Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of corrspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 December; 469(12): 3351–3355.
Published online 2011 May 18. doi:  10.1007/s11999-011-1915-x
PMCID: PMC3210276

Function Plateaus by One Year in Patients With Surgically Treated Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

Laura A. Schemitsch, Emil H. Schemitsch, MD, FRCS(C), Christian Veillette, MD, MSc, FRCS(C), Rad Zdero, PhD, and Michael D. McKee, MD, FRCS(C)corresponding author



Based on short-term (1 year or less) followup, primary fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures reportedly results in better function compared with that reported for nonoperative methods. Whether better function persists beyond 1 year is unclear.


For displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, do the better mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Shoulder (CSS) scores for operative versus nonoperative treatment at 1 year change between 1- and 2-year followup?

Patients and Methods

We previously reported 132 patients in a randomized prospective trial at 1 year, and here we report a further followup of 95 of the 132 patients (72%) at 2 years after injury. We evaluated all patients with the DASH and CSS scores.


The mean DASH and CSS scores were similar at 2 years compared with 1 year postinjury for both the nonoperated and operated patients. The mean scores for the operated patients remained higher than those in the nonoperative group (DASH operative 4.1 ± 7.0 versus DASH nonoperative 11.4 ± 19.7, CSS operative 97.1 ± 4.5 versus CSS nonoperative 91.6 ± 14.1) at 2 years postinjury.


The improvement in DASH and CSS scores seen with primary fixation of displaced clavicle fractures persists at 2 years but does not differ from values seen after 1 year of followup, suggesting a clinical steady state has been reached whereby outcome is unlikely to change with time.

Level of Evidence

Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Clavicle fractures represent 2.6% of all fractures and 44% of those involving the shoulder girdle [18]. Midshaft fractures are the most common and account for 81% of these injuries with 48% being displaced [20]. Clavicle fractures are traditionally treated nonoperatively with immobilization in a sling or a figure-of-eight bandage [21]. This has been the standard of care as a result of the greater than 99% union rates reported in several influential studies with large numbers of patients [14, 21]. However, the inclusion of pediatric fractures and lack of modern functional assessments in these studies may have resulted in unrealistically good results [20]. Conversely, some investigators present a 15% nonunion rate and a 30% dissatisfied rate in active patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures after closed treatment [7] with other studies showing similar trends [2, 12, 13, 15].

The Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) subsequently conducted a multicenter randomized trial comparing operative versus nonoperative care of these injuries [1]. At 1-year followup, higher mean Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Shoulder (CSS) scores were achieved in the operated patients [1]. However, that study and others [9] described short followup times of only 6 to 12 months. These time periods are often considered insufficient in the trauma literature for patients to have reached the point of maximal medical recovery after fracture. Two-year followup is generally required to determine whether function is maintained and to detect late complications such as infection, requirement for hardware removal, refracture, deterioration or improvement of outcome, or other unforeseen complications. Marsh and coworkers, for instance, noted deterioration in Ankle Osteoarthritis pain and disability scales for tibial plafond fractures between 6 months and 1 year followed by trends toward improvement between 1- and 2-year followup times [11]. Given the potential changes in pain and function 1 year after injury, a 2-year clinical update of our original 1-year COTS data is of clinical interest.

We therefore asked whether the mean DASH and CSS scores from the original cohort of the aforementioned COTS investigation would be the same at 1 and 2 years postinjury.

Patients and Methods

Our original COTS research trial was a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial [1]. Between April 2001 and December 2004, 132 patients were randomized to operative (ie, plate fixation, n = 67 patients) or nonoperative (ie, sling, n = 65 patients) care for completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Outcome measures were the DASH and CSS scores determined at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Among the original operated patients, there were 60 males and six females with a combined average age of 33.5 ± 12.1 years. Among the original nonoperative patients, there were 49 males and 17 females with a combined average age of 33.5 ± 12.7 years. Ninety-five of these original 132 patients (52, operative; 43, nonoperative) completed the 2-year (ie, 104 weeks) assessment for this current study. This was a young, predominantly male trauma population with a high migration rate and, thus, we were unable to locate the other 37 patients. Among the operated patients who completed the 2-year followup, there were 46 males, five females, and one patient with missing gender information, having a combined average age of 34.9 ± 12.6 years. Among the nonoperative patients who completed the 2-year followup, there were 31 males and 12 females with a combined average age of 33.9 ± 12.8 years.

The operated patients had surgery within 28 days after injury. The fracture was reduced and fixed with a small-fragment plate on the superior surface of the bone using a minimum of three screws in proximal and distal aspects of the clavicle. Comminuted fragments were secured with lag screws if possible while preserving soft tissue attachments, and a longer plate was used to maintain a minimum of three screws in principal proximal and distal fragments. If fragments were too small to accept fixation, they were secured and positioned under the plate with suture.

All seven nonoperated patients with symptomatic nonunions later underwent open reduction and internal fixation, and all nine patients with symptomatic malunions later requested osteotomy and correction of deformity. No shaving or ostectomy of the clavicle was performed for any patient.

Patients were seen at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks, and 104 weeks. At each visit, a focused history was taken and a physical examination was performed. Standardized AP and 20° upshot view radiographs were taken. A CSS score was then calculated, and the patient filled out DASH and SF-36 questionnaires. Five investigators (EHS, MDM, and other coworkers) from the original COTS and one of us (MDM) in the current study judged radiographic union in their own patients. We defined radiographic union as complete cortical bridging of all four projected cortices between proximal and distal fragments based on AP and 20° cephalad (nonorthogonal) radiographs. Each radiograph was evaluated by only one observer (MDM); we did not determine interobserver or intraobserver variability.

A repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted because DASH and CSS were measured repeatedly on the same patients at different times. The main effects of treatment were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance with treatment (operative or nonoperative) and time (6, 12, 24, 52, and 104 weeks) as independent factors. Tests were two-sided. Perfect scores for DASH and CSS, respectively, are 0 and 100.


There was no difference in mean DASH scores at 1 versus 2 years for the operated (p = 0.63) and nonoperated (p = 0.59) patients (Fig. 1). The mean DASH score was better (p = 0.014) in the operated patients at 104 weeks compared with that for the nonoperated patients: 4.1 versus 11.4, respectively. The operative group had better mean DASH scores at three of five followup time points, including at the 2-year followup.

Fig. 1
Graphic analysis comparing mean DASH scores in the operative and nonoperative groups. Values were statistically improved in the operative group at three of five followup times, namely, 6 weeks (p = 0.000), 52 weeks (p = 0.005), ...

There was no difference in mean CSS scores at 1 versus 2 years for the operated (p = 0.34) and nonoperated (p = 0.73) patients (Fig. 2). The CSS score was 97.1 in the operated patients at 104 weeks compared with 91.6 in the nonoperated patients (p = 0.012). The operated patients had higher CSS scores at all time points in the study.

Fig. 2
Graphic analysis comparing mean CSS scores in the operative and nonoperative groups. Values are statistically improved for the operative group at each followup time, namely, 6 weeks (p = 0.002), 12 weeks (p = 0.003), ...


The motivation for this study was to determine if the better mean DASH and CSS scores for operative versus nonoperative treatment at 1 year change between 1- and 2-year followup for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. We extended the followup time to 2 years for the patient cohort from our original COTS investigation [1] of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. DASH and CSS scores remained essentially unchanged at 2 years versus 1 year postinjury for both groups. Scores in the operative group remained statistically superior at all followup times for the CSS and at three of five followup times for the DASH.

There are several limitations to our study. First, a substantial number of patients was lost to followup. This was a young, predominantly male trauma population with a high degree of migration and, consequently, we were unable to locate the remaining 37 patients. However, this is a common feature of orthopaedic studies [5, 25], and we believe our conclusions are still valid given the congruence of current 2-year cohort demographic data with the 1-year cohort from our prior COTS study [1]. Second, 2 years of followup is still considered short-term for most orthopaedic studies. However, given the nature of the injury and clinical result (healed diaphyseal fracture with no articular involvement), we suspect patient deterioration or improvement is unlikely. Third, DASH and CSS scores do not consider individual patient differences resulting from age, general health, or personal problems. Even so, DASH and CSS have been used widely as standard measures of function [3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 19, 23, 24]. Fourth, there was substantial preoperative delay in some cases, so some fractures may have partially healed by 28 days. Although we do not believe this influenced outcome or risk to surgery, no data were analyzed in this regard. Finally, radiographic determination of union was made by multiple investigators. Interobserver and intraobserver variation was not quantified, although orthopaedic traumatologists may be more consistent in assessing the degree of long bone fracture healing from radiographs than community orthopaedic surgeons or orthopaedic residents [26].

Our results can be compared with other recent studies (Table 1) [3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 19, 23, 24]. Our investigation is the only one that compared nonoperative versus plating treatment using both DASH and CSS scores. For plating groups, our DASH score was superior to other studies with one exception, whereas our CSS was only slightly better than others. This may be the result of some patient deterioration during the longer followup times from most of the other studies. For nonoperative groups, our DASH and CSS results were within the range given by others.

Table 1
Comparison of present results with prior studies that assessed operative (ie, plate) or nonoperative (ie, sling or bandage) treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

We believe our data have clinical benefits. Patients can be initially counseled that improvements seen with primary fixation appear to last for 2 years, although we cannot state whether these findings will persist. Moreover, if patients treated nonoperatively are unsatisfied at 12 months postinjury, they can be counseled that they are unlikely to improve and may have reached maximal recovery. Additionally, as a result of the often young and mobile patient population having these injuries, long-term followup is more difficult. Thus, it is useful to know that the clinical results in this specific clinical situation may have reached a steady state at 1 year of followup. This would prevent the need for longer (and necessarily more expensive) assessment.

The economics of new products or techniques is increasingly scrutinized in the healthcare system [22]. Pearson et al. [17] examined the cost-effectiveness of primary fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) method. Interventions that cost less than $50,000 per QALY were believed cost-effective and reasonable. They concluded that the cost-effectiveness of fixation depended on the durability of the functional improvement compared with nonoperative treatment. When functional benefits persisted for more than 9 years, fixation had a favorable value (cost per QALY less than $50,000) compared with many accepted interventions. Our data suggest this difference is relatively static after 1 year and is unlikely to change. It is unlikely that another prospective, randomized clavicle fracture study will soon have a 2-year length of followup for both operative and nonoperative groups; thus, our data can be used as the best available evidence for economic calculations. With the data from our study, it also appears that on a QALY level, primary fixation for displaced clavicle fractures is likely to be cost-effective.

Midshaft clavicle fractures are common, and controversy exists regarding their management. Despite the current extension of the results by only 1 year beyond our original published study, this clinical update shows clearly that the improvement in outcome seen with primary fixation persists at 2 years and does not differ compared with 1-year data. This implies that a clinical steady state has been reached whereby function is unlikely to change later.


We thank Milena Vicente, RN, CCRP (Clinical Research Coordinator, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada) for her help in maintaining and obtaining patient clinical information at 2-year followup. We acknowledge Scott Mandel, Robert McCormack, and David Pugh for help in assessing the radiographs in our original COTS publication.


Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at St Michael’s Hospital and Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.


1. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1–10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Chan KY, Jupiter JB, Leffert RD, Marti R. Clavicle malunion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:287–290. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90146-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Chen CH, Chen JC, Wang C, Tien YC, Chang JK, Hung SH. Semitubular plates for acutely displaced midclavicular fractures: a retrospective study of 111 patients followed for 2.5 to 6 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:463–466. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817996fc. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Cho CH, Song KS, Min BW, Bae KC, Lee KJ. Operative treatment of clavicle midshaft fractures: comparison between reconstruction plate and reconstruction locking compression plate. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010;2:154–159. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.3.154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Connolly S, McKee MD, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Immediate plate osteosynthesis of open fractures of the humeral shaft. J Trauma. 2010 Jan 8 [Epub ahead of print]. [PubMed]
6. Faldini C, Nanni M, Leonetti D, Acri F, Galante C, Luciani D, Giannini S. Nonoperative treatment of closed displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Oct 9 [Epub ahead of print]. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:537–539. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.79B4.7529. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Jubel A, Andermahr J, Prokop A, Lee JI, Schiffer G, Rehm KE. Treatment of mid-clavicular fractures in adults. Early results after rucksack bandage or elastic stable intramedullary nailing [in German] Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:707–714. doi: 10.1007/s00113-005-0970-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Judd DB, Pallis MP, Smith E, Bottoni CR. Acute operative stabilization versus nonoperative management of clavicle fractures. Am J Orthop. 2009;38:341–345. [PubMed]
10. Khan SA, Shamshery P, Gupta V, Trikha V, Varshney MK, Kumar A. Locking compression plate in long standing clavicular nonunions with poor bone stock. J Trauma. 2008;64:439–441. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000238716.97303.b3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Marsh JL, McKinley T, Dirschl D, Pick A, Haft G, Anderson DD, Brown T. The sequential recovery of health status after tibial plafond fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:499–504. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c8ad52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C. Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:35–40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02795. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH. Midshaft malunions of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:790–797. [PubMed]
14. Neer CS., 2nd Nonunion of the clavicle. JAMA. 1960;172:1006–1011. [PubMed]
15. Nordqvist A, Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I. Mid-clavicle fractures in adults: end result study after conservative treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:572–576. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199811000-00008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. O’Connor D, Kutty S, McCabe JP. Long-term functional outcome assessment of plate fixation and autogenous bone grafting for clavicular non-union. Injury. 2004;35:575–579. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00239-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Pearson AM, Tosteson AN, Koval KJ, McKee MD, Cantu RV, Bell JE, Vicente M. Is surgery for displaced, midshaft clavicle fractures cost-effective? Results based on a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:426–433. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c3e505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Postacchini F, Gumina S, Sanits P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:452–456. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.126613. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Potter JM, Jones C, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Does delay matter? The restoration of objectively measured shoulder strength and patient-oriented outcome after immediate fixation versus delayed reconstruction of displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:514–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.01.001. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Preston C, Egol K. Midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67:52–57. [PubMed]
21. Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:29–42. doi: 10.1097/00003086-196805000-00006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M, Boden SD, Bourne RB, Bozic KJ, Jacobs JJ, Zdero R. The evidence-based approach in bringing new orthopaedic devices to market. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1030–1037. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01532. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M, Krappinger D, Kralinger FS. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures—a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:106–112. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318190cf88. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Stufkens SA, Kloen P. Treatment of midshaft clavicular delayed and non-unions with anteroinferior locking compression plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:159–164. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0864-2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Tokunaga K, Aslam N, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP. Effect of prior Salter or Chiari osteotomy on THA with developmental hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May 11 [Epub ahead of print]. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures (RUST) for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010;68:629–632. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7c16d. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research are provided here courtesy of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons