PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2011; 6(12): e28261.
Published online Dec 2, 2011. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0028261
PMCID: PMC3229553
Cup Blocks the Precocious Activation of the Orb Autoregulatory Loop
Li Chin Wong*¤ and Paul Schedl
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
Christos Samakovlis, Editor
Stockholm University, Sweden
* E-mail: lichin.wong/at/nyumc.org
Conceived and designed the experiments: LCW PS. Performed the experiments: LCW PS. Analyzed the data: LCW PS. Wrote the paper: LCW PS.
¤Current address: Smilow Neuroscience Program, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
Received August 30, 2011; Accepted November 4, 2011.
Translational regulation of localized mRNAs is essential for patterning and axes determination in many organisms. In the Drosophila ovary, the germline-specific Orb protein mediates the translational activation of a variety of mRNAs localized in the oocyte. One of the Orb target mRNAs is orb itself, and this autoregulatory activity ensures that Orb proteins specifically accumulate in the developing oocyte. Orb is an RNA-binding protein and is a member of the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding (CPEB) protein family. We report here that Cup forms a complex in vivo with Orb. We also show that cup negatively regulates orb and is required to block the precocious activation of the orb positive autoregulatory loop. In cup mutant ovaries, high levels of Orb accumulate in the nurse cells, leading to what appears to be a failure in oocyte specification as a number of oocyte markers inappropriately accumulate in nurse cells. In addition, while orb mRNA is mislocalized and destabilized, a longer poly(A) tail is maintained than in wild type ovaries. Analysis of Orb phosphoisoforms reveals that loss of cup leads to the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated Orb, suggesting that an important function of cup in orb-dependent mRNA localization pathways is to impede Orb activation.
In eukaryotic cells, cytoplasmic polyadenylation is used to activate the on-site translation of localized mRNAs. Polyadenylation is thought to depend upon two key elements in the 3′ UTR of the mRNA. The first is the AAUAAA motif, which is bound by the cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) while the second is the U-rich cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE) which is bound by the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein (CPEB) [1], [2]. The evolutionarily conserved CPEBs are RNA-recognition motif (RRM)-type RNA-binding proteins and they have been found in species ranging from nematodes to humans. One of the founding members of the CPEB family is the Drosophila germline-specific protein Orb [3]. Orb plays a critical role in the development of the female germline and is required for mRNA localization and translational regulation throughout much of oogenesis [4], [5].
Phenotypic analysis of strong orb alleles indicates that the formation of the 16-cell cyst, the specification of the oocyte and the proper expression of the TGF-α signaling molecule Gurken (Grk) at the posterior of pre-vitellogenic egg chambers requires orb activity [5][7]. In the hypomorphic allele orbmel, these early steps in oogenesis appear normal; however, the specification of both the anterior-posterior (AP) and dorsal ventral (DV) polarity axes in vitellogenic egg chambers is disrupted. Orb protein is thought to function in AP axis specification by binding to oskar (osk) mRNA after it is localized to the posterior pole of the oocyte and activating its translation by a mechanism involving polyadenylation [4], [8], [9]. In the DV polarity pathway, Orb is required for the localized translation of grk mRNA at the dorsal-anterior corner of the oocyte. In orbmel ovaries, grk mRNA is mislocalized and little or no Grk protein is produced. Like other mutations that disrupt grk signaling, orbmel eggs have ventralized chorions that either have fused or lack dorsal respiratory appendages [4], [7].
Another Orb regulatory target is its own mRNA. Orb is required to localize orb mRNAs to sites in the oocyte cortex and to promote their on-site translation. As is the case for osk mRNA, it is thought to act by binding to target sequences in the orb 3′ UTR and activating polyadenylation [10]. This positive autoregulatory activity ensures that high levels of Orb specifically accumulate in the oocyte, which is the compartment that requires orb activity. Since orb mRNA is synthesized in the nurse cells, and must be transported through the nurse cells into the oocyte and then localized within the oocyte to the cortex, there must be mechanisms in place that prevent the precocious activation of the orb positive autoregulatory loop. Previous studies have shown that the Drosophila Fragile X mental retardation protein dFMR1 downregulates orb mRNA translation in nurse cells [11]; however, the effects of dfmr1 mutations on Orb protein expression, and on oogenesis in general, are relatively modest and it seems likely that other factors may play more central roles in blocking the premature activation of the orb positive autoregulatory loop.
One candidate for a gene that prevents the precocious activation of the orb positive autoregulatory loop is fs(2)cup (cup). cup was discovered in a screen for female sterile mutations [12]. Strong loss-of-function Class I alleles arrest oogenesis prior to the onset of vitellogenesis and they accumulate many small, round and abnormal-looking egg chambers [13]. Moderate Class II alleles progress farther; the egg chambers appear to take up yolk and have a more elongated shape. Oogenesis in Class III alleles is relatively normal up until stage 9–10 when the oocyte stops growing and this gives rise to cup-like chorions. The Cup protein has been shown to function as a translational repressor of several mRNAs including one of the known orb targets, osk [14], [15]. While the mechanism of repression is not fully understood, Cup has been shown to interact directly with three other translation factors, the cap-binding initiation factor eIF4e, and the RRM-type RNA-binding proteins Bruno and Smaug [15][17].
These interactions involve different domains of the Cup protein. For example, Cup-eIF4E interactions are mediated by a canonical and a non-canonical eIF4E binding motif in the Cup N-terminus, while the C-terminal end of the Cup protein mediates interactions with Bruno [15][17]. Though Cup has no known RNA binding activity, protein-protein interactions with Bruno (or Smaug) would function to recruit Cup to mRNAs like osk and orb that contain sequence motifs recognized by the Bruno protein. Cup is thought to inhibit the translation of these mRNAs by binding to eIF4E and sequestering it from interacting with eIF4G [15][17]. This prevents the assembly of the eIF4F initiation complex (consisting of eIF4A, eIF4E and eIF4G) and the loading of the 40S ribosomal subunit at the 5′ end of the mRNA [16][18]. Consistent with this model, the translation of osk mRNA is prematurely upregulated in several cup hypomorphic mutant combinations and Osk protein can be detected in stage 6–7 egg chambers [14], [15]. Moreover, in older mutant chambers, translation appears to be activated at the anterior of the oocyte instead of the posterior. Further supporting this model, premature activation of osk mRNA translation is also observed in a cup mutant, cupΔ212, which lacks the canonical high affinity eIF4E binding motif [15]. Interestingly, however, though the interaction of the mutant CupΔ212 protein with eIF4E is expected to be compromised, it is only a very weak Class III allele. This observation suggests that the regulatory activities of cup during oogenesis are likely to include other functions besides sequestering the eIF4E translation factor.
In this paper, we present evidence that one of the other functions of the cup gene is to prevent the premature activation of the orb positive autoregulatory loop. In wild type ovaries, the orb autoregulatory loop is activated in the oocyte ensuring that high levels of Orb protein accumulate in the compartment where its activity is required. In contrast, in cup mutants the autoregulatory appears to be precociously activated and high levels of Orb protein accumulate in the nurse cells. Our data suggest that Cup employs at least two different though likely overlapping mechanisms to prevent the premature activation of the orb autoregulatory loop. The first is to limit the poly(A) tail length of orb mRNAs. In cup mutants orb mRNAs have longer poly(A) tails than in wild type. The second is to limit the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated (activated) Orb protein isoforms. In wild type ovaries, there are two Orb isoform populations, hypo- and hyperphosphorylated, that differ in the extent of phosphorylation and in their activity [19]. Most of the Orb protein in wild type ovaries is hypophosphorylated. In contrast, in cup ovaries there is a shift in the isoform distribution and most the Orb protein is hyperphosphorylated. In addition to these effects on orb expression and post-translational modifications, we find that cup is required for the proper localization and stability of orb mRNA.
Cup associates with Orb in vivo
To identify components of the machinery that regulates Orb activity or localization, we searched for proteins that associate with Orb in vivo. For this purpose, we tested candidate proteins that were detected in a previous mass spectrometry analysis on Orb- immunoprecipitated wild type ovary extracts [19]. To enrich for proteins that are associated with Orb because they are in the same protein complexes rather than being linked together via an RNA bridge, we immunoprecipitated in the presence of RNase A. The proteins recovered from both the Orb and Dorsal immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by MudPIT, a mass spectrometry technology used for identifying proteins in complex mixtures ([19]; see also [11]). Altogether, ~170 proteins were detected in Orb but not Dorsal immunoprecipitates. Proteins that were only found in Orb immunoprecipitates include over 30 ribosomal proteins, PABP, the Drosophila Gld2-homolog Wisp, five predicted RNA helicases, multiple RNA binding proteins, components of the siRNA machinery and proteins involved in decapping and RNA turnover like Me31B, Trailer Hitch, Not4, Enhancer of decapping and Bicaudal-C. There were also several proteins (e.g., Encore, Didum, Ovarian tumor and Oskar) implicated in mRNA localization in Drosophila ovaries. We also found Cup and one of its known partners, the initiation factor eIF4E [15].
To confirm the physical association between Cup and Orb, we immunoprecipitated ovarian extracts with either Cup or Orb antibodies and then analyzed the immunoprecipitates by Western blotting. Orb, but not HA antibody is able to pull-down Cup protein (Fig. 1A). The total amount of lysate, which was used in the pull-down, and then loaded in the IP lane, was approximately ten-fold greater than the lysate which was loaded in the extract lane. Thus, only about 10% of the Cup protein is pulled down by Orb antibody. While IP efficiency could account for this difference, another factor that is likely to be important is that Orb protein is largely restricted to the oocyte. By contrast, Keyes and Spradling [13] have shown that while Cup is somewhat enriched in the oocyte especially in early stages of oogenesis, there are nevertheless substantial amounts of Cup protein in nurse cells.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Cup associates with Orb in vivo and affects the phosphorylation status of Orb.
In the converse experiment, we found that Cup antibody co-immunoprecipitates Orb protein (Fig. 1B). This association also does not depend upon an RNA bridge as RNase A treatment does not disrupt the Cup-Orb association. In fact, the amount of Orb pulled down in Cup immunoprecipitates seems to be greater when RNAse is present during the immunoprecipitation, compared to when RNAse is not present. These findings may indicate that the epitopes recognized by the Cup antibodies are occluded in native Orb-Cup complexes that contain mRNAs (and in some cases polyribosomes; [19]). When these complexes are treated with RNase, they may rearrange or lose factors that prevent immunoprecipitation of Orb with Cup antibodies.
cup negatively regulates orb
To determine if the physical association between orb and cup is functionally important, we tested for genetic interactions. orb is weakly haploinsufficient for its activity in the establishment of DV polarity in the developing egg chamber, and 5–10% of the eggs laid by females heterozygous for the null allele orb343 have ventralized chorions due to a defect in the production of the Grk ligand. It is possible to exacerbate this haploinsufficiency by introducing a dominant negative transgene HD19G. HD19G expresses an hybrid mRNA that contains β-galactosidase protein coding sequence fused to the 3′ UTR of orb mRNA [10]. The orb 3′ UTR in the chimeric mRNA competes with the 3′ UTR of the endogenous orb mRNA for Orb protein binding. This interferes with orb autoregulation and downregulates Orb protein expression. When this transgene is combined with the orb null allele, orb343, 20–30% of the eggs laid by transgene-heterozygous mutant females are ventralized. The somewhat higher frequency of DV defects in the HD19G orb343/+ background as compared to orb343/+ is useful in that it allows a more reliable detection of mutations that dominantly suppress the DV polarity defects induced by compromising orb activity. It is expected that dominant suppressors will correspond to genes that function to repress or reduce orb activity and/or grk signaling. In contrast, mutations that dominantly enhance the HD19G orb343/+ DV polarity defects are expected to correspond to genes that are required to promote orb activity and/or grk signaling.
We generated females trans-heterozygous for a recombinant HD19G orb343 chromosome and various cup mutant alleles by crossing HD19G orb343/TM3Ser females and cup/CyO males to test for genetic interactions. Using this strategy, we analyzed 5 different cup alleles, cup1, cup3, cup6, cup8, and cup1355 [12], [13]. cup3, cup6 and cup8 are strong loss-of-function mutations and these Class I alleles exhibit a pre-vitellogenesis oogenesis arrest. cup1 is a Class II allele and ovarian development arrests around stage 9. Finally, cup1355, which has a P-element insertion in the 5′ UTR that downregulates its expression, is a Class III allele and arrests during vitellogenesis.
As illustrated in Fig. 2 (and Table S1), we found that the DV polarity defects in eggs produced by HD19G orb343/+ females can be suppressed by reducing cup activity. At 25°C, the frequency of DV defects in eggs from HD19G orb343/+; cup/+ females of severe alleles is, with one exception (cup3), about half that seen for HD19G orb343/+ females. The suppression is even more pronounced at 18°C. At this temperature, close to 30% of the eggs laid by HD19G orb343/+ females are ventralized while in the cup trans-heterozygotes the frequency of egg shell polarity defects drops to less than 10%.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cup negatively regulates orb.
In a separate experiment (not shown) we also tested the very weak Class III allele, cupΔ212, which lacks the canonical eIF4E interaction domain. Unlike stronger cup alleles, which arrest oogenesis and can substantially alter the pattern of orb expression (see below), oogenesis is comparatively normal in cupΔ212 and defective eggs are produced [15]. This allele had, at most, only a modest effect on the frequency of ventralized eggs produced by HD19G orb343/+ females. Thus, the canonical eIF4E interaction domain is unlikely to be critical for genetic interactions between cup and orb at least in the DV polarity pathway.
Orb protein levels are altered in cup ovaries
The genetic interactions described above suggest that in addition to their physical association, there may also be a functional relationship between cup and orb. Moreover, given what is already known about the regulatory activities of the Cup protein in other contexts [14][16], one plausible explanation for the genetic interactions is that cup negatively regulates orb expression and/or activity. In this case, we would expect to find that Orb protein levels are increased in cup mutant ovaries. To test this prediction, we probed Western blots of ovary extracts prepared from female homozygous mutants for three different cup alleles, cup8, cup3 and cup1355 with Orb antibodies. We anticipated that Orb levels would be elevated in the mutants if cup functions as a “general” negative regulator of orb activity (because of Orb autoregulation), and that in this case the effects on Orb accumulation should be proportional to the strength of the cup allele. However, the results were anomalous (Fig. 3). Instead of having the highest levels, the amount of Orb protein in the strongest mutant, cup8, was actually less than in wild type. In contrast, the amount of Orb protein in the weaker Class I allele cup3, and in the Class III allele, cup1355, was greater than wild type. The reason for the unusual effects of the cup mutations became apparent when we examined the pattern of Orb protein accumulation in ovaries from the different mutants using confocal microscopy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Orb protein levels are altered in cup mutant ovaries.
Orb is mislocalized and misexpressed in cup ovaries
In wild type ovaries, Orb protein can first be readily detected in the germarium in newly formed 16-cell cysts. Though Orb is found in all 16 cells, it preferentially accumulates in one or only a small subset of these cells (arrowhead in Fig. 4A; see also [5]). The pattern of Orb protein localization then begins to refine and by the time the cells in the cyst rearrange and the oocyte moves to the posterior pole of the egg chamber, much of the Orb protein in the chamber is concentrated in the oocyte (arrow in Fig. 4A) while the nurse cells have considerably lower levels of Orb protein. Often a gradient of protein can be seen with the highest levels of Orb in the nurse cells closest to the oocyte. In slightly older chambers (* and<in Fig. 4A and arrow Fig. 4B′), Orb protein localizes to the posterior pole of the oocyte, while there are only very low levels of protein in the nurse cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Orb is misexpressed in cup ovaries.
A very different pattern of accumulation is evident in cup8 ovaries. In the germarium, Orb does not concentrate into a single cell. Instead, high levels of protein are found in nearly every cell in the 16-cell cysts (Fig. 4C). High levels of largely unlocalized Orb protein typically persist in the cup8 chambers after they exit the germarium and begin to “mature”. This can be seen in the pair of chambers shown in Fig. 4D. Most cells in these two chambers have high levels of Orb and it is not possible to determine which cell is the “oocyte” based on the Orb localization pattern. In other mutant chambers (see Fig. 4E), Orb becomes concentrated in 2–4 cells; however, even in these chambers it is often difficult to identify the oocyte. There are also chambers that appear (based on the concentration of Orb in a single cell) to have a properly “determined” oocyte; however, instead of being located at the posterior of the chamber, it is in the center or off to the side (Fig. S1). These findings argue that there are abnormalities in oocyte specification and/or maintenance of oocyte identity in cup8 ovaries. Consistent with this conclusion, we find that another marker of oocyte identity, Encore [20], is also not properly localized in many cup8 egg chambers. Figure S1 shows cup8 chambers in which both Encore and Orb are enriched in several cells instead of a single cell.
While Orb protein levels in the germarium and in most early chambers appear to be considerably higher than in wild type (judging from the relative intensity of staining in wild type and cup chambers and from the fact that most of the germ cells in mutant chambers have substantial amounts of Orb), these high levels of protein do not persist. Instead, we find that Orb levels begin to drop as the chambers age and in older chambers (based on their location in the string of chambers) there is often little or no Orb present (chamber on right in Fig. 4E). However, the transition from high to little or no Orb does not always follow this time course, and we also observe ovarioles that have one or more older chambers with high levels of Orb and a younger chamber with little or no Orb. The presence of many chambers that have little or no Orb, likely explains why we observed a decrease instead of an increase in Orb protein levels in Western blots of cup8 ovaries.
The oogenesis defects evident in the weaker Class I allele, cup3, are less severe than in cup8. Like cup8, the level of Orb protein in cup3 chambers appears to be considerably higher than normal in the germarium (arrow in Fig. 4H) and in newly pinched-off chambers. Also like cup8, Orb protein is usually not restricted to a single cell (the presumptive “oocyte”), but instead is distributed at approximately the same level in many if not all of the germ cells in the chamber (arrowhead in Fig. 4F and H). In addition to excess Orb in nurse cell cytoplasm, there are often prominent rings of Orb protein around the nurse cell nuclei (see * in Fig. 4F). While similar rings of Orb can be detected in wild type ovaries [11], they are only observed in overexposed images. Interestingly, many proteins involved in mRNA transport including Cup [13] concentrate in rings around the nurse cell nuclei and these rings are thought to correspond to the sites of assembly of silenced mRNP complexes [21].
In cup8 the level of Orb protein drops as the egg chambers age. While older chambers with reduced levels of Orb protein are seen in cup3 ovarioles (arrows in Fig.4F, F′), we also find many older chambers that retain higher than normal levels of Orb protein. In some cases, most of the protein is concentrated in a single cell, which presumably corresponds to the oocyte. The presumptive oocyte in Fig. 4I (see arrow) has an unusual triangular shape. In other chambers, several cells located near the posterior have high levels of Orb (see arrowheads in 4I and arrows in 4J). In these chambers the overall level of Orb protein in the nurse cells also appears to be higher than in wild type. The presence of many older chambers in which Orb levels remain elevated likely explains why much greater amounts of Orb are detected in Western blots of cup3 ovaries than in cup8 ovaries.
While the oocyte appears to be mis-specified in cup8 or (to a lesser extent) cup3 chambers, this problem is usually not observed in the Class III cup1355 mutant where the pattern of Orb accumulation appears to be comparatively normal in early stages 1–5 cup1355 chambers (Fig. 4K). However, defects become apparent around stages 6–7. The oocyte in these chambers can have an abnormal shape and is often smaller than normal. Although Orb is enriched in the cup1355 oocyte, the relative level of protein appears to be reduced compared to wild type oocytes. By contrast, the nurse cells of these older chambers have higher levels of Orb than wild type nurse cells (Fig. 4L) and Orb can be observed around the nurse cell nuclei or in clumps in the nurse cell cytoplasm (see arrows in L). Orb protein clumps are also seen in the nurse cell cytoplasm of cup3 (see * in I). These findings indicate that orb mRNA is inappropriately translated in the nurse cells beginning during mid-oogenesis (stages 6–7) in cup1355 mutant ovarioles. Interestingly, precocious expression of Osk is observed around the same time in other Class III cup mutants [15].
orb mRNA is mislocalized in cup mutants
To further investigate the effects of cup mutations on orb, we examined the pattern of orb mRNA accumulation in cup ovaries. In wild type ovaries, orb mRNA localizes preferentially to the oocyte soon after the 16-cell cyst is formed [3]. In pre-vitellogenic stages, most of the message is concentrated at the posterior pole of the oocyte, while after the onset of vitellogenesis, the message re-localizes along the anterior margin (Fig. 5A and 5B). In both cup8 and cup3 ovaries, orb message is distributed more or less uniformly in the germ cells of the egg chamber; however, many of these chambers have a single cell which has somewhat higher levels of mRNA (arrows in Fig. 5D, 5F and 5G) and this cell would presumably correspond to the “oocyte.” While this presumptive oocyte is usually near the posterior of the chamber in cup3, it can be in the center or off to one side in cup8 chambers (panel D). Besides mislocalized mRNA, there are also chambers that have little or no orb message (see arrowheads in panel C). As was seen for Orb protein, the distribution of orb mRNA in cup1355 more closely resembles wild type than either of the stronger alleles (panel H). However, even in this mutant the relative proportion of message in the nurse cells appears higher than in wild type chambers of similar stages (panel I).
Figure 5
Figure 5
orb mRNA is mislocalized in cup mutants.
These findings indicate that the cup activity is required not only to regulate the translation of orb mRNA but also for its proper localization. In addition, since many chambers (especially in the stronger alleles) have little orb mRNA, it would appear that cup is required either for the synthesis of orb mRNA, or to stabilize its accumulation. The latter possibility is supported by recent studies using a tissue culture system by Igreja and Izaurralde [22] who showed that Cup stabilizes reporter mRNAs when tethered to them. To determine if cup activity is also required for the normal accumulation of orb mRNA, we used quantitative real-time PCR. Compared to a normalized wild type value of 1.0 (for pre-vitellogenic egg chambers) the level of orb mRNA in cup8, cup3 and cup1355 mutant ovaries is 0.28, 0.32 and 0.32 respectively (see Experimental Procedures). These results would be consistent with the tissue culture experiments and would argue that cup is also required for orb mRNA stability.
osk mRNA levels are also decreased in cup mutants
Previous studies have shown that, like orb mRNA, one of the other known Orb regulatory targets, osk mRNA, is mislocalized and prematurely translated in cup ovaries [14], [15]. We wondered whether osk mRNA is also reduced in level when cup activity is compromised. To address this question, we used quantitative RT-PCR to estimate the relative abundance of osk mRNA in the three cup mutants. Figure 6A shows that there is less osk mRNA in the cup mutants than in wild type and that the extent of the reduction roughly corresponds to the severity of the allele. For example, cup8, the most severe mutant had approximately 22% of the osk mRNA found in wild type ovaries. Since the amount of Osk protein detected in Western blots of extracts from the three cup mutants is close to that found in wild type (pre-vitellogenic) chambers (see Fig. 6B), this would imply that more Osk is being expressed from less mRNA in the cup mutants (Fig. 6C).
Figure 6
Figure 6
osk mRNA is reduced in cup mutants while Osk protein levels remain the same as in wild type.
orb poly(A) tails are elongated in cup mutants
The findings described in the previous sections indicate that Orb protein is precociously and/or overexpressed in cup mutant ovaries. Since orb mRNA levels are also reduced, it would appear that they are translated more efficiently in the cup mutants. One mechanism that could account for a general increase in translational efficiency would be an increase in the average poly(A) tail length [23]. This idea is supported by the finding that Cup protein recruits components of the deadenylation machinery to target mRNAs [22]. According to this model, Cup would normally bind to newly synthesized orb mRNAs in nurse cells and promote their deadenylation. This would ensure that orb mRNAs remained repressed until they are localized in the oocyte. In cup mutants, orb mRNAs would have elongated poly(A) tails and this would increase their translational efficiency. A prediction of this model is that the poly(A) tails of orb mRNAs will be elongated in cup mutant ovaries. To determine whether this is true, we measured the lengths of orb mRNA poly(A) tails in wild type, cup8 and cup3 ovaries using the ligation-mediated poly(A)-tail assay [24]. We find that there is a shift in the distribution of orb mRNA poly(A) tails towards longer tails in both cup8 and cup3 ovaries (Fig. 7). A smaller shift towards longer poly(A) tails was also observed for cup1335 using the anchored poly(A)-tail assay (Fig. S2) [24].
Figure 7
Figure 7
The poly(A) tails of orb in cup8 and cup3 mutants are elongated compared to wild type.
Hyperphosphorylated Orb accumulates in cup ovaries
The findings described above indicate that orb mRNAs in cup ovaries have elongated poly(A) tails. While this would be expected to increase their translational efficiency [23], it is not clear that this would be sufficient in itself to account for the precocious expression of Orb protein in nurse cells, especially like that seen in the two stronger cup alleles. The abnormally high levels of Orb protein seen in the nurse cells suggests that the orb autoregulatory loop is also prematurely activated in the cup mutants. We've previously shown that orb activity is regulated, at least in part, by phosphorylation and that phosphorylation depends upon Casein Kinase II (CK2) [19]. In wild type ovaries there are two populations of Orb protein, the hypophosphorylated and hyperphosphorylated populations, both of which consist of several distinct phosphoisoforms. In females that are partially compromised for ck2 activity, there is a shift in the orb phosphoisoform profile towards the hypophosphorylated isoforms. Correlated with this shift, we find that orb functioning in both autoregulation and in grk signaling is disrupted. The two phosphoisoform populations are also found in quite distinct protein complexes that likely to differ in their activities. The hypophosphorylated proteins are in slowly sedimenting complexes and are associated with the translational Bruno repressor [18]. Bruno repressor also interacts directly with Cup and this interaction is important for Cup-mediated repression [15]. While the complexes containing hypophosphorylated isoforms appear to be involved in repression, the hyperphosphorylated isoforms are associated with complexes likely involved in translational activation. The hyperphosphorylated isoforms co-sediment with poly-ribosomes and are associated with the polyA polymerase Wisp which is thought to promote mRNA activation [25], [26]. Hence, one mechanism that could lead to the inappropriate activation of the orb autoregulatory loop would be to upregulate Orb phosphorylation.
To test whether cup affects the Orb phosphorylation status, we separated the hypo- and hyperphosphorylated Orb isoforms in wild type and cup mutant ovaries on SDS-PAGE gels. Since cup ovaries arrest early in oogenesis, we compared the Orb protein in cup ovaries with wild type ovaries containing only pre-vitellogenic stages. As shown in Fig. 8, we observed an increase in the relative abundance of the hyperphosphorylated Orb isoforms in the three cup mutants. In wild type ovaries, the rapidly migrating lower isoform is always more abundant than the upper isoform (Fig. 8 and [19]) and the average ratio of upper to lower isoforms is 0.77. This ratio is approximately the same for extracts of ovaries containing all stages, and extracts prepared from young females that contain only pre-vitellogenic stages. In cup ovaries, we find that there is a consistent increase in the relative level of the upper isoform. As illustrated in Fig. 8, the average ratio of upper (hyperphosphorylated) to lower (hypophosphorylated) isoforms in cup8 is 1.7. The average for cup3 in three experiments was 1.2, while for cup1355 it was 1.1. Though not as dramatic, we also observed an increase in the ratio of upper to lower isoforms when HD19G orb343/+females are trans-heterozygous for these three cup alleles.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The ratio of the upper and lower Orb isoforms is altered in cup ovaries.
Previous studies have shown that an autoregulatory mechanism is required to promote the accumulation of Orb protein in the oocyte of developing egg chambers [10]. Orb has two key activities in this autoregulatory loop. First, it functions in the localization of orb mRNA within the oocyte by anchoring the message to the oocyte cortex. Second, once orb mRNA is localized to the cortex, Orb promotes its on-site translation. In order to ensure that Orb protein accumulates at the oocyte cortex rather than elsewhere in the oocyte or in the nurse cells, it is block the activation of the autoregulatory loop until orb mRNA is properly localized. This means that there must be mechanisms in place to prevent not only the premature translation of orb mRNA while it is being transported from its site of synthesis in the nurse cells to oocyte cortex but also to block the precocious activation of the autoregulatory loop.
One factor that is known to be important in repressing the translation of orb mRNA is the Drosophila fragile X protein dFMR1 [11]. In dfmr1 mutants, the translation of orb mRNA is upregulated and markedly higher levels of Orb are observed in mutant ovaries. However, while the total amount of Orb protein is elevated, its overall distribution in the egg chamber closely resembles that seen in wild type; the protein is concentrated in the oocyte, with only low levels in nurse cells. Moreover, although abnormal egg chambers are observed in dfmr1 ovaries, they are relatively infrequent, and even in these chambers Orb concentrates in the presumptive oocyte. These findings suggest that dFMR1 functions as a general repressor of orb mRNA translation, but is not directly involved in preventing the precocious or inappropriate activation of the orb positive autoregulatory loop.
The studies reported here indicate that the cup gene also negatively regulates orb mRNA translation; however, it would appear to play a much more central role in controlling the orb positive autoregulatory loop than dfmr1. Several lines of evidence support this idea. The first evidence originates from genetic interactions studies between cup and orb. As would be predicted for a negative regulator, cup mutations dominantly suppress the DV polarity defects of eggs produced by females that have reduced orb activity. The second evidence is the pattern of Orb protein accumulation in cup mutant ovaries. In both of the strong cup alleles examined, Orb is precociously expressed in the nurse cells and high levels of Orb protein accumulate throughout much of the chamber. While Orb upregulation in dfmr1 does not alter the relative partitioning of the protein into the nurse cell and oocyte compartments, this is not the case for the two Class I cup alleles. In fact, because high levels of Orb accumulate in multiple cells in the mutant chambers, it is often difficult to determine which cell corresponds to the oocyte based on the partitioning of the Orb protein. While the pattern of Orb accumulation in the Class III allele, cup1355, is relatively normal up till stage 5 or 6, orb mRNA appears to be precociously translated in stage 6–7 and older chambers and we detected elevated levels of Orb in the nurse cells. Significantly, studies in other laboratories have shown that like orb, osk mRNA is precociously translated in cup mutant ovaries [14][17]. Thirdly, the overall level of Orb protein is elevated compared to wild type in the two weaker cup alleles that were examined. While Orb levels are unexpectedly reduced in the strongest allele, cup8, our confocal analysis indicates that this is likely due to the fact Orb disappears from the mutant chambers as they age. Importantly, in the germarium, and in very young chambers, Orb levels (as detected by antibody staining) in cup8 appear to be a good deal higher than in wild type. Fourth, while Orb protein levels are elevated, orb mRNAs levels are reduced in cup mutants compared to wild type. Since a similar reduction is observed for osk mRNA, it would appear that cup activity is needed either directly or indirectly to ensure the stability of at least two localized mRNAs. These unexpected effects of cup on mRNA stability would be consistent with recent studies in tissue culture cells, which have shown that tethering Cup protein to a reporter mRNAs stabilizes the mRNA even as it represses translation [22]. Finally, the idea that the orb autoregulatory loop is inappropriately activated is further supported by the finding that there is a shift in the orb mRNA poly(A) profile towards longer poly(A) tails in cup mutants.
The abnormal pattern of Orb protein accumulation in the two strong cup alleles also suggests that there may be problems in the specification or maintenance of oocyte identity. This possibility is supported by the fact that two other oocyte markers, Encore and orb mRNA, are also not properly localized. However, since we do see chambers in which these oocyte markers appear to be more highly concentrated in the presumptive oocyte, it seems likely that the loss of cup activity does not disrupt the initial specification of the oocyte, but rather affects the maintenance of oocyte identity. In this context, it is interesting to note that orb activity is required for the proper specification of the oocyte, and in strong orb mutants, oocyte identity is not properly established or maintained. Perhaps the presence of excessive amounts of Orb in the nurse cells of these cup mutant chambers might also compromise oocyte identity, but by a different mechanism. Instead of failing to express key oocyte determinants as in orb mutants, Orb would promote the premature expression of these determinants in the nurse cells.
An important question is why the orb autoregulatory loop becomes precociously activated in cup mutants? One factor that likely contributes to the premature activation of the orb autoregulatory loop is a failure to deadenylate orb mRNAs. Recent studies by Igreja and Izaurralde [22] have shown that one of the regulatory functions of the Cup protein is to recruit components of the deadenylation machinery and promote the deadenylation of its target mRNAs. Assuming that cup has a similar activity in the female germline, then it should directly antagonize Orb, which is thought to activate translation by promoting polyadenylation. A prediction of this model is that orb poly(A) tail lengths should increase when cup activity is reduced. Indeed, this is the case; we found that the poly(A) tails of orb mRNAs in cup mutants are elongated compared to wild type.
While an increase in poly(A) tail length would be expected to generally increase orb mRNA translation efficiency, a simple change in translational efficiency would not fully account for the effects of cup mutations. In particular, one might expect to observe a phenotype similar to that seen in dfmr1 mutants where Orb protein levels are increased proportionally in both the nurse cells and the oocyte. However, in cup mutants there is a disproportionate increase in Orb protein levels in the nurse cells. This difference suggests that the orb autoregulatory loop is also precociously activated in nurse cells. In previous studies, we found that like the CPEB protein in Xenopus oocytes [27], Orb activity is modulated by phosphorylation [19]. We also found that phosphorylation is dependent upon CK2 activity. When ck2 activity is partially compromised, there is a marked shift in the phosphoisoform profile towards the hypophosphorylated isoforms. Accompanying this shift in phosphoisoform profile, orb functions in DV polarity and orb autoregulation are disrupted. The results described here indicate that a shift in the opposite direction, i.e. towards the hyperphosphorylated isoforms occurs in cup mutant ovaries. Based on our previous work, such a shift in the phosphoisoform profile would be expected to upregulate orb activity. This change in phosphorylation status, like a failure in deadenylation, would be expected to contribute to the overexpression of Orb in cup mutant egg chambers. If this change in phosphorylation status were to occur in the nurse cells, it could lead to the precocious activation of the orb autoregulatory loop in the nurse cells and a disproportionate increase in the amount of Orb protein in these cells. Similarly, it could explain why the orb target osk mRNA is prematurely translated in cup mutants [14][17].
Since cup is a translational repressor, a plausible idea is that it indirectly downregulates phosphorylation by repressing the synthesis of CK2, some other kinase or the factors that control kinase activity. Alternatively (or in addition), the presence of Cup protein in Orb complexes could impede hyperphosphorylation. Consistent with this expectation, we were unable to detect Cup in Western blots of extracts from the two strongest alleles, cup8 and cup3. cup1355 is thought to encode a wild type protein and Cup-Orb complexes can be detected in this mutant (data not shown); however, as reported by Keyes and Spradling [13], Cup is expressed at a greatly reduced level (especially at later stages where effects on Orb expression are greatest) and it seems possible that Cup would be absent from many Orb complexes in this mutant.
While a model in which Cup inhibits phosphorylation (either directly or indirectly) would help explain why the levels of the hyperphosphorylated Orb isoforms increase in cup mutant ovaries, it leaves open the question of what happens in wild type ovaries. Since Cup promotes deadenylation, it should directly antagonize Orb activation of translation as long as the Cup protein remains associated with Orb containing mRNPs. Thus, a simple expectation is that Cup would dissociate from Orb mRNP complexes when Orb is hyperphosphorylated and activates translation. However, this does not seem to be the case as we find that Cup is associated with both hypo- (inactive) and hyper- (active) phosphorylated Orb (Fig. 1). Also, like Orb, Cup co-sediments with polysomes (unpublished data). If Cup remains associated with Orb mRNP complexes even after activation of translation, then there must be mechanisms that attenuate Cup dependent deadenylation and translational repression. One likely mechanism is that Cup-Orb mRNPs are re-organized upon activation and factors that facilitate Cup repressive activities are displaced. One such factor would be the Bruno repressor, which helps recruit Cup to target mRNAs. Bruno binds to many of the orb and cup regulatory targets including orb mRNA and like Cup it is thought to associate with newly synthesized mRNAs and repress translation while they are being transported into the oocyte [8][10], [15], [28], [29]. Once the mRNAs are transported into the oocyte, Bruno complexes containing Orb mRNA targets are reorganized and Bruno is displaced [19], [30]. It seems possible that factors like Not4 and Bicaudal-C, which function in deadenylation or translational repression, could also be displaced from the Cup-Orb complexes when Orb is activated. In addition to the reorganization of Cup-Orb mRNPs, it is possible that modifications that accompany translational activation, such as Orb phosphorylation help abrogate the repressive activities of the Cup protein.
Drosophila stocks
HD19G orb343/Tm3Ser flies were described in [10]. cup alleles used in this study were cup1, cup3, cup6, cup8 and cup1355. cup1355 was recovered in a P-element mutagenesis screen [31]; cup1, cup3, cup6 and cup8 were EMS-induced alleles recovered by Schüpbach and Wieschaus [12]. cupΔ212 lacks the cup-eIF4E interaction domain and is described by Nakamura et al., [15].
Co-immunoprecipitation
Ovaries of 2–3 days old were fed on yeast overnight and dissected in 1× PBS. Ovary extract was prepared by homogenizing ovaries in Co-IP buffer (20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 250 mM sucrose, 0.05% NP40, 0.5% Triton-X, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml protease inhibitor cocktail, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM NaF, 40 µM NaVO3, 40 µM Na3VO4 and 500 µg of RNase A). The homogenate was centrifuged and the supernatant mixed with Orb antibody-coupled protein A/G beads (Calbiochem), and incubated at room temperature for 2 hours. The beads were washed with Co-IP buffer and the proteins that were immunoprecipitated analyzed by Western blots. The amount of ovary extract which was loaded in one control lane is approximately 10% of the amount of ovary extract that was used in the immunoprecipitation reactions loaded in one experimental lane.
Western analysis
Protein samples were ran on ~10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore). Blots were blocked in 5% milk/1× TBST for 2 hours, then incubated in primary antibodies (1[ratio]30 anti-Orb 6H4 and 4H8; 1[ratio]1000 anti-Cup [13], [16]; 1[ratio]2500 anti-α-tubulin antibodies (Sigma)). Following rinsing, blots were incubated with secondary peroxidase-conjugated antibodies at 1[ratio]1000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Proteins were detected using chemiluminescence (ECL plus kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Quantification of protein levels were performed using ImageJ (NIH).
Immunofluorescent staining
Ovaries were dissected and fixed in freshly made 4% paraformaldehyde. After rinsing, the ovaries were blocked in 10 mg/ml BSA/PBSTT. The samples were incubated in primary antibodies (1[ratio]30 anti-Orb 6H4 and 4H8 in 1 mg/ml BSA/PBSTT) overnight at 4°C, then rinsed. Incubation in secondary antibodies (isotype-specific Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG2a and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG1 (Molecular Probes, Inc.) against 6H4 and 4H8, respectively) was performed at room temperature for approximately 2 hours. Microscopy was performed on a Perkin Elmer confocal microscope.
In situ hybridization
Ovaries were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, then washed in PBSTT for 10 minutes twice. The fixed ovaries were incubated in 50 µg/ml of Proteinase K for 4 minutes. The reaction was stopped by incubation in 2 mg/ml glycine for 2 minutes. The ovaries were then washed in PBSTT for 5 minutes then re-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes. Following a wash in PBSTT, the ovaries were incubated in 1[ratio]1 hybridization buffer[ratio]PBSTT for 10 minutes at room temperature and hybridization buffer for another 10 minutes. Pre-hybridization was performed at 55°C for one hour. The probe was denatured at 80°C for 5 minutes and diluted to 1[ratio]100. Hybridization with the probe was performed at 55°C overnight. After hybridization, the ovaries were equilibrated back to PBSTT by incubation in decreasing concentrations of hybridization buffer in PBSTT. The ovaries were blocked in 1% BSA/PBSTT for 30 minutes then incubated in 1[ratio]5000 α-DIG for 90 minutes at room temperature, then rinsed in PBSTT and washed in alkaline wash. The ovaries were developed in 2% NBT/BCIP in alkaline wash.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Approximately ten pairs of ovaries were hand-dissected for each experiment. Previtellogenic stages were separated from the post-vitellogenic stages; only the previtellogenic stages were used in these experiments and the post-vitellogenic stages were discarded. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol and reverse-transcribed. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using primers specific for orb and osk. To normalize the amount of mRNA in the ovaries, actin specific primers were used as a control and as a proxy of relative total amounts of mRNA in the wild type and cup ovaries. The relative total amount of mRNA in the cup ovaries were calculated as a ratio of the actin mRNA in cup mutants to the amount of actin mRNA in the wild type ovaries. The relative amount of orb and osk mRNA in the cup ovaries is calculated as a ratio of amounts of orb and osk mRNA to the amounts of orb and osk mRNA in the wild type ovaries. To compare the relative amounts of orb and osk mRNA in the mutants relative to the wild type, the ratio of the relative amounts of orb and osk mRNA in cup mutants to the relative total amount of actin mRNA is calculated.
Figure S1
cup mutants have defects in oocyte determination. Green: Encore. Red: Orb. WT: In wild type ovaries, Encore and Orb are concentrated in the presumptive oocyte in newly formed 16 cell cysts in the germarium. During early pre-vitellogenic stages the localization pattern is further refined so that only the oocyte has high levels of these two proteins. In the germarium of cup8 ovaries, Encore and Orb are distributed in most of the cells in the 16-cell cyst (see arrow). The two proteins are also not properly concentrated into the presumptive oocyte in many older mutant egg chambers. Instead, several cells have high levels of Encore and Orb (see arrowheads).
(TIF)
Figure S2
Poly(A) tails are elongated in cup1355. Poly(A) tails of orb mRNA from wild type and cup1355 (as indicated) were analyzed using the anchored poly(A)-tail assay [24]. Anchor primers for reverse transcription and amplification from the poly(A) tail were as described in [24], while the nested orb specific primers (F2 and F4) were derived from the orb 3′ UTR. The amplification products were analyzed on an agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide.
(PDF)
Table S1
cup negatively regulates orb and suppresses the ventralization phenotype of HD19Gorb343. Females that were trans-heterozygous for HD19Gorb343 and five different alleles of cup mutants were generated by crossing HD19G orb343/TM3Ser females (n = 10 in each cross) with cup/CyO males. Independent crosses were set up and scored at 18°C and 25°C. The number of embryos scored at each temperature is shown in the table. While approximately 20–30% of embryos laid by HD19G orb343/+ females were ventralized, suppression of this phenotype was seen in trans-heterozygotes of all five alleles. Approximately 2.5–7.3% of embryos laid by cup mutant transheterozygotes were ventralized at 18°C. Suppression was weaker but still very obvious and statistically significant at 25°C, where 8.6–20.4% of embryos were ventralized.
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank Trudi Schüpbach, Craig Smibert and Allan Spradling for reagents. Immunofluorescence imaging was performed in the Confocal and Electron Microscopy Core Facility, with technical assistance from Joe Goodhouse. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed at the SynSeq Core Facility. We greatly appreciate helpful comments from the anonymous reviewers.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This research was initially supported by grant number GM56937 from National Institutes of Health until it was terminated in 2009. Subsequent support came from National Institutes of Health grant number GM043432. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
1. Bilger A, Fox CA, Wahle E, Wickens M. Nuclear polyadenylation factors recognize cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1106–16. [PubMed]
2. Hake LE, Richter JD. CPEB is a specificity factor that mediates cytoplasmic polyadenylation during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Cell. 1994;79:617–27. [PubMed]
3. Lantz V, Ambrosio L, Schedl P. The Drosophila orb gene is predicted to encode sex-specific germline RNA-binding proteins and has localized transcripts in ovaries and early embryos. Development. 1992;115:75–88. [PubMed]
4. Christerson LB, McKearin DM. orb is required for anteroposterior and dorsoventral patterning during Drosophila oogenesis. Genes Dev. 1994;8:614–28. [PubMed]
5. Lantz V, Chang JS, Horabin JI, Bopp D, Schedl P. The Drosophila orb RNA-binding protein is required for the formation of the egg chamber and establishment of polarity. Genes Dev. 1994;8:598–613. [PubMed]
6. Huynh JR, St Johnston D. The role of BicD, Egl, Orb and the microtubules in the restriction of meiosis to the Drosophila oocyte. Development. 2000;127:2785–94. [PubMed]
7. Chang JS, Tan L, Wolf MR, Schedl P. Functioning of the Drosophila orb gene in gurken mRNA localization and translation. Development. 2001;128:3169–77. [PubMed]
8. Chang JS, Tan L, Schedl P. The Drosophila CPEB homolog, orb, is required for oskar protein expression in oocytes. Dev Biol. 1999;215:91–106. [PubMed]
9. Castagnetti S, Ephrussi A. Orb and a long poly(A) tail are required for efficient oskar translation at the posterior pole of the Drosophila oocyte. Development. 2003;130:835–43. [PubMed]
10. Tan L, Chang JS, Costa A, Schedl P. An autoregulatory feedback loop directs the localized expression of the Drosophila CPEB protein Orb in the developing oocyte. Development. 2001;128:1159–69. [PubMed]
11. Costa A, Wang Y, Dockendorff TC, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, et al. The Drosophila fragile X protein functions as a negative regulator in the orb autoregulatory pathway. Dev Cell. 2005;8:331–42. [PubMed]
12. Schüpbach T, Wieschaus E. Germline autonomy of maternal-effect mutations altering the embryonic body pattern of Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1986;113:443–8. [PubMed]
13. Keyes LN, Spradling AC. The Drosophila gene fs(2)cup interacts with otu to define a cytoplasmic pathway required for the structure and function of germ-line chromosomes. Development. 1997;124:1419–31. [PubMed]
14. Wilhelm JE, Hilton M, Amos Q, Henzel WJ. Cup is an eIF4E binding protein required for both the translational repression of oskar and the recruitment of Barentsz. J Cell Biol. 2003;163:1197–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Nakamura A, Sato K, Hanyu-Nakamura K. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Dev Cell. 2004;6:69–78. [PubMed]
16. Nelson MR, Leidal AM, Smibert CA. Drosophila Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein that functions in Smaug-mediated translational repression. EMBO J. 2004;23:150–9. [PubMed]
17. Zappavigna V, Piccioni F, Villaescusa JC, Verrotti AC. Cup is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein that interacts with the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E to modulate Drosophila ovary development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14800–5. [PubMed]
18. Chekulaeva M, Hentze MW, Ephrussi A. Bruno acts as a dual repressor of oskar translation, promoting mRNA oligomerization and formation of silencing particles. Cell. 2006;124:521–33. [PubMed]
19. Wong LC, Costa A, McLeod I, Sarkeshik A, Yates J, III, et al. The functioning of the Drosophila CPEB protein Orb is regulated by phosphorylation and requires Casein kinase 2 activity. PLoS ONE. 2011; 2011;6(9):e24355. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Van Buskirk C, Hawkins NC, Schüpbach T. Encore is a member of a novel family of proteins and affects multiple processes in Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 2000;127(22):4753–62. [PubMed]
21. Radford HE, Meijer HA, de Moor CH. Translational control by cytoplasmic polyadenylation in Xenopus oocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1779:217–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Igreja C, Izaurralde E. Cup promotes deadenylation and inhibits decapping of mRNA targets. Genes Dev. 2011;25(18):1955–67. [PubMed]
23. Sallés FJ, Lieberfarb ME, Wreden C, Gergen JP, Strickland S. Coordinate initiation of Drosophila development by regulated polyadenylation of maternal messenger RNAs. Science. 1994;266(5193):1996–9. [PubMed]
24. Salles FJ, Richards WG, Strickland S. Assaying the polyadenylation state of mRNAs. Methods. 1999;17:38–45. [PubMed]
25. Dickson KS, Thompson SR, Gray NK, Wickens M. Poly(A) polymerase and the regulation of cytoplasmic polyadenylation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:41810–6. [PubMed]
26. Benoit P, Papin C, Kwak JE, Wickens M, Simonelig M. PAP- and GLD-2-type poly(A) polymerases are required sequentially in cytoplasmic polyadenylation and oogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2008;135(11):1969–79. [PubMed]
27. Mendez R, Murthy KG, Ryan K, Manley JL, Richter JD. Phosphorylation of CPEB by Eg2 mediates the recruitment of CPSF into an active cytoplasmic polyadenylation complex. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1253–9. [PubMed]
28. Webster PJ, Liang L, Berg CA, Lasko P, Macdonald PM. Translational repressor bruno plays multiple roles in development and is widely conserved. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2510–21. [PubMed]
29. Kim-Ha J, Kerr K, Macdonald PM. Translational regulation of oskar mRNA by Bruno, an ovarian RNA-binding protein, is essential. Cell. 1995;81(3):403–412. [PubMed]
30. Snee MJ, MacDonald PM. Dynamic organization and plasticity of sponge bodies. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(4):918–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Karpen GH, Spradling AC. Analysis of subtelomeric heterochromatin in the Drosophila minichromosome Dp1187 by single P element insertional mutagenesis. Genetics. 1992;132:737–53. [PubMed]
Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of
Public Library of Science