. Of the seven confirmed convulsions, six had a calcium level obtained, and one of the six had neonatal hypocalcemia (<7 mg/dl).

Finally, for the 41 infants with hematologic disorders, 40 medical records were obtained and 30 of the 40 cases were confirmed by record review. However, the diagnoses were not consistent among this group: 14 had polycythemia neonatorum, 14 had a newborn hemolytic disorder, 3 had neonatal hemorrhage, 4 had disseminated intravascular coagulation, 4 had thrombocytopenia, 2 had congenital anemia, and 9 had other conditions.

DISCUSSION

In this study of a cohort of approximately 100,000 pregnancies and over 1100 infants exposed to either beta blockers or calcium channel blockers, we found an apparent increase in risk for seizures among infants whose mothers were taking calcium channel blockers during pregnancy, and an increase risk for hypoglycemia among infants whose mothers were taking beta-blockers during pregnancy. It is important to note that these risks were measured only in the perinatal period; there was no attempt to measure risk for the longer term, or the long-term sequelae of either neonatal seizures or hypoglycemia.

There was no increase in risk for congenital anomalies among infants exposed to either calcium channel blockers or beta blockers. Additionally, for one category of risk that we did see in the screening phase of the analysis, hematologic disorders, we did not find evidence of any consistent serious disorder associated with this exposure.

Beta-blockers can cross the placenta and can exert physiologic effects in the infant, including an increase in the levels of insulin and a decrease in glucagon26,27 . Both of these actions lead to the potential for hypoglycemia in the infant. Hypoglycemia is a common metabolic problem among newborns, and in the majority of cases it is self-resolving and without long-term sequelae. A recent systematic review of neonatal hypoglycemia and subsequent neurodevelopment found substantial variation in studies that have studied this relationship28. If prolonged or severe, hypoglycemia can result in severe neurologic consequences as shown in one study of over 600 infants29. In particular, prolonged hypoglycemia (noted on at least 5 or more separate days) strongly influenced mental and motor neurodevelopment, and was associated with a 13 and 14 point reduction in mental and motor development, respectively, at 18 months of age. Additionally, the risk for cerebral palsy or developmental delay was increased 3.5 fold among infants with prolonged neonatal hypoglycemia. One drawback of our study is that it did not provide information on the duration of the hypoglycemia, and so we are not able to know if beta-blockers are associated with prolonged and/or severe hypoglycemia.

Like beta blockers, calcium channel blockers also can cross the placenta, and can lead to decreased intracellular calcium in the infant30,31. In both adults and children, calcium antagonist toxicity is associated with seizures32. In addition, hypocalcemia is a known cause of neonatal seizures, and the work-up of neonatal seizures typically includes checking a serum calcium level33. Neonatal seizures due to hypocalcemia are typically associated with endocrinologic abnormalities of either the newborn or the mother, such as parathyroid diseases or diabetes. Hypocalcemia is also seen in infants of diabetic mothers, and is more common, and more severe, with more severe maternal diabetes and glucose abnormalities34.

Neonatal seizures can be particularly serious, and may be associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes for the infant dependent upon the etiology of seizures33. Most neonatal seizures are caused by acute problems, such as meningitis or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy which, in and of themselves, are associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. According to the ‘Summary Proceedings from the Neurology Group on Neonatal Seizures’, seizures are the most important sign of acute neonatal encephalopathy35 and are an independent, and major, risk factor for death or subsequent neurologic disability. While neonatal seizures are often part of a group of symptoms indicating an underlying disease process, it is also felt that neonatal seizures may contribute, by themselves, to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. We did not collect information on the persistence of the seizures seen in this study and therefore cannot comment on their long-term effect.

Our study has a number of strengths. First, we collected information on prescribing during pregnancy from administrative datasets, and so this information was immune from recall bias that might arise from exposure assessments from parental interviews. Second, the cohort study design allowed us to assess the absolute risks resulting from medication exposures during pregnancy. Further, compared with case-control studies which typically have a more complete description of one or a few conditions, we evaluated a wide range of outcomes, both teratogenic and perinatal, providing a relatively complete picture of the safety of BB and CCB use during pregnancy.

An important limitation to our study is that we were not able to disentangle the effect of the drug from that of the underlying condition. Indeed, many of the conditions for which either BB or CCB are given may themselves place the infant under stress and increase the risk for some of the conditions studied here. Equally importantly is the potential for misclassification of one or more outcomes, which would likely bias our findings towards the null and would limit our ability to detect a real signal. Additionally, the administrative datasets that we used provided information on prescriptions, but not on whether the medication was actually taken by the mother. In a prior study, we found that 59% of pregnant women filled their prescriptions for antidepressants on two or more occasions, but we do not have similar data for the numbers of women refilling prescriptions for BB or CCB22. As such, care must be taken not to over-interpret our findings of the overall safety of BB and CCB use during pregnancy.

An additional limitation to our study is that the results might be subject to diagnostic bias, whereby clinicians might be more likely to note conditions in the infant suspected to be associated with the medications if they knew the mother had been exposed. Finally, our study lacked information on potential confounders, such as the women’s exposure to alcohol, cigarette smoking, and other substance abuse.

A new initiative known as the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program (MEPREP) has been recently launched, and is a collaboration among the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and researchers at 10 managed care organizations and Vanderbilt University36. Collectively, these 11 sites have health care information on over 1 million births covering the time period 2001–2007. Additional years’ data will be added over time. This initiative will address many of the limitations noted above, and is anticipated to have sufficient power to address questions such as the safety of medication use during critical periods of exposure for the infant.

The association seen here between calcium channel blockers and neonatal seizures has not been reported previously, while the association between beta blockers and hypoglycemia has, although not from a population-based perspective. These findings may impact care of the newborn whose mother was on either medication prior to delivery, and these rare potential side-effects must be weighed against the risks of hypertension in pregnancy, which can be dangerous both to the mother and the infant. Given the recent increased attention directed towards increasing data gathered on drug safety during pregnancy37, this study illustrates two drugs that might be merit further evaluation in even larger population settings.

Take-Home Messages

  • Fullterm infants with third trimester exposure to BBs were at increased risk for respiratory distress syndrome, endocrine and metabolic disturbances including hypoglycemia, perinatal jaundice, digestive system disorders and feeding problems.
  • Third trimester exposure to CCB was associated with an increased risk for neonatal convulsions and for perinatal jaundice.
  • Over three-quarters of the diagnoses of hypoglycemia and neonatal convulsions were confirmed after medical record review
  • Exposure to BBs did not increase risk for congenital anomalies. Exposure to CCBs raised the risk for one category of anomalies but this was based on only two exposed cases.

Acknowledgments

Supported by grant HS10391 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to The HMO Research Network’s Center for Education and Research in Therapeutics (CERT). Group Health Research Institute internal funds helped support data collection at that site.

Contributor Information

Robert L. Davis, Center for Health Research Southeast, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia.

David Eastman, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington.

Heather McPhillips, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Marsha A. Raebel, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado.

Susan E Andrade, Meyers Primary Care Institute-Fallon Healthcare System and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

David Smith, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.

Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan.

Sascha Dublin, Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

Richard Platt, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

References

1. Andrade SE, Gurwitz JH, et al. Prescription drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(2):398–407. [PubMed]
2. Sibai BM. Treatment of hypertension in pregnant women. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(4):257–265. [PubMed]
3. Lalkin A, Loebstein R, et al. Therapeutic approach to hypertension during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 1998;44:1245–1247. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Magee LA, Ornstein MP, et al. Fortnightly review: management of hypertension in pregnancy. BMJ. 1999;318(7194):1332–1336. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Rosenthal T, Oparil S. The effect of antihypertensive drugs on the fetus. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16(5):293–298. [PubMed]
6. Sibai BM. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):369–377. [PubMed]
7. Qasqas SA, McPherson C, et al. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapeutic considerations during pregnancy and lactation. Cardiol Rev. 2004;12(5):240–261. [PubMed]
8. Cooper WO, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2443–2451. [PubMed]
9. Friedman JM. ACE inhibitors and congenital anomalies. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(23):2498–2500. [PubMed]
10. Quan A. Fetopathy associated with exposure to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82(1):23–28. [PubMed]
11. Fukunishi K, Yokoi Y, et al. Effects of nifedipine on rat fetuses. Med. Consult. New Remed. 1980;17:2245–2256.
12. Cabov A, Palka E. Some effects of Cordipin (nifedipine) administered during pregnancy in rats. Teratology. 1984;29:21. [PubMed]
13. Yoshida T, Kanamori S, et al. Hyperphalangeal bones induced in rat pups by maternal treatment with nifedipine. Toxicol Lett. 1988;40(2):127–132. [PubMed]
14. Danielsson BR, Reiland S, et al. Digital defects induced by vasodilating agents: relationship to reduction in uteroplacental blood flow. Teratology. 1989;40(4):351–358. [PubMed]
15. Komai H, Redon D, et al. Effects of thiopental and halothane on spontaneous contractile activity induced in isolated ventricular muscles of the rabbit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35(5):373–379. [PubMed]
16. Danielsson BR, Danielson M, et al. Identical phalangeal defects induced by phenytoin and nifedipine suggest fetal hypoxia and vascular disruption behind phenytoin teratogenicity. Teratology. 1992;45(3):247–258. [PubMed]
17. Richichi J, Vasilenko P. The effects of nifedipine on pregnancy outcome and morphology of the placenta, uterus, and cervix during late pregnancy in the rat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(3):797–803. [PubMed]
18. Sorensen HT, Czeizel AE, et al. The risk of limb deficiencies and other congenital abnormalities in children exposed in utero to calcium channel blockers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(5):397–401. [PubMed]
19. Lydakis C, Lip GY, et al. Atenolol and fetal growth in pregnancies complicated by hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12(6):541–547. [PubMed]
20. Magee LA, Duley L. Oral beta-blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3:CD002863. [PubMed]
21. Easterling TR, Brateng D, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia: a randomized trial of atenolol in hyperdynamic patients before onset of hypertension. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):725–733. [PubMed]
22. Davis RL, Rubanowice D, et al. Risks of congenital malformations and perinatal events among infants exposed to antidepressant medications during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16(10):1086–1094. [PubMed]
23. Platt R, Davis R, et al. Multicenter epidemiologic and health services research on therapeutics in the HMO Research Network CERT. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 2001;10(5):373–377. [PubMed]
24. Raebel MA, Ellis JL, et al. Evaluation of gestational age and admission date assumptions used to determine prenatal drug exposure from administrative data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(12):829–836. [PubMed]
25. Andrade SE, Raebel MA, et al. Use of prescription medications with a potential for fetal harm among pregnant women. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15(8):546–554. [PubMed]
26. Bricelj V. Use of Adrenergic Beta-Blockers in Pregnancy. Heart Views. 1999;1(4):130–132.
27. Langdon D, Stanley C. Pediatric Endocrinology. M. A. Sperling, Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. Hypoglycemia in the Infant and Child; p. 889.
28. Boluyt N, van Kempen A, et al. Neurodevelopment after neonatal hypoglycemia: a systematic review and design of an optimal future study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2231–2243. [PubMed]
29. Lucas A, Morley R, et al. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of moderate neonatal hypoglycaemia. BMJ. 1988;297(6659):1304–1308. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Zakhari S. Mechanism of action of calcium antagonists on myocardial and smooth muscle membranes. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1986;12(9–10):817–829. [PubMed]
31. Leonardi MR, Hankins GD. What's new in tocolytics. Clin Perinatol. 1992;19(2):367–384. [PubMed]
32. Lovejoy F, Linden C. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Isselbacher, Braunwald, Wilsonet al, McGraw Hill; 1994. Acute Poison and Drug Overdose; p. 2450.
33. Novotny E. Principles and Practice of Pediatrics. F. A. Oski. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1994. Neonatal Seizures; pp. 357–362.
34. Karlsson K, Kjellmer I. The outcome of diabetic pregnancies in relation to the mother's blood sugar level. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112(2):213–220. [PubMed]
35. Clancy RR. Summary proceedings from the neurology group on neonatal seizures. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3 Pt 2):S23–S27. [PubMed]
36. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA, Health organizations to study safety of medications taken during pregnancy. 2009 December 30; Retrieved from www.fda.gov ( www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2009/ucm195934.htm)
37. Feibus KB. FDA’s proposed rule for pregnancy and lactation labeling: improving maternal child health through well-informed medicine use. J Med Toxicol. 2008;4(4):284–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed]