Complex protein interactions that lead to the sequestration of P-TEFb are facilitated by the structural nature of the RNA. To date, modest progress has been made on the structure of 7SK snRNA and how this influences protein interactions. Initially, nuclease sensitivity and chemical footprinting were used to probe the secondary structure of 7SK snRNA from 7SK snRNP, which was isolated from HeLa cells.
34 The ensuing Wassarman and Steitz model contained four RNA hairpins or stem loops (). There were some discrepancies between the actual data and the proposed structure. For example, residues U28, U30, U66, and U68 were depicted as being in paired regions, but the experimental results indicated that they were sensitive to chemical modification (). Moreover, the structure differed from that obtained by predictive RNA-folding programs.
35 Some of these differences can be reconciled by the conformational change of 7SK snRNA upon the release of HEXIM and P-TEFb.
36 Indeed, the presence of two 7SK snRNA conformers in the population of 7SK snRNPs could explain the original mapping data.
36 In support of this conformational change, the RNA secondary structure prediction program mFold
37 yields two families of highly related human 7SK snRNA structures with similar stabilities.
36 An extensive examination of 7SK snRNA sequences from other organisms supports this and other modifications to the original Wassarman and Steitz structure ().
38The known binding sites of the proteins in the 7SK snRNP give insights into how the structure of the RNA itself may lead to regulated release of P-TEFb. Though many details are unclear, several regions of the RNA have importance in protein binding. The sites of association of HEXIM dimers have now been mapped with reasonable accuracy to the main 5’ motif (M3) (). This determination was difficult because HEXIM1 also binds dsRNA in a sequence-independent manner.
39 Nevertheless, HEXIM1 can be cross-linked to U at position 30 in the lower half of M3 in 7SK snRNA
40. Further detailed analyses concluded that binding of HEXIM1 was directed by the upper half and strengthened by the lower half of M3.
41 Since HEXIM1 exists as an obligate dimer and binds 7SK snRNA as such,
30, 42, 43 it is likely that both sites are occupied simultaneously. NMR techniques demonstrated that two GAUC motifs (42–45 paired to 64–67) are the critical recognition sequence, which is opened and stabilized by short peptides derived from the arginine rich motif (ARM) in HEXIM.
44 Proline and serine residues in the middle of basic residues are also essential for this recognition.
Humans express two HEXIM paralogs, HEXIM1 and HEXIM2. Expressed ubiquitously from adjacent genes on the human chromosome 17, these 41 and 32 kDa proteins contain 359 and 286 residues, respectively (). In the central region of both HEXIM proteins are found conserved basic and acidic residues that are autoinhibitory in the absence of 7SK snRNA.
43, 45 Only upon the binding of their ARMs to 7SK snRNA is their conformation changed so that they can interact with and inhibit P-TEFb.
39 At their C-termini are two coiled coil regions that are used for dimerization and association with the cyclin boxes in CycT1 and CycT2.
31 The formation of HEXIM1 oligomers is a prerequisite for RNA-binding.
30 Fully assembled 7SK snRNP measures 550–600 kDa (). HEXIM1 is more abundant than HEXIM2 in HeLa cells, but mixed oligomers are thought to exist.
30 In addition, when HEXIM1 is knocked down, HEXIM2 replaces it on 7SK snRNA with no loss of function.
43, 45The interaction of P-TEFb, and therefore its regulation, is the fundamental reason for the existence of the 7SK snRNP. Though details of the interaction with the RNA are unresolved, it has been shown that CycT1 from P-TEFb may bind to M8 possibly through its Tat•TAR Recognition Motif (TRM) (). Whether P-TEFb directly binds to this region of 7SK snRNA or through another protein is unclear.
When P-TEFb and HEXIM dissociate from the 7SK snRNP, another set of factors enter the complex. They are the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particle (hnRNP) proteins, hnRNPA1, hnRNAPA2, hnRNPQ1 and hnRNPR (). They bind M1 and M7 (hnRNPQ1, hnRNPR), or M7 only (hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2)( and ). They were identified in proteomic screens by 7SK snRNA affinity chromatography.
46–48The 7SK RNA undergoes a conformational change when P-TEFb is released from the 7SK snRNP. Chemical (CMCT: N-Cyclohexyl-N-(β-[N-methylmorpholino]ethyl)carbodiimide p-toluenesulfonate) footprinting, which modifies unpaired uridines, revealed that the release of P-TEFb and HEXIM1 is accompanied by a change in the conformation in 7SK snRNA.
36 () Since 7SK snRNA binds HEXIM tightly in vitro, this conformational change could contribute to the loss of affinity between 7SK snRNA and HEXIM1 in cells, where about half of the 7SK snRNP lacks HEXIM1 even though HEXIM1 is present in about a 5-fold molar excess in HeLa cells.
24, 45 Of note, it is also difficult to equilibrate exogenously introduced HEXIM1 with endogenous HEXIM1 even under conditions that disrupt and reform the 7SK snRNP in transient transfection assays. In this scenario, hnRNPs could stabilize a HEXIM-excluded conformation of 7SK snRNA. ()
As described above, LARP7 interacts with the 3’ end and MePCE methylates and, therefore, likely interacts with the 5’ end of 7SK. It is interesting that all metazoan 7SK snRNAs contain a highly conserved motif (M1) that pairs the exact 5’ end with a region just upstream of the 3’ stem and loop (M8).
38 This pairing brings both termini of the RNA into close proximity (). This arrangement may help position MePCE for a functional interaction with the 5’ end of 7SK snRNA, because LARP7 is associated with the 3’ end and has a direct interaction with MePCE.
28Another interesting comparison that has been made is between HIV transactivation response (TAR) RNA hairpin and 7SK snRNA. HIV transcriptional transactivator Tat binds the 5’ U bulge in TAR, which is similar to two U bulges in M3 of 7SK snRNA.
44, 49 Moreover, the ARMs that bind RNA in Tat and HEXIM1 are almost identical.
50 Tat and HEXIM1 also bind cyclin boxes in CycT1. Thus, it is not surprising that in vitro Tat competes with HEXIM1 for P-TEFb in the 7SK snRNP.
51, 52 Tat also binds the top of M3 in 7SK snRNA,
41, 52 however, the impact of this interaction on HIV transcription and replication is not clear.