To our knowledge, this is the first detailed quantitative examination of VMAT2-immunoreactive species in different human brain regions. The major finding from a practical neuroimaging perspective is that the levels of VMAT2 protein in the cerebellar cortex and the widespread cerebral neocortical areas were all at least 100-fold lower than those in striatum. This supports the usefulness of these areas as potential reference regions for PET imaging of VMAT2 in the human. We also found that the human substantia nigra was different in VMAT2 immunoreactivity from the dopamine terminal regions by containing a distinct dominant 52

kDa band IIb that was preferentially lost in parkinsonian conditions.
The multiple bands (I, IIa, IIb, III, IV) of VMAT2 detected by the commonly used C-terminus antibodies (AB1767 used in this study and another similar antibody AB1598P from Chemicon, initially developed by
Erickson et al (1996) and Edwards and colleagues (
Peter et al, 1995), respectively) and their uncertain identity have been a major challenge for quantitative studies of VMAT2 protein in the brain. Many studies thus chose to examine only the major band detected (
Sandoval et al, 2002;
Haycock et al, 2003;
Little et al, 2003;
Gonzalez-Hernandez et al, 2004;
Fortune and Lurie, 2009), which in most cases has been the mature band I (
Wang et al, 1997;
Miller et al, 1999;
Haycock et al, 2003;
Little et al, 2003;
Gonzalez-Hernandez et al, 2004;
Jassen et al, 2005;
Cruz-Muros et al, 2008) although in a few instances a 55-kDa band was found to be the major band in rodent brains (
Holtje et al, 2003;
Duchemin et al, 2009;
Fortune and Lurie, 2009). The reason for the inconsistencies is not clear but could arise from differential sample preparation, particular Western blot conditions and antibody used, and/or the batch-to-batch variance of the antibodies. We have used four batches of the same version (AB1767) of the rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the C-terminus 19 amino acids of human VMAT2 from different commercial sources and have obtained the same results as observed by most of the studies, that is, the 75-kDa band I was dominant but accounted for only ~50% of total VMAT2 immunoreactivity in the striatum.
In the present study, by using a newly available monoclonal antibody, by examining multiple brain regions, and by including brain of patients with degenerative parkinsonism, we established that (1) the minor smaller bands III and IV are most likely N-terminal truncated forms of VMAT2; (2) the banding pattern described above in the striatum (I, IIa, III, IV) also applies to most of the monoamine terminal fields except in the nigral dopamine cell body region (and its close proximity regions including red nucleus, subthalamic nucleus, and GPi), in which a band (IIb) of slightly smaller MW than that of band IIa could be detected; and (3) the overall extent of loss of VMAT2 immunoreactivity in the brain regions of patients with PD was correlated with the expected degree of dopaminergic neuronal damage (putamen>caudate>substantia nigra). An exception is band IIb in substantia nigra, with the extent of loss similar to that observed in the terminal regions caudate and putamen. This interesting finding, together with the limited distribution of band IIb in human brain that might be related to the distance from the dopamine cell body (e.g., GPi versus GPe), suggest that VMAT2 IIb might be the precursor to IIa and I being posttranslationally modified and transported to the terminals. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that bands I/IIa/b might represent the transporter associated with different monoaminergic neurons or different subcellular structures, for example, small synaptic vesicles versus large dense core vesicles (
Nirenberg et al, 1996). The lack of an aging change of VMAT2 protein in the nigrostriatal system in our limited sample size and within a limited age span is nonetheless consistent with a previous Western blotting study (
Haycock et al, 2003) and a recent PET VMAT2 imaging report (
Troiano et al, 2010) although the question of the influence of aging on striatal VMAT2 in the human is still controversial (cf.
Troiano et al, 2010).
Notwithstanding the generic limitation of Western blot investigations that bands with different MW could well be differentially transferred and detected, we attempted to measure the levels of total, intact, and mature VMAT2 proteins. As the tetrabenazine-binding site on VMAT2 has been mapped to the juxtaposed N- and C-terminals (
Sievert and Ruoho, 1997), in particular a conserved phenylalanine (F135 of hVMAT2) in the second transmembrane domain (
Gros and Schuldiner, 2010) and glycosylation does not appear to influence the transporter's activity and binding of tetrabenazine (
Yelin et al, 1998), the VMAT2 proteins that are capable of binding DTBZ might include all the intact species, that is, I, IIa, and IIb, but not the N-terminally truncated III and IV. However, since the distribution patterns of total, intact, and mature VMAT2 immunoreactivity were all similar, possibly differential DTBZ-binding capacity of the different VMAT2 species should reasonably not affect the regional pattern of DTBZ binding (except, possibly, in the substantia nigra due to the unique abundance of VMAT2 IIb). Indeed, the overall brain distribution of VMAT2 proteins was generally consistent with
in vivo PET imaging data with (+)-[
11C]DTBZ (
Koeppe et al, 1999) and with findings of the
in vitro radioligand-binding study of autopsied human brain by [
3H]DTBZ (
Scherman et al, 1988), showing striatum
![[dbl greater-than sign]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/x226B.gif)
substantia nigra (midbrain), hypothalamus>globus pallidus, hippocampus, thalamus>cerebral cortices (occipital and cerebellar cortices were not measured in the Scherman study).
However, one notable difference between the results of our
in vitro measurement of VMAT2 protein and the
in vivo PET imaging of [
11C]DTBZ binding was in cerebellum. Whereas we did not observe any difference in VMAT2 protein levels between the cerebellar cortex and the cerebral neocortices, PET imaging detects small but consistently higher binding in the cerebellum or cerebellar cortex (
Kilbourn et al, 1993;
Chan et al, 1999;
Koeppe et al, 1999). Therefore, the cerebral cortical regions, in particular the occipital cortex rather than cerebellar cortex, have been the preferred reference region for PET VMAT2 imaging. One possible explanation for the
in vitro versus
in vivo ‘discrepancy' is that VMAT2 protein levels determined in autopsied brains might not correspond to that available for binding of the radioligand
in vivo due to a variety of uncertain factors including differential subcellular localization and posttranslational modification status of the transporter, for example, phosphorylation. Possible differences in nonspecific binding profiles of the tracer among different brain regions could also be a contributing factor. Alternatively, differences in VMAT2 binding between cerebellar and cerebral cortices as assessed by PET imaging might be explained by other imaging variables, for example, partial volume effects. The cerebral and cerebellar cortices are quite different in anatomical structure, with the former having a much smaller surface area/volume ratio and lower percentage of surface area hidden within fissures than the latter (
Henery and Mayhew, 1989), which could cause more marked partial volume effects and artificially lower binding in cerebral versus cerebellar cortices. In this regard, previous PET studies of [
11C]flumazenil (
Aston et al, 2002) and [
11C]-arachidonic acid (
Giovacchini et al, 2004) brain uptake have disclosed a larger effect of partial volume correction in most regions of the cerebral cortices than in the cerebellar cortex.
In conclusion, although no cerebral gray matter region in the human brain is free of VMAT2 protein, levels of the transporter in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex were sufficiently low to satisfy this criterion as a reference region in PET VMAT2 imaging. We also found that the cerebellar cortex and the (now preferred reference region) occipital cortex were not different in VMAT2 protein concentrations. Differences in PET VMAT2 binding between the two regions might in this respect provide an example of bias caused by imaging variables such as partial volume effects in the reference region.