Our targeted screen for histone demethylases regulating lifespan in C. elegans confirms a role for the histone demethylases RBR-2 and LSD-1 in the control of longevity, and identifies potential novel regulators of lifespan (T26A5.5 and UTX-1). In particular, our study reveals that the H3K27me3 demethylase, UTX-1, regulates lifespan in an insulin pathway dependent manner. Because histone demethylases and their functions are highly conserved in more complex animals, including mammals, their effect on lifespan in C. elegans may likely be extended to other species.
The reason UTX-1 was not identified earlier in previous large-scale RNAi screens (
Lee et al., 2003;
Hansen et al., 2005;
Chen et al., 2007;
Curran & Ruvkun 2007) is unclear. It is possible that the increase in lifespan upon
utx-1 knockdown was not large enough to be reproducibly detected in a large screen. One clear difference between this screen and its predecessors is that our screen was performed using fertile worms in the absence of the DNA synthesis inhibitor, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR). While longevity induced by
utx-1 knock-down is independent of the worm’s fertility and should not be affected by FUdR, this drug can increase the lifespan of wild type worms (
Aitlhadj & Sturzenbaum, 2010). Thus, FUdR treatment may have masked the effects on lifespan of
utx-1 RNAi in previous screens.
The H3K27me3 mark is associated with regions of facultative heterochromatin. By demethylating the H3K27me3 mark, UTX may relieve chromatin repression (
Agger et al., 2007). As shown in this study, knock-down of
utx-1 resulted in a corresponding increase in H3K27me3 levels. Coupled with our observation that
utx-1 knock-down extends lifespan, these results suggest that the rate of aging may be subject to the regulation of the H3K27me3 mark. Indeed, a loss of epigenetic control over transcriptional silencing has been observed during aging (
Wareham et al., 1987;
Gaubatz & Cutler 1990;
Kennedy et al., 1995;
Smeal et al., 1996;
Shen et al., 2008) and may be explained, at least in part, by the drop in H3K27me3 levels we observed in the late stages of the worm’s life. Thus, the RNAi-mediated reduction of UTX-1 may promote longevity through the continued maintenance of the repressive H3K27me3 mark, preventing spurious and/or detrimental gene transcription late in life. Our data do not exclude the possibility that
utx-1 deficiency at the beginning of adult life sets a different level of H3K27me3, which may have consequences on longevity later in life. Changes in H3K27 methylation status may also be an indirect consequence of UTX-1 depletion in worms. For example,
sir-2.1 depletion has been found to indirectly increase H3K27 methylation (
Wirth et al., 2009).
The specific genes that may be derepressed by loss of H3K27me3 during aging are not known yet. UTX is thought to control the expression of HOX genes in mammalian cells (
Agger et al., 2007;
Lan et al., 2007), and a recent genome-wide study identified 2000 genes that are occupied by UTX in mammalian cells, including the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene (
Wang et al., 2010). In fact, it is likely that histone demethylases, such as UTX-1, regulate the expression of many genes, making it difficult to identify precisely which ones are important for longevity. In worms, the requirement of the insulin-FoxO pathway for longevity induced by UTX-1 deficiency raises the intriguing possibility that UTX-1 directly influences the expression of regulators of the insulin-FoxO pathway. This is consistent with the observation that
utx-1 knock-down triggers FoxO nuclear translocation. Collectively, our results suggest that
utx-1 is genetically upstream of FoxO/
daf-16, perhaps directly regulating genes that affect the activity of the insulin signaling pathway. However, our study does not exclude the possibility that UTX-1 regulation and H3K27me3 levels are also affected by insulin-FoxO signaling.
In
Drosophila, the heterozygous mutation of E(Z), a member of the PRC2 and H3K27 trimethyltransferase complex, has been recently found to extend longevity (
Siebold et al., 2010). One explanation for the fact that attenuation of an H3K27me3 methyltransferase (E(Z)) in flies or of an H3K27me3 demethylase (UTX-1) in worms both extend lifespan is that UTX-1 and E(Z) may not function in the same tissue or cell in the organism to regulate lifespan. Moreover, UTX-1 may not work in opposition of every single E(Z) target gene. It is also possible that optimal levels of H3K27me3 are required for proper lifespan extension and that either excess or dearth of H3K27me3 are detrimental for optimal fitness and lifespan. While there is a striking degree of conservation in the histone methylation pathway across species, it is also possible that there exist species-specific differences in how epigenetic marks regulate lifespan.
H3K27 demethylation was recently found to be accompanied with H3K4 trimethylation in mammalian cells (
Issaeva et al., 2007) and in
C. elegans (
Fisher et al., 2010). The H3K4me3 methyltransferase trithorax complex, which contains the subunits ASH-2, WDR5, and the H3K4 specific trimethyltransferase MLL2, co-purifies with UTX in mammalian cells (
Issaeva et al., 2007). In
C. elegans, homologous proteins responsible for H3K4 trimethylation, ASH-2, WDR5/TAG-125, and the methyltransferase SET-2 was recently found to regulate lifespan in a germline dependent manner (
Greer et al., 2010) As we have shown in this study however, knock-down of
utx-1 did not require the presence of the germline to extend lifespan. Furthermore,
utx-1 knock-down extends lifespan in a manner that depends on the insulin-FoxO pathway, while the longevity induced by
set-2 knock-down was only partially dependent upon
daf-16/FoxO to regulate lifespan (
Greer et al., 2010). Collectively, our results suggest that the UTX-1 demethylase and the SET-2 trimethyltransferase complex impact lifespan by acting in distinct tissues, somatic versus germline, respectively. It is possible, however, that there is coordinated regulation of H3K4 trimethylation and H3K27 demethylation at genes that regulate lifespan. Indeed, evidence from a recent study in
C. elegans suggests that UTX-1 and the SET-16 methyltransferase function together in an MLL-like complex (
Fisher et al., 2010). Although SET-16 does not appear to regulate lifespan under the conditions tested (
Greer et al., 2010), UTX-1 and SET-16 may still cooperate to regulate lifespan under specific circumstances. UTX-1 could also associate with other methyltransferase complexes to regulate aging within the soma. In fact, two other methyltransferases (SET-9 and SET-15) regulate lifespan in a germline-independent manner (
Greer et al., 2010), raising the possibility that UTX-1 regulates lifespan together with one or both of these methyltransferases. Our results suggest that different chromatin modifying complexes, involving both methyltransferases and demethylases, regulate lifespan in the germline and in the soma. Understanding the interplay between these reversible epigenetic modifications in different tissues will give insights into mechanisms that slow – or possibly reverse – the aging process in multicellular organisms.