|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
With improved combination antiretroviral therapy (ART)-related survival, diabetes and hypertension increasingly contribute to morbidity and mortality among individuals with HIV. However, there is limited data on diabetes and blood pressure control in this population. We examined whether virologic control is associated with control of diabetes and hypertension.
We examined HIV viral load, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and blood pressure measurements from 70 diabetics and 291 hypertensives in the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort, an urban, university-based cohort. All patients were treated for HIV and diabetes or hypertension. HbA1c and HIV-1 RNA were captured electronically from laboratory data, and blood pressure was collected electronically from vital signs taken at clinic visits. We used HIV-1 RNA values within 30 days of the HbA1c measurement or blood pressure measurement. The relationships between HIV-1 RNA and HbA1c and HIV-1 RNA and blood pressure were examined using separate random effects generalized least squares linear regression models.
The study sample was predominantly male and black, with a high prevalence of comorbid hepatitis C virus infection and psychiatric illness. In multivariable analysis, each log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA was associated with higher HbA1c (β=0.47 units, p<0.001) among diabetics and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) among hypertensive patients (β=1.95 mmHg, p<0.001).
Suboptimal control of HIV, indicated by detectable viral load, correlates with suboptimal control of diabetes and hypertension, indicated by higher HbA1c and MAP. Achieving control of multiple medical comorbidities and HIV simultaneously may require expansion of current adherence interventions focused primarily on antiretroviral therapy.
With the decrease in AIDS-related morbidity and mortality since the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-infected individuals are experiencing complications from other comorbid conditions including diabetes and hypertension.1–3 Both traditional diabetes risk factors and ART use contribute to diabetes prevalence among individuals with HIV.4, 5 Indeed, prevalent and incident diabetes are more common among men with HIV on ART compared to men without HIV.6 Hypertension rates are similar among individuals with HIV compared with the general population,7 and duration of ART is associated with hypertension independent of age.8 HIV, diabetes, and hypertension all require high levels of treatment adherence to achieve treatment goals and optimize clinical outcomes.9–11
Although the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension in HIV disease has been studied extensively, little data exists on diabetes and blood pressure control among individuals with HIV. Given the high level of adherence to HIV medications required to obtain viral suppression and the high level of adherence to diabetes and blood pressure medications required to control those conditions, it might be expected that individuals with better control of their HIV would also have better control of their diabetes or hypertension. However, it is unknown if control of viral load among individuals taking ART is related to control of other chronic conditions.
The current study examines the relationship between HIV control, indicated by undetectable viral load, and both diabetes control and blood pressure control. We hypothesized that poor virologic control would be associated with poor control of diabetes and hypertension.
We performed an analysis of data from the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort (JHHCC), a clinic-based observational longitudinal cohort of patients who receive primary HIV care at Johns Hopkins.
The JHHCC was initiated in 1989 to understand and quantify the processes and outcomes of care for HIV-infected patients in an urban, university-based clinical practice. Enrollment into the dynamic cohort occurs at a patient’s first visit to the Hopkins ambulatory HIV clinic. The data set includes comprehensive demographic, clinical, laboratory, pharmaceutical, and psychosocial data. Data is abstracted from medical records, electronic laboratory sources, and pharmacy claims. The details of the study design and follow-up have been described previously.12
The study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Hospital Institutional Review Board and all participants signed informed consent.
Our sample included patients on antiretroviral therapy with a provider assigned diagnosis of diabetes or hypertension, who were concurrently receiving pharmacotherapy for either their diabetes or hypertension. Patients were identified through standardized manual chart abstraction. A total of 70 individuals with diabetes and 291 individuals with hypertension were identified. Twenty-three patients had both diabetes and hypertension and were included in both analyses.
HbA1c was captured electronically from laboratory data, and included measurements from August 1998 to November 2009. Blood pressure was abstracted from the medical record at clinic visits from March 2007 to December 2009. We converted the systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements to mean arterial pressure (MAP) using the formula (1/3 * SBP + 2/3 * DBP).
The primary independent variable was HIV-1 RNA, which was log-transformed because of non-normal distribution. This laboratory value was collected within 30 days of either the HbA1c measurement or blood pressure measurement. Demographic factors of interest included age, sex, race, and HIV transmission risk factor. Clinical variables extracted from the database included CD4 cell count (dichotomized to greater than or less than 200 cells/mL), type of antiretroviral therapy (protease inhibitor-containing combination ART vs. non-protease inhibitor containing ART), baseline substance abuse, hepatitis C status (presence of antibody to hepatitis C virus electronically captured through laboratory data) and presence of a psychiatric disorder. Baseline substance abuse was defined as self-reported alcohol use (daily or heavy), heroin use, cocaine use, or intravenous drug use (IVDU) as an HIV transmission risk factor. Presence of a psychiatric disorder was determined by manual abstraction of psychiatric and medical records by trained abstractors, and included diagnoses of major depression, depression with psychotic features, generalized anxiety disorder, mania, personality disorder, and schizophrenia. Finally, for the diabetic patients, we determined whether they were on insulin therapy (alone or with other agents) at the time of their first HbA1c measurement as a marker of disease severity.
We generated summary statistics for demographic and clinical characteristics, considering the diabetic and hypertensive patients separately. We examined the relationship between HIV-1 RNA and both HbA1c and MAP using random effects generalized least squares linear regression to account for repeated measures from individual participants. HIV-1 RNA, HbA1c, and MAP were all examined as continuous variables. We performed both bivariate and multivariate analyses using separate models for the two outcomes.
The following variables were considered as potential confounders in the two multivariate analyses: age, sex, race, CD4 cell count, baseline substance abuse, and presence of a psychiatric disorder. We controlled for these variables and for additional variables (PI-containing ART and Hepatitis C status in the diabetes analysis) based on previous research. In the diabetes analysis, we adjusted for insulin use.
All analyses were performed using the STATA statistical package version 11.0 (College Station, Texas).
Table 1 presents the distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics among HIV-infected individuals with diabetes and hypertension in the cohort. Our study sample was predominantly male and black, and there was a high prevalence of IVDU as an HIV transmission risk factor, as well as comorbid HCV and psychiatric illness. Mean age (SD) was 44.7 years (9.9 years) for those diagnosed with diabetes and 45.3 years (9.3 years) for those diagnosed with hypertension. Mean (SD) baseline BMI was 25.8 kg/m2 (6.9 kg/m2) among those with diabetes with height and weight data available (N=42) and 26.2 kg/m2 (6.0 kg/m2) among those with hypertension with height and weight data available (N=211).
Using the baseline data for diabetic patients, the median HbA1c was 7.3% (IQR = 6 to 9.8%). The range was 3.4 to 18.6%. The median log10 HIV-1 RNA was 2.1 (IQR = 1.7 to 3.3), corresponding to a median HIV-RNA of 126 copies/mL (IQR = 50 to 1995 copies/mL). Using the baseline data for hypertensive patients, the median MAP was 99.3 mmHg (IQR = 90.3 to 107.3 mmHg). The range was 66.0 to 134.7 mmHg. The median log10 HIV-1 RNA was 1.7 (IQR = 1.7 to 2.6), corresponding to a median HIV-RNA of 50 copies/mL (IQR = 50 to 398 copies/mL).
Our analysis of the relationship between log viral load and HbA1c included 420 HbA1c observations from 70 patients (mean number of HbA1c observations per patient = 6.0, range 1 to 28). An increase of one log10 in the HIV-1 RNA level was associated with higher HbA1c (β=0.43 units, p<0.001) in unadjusted analysis. Table 2 shows the association between increasing log10 HIV-1 RNA and higher HbA1c (β=0.47 units, p<0.001), which was preserved in multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, race, age, PI-containing ART, CD4 level, substance abuse, presence of a psychiatric disorder, hepatitis C status, and insulin use.
Our analysis in those with hypertension included 1058 observations from 291 patients (mean number of blood pressure observations per patient = 3.6, range 1 to 13). An increase of one log10 in the HIV-1 RNA level was associated with increasing mean arterial pressure (MAP) (β=1.90 mmHg, p<0.001) in unadjusted analysis. Table 3 shows the association between increasing log10 HIV-1 RNA and higher MAP (β=1.95, p<0.001), which was preserved in multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, race age, CD4 level, substance abuse, and presence of a psychiatric disorder.
In this study of patients with HIV and diabetes or hypertension, increasing HIV-1 RNA was associated with higher HbA1c and higher MAP. This is the first study to demonstrate that poor control of HIV-1 RNA is directly correlated with poor control of diabetes and hypertension, two comorbidities of increasing importance in the management of the patients with HIV infection. We suspect that adherence accounts for our findings, and that poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy correlates with poor adherence to therapy for other medical comorbidities, explaining the relationship between poor control of both conditions.
There are possible alternate explanations for the observed association. Uncontrolled HIV causes systemic inflammation,13 and may contribute to both the development of hypertension and diabetes and to difficulty controlling the conditions. Therapeutic inertia, or failure to increase therapy despite unmet treatment goals, may also hinder control, 14 and may be more pronounced in patients with multiple chronic conditions, especially if they are unrelated chronic conditions.15 Among individuals with HIV, especially those with poor control of their HIV or infectious complications related to immune compromise, less priority may be given to managing their diabetes and hypertension. We found only a weak association between CD4 count and HbA1c, and no association between CD4 count and MAP, suggesting that the level of immunosuppression does not play a significant role. Irrespective of the reason for poor control of both conditions, our study emphasizes the new challenges of multi-morbidity, and suggests that interventions targeting both patients and providers may be needed.
Three prior studies of diabetes control in HIV disease have been conducted. The most recent study by Satlin and colleagues revealed that about one-third of patients in the study sample did not meet American Diabetes Association (ADA) HbA1c goals and over half did not meet blood pressure goals. Similar proportions of patients with adequate and inadequate glycemic control had an undetectable viral load (p=0.21).16 Another study involving 40 HIV-infected diabetics demonstrated that fewer than half of patients attained ADA hemoglobin A1c and blood pressure targets. Undetectable viral load was associated with not meeting LDL and total cholesterol goals.17 A third study examined glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control among 216 HIV-infected diabetic patients from an urban clinic,18 finding that 54% of patients met the ADA HbA1c target and 65% reached the blood pressure target. The authors noted that an undetectable HIV viral load was associated with being less likely to meet total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol targets, which they attributed to antiretroviral-induced hyperlipidemia. There was no mention of an association between HbA1c at goal or blood pressure at goal and undetectable viral load. Our study expands on prior research by examining the relationship between HIV control and diabetes and hypertension control, with the ultimate goal of understanding how to optimize control of multiple conditions simultaneously.
The prevalence of diabetes in individuals with HIV has been reported as ranging from 2–12%, 6, 19 and diabetes has been associated with antiretroviral therapy, particularly with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.20, 21 The overall prevalence of hypertension among HIV-infected individuals was 31.7% (56.4% in men older than 50) in a large cohort study with HIV-uninfected controls,8 with no difference in hypertension prevalence by HIV status. Both conditions contribute to cardiovascular and renal disease and may increase non-HIV related morbidity and mortality in this population.22 Controlling multiple comorbidities is increasingly important as the population of individuals with HIV in the United States ages. In 2008, almost twenty percent of new HIV cases in the U.S. occurred in individuals aged 50 and older.23 An aging population with HIV faces complications from both long-term metabolic toxicities of ART and common medical comorbidities whose prevalence increases with increasing age, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease.24 Mortality in older individuals with HIV is higher than in younger individuals with HIV,25 the result of both infectious complications and medical comorbidities, and achieving good control of other medical comorbidities in addition to HIV is necessary to decrease mortality in older individuals.
The challenges of multi-morbidity are pronounced for individuals who receive HIV care, as competing priorities make adhering to complex medication regimens difficult. Up to 50% of patients (irrespective of comorbidity) do not take their medications as prescribed, resulting in significant morbidity and cost.26, 27 Despite the importance of adherence in HIV clinical care,13, 28 antiretroviral adherence is suboptimal: a meta-analysis of HIV treatment adherence interventions revealed baseline adherence rates of 55–95% among all participants.29
Similar to HIV, uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension are often caused by poor adherence29 Only about twelve percent of diabetics meet ADA goals for lipid, blood pressure, and glycemic control simultaneously30 and around 35% of hypertensives have controlled blood pressure.31 Self-reported medication adherence is associated with lower HbA1c in diabetes,32, 33 and high adherence to antihypertensive therapy has been associated with blood pressure control.34 Sub-optimal adherence stems from a variety of factors which can be categorized as patient-level barriers, patient-provider barriers, and patient-system barriers.27, 35 Patient-level barriers include low self-efficacy, low literacy, substance abuse and depression.36 These are compounded by patient-provider and patient-system barriers such as poor communication and misunderstanding of treatment instructions, poverty, poor education and housing, lack of insurance and medication costs.37–39
Our study has several potential limitations. Although HbA1c is used clinically in the management of HIV-infected diabetics, it underestimates glycemia.40 This effect should be evenly distributed throughout all study participants, however, and should not affect the associations detected. Blood pressure measurements were part of the routine vital signs measurement done at clinic visits and were not standardized. In addition, we do not have a direct measure of adherence, such as patient self-report, electronic monitoring caps, pill counts, or pharmacy refill data.41 Suppressed viral load is an accepted surrogate for treatment adherence, despite the fact that less than perfect adherence may also result in undetectable viral load.36
Our results demonstrate that poor HIV control is related to poor control of diabetes and hypertension, and we suspect that poor adherence to therapy for HIV is correlated with poor adherence to therapy for other conditions. Research on how patients prioritize medications for their comorbidities in relation to their HIV medications could shape future treatment adherence programs as our patient population ages and more individuals develop comorbid conditions. The most successful adherence programs combine several interventions such as incorporating behavioral interventions with education and increased convenience of care.42 They are typically long-term, individually-tailored interventions focused on practical medication management skills.29, 43 Our results argue that the scope of these programs should be expanded to include both antiretroviral agents and agents for other comorbidities.
Sources of Support: This work was supported by NIAAA K23 AA015313, NIH R01 DA11602, K24 DA00432, and R01 AA16893.
Conflicts of Interest: Drs. Monroe, Chander, and Moore have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Parts of this data were presented in abstract from at the Society of General Internal Medicine 33rd Annual Meeting, April 28-May 1, 2010, Minneapolis, Minnesota