1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. 2010. [Accessed February 1, 2011]. http://www.cdc.gov/brfss.
3. Steeh C, Kirgis N, Cannon B, DeWitt J. J Official Stat. J Official Stat 2001;17(2):227–247.
4. Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Q 2005;69(1):87–98.
5. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2009. National Center for Health Statistics; 2010. [Accessed June 8, 2010]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. 6. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(10):1806–1810. [PubMed]
7. Kuusela V, Callegaro M, Vehovar V. The influence of mobile telephones on telephone surveys. Chapter 4. In: Lepkowski JM, Tucker C, Brick JM, de Leeuw ED, Japec L, Lavrakas PJ, et al., editors. Advances in telephone survey methodology. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2008. pp. 87–112.
8. Brick JM, Edwards WS, Lee S. Sampling telephone numbers and adults, interview length, and weighting in the California Health Interview Survey Cellular Telephone Pilot Study. Public Opinion Q 2007;71(5):793–813.
9. Link M, Battaglia M, Frankel M, Osborn L, Mokdad A. Reaching the US cellular telephone generation: comparison of cellular telephone survey results with an ongoing landline telephone survey. Public Opinion Q 2007;71(5):814–839.
10. Battaglia MP, Osborn L, Link ML, Frankel MR, Mokdad AH. Incorporating a multimode design into a random-digit-dialing survey. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section of the American Statistical Association (CD-ROM) Alexandria (VA): American Statistical Association; 2007.
11. De Leeuw ED. To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. J Official Stat 2005; 21(2):233–255.
12. Hu SS, Balluz L, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR. Improving public health surveillance using a dual frame survey of landline and cell phone numbers. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):703–711. [PubMed]
13. Keeter S, Kennedy C, Clark A, Tompson T, Mokrzycki M. What's missing from national landline RDD surveys? The impact of the growing cell-only population. Public Opinion Q 2007;71(5):772–792.
14. Tucker C, Brick JM, Meekins B. Household telephone service and usage patterns in the US in 2004: implications for telephone samples. Public Opinion Q 2007;71(5):3–22.
15. Brick JM, Dipko S, Presser S, Tucker C, Yuan Y. Nonresponse bias in a dual-frame sample of cell and landline numbers. Public Opinion Q 2006;70(5):780–793.
16. Mokdad AH, Link MW, Hu SS. Where are we losing respondents? Trends in survey eligibility and participation. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.May 17-20, 2007; Anaheim, California. 2007.
17. Lambries D, Oldendick R, Link MW, Williams L. Young people may not be in jail, but most are in cells: cross-time impact of changes in phone use on telephone survey representativeness. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research.May 17-20, 2007; Anaheim, California.
18. Hu SS, Balluz L, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR. The impact of cell phones on public health surveillance. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):799. [PubMed]
19. Andersen R, Kasper J, Frankel MR. Total survey error. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1979.
20. Kish L. Survey sampling. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1965.
21. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd edition New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1977.
22. Turner C, Ku L, Rogers S. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280(5365):867–873. [PubMed]
23. Dillman DA, Christian LM. Survey modes as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods 2005;17(1):30–52.
24. Rao SR, Link MW, Battaglia MP, Frankel MR, Giambo P, Mokdad AH. Assessing representativeness in RDD surveys: coverage and nonresponse in the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association [CD-ROM] Alexandria (VA): American Statistical Association; 2005.
25. Neyman J. On two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection. J R Stat Soc 1934;97:558–606.