|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
SLUG is a zinc-finger transcription factor of the Snail/Slug zinc-finger family that plays a role in migration and invasion of tumor cells. Mechanisms by which SLUG promotes migration and invasion in prostate cancers remain elusive.
Expression level of CXCR4 and CXCL12 was examined by Western blot, RT-PCR, and qPCR analyses. Forced expression of SLUG was mediated by retroviruses, and SLUG and CXCL12 was downregulated by shRNAs-expressing lentiviruses. Migration and invasion of prostate cancer were measured by scratch-wound assay and invasion assay, respectively.
We demonstrated that forced expression of SLUG elevated CXCR4 and CXCL12 expression in human prostate cancer cell lines PC3, DU145, 22RV1, and LNCaP; conversely, reduced expression of SLUG by shRNA downregulated CXCR4 and CXCL12 expression at RNA and protein levels in prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, ectopic expression of SLUG increased MMP9 expression and activity in PC3, 22RV1, and DU-145 cells, and SLUG knockdown by shRNA downregulated MMP9 expression. We showed that CXCL12 is required for SLUG-mediated MMP9 expression in prostate cancer cells. Moreover, we found that migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells was increased by ectopic expression of SLUG and decreased by SLUG knockdown. Notably, knockdown of CXCL12 by shRNA impaired SLUG-mediated migration and invasion in prostate cancer cells. Lastly, our data suggest that CXCL12 and SLUG regulate migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells independent of cell growth.
We provide the first compelling evidence that upregulation of autocrine CXCL12 is a major mechanism underlying SLUG-mediated migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells. Our findings suggest that CXCL12 is a therapeutic target for prostate cancer metastasis.
Prostate cancer is the second leading type of cancer in men in United States. In 2010, new cases of prostate cancer were estimated at 217,730, resulting in 32,050 deaths in . The major cause of death is bone metastasis. Metastasis is a very complicated process during which cancer cells go through a series of steps: (i) cell dissociation from the primary tumor environment, (ii) cell adhesion to the endothelial surface at the target, (iii) cell invasion through the endothelial surface, (iv) cell invasion into new environment, and (v) cell proliferation.
In our previous study, we found that SLUG, a zinc-finger transcription factor, was elevated in mouse prostate tumors and human prostate cancer cell lines . SLUG belongs to the Slug/Snail superfamily [3,4], and it regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in a variety of cancers . EMT is a dynamic process that promotes cell motility with decreased adhesive ability, and thus is thought to be a major starting point for cancer metastasis . SLUG plays a major role in EMT during embryonic development and metastasis of breast cancers, through partial inhibition of E-cadherin [7,8,3].
In the tumor microenvironment, a complex network of chemokines and receptors affects metastasis. The CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway was originally discovered in the immune system to play an important role in cancer cell metastasis [9-12]. Mice deficient of either CXCR4 or CXCL12 had abnormal development in the central nervous system . CXCL12 belongs to chemokine family of small peptides with 8 to 12 kDA size that control cell activation, differentiation, and trafficking [14,15]. CXCL12 is expressed by several organs: lung, liver, skeletal muscle, brain, heart, kidney, skin, and bone marrow; its secretion is related to tissue damage . The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis can coordinate metastasis of a variety of cancers, such as bladder , breast , head and neck , ovarian , renal cell , and prostate [22,23]. Interestingly, SLUG is required for transcriptional and functional regulation of CXCL12 during bone tissue remodeling .
Although the role of SLUG in cancer metastasis has been documented in other cancers besides prostate cancer, its molecular mechanism remains elusive. In this study, we examined the regulation of the Slug-CXC4R/CXCL12-metastasis triangle in an in vitro cell culture model of human prostate cancer cells. We used gain- and loss-of-function approaches to study (i) how SLUG regulates the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis, and (ii) the functional role of CXCL12 in SLUG-induced migration and invasion of human prostate cancer cell lines. We found that forced expression of SLUG significantly upregulated both CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression and their downstream target MMP9. Knockdown of SLUG decreased CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression in prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, we showed that downregulation of CXCL12/CXCR4 axis via CXCL12 knockdown impaired SLUG-mediated MMP9 expression, migration and invasion. Lastly, we provide evidence that CXCL12 and SLUG regulate migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells independent of cell growth. Our findings suggest that prostate cancer cells can gain invasive characteristics through upregulation of autocrine CXCL12.
CXCL12 expression was significantly higher in human prostate cancer tissue than hyperplastic prostate tissues , suggesting that CXCL12 has an autocrine regulatory role via its receptor CXCR4 in the regulation of prostate cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis . Slug is a zinc-finger transcription factor and its overexpression promotes migration, invasion, and metastasis of various cancer cells . To determine whether CXCL12/CXCR4 axis plays a role in SLUG-mediated migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells in vitro, we first tested if forced expression of SLUG increases CXCL12 expression. We infected PC3 cells and DU145 cells with retroviruses expressing SLUG (pMig-Slug) or control retroviruses (pMig). By qPCR and RT-PCR analysis, we found that CXCL12 transcription level was 7-fold higher in PC3 cell line overexpressing SLUG versus vector (Figure (Figure1A).1A). In addition, we analyzed CXCL12 expression in established DU145 stable cell lines overexpressing SLUG or vector (Figure (Figure1B),1B), and found that its expression was significantly upregulated by SLUG. Using ELISA, we also measured the protein level of CXCL12 in culture medium of PC3 stable cell lines. Our data showed that the CXCL12 protein level was 5-fold higher in PC3 cells stably expressing pMig-Slug versus the pMig vector control (Figure (Figure1C1C).
In addition to gain-of-function studies, we used a loss-of-function approach to assess the effects of Slug knockdown on CXCL12 expression. We established three stable cell lines in PC3 and DU145 by infecting lentiviruses-expressing control shRNA (Ctr) or small hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting the human SLUG gene (shRNA Sh1, Sh2), followed by selection with puromycin. As we expected, Slug RNA level expression was significantly reduced by two independent SLUG shRNAs (Sh1, Sh2) in PC3 (Figure (Figure2A)2A) and DU145 (Figure (Figure2B),2B), as compared with control shRNA (non-target scramble shRNA). Consistent with Figure Figure1,1, our data showed that CXCL12 expression was dramatically downregulated in PC3 and DU145 cell lines harboring SLUG shRNAs versus those carrying control shRNA (Figure 2A, B). Moreover, we measured CXCL12 protein expression in culture medium of these stable cell lines and found that CXCL12 protein concentration was significantly lower in PC3 cells expressing SLUG-specific shRNA versus control shRNA (Figure (Figure2C2C).
We used gain- and loss-of-function approaches to demonstrate that SLUG is a positive regulator of CXCL12 in prostate cancer cells.
CXCR-4 is an alpha-chemokine receptor specific for CXCL12 (also called stromal-derived-factor-1 or SDF-1), a molecule endowed with potent chemotactic activity for lymphocytes and tumor cells. It has been reported that CXCR4 is expressed in prostate cancer cells but not in immortalized prostate epithelial cells [27,28]. In our previous study, we found that SLUG protein expression is elevated in human prostate cancer cell lines . To investigate whether SLUG can also regulate CXCR4 expression in prostate cancer cell lines, we infected four prostate cancer cell lines with retrovirus expressing SLUG (pMig-Slug) or control retroviruses (pMig). We examined CXCR4 expression of both at the transcriptional level and protein level by RT-PCR and qPCR and Western Blot analysis, respectively. Our data showed that forced expression of SLUG significantly increased CXCR4 expression at the transcription level in PC3 (Figure (Figure3A),3A), DU145 (Figure (Figure3B),3B), 22RV1 (Figure (Figure3C),3C), and LNCaP cell lines (Figure (Figure3C),3C), respectively. In addition, we examined the protein level of CXCR4 in these stable cell lines. Consistent with the qPCR and RT-PCR data (Figure 3A-D), Western blot analysis confirmed that forced expression of SLUG increased CXCR4 protein expression in these four prostate cancer cell lines (Figure (Figure3E).3E). In addition, flow cytometric analysis indicated that CXCR4 expression is higher on surface of LNCaP cells stably carrying pMig-Slug versus pMig vector control (Additional file 1, Figure S1).
Next, we asked if endogenous SLUG is required for CXCR4 expression in prostate cancer cell lines. To do so, we confirmed knockdown of SLUG by two independent shRNA (Sh1, Sh2) in both the PC3 and DU145 cell lines (Figure 4A, B). We examined CXCR4 expression in both of these stable cell lines. Our data revealed that SLUG knockdown significantly downregulates CXCR4 expression at the transcriptional level in both PC3 (Figure (Figure4A)4A) and DU145 (Figure (Figure4B)4B) cell lines, by qPCR (Figure 4A, B, left panels) and RT-PCR (Figure 4A, B, right panels) analyses. Furthermore, we analyzed protein expression of CXCR4 in these stable cell lines and found that CXCR4 protein was significantly reduced in PC3 (Figure (Figure4C,4C, left panel) and DU145 (Figure (Figure4C,4C, right panel) when SLUG was knocked down by two independent shRNAs. These data, together with Figures Figures1,1, ,22 and and3,3, demonstrated that SLUG upregulates CXCR4 and CXCL12 gene expression in human prostate cancer cells.
Our data suggest that SLUG could positively regulate the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in prostate cancer cells, leading to cancer migration and invasion. MMP9 belongs to the matrix metalloproteinase family  and is a target of the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in cancer cells, including prostate cancer . Therefore, we decided to determine whether or not MMP9 is also positively regulated by SLUG in prostate cancer cells. To address this question, we first examined MMP9 gene expression in prostate cancer cells that stably overexpress SLUG gene by qPCR (Figure 5A, B, left panels) and RT-PCR (Figure 5A, B, right panels). Our data showed that MMP9 expression was significantly higher in PC3 (Figure (Figure5A)5A) and DU145 (Figure (Figure5B)5B) stable cell lines overexpressing SLUG than in cells carrying pMig vector only. Next, we examined MMP9 activity in SLUG-overexpressing prostate cancer cell lines by gelatin-zymography. In agreement with Figure 5A, B, MMP9 activity was significantly elevated by SLUG overexpression in PC3 (Figure (Figure5C)5C) and DU145 (Figure (Figure5D)5D) cell lines. Consistently, when SLUG was knocked down by two independent specific shRNAs in PC3 (Figure (Figure6A)6A) and DU145 (Figure (Figure6B),6B), MMP9 expression was dramatically decreased in these cells. Together, our findings indicate that Slug positively regulates MMP9 expression, possibly via CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway in prostate cancer cells.
Although our data thus far indicate that both CXCL12 and CXCR4 are positively regulated by SLUG, it remains to be determined if the CXCL12/CXCR4 is a mediator of SLUG-induced MMP9 expression. To address this question, we infected PC3 cell lines overexpressing SLUG or vector with control shRNA or CXCL12 shRNA (Sh1, Sh2)-expressing lentiviruses, and then confirmed efficiency of these shRNAs to knockdown CXCL12 by RT-PCR (Figure (Figure6C).6C). Next, we examined expression of MMP9 in these PC3 stable cell lines by qPCR (Figure (Figure7A)7A) and RT-PCR (Additional file 1, Figure S2). Our data showed that MMP9 expression is significantly higher in PC3 cells co-expressing SLUG and control shRNA, but is not evident in PC3 cells co-expressing SLUG and CXCL12-specific shRNAs (Sh1 and Sh2). These data indicated that CXCL12 is required for SLUG-mediated MMP9 expression in prostate cancer cells.
Furthermore, we performed a scratch-wound assay in the confluent monolayer of cultured stable cell lines. Consistent with published reports , our data showed that overexpression of SLUG exhibited a higher scratch closure rate than the controls in metastatic PC-3 cells (Figure (Figure7B)7B) and in non-metastatic 22RV1 cell lines (Additional file 1, Figure S3). Interestingly, SLUG-expressing stable cell lines harboring CXCL12 shRNA showed an impaired scratch closure, compared with the control stable cell line expressing SLUG and control shRNA (Figure (Figure7C).7C). These data indicate that CXCL12 is required for SLUG-mediated MMP9 expression and migration of prostate cancer cells.
Metastasis is characterized by the ability of cancer cells to invade adjacent tissue, and is regulated by multiple signaling pathways, including the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis. Because our data show that SLUG positively regulated both CXCL12 and CXCR4; therefore, we assessed the role of CXCL12 in SLUG-mediated prostate cancer invasion. First, we examined the ability of SLUG to promote prostate cancer invasion by the Oris™ Cell Invasion Assay, which can quantity and image cells invading through an extracellular matrix (ECM). Figure Figure8A8A demonstrates overexpression of SLUG increased invasion of PC3 cells. Second, we infected SLUG-expressing PC3 cells with lentiviruses harboring CXCL12 shRNA (Sh1, Sh2) or control shRNA (Ctr). As shown in Figure Figure8B8B and and8C,8C, PC3 cell line stably expressing SLUG and shRNA Ctr (Figure (Figure8B,8B, left panel) had a higher invasive ability than the other two stable cell lines co-expressing SLUG and CXCL12 shRNAs (Figure (Figure8B,8B, middle and right panels). Thus, our data indicated that CXCL12 is critical for SLUG-mediated invasion of prostate cancer cells.
Because CXCL12 shRNAs relieve SLUG-mediated migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells (Figure (Figure7,7, ,8),8), we asked whether or not cell proliferation plays a role in these processes. First, we assessed if knockdown of CXCL12 by shRNAs affects cell growth of PC3 cell lines. To do so, we infected PC3 cells with retroviruses expressing shRNA Ctr and two CXCL12 shRNAs (Sh1 and Sh2), respectively. We confirmed efficiency of CXCL12 knockdown by RT-PCR after drug selection (Figure (Figure6C),6C), and then carefully monitored growth of these PC3 stable cell lines by measuring cell numbers of viable cells at each time point. Our data showed that PC3 cell lines expressing shRNA Ctr or two CXCL12 shRNAs (Sh1 and Sh2) had a similar cell proliferation rate (Additional file 1, Figure S4A).
Next, we examined the effects of SLUG overexpression and CXCL12 knowdown on cell growth of PC3 cells in cell culture. As shown in Figure S4B (Additional file 1), the PC3 cell lines expressing SLUG showed a lower proliferation rate than PC3 cell lines with vector, regardless of CXCL12 knockdown. Although CXCL12 shRNAs had no effect on PC3 cell growth (Additional file 1, Figure S4A), CXCL12 knockdown further inhibited growth of PC3 cells overexpressing SLUG (Additional file 1, Figure S4B). Therefore, it is unlikely that CXCL12 knockdown impaired SLUG-mediated migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells by promoting cell growth. Our data suggest that migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells are independent of cell growth.
Metastasis is the spread of a disease from one organ or tissue to another non-adjacent organ or tissue; and thus, it is regulated by numerous signaling pathways in both the cancer cells and microenvironment. CXCR4/CXCL12 axis plays role in cancer cell metastasis and proliferation; the importance of the CXC4/CXCL12 axis may differ in different types of cancer cells, due to their discrete expression. For example, CXCR4 expression is lower in gastrointestinal tumors than breast cancer . Overexpression of CXCR4 in prostate cancer cells accelerated prostate tumor metastasis, prostate tumor vascularization, and tumor growth in vivo . CXCL12 stimulates chemotaxis of metastatic prostate cancer cells expressing a high level of CXCR4 and accelerates their migration . Conversely, blockade of CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction in prostate cancer cells via CXCR4 knockdown significantly inhibits bone metastasis in vivo . Androgens promote migration of prostate cancer cells via KLF5-mediated upregulation of CXCR4 expression .
In this study, we used gain- and loss-of-function approaches to determine that SLUG positively regulated both CXCL12 and CXCR4 at the RNA and protein level. Because SLUG is a zinc-finger transcription factor and mainly functions as a transcription repressor when it is tethered to promoters of target genes [4,7], we therefore assumed that SLUG regulates CXCL12 and CXCR4 in an indirect manner, i.e., by suppressing expression of one or more inhibitors of these two molecules. It was recently reported that MiR-886-3p directly targets CXCL12 and decreases its expression . In future studies, we will examine if SLUG directly downregulates MiR-886-3p in prostate cancer cells. Interestingly, CXCL12 can increase the RNA and protein level of the CXCR4 receptor in basal cell carcinoma and PC3 cells [38,39]. Therefore, it is possible that SLUG upregulates CXCR4 in a CXCL12-dependent manner. It has been heavily documented that CXCL12 is expressed in the bone microenvironment and creates migration and invasion paths for the tumor cells with CXCR4 expression . Our current findings indicate that CXCL12 is expressed in prostate cancer cells and was induced by SLUG. Notably, it was recently shown that Slug is required for transcriptional and functional regulation of CXCL12 during the remodeling of bone tissue .
Elevated SLUG expression in tumors is correlated with tumor metastasis in many types of tumors [41,25,42], and forced expression of SLUG promotes metastasis of breast cancer in mouse models through partial inhibition of E-cadherin . In this study, we found that SLUG overexpression upregulated endogenous CXCL12 and increased prostate cancer cell migration and invasion, but reduced adhesion (data nor shown). In contrast, knockdown of endogenous CXCL12 expression impaired SLUG-mediated MMP9 expression, and migration and invasion in PC3 cells. Thus, our new findings that CXCL12/CXCR4 is a mediator of SLUG-induced migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells provide insight into the molecular mechanisms by which SLUG promotes tumor cell metastasis in vivo. Neutralizing CXCL12 with specific antibodies in NOD/SCID mice resulted in reduced metastasis to the lungs, adrenal glands, and liver . Therefore, it would be worthwhile to use mouse models to test whether CXCL12 is a key mediator of SLUG-induced metastasis of prostate cancer in vivo.
It has been suggested that CXCL12 promotes tumor invasion by inducing MMP9 , which degrades extracellular matrix components. MMP9 is expressed and secreted from both prostate cancer cells and their microenvironment [30,45]. In addition, high expression of SLUG and MMP9 is found in pancreatic cancer tissues . It remains to be determined whether MMP9 is upregulated by SLUG. Here, we showed that SLUG upregulated both CXCL12 and its downstream target MMP9 expression, and that MMP9 is regulated by SLUG through CXCL12. In the future, it needs to be determined if MMP9 is critical for SLUG-induced invasion of prostate cancer cells.
Overall, our data indicate that CXCL12 is a key mediator for SLUG-induced migration and invasion of human prostate cancer cell lines in vitro; thereby suggesting that autocrine CXCL12 is an important factor for tumor metastasis.
CXCL12/CXCR4 ligand receptor interaction is involved in the directional migration of metastatic prostate cancer cells . We found that SLUG positively regulates expression of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in human prostate cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we determined that forced expression of SLUG increased migration and invasion of human prostate cancer cells through activation of CXCR4/CXCL12 axis. Our findings add support that CXCL12 are a potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer metastasis .
PC3, 22RV1, LNCaP, and DU-145 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). These cells were maintained in culture medium, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
pMig-Slug was constructed by cloning human SLUG gene into pMIGR1 retroviral vector. pLKO.1-Slug shRNA1 (target sequence: 5'-CAGCTGTAAATACTGTGACAA-3'), pLKO.1-Slug shRNA2 (target sequence: 5'- CCAAATCATTTCAACTGAAA-3'), pLKO.1-CXCL12 shRNA1 (target sequence: 5'-TGTGCATTGACCCGAAGCTAA), and pLKO.1-CXCL12 shRNA2 (target sequence: 5'-GCCAACGTCAAGCATCTCAAA-3') were obtained from Open Biosystem (Huntville, AL). pLKO.1 control shRNA (containing non-target scramble shRNA, Addgene plasmid #1864) were purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA).
293T cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells per well in a 6-well plate. The next day, a mixture of plasmid DNA was transfected separately into 293T cells using Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). For retrovirus production, pCL-Ampho (packaging plasmid) was mixed with pMig-based retroviral vectors. To generate the lentiviruses, the packaging plasmids (pCMV-VSVG and psPAX2) were co-transfected with pLKO.1-Slug shRNA or pLKO.1-control shRNA (containing non-target shRNA). The viruses were collected 24 hr after transfection. For viral infection, PC3, 22RV1, or DU-145 cells were seeded at 50% confluence in 6-well plates. The next day, the virus-containing supernatants from 293T cultures were mixed with polybrene (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at a final concentration of 4 mg/ml, and added to the cells in each well. The plate was centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 1 hr at 35°C, and returned to the cell culture incubator. PC3, 22RV1, DU145, and LNCaP cells were infected with retroviruses (pMig-Slug or pMig vector) for 3 times to achieve 100% transduction in these cells. Cells infected with pLKO.1 lentiviruses were selected with puromycin (1 μg/ml), starting at 48 hr after infection.
Total RNA extraction from cultured cells was accomplished by using RNeasy Plus mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA was synthesized by random priming from 1 μg of total RNA with the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Super Mix kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primers used for the RT-PCR and qPCR analysis were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). RT-PCR was performed by using the Hotstar Taq DNA polymerase kit (McLab, San Francisco, CA), and qPCR was performed by using the Perfecta SYBR Green FastMix (Quanta Bioscience, CA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Data were analyzed by using the comparative CT method; CT refers to the ''threshold cycle,'' and is determined for each experiment using MyiQ software. Quantities of gene specific mRNA expression were determined by the CT method. Amplification of GAPDH was performed for each reverse-transcribed sample as an endogenous quantification standard. The fold-difference in gene expression was determined by 2_ΔΔCT. ΔΔCT is equal to (ΔCT of experimental conditions -ΔCT of control conditions). ΔCT is equal to (gene-specific CT -GAPDH CT). The primers are as following: SLUG, 5'-CTTCCTGGTCAAGAAGCA-3' and 5'-GGGAAATAATCACTGTATGTGTG-3'; CXCR4, 5'-ATATACACTTCAGATAACTACACCGAG-3' and 5'-TCAGTTTCTTCTGGTAACCCATGACCA-3'; CXCL12, 5'-ACCGCGCTCTGCCTCAGCGACGGGAAG-3' and 5' TGTTGTTCTTCAGCCGGGCTACAATCTG-3'; MMP9,5'-AGCGGGCGGCGCCTCTGGAGGTTCGA-3' and 5' CCTGGCAGAAATAGGCTTTCTCTCGGT-3'; GAPDH, 5' ATTGACCTCAACTACATGGTTTACATG-3' and 5'-TTGGAGGGATCTCGCTCCTGGAAG-3'.
Conditioned cell culture medium was centrifuged and an SDF1-α immunoassay kit (R&D Systems Inc. Minneapolis, MN) was used for CXCL12 detection. 100 μl of sample or control (or standard) was added into each well, according to the manufacturer's protocol. The optical density of each well was measured within 30 min, using a microplate reader set to 450 nm.
The cells were lysed in the protein lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM beta glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate), supplemented with 1 ml protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The protein samples were analyzed by Western blot analysis using an ECL kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) with antibodies against following antigens: Slug (ANASPEC, Fremont, CA), CXCR4 (Abcam, Boston, MA), GAPDH (Bethyl Laborotaries, Montgomery, TX).
Cells overexpressing pMig or pMig-Slug (70-80% confluence) were washed twice with PBS, and the medium was changed to serum free cell culture medium. After 48 hr, the conditioned medium was collected and centrifuged for 5 min at 400 × g. A 500 μl aliquot was concentrated to < 100 ul in a Microcon concentrator (Millipore, Billerica, MA) at 6500 × g at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined using BCA assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL), and 20 μg of the protein from each sample was electrophoresed on a 10% zymography gel containing 0.1% gelatin (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). MMP activity was detected by incubating the gel in 1× Zymogram Renaturing Buffer for 30 min at room temperature and then equilibrating the gel for 30 min at room temperature with gentle agitation. The gel was incubated with fresh 1× Zymogram Developing Buffer overnight, followed by staining with Coomassie Blue for 30 min. Contrast was adjusted by destaining with Coomassie destaining solution (Methanol: Acetic acid: Water (50: 10: 40). The staining gels were then air-dried in cellophane mounts and images were captured.
The cells were seeded in a 12-well plate (15 × 104). After the cells formed a confluent mono layer, scratches were performed using a 100 ul tip. The culture medium was replaced with fresh complete medium. The closure of scratch was analyzed under the microscope and images were captured at 18 - 24 hr after incubation.
The cells were seeded at 6 × 104 cells per well into the 96-well plate of an Oris™ Cell Invasion Assay Kit (Platypus, Madison, WI). The plate was incubated for ~16 hr at 37°C. The stoppers were then removed. Collagen I Overlay was added to create a 3-D ECM environment for invasion and incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. Cell culture medium was added and the cells were allowed to invade for 72 hr, and were stained with DAPI before images were captured.
qPCR data and cell growth data were analyzed by the Student's t-test (one-tailed). P < 0.05 was used to define statistically significant differences.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
BU and WSW designed the experiments, participated in discussion of the data and draft of the manuscript. BU conducted experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Additional figure legend. Figure legends for additional figures S1 - S4. Figure S1 Flow Cytometric Analysis of CXCR4 expression on surface of LNCAP cells stably expressing SLUG. SLUG overexpression (SLUG) and control (pMig) LNCAP cells were detached from plates with 4 mM EDTA solution when reaching 70-80% confluence. The cells were washed with 2% FBS in PBS solution and then stained with APC-labeled anti-human CXCR4 for flow cytometric analysis. Figure S2 Analysis of MMP9 expression in PC3 cells stably expressing CXCL12 shRNAs. RNA was extracted from PC3 infected with lentiviruses expressing CXCL12 shRNAs (sh1 and sh2), and used to synthesize cDNA. Transcript level of MMP9 and SLUG was analyzed by RT-PCR. GAPDH was included as a loading control. Figure S3 Cell migration assay in 22RV1 cells stably overexpressing SLUG. 22RV1 cells expressing pMig-Slug or pMig (vector) were seeded in 12-well plates (15 × 104 cells per well). After cells formed a confluent monolayer, scratches were performed using a 100 μl tip. Twenty-four hours after scratching, the cells were examined for closure of scratch under the microscope and images were captured. Figure S4 Cell growth of PC3 stably expressing different combinations of CXCL12 shRNAs and SLUG. Cell were seeded into 12 well plate (triplicates) at a density of 5 × 104 per well and viable cell numbers were counted with Beckman Vicell XR cell counter for 7 days.
Additional figures. Additional figures S1 - S4.
We thank our colleagues at Maine Medical Center Research Institute (MMCRI) for their critical review. We also thank the Cell Culture and Viral Vector Core and the Histopathology Core (supported by NIH grant P20 RR018789) at MMCRI. This work was supported by a MMC institutional support grant. W.S.W was partially supported by a K01 award from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01DK078180) and a R01 award from the National Institute of Aging (R01 AG040182).