Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of NAc medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the core subregion were conducted in brain slices from adult rats after extended access cocaine or saline self-administration (6 h/day for 10 days), as in our prior studies (
Conrad et al., 2008;
McCutcheon et al., 2011). All recordings were conducted in slices obtained >45 days after the last self-administration session. At these withdrawal times, rats that self-administered cocaine express significant incubation of cue-induced cocaine craving (
Lu et al., 2004;
Conrad et al., 2008) and will be referred to hereafter as “incubated rats”. The presence of CP-AMPARs was evaluated from the rectification index [RI: ratio of evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) recorded at −70mV and +40mV; see details in
Materials and Methods]. In the presence of NMDAR and GABA
AR antagonists, both CP- and CI-AMPARs contribute to EPSCs recorded at the −70mV holding potential (EPSC
−70mV), whereas only CI-AMPARs are responsible for EPSCs recorded at the +40mV holding potential (EPSC
+40mV) due to voltage-dependent block of CP-AMPARs by intracellular polyamines (
Kamboj et al., 1995;
Cull-Candy et al., 2006). Thus, an increase in RI indicates a higher synaptic content of CP-AMPARs.
Consistent with our previous studies (
Conrad et al., 2008;
McCutcheon et al., 2011), AMPAR RI was significantly higher in “incubated rats” than in saline controls (). Such an increased AMPAR RI was observed in all MSNs recorded from “incubated rats”, as we have found previously, suggesting that the accumulation of CP-AMPARs occurs globally, rather than in subpopulations of NAc MSNs. Bath application of the group I mGluR agonist 3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) (50μM, 10 min) normalized the abnormally high RI observed in “incubated rats” (). This was associated with two concurrent events: EPSC
+40mV facilitation and EPSC
−70mV attenuation (). In saline controls, DHPG did not alter EPSC
+40mV but it did attenuate EPSC
−70mV (); the latter effect was associated with a facilitation of the paired-pulse ratio (PPR: EPSC
2/EPSC
1) from 0.85 ± 0.06 to 1.03 ± 0.08 in all cells tested (+20.15%;
P<0.005, paired
t test; n=7). Bath application of the CB1R antagonist AM-251 completely prevented this inhibition (2μM; ), suggesting that the effect of DHPG in saline controls resembles the well-studied striatal mGluR long-term depression that requires postsynaptic endocannabinoid release, presynaptic CB1R activation and reduction of glutamate release (
Lovinger, 2008). In contrast, DHPG attenuation of EPSC
-70mV in MSNs from “incubated rats” was not associated with a change in the PPR (baseline: 0.86 ± 0.07; DHPG: 0.87 ± 0.08) and was not affected by AM-251 (). However, presynaptic CB1R signaling was intact in “incubated rats” as revealed by the marked attenuation of EPSC
−70mV amplitude following bath application of the CB1R agonist WIN-55,212–2 (WIN; 2 μM; ). In fact, the magnitude of synaptic inhibition elicited by WIN in “incubated rats” was significantly larger than that observed in saline controls. Together, these results indicate a different mechanism for DHPG-dependent synaptic depression in “incubated rats”, an effect likely associated with a disruption of the normal mGluR-endocannabinoid interaction observed in saline controls.
We hypothesized that DHPG-induced synaptic depression in “incubated rats” involves elimination of CP-AMPAR-mediated transmission, either through removal of CP-AMPARs from NAc synapses or attenuation of their function through other means. We tested this using the CP-AMPAR blocker 1-naphthylacetylsperimine (naspm; 100μM). When applied alone, naspm decreased EPSC
−70mV by 29.8 ± 3.1% (
P<0.005 vs. baseline, n=5), which is consistent with our previous study (
Conrad et al., 2008). However, once EPSC
−70mV was reduced by DHPG, subsequent application of naspm had no further effect (). Similarly, when naspm was present prior to DHPG application, DHPG was unable to produce further EPSC
−70mV depression () or further reduce the RI (). Additional analysis demonstrated that naspm also prevented the ability of DHPG to increase EPSC
+40mV (). Together, these results indicate that mGluR-induced attenuation of EPSC
−70mV in “incubated rats” is expressed postsynaptically via elimination of CP-AMPAR-mediated transmission, and that CP-AMPAR activation at NAc synapses is required for mGluR-dependent potentiation of EPSC
+40mV, which is mediated by CI-AMPARs.
We next investigated the relative contribution of the two group I mGluR subtypes, mGluR1 and mGluR5, in mediating the differential mechanisms by which DHPG attenuates EPSC−70mV in MSNs from saline controls versus cocaine-exposed rats. We found that bath application of the mGluR5 antagonist MTEP (25 μM), not the mGluR1 antagonist LY367385 (50 μM), blocked the effect of DHPG in saline controls (). In contrast, DHPG attenuation of EPSC−70mV in MSNs from “incubated rats” was blocked by LY367385, not MTEP (). Additional analysis demonstrated that LY367385 (not MTEP) also prevented the ability of DHPG to normalize the RI () and to increase EPSC+40mV () in MSN from cocaine-exposed rats. Together, these pharmacological results indicate a shift from mGluR5- to mGluR1-dependent regulation of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the NAc of “incubated rats”.
We next examined the postsynaptic signaling mechanism that mediates the effects of DHPG. We found that the DHPG-induced normalization of RI in MSNs from “incubated rats” was blocked when the protein kinase C inhibitor (PKC) PKI-[19–31] peptide (10μM) was included in the recording electrode whereas intracellular administration of the protein kinase A inhibitor PKI-[5–24] (20μM) had no effect (). These results are consistent with the canonical role for postsynaptic Ca
2+/PKC-dependent mechanisms in group I mGluR signaling (
Kano et al., 2008). Importantly, both of the concurrent events (i.e., EPSC
−70mV attenuation and EPSC
+40mV facilitation) associated with the RI-normalizing effect of DHPG in the “incubated rats” were blocked by postsynaptic inhibition of PKC (). This finding, along with the ability of naspm to block EPSC
+40mV facilitation by DHPG (), indicates a mechanistic link between DHPG-induced inhibition of CP-AMPAR function and facilitation of CI-AMPAR transmission.