1. Rozek P, Groth D. Business continuity planning. It’s a critical element of disaster preparedness. Can you afford to keep it off your radar? Health Manag Technol. 2008;29:10–2. [PubMed]
2. Dawes SS, Cresswell AM, Cahan BB. Learning From Crisis: Lessons in Human and Information Infrastructure From the World Trade Center Response. Social Science Computer Review. 2004;22:52–66.
3. Somers S. Survey and Assessment of Planning for Operational Continuity in Public Works. PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT AND POLICY. 2007;12:451–464.
4. Reeder BP, Turner AM, Demiris G. Use of Technology to Support Information Needs for Continuity of Operations Planning in Public Health: A Systematic Review. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. 2010;2:20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Carroll JM. Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley; 1995.
6. Carroll JM. Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with computers. 2000;13:43–60.
7. Carroll JM. Making use is more than a matter of task analysis. Interacting with Computers. 2002;14:619–627.
8. Sutcliffe A, Thew S, De Bruijn O, Buchan I, Jarvis P, McNaught J, Procter R. User engagement by user-centred design in e-Health. Philosophical transactions Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. 2010;368:4209–24. [PubMed]
9. Go K, Carroll JM. The Blind Men and the Elephant: Views of Scenario-Based System Design Interactions. 2004;11:44.
10. Hägglund M, Scandurra I, Koch S. Scenarios to capture work processes in shared homecare--From analysis to application. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2008 In Press, Corrected Proof.
11. Weng C, Gennari JH, McDonald DW. Scenario-based participatory design of a collaborative clinical trial protocol authoring system. AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings/AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium; 2003. p. 1051. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Cooper A. The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Sams; 1999.
13. Pruitt J, Grudin J. Personas: practice and theory. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences; San Francisco, California: ACM; 2003.
14. Chang YN, Lim YK, Stolterman E. Personas: from theory to practices. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges; Lund, Sweden: ACM; 2008.
15. Grudin J, Pruitt J. Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference; 2002. pp. 144–161.
16. Alesi P. Building enterprise-wide resilience by integrating business continuity capability into day-to-day business culture and technology. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning: Henry Stewart Publications LLP. 2008:214–220. [PubMed] 17. Turner AM, Ramey J, Lee S. Connecting public health IT systems with enacted work: report of an ethnographic study. AMIA … Annual Symposium proceedings/AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium; 2008. pp. 737–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 18. Reeder B, Demiris G. Building the PHARAOH Framework Using Scenario-Based Design: A Set of Pandemic Decision-Making Scenarios for Continuity of Operations in a Large Municipal Public Health Agency. Journal of Medical Systems. 2010:34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 19. Reeder B, Hills RA, Demiris G, Revere D, Pina J. Reusable design: A proposed approach to Public Health Informatics system design. BMC Public Health. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Blomberg J, Giacomi J, Mosher A, Swenton-Wall P. Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design. In: Schuler D, Namioka A, editors. Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1993. pp. 123–155.
21. Oostveen A-M, Besselaar Pvd. From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems. Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices; Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM; 2004.
22. Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
24. Kaindl H. An integration of scenarios with their purposes in task modeling. Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, \& techniques; Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States: ACM; 1995.
25. Antón AI, Potts C. A Representational Framework for Scenarios of System Use. Requirements Engineering. 1998;3:219–241.
26. Dzida W, Freitag R. Making use of scenarios for validating analysis and design. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 1998;24:1182–1196.
27. Filippidou D. Designing with scenarios: A critical review of current research and practice. Requirements Engineering. 1998;3:1–22.
28. Haumer P, Pohl K, Weidenhaupt K. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions. 1998. Requirements elicitation and validation with real world scenes; pp. 1036–1054.
29. Rolland C, Ben Achour C, Cauvet C, Ralyté J, Sutcliffe A, Maiden N, Jarke M, Haumer P, Pohl K, Dubois E, Heymans P. A proposal for a scenario classification framework. Requirements Engineering. 1998;3:23–47.
30. Stiemerling O, Cremers AB. The use of cooperation scenarios in the design and evaluation of a CSCW system. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 1998;24:1171–1181.
31. Galal GH, Paul RJ. A Qualitative Scenario Approach to Managing Evolving Requirements. Requirements Engineering. 1999;4:92–102.
32. Carroll JM. Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2000.
33. Rosson MB, Carroll JM. Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. San Fancisco: Academic Press; 2002.
34. Jaspers MW, Steen T, van den Bos C, Geenen M. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2004;73:11–12. [PubMed]
36. Reeder BP, Demiris G. Building the PHARAOH Framework using Scenario-Based Design: A Set of Pandemic Decision-Making Scenarios for Continuity of Operations in a Large Municipal Public Health Agency. Journal of Medical Systems. (In Press) - Accepted for publication 3/30/2009 - JOMS418R1.
37. Krathwohl DR. Methods of educational & social science research: an integrated approach. New York; Harlow, England: Longman; 1998.
38. Yi Q, Hoskins RE, Hillringhouse EA, Sorensen SS, Oberle MW, Fuller SS, Wallace JC. Integrating open-source technologies to build low-cost information systems for improved access to public health data. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7:29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Turner AM, Reeder B, Wallace JA. CODA: Developing an Open Source Resource Management Tool for Public Health Preparedness. 2012 ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI 2012); Miami, FL. 2011. (in review)
40. Wallace JA, Reeder B, Turner AM. CODA: A Continuity of Operations Data Analysis System for Public Health; Hyatt Regency Hotel, Atlanta, GA: Public Health Informatics Network - Centers for Disease Control; 2009.
41. O’Carroll P, Cahn M, Auston I, Selden C. Information needs in public health and health policy: Results of recent studies. Journal of Urban Health. 1998;75:785–793. [PMC free article] [PubMed]