We previously demonstrated that
BTN2, a gene up-regulated in the absence of
BTN1, encodes a component of a transport complex that retrieves specific proteins back to the Golgi (
Kama et al., 2007). We now show that in the absence of
BTN1, Golgi proteins like Yif1 and TGN-EE proteins like Kex2 fail to retrieve to the Golgi and accumulate in late compartments of the endosomal pathway ( and Tables S1 and S2). This is indicated by the colocalization of Yif1 and Kex2 with FM4-64 and/or Vps27 in cells lacking
BTN1 (). This phenotype shared between
btn1Δ and
btn2Δ cells implies common defects in the sorting of material away from the vacuole to the Golgi. Thus, defects in LE–Golgi protein recycling may contribute to the mechanism underlying Batten Disease/NCL pathogenesis.
Yeast Btn1 and mammalian CLN3 are membrane proteins of unclear function, and, although a wide range of localization patterns and actions have been attributed to them, recent studies from
S. cerevisiae (
Vitiello et al., 2010),
S. pombe (
Codlin and Mole, 2009), and mammalian cells (
Metcalf et al., 2008) imply that Golgi localization and/or function may be involved. We find that
S. cerevisiae Btn1 expressed from its chromosomal locus or from single-copy plasmids localizes to Golgi structures () that colabel with either Yif1 or Sec7 (). Thus, although Btn1 and Btn2 have distinct patterns of localization (i.e., Btn2 localizes to LEs;
Kama et al., 2007), both contribute to the same transport process. However, Btn1 probably acts in a different manner than Btn2, which binds to retrieval factors like retromer, endosomal SNAREs, Snx4, and even to Yif1 (
Kama et al., 2007). Studies made with cultured mammalian cells or fission yeast suggest that CLN3 and btn1 act in an unknown fashion upon protein export from the Golgi and mislocalize the mannose-6-phosphate receptor or its
S. pombe equivalent, vps10, respectively, to varying degrees (
Metcalf et al., 2008;
Codlin and Mole, 2009). In contrast, Vps10 and CPY trafficking is normal in
btn1Δ cells (Fig. S1, A and B), as observed for
btn2Δ cells (
Kama et al., 2007;
Kanneganti et al., 2011). This suggests that the Vps10–CPY sorting pathway of
S. cerevisiae differs from that of
S. pombe. This difference may relate to the finding that both Btn2 and Vps10 colocalize with Vps27 but do not colocalize with each other (
Kama et al., 2007), indicating that there may be different LE populations in budding yeast.
Despite differences in Vps10–CPY trafficking, our results suggest that
S. cerevisiae Btn1 controls protein trafficking within the Golgi.
BTN1 overexpression inhibited Ykt6, an R-SNARE that confers intra-Golgi protein sorting and protein trafficking into and out of the Golgi, from assembling into a canonical 1R–3Q complex with an essential Golgi Q-SNARE, Sed5, and two additional Q-SNAREs implicated in endosome–Golgi trafficking, Vti1 and Tlg1 (). Likewise, the overexpression or deletion of
BTN1 had opposing effects on the ability of Sed5 to assemble into multiple SNARE complexes () as well as to maintain Golgi morphology ( and Tables S3 and S4). Importantly, Btn1 regulates the phosphorylation state of Sed5, which was shown to control retrograde protein trafficking from the Golgi as well as Golgi morphology (
Weinberger et al., 2005). In the absence of
BTN1, Sed5 is in an underphosphorylated state (, , and S5 A) that mimics the NP form and results in an enhancement of Golgi clustering ( and Table S3) and an increase in SNARE assembly (). In contrast,
BTN1 overexpression mimicked the constitutively P form of Sed5 by dispersing Golgi clusters (e.g., those formed by Sed5
317A; and Table S3), reducing SNARE assembly (), and inhibiting the growth of cells bearing mutant SNAREs involved in Golgi trafficking (Fig. S2). Finally,
BTN1 overexpression may even enhance Sed5 modification slightly (). Thus, it appears that Btn1 regulates Sed5 phosphorylation and, therefore, function. Importantly, we noted that the deletion of
BTN2 also had effects on Sed5 phosphorylation and Golgi morphology (Fig. S5); however, these could result from the mislocalization of Btn1 that occurs in
btn2Δ cells ().
Because Btn1 is not a kinase, it must be indirectly involved in Sed5 phosphorylation. Two pieces of evidence suggested that Yck3 might be involved. First, mammalian CLN3 was suggested to function as a palmitoyl protein desaturase (
Narayan et al., 2006,
2008). Second, Yck3 is a palmitoylated endosome- and vacuole-associated casein kinase involved in protein sorting to the vacuole (
Sun et al., 2004;
LaGrassa and Ungermann, 2005). Moreover, although Yck3 shares essential functions with a paralog, Hrr25 (
Wang et al., 1996), and is able to suppress deletions in homologues that function primarily at the plasma membrane (e.g., Yck1 and Yck2;
Sun et al., 2004), it also phosphorylates proteins involved in vacuole protein transport, such as Vps41 and Vam3 (
LaGrassa and Ungermann, 2005;
Brett et al., 2008). We examined Sed5 phosphorylation in cells expressing an inducible form of
YCK3 and found that this t-SNARE was underphosphorylated after the turn-off of expression (, right). Thus, Yck3 is a candidate kinase for Sed5 phosphorylation. Moreover, the deletion of
YCK3 resulted in strong defects in LE–Golgi sorting (), which parallel those seen in
btn1Δ and
btn2Δ cells ( and Tables S1 and S2). This strengthens the idea that Yck3 is involved with Btn1 function, although Sed5 may not be the only substrate involved in the regulation of LE–Golgi sorting. A model for the control of Sed5 and LE–Golgi sorting by Btn1 and Yck3 is shown in .
How Btn1 actually regulates Yck3 function is unclear; however, it might occur via regulation of the lipid anchor moiety. This conjecture is supported by the fact that substitution of the palmitate acceptor region in Yck3 with a TMD allows yeast to bypass the Btn1 requirement in LE–Golgi sorting ( and Table S5) and partially restores Sed5 phosphorylation (). Yck3 palmitoylation and membrane anchoring are required for normal vacuolar fusion (
Hou et al., 2009) as well as its function in LE–Golgi sorting, the latter being indicated by the fact that Yif1 and Kex2 are missorted in cells lacking five of the DHHC class of palmitoyl transferases ( and Tables S2 and S5) and that Sed5 is underphosphorylated therein (). Although we have not proven whether Btn1 (or CLN3) is a palmitoyl protein desaturase, it does show that modulation of the palmitate anchor could play an important role in kinase function in yeast and, potentially, could form the basis for disease onset in postmitotic cells (e.g., neurons) lacking an inherent ability to either control or turn over palmitoylated proteins in a proper fashion. In this regard, it is highly interesting and probably not coincidental that the infantile form of NCL occurs as a result of mutation in a lysosomal palmitoyl thioesterase, although the target substrates for this enzyme have yet to be identified (
Vesa et al., 1995;
Mole et al., 2005;
Siintola et al., 2006;
Getty and Pearce, 2011). If, as in yeast, mammalian CLN3 controls a secretory kinase, screens for regulators of kinase function may identify therapeutic agents of benefit to Batten disease patients.