STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic-di-GMP

doi:10.1038/nature10429

Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 April 27.

Published in final edited form as:

Nature. 2011 September 25; 478(7370): 515–518.

doi: 10.1038/nature10429

PMCID: PMC3203314

NIHMSID: NIHMS316132

STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic-di-GMP

Dara L. Burdette,¹ Kathryn M. Monroe,¹ Katia Sotelo-Troha,¹ Jeff S. Iwig,^1,² Barbara Eckert,¹ Mamoru Hyodo,³ Yoshihiro Hayakawa,⁴ and Russell E. Vance¹

¹Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

²Department of Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

³Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 12, Nishi 6, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan

⁴Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Aichi Institute of Technology, 1247 Yachigusa, Yakusa, Toyota 470-0392, Japan

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.E.V. (Email: rvance/at/berkeley.edu)

Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Nature

See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.

Abstract

The innate immune system detects infection by employing germline-encoded receptors specific for conserved microbial molecules. Recognition of microbial ligands leads to the production of cytokines, such as type I interferons (IFN), that are essential for successful pathogen elimination. Cytosolic detection of pathogen-derived DNA is one major mechanism of IFN induction^1,2, and requires signaling via Tank Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1), and its downstream transcription factor, Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3). In addition, a transmembrane protein called STING (STimulator of INterferon Genes; also called MITA, ERIS, MPYS, TMEM173) functions as an essential signaling adaptor linking cytosolic detection of DNA to the TBK1/IRF3 signaling axis^3–7. Recently, unique nucleic acids called cyclic dinucleotides, which function as conserved signaling molecules in bacteria⁸, were also shown to induce a STING-dependent type I interferon response^9–12. However, a mammalian sensor of cyclic dinucleotides has not been identified. Here we report evidence that STING itself is an innate immune sensor of cyclic dinucleotides. We demonstrate that STING binds directly to radiolabelled cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP) and that this binding is competed by unlabelled cyclic dinucleotides but not by other nucleotides or nucleic acids. Furthermore, we identify mutations in STING that selectively affect the response to cyclic dinucleotides without affecting the response to DNA. Thus, STING appears to function as a direct sensor of cyclic dinucleotides, in addition to its established role as a signaling adaptor in the interferon response to cytosolic DNA. Cyclic dinucleotides have shown promise as novel vaccine adjuvants and immunotherapeutics^9,13. Our results provide insight into the mechanism by which cyclic dinucleotides are sensed by the innate immune system.

Although nucleotides are critical signaling molecules in all domains of life, cyclic dinucleotides appear to be produced solely by bacteria and archaea. For example, c-di-GMP is a ubiquitous second messenger that regulates biofilm formation, motility, and virulence in diverse bacterial species⁸. Recently, cyclic diadenylate monophosphate (c-di-AMP) was discovered as a bacterial regulatory molecule¹⁴, although its role remains to be fully characterized. Since they are unique to microbes, cyclic dinucleotides serve as appropriate targets for immune recognition¹⁵. Indeed, induction of IFN by Listeria monocytogenes depends on bacterial secretion of cyclic-di-AMP¹². However, it remains unclear how cyclic dinucleotides are sensed in mammalian cells.

To address the mechanism by which mammalian cells sense cyclic dinucleotides, we first confirmed that cyclic dinucleotides are detected in the host cell cytosol¹⁰ by expressing RocR, a c-di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in the cytosol of macrophages. In these cells, IFN induction by c-di-GMP (but not other stimuli) is reduced 10-fold compared to vector transduced cells (Fig. 1a), confirming that the cytosolic presence of c-di-GMP is important to induce IFN.

Figure 1

STING is sufficient to restore responsiveness to cyclic dinucleotides

To identify candidate cyclic dinucleotide sensors, we sought to identify molecules that could reconstitute the IFN response to cyclic dinucleotides in HEK293T cells, which do not respond to c-di-GMP¹⁰. Since STING is essential for the IFN response to cyclic dinucleotides¹¹, and STING expression is low/undetectable in HEK293T cells (Supplementary Fig. 1, data not shown), we first expressed STING in HEK293T cells. Overexpression of STING spontaneously induces an IFN reporter^3,6,7, so we transfected a low amount of STING that by itself was insufficient to induce IFN. To our surprise, low levels of STING were sufficient to reconstitute responsiveness of 293T cells to c-di-GMP (Fig. 1b) and c-di-AMP (Fig. 1c). By contrast, the non-functional goldenticket (gt) allele of STING (I199N)¹¹ did not restore responsiveness to c-di-GMP (Fig. 1b). Interestingly, expression of wild-type STING did not confer responsiveness of 293T cells to double-stranded (ds) DNA oligonucleotides (e.g., vaccinia virus (VV) 70mer or interferon stimulatory DNA (ISD)) that were previously shown to induce type I IFN in macrophages via STING^4,16 (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 2a). By contrast, induction of IFN by poly(dAT:dTA) DNA was identical in cells transfected with wild-type or gt Sting, demonstrating that the Pol III DNA-sensing pathway^17,18 is intact in these cells and is not responsible for detection of c-di-GMP (Fig. 1d). As a positive control, Myd88^−/−Trif^−/−immortalized macrophages, which express STING, responded similarly to c-di-GMP, poly(dAT:dTA), VV 70mer and ISD (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. 2b). Our results demonstrate STING expression is sufficient to restore responsiveness of HEK293T cells to cyclic dinucleotides but not to DNA.

We next tested whether STING, or perhaps another protein in HEK293T cells, binds to c-di-GMP. We used an in-vitro ultraviolet (UV) crosslinking assay to identify putative sensor protein(s) in HEK293T cell lysates that interact directly with radiolabelled c-di-GMP (c-di-GMP³²⁾. We expected to identify directly interacting proteins since only molecules within bond length proximity are efficiently crosslinked by UV¹⁹. We detected a prominent ~40 kDa radiolabelled protein, corresponding to the predicted molecular weight of monomeric STING, in lysates of cells transfected with STING-HA, but not in lysates of cells transfected with STING-HA I199N or vector only (Fig. 2a). The ~40 kDa band did not appear when the same lysates were crosslinked with GTP³², implying that crosslinking to c-di-GMP³² was specific (Fig. 2a). We also observed an ~80 kDa species that possibly corresponds to a previously reported STING dimer⁶ (Fig. 2b). To test the hypothesis that STING crosslinks with c-di-GMP³², we immunoprecipitated STING from transfected HEK293T cells, and performed the c-di-GMP³² binding assay on the immunoprecipitate. Bands corresponding to the molecular weight of STING monomer and dimer were identified only in immunoprecipitates of lysates overexpressing STING and not in mock immunoprecipitates of lysates of vector-transfected cells (Fig. 2b). Thus, STING appears to bind c-di-GMP.

Figure 2

STING binds cyclic dinucleotides

To confirm that binding of c-di-GMP³² to STING is specific, we performed the c-di-GMP binding assay in the presence of unlabelled nucleotides. Unlabelled c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP specifically competed with c-di-GMP³² for binding to STING (Fig. 2c, d). By contrast, GTP, other guanosine derivatives, or nucleic acids (including dsDNA), competed away non-specific binding (asterisks, Fig. 2c, d), but, under our specific assay conditions, could not compete efficiently with c-di-GMP³² for binding to STING (arrows, Fig. 2c, d). Since the cell cytosol contains high (0.1–1mM) concentrations of GTP, a putative c-di-GMP sensor must exhibit a high degree of specificity for c-di-GMP over GTP. We found that c-di-GMP efficiently crosslinked to STING even in the presence of 1mM GTP (Fig. 2c).

Although these data imply that STING directly and specifically binds cyclic dinucleotides, they do not address whether other host proteins might also be required. STING is predicted to encode an N-terminal domain with multiple transmembrane segments, followed by a globular C-terminal domain (CTD). Since the CTD contains the amino acid substitution (I199N) that abolishes STING function in goldenticket mice¹¹, we hypothesized that the CTD might be involved in binding cyclic dinucleotides. Thus, we subjected purified recombinant His₆-tagged CTD of STING (amino acids 138–378) (Fig. 2e) to the c-di-GMP³² binding assay. We found that the recombinant CTD of STING bound c-di-GMP³², and that binding was specifically competed with cold c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP but not cold GTP or ATP (Fig. 2f). We used equilibrium dialysis to obtain an estimate of ~5μM for the affinity (K_d) of c-di-GMP binding to the STING CTD (Fig. 2g). In its native membrane-bound form, or in complex with other host factors, STING may exhibit a stronger affinity for c-di-GMP; nevertheless, a 5μM affinity is consistent with the dose response previously observed in macrophages¹². Consistent with the ability of STING to dimerize⁶, the binding data suggest a stoichiometry of one molecule of c-di-GMP per two molecules of STING.

In order to identify amino acids involved in c-di-GMP binding and/or IFN induction, we introduced point mutations into STING. Focusing on clusters of conserved and charged residues, we mutated a total of 67 amino acids, individually or in groups, and identified mutants that fell in one of five categories (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 3–4). Class I consists of mutations that abolish both binding and IFN induction (Fig. 3a–c, red, Supplementary Table 1). Class II mutants bind c-di-GMP but fail to induce IFN (Fig. 3c, purple). Class III comprises “hyperactive” mutants that spontaneously induce IFN at low levels of transfection (Fig. 3a–c, green, Supplementary Table 1). Class IV mutants induced IFN when overexpressed, but were not inducible in response to c-di-GMP (Fig. 3a–c, blue, Supplementary Table 1). Class V consists of mutants that had no effect on binding or IFN induction (Fig. 3c, yellow, Supplementary Table 1). Although mutation of STING can result in diverse phenotypes, a key finding is that all mutants that failed to bind c-di-GMP also lost the ability to induce IFN in response to c-di-GMP. Consistent with our observation that the CTD is sufficient to bind c-di-GMP (Fig. 2f), all mutations that affected c-di-GMP binding were located within the CTD.

Figure 3

Mutational analysis of STING

DNA and cyclic dinucleotides induce indistinguishable transcriptional responses in macrophages¹⁰ and STING appears essential for both responses^4,11. However, in contrast to cyclic dinucleotides, we found STING expression is insufficient to restore responsiveness of HEK293T cells to DNA (Fig. 1). Moreover, our competition assays indicate that DNA does not compete with cyclic-di-GMP for binding to STING under the conditions tested (Fig. 2d). Thus, while our data indicate STING functions as a direct immunosensor of cyclic dinucleotides, additional host proteins appear likely to be involved in IFN induction by DNA. Indeed, two candidate DNA sensors, DAI and IFI16, have been identified^16,20, neither of which appear to be essential for the response to cyclic dinucleotides (¹⁰; unpublished data). To determine if responsiveness to cyclic dinucleotides and DNA are separable functions of STING, we sought to identify STING mutants that fail to respond to cyclic dinucleotides but still respond to DNA. We identified a STING mutant (R231A) that was unresponsive to c-di-GMP (Fig. 4a), though it still induced IFN when overexpressed (Fig. 4a) and still bound c-di-GMP (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, STING R231A was able to restore responsiveness of goldenticket bone marrow macrophages to DNA, but not to cyclic-di-GMP (Fig. 4c). Thus, cyclic dinucleotide sensing and DNA sensing can be uncoupled, suggesting that these two pathways are discrete but share STING as a common signaling molecule. It is unexpected that STING would function both as a direct immunosensor (of cyclic dinucleotides) and as a signaling adaptor (in the response to DNA). One possibility is that STING initially evolved as a cyclic dinucleotide sensor and was subsequently coopted for DNA sensing.

Figure 4

The IFN response to DNA and c-di-GMP can be uncoupled

We previously used mouse mutagenesis to identify STING as an essential molecule in the in vivo IFN response to cyclic dinucleotides¹¹. The requirement for STING can now be rationalized by our proposal that STING functions as a direct sensor of cyclic dinucleotides. Interestingly, STING does not share homology with any known immunosensor, and therefore appears to represent a novel category of microbial detector. Although a BLAST search of the mouse proteome for homologs of the Listeria diadenylate cyclase (lmo2120; DacA) identifies STING as the top hit, the homology is limited to a short region of the STING CTD (amino acids 311–358). STING does not appear to exhibit homology to PilZ-domain proteins that function as c-di-GMP receptors in bacteria⁸. Structural studies are required to determine if STING resembles any known proteins in mammals or bacteria.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that cyclic dinucleotides are potent immunostimulatory compounds that may be valuable as novel immunotherapeutics or adjuvants^9,13. Therapeutic development of cyclic dinucleotides will be greatly facilitated by an improved understanding of the mechanism by which they are sensed. Furthermore, our finding that STING is a direct detector of cyclic dinucleotides provides insight into the fundamental mechanisms by which the innate immune system can detect bacterial infection.

Methods Summary

Transfections

Transfections were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). C-di-AMP was introduced into cells using digitonin permeabilization as previously described¹².

Recombinant STING

DNA encoding the carboxy terminal domain of mouse STING (nucleotides 414 - 1137) was cloned into pET28a for recombinant protein expression in E. coli.

UV Crosslinking

C-di-GMP³² was enzymatically synthesized using recombinant WspR and used in a UV-crosslinking assay as described previously²¹. Briefly, 50 μg of HEK293T cell lysate at a final concentration of 2 μg/μl, or 1 μg of recombinant His₆-tagged STING, was incubated with 2 μCi of c-di-GMP³² in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1mM MgCl₂) for 15 minutes at room temperature. Reactions were UV irradiated at 254 nm and separated by SDS-PAGE.

Methods

Cell lines and animals

C57BL/6 Myd88^−/−Trif^−/− knockout mice were obtained from G. Barton (University of California, Berkeley) and immortalized macrophages were generated as previously described²². Immortalized bone marrow macrophages were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin-streptomycin, and glutamine. HEK293T cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin-streptomycin, and glutamine. Animal use was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at UC Berkeley.

Plasmids

A construct encoding RocR (NP_252636) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa was a generous gift from Steve Lory²³. RocR was cloned into the MSCV2.2 retroviral expression construct upstream of an IRES-GFP. MSCV-rocR was transduced into immortalized macrophages from Myd88^−/−Trif^−/− mice and cells were sorted for GFP expression. Mouse Sting and the goldenticket (I199N) mutant allele of Sting were cloned into pcDNA3 with a carboxy terminal hemagglutinin (HA) tag as described previously¹¹. DNA encoding the carboxy terminal domain of mouse Sting (nucleotides 414 - 1137) was cloned into pET28a for recombinant protein expression in E. coli.

Site-directed mutagenesis

Mutations in Sting were generated using the QuikChange Site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Reagents

C-di-GMP was synthesized as described previously²⁴. Purified C-di-AMP was the generous gift of Josh Woodward and Dan Portnoy (University of California, Berkeley). Poly(dAT:dTA), GTP, ATP, GMP, and guanosine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Poly(I:C) was purchased from Invivogen. Guanosine-3’,5’-bisdiphosphate (ppGpp) was obtained from Trilink. Sendai virus (SeV) was purchased from Charles River Laboratories. Theiler’s virus (TMEV) strain GDVII was from M. Brahic and E. Freundt (Stanford). Single-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the Vaccinia Virus dsDNA 70-mer were purchased from Elim BIOPHARM and were annealed as described^2,16.

Cell stimulations

All transfections (excluding c-di-AMP) were carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Vaccinia virus 70mer was transfected at a final concentration of 0.5 μg/ml. C-di-GMP, poly(dAT:dTA), and poly(I:C) transfected at a final concentration of 4 μg/ml. C-di-AMP was used at a final concentration of 5.4 mM and stimulation was performed using digitonin permeabilization as previously described¹².

Luciferase Assay

HEK293T cells were plated in TC-treated 96 well plates at 0.5 × 10⁶ cells/ml. The next day, cells were transfected as indicated along with IFNβ-firefly and TK-Renilla luciferase reporter constructs. Following stimulation for 6 hours with the indicated ligands, cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer (Promega) for 5 minutes at room temperature. Lysates were incubated with firefly luciferase substrate (Biosynth) and Renilla luciferase substrate coelenterazine (Biotium) and luminescence was measured on a SpectraMaxL (Molecular Devices). Relative IFNβ expression is calculated as firefly luminescence relative to Renilla luminescence.

Quantitative PCR

Analysis of IFNβ expression in bone marrow macrophages was conducted as previously described¹⁰.

Synthesis of c-di-GMP³²

Synthesis of c-di-GMP³² was carried as described²¹. Briefly, recombinant His₆-tagged WspR was incubated with GTP-alpha-P³² (3000 Ci/mmol, 10 μCi/μl, Amersham Biosciences) for 2 hours at room temperature, followed by heat inactivation of WspR at 95°C for 5 minutes. Residual GTP³² was removed by incubation with calf intestinal phosphatase (New England Biolabs) for 10 minutes at 37°C. CIP was heat inactivated at 95°C for 5 minutes following by centrifugation at 16000 × g for 5 minutes. The GTP³² used as a negative control was prepared identically except His₆-tagged WspR was omitted from the preparation. Radiolabelled nucleotides were quantified by separation by thin-layer chromatography on PEI-cellulose (Machery-Nagel) using 1.5 M KH₂PO₄, pH 3.65 (Supplementary Figure 5).

Preparation of HEK293T cell lysates and immunoprecipitations

HEK293T cells were plated at a density of 1 × 10⁶ cells/well of a six well plate. The following day, cells were transfected with pcDNA3 or pcDNA3 expressing HA-tagged wild type or mutant STING using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The following day, cells were rinsed once with phosphate buffered saline followed by removal with PBS with EDTA (1 mM) into eppendorf tubes. Cells were pelleted briefly by centrifugation at 1000 × g at 4°C. The cell pellet was lysed in an equal volume of digitonin lysis buffer (0.5% digitonin, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) containing protease inhibitors (Roche) for 10 minutes on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10 minutes. The protein concentration was measured in the resulting supernatant using the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). Cell lysates were subjected to a c-di-GMP binding assay (see below). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with rat anti-HA antibodies (Roche) to confirm STING-HA expression and mouse anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). To immunoprecipitate HA-tagged STING, cell lysates were prepared similarly in digitonin lysis buffer and incubated with anti-HA conjugated agarose beads (Sigma) for 2 hours at 4°C. Washed beads were subjected to a c-di-GMP binding assay or separated by SDS-PAGE as described and stained with colloidal blue protein stain (Thermo).

C-di-GMP binding assay

The c-di-GMP binding assay was based on a method described previously²¹. Briefly, 50 μg of HEK293T cell lysate at a final concentration of 2μg/μl, or 1 μg of recombinant His₆-tagged STING, was incubated with 2 μCi of radiolabelled nucleotide in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl) for 15 minutes at room temperature. Reactions were irradiated at 254 nm for 20 minutes on ice at a 3 cm distance with a UVG-54 mineral light lamp (UVP). Immediately following crosslinking, the reaction was terminated by the addition of SDS sample buffer (40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 2% βME, 40 mM EDTA, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) boiled for 5 minutes at 100°C and separated by SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried and exposed to a phosphor screen and visualized using a Typhoon Trio (GE Healthcare).

Protein purification

The construct expressing a constitutively active form of WspR (pQE-WspR*) was a generous gift from Steve Lory^23,25. Purification of His₆-tagged WspR was carried out as described previously using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Qiagen)²⁶. DNA encoding the carboxy terminal domain of mouse STING (nucleotides 414 - 1137) was cloned into pET28a and purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen).

Equilibrium dialysis

The binding affinity of radioactive c-di-GMP was measured by equilibrium dialysis using a 96-well equilibrium dialyzer (Harvard Apparatus) with a 5,000 molecular weight cut-off membrane. One chamber contained 150 μL of 10 μM purified H₆-STING(138 – 378) in assay buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl₂, 10% glycerol) while the other was filled with 150 μL of c-di-GMP³² in a range of concentrations from 40 nM to 160 μM. Equilibrium was reached after 48 hours at 25°C and three samples were drawn from each chamber and mixed with 2 mL of Econo-safe scintillation fluid. Samples were measured in an LS 6000 IC (Beckman). Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software. K_d, B_max , and h (Hill slope) were generated using non-linear regression allowing for one site specific binding with a Hill slope.

Supplementary Material

Click here to view.^{(39K, doc)}

Click here to view.^{(482K, pdf)}

Click here to view.^{(1.3M, pdf)}

Click here to view.^{(1007K, pdf)}

Acknowledgments

We thank Hans Carlson, Kathy Collins, Sarah McWhirter, David Raulet, Kimmen Sjölander, and members of the Vance, Barton and Portnoy labs at UC Berkeley for advice and discussions. We thank J. Woodward and D. Portnoy for their gift of purified c-di-AMP. Work in R.E.V.’s laboratory is supported by Investigator Awards from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund and the Cancer Research Institute and by NIH grants AI075039, AI080749, and AI063302. D.L.B. is supported by an NIH NRSA fellowship F32 (AI091100).

Footnotes

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

Author Contributions: D.L.B. performed the luciferase assays, qRT-PCR, generated c-di-GMP³², purified recombinant STING, performed c-di-GMP binding assays, and transduced goldenticket bone marrow macrophages. K.M.M. generated truncation mutations and performed luciferase assays. K.S-T. generated point mutants and performed luciferase assays. D.L.B., K.M.M and R.E.V. participated in study design and data analysis. D.L.B. and R.E.V. wrote the paper. B.E. contributed to protein purification methods. J.S.I. contributed to the design of ITC and equilibrium dialysis experiments and analysis of binding data. M.H. and Y.H. synthesized c-di-GMP.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Statistical Analysis: Statistical differences were calculated with an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test using GraphPad Prism 5.0b.

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.

References

1. Ishii KJ, et al. A Toll-like receptor-independent antiviral response induced by double-stranded B-form DNA. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:40–48. [PubMed]

2. Stetson DB, Medzhitov R. Recognition of cytosolic DNA activates an IRF3-dependent innate immune response. Immunity. 2006;24:93–103. [PubMed]

3. Ishikawa H, Barber GN. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature. 2008;455:674–678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

4. Ishikawa H, Ma Z, Barber GN. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature. 2009;461:788–792. [PubMed]

5. Jin L, et al. MPYS, a novel membrane tetraspanner, is associated with major histocompatibility complex class II and mediates transduction of apoptotic signals. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28 [PMC free article] [PubMed]

6. Sun W, et al. ERIS, an endoplasmic reticulum IFN stimulator, activates innate immune signaling through dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:8653–8658. [PubMed]

7. Zhong B, et al. The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. Immunity. 2008;29:538–550. [PubMed]

8. Tamayo R, Pratt JT, Camilli A. Roles of cyclic diguanylate in the regulation of bacterial pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007;61:131–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

9. Karaolis DK, et al. Bacterial c-di-GMP is an immunostimulatory molecule. J Immunol. 2007;178:2171–2181. [PubMed]

10. McWhirter SM, et al. A host type I interferon response is induced by cytosolic sensing of the bacterial second messenger cyclic-di-GMP. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1899–1911. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

11. Sauer JD, et al. The N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-induced Goldenticket mouse mutant reveals an essential function of Sting in the in vivo interferon response to Listeria monocytogenes and cyclic dinucleotides. Infect Immun. 2010;79:688–694. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

12. Woodward JJ, Iavarone AT, Portnoy DA. c-di-AMP secreted by intracellular Listeria monocytogenes activates a host type I interferon response. Science. 2010;328:1703–1705. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

13. Chen W, Kuolee R, Yan H. The potential of 3',5'-cyclic diguanylic acid (c-di-GMP) as an effective vaccine adjuvant. Vaccine. 2010;28:3080–3085. [PubMed]

14. Witte G, Hartung S, Buttner K, Hopfner KP. Structural biochemistry of a bacterial checkpoint protein reveals diadenylate cyclase activity regulated by DNA recombination intermediates. Mol Cell. 2008;30:167–178. [PubMed]

15. Janeway CA., Jr Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1989;54(Pt 1):1–13. [PubMed]

16. Unterholzner L, et al. IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:997–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

17. Ablasser A, et al. RIG-I-dependent sensing of poly(dA:dT) through the induction of an RNA polymerase III-transcribed RNA intermediate. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1065–1072. [PubMed]

18. Chiu YH, Macmillan JB, Chen ZJ. RNA Polymerase III Detects Cytosolic DNA and Induces Type I Interferons through the RIG-I Pathway. Cell. 2009;138:576–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

19. Chodosh LA. UV crosslinking of proteins to nucleic acids. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2001;Chapter 12(Unit 12):15. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1205s36. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

20. Takaoka A, et al. DAI (DLM-1/ZBP1) is a cytosolic DNA sensor and an activator of innate immune response. Nature. 2007;448:501–505. [PubMed]

21. Merighi M, Lee VT, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Lory S. The second messenger bis-(3'-5')-cyclic-GMP and its PilZ domain-containing receptor Alg44 are required for alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2007;65:876–895. [PubMed]

22. Broz P, von Moltke J, Jones JW, Vance RE, Monack DM. Differential requirement for Caspase-1 autoproteolysis in pathogen-induced cell death and cytokine processing. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;8:471–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

23. Kulasakara H, et al. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases reveals a role for bis-(3'-5')-cyclic-GMP in virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2839–2844. [PubMed]

24. Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y. An improved method for synthesizing cyclic bis(3′-5′)diguanylic acid (c-di-GMP) Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2004;77:2089–2093.

25. Simm R, Remminghorst U, Ahmad I, Zakikhany K, Romling U. A role for the EAL-like protein STM1344 in regulation of CsgD expression and motility in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:3928–3937. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

26. De N, et al. Phosphorylation-independent regulation of the diguanylate cyclase WspR. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e67. [PMC free article] [PubMed]