PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Prog Neurobiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3223355
NIHMSID: NIHMS315847

Staging Alzheimer’s Disease Progression with Multimodality Neuroimaging

Abstract

Rapid developments in medical neuroimaging have made it possible to reconstruct the trajectory of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as it spreads through the living brain. The current review focuses on the progressive signature of brain changes throughout the different stages of AD. We integrate recent findings on changes in cortical gray matter volume, white matter fiber tracts, neuropathological alterations, and brain metabolism assessed with molecular positron emission tomography (PET). Neurofibrillary tangles accumulate first in transentorhinal and cholinergic brain areas, and 4-D maps of cortical volume changes show early progressive temporo-parietal cortical thinning. Findings from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for assessment fiber tract integrity show cortical disconnection in corresponding brain networks. Importantly, the developmental trajectory of brain changes is not uniform and may be modulated by several factors such as onset of disease mechanisms, risk-associated and protective genes, converging comorbidity, and individual brain reserve. There is a general agreement between in vivo brain maps of cortical atrophy and amyloid pathology assessed through PET, reminiscent of post mortem histopathology studies that paved the way in the staging of AD. The association between in vivo and post mortem findings will clarify the temporal dynamics of pathophysiological alterations in the development of preclinical AD. This will be important in designing effective treatments that target specific underlying disease AD mechanisms.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, AD, mild cognitive impairment, MCI, pre-dementia, pre-clinical, pre-symptomatic, biological markers, neuroimaging, multimodal, neuropathology, neuroanatomy, computational, MRI, fMRI, DTI, VBM, DBM, tractography, drug development, clinical trials, CSF, staging, progression, diagnosis, classification, early detection, prediction, biological activity, ADNI, EADNI, regulatory authorities, FDA, EMEA

1. Introduction

AD is a complex and chronic non-linear progressive neurodegenerative disorder, and is the most common cause of dementia among the elderly. At some point of disease progression, the extent of neuronal loss and dysfunction increases; cortical and subcortical brain regions are gradually and subsequently more severely affected at different stages of AD severity. Multiple lines of research indicate that neuronal degeneration in AD is not random but shows a characteristic anatomical sequence as the pathology advances over several decades. Establishing an accurate dynamic map of this sequence is vital for understanding and mapping the complex endophenotype of AD, providing a basis for successfully evaluating treatments designed to resist or prevent disease progression.

New models of the degenerative sequence have recently been developed based on new technologies that track AD pathology as it spreads through the living brain. These dynamic maps reveal the anatomical substrate of the trajectory of cognitive dysfunction, and can help to predict the course of cognitive decline and the onset of psychiatric symptoms including depression, aggression, psychosis and agitation that may occur at different stages of AD. Better modeling of disease progression in individual subjects will provide significant advantages in predicting when a cognitive ability may break down and when social or behavioral abnormalities may result. Biomarker based staging models (Jack et al., 2010) will further allow to evaluate treatment effects of novel drugs in clinical trials on the basis of a drug’s effect on slowing down or halting the transition among different stages in the development of neuronal degeneration. Successfully establishing the multimodal AD biomarker signature during the course of AD will further support the development of surrogate biomarkers that are vitally needed as outcomes for clinical trials of disease modifying drug candidates (for reviews see (Hampel et al., 2010a; Hampel et al., 2010b).

The first evidence that AD progresses in stages came from post-mortem examinations of clinically stratified samples, establishing a sequence of early pathological changes in the transentorhinal and entorhinal cortex that spread subsequently to the hippocampus and adjacent allocortical areas and finally neocortical areas (Braak and Braak, 1991). The cortical changes are paralleled by a somatotopic degeneration of cholinergic neurons in the nucleus basalis of Meynert, which accounts for the documented, but limited, efficacy of cholinergic drugs in treating the illness in its early clinical stages (Mesulam, 2004). The earliest neurofibrillary changes have been found in the transentorhinal region, but also the dorsal raphe nuclei (Grinberg et al., 2009) and basal nucleus of Meynert (NbM) (Sassin et al., 2000), and by using cytoarchitectonic maps from a post mortem brain specimen in MRI space (Teipel et al., 2005; Zaborszky et al., 2008) and three independent studies showed significant atrophy of gray matter in cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis of Meynert in predementia stages of AD (Grothe et al., 2010; Teipel et al., 2005; Teipel et al., 2010b). Taken together these findings point to a possible multilocular onset of the neurodegenerative stage of the disease.

A growing number of neuroimaging studies have assessed the path of neuronal degeneration of AD, making it possible to relate regional topological maps of cortical degeneration to changes in brain function and specific cognitive abilities across different stages of AD. Novel MRI processing algorithms can now reconstruct the profile of thinning in cortical gray matter, and the presence of cortical plaque and tangle pathology (Sowell et al., 2003). These methods have visualized complex spatial patterns of correlated brain changes and mapped these along the time axis of AD development (Lerch et al., 2005). Efforts are also underway to interlink MRI- and PET-based findings with the post-mortem staging model of AD core pathology and neuronal loss.

The current review discusses new insights from neuroimaging at several levels of analysis including cortical functional changes, molecular imaging, and structural volumetric assessments, as well as post-mortem MRI validations. We integrate these findings to provide a unified perspective on the spatio-temporal evolution of AD. We relate the characteristic sequence of neuropathology in AD to different factors influencing neuronal vulnerability in cortical networks, including specific developmental, metabolic and morphological characteristics of neurons. The level of axonal myelination also influences a neuron’s vulnerability to AD pathology, as does the glial environment. Those axonal projections that have the most protracted maturational time-course, and develop in the later ontogenetic stages, such as the medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex, tend to show increased vulnerability in AD (Bartzokis et al., 2004; Reisberg et al., 2002; Reisberg et al., 1999b). AD pathology may progress along neuroanatomical connections of cortical networks, and genetic and epigenetic variability in brain development may play a role. Although AD pathology has a characteristic pattern of progression, prior studies have used different techniques to observe different aspects of the disease process. Here we integrate the wealth of reported neuroimaging findings derived from different acquisition, processing and analysis modalities and methods to provide a unified model of AD neurodegeneration.

2. Cortical atrophy in the development of AD

As AD progresses, prominent brain changes are observed on structural MRI, including widespread cortical atrophy, profound tissue loss in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobes, and expansions of the ventricular and sulcal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces. Cortical gray matter atrophy is detectable through high resolution 3D MR imaging, and is believed to be a reasonable proxy for neuronal loss (Smith, 2002), although it likely reflects the combined effects of neuronal shrinkage and death, neuropil loss, and intracortical myelin reduction (Duyckaerts and Dickson, 2003).

Techniques developed in the last decade have enabled researchers to quantify gray matter atrophy in 3-dimensional detail, across the cortex, mapping its profile with exquisite accuracy (Ashburner et al., 2003). Some of the most sophisticated methods rely on alignment of cortical features such as gyral/sulcal landmarks identified by hand, or with computer vision approaches. This is then followed by statistically-guided detection of subtle brain changes associated with prognosis, treatment, or other factors of interest. One such technique, termed cortical pattern matching (Thompson et al., 2003) allows accurate registration of cortical sulci and gyri in different subjects to a reference template, following manual tracing of 39 sulcal lines as landmarks on each 3D rendered brain. Measures of cortical atrophy from hundreds of subjects may then be integrated or compared across groups. Although time consuming, this technique has mapped the dynamic progression of atrophy through the cortex in patients scanned repeatedly as their disease progresses from moderate to severe AD (Thompson et al., 2003; Frisoni et al., 2009). A similar travelling development of advancing pathology is seen in the hippocampus (Apostolova et al., 2010a).

On average, patients with moderate AD have gray matter reductions, relative to matched healthy controls, of 15% or more in the medial temporal, posterior cingulate, temporal, and temporoparietal cortices. Gray matter loss also progresses at a rate of 3–4% per year in most of these regions (Thompson et al., 2003). Similar cross-sectional results have been obtained with more automated voxel-based mapping techniques, revealing systematic patterns of gray matter volume loss (Baron et al., 2001; Chetelat et al., 2002; Chetelat et al., 2005; Frisoni, 2000; Karas et al., 2004) and reductions in cortical thickness at specific clinically-defined stages of disease progression (Lerch et al., 2005). Sowell et al. (Sowell et al., 2003) applied a cortical pattern matching technique, which combines cortical thickness data from many subjects, to compute the mean anatomical trajectory of gray matter thinning over the human lifespan, in healthy normal subjects. Gray matter thickness was computed at each cortical point, in 176 scans of subjects aged 7 to 87. The frontal cortex underwent rapid thinning in late adolescence, perhaps reflecting dendritic pruning and progressive myelination within the cortex, but it was only late in life that a downswing in temporal gray matter occurred. Supporting the validity of these cortical measures, there was a close regional correspondence between population-based maps of cortical thickness created from in vivo MRI (Sowell et al., 2003) and the 1929 post mortem data of von Economo (Von Economo, 1929).

More recent work has found that this thinning of the frontal and language cortex is related to distinct changes in cognitive skills (Lu et al., 2009), and frontal cortical thickness predicts amygdala reactivity on fMRI (Foland-Ross et al., 2010). A related study by Gogtay et al. (Gogtay et al., 2004) created a time-lapse map of cortical development from ages 4 to 22, and showed that the earliest maturing cortex is least vulnerable to aging and AD. This phenomenon (Figure 1) is sometimes referred to as retrogenesis (Reisberg et al., 1999a); it suggests that the most heavily myelinated cortex is relatively resistant to AD pathology. Greater myelination may protect neurons against metabolic stress during the maintenance of the action potential along axons (Arendt et al., 1998). As is visually evident in the time-lapse maps, the maturational sequence in childhood proceeds in a pattern opposite to the classical neurodegenerative sequence in AD (Gogtay and Thompson, 2009).

Figure 1
Degenerative sequence of brain changes in AD is the reverse order of the normal developmental sequence

The progression of cortical atrophy is also tightly linked with progressive decline in specific cognitive domains (Thompson et al., 2007). Performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (Folstein et al., 1975), a widely used global measure of cognition in AD, is strongly correlated with gray matter integrity in the entorhinal, parahippocampal, precuneus, superior parietal, and subgenual cingulate/orbitofrontal cortices (Apostolova et al., 2006). More selective correlations have also been discovered, suggesting that specific cognitive domains may be differentially affected by AD-related atrophy in specific cortical regions. For instance, cortical atrophy in the anterior cingulate and supplementary motor cortices was associated with apathy in patients with AD (Apostolova et al., 2007). Furthermore, linear regression models, fitted at each location on the cortex, detected associations between the degree of language impairment and increasing atrophy of the left temporal and parietal cortices – regions critically involved in language production and comprehension (Apostolova et al., 2008). Although cognitive decline in multiple domains is typical in AD, studies of brain development in childhood also suggest that motor and language performance is selectively linked with cortical morphometry in the regions subserving those tasks (Lu et al., 2007).

Brain tissue loss in early AD has been investigated longitudinally and cross-sectionally in several studies that are highly consistent in their anatomical patterns (Bakkour et al., 2008; Dickerson and Sperling, 2008; Whitwell et al., 2007; Whitwell et al., 2008). As such, 3D maps of cortical thickness or gray matter density have become widely accepted as a structural correlate of functional decline in AD, and have been related to other neuroimaging measures of cortical pathology, such as functional MRI (fMRI) activation (Dickerson and Sperling, 2008), metabolism (Apostolova et al., 2009) or molecular pathology at the group level (Braskie et al., 2008).

3. Tracking pathology with PET

PET scanning has long been used to reveal reductions in cerebral blood flow and metabolism in AD, and is valuable for the differential diagnosis of dementia in individual patients (see (Silverman and Thompson, 2006) for a review). Hypometabolism of the posterior cingulate cortex, for example, is observed early in AD using fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning, even when no atrophy is detectable on MRI (Mosconi et al., 2004). As AD progresses, there is widespread decreased cerebral metabolism and perfusion in posterior cingulate and association cortices, but the basal ganglia and thalamus, cerebellum, and primary sensorimotor cortices are largely spared until later stages of the disease (Apostolova et al., 2010b). More recently, there has been renewed interest in tracking AD with PET, using new molecular probes sensitive to amyloid-beta (Aβ) or neurofibrillary tangle pathology, or both types of pathology (Braskie et al., 2008; Klunk et al., 2004; Mintun et al., 2006; Small et al., 2006). To better understand how Aβ load spreads in the living brain, Braskie et al. (Braskie et al., 2008) applied cortical pattern matching to 23 subjects (10 controls, 6 subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 7 AD) scanned with both MRI and a recently developed PET ligand sensitive to plaque and tangle pathology ([18F]FDDNP (Small et al., 2006)). Figure 2 shows two frames from an animation sequence that shows the degree of amyloid burden, for different levels of cognitive impairment. The advance of pathology largely follows the known trajectory of neurofibrillary tangle accumulation (Braak and Braak, 1995). Related work by Mintun et al. (Mintun et al., 2006) and Rowe et al. (Rowe et al., 2007) using an amyloid-sensitive tracer termed Pittsburgh Compound B ([11C]PIB) shows frontal lobe labeling early in the degenerative sequence. The PIB deposition pattern is consistent with the Braak trajectory for amyloid deposition, which, unlike tangle deposition, shows early increases in the basal neocortex, particularly in frontal and temporal lobes and primarily in poorly myelinated regions such as the perirhinal cortex. These PET changes may occur at a much earlier stage of the disease than cortical thinning – amyloid PET appears to detect abnormal brain changes earlier than gray matter measures, and is also correlated with subclinical cognitive decline even in normal subjects (Braskie et al., 2008; Small et al., 2007). PET measures of cerebral plaque and tangle burden may also be used to predict a person’s Mini-Mental State Exam score, with reasonable accuracy (Protas et al., 2010). The ability of [11C]PIB to detect specific insoluble A-beta fractions was confirmed in an autoradiographic study on human brain specimens showing specific binding in temporal, parietal and frontal lobe gray matter in AD brains compared to controls (Svedberg et al., 2008). Despite these findings, [11C]PIB did not show significant progression of amyloid binding over 2 years follow up in AD patients (Engler et al., 2006). It is still unresolved whether this reflects a ceiling effect of amyloid binding in clinically manifest AD or an artefact from the lack of a dynamic quantification model of [11C]PIB binding that controls for perfusion effects.

Figure 2
Progression of AD based on pathology, MRI, and the amyloid-sensitive Probe, [18F] FDDNP PET

Whether each imaging modality can detect changes depends on the population studied, the sample sizes, and details of signal reconstruction, partial volume correction, and registration. As such, it is difficult to make absolute statements about how the binding of various PET ligands (FDDNP versus PIB, or others) relate chronologically to each other and to cortical thinning and post mortem histology, unless all measures are compared head-to-head in the same subjects, which is logistically challenging. Initial studies show a dissociation between local [11C]PIB binding (high in frontal lobes) and cortical atrophy (high in temporal lobes) (Jack et al., 2008). This raises questions about the functional relevance of amyloid deposition for regional neuronal loss in AD. A combined [11C]PIB/structural MR study, however, has shown that, despite the relatively low amount of amyloid deposition in the medial temporal lobe, amyloid deposition at a more global level in the brain is strongly related to atrophy of the hippocampus (Apostolova et al., 2010; Frisoni et al., 2009). It is still unknown whether this amyloid related atrophy in the medial temporal lobe is due to specific amyloid fragments being deposited in the medial temporal lobe or to local lower resilience of the neuronal tissue. Even so, in normal elderly subjects amyloid-sensitive PET signals correlate with cognitive performance and brain atrophy in cortical areas that deteriorate earliest in AD (Bourgeat et al., 2010; Chételat et al., 2010; Mormino et al., 2009). Amyloid PET may therefore be useful for early detection of prodromal AD before symptoms are prominent.

4. Progressive degeneration along anatomical fiber connections

Neuronal activity in different brain regions does not occur independently, and is organized in non-randomly interconnected neuronal networks. According to the retrogenesis model mentioned above, ontologically late-myelinating brain regions such as the prefrontal and other association cortices, and basal and parahippocampal cortices that develop until the 5th decade during life (Bartzokis, 2004), show the highest susceptibility to neuropathological insult (Bartzokis et al., 2006).

DTI can be used to map microstructural white matter integrity (Basser and Jones, 2002; Mori and van Zijl, 2002), and their changes with aging over the lifespan and in neurodegenerative diseases (Kochunov et al., 2010). In agreement with the retrogenesis hypothesis, studies showed that region specific decline in fractional anisotropy (FA), a measure of fiber tract integrity, is primarily present in intra-cortical late-myelinating white matter in brain regions such as inferior longitudinal fasciculus, prefrontal cortex white matter, and temporo-parietal brain regions, but relative preservation in early myelinating white matter such as (extra-) pyramidal pathways and sensorimotor cortex and cerebellar peduncle in patients with AD (Chua et al., 2009; Stricker et al., 2009; Teipel et al., 2007a). While there is significant variability among DTI studies on MCI and AD (Sexton et al., 2010), a large number of studies report decreased fiber integrity within the parahippocampus, hippocampus, posterior cingulum, and splenium already at the stage of MCI (Chua et al., 2009; Takahashi et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2007; Zhuang et al., 2010). These brain regions are part of the Papez circuit underlying episodic memory and show correlated changes in AD (Avants et al., 2010; Teipel et al., 2007b; Teipel et al., 2007c). Thus, in addition to retrogenesis it is also possible that the distribution of early fiber projection follows that of anatomical and functional connectivity. Possible mechanism of propagating white matter degeneration within neuronal networks include Wallerian neurodegeneration or backward degeneration in which neuronal grey matter atrophy is followed by axonal degeneration (Coleman, 2005), and first DTI studies have now begun to differentiate different mechanisms underlying fiber tract changes (Di Paola et al., 2010; Pievani et al., 2010; Stricker et al., 2009). First longitudinal studies on DTI changes suggest a high temporal rate of fiber tract deterioration along association fiber tracts in aging and MCI (Barrick et al., 2010; Teipel et al., 2010c), and longitudinal studies in joint assessment with functional and structural studies, using elegant advanced methods such as joint multimodal independent component analysis (Calhoun et al., 2009), will be needed to confirm cross-sectionally observed association between functional and structural network changes (Koch et al., 2010; Teipel et al., 2010a). Recent studies have begun to integrate different neuroimaging modalities for diagnostic puposes in AD, e.g. including modalities such as MRI and FDG-PET (Hinrichs et al., 2011). functional MRI and structural MRI (Fan et al., 2008), or DTI and DBM (Friese et al., 2010). The spatial pattern of DTI derived indices of fiber tract integrity and the spatial distribution of atrophic changes are only partially overlapping and may complement each other in defining AD specific patterns of brain changes (Figure 6). It remains to be determined exactly which spatial patterns of brain changes across different modalities provide additive information to improve the prediction of AD at the early stages of the disease.

Figure 6
Combination of DTI and DBM Brain Differences to Diagnose Alzheimer’s Disease

5. Moderating factors in the development of AD related brain changes

Neuropathology progresses with a relatively stereotyped sequence of involvement of brain structures (Braak and Braak, 1991), but the onset and progression of clinical symptoms are remarkably variable across patients and are critically affected by the resilience of the individual brain to molecular mechanisms and neuropathology, also referred to as brain reserve which has been defined to mean that “individual differences in the brain itself allow some people to cope better than others with brain pathology” (in (Stern, 2009), p.2016). The concept refers to the structural and functional redundancy of brain networks that determines where the threshold is set for a given individual. Brain reserve may result from structural brain properties: persons with higher neuronal or synaptic counts have greater brain reserve and can withstand more pathology before performance is affected. As a result, they develop symptoms later in the biological course of AD, when a larger number of neurons or synapses has been damaged. Functional brain reserve (Caroli et al., 2010 (a)) may result from activation of brain structures or networks not normally used by individuals with intact brains to compensate for brain damage (Galluzzi et al., 2008; Vernooij et al., 2009). Although the concept of brain reserve is largely a hypothetical construct still under experimental testing, some neuroimaging studies provide empirical support (Cohen et al., 2009; Kemppainen et al., 2008). It can be speculated that the breakdown of functional networks correlates with cognitive impairment, where initial hyperactivity of functional brain networks during mild stage of cognitive impairment turns into brain activation deficits at stages of more severe cognitive impairment (Celone et al., 2006), for review see (Bokde et al., 2009)).

Brain reserve is modulated by innate and acquired factors such as education, cognitive and physical stimulation during life, stress and trauma, epigenetic factors, protective and risk genes, such as the ApoE genotype (and e.g. PICALM, Clusterin, complement receptor gene 1), non-AD age-associated changes, and converging comorbidity, such as cerebrovascular, endocrine and metabolic alterations. The ApoE e4 allele (ApoE4) is the strongest known genetic risk factor for late-onset sporadic AD and was found associated with deficits in glucose metabolism in the very same neocortical areas affected by AD, i.e. the temporoparietal and posterior cingulate cortex (Reiman et al., 1996) and with abnormal Aβ load as measured with PIB and CSF based biomarkers of Aβ (Reiman et al., 2009; Vemuri et al., 2010). ApoE4 carriers also have abnormally enlarged ventricles (Chou et al., 2008) and faster rates of hippocampal atrophy in MCI and even in AD. A rarer allelic variant, ApoE2, found in around one-sixth of healthy controls, is also known to be protective on brain structural damage (Hua et al., 2008). The notion that Aβ pathology accumulates in the brain decades before the onset of memory symptoms (Smith, 2002) temptingly leads to the hypothesis that these metabolic deficits are the very earliest signs of AD. However, ApoE-related functional brain alterations have been reported to occur at the much earlier age of 20 to 39 years (Reiman et al., 2004; Scarmeas et al., 2005; Scarmeas et al., 2003), a time when plaque and tangle accumulation is highly unlikely. This and other evidence on the effect of ApoE4 on normal brain structure and function (Filippini et al., 2009) and on the cortical morphology of children and adolescents (Shaw et al., 2007) suggest that early genetically-related developmental brain features may predispose to the development of AD-related changes in later life and may thus alter the course of AD in a specific way. The modulatory effect of ApoE on brain plasticity impacting the AD endophenotype is suggested by a study that showed greater memory deficits and medial temporal lobe atrophy in ApoE4 carriers in contrast with greater language deficits and frontal atrophy in non-carriers (Wolk et al., 2010).

In a similar vein, alterations in brain function and fiber integrity in late life may be influenced by developmental brain changes occurring as early as in adolescence (Chiang et al., 2010; Thompson et al., 2001). Commonly-carried genetic variants, such as the obesity gene, FTO (Ho et al., 2010c), and the brain derived neurotrophic growth factor gene, BDNF, have been found to influence brain volume and fiber integrity throughout life (Chiang et al., 2009). There is also growing evidence that non-genetic “lifestyle” factors, such as cardiovascular exercise, diet, education, and body mass index are also important in for modulating brain atrophy (Ho et al., 2010a; Ho et al., 2010b), as well as risk for AD and other dementias. One intriguing study assessed 40 surviving participants of the Scottish Mental Survey in the year 1932 who remained free of dementia. Their DTI assessed fiber tract integrity was shown to correlate with cognitive performance on a number of psychometric tests, but controlling for IQ at age 11 years attenuated this association by approximately 85%, indicating that diffusion parameters in old age might be largely influenced by developmental factors at a young age (Deary et al., 2006). This suggests that studies on white matter changes in adult and older persons should be thoroughly re-evaluated, and it opens a window of opportunity for the study of innate factors on age-associated changes in later life.

In addition, environmental factors, alone or in interaction with genetic predispositions may influence brain reserve through its effect on cognitive reserve. PET studies have shown more pronounced metabolic impairment or higher amyloid load in AD patients with higher level of education compared to patients with lower education at the same level of cognitive impairment (Kemppainen et al., 2008; Perneczky et al., 2006). These findings suggest that education level as a surrogate marker of cognitive reserve helps subjects to maintain cognitive performance despite a more severe pattern of cortical damage. Similar findings have been shown based on brain atrophy and subcortical white matter microstructure using DTI (Kidron et al., 1997; Teipel et al., 2009). By late adolescence, environmental factors begin to outweigh innate genetic factors in their effects on white matter microstructure (Chiang et al., 2010). The effect of age of disease onset on the disease phenotype has been explored using structural MRI (Frisoni et al., 2007). In general, a lower level of molecular pathology may be sufficient for older persons to show cognitive symptoms, as they have lower functional reserve. In groups of patients with comparable levels of cognitive decline, the average gray matter loss was 19.5% in early-onset AD but only about half as great (11.9%) in late-onset AD, relative to appropriately matched healthy controls. Interestingly, not only was tissue loss more severe in early-versus late-onset AD, but neocortical regions were more affected in early-onset and medial temporal regions in late-onset patients (Frisoni et al., 2007; Frisoni et al., 2005; Grady et al., 1987; Seltzer and Sherwin, 1983). This agrees with neuropsychological studies indicating that neocortical functions (aphasia, apraxia, agnosia) are more affected in early-onset AD and medial temporal functions (verbal and non-verbal learning) in late-onset AD (Grady et al., 1987; Jacobs et al., 1994). The complex interplay between innate and acquired factors can be appreciated in view of the hypothesis that age at onset might be a function of the rate of deposition of the neuropathological AD lesions, which may be affected by ApoE (Lambert et al., 2005; Tiraboschi et al., 2004).

Ongoing large-scale multi-center international study programs, such as the worldwide Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI, http://www.adni-info.org/), are now beginning to integrate structural, metabolic, perfusion, and amyloid imaging in a prospective design along with variables that may mediate the progress of pathology such as genetic variables, reserve capacity and other yet to be discovered factors to capture the complexities of cerebral disease progression in AD.

6. Conclusion

Evidence indicates rapid progress in our understanding of the trajectory of AD in the living brain. The characteristic sequences of AD pathology were first discovered based on post mortem maps of plaque and tangle accumulation; these maps bear a remarkable similarity to the recently re-constructed dynamic maps of cortical atrophy in living patients, scanned sequentially with MRI. The advent of PET ligands sensitive to AD pathology has also allowed the pathological sequence to be tracked at an earlier stage of the illness, perhaps before substantial neuronal loss has set in. In parallel with these neuroimaging developments, there is a continued need to integrate detailed post mortem assessments with pre-mortem PET, MRI and diffusion tensor data to establish the cellular and molecular basis of the observed changes. This effort will require large harmonized multicenter datasets such as those being collected in North America, Europe and elsewhere (Frisoni et al., 2008; Mueller et al., 2005) as well as the combined expertise of molecular biologists, neuropathologists, imaging scientists, and computer scientists to develop standard operational procedures to assess disease biomarkers. Several lines of research require future rigorous study. Clinical-pathological correlations are needed to further validate the utility of MRI data as surrogate marker of synaptic and neuronal loss. It should be noted that most studies on disease progression presented here are based on cross-sectional assessment. Conclusions concerning the brain changes derived from cross-sectional studies, however, can be confounded with cohort effects that may result from historic differences in experiences and environmental exposures including famines, changes in educational system, nutrition etc. Such factors may be shared only by specific age groups and could thus potentially influence age-related brain differences. Longitudinal studies are needed to measures brain changes within the same individuals over time, independently of such cohort effects. However, longitudinal studies are expensive, suffer from subject-drop out over time and often span a relatively short period of follow up. Large-scale longitudinal studies with repeated multimodal neuroimaging assessments such as ADNI or Australian Imaging Biomarkers & Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing (AIBL, http://www.aibl.csiro.au/) are expected to produce data to address these concerns. Mathematical models to asses longitudinal changes have been developed and have begun to be validated (Caroli and Frisoni, 2010). Finally, the clinical relevance of these new technologies has to be assessed in large-scale controlled international multi-center clinical trials examining diagnostic and predictive utility and mapping of treatment effects with different neuroimaging modalities. This is even more important with the ongoing development of new anti-dementia treatments that require easily accessible, cost-effective and non-invasive techniques to diagnose AD in its early stages and to detect beneficial or detrimental effects supported by outcome and surrogate biomarkers of novel treatments with high accuracy and power.

Figure 3
Effect of Formalin Fixation on the Human Brain
Figure 4
Examples of High Quality Post-Mortem MRI in situ.
Figure 5
MRI Guided Sampling of Regions of Interest on Histological Sections

Validation of the staging model of neuronal atrophy: Combined MRI and histochemical approaches

In vivo MRI volumetric studies in humans have identified the same regions with early atrophy within the hippocampus corresponding to those cytoarchitectural regions (CA1 and subiculum) as those detected by pathology (Frisoni et al., 2008a; Apostolova et al., 2008; Frisoni et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2006).

To date, the resolution of most state-of-the-art MR scanners (typically 0.5 mm to 1 mm) is lower than the resolution of neurohistological and immunohistochemical methods. Therefore, in vivo MRI cannot confirm the cellular basis of the frequently described subtle volumetric MRI changes in MCI and early stages of AD. Using stereological methods, the total cell numbers in cytoarchitectural well-defined regions can be accurately estimated without bias resulting from histological distortions. These studies show that Nissl-stained perikarya contribute to less than 10% of the total brain volume, whereas the sum of all nerve cell processes that are not stained by Nissl stains (the so-called neuropil) compose at least 85% of the human gray matter (Blinkov and Glezer, 1968). These findings are critical to interpret the cellular basis of regional atrophy measured using MRI. In order to validate structural imaging findings, several groups have correlated in vivo imaging results with post-mortem cytoarchitectonic, histopathologic and biochemical findings. For instance, Zilles and colleagues pioneered an approach to create probabilistic maps of cytoarchitectural areas (i.e. Brodmann areas) in MRI space based on MRI scans of formalin-fixed human brains that were also analyzed histologically (Eickhoff et al., 2005; Toga et al., 2006). Using related methods, other groups have defined the neuropathological substrate of Alzheimer’s disease (Bobinski et al., 2000; Bronge et al., 2002) or white matter hyperintensities (Braffman et al., 1988; Mazziotta et al., 2001). Although it is indisputable that these approaches are helpful for the interpretation of MRI findings, the fixation process makes it difficult to determine the morphological substrate of subtle and less specific volume changes as seen in MCI (Challa et al., 2002; Kretschmann et al., 1982; Uylings et al., 1986). As the MR signal depends on tissue water content and temperature, brain fixation is associated with a shift of fluids. This can lead to a potential misinterpretation of post-mortem MRI results.(Grinberg et al., 2008). In addition, unpredictable swelling and shrinkage during fixation is known to distort the tissue, making it difficult to correlate histology with in vivo maps without nonlinear image matching algorithms (Mega et al., 1997) (Figure 3). In fact, a primary goal of post-mortem MRI studies is to test the validity of these algorithms. Therefore, other approaches are required to validate in vivo MRI findings based on post-mortem data.

The use of ante-mortem MRI could be the gold standard, if the interval between MRI and autopsy was short enough to allow for direct comparisons. A recent study found significant correlations between cortical gray matter and hippocampal volume, as well as subcortical white matter lesions determined using ante-mortem MRI followed by histologically determined semi-quantitative ratings of overall plaque and tangle burden, hippocampal sclerosis and cerebrovascular abnormalities(Jagust et al., 2008). However, even in the most recent study the interval between MRI and autopsy was on average 3.3 years in the AD group (Jagust et al., 2008).

An alternative approach may be scanning of post-mortem brains in situ. This approach avoids tissue deformations and signal changes induced by post-mortem brain fixation. The postmortem MRI scan in situ serves as a proxy of the in vivo space and can be used as reference to match histological findings to the in vivo space based on intra-individual data. This approach has been applied to 18 human brains scanned post-mortem in situ prior to histological processing (Grinberg et al., 2008c). In situ post-mortem MRI included MRI, DTI and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) acquisitions as respective measures of regional volume, neuronal fiber tract integrity and macromolecular structural integrity of brain tissue (Figure 4). Stereological, histochemical and immunohistochemical assessments of serial histological sections are compared with the MRI data (Figures 4 and and5)5) using a point-to-point tridimensional platform. This latter approach is a promising tool to validate in vivo imaging findings, and ongoing research should better verify this potential.

Research Highlights

  • Neuroimaging allow for 4D in vivo brain maps to stage pathological changes in Alzheimer’s disease
  • Parallels in progressive grey matter atrophy, hypometabolism and amyloid deposition
  • DTI shows retrogenesis of fiber connections in medial temporal brain network of memory
  • Progression is modulated by genetic risk factors and life style factors
  • Staging model useful to monitor disease progression, evaluate drug-efficacy and diagnose AD

Acknowledgments

Funding was obtained by H.H. through the Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) investigator neuroimaging program award 08/IN.1/B1846. H.H. was further supported by the “Landesoffensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-ökonomischer Exzellenz” (LOEWE) neuroimaging-neurophysiology research program grant “Neuronale Koordination Forschungsschwerpunkt Frankfurt” (NeFF), Neuronal Coordination, Neurodegeneration & Alzheimer’s disease project. P.T. was supported by NIH grants EB008281, AG020098, AG016570, HD050735, and EB007813. S.J.T. was supported by a research grant of the Hirnliga Foundation, Germany, and a grant from th Interdisciplinary Faculty, Department Aging Science and Humanities, University Rostock, Rostock, Germany. E.A.J., L.T.G. and H.H. were supported by CAPES/DAAD PROBRAL grant n. 289/08. L.T.G. was supported by a scholarship from the Humboldt Foundation.

List of abbreviations

amyloid-beta
AD
Alzheimer’s disease
ADNI
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
ApoE4
Apolipoprotein ε4
BDNF
brain derived neurotrophic factor
CSF
cerebrospinal fluid
DTI
diffusion tensor imaging
FA
fractional anisotropy
FDG-PET
fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography
MCI
mild cognitive impairment
MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
MTR
Magnetic transfer ratio
NbM
basal nucleus of Meynert
[11C]PIB
Pittsburgh Compound B

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • Apostolova LG, Akopyan GG, Partiali N, Steiner CA, Dutton RA, Hayashi KM, Dinov ID, Toga AW, Cummings JL, Thompson PM. Structural correlates of apathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;24:91–97. [PubMed]
  • Apostolova LG, Lu P, Rogers S, Dutton RA, Hayashi KM, Toga AW, Cummings JL, Thompson PM. 3D mapping of language networks in clinical and pre-clinical Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and language. 2008;104:33–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Apostolova LG, Lu PH, Rogers S, Dutton RA, Hayashi KM, Toga AW, Cummings JL, Thompson PM. 3D mapping of mini-mental state examination performance in clinical and preclinical Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20:224–231. [PubMed]
  • Apostolova LG, Thompson PM, Green AE, Hwang KS, Zoumalan C, Jack CR, Jr, Harvey DJ, Petersen RC, Thal LJ, Aisen PS, Toga AW, Cummings JL, Decarli CS. 3D comparison of low, intermediate, and advanced hippocampal atrophy in MCI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010a;31:786–797. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Apostolova LG, Thompson PM, Rogers SA, Dinov ID, Zoumalan C, Steiner CA, Siu E, Green AE, Small GW, Toga AW, Cummings JL, Phelps ME, Silverman DH. Surface feature-guided mapping of cerebral metabolic changes in cognitively normal and mildly impaired elderly. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010b;12:218–224. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Arendt T, Bruckner MK, Gertz HJ, Marcova L. Cortical distribution of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease matches the pattern of neurons that retain their capacity of plastic remodelling in the adult brain. Neurosci. 1998;83:991–1002. [PubMed]
  • Ashburner J, Csernansky JG, Davatzikos C, Fox NC, Frisoni GB, Thompson PM. Computer-assisted imaging to assess brain structure in healthy and diseased brains. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:79–88. [PubMed]
  • Avants BB, Cook PA, Ungar L, Gee JC, Grossman M. Dementia induces correlated reductions in white matter integrity and cortical thickness: A multivariate neuroimaging study with sparse canonical correlation analysis. NEUROLMAGE. 2010;50:1004–1016. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bakkour A, Morris JC, Dickerson BC. The cortical signature of prodromal AD. Regional thinning predicts mild AD dementia. Neurology 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baron JC, Chetelat G, Desgranges B, Perchey G, Landeau B, de la Sayette V, Eustache F. In vivo mapping of gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2001;14:298–309. [PubMed]
  • Barrick TR, Charlton RA, Clark CA, Markus HS. White matter structural decline in normal ageing: a prospective longitudinal study using tract-based spatial statistics. Neuroimage. 2010;51:565–577. [PubMed]
  • Bartzokis G. Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:5–18. author reply 49–62. [PubMed]
  • Bartzokis G, Sultzer D, Lu PH, Nuechterlein KH, Mintz J, Cummings JL. Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: implications for cortical “disconnection” in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:843–851. [PubMed]
  • Bokde AL, Ewers M, Hampel H. Assessing neuronal networks: understanding Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2009;89:125–133. [PubMed]
  • Bourgeat P, Chetelat G, Villemagne VL, Fripp J, Raniga P, Pike K, Acosta O, Szoeke C, Ourselin S, Ames D, Ellis KA, Martins RN, Masters CL, Rowe CC, Salvado O. Beta-amyloid burden in the temporal neocortex is related to hippocampal atrophy in elderly subjects without dementia. Neurology. 2010;74:121–127. [PubMed]
  • Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathologica. 1991;82:239–259. [PubMed]
  • Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer’s disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol Aging. 1995;16:271–278. discussion 278–284. [PubMed]
  • Braffman B, Zimmerman RA, Trojanowski JQ, Gonatas NK, Hickey WF, Schlaepfer WW. Brain MR: pathologic correlation with gross and histopathology. 2. Hyperintense white matter foci in the elderly. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 1988;9:629–636. [PubMed]
  • Braskie MN, Klunder AD, Hayashi KM, Protas H, Kepe V, Miller KJ, Huang SC, Barrio JR, Ercoli L, Toga AW, Bookheimer SY, Small GW, Thompson PM. Dynamic trajectory of cortical plaque and tangle load correlates with cognitive impairment in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Cerebral Cortex. 2008 submitted.
  • Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adali T. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. Neuroimage. 2009;45:S163–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Caroli A, Frisoni GB. The dynamics of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31:1263–1274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Celone KA, Calhoun VD, Dickerson BC, Atri A, Chua EF, Miller SL, DePeau K, Rentz DM, Selkoe DJ, Blacker D, Albert MS, Sperling RA. Alterations in memory networks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: an independent component analysis. J Neurosci. 2006;26:10222–10231. [PubMed]
  • Chetelat G, Desgranges B, De La Sayette V, Viader F, Eustache F, Baron JC. Mapping gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild cognitive impairment. Neuroreport. 2002;13:1939–1943. [PubMed]
  • Chetelat G, Landeau B, Eustache F, Mezenge F, Viader F, de la Sayette V, Desgranges B, Baron JC. Using voxel-based morphometry to map the structural changes associated with rapid conversion in MCI: a longitudinal MRI study. Neuroimage. 2005;27:934–946. [PubMed]
  • Chételat G, Villemagne VL, Bourgeat P, Pike KE, Jones G, Ames D, Ellis KA, Szoeke C, Martins RN, O’Keefe GJ, Salvado O, Masters CL, Rowe CC. Australian Imaging, B. and Lifestyle Research, G. . Relationship between atrophy and beta-amyloid deposition in Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:317–324. [PubMed]
  • Chiang MC, Avedissian C, Barysheva M, Toga AW, McMahon KL, de Zubicaray GI, Wright MJ, Thompson PM. Extending genetic linkage analysis to diffusion tensor images to map single gene effects on brain fiber architecture. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2009;12:506–513. [PubMed]
  • Chiang MC, McMahon KL, de Zubicaray GI, Martin NG, Hickie I, Toga AW, Wright MJ, Thompson PM. Genetics of white matter development: A DTI study of 705 twins and their siblings aged 12 to 29. Neuroimage 2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chua TC, Wen W, Chen X, Kochan N, Slavin MJ, Trollor JN, Brodaty H, Sachdev PS. Diffusion tensor imaging of the posterior cingulate is a useful biomarker of mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17:602–613. [PubMed]
  • Cohen AD, Price JC, Weissfeld LA, James J, Rosario BL, Bi W, Nebes RD, Saxton JA, Snitz BE, Aizenstein HA, Wolk DA, Dekosky ST, Mathis CA, Klunk WE. Basal cerebral metabolism may modulate the cognitive effects of Aβ in mild cognitive impairment: an example of brain reserve. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14770–14778. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Coleman M. Axon degeneration mechanisms: commonality amid diversity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:889–898. [PubMed]
  • Deary IJ, Bastin ME, Pattie A, Clayden JD, Whalley LJ, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM. White matter integrity and cognition in childhood and old age. Neurology. 2006;66:505–512. [PubMed]
  • Di Paola M, Di Iulio F, Cherubini A, Blundo C, Casini AR, Sancesario G, Passafiume D, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G. When, where, and how the corpus callosum changes in MCI and AD: a multimodal MRI study. Neurology. 2010;74:1136–1142. [PubMed]
  • Dickerson BC, Sperling RA. Functional abnormalities of the medial temporal lobe memory system in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: insights from functional MRI studies. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:1624–1635. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Duyckaerts C, Dickson DW. Neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Dickson DW, editor. Neurodegeneration: the molecular pathology of dementia and movement disorders. ISN Neuropath Press; Basel: 2003. pp. 47–65.
  • Engler H, Forsberg A, Almkvist O, Blomquist G, Larsson E, Savitcheva I, Wall A, Ringheim A, Langstrom B, Nordberg A. Two-year follow-up of amyloid deposition in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2006;129:2856–2866. [PubMed]
  • Fan Y, Resnick SM, Wu X, Davatzikos C. Structural and functional biomarkers of prodromal Alzheimer’s disease: A high-dimensional pattern classification study. Neuroimage. 2008;41:277–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Filippini N, MacIntosh BJ, Hough MG, Goodwin GM, Frisoni GB, Smith SM, Matthews PM, Beckmann CF, Mackay CE. Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7209–7214. [PubMed]
  • Foland-Ross LC, Altshuler LL, Bookheimer SY, Lieberman MD, Townsend J, Penfold C, Moody T, Ahlf K, Shen JK, Madsen SK, Rasser PE, Toga AW, Thompson PM. Amygdala Reactivity in Healthy Adults Is Correlated with Prefrontal Cortical Thickness. J Neurosci. 2010;30:16673–16678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. [PubMed]
  • Friese U, Meindl T, Herpertz SC, Reiser MF, Hampel H, Teipel SJ. Diagnostic utility of novel MRI-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: diffusion tensor imaging and deformation-based morphometry. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20:477–490. [PubMed]
  • Frisoni GB. Visual rating and volumetry of the medial temporal lobe on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:572. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Frisoni GB, Henneman WJ, Weiner MW, Scheltens P, Vellas B, Reynish E, Hudecova J, Hampel H, Burger K, Blennow K, Waldemar G, Johannsen P, Wahlund LO, Zito G, Rossini PM, Winblad B, Barkhof F. The pilot European Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative of the European Alzheimer’s Disease Consortium. Alzheimers Dement. 2008;4:255–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Frisoni GB, Pievani M, Testa C, Sabattoli F, Bresciani L, Bonetti M, Beltramello A, Hayashi KM, Toga AW, Thompson PM. The topography of grey matter involvement in early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2007;130:720–730. [PubMed]
  • Frisoni GB, Testa C, Sabattoli F, Beltramello A, Soininen H, Laakso MP. Structural correlates of early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease: voxel based morphometric study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:112–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, Nugent TF, 3rd, Herman DH, Clasen LS, Toga AW, Rapoport JL, Thompson PM. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8174–8179. [PubMed]
  • Gogtay N, Thompson PM. Brain and Cognition Special Issue. Adolescent Brain Development; 2009. Mapping gray matter maturation. submitted.
  • Grady CL, Haxby JV, Horwitz B, Berg G, Rapoport SI. Neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic function in early vs late onset dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25:807–816. [PubMed]
  • Grinberg LT, Amaro E, Jr, Teipel S, dos Santos DD, Pasqualucci CA, Leite RE, Camargo CR, Goncalves JA, Sanches AG, Santana M, Ferretti RE, Jacob-Filho W, Nitrini R, Heinsen H. Assessment of factors that confound MRI and neuropathological correlation of human postmortem brain tissue. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008;9:195–203. [PubMed]
  • Grinberg LT, Rub U, Ferretti RE, Nitrini R, Farfel JM, Polichiso L, Gierga K, Jacob-Filho W, Heinsen H. The dorsal raphe nucleus shows phospho-tau neurofibrillary changes before the transentorhinal region in Alzheimer’s disease. A precocious onset? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009;35:406–416. [PubMed]
  • Grothe M, Zaborszky L, Atienza M, Gil-Neciga E, Rodriguez-Romero R, Teipel SJ, Amunts K, Suarez-Gonzalez A, Cantero JL. Reduction of basal forebrain cholinergic system parallels cognitive impairment in patients at high risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:1685–1695. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hampel H, Frank R, Broich K, Teipel SJ, Katz RG, Hardy J, Herholz K, Bokde AL, Jessen F, Hoessler YC, Sanhai WR, Zetterberg H, Woodcock J, Blennow K. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010a;9:560–574. [PubMed]
  • Hampel H, Wilcock G, Andrieu S, Aisen P, Blennow K, Broich K, Carrillo M, Fox NC, Frisoni GB, Isaac M, Lovestone S, Nordberg A, Prvulovic D, Sampaio C, Scheltens P, Weiner M, Winblad B, Coley N, Vellas B. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease therapeutic trials. Prog Neurobiol 2010b [PubMed]
  • Hinrichs C, Singh V, Xu G, Johnson SC. Predictive markers for AD in a multi-modality framework: an analysis of MCI progression in the ADNI population. Neuroimage. 2011;55:574–589. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ho AJ, Raji CA, Becker JT, Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Hua X, Dinov ID, Stein JL, Rosano C, Toga AW, Thompson PM. The effects of physical activity, education, and body mass index on the aging brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2010a [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ho AJ, Raji CA, Becker JT, Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Hua X, Lee S, Hibar D, Dinov ID, Stein JL, Jack CR, Jr, Weiner MW, Toga AW, Thompson PM. Obesity is linked with lower brain volume in 700 AD and MCI patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2010b;31:1326–1339. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ho AJ, Stein JL, Hua X, Lee S, Hibar DP, Leow AD, Dinov ID, Toga AW, Saykin AJ, Shen L, Foroud T, Pankratz N, Huentelman MJ, Craig DW, Gerber JD, Allen AN, Corneveaux JJ, Stephan DA, DeCarli CS, DeChairo BM, Potkin SG, Jack CR, Jr, Weiner MW, Raji CA, Lopez OL, Becker JT, Carmichael OT, Thompson PM. A commonly carried allele of the obesity-related FTO gene is associated with reduced brain volume in the healthy elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010c;107:8404–8409. [PubMed]
  • Jack CR, Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, Petersen RC, Trojanowski JQ. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:119–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jack CR, Jr, Lowe VJ, Senjem ML, Weigand SD, Kemp BJ, Shiung MM, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, Petersen RC. 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer’s disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Brain. 2008;131:665–680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jacobs D, Sano M, Marder K, Bell K, Bylsma F, Lafleche G, Albert M, Brandt J, Stern Y. Age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease: relation to pattern of cognitive dysfunction and rate of decline. Neurology. 1994;44:1215–1220. [PubMed]
  • Karas GB, Scheltens P, Rombouts SA, Visser PJ, van Schijndel RA, Fox NC, Barkhof F. Global and local gray matter loss in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2004;23:708–716. [PubMed]
  • Kemppainen NM, Aalto S, Karrasch M, Nagren K, Savisto N, Oikonen V, Viitanen M, Parkkola R, Rinne JO. Cognitive reserve hypothesis: Pittsburgh Compound B and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in relation to education in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2008;63:112–118. [PubMed]
  • Kidron D, Black SE, Stanchev P, Buck B, Szalai JP, Parker J, Szekely C, Bronskill MJ. Quantitative MR volumetry in Alzheimer’s disease. Topographic markers and the effects of sex and education. Neurology. 1997;49:1504–1512. [PubMed]
  • Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, Holt DP, Bergstrom M, Savitcheva I, Huang GF, Estrada S, Ausen B, Debnath ML, Barletta J, Price JC, Sandell J, Lopresti BJ, Wall A, Koivisto P, Antoni G, Mathis CA, Langstrom B. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306–319. [PubMed]
  • Koch W, Teipel S, Mueller S, Benninghoff J, Wagner M, Bokde AL, Hampel H, Coates U, Reiser M, Meindl T. Diagnostic power of default mode network resting state fMRI in the detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of aging. 2010 in press. [PubMed]
  • Kochunov P, Glahn DC, Lancaster JL, Winkler AM, Smith S, Thompson PM, Almasy L, Duggirala R, Fox PT, Blangero J. Genetics of microstructure of cerebral white matter using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage. 2010;53:1109–1116. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lambert JC, Mann D, Richard F, Tian J, Shi J, Thaker U, Merrot S, Harris J, Frigard B, Iwatsubo T, Lendon C, Amouyel P. Is there a relation between APOE expression and brain amyloid load in Alzheimer’s disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:928–933. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lerch JP, Pruessner JC, Zijdenbos A, Hampel H, Teipel SJ, Evans AC. Focal decline of cortical thickness in Alzheimer’s disease identified by computational neuroanatomy. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:995–1001. [PubMed]
  • Lu L, Leonard C, Thompson P, Kan E, Jolley J, Welcome S, Toga A, Sowell E. Normal developmental changes in inferior frontal gray matter are associated with improvement in phonological processing: a longitudinal MRI analysis. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:1092–1099. [PubMed]
  • Lu LH, Dapretto M, O’Hare ED, Kan E, McCourt ST, Thompson PM, Toga AW, Bookheimer SY, Sowell ER. Relationships between brain activation and brain structure in normally developing children. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2595–2604. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J, Zilles K, Woods R, Paus T, Simpson G, Pike B, Holmes C, Collins L, Thompson P, MacDonald D, Iacoboni M, Schormann T, Amunts K, Palomero-Gallagher N, Geyer S, Parsons L, Narr K, Kabani N, Le Goualher G, Boomsma D, Cannon T, Kawashima R, Mazoyer B. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356:1293–1322. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mesulam M. The cholinergic lesion of Alzheimer’s disease: pivotal factor or side show? Learn Mem. 2004;11:43–49. [PubMed]
  • Mintun MA, Larossa GN, Sheline YI, Dence CS, Lee SY, Mach RH, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, DeKosky ST, Morris JC. [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006;67:446–452. [PubMed]
  • Mormino EC, Kluth JT, Madison CM, Rabinovici GD, Baker SL, Miller BL, Koeppe RA, Mathis CA, Weiner MW, Jagust WJ. Episodic memory loss is related to hippocampal-mediated beta-amyloid deposition in elderly subjects. Brain. 2009;132:1310–1323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mosconi L, Pupi A, De Cristofaro MT, Fayyaz M, Sorbi S, Herholz K. Functional interactions of the entorhinal cortex: an 18F-FDG PET study on normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:382–392. [PubMed]
  • Mueller SG, Weiner MW, Thal LJ, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Jagust W, Trojanowski JQ, Toga AW, Beckett L. Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Alzheimers Dement. 2005;1:55–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Perneczky R, Drzezga A, Diehl-Schmid J, Schmid G, Wohlschlager A, Kars S, Grimmer T, Wagenpfeil S, Monsch A, Kurz A. Schooling mediates brain reserve in Alzheimer’s disease: findings of fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:1060–1063. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pievani M, Agosta F, Pagani E, Canu E, Sala S, Absinta M, Geroldi C, Ganzola R, Frisoni GB, Filippi M. Assessment of white matter tract damage in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31:1862–1875. [PubMed]
  • Protas HD, Huang SC, Kepe V, Hayashi K, Klunder A, Braskie MN, Ercoli L, Bookheimer S, Thompson PM, Small GW, Barrio JR. FDDNP binding using MR derived cortical surface maps. Neuroimage. 2010;49:240–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Reiman EM, Caselli RJ, Yun LS, Chen K, Bandy D, Minoshima S, Thibodeau SN, Osborne D. Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer’s disease in persons homozygous for the epsilon 4 allele for apolipoprotein E. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:752–758. [PubMed]
  • Reiman EM, Chen K, Alexander GE, Caselli RJ, Bandy D, Osborne D, Saunders AM, Hardy J. Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:284–289. [PubMed]
  • Reiman EM, Chen K, Liu X, Bandy D, Yu M, Lee W, Ayutyanont N, Keppler J, Reeder SA, Langbaum JB, Alexander GE, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, Price JC, Aizenstein HJ, DeKosky ST, Caselli RJ. Fibrillar amyloid-beta burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:6820–6825. [PubMed]
  • Reisberg B, Franssen EH, Hasan SM, Monteiro I, Boksay I, Souren LE, Kenowsky S, Auer SR, Elahi S, Kluger A. Retrogenesis: clinical, physiologic, and pathologic mechanisms in brain aging, Alzheimer’s and other dementing processes. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1999a;249(Suppl 3):28–36. [PubMed]
  • Reisberg B, Franssen EH, Souren LE, Auer SR, Akram I, Kenowsky S. Evidence and mechanisms of retrogenesis in Alzheimer’s and other dementias: management and treatment import. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2002;17:202–212. [PubMed]
  • Reisberg B, Kenowsky S, Franssen EH, Auer SR, Souren LE. Towards a science of Alzheimer’s disease management: a model based upon current knowledge of retrogenesis. Int Psychogeriatr. 1999b;11:7–23. [PubMed]
  • Rowe CC, Ng S, Ackermann U, Gong SJ, Pike K, Savage G, Cowie TF, Dickinson KL, Maruff P, Darby D, Smith C, Woodward M, Merory J, Tochon-Danguy H, O’Keefe G, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, Price JC, Masters CL, Villemagne VL. Imaging beta-amyloid burden in aging and dementia. Neurology. 2007;68:1718–1725. [PubMed]
  • Sassin I, Schultz C, Thal DR, Rub U, Arai K, Braak E, Braak H. Evolution of Alzheimer’s disease-related cytoskeletal changes in the basal nucleus of Meynert. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2000;100:259–269. [PubMed]
  • Scarmeas N, Habeck CG, Hilton J, Anderson KE, Flynn J, Park A, Stern Y. APOE related alterations in cerebral activation even at college age. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1440–1444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Scarmeas N, Habeck CG, Stern Y, Anderson KE. APOE genotype and cerebral blood flow in healthy young individuals. Jama. 2003;290:1581–1582. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Seltzer B, Sherwin I. A comparison of clinical features in early- and late-onset primary degenerative dementia. One entity or two? Arch Neurol. 1983;40:143–146. [PubMed]
  • Sexton CE, Kalu UG, Filippini N, Mackay CE, Ebmeier KP. A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2010 p. Epub. [PubMed]
  • Shaw P, Lerch JP, Pruessner JC, Taylor KN, Rose AB, Greenstein D, Clasen L, Evans A, Rapoport JL, Giedd JN. Cortical morphology in children and adolescents with different apolipoprotein E gene polymorphisms: an observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:494–500. [PubMed]
  • Silverman DHS, Thompson PM. Structural and functional neuroimaging: focussing on mild cognitive impairment. Applied Neurology. 2006;2:10–22.
  • Small GW, Kepe V, Ercoli LM, Siddarth P, Bookheimer SY, Miller KJ, Lavretsky H, Burggren AC, Cole GM, Vinters HV, Thompson PM, Huang SC, Satyamurthy N, Phelps ME, Barrio JR. PET of brain amyloid and tau in mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2652–2663. [PubMed]
  • Small GW, Protas HD, Huang SC, Kepe V, Siddarth P, Hayashi KM. FDDNP binding values from cortical hemispheric surface maps correlate with MMSE scores. Alzheimer’s Association International Conference on the Prevention of Dementia; Washington, DC. 2007.
  • Smith AD. Imaging the progression of Alzheimer pathology through the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:4135–4137. [PubMed]
  • Sowell ER, Peterson BS, Thompson PM, Welcome SE, Henkenius AL, Toga AW. Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:309–315. [PubMed]
  • Stern Y. Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47:2015–2028. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stern Y, Jacobs DM. Preliminary findings from the predictors study: utility of clinical signs for predicting disease course. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1995;9(Suppl 1):S14–18. [PubMed]
  • Stricker NH, Schweinsburg BC, Delano-Wood L, Wierenga CE, Bangen KJ, Haaland KY, Frank LR, Salmon DP, Bondi MW. Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer’s disease supports retrogenesis. Neuroimage. 2009;45:10–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Svedberg MM, Hall H, Hellstrom-Lindahl E, Estrada S, Guan Z, Nordberg A, Langstrom B. [(11)C]PIB-amyloid binding and levels of Abeta40 and Abeta42 in postmortem brain tissue from Alzheimer patients. Neurochemistry international 2008 [PubMed]
  • Takahashi S, Yonezawa H, Takahashi J, Kudo M, Inoue T, Tohgi H. Selective reduction of diffusion anisotropy in white matter of Alzheimer disease brains measured by 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett. 2002;332:45–48. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Bokde AL, Born C, Meindl T, Reiser M, Moller HJ, Hampel H. Morphological substrate of face matching in healthy ageing and mild cognitive impairment: a combined MRI-fMRI study. Brain. 2007a;130:1745–1758. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Bokde AL, Meindl T, Amaro E, Jr, Soldner J, Reiser MF, Herpertz SC, Moller HJ, Hampel H. White matter microstructure underlying default mode network connectivity in the human brain. NeuroImage. 2010a;49:2021–2032. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Born C, Ewers M, Bokde AL, Reiser MF, Moller HJ, Hampel H. Multivariate deformation-based analysis of brain atrophy to predict Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage. 2007b;38:13–24. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Flatz WH, Heinsen H, Bokde AL, Schoenberg SO, Stockel S, Dietrich O, Reiser MF, Moller HJ, Hampel H. Measurement of basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease using MRI. Brain. 2005;128:2626–2644. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Meindl T, Grinberg L, Grothe M, Cantero JL, Reiser MF, Moller HJ, Heinsen H, Hampel H. The cholinergic system in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: An in vivo MRI and DTI study. Human brain mapping. 2010b in press. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Meindl T, Wagner M, Kohl T, Burger K, Reiser MF, Herpertz S, Moller HJ, Hampel H. White matter microstructure in relation to education in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;17:571–583. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Meindl T, Wagner M, Stieltjes B, Reuter S, Hauenstein KH, Filippi M, Ernemann U, Reiser MF, Hampel H. Longitudinal changes in fiber tract integrity in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: a DTI follow-up study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010c;22:507–522. [PubMed]
  • Teipel SJ, Stahl R, Dietrich O, Schoenberg SO, Perneczky R, Bokde AL, Reiser MF, Moller HJ, Hampel H. Multivariate network analysis of fiber tract integrity in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage. 2007c;34:985–995. [PubMed]
  • Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, de Zubicaray G, Janke AL, Rose SE, Semple J, Herman D, Hong MS, Dittmer SS, Doddrell DM, Toga AW. Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2003;23:994–1005. [PubMed]
  • Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, Dutton RA, Chiang MC, Leow AD, Sowell ER, De Zubicaray G, Becker JT, Lopez OL, Aizenstein HJ, Toga AW. Tracking Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1097:183–214. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thompson PM, Vidal C, Giedd JN, Gochman P, Blumenthal J, Nicolson R, Toga AW, Rapoport JL. Mapping adolescent brain change reveals dynamic wave of accelerated gray matter loss in very early-onset schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11650–11655. [PubMed]
  • Tiraboschi P, Hansen LA, Masliah E, Alford M, Thal LJ, Corey-Bloom J. Impact of APOE genotype on neuropathologic and neurochemical markers of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2004;62:1977–1983. [PubMed]
  • Vemuri P, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, Aisen PS, Weiner M, Petersen RC, Jack CR., Jr Effect of apolipoprotein E on biomarkers of amyloid load and neuronal pathology in Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:308–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Von Economo CV. The Cytoarchitectonics of the Human Cerebral Cortex. Oxford Medical Publications; London: 1929.
  • Whitwell JL, Przybelski SA, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Petersen RC, Jack CR., Jr 3D maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2007;130:1777–1786. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Whitwell JL, Shiung MM, Przybelski SA, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Petersen RC, Jack CR., Jr MRI patterns of atrophy associated with progression to AD in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2008;70:512–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wolk DA, Dickerson BC, Weiner M, Aiello M, Aisen P, Albert MS, Alexander G, Anderson HS, Anderson K, Apostolova L, Arnold S, Ashford W, Assaly M, Asthana S, Bandy D, Bartha R, Bates V, Beckett L, Bell KL, Benincasa AL, Bergman H, Bernick C, Bernstein M, Black S, Blank K, Borrie M, Brand C, Brewer J, Brown AD, Burns JM, Cairns NJ, Caldwell C, Capote H, Carlsson CM, Carmichael O, Cellar JS, Celmins D, Chen K, Chertkow H, Chowdhury M, Clark D, Connor D, Correia S, Crawford K, Dale A, de Leon MJ, De Santi SM, Decarli C, Detoledo-Morrell L, Devous M, Diaz-Arrastia R, Dolen S, Donohue M, Doody RS, Doraiswamy PM, Duara R, Englert J, Farlow M, Feldman H, Felmlee J, Fleisher A, Fletcher E, Foroud TM, Foster N, Fox N, Frank R, Gamst A, Given CA, 2nd, Graff-Radford NR, Green RC, Griffith R, Grossman H, Hake AM, Hardy P, Harvey D, Heidebrink JL, Hendin BA, Herring S, Honig LS, Hosein C, Robin Hsiung GY, Hudson L, Ismail MS, Jack CR, Jr, Jacobson S, Jagust W, Jayam-Trouth A, Johnson K, Johnson H, Johnson N, Johnson KA, Johnson S, Kachaturian Z, Karlawish JH, Kataki M, Kaye J, Kertesz A, Killiany R, Kittur S, Koeppe RA, Korecka M, Kornak J, Kozauer N, Lah JJ, Laubinger MM, Lee VM, Lee TY, Lerner A, Levey AI, Longmire CF, Lopez OL, Lord JL, Lu PH, Macavoy MG, Malloy P, Marson D, Martin-Cook K, Martinez W, Marzloff G, Mathis C, Mc-Adams-Ortiz C, Mesulam M, Miller BL, Mintun MA, Mintzer J, Molchan S, Montine T, Morris J, Mulnard RA, Munic D, Nair A, Neu S, Nguyen D, Norbash A, Oakley M, Obisesan TO, Ogrocki P, Ott BR, Parfitt F, Pawluczyk S, Pearlson G, Petersen R, Petrella JR, Potkin S, Potter WZ, Preda A, Quinn J, Rainka M, Reeder S, Reiman EM, Rentz DM, Reynolds B, Richard J, Roberts P, Rogers J, Rosen A, Rosen HJ, Rusinek H, Sabbagh M, Sadowsky C, Salloway S, Santulli RB, Saykin AJ, Scharre DW, Schneider L, Schneider S, Schuff N, Shah RC, Shaw L, Shen L, Silverman DH, Simpson DM, Sink KM, Smith CD, Snyder PJ, Spann BM, Sperling RA, Spicer K, Stefanovic B, Stern Y, Stopa E, Tang C, Tariot P, Taylor-Reinwald L, Thai G, Thomas RG, Thompson P, Tinklenberg J, Toga AW, Tremont G, Trojanowki JQ, Trost D, Turner RS, van Dyck CH, Vanderswag H, Varon D, Villanueva-Meyer J, Villena T, Walter S, Wang P, Watkins F, Williamson JD, Wolk D, Wu CK, Zerrate M, Zimmerman EA. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype has dissociable effects on memory and attentional-executive network function in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:10256–10261. [PubMed]
  • Zaborszky L, Hoemke L, Mohlberg H, Schleicher A, Amunts K, Zilles K. Stereotaxic probabilistic maps of the magnocellular cell groups in human basal forebrain. NeuroImage. 2008;42:1127–1141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhang Y, Schuff N, Jahng GH, Bayne W, Mori S, Schad L, Mueller S, Du AT, Kramer JH, Yaffe K, Chui H, Jagust WJ, Miller BL, Weiner MW. Diffusion tensor imaging of cingulum fibers in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007;68:13–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhuang L, Wen W, Zhu W, Trollor J, Kochan N, Crawford J, Reppermund S, Brodaty H, Sachdev P. White matter integrity in mild cognitive impairment: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Neuroimage. 2010;53:16–25. [PubMed]