To our knowledge this study is the first to provide age-stratified data on co-existing meningitis in children of all ages with UTI. Our study is considerably larger than any previous study in this area with the exception of the recent study by Schnadover
et al. that exclusively investigated patients between 29 and 60 days of age
[3].
The aforementioned study by Bergstrom
et al. is frequently quoted as evidence that young children with UTI are at significant risk of co-existing meningitis
[10]. However, the limitations of this study have previously been highlighted, and it is likely that it considerably overestimates the risk of co-existing meningitis
[6],
[14]. Firstly, all urine samples in this study were obtained using urine bags, which are far more prone to contamination than samples obtained by sterile techniques (ie suprapubic aspiration or catheterization)
[27]. This may have led to a considerable number of false-positive urine culture results. Consequently, a significant proportion of patients with meningitis could falsely have been classified as having co-existing UTI. Secondly, only 31 (38.8%) of the 80 neonates with UTI in this study had a lumbar puncture. As it is likely that lumbar punctures were predominantly performed on the ‘sicker’-appearing neonates, this could have introduced a significant selection bias and skewed the reported rate of co-existing meningitis even further.
Since the publication by Bergstrom
et al., several other studies have investigated co-existing meningitis in children with UTI
[3],
[7],
[11]–
[19]. However, the majority are limited by the size of the study population, which in most instances comprised fewer than 200 patients with UTI who had a lumbar puncture
[4],
[14],
[17],
[19], or even less than 100 patients
[6],
[13],
[15],
[16],
[18]. This is a significant limitation, in the light of more recent data suggesting that co-existing meningitis is uncommon in patients with UTI.
The majority of previous studies have exclusively focused on infants under three months of age
[3]–
[6],
[10],
[12],
[14]–
[18], and the available data in older children are limited. In previous reports, the rates of co-existing meningitis in children with UTI varied between 0%
[6],
[12]–
[15],
[17],
[19] and 2%
[18]. However, a further limitation of previous studies is that only few have reported confidence intervals
[4],
[6], which are critically important for the interpretation of incidence data related to uncommon events. Our data show that the risk of co-existing meningitis in infants with UTI below the age of one month is not insignificant, with the true risk being between 0.15% and 4.36%. In contrast, in infants outside the neonatal age this risk is relatively small (between 0.00% and 0.74%).
Ginsburg and McCracken, who reported a study in 100 infants with UTI, found that the proportion of positive blood cultures correlated inversely with age
[13]. Positive blood cultures were observed in 31.4% of cases aged below 1 month, in 18.4% of cases aged 1 to 3 months, and in only 5.6% of cases aged 3 to 12 months. In view of the fact that co-existing bacterial meningitis in patients with UTI is generally the result of bacterial dissemination via the blood stream, this observation further supports the notion that the risk of co-existing meningitis declines significantly with increasing age.
While it could be argued that universal lumbar puncture would be the safest strategy in infants with UTI, this procedure is uncomfortable and can be associated with rare, but potentially serious complications, such as brainstem herniation, introduction of infectious organisms into the CSF and epidermoid tumors
[28]–
[30]. Based on our data, in conjunction with the results from other studies, we do not believe that universal lumbar puncture in children with UTI outside the neonatal age is necessary. This does not imply that lumbar puncture is not warranted in patients outside the neonatal period who have symptoms or signs indicating possible meningitis.
In our study, both patients with co-existing meningitis were neonates who presented with features suggestive of meningitis, including pyrexia, poor feeding, irritability and lethargy. However, clinical features are insufficiently sensitive to reliably rule out meningitis in neonates and typical meningeal signs are often absent in this age group
[9],
[31].
It is important to highlight that our study only includes data from patients who had paired urine and CSF results. Patients with UTI who did not have a lumbar puncture were not included, as the presence or absence of meningitis cannot be established. Consequently, our data are more likely to overestimate rather than underestimate the risk of co-existing meningitis, as clinicians are likely to have done a lumbar puncture preferentially on ‘sicker’-appearing children.
The spectrum and frequency of bacterial pathogens causing UTI in our study is consistent with previous pediatric studies, with
E. coli accounting for more than two thirds of infections
[3]–
[6],
[13],
[14],
[16],
[18],
[32],
[33]. Similar to other reports
Enterococcus,
Klebsiella and
Enterobacter species were also commonly implicated
[3],
[5]–
[7],
[14],
[16],
[18].
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of our study include the large sample size, the age-stratification of data and the quality of the urine samples included. More than half of the urine samples were obtained by suprapubic aspirate or catheterization, which are less prone to contamination than other sampling methods
[27]. Only a small proportion were documented to be bag urine samples. In addition, we excluded all urine samples with mixed growth to prevent the inclusion of patients with false-positive urine culture results.
Limitations of our study include its retrospective nature. We cannot exclude with absolute certainty the possibility that some patients had received antibiotics prior to the CSF sample being obtained, thereby potentially rendering their CSF culture false-negative, as we did not have data regarding the timing of the lumbar puncture and the initiation of antibiotic treatment. However, in the large majority (81.1%) of episodes CSF cultures were obtained on the same day as the urine sample. Also, antimicrobial activity was detected in the CSF in only 9.9% of the episodes. The vast majority of these patients had a normal CSF WBC count, while only ten had CSF pleocytosis. In only four of these could no alternative diagnosis be established; in none of these patients were microscopy and biochemical findings characteristic of bacterial meningitis. By assessing these aspects in detail we have limited the number of potentially false-negative CSF culture results, which adds to the robustness of our data. Notably, only one previous study, which included only 106 patients, has attempted to identify patients who had received antibiotics prior to lumbar puncture
[19].
Conclusions
Identification of co-existing meningitis in children presenting with UTI is critically important, as failure to detect CNS infection can result in partial treatment of meningitis with potentially severe long-term consequences
[8],
[9],
[31]. Our findings suggest that the risk of co-existing meningitis in infants with UTI under the age of one month is not insignificant. In contrast, outside the neonatal period this risk is small, indicating that a selective, rather than universal, approach to lumbar puncture is warranted.