PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cmrPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalCMR ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Clin Microbiol Rev. Oct 2011; 24(4): 655–681.
PMCID: PMC3194829
Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas' Disease in the United States
Caryn Bern,1* Sonia Kjos,2 Michael J. Yabsley,3 and Susan P. Montgomery1
1Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
2Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin
3Department of Population Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd. N.E., Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 718-4726. Fax: (404) 718-4816. E-mail: cxb9/at/cdc.gov.
Summary: Chagas' disease is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and causes potentially life-threatening disease of the heart and gastrointestinal tract. The southern half of the United States contains enzootic cycles of T. cruzi, involving 11 recognized triatomine vector species. The greatest vector diversity and density occur in the western United States, where woodrats are the most common reservoir; other rodents, raccoons, skunks, and coyotes are also infected with T. cruzi. In the eastern United States, the prevalence of T. cruzi is highest in raccoons, opossums, armadillos, and skunks. A total of 7 autochthonous vector-borne human infections have been reported in Texas, California, Tennessee, and Louisiana; many others are thought to go unrecognized. Nevertheless, most T. cruzi-infected individuals in the United States are immigrants from areas of endemicity in Latin America. Seven transfusion-associated and 6 organ donor-derived T. cruzi infections have been documented in the United States and Canada. As improved control of vector- and blood-borne T. cruzi transmission decreases the burden in countries where the disease is historically endemic and imported Chagas' disease is increasingly recognized outside Latin America, the United States can play an important role in addressing the altered epidemiology of Chagas' disease in the 21st century.
Chagas' disease is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (234). World Health Organization disease burden estimates place Chagas' disease first among parasitic diseases in the Americas, accounting for nearly 5 times as many disability-adjusted life years lost as malaria (343). An estimated 8 million people are currently infected, and 20 to 30% of these will develop symptomatic, potentially life-threatening Chagas' disease (Table 1) (214). T. cruzi is carried in the guts of hematophagous triatomine bugs; transmission occurs when infected bug feces contaminate the bite site or intact mucous membranes. T. cruzi can also be transmitted through transfusion, through transplant, and congenitally (177, 234).
Table 1.
Table 1.
Countries where Chagas' disease is endemic and estimates of the seroprevalence and number of infected inhabitants
Historically, transmission and morbidity were concentrated in rural areas of Latin America where poor housing conditions favor vector infestation. However, in the last several decades, successful vector control programs have substantially decreased transmission in rural areas, and migration has brought infected individuals to cities both within and outside Latin America (87, 111, 196). Since 1991, several subregional initiatives have made major advances in decreasing vector infestation in human dwellings and extending screening of the blood supply for T. cruzi (87, 269). In 2007, control efforts in Latin America were formally joined by an initiative to address the “globalization” of Chagas' disease, recognizing the increasing presence of imported cases in Europe, North America, and Japan and the potential for local transmission through nonvectorial routes (344). The United States occupies an ambiguous position in this new initiative. While the United States has never participated in Latin American Chagas' disease control programs, it cannot be classified as an area where the disease is “not endemic” in the same sense as Europe or Japan. The southern tier of states from Georgia to California contains established enzootic cycles of T. cruzi, involving several triatomine vector species and mammalian hosts such as raccoons, opossums, and domestic dogs (26, 151, 345). Nevertheless, most T. cruzi-infected individuals in the United States are immigrants from areas of endemicity in Latin America (29).
This article will present an overview of clinical and epidemiological aspects of Chagas' disease, with a focus on data and issues specific to T. cruzi and Chagas' disease in the United States. Topics to be covered include vector biology and ecology, animal reservoirs, T. cruzi strain typing, human Chagas' disease, and future research needed for control of Chagas' disease in the United States.
Life Cycle
Nearly all the salient features of the T. cruzi life cycle were described by Carlos Chagas, the scientist who discovered the organism, in 1909 (62). T. cruzi is a kinetoplastid protozoan which infects vertebrate and invertebrate hosts during defined stages in its life cycle (234, 292). The triatomine vector ingests circulating trypomastigotes when it takes a blood meal from an infected mammalian host. In the midgut of the vector, trypomastigotes transform through an intermediate form sometimes called a spheromastigote to epimastigotes, the main replicating stage in the invertebrate host. Epimastigotes migrate to the hindgut and differentiate into infective metacyclic trypomastigotes, which are excreted with the feces of the vector. Metacyclic trypomastigotes enter through the bite wound or intact mucous membrane of the mammalian host and invade many types of nucleated cells through a lysosome-mediated mechanism (50). In the cytoplasm, trypomastigotes differentiate into the intracellular amastigote form, which replicates with a doubling time of about 12 h over a period of 4 to 5 days. At the end of this period, the amastigotes transform into trypomastigotes, the host cell ruptures, and the trypomastigotes are released into the circulation. The circulating parasites can then invade new cells and initiate new replicative cycles, and they are available to infect vectors that feed on the host. In the absence of successful antitrypanosomal treatment, the infection lasts for the lifetime of the mammalian host.
Transmission Routes
Vector-borne transmission.
The vector-borne transmission route, occurring exclusively in the Americas, is still the predominant mechanism for new human infections. The feces of infected bugs contain metacyclic trypomastigotes that can enter the human body through the bite wound or through intact conjunctiva or other mucous membranes.
Congenital transmission.
Between 1 and 10% of infants of T. cruzi-infected mothers are born with congenital Chagas' disease (14, 24, 289). Congenital transmission can occur from women themselves infected congenitally, perpetuating the disease in the absence of the vector (263). Factors reported to increase risk include higher maternal parasitemia level, less robust anti-T. cruzi immune responses, younger maternal age, HIV and, in an animal model, parasite strain (9, 32, 34, 107, 289).
Blood-borne transmission.
Transfusional T. cruzi transmission was postulated in 1936 and first documented in 1952 (109, 307). The risk of T. cruzi transmission per infected unit transfused is estimated to be 10 to 25%; platelet transfusions are thought to pose a higher risk than other components such as packed red cells (31, 308). In 1991, the prevalence of T. cruzi infection in donated blood units ranged from 1 to 60% in Latin American cities (268). Since then, blood donation screening has become accepted as an important pillar of the Chagas' disease control initiatives (220, 269). Serological screening of blood components for T. cruzi is now compulsory in all but one of the countries in Latin America where the disease is endemic, and the prevalence of infection in screened donors has decreased substantially (196, 269). Nevertheless, Chagas' disease screening coverage by country was estimated to vary from 25% to 100% in 2002, and the risk of transmission, though much decreased, has not been eliminated (269). The residual risk in Latin America where screening has been implemented is estimated to be 1:200,000 units (269, 308).
Organ-derived transmission.
Uninfected recipients who receive an organ from a T. cruzi-infected donor may develop acute T. cruzi infection. However, transmission is not universal; in a series of 16 uninfected recipients of kidneys from infected donors, only 3 (19%) acquired T. cruzi infection (238). Nineteen instances of transmission by organ transplantation have been documented in the literature (13 kidney, 1 kidney and pancreas, 3 liver, and 2 heart transplants) (16, 61, 66, 79, 99, 101, 157, 238, 279). The risk from heart transplantation is thought to be higher than that from kidney or liver transplantation (65). One case of transmission through unrelated cord blood transplantation has been reported (104).
Oral transmission.
Recently, increasing attention has focused on the oral route of T. cruzi transmission; several outbreaks attributed to contaminated fruit or sugar cane juice have been reported from Brazil and Venezuela (28, 82, 208). Most outbreaks are small, often affecting family groups in the Amazon region, where the palm fruit açaí is a dietary staple that appears to be particularly vulnerable to contamination, perhaps from infected vectors living in the trees themselves (74, 208). The largest reported outbreak to date led to more than 100 infections among students and staff at a school in Caracas; locally prepared guava juice was implicated (82).
Background
The epidemiology of vector-borne T. cruzi is closely linked to the biological and ecological characteristics of local vectors and mammalian reservoir hosts. Triatomines of both sexes must take blood meals to develop through their nymphal stages to adults, and females require a blood meal to lay eggs. Thus, nymphs and adults of either sex may be infected with T. cruzi, but infection rates increase with increasing vector stage and age. Most domestic triatomine species feed nocturnally and are able to complete their blood meal without waking the host (169). The major Latin American vectors defecate during or immediately after taking a blood meal.
T. cruzi infection is transmitted to wild mammals by sylvatic triatomine species; these bugs often colonize the nests of rodent or marsupial reservoir hosts (169, 311). Sylvatic triatomine adults may fly into human dwellings because of attraction by light and cause sporadic human infections (74). Domestic transmission cycles occur where vectors have become adapted to living in human dwellings and nearby animal enclosures; domestic mammals such as dogs, cats, and guinea pigs play important roles as triatomine blood meal sources and T. cruzi reservoir hosts (69, 124, 131). Some triatomine species can infest both domestic and sylvatic sites and may play a bridging role (192).
There are more than 130 triatomine species in the Americas, many of which can be infected by and transmit T. cruzi (169, 311). However, a small number of highly domiciliated vectors are of disproportionate importance in the human epidemiology of disease (Table 2) (311). The domestic environment provides abundant blood meal sources, and poor quality housing with adobe or unfinished brick walls provides crevices and other diurnal hiding places for triatomines (170, 201). Thatch roofs provide an attractive habitat for some species (117). In communities where the disease is endemic, 25 to 100% of houses may be infested, and a house and its immediate surroundings may support large colonies of juvenile and adult bugs (170, 201, 230).
Table 2.
Table 2.
The major triatomine species that colonize the domestic and peridomestic environment and play an important role in the epidemiology of Chagas' disease in Latin Americaa
In areas of the Amazon where deforestation and human immigration have occurred, tree-dwelling sylvatic triatomine populations have survived and rebounded by adapting to new vertebrate host species (2). These opportunistic vertebrates (opossums and rodents) are competent Chagas' disease reservoirs and are acclimated to living in close proximity to humans where remnant vegetation is located. The concentration of triatomines and vertebrate reservoirs in the peridomestic realm has lead to increased interactions between sylvatic triatomine species and humans in deforested areas of the Amazon and Panama and to an apparent increase in the incidence of Chagas' disease in humans (4, 244).
Triatomine Distribution in the United States
Eleven species of triatomine bugs have been reported from the United States: Triatoma gerstaeckeri, T. incrassata, T. indictiva, T. lecticularia, T. neotomae, T. protracta, T. recurva, T. rubida, T. rubrofasciata, T. sanguisuga, and Paratriatoma hirsuta (Fig. 1 and Table 3). Triatomines are present across the southern half of the country, distributed from the Pacific to Atlantic coasts (Fig. 2). One species (T. rubrofasciata) is found in Hawaii. A high degree of polymorphism has been noted in several species across their geographic ranges, particularly T. protracta, T. rubida, and T. sanguisuga, resulting in proposed subspecies classifications (249, 251, 254, 296). However, due to the recognition of morphological intermediates across some subspecies groups and the absence of supporting data (e.g., paired molecular and morphological studies), these subspecies have not been universally accepted as valid taxonomic groups (110, 169).
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Photographs of U.S. triatomine species, Triatoma and Paratriatoma. The image size relative to the scale bar represents the average length of each species. Photographs for T. incrassata, T. recurva, and P. hirsuta were unavailable. All photographs are (more ...)
Table 3.
Table 3.
Geographic location, Trypanosoma cruzi prevalence, human interaction, and sites of collection of Triatoma and Paratriatoma species in the United States
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Triatomine species diversity in the continental United States and Hawaii by county. States shaded gray have reported at least one species. The states of Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania have each reported one species but with (more ...)
All U.S. species except T. rubrofasciata and T. sanguisuga have been collected in Mexico; the distribution of T. sanguisuga likely extends into northeastern Mexico as well (255). A review of the published literature from 1939 to 2010 resulted in reports of wild-caught triatomine bugs from 262 counties in 28 states. The greatest species diversity occurs in the southwest, particularly Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. More specifically, high species diversity is concentrated in south-central Arizona and southwestern Texas, where up to five species have been recorded in a single county (Fig. 2). T. cruzi-infected specimens have been reported from 10 states, predominantly from counties in the Southwest (Fig. 3A). All species except T. incrassata and P. hirsuta have been found naturally infected with T. cruzi (Fig. 3B to L).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Triatomine species geographic distribution by state (gray areas) and county and Trypanosoma cruzi infection status by county in the continental United States and Hawaii. (A) All species; (B) Triatoma gerstaeckeri; (C) T. incrassata; (D) T. indictiva; (more ...)
County-level maps (Fig. 2 and and3)3) reflect in part where collection efforts have been focused over the past 70 years. There is no evidence of a temporal or spatial trend in the published reports to suggest any recent migration of species into or within the United States. The county maps do not necessarily reflect triatomine population densities or provide a complete representation of their distributions. Rather, the maps more likely provide an indication of where the bugs have been considered a pest to humans or animals and where field efforts were concentrated as a consequence or where specimens were collected coincidentally by researchers studying other animal systems (i.e., reports based on museum specimens). Collection records are more comprehensive in the southwestern states and Florida, with sparse records in the southeastern states. Early discovery of the association of U.S. triatomine bugs with Neotoma species of woodrats may have aided field research in the southwestern states, because woodrat species in this region build easily identifiable, above-ground dens. The absence of records in some areas of the southeastern United States may reflect a paucity of field studies or published records in those locations rather than being an indication of true absence of the bug. The detection of T. cruzi-infected wild mammals in many of these areas suggests the presence of the vectors. Additionally, recent efforts to model the geographic distribution of U.S. species based on the land cover, climate, and host composition of known collection sites indicate favorable habitat suitability in many of these unsurveyed or underreported regions (26, 137, 158, 259). Characteristics of each species are summarized in Table 3 and described in detail in the sections that follow.
Description of U.S. Triatomine Species
Triatoma gerstaeckeri (Stål).
T. gerstaeckeri is one of the most frequently collected and tested species in the United States; 57.7% (1,038/1,800) of tested specimens were found to harbor T. cruzi. T. cruzi-infected specimens have been found in both Texas and New Mexico and in the majority of the counties where testing has been reported (Fig. 3B). Published reports from the 1930s to 1960s describe T. gerstaeckeri as a pest species of humans and livestock; the adult bugs were frequent invaders of rural houses in Texas, and reports of humans being bitten were common (217, 330, 332). Human encounters have been less frequently reported in recent decades (49, 151). Infected T. gerstaeckeri specimens were recently recovered from the residence of a child with acute Chagas' disease in southern Texas (151). In northeastern Mexico, this species is considered an important Chagas' disease vector due to its close association with human dwellings (184, 288). U.S. T. gerstaeckeri data derive predominantly from Texas, where the bug has been found in a wide variety of habitats. The species was collected from a rock squirrel burrow in a cave in the southeastern corner of New Mexico (341).
Triatoma incrassata Usinger.
T. incrassata is somewhat similar to T. protracta in size and general appearance of legs and head, but it has a distinctive abdominal margin which is largely yellow on the dorsal surface and entirely yellow on the ventral surface. It has been collected at lights in the two southern Arizona counties of Santa Cruz and Pima (Fig. 3C) (169, 255). The major mammalian hosts and T. cruzi infection prevalence for this species are unknown.
Triatoma indictiva Neiva.
T. indictiva was considered a subspecies of T. sanguisuga in the past but is currently accorded full species status (110, 169, 296). This species is very similar in appearance to T. sanguisuga, with the exception of the uniformly black pronotum and narrower horizontal markings on the abdominal edge. The distributions of the two species overlap in the central regions of Texas, with T. indictiva continuing further west to Arizona and T. sanguisuga continuing east to the Atlantic coast (Fig. 3D and K). Reported collection of T. indictiva is much less frequent than that of T. sanguisuga. Additional collection sites for T. indictiva in New Mexico and Arizona were provided in a map by Lent and Wygodzinsky in 1979, but specific location designations were not given (169). Specimens were collected from woodrat nests in New Mexico and at lights in Texas (229, 332). T. indictiva has been found naturally infected with T. cruzi in specimens from Texas (151, 229).
Triatoma lecticularia (Stål).
T. lecticularia has a geographic distribution similar to that of T. sanguisuga, from the south-central United States east to the Atlantic coast (Fig. 3E). Its range probably includes Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama based on similarities in ecological characteristics between these states and adjacent areas where it has been reported. Specimens of T. lecticularia from New Mexico have been reported, but specific location information was not provided (254, 296). T. lecticularia had been variously classified as a subspecies of as well as synonymized with T. sanguisuga prior to Usinger's 1944 reclassification (296). Therefore, early reports of T. lecticularia and T. sanguisuga may be difficult to confirm without reviewing the actual specimens. Ryckman in 1984 contended that reports of T. lecticularia from Arizona and California are erroneous, presumably based on earlier taxonomic confusion and contemporary knowledge of the species distribution (254). T. lecticularia can be distinguished from T. sanguisuga and T. indictiva based on its shorter, domed head and uniform covering of all body surfaces with dark hairs. T. lecticularia has been collected from houses, dog kennels, woodrat nests, and rock squirrel burrows in hollow logs in Texas, from houses in South Carolina, and at lights in Missouri (151, 195, 256, 312, 345). In early reports, this species was described as a nuisance species, commonly found in well-constructed homes of central Texas (218). In 1940, Packchanian conducted experimental inoculation of the gut contents of a T. cruzi-infected T. lecticularia bug into the eye of a human subject in order to demonstrate the infectivity of a T. cruzi strain from Texas (216). Localized symptoms, fever, lymphadenopathy, and trypomastigotes visualized on blood films confirmed infection in this individual. The high T. cruzi infection prevalence (144/282; 51%) in T. lecticularia was derived primarily from specimens collected from woodrat nests in Texas (282, 332).
Triatoma neotomae Neiva.
In the United States, T. neotomae is known only from Texas, primarily the southern tip (Fig. 3F). The inclusion of other states in its range by some authors is most likely an error, as published records of T. neotomae outside Texas or northeastern Mexico could not be found. This species is similar in size to T. protracta but with distinctive yellow markings around the abdominal margin and basal half of wings, a glossy body surface, and a ventrally flattened abdomen. Also like T. protracta, this species is closely associated with Neotoma spp. of woodrats, for which it was named. It has been found almost exclusively in woodrat nests throughout its range, with a single report from a dog kennel in Cameron County, TX (151). The small sample size limits interpretation of this species' high cumulative T. cruzi infection prevalence (40/53; 76%); however, this is likely related to the high infection levels reported among woodrats in this region (49, 93, 219).
Triatoma protracta (Uhler).
T. cruzi was first reported in the United States from a T. protracta specimen collected in 1916 in a woodrat nest in San Diego County, CA (155). T. cruzi testing data are most abundant for this species, with an overall prevalence of 17.5% (723/4,124). Infected specimens have been reported from four of seven states across its range: California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas (Fig. 3G). T. protracta is closely associated with western woodrat species and is commonly found in nests throughout the bug's geographic distribution. Large aggregations of T. protracta were reported from roadbeds in southern California in an area where woodrat nests were removed as a consequence of highway construction (340). Attracted by lights, the displaced bugs frequently entered houses in the area and became a source of annoyance for residents. T. protracta has also been reported as frequently entering houses in other areas of California, New Mexico, and Arizona (187, 273, 304, 332, 336). First reported as a pest of humans in Yosemite Valley, CA, in the 1860s, T. protracta continues to be an important cause of severe allergic reactions in humans who are bitten (152, 198). This species was implicated in a human case of Chagas' disease in north-central California (203).
Triatoma recurva (Stål).
T. recurva naturally infected with T. cruzi has been found in the southern half of Arizona (Fig. 3H). A single report of T. recurva collected in western Texas has not been confirmed or replicated (138, 151). Early reports describe T. recurva as a pest of humans, primarily in the Alvardo Mine area of Yavapai County, AZ, where it was a common invader of houses and tents of mining employees (332, 336). Recent reports describe home invasions and hypersensitivity reactions due to bites that occurred in and around houses in Pima and Cochise Counties, AZ (152, 237). Although the species has been collected occasionally from woodrat nests, the woodrat is not considered the primary host of T. recurva (96, 255, 321). The preferred host for this species is unknown, but it has been observed in association with rodents, particularly rock squirrels, and feeds on reptiles and guinea pigs in laboratory settings (96, 255, 324, 334, 336). T. recurva is the largest of the U.S. species (average length, 29 mm) and has relatively hairless body surfaces, including the first two segments of the mouthparts. It is brown to black in appearance, with slender, long legs and head and an orange-yellow abdominal margin. Its body size, head and leg characteristics, and uniformly colored pronotum distinguish this species from others in its range.
Triatoma rubida (Uhler).
In the United States, T. rubida has been found from western Texas to southern California; T. cruzi-positive specimens have been reported from Arizona and Texas (Fig. 3I). The cumulative infection prevalence in the published literature is low (96/1,340; 7.2%). However, in a recent study, the gut contents of 65 (41%) of 158 T. rubida specimens collected in and around houses in Pima County, AZ, yielded positive results by T. cruzi PCR (237). Despite the presence of nymphal stages inside houses in this study, the authors remarked that the numbers were too low to conclude that colonization was established. In contrast, a study from Sonora, Mexico, reported that 68% of houses were colonized by T. rubida, suggesting that this species was domesticated in that region (221). Both the U.S. and Mexican study areas had experienced disruption of previously undisturbed environments considered suitable habitats for both triatomine and T. cruzi vertebrate hosts. Human bite encounters, including hypersensitivity reactions due to T. rubida, continue to be a public health issue in Arizona (152, 226, 237). This species has been frequently collected from woodrat nests throughout its range (96, 256, 321, 332, 336). It can be distinguished morphologically from other species in its range by the first antennal segment, which reaches or surpasses the tip of the head.
Triatoma rubrofasciata (DeGeer).
Described in 1733, T. rubrofasciata was the first species classified in the Triatominae subfamily and is the current type species for the Triatoma genus (270). It is the only triatomine species found in both the Eastern and Western Hemispheres and is frequently found in port cities in close association with the roof rat (Rattus rattus) (255). Molecular and morphometric data support the hypothesis that Old World triatomine species derive from T. rubrofasciata carried from North America with rats on sailing ships during the colonial period (136, 223, 270). In the United States, this species has been collected from houses in Florida and Hawaii and in chicken and pigeon coops and cat houses in Hawaii. Specimens have been reported from Jacksonville, FL, and Honolulu, HI (Fig. 3J) (296, 337). Wood (in 1946) reported 2 specimens collected from Honolulu to be infected with T. cruzi based on morphological and motility characteristics (337). Allergic reactions to T. rubrofasciata bites have been reported in humans from Hawaii (12).
Triatoma sanguisuga (Leconte).
T. sanguisuga is one of the most widely distributed species in the United States, with its range spanning from Texas and Oklahoma eastward to the Atlantic coast (Fig. 3K). This species has been reported in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and Kentucky, but without specific location data (169, 254, 296). Although published records are lacking, its range probably includes West Virginia. Reports of T. sanguisuga from states west of Texas were likely mistaken due to taxonomic reclassification (see “Triatoma indictiva Neiva” above). In every state where testing has been conducted, T. cruzi-infected T. sanguisuga has been found, including Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, and Florida. It has been collected from diverse natural settings across its range, in association with many different vertebrate hosts, including woodrats, cottonrats, armadillos, raccoons, opossums, frogs, dogs, chickens, horses, and humans (120, 150, 212, 215, 332, 348). Human annoyance and allergic reactions to T. sanguisuga bites were reported as early as the mid-1800s in Georgia, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Florida and recently in Louisiana (116, 147, 152, 161, 215). This species was found inside the residences of human Chagas' disease patients in Tennessee and Louisiana and in the vicinity of the home of a T. cruzi-seropositive blood donor in Mississippi (54, 90, 134).
Paratriatoma hirsuta Barber.
P. hirsuta is known from the western United States, collected from arid regions of California, Nevada, and Arizona (Fig. 3L). Although it has been demonstrated to be a competent vector of T. cruzi in experimental settings, a naturally infected specimen has yet to be reported (321). It has been most frequently collected from woodrat nests in its range but has also been found in houses and other human dwellings in Yavapai County, AZ, and Riverside County, CA, and at lights in Palm Springs, CA (251, 296, 336). Ryckman (in 1981) described this species as having important public health significance due to allergic reactions caused by its bite (252). This is one of the smallest U.S. triatomine species (average length, 13 mm) and can be distinguished from T. protracta, which is similar in size and geographic distribution, by a pervasive covering of dark hairs on all body surfaces.
Human-Vector Interactions and T. cruzi Transmission Potential in the United States
Eight of the 11 species have been associated with human bites, and seven have been implicated in allergic reactions (Table 3). Allergic reactions occur in response to antigens delivered in the vector saliva during blood feeding and are unrelated to the T. cruzi infection status of the bug. Most allergic reactions are localized at the bite site, characterized by a large welt and intense itching (315). Severe reactions are generally systemic and may involve angiodema, urticaria, difficulty breathing, nausea, diarrhea, and/or anaphylaxis (152, 226). Although allergic reactions to triatomine bites have been reported from states throughout the southern United States, the incidence is highest in the southwestern states, with T. protracta and T. rubida most frequently implicated (106, 152, 204, 226, 237). The most common scenario involves invasion of an adult bug into a human dwelling, where it bites a sleeping individual.
Contemporary encounters between humans and triatomine bugs in the United States are often associated with destruction or invasion of vertebrate host habitats, compromised housing structures, or both. Disruption of host burrows (as described above for T. protracta) provokes the bugs to seek new refuges, and their innate attraction to lights often leads them to nearby human dwellings. Most triatomine species show flexibility in host and habitat requirements, which allows them to adapt to changing environments. A host preference for some species has been difficult to establish due to association with multiple vertebrate habitats and the ability of the insects to mature and reproduce successfully on multiple host species in laboratory settings. Although mammals are the only vertebrate reservoirs for T. cruzi, many triatomine species utilize other animal groups as blood hosts, including reptiles and amphibians (T. gerstaeckeri, T. protracta, T. recurva, T. rubida, and T. sanguisuga) and birds (T. gerstaeckeri and T. sanguisuga) (169, 228, 253, 338). A recent blood meal analysis study of Texas field specimens provides evidence of a broad host range for T. gerstaeckeri and T. sanguisuga. The DNAs from nine vertebrate species (woodrat, dog, cat, cow, pig, raccoon, skunk, armadillo, and human) were detected in T. gerstaeckeri gut specimens, and DNAs from three species (dog, avian, and human) were detected in T. sanguisuga gut specimens (149).
Because vector colonization of houses in the United States is rare, the risk of vector-borne transmission to humans is considered to be quite low. With the exception of the 2006 Louisiana case in which the residence was found to harbor triatomine colonies, vector-borne transmission to humans in the United States has been attributed to adult bugs invading houses (90, 134, 203). Expansion of human settlements into environments that support an active sylvatic disease cycle could result in an increase in adult invaders and, potentially, colonization events. Colonization of houses by triatomines is an important factor in vector-borne transmission because it increases the probability of encounters between humans and potentially infected vectors.
In addition to adaptability to domestic structures, triatomine feeding and defecation behaviors are important risk factors for vector-borne transmission and vary across species. The timing and placement of defecation after feeding greatly influence the risk of transmission via fecal contamination of the host bite site or other exposed tissues. A small number of studies have reported on these characteristics in U.S. species. In 1951 Wood reported the following average postfeeding defecation times (minutes) for the adults of four U.S. species: T. protracta, 30.6 (n = 10); T. rubida, 1.6 (n = 5); T. recurva, 75.7 (n = 3); and P. hirusta, 35.0 (n = 2) (327). In a similar study in 2007 using both nymphs and adults of three Mexican species (also present in the United States), Martinez-Ibarra et al. reported the following results: T. protracta, 6.7 (n = 475); T. lecticularia, 8.3 (n = 368); and T. gerstaeckeri, 11.5 (n = 733) (183). Likewise, Zeledon et al. (1970) reported the following results for nymphs and adults of three Latin American species: R. prolixus, 3.2 (n = 210); T. infestans, 3.5 (n = 210); and T. dimidiata, 11.3 (n = 210) (352). In 1970 Pippin reported the proportion of bugs defecating within 2 min postfeeding for adults of two U.S. and one Latin American species: R. prolixus, 74.6% (n = 169); T. gerstaeckeri 19.4% (n = 160); and T. sanguisuga 16.9% (n = 136) (228). Similarly, in 2009 Klotz et al. reported the proportion of bugs defecating before or directly after feeding for adults of two U.S. species: T. rubida, 45% (n = 40); and T. protracta, 19.4% (n = 31) (153). In that study, it was noted that none of the bugs of either species defecated on the host during the experiment. Although direct comparisons across studies is problematic due to variation in methods and conditions (e.g., temperature, blood host, and feeding apparatus), it appears that U.S. species in general exhibit greater postfeeding defecation delays than important Latin American vector species. Delayed defecation and a low frequency of domestic colonization contribute to a low probability of autochthonous U.S. human infection due to vector-borne transmission, which is the primary route of infection in areas of hyperendemicity in Latin America.
Background
Concurrent with the demonstration of T. cruzi in the first recognized human patient, Carlos Chagas observed the parasite in the blood of a domestic cat in the same household (62). Subsequently, Chagas went on to demonstrate T. cruzi in armadillos and primates, confirming the role of wildlife as reservoirs (63, 64). To date, over 100 mammalian species have been reported as natural hosts for T. cruzi, and all mammals are considered to be susceptible to infection. Birds are refractory to infection due to complement-mediated lysis and macrophage-induced killing of the parasites (146, 188). Although T. cruzi has a wide host range, the epidemiologically important reservoirs vary by geographic region due to the biology and ecology of the mammals and vectors and how these interactions translate to risk of human exposure. Opossums and armadillos are important reservoirs throughout the Americas, a finding consistent with genetic data suggesting that these two groups are the ancestral hosts for the two major ancestral lineages of T. cruzi (112, 349).
Transmission routes for wildlife and domestic animal species are similar to those for humans. Sylvatic animals become infected during feeding activity of vectors present in their burrows, dens, or temporary shelters. As in humans, infection occurs when bug feces containing the parasites enters a wound or mucous membrane. In addition, the insectivorous behavior of many animals (e.g., woodrats) increases the likelihood of infection via the ingestion of infected bugs (78, 241, 250). Transplacental transmission has been documented in laboratory mice and rats (15, 81, 127). Although not proven to occur in wildlife, this route likely contributes to maintenance of the parasite in the sylvatic cycle as well. Ingestion of infected meat was once considered a possible route of transmission, but a recent study with raccoons suggests that this is probably uncommon (241).
Wildlife Reservoirs of T. cruzi in the United States
In the United States, natural T. cruzi infection was first reported in the big-eared woodrat Neotoma macrotis (syn. N. fuscepes macrotis) in California (316). In the 1940s, natural infections were reported from house mice, southern plains woodrats (N. micropus), nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus), and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana) in Texas and from brush mice (Peromyscus boylii rowleyi) and woodrats (N. albigula) in Arizona (219, 321). Early experimental infection trials with parasites from these hosts and Triatoma spp. indicated that laboratory rats, laboratory mice, guinea pigs, domestic dogs, rhesus macaques, opossums (D. virginiana), six species of Peromyscus, and four species of woodrats were susceptible (77, 154, 215, 217, 316, 321). In addition, an isolate from a naturally infected Triatoma species from Texas was shown to be infectious to a human (216). Subsequent surveys in the 1950s and 1960s documented infections in raccoons (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossums, striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) in the southeastern United States (185, 212, 305).
Currently, at least 24 species are recognized as natural wildlife hosts for T. cruzi in the United States (Table 4 ). Reported T. cruzi infection rates vary widely by host species and geographic area. However, the observed variation may be due in part to the use of different diagnostic assays with very different sensitivities. As in humans, the majority of infected animals are in the chronic phase of the infection; therefore, serological testing is more sensitive than methods that rely on detection of parasites (346). However, unlike serological tests, visualization of the parasites allows the examiner to distinguish T. cruzi from other Trypanosoma species (e.g., T. neotomae, T. kansasensis, T. peromysci, and T. lewisi-like sp.) reported from rodents based on morphology (186, 207, 294, 317, 328; M. J. Yabsley, unpublished data). If serology is used for screening, infections should be confirmed with a T. cruzi-specific assay. Some PCR assays will amplify other Trypanosoma and/or Leishmania species, and more specific methods may be necessary to confirm the infection as T. cruzi.
Table 4.
Table 4.
Hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi in the United Statesa
The primary reservoirs and transmission dynamics of T. cruzi differ between the eastern and western regions of the United States. The greatest vector diversity and density occur in the western United States (Fig. 2), where many triatomine species live in the nests of woodrats. In this region, woodrats are the most common reservoir; however, infection has also been demonstrated in other rodents, raccoons, skunks, and coyotes (Table 4; Fig. 4A and B). Rodents other than woodrats utilize habitats similar to those of woodrats (old woodrat nests, small caves, and holes in rock walls) where triatomines are found, while coyotes, raccoons, skunks, and opossums likely become infected when bugs feed on them in their dens or through ingestion of bugs. In the eastern United States, the prevalence of T. cruzi is highest in raccoons, opossums, armadillos, and skunks (Table 4; Fig. 4A and B). There are several woodrat species in the eastern United States, but densities are much lower than for woodrat species in the western United States, and nests are less evident because they utilize burrows instead of large above-ground constructed nests. Little is known about the prevalence of T. cruzi in eastern woodrat species. To date, only one survey for T. cruzi has been conducted, and none of 23 Neotoma floridana animals in Kansas were positive (294). Reports of wildlife infections are shown at the county level (when possible) in Fig. 4A and B.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Reports of natural Trypanosoma cruzi infection in U.S. mammals. (A) Raccoons, Virginia opossums, and ringtails; infection of opossums has been reported in Virginia, but no locality was specified. (B) Rodents and mesomammals. An additional report of infected (more ...)
Domestic and Exotic Animal Infections in the United States
In addition to indigenous wildlife reservoirs, domestic and exotic animals can become infected if they are present in an enzootic area and come in contact with infected bugs. Transmission routes are similar to those for wildlife, with ingestion of bugs likely being an important route.
Canine Chagas' disease.
In Central and South America, domestic dogs are important reservoirs in the domestic cycle and can be used as sentinels for local transmission (123). A similar cycle has been recognized in the United States, but the importance of domestic dogs as T. cruzi infection reservoirs is not as well understood (26). T. cruzi infection in domestic dogs has been reported widely throughout the southern United States since 1972 (Fig. 4C) (18, 20, 23, 41, 105, 134, 150, 189, 205, 206, 239, 274, 287, 298, 312). Infection has been documented in at least 48 different breeds in the United States, with the sporting and working breeds accounting for the majority of cases, presumably due to greater exposure to infected vectors and mammalian tissues (150, 246). As in humans, transplacental transmission is also an important mode of transmission in dogs (23, 58). Domestic dogs can develop both acute and chronic disease similar to that in humans. Acute illness, particularly mortality, has been reported more frequently in very young dogs (<1 year old) and generally involves myocarditis and cardiac arrhythmias (150). Dogs that survive infection at a very young age or acquire infection as adults generally experience a chronic course of disease that may progress to significant cardiac dysfunction, typically involving cardiac dilatation, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, and clinical signs related to right-sided or bilateral cardiac failure (21, 22). In a recent seroprevalence study in Tennessee, older dogs (ages 6 to 10 years) were more likely to be infected (246), which is similar to results of studies in Latin America that reported increasing seropositivity with increasing age (97, 122). Dogs with clinically apparent infections are managed with appropriate supportive therapy. Chemotherapeutic agents developed for treatment of human Chagas' disease (benznidazole and nifurtimox) have shown some efficacy in dogs (121, 125), but they are not currently approved for veterinary use in the United States.
Primates and other exotic animals.
Any mammals kept in areas where bugs may enter are at risk of acquiring T. cruzi infection. Because U.S. animal use guidelines require that nonhuman primates be housed in facilities with access to the outdoors, they may be at particular risk of acquiring T. cruzi infection. Exotic animals that acquire T. cruzi infection may be asymptomatic or may develop symptomatic, even lethal, clinical disease. Severe disease may be due to a large parasite inoculum from exposure to or ingestion of a large number of infected bugs but may also reflect variation in susceptibility of animal species to clinical Chagas' disease. Mortality due to locally acquired T. cruzi infection has occurred in groups of captive animals in the United States, including baboons (Papio hamadryas), rhesus macaques, crab-eating macaques (M. fascicularis), Celebes black macaques (M. nigra), sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps), and a hedgehog (Atelerix albiventris) (8, 115, 145, 213, 313). Asymptomatic T. cruzi infection has been reported in lion-tailed macaques (M. silenus), pigtailed macaques (M. nemestrina), rhesus macaques, baboons, ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), and black and white ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) in the United States (11, 128, 145, 232, 264).
General Molecular Epidemiology
T. cruzi is a genetically heterogeneous species that also has wide variability in biological and biochemical characteristics (51, 174, 191, 192). The most common historical classification divided T. cruzi into two major groups, TcI and TcII; TcII was further divided into five subgroups (also called discrete typing units) designated TcIIa to TcIIe (51, 193, 309). Recently, a consensus was reached that the six major recognized lineages will be renamed TcI to TcVI; compared to the earlier system, TcI remained TcI, TcIIb became TcII, TcIIc became TcIII, TcIIa became TcIV, TcIId became TcV, and TcIIe became TcVI (353). For the purposes of this review, data from earlier studies that genotyped isolates as TcII (without a to d subtyping) will be referred to as “historic TcII” to differentiate these types from the current TcII, which is equivalent to the historic TcIIb lineage. The TcI and TcII lineages are considered ancestral, whereas the TcV and TcVI lineages are the products of at least two hybridization events (309, 353). The origins of TcIII and TcIV are as yet unresolved (353). Whereas some investigators consider TcIII to represent a third ancestral strain (80), others consider it to be the result of hybridization between TcI and TcII (309, 310). TcI and TcII to TcVI are estimated to have diverged between 88 and 37 million years ago (43, 175). Currently, T. cruzi genotypes are classified based on size polymorphism or sequence analysis of several gene loci, including the miniexon gene, the intergenic region of the miniexon gene, the 18S rRNA gene, the 24Sα rRNA gene, internal transcribed spacer regions, and numerous housekeeping genes (171, 310).
The TcI lineage is found throughout the Americas in both domestic and sylvatic cycles and is believed to have evolved with arboreal Didelphimorpha (opossums) and vectors in the triatomine tribe Rhodniini (112). In all parts of the Americas, Didelphis spp. are common reservoirs for this lineage, although natural infection with TcI has been reported in a wide range of mammals. TcI is the only lineage reported from humans in North and Central America and the predominant lineage reported in human Chagas' disease in areas of South America north of the Amazon Basin (40, 139, 239, 258).
Although TcI has long been recognized as genetically diverse, subtyping has not been widely conducted until very recently, and no generally accepted typing system or nomenclature currently exists. Additionally, many isolates have been examined only by sequencing of a single locus. Haplotypes were first recognized following sequence analysis of the intergenic regions of the miniexon genes of 12 isolates from Columbia (132). Based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions, and deletions, four haplotypes, TcIa to TcId, were proposed. Haplotypes TcIa and TcIc were associated with humans and domiciliated vectors. Haplotypes TcIb and TcId were found in specimens from one human, opossums, and sylvatic vectors; TcId was found exclusively in sylvatic samples (132). Interestingly, phylogenetic analysis of the same gene region of 20 TcI strains from the United States, Mexico, Bolivia, Brazil, Columbia, and Argentina showed that Didelphis sp. isolates grouped separately from other isolates (210). A fifth haplotype (TcIe) was recently detected in a human and a sylvatic vector (Mepraia spinolai) from Chile and in one domestic vector (T. infestans) from Argentina (76). Multilocus microsatellite profiling of 135 TcI isolates provided better discrimination and increased levels of variability among TcI sylvatic strains (173). However, in contrast to previous studies in which opossums were found to be infected with a particular haplotype (210), no host association was noted. The authors suggest that the ecological niche might be more important for parasite evolution and diversification than reservoir host species (173). Wider use of multilocus typing methods may provide further insight into TcI genetic diversity in the future.
Lineage TcIII (historical TcIIc) is believed to have evolved with terrestrial burrowing edentates, specifically armadillos, and bugs in the triatomine tribe Triatomini (112, 349). Edentates and marsupials were the first mammal inhabitants of South America (~65 million years ago), whereas rodents, primates, and bats arrived in South America ~25 million years ago (112). Upon arrival, these mammals became hosts to the various lineages of T. cruzi. TcIII is found throughout South America and is rare in domestic cycles but common in sylvatic cycles (172, 349). The primary hosts for TcIII are several different species of armadillos, primarily D. novemcinctus. Additionally, TcIII has been reported from limited numbers of a terrestrial marsupial (Monodelphis domestica), rodents, and skunks (349).
TcII, TcV, and TcVI (historic IIb, IId, and IIe, respectively) are the lineages most commonly reported in human Chagas' disease in southern South America (193). All three lineages are closely associated with the domestic transmission cycle and the domestic vector Triatoma infestans. TcV and TcVI have been reported in cardiomyopathy and intestinal megasyndromes in the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, and Brazil) (57, 193). In contrast, intestinal Chagas' disease is rare in northern South America, Central America, and Mexico, where TcI is the predominant lineage (191). TcV is the lineage reported most frequently in infants with congenital infection, although this may simply reflect its predominance in Bolivia and Argentina, where these studies have been conducted (72, 303). The two hybrid lineages, TcV and TcVI, are hypothesized to have evolved in armadillos (181, 349). A single isolation of TcII (historic TcIIb) was reported from Euphractus sexcinctus (six-banded armadillo) in Paraguay, but its original mammalian host has not been established (193, 349).
Currently, the TcIV (historic IIa) lineage is poorly understood. Studies of several gene targets indicate that TcIV strains from North and South America are genetically distinct and group separately in phylogenetic analyses (181; D. M. Roellig and M. J. Yabsley, unpublished data). In South America, TcIV is found in a wide range of mammals, including primates, rodents, armadillos, and terrestrial marsupials (349). In North America, the raccoon is the principal host for TcIV; infections have been reported in domestic dogs, striped skunks, armadillos, and primates (239).
Interestingly, two terrestrial marsupial genera (Philander and Monodelphis) can harbor both TcI and several other genotypes, whereas only TcI has been reported from the arboreal genus Didelphis (163, 225, 240). The genus Philander also displays a more severe inflammatory response to T. cruzi (162, 163). Experimental inoculation of Monodelphis domestica with TcI, TcII, and TcVI strains resulted in infections, but a North American TcIV isolate failed to establish an infection (242). Collectively, these data suggest that the marsupial genera diverged before the establishment of host relationships with T. cruzi and that utilization of different ecological niches resulted in distinct T. cruzi lineage transmission patterns (163).
T. cruzi Genotypes in the United States
In the United States, only two genotypes (TcI and TcIV) have been reported from mammals and vectors (Table 5). Consistent with the findings in South American studies of Didelphis, TcI is the only genotype reported from D. virginiana, the Virginia opossum (17, 68, 239). In raccoons, TcIV predominates, but TcI has been detected in a small number of specimens. Both TcI and TcIV have been reported from nine-banded armadillos, domestic dogs, and rhesus macaques (68, 239). Lineage TcIV has been reported from a limited number of ring-tailed lemurs and a striped skunk (239). Although the majority of isolates from placental mammals in the United States have been TcIV, all five typed isolates from human autochthonous infection were TcI (239). Both TcI and TcIV have been reported from Triatoma spp. from Georgia, Florida, and Texas.
Table 5.
Table 5.
Genotypes of U.S. T. cruzi isolates
Acute T. cruzi Infection
The incubation period following vector-borne T. cruzi exposure is 1 to 2 weeks, after which the acute phase begins (234). The acute phase lasts 8 to 12 weeks and is characterized by circulating trypomastigotes detectable by microscopy of fresh blood or buffy coat smears. Most patients are asymptomatic or have mild, nonspecific symptoms such as fever and therefore do not come to clinical attention during the acute phase. In some patients, acute infection is associated with inflammation and swelling at the site of inoculation, known as a chagoma. Chagomas typically occur on the face or extremities; parasites may be demonstrated in the lesion. Inoculation via the conjunctiva leads to the characteristic unilateral swelling of the upper and lower eyelids known as the Romaña sign (234). Severe acute disease occurs in fewer than 1% of patients; manifestations include acute myocarditis, pericardial effusion, and/or meningoencephalitis (3, 177). Children younger than 2 years appear to be at higher risk of severe manifestations than older individuals. Severe acute Chagas' disease carries a substantial risk of mortality.
Orally transmitted T. cruzi infection appears to be associated with more severe acute morbidity and higher mortality than vector-borne infection (28, 271). For example, 75% of 103 infected individuals in the Caracas outbreak were symptomatic, 59% had ECG abnormalities, 20% were hospitalized, and there was one death from acute myocarditis (82). Recent laboratory data suggest that parasite contact with host gastric acid may render trypomastigotes more invasive through changes in parasite surface glycoproteins and that this interaction may underlie the increased clinical severity seen in orally acquired Chagas' disease (75, 350).
Congenital T. cruzi Infection
Most infected newborns are asymptomatic or have subtle findings, but a minority present with severe life-threatening disease (32, 289). The manifestations of symptomatic congenital Chagas' disease can include low birth weight, prematurity, low Apgar scores, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia, and thrombocytopenia (35, 36, 177, 289). Severely affected neonates may have meningoencephalitis, gastrointestinal megasyndromes, anasarca, pneumonitis, and/or respiratory distress (3537, 289). Mortality among infected infants is significantly higher than in uninfected infants, ranging from <5% to 20% in published studies (34, 289). However, even severe congenital Chagas' disease may not be recognized because signs are often nonspecific or because the diagnosis is not considered (289).
Chronic T. cruzi Infection
Eight to 12 weeks after infection, parasitemia levels become undetectable by microscopy, and in the absence of effective etiological treatment, the individual passes into the chronic phase of T. cruzi infection. Despite the absence of microscopically detectable parasites in the peripheral blood, persons with chronic T. cruzi infection maintain the potential to transmit the parasite to the vector and directly to other humans through blood components, through organ donation, and congenitally (177, 311).
Indeterminate form of chronic T. cruzi infection.
Persons with chronic T. cruzi infection but without signs or symptoms of Chagas' disease are considered to have the indeterminate form. The strict definition of the indeterminate form requires positive anti-T. cruzi serology, with no symptoms or physical examination abnormalities, normal 12-lead ECG, and normal radiological examination of the chest, esophagus, and colon (194). Current baseline evaluation guidelines in the United States recommend only a history, physical examination, and ECG (30). Further cardiac evaluation is recommended only if cardiac signs or symptoms are present, and barium studies are recommended only in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (30). An estimated 20 to 30% of people who initially have the indeterminate form of Chagas' disease progress over a period of years to decades to clinically evident cardiac and/or gastrointestinal disease (234).
Cardiac Chagas' disease.
Chagas' cardiomyopathy is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process that involves all chambers, damage to the conduction system, and often an apical aneurysm. The pathogenesis is hypothesized to involve parasite persistence in cardiac tissue and immune-mediated myocardial injury (182). The earliest manifestations are usually conduction system abnormalities, most frequently right-bundle branch block or left anterior fascicular block, and segmental left ventricular wall motion abnormalities (178). Later manifestations include complex ventricular extrasystoles and nonsustained and sustained ventricular tachycardia, sinus node dysfunction that may lead to severe bradycardia, high-degree heart block, apical aneurysm usually in the left ventricle, thromboembolic phenomena due to thrombus formation in the dilated left ventricle or aneurysm, and progressive dilated cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure (233). These abnormalities lead to palpitations, presyncope, syncope, and a high risk of sudden death (235, 236).
Digestive Chagas' disease.
Gastrointestinal involvement is less common than Chagas' heart disease. This form is seen predominantly in patients infected in the countries of the Southern Cone (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Southern Peru, Uruguay, and parts of Brazil) and is rare in northern South America, Central America, and Mexico. This geographical pattern is thought to be linked to differences in the predominant T. cruzi genotypes (51, 192). Gastrointestinal Chagas' disease usually affects the esophagus and/or colon, resulting from damage to intramural neurons (83, 84, 199). The effects on the esophagus span a spectrum from asymptomatic motility disorders through mild achalasia to severe megaesophagus (83). Symptoms include dysphagia, odynophagia, esophageal reflux, weight loss, aspiration, cough, and regurgitation. As in idiopathic achalasia, the risk of esophageal carcinoma is elevated (13, 47). Megacolon is characterized by prolonged constipation and may give rise to fecaloma, volvulus, and bowel ischemia.
T. cruzi Infection in the Immunocompromised Host
Acute T. cruzi infection in organ transplantation recipients.
Acute T. cruzi infection in organ recipients has several features that differ from those of acute T. cruzi infection in immunocompetent hosts. The incubation period can be prolonged: among the 15 patients for whom data were available in published reports, the mean time from transplantation to onset of symptoms of acute T. cruzi infection was 112 days (range, 23 to 420 days) (61, 66, 79, 99, 101, 157, 238, 279). A relatively severe clinical spectrum has been reported, with manifestations that included fever, malaise, anorexia, hepatosplenomegaly, acute myocarditis, and decreased cardiac function; two of the 18 reported patients presented with fulminant myocarditis and congestive heart failure (61, 279).
Reactivation of chronic T. cruzi infection in organ recipients.
Patients with chronic T. cruzi infection can be candidates for organ transplants. In a large cohort of heart transplant patients, survival of those who received the transplant because of chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy was longer than survival among those with idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy, and T. cruzi reactivation was a rare cause of death (33, 38, 39). Reactivation should be considered in the differential diagnosis of febrile episodes and apparent rejection crises. In addition to fever and acute Chagas' myocarditis in the transplanted heart, common manifestations of reactivation disease include inflammatory panniculitis and skin nodules (52, 102, 238). Central nervous system (CNS) involvement has been reported but is a much less frequent manifestation of reactivation among transplant recipients than in AIDS patients (5, 102, 180).
Reactivation Chagas' disease in HIV/AIDS patients.
Reactivation of T. cruzi infection in HIV/AIDS patients can cause severe clinical disease with a high risk of mortality. However, as in organ transplant recipients, reactivation is not universal, even in those with low CD4+ lymphocyte counts. The only published prospective cohort study followed 53 HIV-T. cruzi-coinfected patients in Brazil for 1 to 190 months; 11 (21%) had T. cruzi reactivation diagnosed based on symptoms and/or microscopically detectable parasitemia (260). Even among patients without clinical reactivation, the level of parasitemia is higher among HIV-coinfected than among HIV-negative patients (261). Symptomatic T. cruzi reactivation in AIDS patients is most commonly reported to cause meningoencephalitis and/or T. cruzi brain abscesses; the presentation may be confused with CNS toxoplasmosis and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of mass lesions on imaging or CNS syndromes in AIDS patients (70, 71, 88, 260). The second most commonly reported sign of reactivation is acute myocarditis, sometimes superimposed on preexisting chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy (260, 297). Patients may present with new arrhythmias, pericardial effusions, acute cardiac decompensation, or accelerated progression of existing chronic heart disease (100, 260). Acute meningoencephalitis and myocarditis can occur simultaneously. In the Brazilian cohort, cardiac reactivation was as frequent as CNS disease; cardiac manifestations of reactivated Chagas' disease may pass undetected or mimic progression of chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy (260). Less common manifestations of reactivation in HIV/AIDS patients include skin lesions, erythema nodosum, and parasitic invasion of the peritoneum, stomach, or intestine (100, 261).
Appropriate diagnostic testing for T. cruzi infection varies depending on the phase of the disease and the status of the patient. In the United States, CDC provides consultation to health care providers concerning Chagas' disease diagnostic testing (contact information is listed in “Antitrypanosomal Drugs” below).
Diagnosis of Acute T. cruzi Infection
In the acute phase, motile trypomastigotes can be detected by microscopy of fresh preparations of anticoagulated blood or buffy coat (311). Parasites may also be visualized by microscopy of blood smears stained with Giemsa stain or other stains. Hemoculture in one of several types of standard parasitic medium (e.g., Novy-MacNeal-Nicolle) is relatively sensitive during the acute phase but requires 2 to 4 weeks to show replication. The level of parasitemia decreases within 90 days of infection, even without treatment, and becomes undetectable by microscopy in the chronic phase (306, 311). PCR is a sensitive diagnostic tool in the acute phase of Chagas' disease and may also be used to monitor for acute T. cruzi infection in the recipient of an infected organ or after accidental exposure (133, 134, 157).
Diagnosis of Congenital T. cruzi Infection
Early in life, congenital Chagas' disease is an acute T. cruzi infection and similar diagnostic methods are employed. Concentration methods yield better sensitivity than direct examination of fresh blood. The microhematocrit method is the most widely used technique in Latin American health facilities. Fresh cord or neonatal blood is collected, sealed in four to six heparinized microhematocrit tubes, and centrifuged, and the buffy coat layer is examined by light microscopy (108). Parasitemia levels rise after birth and peak at or after 30 days of life (32). Repeated sampling on several occasions during the first months of life increases the sensitivity but may not be acceptable to parents (14, 32, 197). Hemoculture can increase sensitivity, but the technique is not widely available, and results are not available for 2 to 4 weeks.
Molecular techniques have higher sensitivity and detect congenital infections earlier in life than the microhematocrit method (32, 92, 247). Transient detection of parasite DNA has occasionally been reported in specimens from infants who subsequently are found to be uninfected (32, 211). For this reason, a positive PCR on samples collected on two separate occasions may be used as a criterion for confirmation of congenital infection (32). PCR is increasingly used for the early diagnosis of congenital Chagas' disease in Latin America and is the method of choice in industrialized countries (55, 140, 202, 247, 266).
For infants not diagnosed at birth, conventional IgG serology (as outlined below for chronic T. cruzi infection) is recommended after 9 months of age, when transferred maternal antibody has disappeared and the congenital infection has passed into the chronic phase (32, 55, 56).
Diagnosis of Chronic T. cruzi infection
Diagnosis of chronic infection relies on serological methods to detect IgG antibodies to T. cruzi, most commonly the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescent-antibody assay (IFA). No single assay has sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be relied on alone; two serological tests based on different antigens (e.g., whole parasite lysate and recombinant antigens) and/or techniques (e.g., ELISA, IFA, and immunoblotting) are used in parallel to increase the accuracy of the diagnosis (311).
Inevitably, a proportion of individuals tested by two assays will have discordant serological results and need further testing to resolve their infection status. Specimens with positive results but low antibody titers are more likely to show discordance because results obtained by less sensitive tests may be negative. Published data suggest that the sensitivity of serological assays varies by geographical location, possibly due to T. cruzi strain differences and the resulting antibody responses (275, 293, 299). The status of some individuals remains difficult to resolve even after a third test, because there is no true gold standard assay for chronic T. cruzi infection (283). Assays such as the radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) and trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigen immunoblot (TESA-blot) are promoted as reference tests, but even these do not have perfect sensitivity and specificity and may not be capable of resolving the diagnosis (168, 272).
Options for diagnostic T. cruzi serological testing are relatively limited in the United States. Several ELISA kits based on parasite lysate or recombinant antigens are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared for diagnostic application. Use of an assay with validation data (e.g., a commercial kit shown to have acceptable sensitivity and specificity in a thorough study) is preferable to reliance on in-house tests for which no performance data are available (31).
Utility of PCR for Diagnosis or Monitoring
PCR techniques provide the most sensitive tool to diagnose acute-phase and early congenital Chagas' disease and to monitor for acute T. cruzi infection in the recipient of an infected organ or after accidental exposure (32, 65, 133). PCR assays usually show positive results days to weeks before circulating trypomastigotes are detectable on peripheral blood smears (267). Quantitative PCR assays (e.g., real-time PCR) are useful to monitor for reactivation in the immunosuppressed T. cruzi-infected host. In these patients, a positive result on conventional PCR does not prove reactivation, but quantitative PCR assays that indicate rising parasite numbers over time provide the earliest and most sensitive indicator of reactivation (89, 92).
In chronic T. cruzi infection, PCR is used as a research tool but is not generally a useful diagnostic test. Although PCR results will be positive for a proportion of patients, the sensitivity is highly variable depending on the characteristics of the population tested, as well as the PCR primers and methods (25, 142, 314). For these reasons, negative results by PCR do not constitute evidence for lack of infection.
Antitrypanosomal Drugs
Nifurtimox and benznidazole are the only drugs with proven efficacy against Chagas' disease (73, 177). Neither drug is approved by the U.S. FDA, but both can be obtained from the CDC and used under investigational protocols. Consultations and drug requests should be addressed to the Parasitic Diseases Public Inquiries line [(404) 718-4745; e-mail, parasites@cdc.gov], the CDC Drug Service [(404) 639-3670], and, for emergencies after business hours and on weekends and federal holidays, the CDC Emergency Operations Center [(770) 488-7100].
Nifurtimox (Lampit, Bayer 2502), a nitrofuran, interferes with T. cruzi carbohydrate metabolism by inhibiting pyruvic acid synthesis. Gastrointestinal side effects are common, occurring in 30 to 70% of patients. These include anorexia leading to weight loss, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. Neurological toxicity is also fairly common, including irritability, insomnia, disorientation, and, less often, tremors. Rare but more serious side effects include paresthesias, polyneuropathy, and peripheral neuritis. The peripheral neuropathy is dose dependent, appears late in the course of therapy, and should prompt interruption of treatment. Higher doses are often used in infants than in older children, and tolerance is better in children than in adults.
Benznidazole (Rochagon, Roche 7-1051) is a nitroimidazole derivative, considered more trypanocidal than nifurtimox. Dermatological side effects are frequent, and consist of rashes due to photosensitization, rarely progressing to exfoliative dermatitis. Severe or exfoliative dermatitis or dermatitis associated with fever and lymphadenopathy should prompt immediate cessation of the drug. The peripheral neuropathy is dose dependent, usually occurs late in the course of therapy, and is an indication for immediate cessation of treatment; it is nearly always reversible but may take months to resolve. Bone marrow suppression is rare and should prompt immediate interruption of drug treatment. Patients should be monitored for dermatological side effects beginning 9 to 10 days after initiation of treatment. Benznidazole was well tolerated in two placebo-controlled trials with children (12% had a rash and <5% had gastrointestinal symptoms in one study; <10% had moderate reversible side effects in the other study) (7, 277). Side effects are more common in adults than in children.
Treatment of Acute and Congenital T. cruzi infection
In acute and early congenital Chagas' disease, both drugs reduce the severity of symptoms, shorten the clinical course, and reduce the duration of detectable parasitemia (53, 306). The earliest trials of antitrypanosomal drugs were conducted with patients with acute Chagas' disease in the 1960s and 1970s using nifurtimox (53, 306). Serological cure was documented at the 12-month follow-up in 81% of those treated in the acute phase (306).
Treatment of Chronic T. cruzi Infection
Until recently, only the acute phase, including early congenital infection, was thought to be responsive to antiparasitic therapy. However, in the 1990s, 2 placebo-controlled trials of benznidazole treatment in children with chronic T. cruzi infection demonstrated approximately 60% cure as measured by conversion to negative serology 3 to 4 years after the end of treatment (7, 278). Several follow-up studies suggest that the earlier in life that children are treated, the higher the rate of reversion to negative serology (6, 281). Together with growing clinical experience across Latin America, these studies revolutionized management of children with Chagas' disease, making early diagnosis and antitrypanosomal drug therapy the standard of care throughout the region (177, 311).
There is currently a growing movement to offer treatment to older patients and those with early cardiomyopathy (30, 302, 311). In Latin America, most Chagas' disease experts now believe that the majority of patients with chronic T. cruzi infection should be offered treatment, employing individual exclusion criteria such as an upper age limit of 50 or 55 years and the presence of advanced irreversible cardiomyopathy (276). This change in standards of practice is based in part on nonrandomized, nonblinded longitudinal studies that demonstrate decreased progression of Chagas' cardiomyopathy and decreased mortality in adult patients treated with benznidazole (301, 302). A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of benznidazole for patients with mild to moderate Chagas' cardiomyopathy is under way and will help to clarify treatment efficacy for this group (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00123916).
Management of the Immunocompromised Host
Antitrypanosomal treatment for reactivation in organ transplant recipients follows standard dosage regimens and promotes resolution of clinical symptoms and parasitemia. There are no data to indicate that prior treatment or posttransplant prophylaxis decreases the risk of reactivation; posttransplant prophylaxis is not routinely administered in heart transplant centers in Latin America (52). Antitrypanosomal therapy is thought to achieve a sterile cure in few, if any, adults with longstanding chronic infection, and treated patients should be considered to be at risk for reactivation. Reactivation in an HIV-coinfected patient should be treated with standard courses of antitrypanosomal treatment; antiretroviral therapy should be optimized (143).
Since 1991, the estimated global prevalence of T. cruzi infection has fallen from 18 million to 8 million, due to intensive vector control and blood bank screening (87, 214). The Pan American Health Organization estimates that approximately 60,000 new T. cruzi infections occur each year (214). As other transmission routes have diminished, the proportion attributable to congenital infection has grown: an estimated 26% of incident infections now occur through mother-to-child transmission (214).
In settings with endemic vector-borne transmission, T. cruzi infection is usually acquired in childhood. Because the infection is lifelong, the seroprevalence in an area with sustained vector-borne transmission rises with age, reflecting the cumulative incidence (98). Before widespread vector control was instituted in the early 1990s, it was common to find that >60% of adults in an community where the disease was endemic were infected with T. cruzi (200, 230). In cross-sectional community surveys, most infected individuals are asymptomatic; an estimated 70 to 80% will remain asymptomatic throughout their lives (176, 234). Because cardiac and gastrointestinal manifestations usually begin in early adulthood and progress over a period of years to decades, the prevalence of clinical disease increases with increasing age (178).
Autochthonous Transmission to Humans
Seven autochthonous vector-borne infections (four in Texas and one each in California, Tennessee, and Louisiana) have been reported since 1955 (Table 6) (10, 90, 134, 151, 209, 265, 342). Most reported cases have been in infants or small children; six of the seven infections were in the acute phase at the time of identification, and the diagnosis was sought because of symptoms and/or the presence of triatomine vectors. A survey conducted in the community of residence of the 1982 California case demonstrated positive complement fixation results in 6/241 (2.5%) residents tested (203). The rarity of autochthonous vector-borne transmission in the United States is assumed to result from better housing conditions that minimize vector-human contact. In addition, North American vectors may have lower transmission efficiency, due at least in part to delayed defecation (153, 203, 228). However, given that the vast majority of acute T. cruzi infections in immunocompetent individuals pass undiagnosed in Latin America, where the index of suspicion is much higher, undetected cases of autochthonous vector-borne transmission are presumed to occur.
Table 6.
Table 6.
Autochthonous human cases of Chagas' disease in the United States
Chagas' Disease Burden among Latin American Immigrants
The only direct assessments in Latin American populations living in the United States come from very limited local surveys and blood bank screening (see below) (42, 59, 148, 165, 167). No large representative surveys have ever been conducted, and blood bank data cannot be extrapolated with validity because donors are not representative of the larger population. The only recent data come from a survey of Latin American immigrants attending churches in Los Angeles County; a total of 10 (1%) of 985 adults tested had positive results by serological testing (290). Based on the reported number of immigrants from countries in Latin America where Chagas' disease is endemic and the estimated national T. cruzi seroprevalences in their countries of origin, there are an estimated 300,000 persons with T. cruzi infection currently living in the United States (29). Patients with clinical manifestations of Chagas' disease, especially cardiomyopathy, are assumed to be present but largely unrecognized in hospitals and health care facilities in the United States, but systematic data are sparse (126). Recent targeted studies in a Los Angeles hospital demonstrated positive results by T. cruzi serological tests among 15 (16%) of 93 Latin American patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic cardiomyopathy and 11 (4.6%) of 239 patients with conduction system abnormalities on ECG and at least 1 year of residence in Latin America (190, 291).
Blood-Borne Transmission and Blood Donor Screening
A total of 5 transfusion-associated T. cruzi infections have been documented in the United States since the late 1980s (Table 7) (59, 67, 114, 166, 351). All infected recipients had underlying malignancies and were immunosuppressed. Platelet units from Bolivian donors were implicated in 3 of 5 cases. Several patients had severe manifestations of Chagas' disease, including acute myocarditis, acute atrioventricular block, severe congestive heart failure, pericarditis with T. cruzi in the pericardial fluid, and possible meningoencephalitis (67, 114, 351). The recipient of a platelet unit detected as infected during a research study had T. cruzi infection detected by PCR and serology during prospective monitoring but never developed symptoms (166).
Table 7.
Table 7.
Transfusion-related cases of Chagas' disease in the United States
In December 2006, the FDA approved an ELISA to screen for antibodies to T. cruzi in donated blood (59). The radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) has been used as the confirmatory test (1, 31, 257). The American Red Cross and Blood Systems Inc. voluntarily began screening all blood donations in January 2007, and in subsequent months, many other blood centers starting screening as well. As of 2 September 2011, 1,459 confirmed seropositive donations have been detected in 43 states, with the largest numbers found in California, Florida, and Texas (1). A second T. cruzi antibody screening test was approved in April 2010. In December 2010, FDA issued specific guidance for appropriate use of the screening tests (103). Current FDA recommendations are to screen all blood donors initially, and if a donor's sample tests negative using one of the two FDA-approved screening tests, no testing of future donations by that donor is necessary. No supplemental test has been approved, and donors are deferred indefinitely on the basis of positive screening test results alone. This strategy will be reviewed by FDA at upcoming meetings of the Blood Products Advisory Committee; the risk of newly acquired blood donor infections, including results from longitudinal studies of repeat blood donors, will be considered. Screening of blood donations remains voluntary, although most blood centers are currently following FDA recommendations.
In data from the first 16 months of screening, comprising >14 million blood donations, the overall seroprevalence was 1:27,500 based on donations screened, with the highest rates in Florida (1:3,800), followed by California (1:8,300) (31). Because large blood donor studies prior to FDA approval of the screening ELISA were conducted in southern California with permanent deferral of all repeatedly reactive donors, a substantial number of infected individuals were already removed from the local donor pool, and the reported prevalence in California is thought to represent an underestimate (42, 59, 165, 167). From preliminary data, 29 (28%) of 104 T. cruzi-infected donors were born in Mexico, 27 (26%) in the United States, 17 (16%) in El Salvador, and 11 (11%) in Bolivia; the remaining 20 donors were born in 9 other countries of Central and South America (31). Among confirmed infected donors born in the United States, 10 individuals reported no specific risk factors for T. cruzi infection. All of these donors reported outdoor activities (e.g., hunting, camping, or extensive gardening) in the southern United States, which may indicate potential autochthonous exposure to the vector or animal reservoirs.
Organ Donor-Derived Transmission and Organ Donor Screening
A total of five instances of organ-derived transmission from three donors are documented in the published literature in the United States (Table 8) (60, 61, 157). Four of the five recipients died. One patient died from acute Chagas' myocarditis; T. cruzi infection was not the primary cause of but may have contributed to the other deaths (61, 157). In all of these instances of transmission, donor infections were not suspected until at least one recipient presented with symptomatic acute Chagas' disease (60, 61, 157).
Table 8.
Table 8.
Published reports of organ transplant-derived cases of Chagas' disease in the United Statesa
More recently, some organ procurement organizations have begun selective or universal screening of donated organs (65). Three transmission events (in two heart recipients in 2006 and 2010 and one liver recipient in 2006) were detected through systematic laboratory monitoring when their respective donors were identified as infected shortly after the transplants occurred. All three of these recipients were treated and survived their T. cruzi infection (65; S. Huprikar and B. Kubak, unpublished data).
When an infected organ donor is detected, recipient monitoring relies primarily on detection of the parasite by microscopy, culture, and/or PCR, because seroconversion may be delayed or never occur in immunocompromised individuals (65, 238). Molecular techniques usually show positive results days to weeks before circulating trypomastigotes are visible by microscopy of peripheral blood. Transplant-transmitted T. cruzi infection may have a longer incubation period than vector-borne infection; parasitemia is usually detected within 2 to 3 months, but the delay can be as long as 6 months. A frequently recommended monitoring schedule consists of weekly specimens for 2 months, specimens every 2 weeks up to 4 months, and then monthly specimens afterwards (65, 238). In the absence of other indications and assuming no evidence of infection has been detected, the monitoring interval can be lengthened after 6 months posttransplantation.
Unanswered Questions and Priorities for Research and Programs
The United States faces important public health challenges for the prevention, control, and management of T. cruzi infection and Chagas' disease (86). Patients with undiagnosed Chagas' cardiomyopathy go unrecognized, impeding their optimal management. The large number of undetected T. cruzi infections sustains the risk of transmission through blood and organ donation and from mother to child. Currently, obstetricians have limited knowledge of congenital T. cruzi transmission risk, and almost no screening of at-risk women is carried out (48). Many health care providers in all specialties fail to consider the diagnosis of Chagas' disease in patients at risk and are unaware that antitrypanosomal treatment is available (280, 300); the possibility that treatment could decrease the risk of progression of disease in infected individuals is therefore not realized.
Worldwide, programs to control Chagas' disease are hampered by the lack of adequate tools, and these challenges are equally salient in the United States (283). Point-of-care diagnostic tests would allow physicians to make a rapid diagnosis in patients in whom Chagas' disease is suspected and provide a practical means to identify women at risk of transmitting the infection to their infants. However, the sensitivity of current T. cruzi rapid tests shows wide geographic variation (275, 299); there is a need for screening tests with high sensitivity, especially for T. cruzi infections originating in geographic areas such as Mexico and the United States, where current tests appear to have low sensitivity (275; CDC, unpublished data). Two other diagnostic needs are critical: a practical, timely test of cure and indicators to distinguish patients who are likely to develop clinical disease from those likely to remain asymptomatic. Unfortunately, neither of these tools is currently on the horizon. Pediatric formulations of existing drugs are of immediate concern and expected to be available soon (91). However, new treatment drugs with high efficacy and better safety profiles, especially in adults, are needed (295).
To inform effective policy for Chagas' disease control in the United States, significant gaps in our knowledge must also be addressed. Systematic, rigorous population-based data to determine infection prevalence and morbidity are needed to inform prevention strategies. Pilot studies in hospitals with a high proportion of women born in Latin America would help to define practical methods to target screening for congenital transmission. More thorough identification of the T. cruzi strains circulating in the United States will add to our assessment of transfusion risk and understanding of the molecular epidemiology of the disease (164). More comprehensive assessment of the magnitude of local transmission risk and the factors influencing vector and reservoir host distribution and human contact are important to inform control efforts. Improved knowledge of the local epidemiology and ecology will allow more efficient, effective targeting of limited resources and raise awareness of Chagas' disease in the United States. As improved control of vector- and blood-borne T. cruzi transmission decreases the burden in countries where the disease is historically endemic and imported Chagas' disease is increasingly recognized outside Latin America, the United States—which confronts the challenges faced both by countries where the disease is endemic and by those where it is not—can play an important role in addressing the altered epidemiology of Chagas' disease in the 21st century.
Biographies
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zcm9990923610005.gif Caryn Bern is a medical epidemiologist in the Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, CDC. She holds an M.D. from Stanford University School of Medicine and an M.P.H. from the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health and is board certified in internal medicine. She joined CDC as an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer in 1990 and has worked in the Division of Parasitic Diseases since 1996. She holds adjunct appointments in the Emory Rollins School of Public Health and Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health and teaches tropical medicine courses at Johns Hopkins, the University of Minnesota, and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Dr. Bern's current research is focused on the treatment, immunology, epidemiology, and control of Chagas' disease and leishmaniasis.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zcm9990923610006.gif Sonia Kjos is currently a Project Scientist in the Epidemiology Center at the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation in Marshfield, WI. She holds an M.S. in epidemiology from The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, and a Ph.D. in medical and veterinary entomology from Texas A&M University, College Station, where she also completed a certification program in geographic information systems. Dr. Kjos spent 2 years in the Division of Parasitic Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA, as an American Society for Microbiology postdoctoral fellow. Her research focus has been on the ecoepidemiology of peridomestic Chagas' disease transmission in the United States, particularly the characteristics of the insect vectors and role of domestic animals as disease reservoirs.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zcm9990923610007.gif Michael J. Yabsley is currently an Associate Professor of Wildlife Disease Ecology at the University of Georgia. He has an M.S. in zoology (parasitology) from Clemson University and a Ph.D. in infectious diseases from the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Georgia. Dr. Yabsley teaches several courses in veterinary parasitology and principles of wildlife diseases at the undergraduate, graduate, and veterinary student levels and mentors undergraduate, M.S., and Ph.D. students interested in various aspects of wildlife disease ecology. He has an active research program that principally investigates the role of wildlife as reservoirs or hosts for zoonotic and/or vector-borne pathogens. Since 1997, Dr. Yabsley has been studying the natural history of T. cruzi in the United States. He is an active member of the American Society of Parasitologists, the Southeastern Society of Parasitologists, and the Wildlife Disease Association. He is the author or coauthor of 112 peer-reviewed publications.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zcm9990923610008.gif Susan P. Montgomery is currently the Team Lead for the Epidemiology Team in the Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, CDC. She has a D.V.M. from New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, and an M.P.H. from the Harvard School of Public Health. After 15 years in private veterinary medical practice, she joined CDC as an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer in 2002 with the Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases and was a staff epidemiologist with the Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch before joining the Division of Parasitic Diseases in 2005. Her current research activities focus on Chagas' disease epidemiology in the United States, schistosomiasis epidemiology and control, neglected infections associated with poverty in the United States, and parasitic disease blood and organ transplantation safety.
1. AABB Chagas Biovigilance Network 2011, posting date Reports through 04/18/2011. http://www.aabb.org/programs/biovigilance/Pages/chagas.aspx.
2. Abad-Franch F., Monteiro F. A. 2007. Biogeography and evolution of Amazonian triatomines (Heteroptera: Reduviidae): implications for Chagas disease surveillance in humid forest ecoregions. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 102(Suppl. 1):57–70. [PubMed]
3. Acquatella H. 2007. Echocardiography in Chagas heart disease. Circulation 115:1124–1131. [PubMed]
4. Aguilar H. M., Abad-Franch F., Dias J. C., Junqueira A. C., Coura J. R. 2007. Chagas disease in the Amazon region. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 102(Suppl. 1):47–56. [PubMed]
5. Altclas J., et al. 2005. Chagas disease in bone marrow transplantation: an approach to preemptive therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant. 36:123–129. [PubMed]
6. Andrade A. L., et al. 2004. Benznidazole efficacy among Trypanosoma cruzi-infected adolescents after a six-year follow-up. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 71:594–597. [PubMed]
7. Andrade A. L., et al. 1996. Randomised trial of efficacy of benznidazole in treatment of early Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Lancet 348:1407–1413. [PubMed]
8. Andrade M. C., et al. 2009. Nonspecific lymphocytic myocarditis in baboons is associated with Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81:235–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Andrade S. G. 1982. The influence of the strain of Trypanosoma cruzi in placental infections in mice. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76:123–128. [PubMed]
10. Anonymous 1956. Found: two cases of Chagas disease. Texas Health Bull. 9:11–13.
11. Arganaraz E. R., et al. 2001. Blood-sucking lice may disseminate Trypanosoma cruzi infection in baboons. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 43:271–276. [PubMed]
12. Arnold H. L., Bell D. B. 1944. Kissing bug bites. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 74:436–442.
13. Atias A. 1994. A case of congenital chagasic megaesophagus: evolution until death caused by esophageal neoplasm, at 27 years of age. Rev. Med. Chil. 122:319–322. [PubMed]
14. Azogue E., Darras C. 1991. Prospective study of Chagas disease in newborn children with placental infection caused by Trypanosoma cruzi (Santa Cruz-Bolivia). Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 24:105–109. [PubMed]
15. Badra E. S., et al. 2008. Histopathological changes in the placentas and fetuses of mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi isolated from the Myotis nigricans nigricans bat. J. Comp. Pathol. 139:108–112. [PubMed]
16. Barcan L., et al. 2005. Transmission of T. cruzi infection via liver transplantation to a nonreactive recipient for Chagas' disease. Liver Transplant. 11:1112–1116. [PubMed]
17. Barnabe C., Yaeger R., Pung O., Tibayrenc M. 2001. Trypanosoma cruzi: a considerable phylogenetic divergence indicates that the agent of Chagas disease is indigenous to the native fauna of the United States. Exp. Parasitol. 99:73–79. [PubMed]
18. Barr S., Baker D., Markovits J. 1986. Trypanosomiasis and laryngeal paralysis in a dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 188:1307–1309. [PubMed]
19. Barr S. C., Brown C. C., Dennis V. A., Klei T. R. 1991. The lesions and prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi in opossums and armadillos from southern Louisiana. J. Parasitol. 77:624–627. [PubMed]
20. Barr S. C., Dennis V. A., Klei T. R. 1991. Serologic and blood culture survey of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in four canine populations of southern Louisiana. Am. J. Vet. Res. 52:570–573. [PubMed]
21. Barr S. C., Gossett K. A., Klei T. R. 1991. Clinical, clinicopathologic, and parasitologic observations of trypanosomiasis in dogs infected with North American Trypanosoma cruzi isolates. Am. J. Vet. Res. 52:954–960. [PubMed]
22. Barr S. C., et al. 1989. Chronic dilatative myocarditis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi in two dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 195:1237–1241. [PubMed]
23. Barr S. C., et al. 1995. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Walker hounds from Virginia. Am. J. Vet. Res. 56:1037–1044. [PubMed]
24. Basombrio M. A., et al. 1999. The transmission de Chagas disease in Salta and the detection of congenital cases. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 59(Suppl. 2):143–146. [PubMed]
25. Basquiera A. L., et al. 2003. Risk progression to chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy: influence of male sex and of parasitaemia detected by PCR. Heart 89:1186–1190. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Beard C. B., et al. 2003. Chagas disease in a domestic transmission cycle, southern Texas, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:103–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Beard C. B., Young D. G., Butler J. F., Evans D. A. 1988. First isolation of Trypanosoma cruzi from a wild-caught Triatoma sanguisuga (LeConte) (Hemiptera: Triatominae) in Florida, USA. J. Parasitol. 74:343–344. [PubMed]
28. Beltrao B., et al. 2009. Investigation of two outbreaks of suspected oral transmission of acute Chagas disease in the Amazon region, Para State, Brazil, in 2007. Trop. Doct. 39:231–232. [PubMed]
29. Bern C., Montgomery S. P. 2009. An estimate of the burden of Chagas disease in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:e52–54. [PubMed]
30. Bern C., et al. 2007. Evaluation and treatment of Chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 298:2171–2181. [PubMed]
31. Bern C., Montgomery S. P., Katz L., Caglioti S., Stramer S. L. 2008. Chagas disease and the US blood supply. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 21:476–482. [PubMed]
32. Bern C., et al. 2009. Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi transmission in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:1667–1674. [PubMed]
33. Bestetti R. B., Theodoropoulos T. A. 2009. A systematic review of studies on heart transplantation for patients with end-stage Chagas' heart disease. J. Card. Fail. 15:249–255. [PubMed]
34. Bittencourt A. L. 1992. Possible risk factors for vertical transmission of Chagas' disease. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 34:403–408. [PubMed]
35. Bittencourt A. L., Rodrigues de Freitas L. A., Galvao de Araujo M. O., Jacomo K. 1981. Pneumonitis in congenital Chagas' disease. A study of ten cases. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 30:38–42. [PubMed]
36. Bittencourt A. L., Sadigursky M., Barbosa H. S. 1975. Congenital Chagas' disease. Study of 29 cases. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 17:146–159. [PubMed]
37. Bittencourt A. L., Vieira G. O., Tavares H. C., Mota E., Maguire J. 1984. Esophageal involvement in congenital Chagas' disease. Report of a case with megaesophagus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 33:30–33. [PubMed]
38. Bocchi E. A., Fiorelli A. 2001. The Brazilian experience with heart transplantation: a multicenter report. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 20:637–645. [PubMed]
39. Bocchi E. A., Fiorelli A. 2001. The paradox of survival results after heart transplantation for cardiomyopathy caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. First Guidelines Group for Heart Transplantation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 71:1833–1838. [PubMed]
40. Bosseno M. F., et al. 2002. Predominance of Trypanosoma cruzi lineage I in Mexico. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:627–632. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Bradley K. K., Bergman D. K., Woods J. P., Crutcher J. M., Kirchhoff L. V. 2000. Prevalence of American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease) among dogs in Oklahoma. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 217:1853–1857. [PubMed]
42. Brashear R. J., et al. 1995. Detection of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi among blood donors in the southwestern and western United States. I. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting antibodies to T. cruzi. Transfusion 35:213–218. [PubMed]
43. Briones M. R., Souto R. P., Stolf B. S., Zingales B. 1999. The evolution of two Trypanosoma cruzi subgroups inferred from rRNA genes can be correlated with the interchange of American mammalian faunas in the Cenozoic and has implications to pathogenicity and host specificity. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 104:219–232. [PubMed]
44. Brisse S., Barnabe C., Tibayrenc M. 2000. Identification of six Trypanosoma cruzi phylogenetic lineages by random amplified polymorphic DNA and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Int. J. Parasitol. 30:35–44. [PubMed]
45. Brisse S., et al. 2003. Evidence for genetic exchange and hybridization in Trypanosoma cruzi based on nucleotide sequences and molecular karyotype. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2:173–183. [PubMed]
46. Brown E. L., et al. 2010. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi among eleven potential reservoir species from six states across the southern United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 10:757–763. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Brucher B. L., Stein H. J., Bartels H., Feussner H., Siewert J. R. 2001. Achalasia and esophageal cancer: incidence, prevalence, and prognosis. World J. Surg. 25:745–749. [PubMed]
48. Buekens P., et al. 2008. Mother-to-child transmission of Chagas' disease in North America: why don't we do more? Matern. Child Health J. 12:283–286. [PubMed]
49. Burkholder J. E., Allison T. C., Kelly V. P. 1980. Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas) (Protozoa: Kinetoplastida) in invertebrate, reservoir, and human hosts of the lower Rio Grande valley of Texas. J. Parasitol. 66:305–311. [PubMed]
50. Burleigh B. A., Andrews N. W. 1995. The mechanisms of Trypanosoma cruzi invasion of mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49:175–200. [PubMed]
51. Campbell D. A., Westenberger S. J., Sturm N. R. 2004. The determinants of Chagas disease: connecting parasite and host genetics. Curr. Mol. Med. 4:549–562. [PubMed]
52. Campos S. V., et al. 2008. Risk factors for Chagas' disease reactivation after heart transplantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 27:597–602. [PubMed]
53. Cancado J. R., Brener Z. 1979. Terapeutica, p. 362–424In Brener Z., Andrade Z., editors. (ed.), Trypanosoma cruzi e doença de Chagas, 1st ed. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
54. Cantey P. T., Hand S., Currier M., Jett P., Montgomery S. 2008. Chagas disease in Mississippi: investigation of suspected autochthonous infections in the United States, abstr. H3, p. 146 2008 Int. Conf. Emerg. Infect. Dis. International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA.
55. Carlier Y., Torrico F. 2003. Congenital infection with Trypanosoma cruzi: from mechanisms of transmission to strategies for diagnosis and control. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 36:767–771. [PubMed]
56. Carlier Y., Truyens C. 2010. Maternal-fetal transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi, p. 539–581In Telleria J., Tibayrenc M., editors. (ed.), American trypanosomiasis-Chagas disease: one hundred years of research. Elsevier, New York, NY.
57. Carranza J. C., et al. 2009. Trypanosoma cruzi maxicircle heterogeneity in Chagas disease patients from Brazil. Int. J. Parasitol. 39:963–973. [PubMed]
58. Castanera M. B., Lauricella M. A., Chuit R., Gurtler R. E. 1998. Evaluation of dogs as sentinels of the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in a rural area of north-western Argentina. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 92:671–683. [PubMed]
59. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007. Blood donor screening for Chagas disease—United States, 2006–2007. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 56:141–143. [PubMed]
60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006. Chagas disease after organ transplantation—Los Angeles, California, 2006. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 55:798–800. [PubMed]
61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2002. Chagas disease after organ transplantation—United States, 2001. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:210–212. [PubMed]
62. Chagas C. 1909. Nova tripanosomiaze humana. Estudos sobre morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi n.g., n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade morbida do homen. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1:159–218.
63. Chagas C. 1924. Sobre a verificação do “Trypanosoma cruzi” em macacos do Pará (Chrysothrix sciureus). Sci. Méd. 2:75–76.
64. Chagas C. 1912. Sobre um trypanosomo do tatú, Tatusia novemcincta, transmittido pela Triatoma geniculata Latr. (1811). Possibilidade de ser o tatú um depositario do Trypanosoma cruzi no mundo exterior Brasil. Médico I:305–306.
65. Chin-Hong P. V., et al. 2011. Screening and treatment of Chagas disease in organ transplant recipients in the United States: recommendations from the Chagas in Transplant Working Group. Am. J. Transplant. 11:672–680. [PubMed]
66. Chocair P. R., Sabbaga E., Amato Neto V., Shiroma M., de Goes G. M. 1981. Kidney transplantation: a new way of transmitting Chagas disease. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 23:280–282. [PubMed]
67. Cimo P. L., Luper W. E., Scouros M. A. 1993. Transfusion-associated Chagas' disease in Texas: report of a case. Tex. Med. 89:48–50. [PubMed]
68. Clark C. G., Pung O. J. 1994. Host specificity of ribosomal DNA variation in sylvatic Trypanosoma cruzi from North America. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 66:175–179. [PubMed]
69. Cohen J. E., Gurtler R. E. 2001. Modeling household transmission of American trypanosomiasis. Science 293:694–698. [PubMed]
70. Cordova E., Boschi A., Ambrosioni J., Cudos C., Corti M. 2008. Reactivation of Chagas disease with central nervous system involvement in HIV-infected patients in Argentina, 1992–2007. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 12:587–592. [PubMed]
71. Cordova E., Maiolo E., Corti M., Orduna T. 2010. Neurological manifestations of Chagas' disease. Neurol. Res. 32:238–244. [PubMed]
72. Corrales R. M., et al. 2009. Congenital Chagas disease involves Trypanosoma cruzi sub-lineage IId in the northwestern province of Salta, Argentina. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9:278–282. [PubMed]
73. Coura J. R., de Castro S. L. 2002. A critical review on Chagas disease chemotherapy. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 97:3–24. [PubMed]
74. Coura J. R., Junqueira A. C., Fernandes O., Valente S. A., Miles M. A. 2002. Emerging Chagas disease in Amazonian Brazil. Trends Parasitol. 18:171–176. [PubMed]
75. Covarrubias C., Cortez M., Ferreira D., Yoshida N. 2007. Interaction with host factors exacerbates Trypanosoma cruzi cell invasion capacity upon oral infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 37:1609–1616. [PubMed]
76. Cura C. I., et al. 2010. Trypanosoma cruzi I genotypes in different geographical regions and transmission cycles based on a microsatellite motif of the intergenic spacer of spliced-leader genes. Int. J. Parasitol. 40:1599–1607. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Davis D. J. 1943. Triatoma sanguisuga (LeConte) and Triatoma ambigua Neiva as natural carriers of Trypanosoma cruzi in Texas. Public Health Rep. 58:353–354.
78. Davis D. S., Russell L. H., Adams L. G., Yaeger R. G., Robinson R. M. 1980. An experimental infection of Trypanosoma cruzi in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). J. Wildl. Dis. 16:403–406. [PubMed]
79. de Faria J. B., Alves G. 1993. Transmission of Chagas' disease through cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 56:1583–1584. [PubMed]
80. de Freitas J. M., et al. 2006. Ancestral genomes, sex, and the population structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Pathog. 2:e24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
81. Delgado M. A., Santos-Buch C. A. 1978. Transplacental transmission and fetal parasitosis of Trypanosoma cruzi in outbred white Swiss mice. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 27:1108–1115. [PubMed]
82. de Noya B. A., et al. 2010. Large urban outbreak of orally acquired acute Chagas disease at a school in Caracas, Venezuela. J. Infect. Dis. 201:1308–1315. [PubMed]
83. de Oliveira R. B., Troncon L. E., Dantas R. O., Menghelli U. G. 1998. Gastrointestinal manifestations of Chagas' disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 93:884–889. [PubMed]
84. de Rezende J. M., Moreira H. 1988. Chagasic megaesophagus and megacolon. Historical review and present concepts. Arq. Gastroenterol. 25(Spec No.):32–43. [PubMed]
85. DeShazo T. 1943. A survey of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Triatoma spp. collected in Texas. J. Bacteriol. 46:219–220.
86. Dias J. C. 2009. Elimination of Chagas disease transmission: perspectives. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 104(Suppl. 1):41–45. [PubMed]
87. Dias J. C., Silveira A. C., Schofield C. J. 2002. The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: a review. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 97:603–612. [PubMed]
88. Diazgranados C. A., et al. 2009. Chagasic encephalitis in HIV patients: common presentation of an evolving epidemiological and clinical association. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9:324–330. [PubMed]
89. Diez M., et al. 2007. Usefulness of PCR strategies for early diagnosis of Chagas' disease reactivation and treatment follow-up in heart transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 7:1633–1640. [PubMed]
90. Dorn P. L., et al. 2007. Autochthonous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi, Louisiana. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13:605–607. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
91. Drugs for Neglected Disease Initiative 2010, posting date Chagas disease: DNDi strategy. http://www.treatchagas.org/rd_dndi_strategy.aspx.
92. Duffy T., et al. 2009. Accurate real-time PCR strategy for monitoring bloodstream parasitic loads in Chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3:e419. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
93. Eads R. B., Hightower B. G. 1952. Blood parasites of south Texas rodents. J. Parasitol. 38:89–90.
94. Eads R. B., Trevino H. A., Campos E. G. 1963. Triatoma (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) infected with Trypanosoma cruzi in south Texas wood rat dens. Southwest Nat. 8:38–42.
95. Ekkens D. 1981. Nocturnal flights of Triatoma (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Sabino Canyon, Arizona. I. Light collections. J. Med. Entomol. 18:211–227.
96. Ekkens D. 1984. Nocturnal flights of Triatoma (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Sabino Canyon, Arizona. II. Neotoma lodge studies. J. Med. Entomol 21:140–144.
97. Estrada-Franco J. G., et al. 2006. Human Trypanosoma cruzi infection and seropositivity in dogs, Mexico. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:624–630. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
98. Feliciangeli M. D., et al. 2003. Chagas disease control in Venezuela: lessons for the Andean region and beyond. Trends Parasitol. 19:44–49. [PubMed]
99. Ferraz A. S., Figueiredo J. F. 1993. Transmission of Chagas' disease through transplanted kidney: occurrence of the acute form of the disease in two recipients from the same donor. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 35:461–463. [PubMed]
100. Ferreira M. S., et al. 1997. Reactivation of Chagas' disease in patients with AIDS: report of three new cases and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 25:1397–1400. [PubMed]
101. Figueiredo J. F., et al. 1990. Transmission of Chagas disease through renal transplantation: report of a case. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 84:61–62. [PubMed]
102. Fiorelli A. I., et al. 2005. Later evolution after cardiac transplantation in Chagas' disease. Transplant. Proc. 37:2793–2798. [PubMed]
103. Food and Drug Administration December 2010, posting date Guidance for industry: use of serological tests to reduce the risk of transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in whole blood and blood components intended for transfusion. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
104. Fores R., et al. 2007. Chagas disease in a recipient of cord blood transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 39:127–128. [PubMed]
105. Fox J. C., Ewing S. A., Buckner R. G., Whitenack D., Manley J. H. 1986. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a dog from Oklahoma. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 189:1583–1584. [PubMed]
106. Frazier C. A. 1974. Biting insect survey: a statistical report. Ann. Allergy 32:200–204. [PubMed]
107. Freilij H., Altcheh J. 1995. Congenital Chagas' disease: diagnostic and clinical aspects. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:551–555. [PubMed]
108. Freilij H., Muller L., Gonzalez Cappa S. M. 1983. Direct micromethod for diagnosis of acute and congenital Chagas' disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:327–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
109. Freitas J. L. P., et al. 1952. Primeiras verficações de transmissão acidental da moléstia de Chagas ao homem por transfusão de sangue. Rev. Paul. Med. 40:36–40. [PubMed]
110. Galvao C., Carcavallo R., Rocha Dda S., Jurberg J. 2003. A checklist of the current valid species of the subfamily Triatominae Jeannel, 1919 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) and their geographical distribution with nomenclatural and taxonomic notes. Zootaxa 202:1–36.
111. Gascon J., Bern C., Pinazo M. J. 2010. Chagas disease in Spain, the United States and other non-endemic countries. Acta Trop. 115:22–27. [PubMed]
112. Gaunt M., Miles M. 2000. The ecotopes and evolution of triatomine bugs (triatominae) and their associated trypanosomes. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 95:557–565. [PubMed]
113. Gerseler P. J., Ito J. I., Tegtmeier B. R., Kerndt P. R., Krance R. 1988. Fulminant Chagas disease in bone marrow transplantation, abstr. 418. Abstr. 27th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., Washington, DC.
114. Grant I. H., et al. 1989. Transfusion-associated acute Chagas disease acquired in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 111:849–851. [PubMed]
115. Grieves J. L., et al. 2008. Trypanosoma cruzi in non-human primates with a history of stillbirths: a retrospective study (Papio hamadryas spp.) and case report (Macaca fascicularis). J. Med. Primatol. 37:318–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
116. Griffith M. E. 1948. The bloodsucking conenose, or “big bedbug,” Triatoma sanguisuga (Leconte), in an Oklahoma City household. Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci. 28:24–27.
117. Grijalva M. J., et al. 2003. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the Amazon region of Ecuador. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 69:380–385. [PubMed]
118. Groce B. 2008. Trypanosoma cruzi in wild raccoons and opossums from Kentucky. Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY.
119. Grogl M., Kuhn R. E., Davis D. S., Green G. E. 1984. Antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in coyotes in Texas. J. Parasitol. 70:189–191. [PubMed]
120. Grundemann A. W. 1947. Studies on the biology of the Triatoma sanguisuga (Leconte) in Kansas (Reduviidae: Triatominae). Kansas Entomol. Soc. 20:77–85.
121. Guedes P. M., et al. 2002. The dog as model for chemotherapy of the Chagas' disease. Acta Trop. 84:9–17. [PubMed]
122. Gurtler R. E., et al. 2007. Domestic dogs and cats as sources of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rural northwestern Argentina. Parasitology 134:69–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
123. Gurtler R. E., et al. 1991. Chagas disease in north-west Argentina: infected dogs as a risk factor for the domestic transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85:741–745. [PubMed]
124. Gurtler R. E., et al. 1998. Influence of humans and domestic animals on the household prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi in Triatoma infestans populations in northwest Argentina. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58:748–758. [PubMed]
125. Haberkorn A., Gonnert R. 1972. Animal experimental investigation into the activity of nifurtimox against Trypanosoma cruzi. Arzneimittelforschung 22:1570–1582. [PubMed]
126. Hagar J. M., Rahimtoola S. H. 1991. Chagas' heart disease in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:763–768. [PubMed]
127. Hall C. A., Pierce E. M., Wimsatt A. N., Hobby-Dolbeer T., Meers J. B. 2010. Virulence and vertical transmission of two genotypically and geographically diverse isolates of Trypanosoma cruzi in mice. J. Parasitol. 96:371–376. [PubMed]
128. Hall C. A., Polizzi C., Yabsley M. J., Norton T. M. 2007. Trypanosoma cruzi prevalence and epidemiologic trends in lemurs on St. Catherines Island, Georgia. J. Parasitol. 93:93–96. [PubMed]
129. Hancock K., et al. 2005. Prevalence of antibodies to Trypanosoma cruzi in raccoons (Procyon lotor) from an urban area of northern Virginia. J. Parasitol. 91:470–472. [PubMed]
130. Herman C. M., Bruce J. I. 1962. Occurrence of Trypanosoma cruzi in Maryland. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Washington 29:55–58.
131. Herrer A. 1964. Chagas' disease in Peru. I. The epidemiological importance of the guinea pig. Trop. Geogr. Med. 16:146–151. [PubMed]
132. Herrera C., et al. 2007. Identifying four Trypanosoma cruzi I isolate haplotypes from different geographic regions in Colombia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 7:535–539. [PubMed]
133. Herwaldt B. L. 2001. Laboratory-acquired parasitic infections from accidental exposures. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14:659–688. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
134. Herwaldt B. L., et al. 2000. Use of PCR to diagnose the fifth reported US case of autochthonous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi, in Tennessee, 1998. J. Infect. Dis. 181:395–399. [PubMed]
135. Hwang W. S., Zhang G., Maslov D., Weirauch C. 2010. Infection rates of Triatoma protracta (Uhler) with Trypanosoma cruzi in Southern California and molecular identification of trypanosomes. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83:1020–1022. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
136. Hypsa V., et al. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): molecular evidence of a New World origin of the Asiatic clade. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 23:447–457. [PubMed]
137. Ibarra-Cerdena C. N., Sanchez-Cordero V., Townsend Peterson A., Ramsey J. M. 2009. Ecology of North American triatominae. Acta Trop. 110:178–186. [PubMed]
138. Ikenga J. O., Richerson J. V. 1984. Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas) (Protozoa: Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in invertebrate and vertebrate hosts from Brewster County in Trans-Pecos Texas. J. Econ. Entomol. 77:126–129. [PubMed]
139. Iwagami M., et al. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of Trypanosoma cruzi from Central America (Guatemala) and a comparison with South American strains. Parasitol. Res. 102:129–134. [PubMed]
140. Jackson Y., et al. 2009. Congenital transmission of Chagas disease in Latin American immigrants in Switzerland. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:601–603. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
141. John D. T., Hoppe K. L. 1986. Trypanosoma cruzi from wild raccoons in Oklahoma. Am. J. Vet. Res. 47:1056–1059. [PubMed]
142. Junqueira A. C., Chiari E., Wincker P. 1996. Comparison of the PCR with two classical parasitological methods for the diagnosis of Chagas disease in an endemic region of north-eastern Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90:129–132. [PubMed]
143. Kaplan J. E., et al. 2009. Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recommend. Rep. 58:1–207. [PubMed]
144. Karsten V., Davis C., Kuhn R. 1992. Trypanosoma cruzi in wild raccoons and opossums in North Carolina. J. Parasitol. 78:547–549. [PubMed]
145. Kasa T. J., Lathrop G. D., Dupuy H. J., Bonney C. H., Toft J. D. 1977. An endemic focus of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a subhuman primate research colony. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 171:850–854. [PubMed]
146. Kierszenbaum F., Gottlieb C. A., Budzko D. B. 1981. Antibody-independent, natural resistance of birds to Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J. Parasitol. 67:656–660. [PubMed]
147. Kimball B. M. 1894. Conorhinus sanguisuga, its habits and life history. Kansas Acad. Sci. 14:128–131.
148. Kirchhoff L. V., Gam A. A., Gilliam F. C. 1987. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease) in Central American immigrants. Am. J. Med. 82:915–920. [PubMed]
149. Kjos S. A. 2009. Characterization of Chagas disease transmission in peridomestic settings in the southwestern United States, p. 55 59th Annu. James H. Steele Conf. Dis. Nat. Transm. Man, Ft. Worth, TX Diseases in Nature Conference, Austin, TX http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/idcu/health/zoonosis/education/conference/DIN/2009/
150. Kjos S. A., et al. 2008. Distribution and characterization of canine Chagas disease in Texas. Vet. Parasitol. 152:249–256. [PubMed]
151. Kjos S. A., Snowden K. F., Olson J. K. 2009. Biogeography and Trypanosoma cruzi infection prevalence of Chagas disease vectors in Texas, USA. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 9:41–50. [PubMed]
152. Klotz J. H., et al. 2010. “Kissing bugs”: potential disease vectors and cause of anaphylaxis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50:1629–1634. [PubMed]
153. Klotz S. A., et al. 2009. Feeding behavior of triatomines from the southwestern United States: an update on potential risk for transmission of Chagas disease. Acta Trop. 111:114–118. [PubMed]
154. Kofoid C. A., Donat F. 1933. The experimental transfer of Trypanosoma cruzi from naturally infected Triatoma protracta to mammals in California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 86:257–259.
155. Kofoid C. A., McCulloch L. 1916. On Trypanosoma triatomae, a new flagellate from a hemipteran bug from the nests of the wood rat Neotoma fuscipes. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 16:113–126.
156. Kofoid C. A., Whitaker B. G. 1936. Natural infection of American human trypanosomiasis in two species of cone-nosed bugs, Triatoma protracta Uhler and Triatoma uhleri Neiva, in the western United States. J. Parasitol. 22:259–263.
157. Kun H., et al. 2009. Transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi by heart transplantation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:1534–1540. [PubMed]
158. Lambert R. C., Kolivras K. N., Resler L. M., Brewster C. C., Paulson S. L. 2008. The potential for emergence of Chagas disease in the United States. Geospatial Health 2:227–239. [PubMed]
159. Lane R. S., et al. 1999. Anti-arthropod saliva antibodies among residents of a community at high risk for Lyme disease in California. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61:850–859. [PubMed]
160. Lathrop G. D., Ominsky A. J. 1965. Chagas disease study in a group of individuals bitten by North American triatomids. Aeromed. Rev. 9:1–5. [PubMed]
161. Leconte J. L. 1855. Remarks on two species of American Cimex. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 7:404.
162. Legey A. P., Pinho A. P., Chagas Xavier S. C., Leon L. L., Jansen A. M. 1999. Humoral immune response kinetics in Philander opossum and Didelphis marsupialis infected and immunized by Trypanosoma cruzi employing an immunofluorescence antibody test. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 94:371–376. [PubMed]
163. Legey A. P., et al. 2003. Trypanosoma cruzi in marsupial didelphids (Philander frenata and Didelphis marsupialis): differences in the humoral immune response in natural and experimental infections. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 36:241–248. [PubMed]
164. Leiby D. A., Herron R. M., Jr., Garratty G., Herwaldt B. L. 2008. Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia in US blood donors with serologic evidence of infection. J. Infect. Dis. 198:609–613. [PubMed]
165. Leiby D. A., Herron R. M., Jr., Read E. J., Lenes B. A., Stumpf R. J. 2002. Trypanosoma cruzi in Los Angeles and Miami blood donors: impact of evolving donor demographics on seroprevalence and implications for transfusion transmission. Transfusion 42:549–555. [PubMed]
166. Leiby D. A., Lenes B. A., Tibbals M. A., Tames-Olmedo M. T. 1999. Prospective evaluation of a patient with Trypanosoma cruzi infection transmitted by transfusion. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:1237–1239. [PubMed]
167. Leiby D. A., et al. 1997. Seroepidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas' disease, in US blood donors. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1047–1052. [PubMed]
168. Leiby D. A., et al. 2000. Serologic testing for Trypanosoma cruzi: comparison of radioimmunoprecipitation assay with commercially available indirect immunofluorescence assay, indirect hemagglutination assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:639–642. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
169. Lent H., Wygodzinsky P. 1979. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas' disease. Bull. Am. Museum Nat. History 63:123–520.
170. Levy M. Z., et al. 2006. Peri-urban infestation by Triatoma infestans carrying Trypanosoma cruzi in Arequipa, Peru. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1345–1352. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
171. Lewis M. D., et al. 2009. Genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi: systematic selection of assays allowing rapid and accurate discrimination of all known lineages. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81:1041–1049. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
172. Llewellyn M. S., et al. 2009. Trypanosoma cruzi IIc: phylogenetic and phylogeographic insights from sequence and microsatellite analysis and potential impact on emergent Chagas disease. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3:e510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
173. Llewellyn M. S., et al. 2009. Genome-scale multilocus microsatellite typing of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing unit I reveals phylogeographic structure and specific genotypes linked to human infection. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
174. Macedo A. M., Pena S. D. J. 1998. Genetic variability of Trypanosoma cruzi: implications for the pathogenesis of Chagas disease. Parasitol. Today 14:119–124. [PubMed]
175. Machado C. A., Ayala F. J. 2001. Nucleotide sequences provide evidence of genetic exchange among distantly related lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:7396–7401. [PubMed]
176. Magill A. J., Reed S. G. 2000. American trypanosomiasis, p. 653–664In Strickland G. T., editor. (ed.), Hunter's tropical medicine and emerging diseases, 8th ed W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA.
177. Maguire J. H. 2004. Trypanosoma, p. 2327–2334In Gorbach S., Bartlett J., Blacklow N., editors. (ed.), Infectious diseases, 2nd ed Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
178. Maguire J. H., et al. 1987. Cardiac morbidity and mortality due to Chagas' disease: prospective electrocardiographic study of a Brazilian community. Circulation 75:1140–1145. [PubMed]
179. Maloney J., et al. 2010. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi in raccoons from Tennessee. J. Parasitol. 96:353–358. [PubMed]
180. Marchiori P. E., et al. 2007. Late reactivation of Chagas' disease presenting in a recipient as an expansive mass lesion in the brain after heart transplantation of chagasic myocardiopathy. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 26:1091–1096. [PubMed]
181. Marcili A., et al. 2009. Comparative phylogeography of Trypanosoma cruzi TcIIc: new hosts, association with terrestrial ecotopes, and spatial clustering. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9:1265–1274. [PubMed]
182. Marin-Neto J. A., Cunha-Neto E., Maciel B. C., Simoes M. V. 2007. Pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease. Circulation 115:1109–1123. [PubMed]
183. Martinez-Ibarra J. A., et al. 2007. Biology of three species of North American Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) fed on rabbits. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 102:925–930. [PubMed]
184. Martinez-Ibarra J. A., Galaviz-Silva L., Campos C. L., Trujillo-Garcia J. C. 1992. Distribucion de los triatominos asociados al domicilio humano en el municipio de general Teran, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Southwest Entomol. 17:261–264.
185. McKeever S., Gorman G. W., Norman L. 1958. Occurrence of a Trypanosoma cruzi-like organism in some mammals from southwestern Georgia and northwestern Florida. J. Parasitol. 44:583–587. [PubMed]
186. McKown R. D., Upton S. J., Klemm R. D., Ridley R. K. 1990. New host and locality record for Trypanosoma peromysci. J. Parasitol. 76:281–283. [PubMed]
187. Mehringer P. J., Wood S. F. 1958. A resampling of wood rat houses and human habitations in Griffith Park, Los Angeles, for Triatoma protracta and Trypanosoma cruzi. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 57:39–46.
188. Meirelles M. N., De Souza W. 1985. Killing of Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania mexicana, and survival of Toxoplasma gondii, in chicken macrophages in vitro. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. 17:327–334. [PubMed]
189. Meurs K. M., Anthony M. A., Slater M., Miller M. W. 1998. Chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs: 11 cases (1987–1996). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 213:497–500. [PubMed]
190. Meymandi S. K., et al. 2009. Prevalence of Chagas disease in U.S. immigrant population with conduction abnormalities on electrocardiogram, abstr. 410. Abstr. 58th Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., Washington, DC, 18 to 22 November 2009.
191. Miles M. A., et al. 1981. Do radically dissimilar Trypanosoma cruzi strains (zymodemes) cause Venezuelan and Brazilian forms of Chagas' disease? Lancet i:1338–1340. [PubMed]
192. Miles M. A., Feliciangeli M. D., de Arias A. R. 2003. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease) and the role of molecular epidemiology in guiding control strategies. BMJ 326:1444–1448. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
193. Miles M. A., et al. 2009. The molecular epidemiology and phylogeography of Trypanosoma cruzi and parallel research on Leishmania: looking back and to the future. Parasitology 136:1509–1528. [PubMed]
194. Ministério da Saúde Brasil 2005. Brazilian consensus on Chagas disease. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 38(Suppl. 3):7–29. [PubMed]
195. Moffett A., et al. 2009. A global public database of disease vector and reservoir distributions. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3:e378. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
196. Moncayo A., Ortiz Yanine M. I. 2006. An update on Chagas disease (human American trypanosomiasis). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 100:663–677. [PubMed]
197. Mora M. C., et al. 2005. Early diagnosis of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection using PCR, hemoculture, and capillary concentration, as compared with delayed serology. J. Parasitol. 91:1468–1473. [PubMed]
198. Mortenson E. W., Walsh J. D. 1963. Review of the Triatoma protracta problem in the Sierra Nevada foothills of California, p. 44–45 In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the California Mosquito Control Association California Mosquito Control Association, Sacramento, CA.
199. Mota E., et al. 1984. Megaesophagus and seroreactivity to Trypanosoma cruzi in a rural community in northeast Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 33:820–826. [PubMed]
200. Mott K. E., Lehman J. S., Jr., hoff R., et al. 1976. The epidemiology and household distribution of seroreactivity to Trypanosoma cruzi in a rural community in northeast Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 25:552–562. [PubMed]
201. Mott K. E., et al. 1978. House construction, triatomine distribution, and household distribution of seroreactivity to Trypanosoma cruzi in a rural community in northeast Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 27:1116–1122. [PubMed]
202. Muñoz J., Portus M., Corachan M., Fumado V., Gascon J. 2007. Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a non-endemic area. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 101:1161–1162. [PubMed]
203. Navin T. R., et al. 1985. Human and sylvatic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in California. Am. J. Public Health 75:366–369. [PubMed]
204. Nichols N., Green T. W. 1963. Allergic reactions to “kissing bug” bites. Calif. Med. 98:267–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
205. Nieto P. D., et al. 2009. Comparison of two immunochromatographic assays and the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test for diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs in south central Louisiana. Vet. Parasitol. 165:241–247. [PubMed]
206. Nissen E. E., Roberson E. L., Liham L. B., Hanson W. L. 1977. Naturally occurring Chagas disease in a South Carolina puppy. 114th Am. Assoc. Vet. Parasitol. Forum, p. 122.
207. Noble E. R., Shipman D. 1958. Trypanosomes in American ground squirrels. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 5:247–249.
208. Nobrega A. A., et al. 2009. Oral transmission of Chagas disease by consumption of acai palm fruit, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15:653–655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
209. Ochs D. E., Hnilica V. S., Moser D. R., Smith J. H., Kirchhoff L. V. 1996. Postmortem diagnosis of autochthonous acute chagasic myocarditis by PCR amplification of a species-specific DNA sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 54:526–529. [PubMed]
210. O'Connor O., Bosseno M. F., Barnabe C., Douzery E. J., Breniere S. F. 2007. Genetic clustering of Trypanosoma cruzi I lineage evidenced by intergenic miniexon gene sequencing. Infect. Genet. Evol. 7:587–593. [PubMed]
211. Oliveira I., Torrico F., Munoz J., Gascon J. 2010. Congenital transmission of Chagas disease: a clinical approach. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 8:945–956. [PubMed]
212. Olsen P. F., Shoemaker J. P., Turner H. F., Hays K. L. 1964. Incidence of Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas) in wild vectors and reservoirs in east-central Alabama. J. Parasitol. 50:599–603. [PubMed]
213. Olson L. C., Skinner S. F., Palotay J. L., McGhee G. E. 1986. Encephalitis associated with Trypanosoma cruzi in a Celebes black macaque. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36:667–670. [PubMed]
214. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2006. Estimación cuantitativa de la enfermedad de Chagas en las Americas OPS/HDM/CD/425-06. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, DC.
215. Packchanian A. 1940. Experimental transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in animals by Triatoma sanguisuga ambigua. Public Health Rep. 55:1526–1532.
216. Packchanian A. 1943. The infectivity of the Texas strain of Trypansoma cruzi to man. Am. J. Trop. Med. 23:309–314.
217. Packchanian A. 1939. Natural infection of Triatoma gerstaeckeri with Trypanosoma cruzi in Texas. Public Health Rep. 54:1547–1554. [PubMed]
218. Packchanian A. 1940. Natural infection of Triatoma heidemanni with Trypanosoma cruzi in Texas. Public Health Rep. 55:1300–1306.
219. Packchanian A. 1942. Reservoir hosts of Chagas' disease in the State of Texas. Natural infection of nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus texanus), house mice (Mus musculus), opossum (Didelphis virginiana), and wood rats (Neotoma micropus micropus), with Trypanosoma cruzi in the state of Texas. Am. J. Trop. Med. 22:623–631.
220. Pan American Health Organization 2010, posting date Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). http://www.paho.org/english/ad/dpc/cd/chagas.htm.
221. Paredes G. E. A., Valdez Miranda J., Nogueda Torres B., Alejandre-Aguilar R., Canett Romero R. 2001. Vectorial importance of Triatominae bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Guaymas, Mexico. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol. 43:119–122. [PubMed]
222. Parrish E. A., Mead A. J. 2010. Determining the prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi in road-killed opossums (Didelphis virginiana) from Baldwin County, Georgia, using PCR. Georgia J. Sci. 68:132–139.
223. Patterson J. S., Schofield C. J., Dujardin J. P., Miles M. A. 2001. Population morphometric analysis of the tropicopolitan bug Triatoma rubrofasciata and relationships with old world species of Triatoma: evidence of New World ancestry. Med. Vet. Entomol. 15:443–451. [PubMed]
224. Pietrzak S. M., Pung O. J. 1998. Trypanosomiasis in raccoons from Georgia. J. Wildl. Dis. 34:132–136. [PubMed]
225. Pinho A. P., Cupolillo E., Mangia R. H., Fernandes O., Jansen A. M. 2000. Trypanosoma cruzi in the sylvatic environment: distinct transmission cycles involving two sympatric marsupials. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 94:509–514. [PubMed]
226. Pinnas J. L., Lindberg R. E., Chen T. M., Meinke G. C. 1986. Studies of kissing bug-sensitive patients: evidence for the lack of cross-reactivity between Triatoma protracta and Triatoma rubida salivary gland extracts. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 77:364–370. [PubMed]
227. Pinto C. M., et al. 2010. Using museum collections to detect pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:356–357. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
228. Pippin W. F. 1970. The biology and vector capability of Triatoma sanguisuga texana Usinger and Triatoma gerstaeckeri (Stal) compared with Rhodnius prolixus (Stal) (Hemiptera: Triatominae). J. Med. Entomol. 7:30–45. [PubMed]
229. Pippin W. F., Law P. F., Gaylor M. J. 1968. Triatoma sanguisuga texana Usinger and Triatoma sanguisuga indictiva Neiva naturally infected with Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas in Texas (Hemiptera: Triatominae) (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomidae). J. Med. Entomol. 5:134. [PubMed]
230. Pless M., et al. 1992. The epidemiology of Chagas' disease in a hyperendemic area of Cochabamba, Bolivia: a clinical study including electrocardiography, seroreactivity to Trypanosoma cruzi, xenodiagnosis, and domiciliary triatomine distribution. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 47:539–546. [PubMed]
231. Pung O. J., Banks C. W., Jones D. N., Krissinger M. W. 1995. Trypanosoma cruzi in wild raccoons, opossums, and triatomine bugs in southeast Georgia, USA. J. Parasitol. 81:324–326. [PubMed]
232. Pung O. J., Spratt J., Clark C. G., Norton T. M., Carter J. 1998. Trypanosoma cruzi infection of free-ranging lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) and ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) on St. Catherine's Island, Georgia, USA. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 29:25–30. [PubMed]
233. Rassi A., Jr., Rassi A., Little W. C. 2000. Chagas' heart disease. Clin. Cardiol. 23:883–889. [PubMed]
234. Rassi A., Jr., Rassi A., Marin-Neto J. A. 2010. Chagas disease. Lancet 375:1388–1402. [PubMed]
235. Rassi A., Jr., Rassi A., Rassi S. G. 2007. Predictors of mortality in chronic Chagas disease: a systematic review of observational studies. Circulation 115:1101–1108. [PubMed]
236. Rassi A., Jr., Rassi S. G., Rassi A. 2001. Sudden death in Chagas' disease. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 76:75–96. [PubMed]
237. Reisenman C. E., et al. 2010. Infection of kissing bugs with Trypanosoma cruzi, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:400–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
238. Riarte A., et al. 1999. Chagas' disease in patients with kidney transplants: 7 years of experience 1989–1996. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:561–567. [PubMed]
239. Roellig D. M., et al. 2008. Molecular typing of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14:1123–1125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
240. Roellig D. M., Ellis A. E., Yabsley M. J. 2009. Genetically different isolates of Trypanosoma cruzi elicit different infection dynamics in raccoons (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana). Int. J. Parasitol. 39:1603–1610. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
241. Roellig D. M., Ellis A. E., Yabsley M. J. 2009. Oral transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi with opposing evidence for the theory of carnivory. J. Parasitol. 95:360–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
242. Roellig D. M., et al. 2010. Experimental infection of two South American reservoirs with four distinct strains of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitology 137:959–966. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
243. Rohr A. S., Marshall N. A., Saxon A. 1984. Successful immunotherapy for Triatoma protracta-induced anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 73:369–375. [PubMed]
244. Romana C. A., Brunstein D., Collin-Delavaud A., Sousa O., Ortega-Barria E. 2003. Public policies of development in Latin America and Chagas' disease. Lancet 362:579. [PubMed]
245. Rosypal A. C., Tidwell R. R., Lindsay D. S. 2007. Prevalence of antibodies to Leishmania infantum and Trypanosoma cruzi in wild canids from South Carolina. J. Parasitol. 93:955–957. [PubMed]
246. Rowland M. E., et al. 2010. Factors associated with Trypanosoma cruzi exposure among domestic canines in Tennessee. J. Parasitol. 96:547–551. [PubMed]
247. Russomando G., et al. 1998. Treatment of congenital Chagas' disease diagnosed and followed up by the PCR. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 59:487–491. [PubMed]
248. Ryan C. P., Hughes P. E., Howard E. B. 1985. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease) in a striped skunk. J. Wildl. Dis. 21:175–176. [PubMed]
249. Ryckman R. E. 1962. Biosystematics and hosts of the Triatoma protracta complex in North America (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 27:93–240.
250. Ryckman R. E. 1965. Epizootiology of Trypanosoma cruzi in southwestern North America. I. New collection records and hosts for Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomidae) (Hemiptera: Triatominae). J. Med. Entomol. 2:87–89. [PubMed]
251. Ryckman R. E. 1971. The genus Paratriatoma in western North America. J. Med. Entomol. 8:87–97. [PubMed]
252. Ryckman R. E. 1981. The kissing bug problem in western North America. Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 6:167–169.
253. Ryckman R. E. 1954. Lizards: a laboratory host for Triatominae and Trypansoma cruzi Chagas (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) (Protomonadida: Trypanosomidae). Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 63:215–218.
254. Ryckman R. E. 1984. The Triatominae of North and Central America and the West Indies: a checklist with synonymy (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 9:71–83.
255. Ryckman R. E. 1986. The vertebrate hosts of the Triatominae of North and Central America and the West Indies (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 11:221–241.
256. Ryckman R. E., Ryckman J. V. 1967. Epizootiology of Trypanosoma cruzi in southwestern North America. XII. Does Gause's rule apply to the ectoparasitic Triatominae? (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) (Kinetoplastidae: Trypanosomidae) (Rodentia: Cricetidae). J. Med. Entomol 4:379–386. [PubMed]
257. Sabino E. C., et al. 2010. Enhanced classification of Chagas serologic results and epidemiologic characteristics of seropositive donors at three large blood centers in Brazil. Transfusion 50:2628–2637. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
258. Samudio F., Ortega-Barria E., Saldana A., Calzada J. 2007. Predominance of Trypanosoma cruzi I among Panamanian sylvatic isolates. Acta Trop. 101:178–181. [PubMed]
259. Sarkar S., et al. 2010. Chagas disease risk in Texas. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4:e836. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
260. Sartori A. M., et al. 2007. Manifestations of Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) in patients with HIV/AIDS. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 101:31–50. [PubMed]
261. Sartori A. M., et al. 2002. Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia in chronic Chagas disease: comparison between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative patients. J. Infect. Dis. 186:872–875. [PubMed]
262. Schaffer G. D., Hanson W. L., Davidson W. R., Nettles V. F. 1978. Hematotropic parasites of translocated raccoons in the southeast. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 173:1148–1151. [PubMed]
263. Schenone H., Gaggero M., Sapunar J., Contreras M. C., Rojas A. 2001. Congenital Chagas disease of second generation in Santiago, Chile. Report of two cases. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 43:231–232. [PubMed]
264. Schielke J. E., Selvarangan R., Kyes K. B., Fritsche T. R. 2002. Laboratory diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a colony-raised pigtailed macaque. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41:42–45. [PubMed]
265. Schiffler R. J., Mansur G. P., Navin T. R., Limpakarnjanarat K. 1984. Indigenous Chagas' disease (American trypanosomiasis) in California. JAMA 251:2983–2984. [PubMed]
266. Schijman A. G. 2006. Congenital Chagas disease, p. 223–259In Mushahwar I. K., editor. (ed.), Congenital and other related infectious diseases of the newborn, vol. 13 Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
267. Schijman A. G., et al. 2000. Early diagnosis of recurrence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection by PCR after heart transplantation of a chronic Chagas' heart disease patient. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 19:1114–1117. [PubMed]
268. Schmunis G. A. 1991. Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas' disease: status in the blood supply in endemic and nonendemic countries. Transfusion 31:547–557. [PubMed]
269. Schmunis G. A., Cruz J. R. 2005. Safety of the blood supply in Latin America. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18:12–29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
270. Schofield C. J., Galvao C. 2009. Classification, evolution, and species groups within the Triatominae. Acta Trop. 110:88–100. [PubMed]
271. Secretaria de Vigilancia em Saude de Brasil 2007, posting date Doenca de Chagas Aguda. Nota Tecnica, 9 de Outubro de 2007. http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/nota_chagas_091007.pdf.
272. Silveira-Lacerda E. P., et al. 2004. Chagas' disease: application of TESA-blot in inconclusive sera from a Brazilian blood bank. Vox Sang. 87:204–207. [PubMed]
273. Sjogren R. D., Ryckman R. E. 1966. Epizootiology of Trypanosoma cruzi in southwestern North America. 8. Nocturnal flights of Triatoma protracta (Uhler) as indicated by collections at black light traps (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). J. Med. Entomol. 3:81–92. [PubMed]
274. Snider T. G., Yaeger R. G., Dellucky J. 1980. Myocarditis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi in a native Louisiana dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 177:247–249. [PubMed]
275. Sosa-Estani S., et al. 2008. Use of a rapid test on umbilical cord blood to screen for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in pregnant women in Argentina, Bolivia, Honduras, and Mexico. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 79:755–759. [PubMed]
276. Sosa-Estani S., Segura E. L. 2006. Etiological treatment in patients infected by Trypanosoma cruzi: experiences in Argentina. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 19:583–587. [PubMed]
277. Sosa-Estani S., Segura E. L. 1999. Treatment of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the undetermined phase. Experience and current guidelines of treatment in Argentina. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 94(Suppl. 1):363–365. [PubMed]
278. Sosa Estani S., et al. 1998. Efficacy of chemotherapy with benznidazole in children in the indeterminate phase of Chagas' disease. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 59:526–529. [PubMed]
279. Souza F. F., et al. 2008. Acute chagasic myocardiopathy after orthotopic liver transplantation with donor and recipient serologically negative for Trypanosoma cruzi: a case report. Transplant. Proc. 40:875–878. [PubMed]
280. Stimpert K. K., Montgomery S. P. 2010. Physician awareness of Chagas disease, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 16:871–872. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
281. Streiger M. L., del Barco M. L., Fabbro D. L., Arias E. D., Amicone N. A. 2004. Longitudinal study and specific chemotherapy in children with chronic Chagas' disease, residing in a low endemicity area of Argentina. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 37:365–375. [PubMed]
282. Sullivan T. D., McGregor T., Eads R. B., Davis D. J. 1949. Incidence of Trypanosoma cruzi, Chagas, in Triatoma (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Texas. Am. J. Trop. Med. 29:453–458. [PubMed]
283. Tarleton R. L., Reithinger R., Urbina J. A., Kitron U., Gurtler R. E. 2007. The challenges of Chagas disease—grim outlook or glimmer of hope. PLoS Med. 4:e332. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
284. Telford S. R., Jr., Forrester D. J. 1991. Hemoparasites of raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Florida. J. Wildl. Dis. 27:486–490. [PubMed]
285. Theis J. H., Tibayrenc M., Mason D. T., Ault S. K. 1987. Exotic stock of Trypanosoma cruzi (Schizotrypanum) capable of development in and transmission by Triatoma protracta protracta from California: public health implications. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 36:523–528. [PubMed]
286. Thurman D. C. 1948. Key to Florida Triatoma with additional distribution records for the species (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Florida Entomol. 31:58–62.
287. Tomlinson M. J., Chapman W. L., Jr., Hanson W. L., Gosser H. S. 1981. Occurrence of antibody to Trypanosoma cruzi in dogs in the southeastern United States. Am. J. Vet. Res. 42:1444–1446. [PubMed]
288. Torres-Estrada J. L., Martinez-Ibarra J. A., Garcia-Perez J. A. 2002. Selection of resting sites of Triatoma gerstaeckeri (Stal) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) females under laboratory and field conditions. Folia Entomol. Mexicana 41:63–66.
289. Torrico F., et al. 2004. Maternal Trypanosoma cruzi infection, pregnancy outcome, morbidity, and mortality of congenitally infected and non-infected newborns in Bolivia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 70:201–209. [PubMed]
290. Traina M. I., et al. 2010. Community-based study of Chagas disease prevalence in Los Angeles County, abstr. 497. Abstr. 59th Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., Atlanta, GA, 3 to 7 November 2010.
291. Traina M. I., et al. 2009. Prevalence of Chagas disease in U.S. Latin American immigrant population with cardiomyopathy, abstr. 408. Abstr. 58th Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., Washington, DC, 18 to 22 November 2009.
292. Tyler K. M., Engman D. M. 2001. The life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi revisited. Int. J. Parasitol. 31:472–481. [PubMed]
293. Umezawa E. S., et al. 1999. Evaluation of recombinant antigens for serodiagnosis of Chagas' disease in South and Central America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1554–1560. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
294. Upton S. J., Fridell R. A., Tilley M. 1989. Trypanosoma kansasensis sp. n. from Neotoma floridana in Kansas. J. Wildl. Dis. 25:410–412. [PubMed]
295. Urbina J. A. 2009. New advances in the management of a long-neglected disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:1685–1687. [PubMed]
296. Usinger R. L. 1944. The Triatominae of North and Central America and the West Indies and their public health significance. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
297. Vaidian A. K., Weiss L. M., Tanowitz H. B. 2004. Chagas' disease and AIDS. Kinetoplastid Biol. Dis. 3:2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
298. Vakalis N., Miller J. H., Lauritsen E., Hansen D. 1983. Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies among domestic dogs in New Orleans. J. Louisiana State Med. Soc. 135:14–15. [PubMed]
299. Verani J., et al. 2009. Geographic variation in the sensitivity of recombinant antigen-based rapid tests for chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 80:410–415. [PubMed]
300. Verani J. R., Montgomery S. P., Schulkin J., Anderson B., Jones J. L. 2010. Survey of obstetrician-gynecologists in the United States about Chagas disease. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83:891–895. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
301. Viotti R., Vigliano C., Armenti H., Segura E. 1994. Treatment of chronic Chagas' disease with benznidazole: clinical and serologic evolution of patients with long-term follow-up. Am. Heart J. 127:151–162. [PubMed]
302. Viotti R., et al. 2006. Long-term cardiac outcomes of treating chronic Chagas disease with benznidazole versus no treatment: a nonrandomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 144:724–734. [PubMed]
303. Virreira M., et al. 2006. Congenital Chagas disease in Bolivia is not associated with DNA polymorphism of Trypanosoma cruzi. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 75:871–879. [PubMed]
304. Walsh J. D., Jones J. P. 1962. Public health significance of the cone-nosed bug, Triatoma protracta (Uhler), in the Sierra Nevada foothills of California. Calif. Vector Views 9:33–37.
305. Walton B. C., Bauman P. M., Diamond L. S., Herman C. M. 1958. The isolation and identification of Trypanosoma cruzi from raccoons in Maryland. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 7:603–610. [PubMed]
306. Wegner D. H., Rohwedder R. W. 1972. The effect of nifurtimox in acute Chagas' infection. Arzneimittelforschung 22:1624–1635. [PubMed]
307. Wendel S., Brener Z. 1992. Historical aspects, p. 5–12 In Wendel S., Brener Z., Camargo M. E., Rassi A., editors. (ed.), Chagas disease-American trypanosomiasis: its impact on transfusion and clinical medicine. International Society of Blood Transfusion, Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
308. Wendel S., Leiby D. A. 2007. Parasitic infections in the blood supply: assessing and countering the threat. Dev. Biol. (Basel) 127:17–41. [PubMed]
309. Westenberger S. J., Barnabe C., Campbell D. A., Sturm N. R. 2005. Two hybridization events define the population structure of Trypanosoma cruzi. Genetics 171:527–543. [PubMed]
310. Westenberger S. J., Sturm N. R., Campbell D. A. 2006. Trypanosoma cruzi 5S rRNA arrays define five groups and indicate the geographic origins of an ancestor of the heterozygous hybrids. Int. J. Parasitol. 36:337–346. [PubMed]
311. WHO Expert Committee 2002. Control of Chagas disease. WHO technical report series number 905. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
312. Williams G. D., et al. 1977. Naturally occurring trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease) in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 171:171–177. [PubMed]
313. Williams J. T., Dick E. J., Jr., VandeBerg J. L., Hubbard G. B. 2009. Natural Chagas disease in four baboons. J. Med. Primatol 38:107–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
314. Wincker P., et al. 1997. PCR-based diagnosis for Chagas' disease in Bolivian children living in an active transmission area: comparison with conventional serological and parasitological diagnosis. Parasitology 114:367–373. [PubMed]
315. Wolf A. F. 1969. Sensitivity to Triatoma bite. Ann. Allergy 27:271–273. [PubMed]
316. Wood F. 1934. Natural and experimental infection of Triatoma protracta Uhler and mammals in California with American human trypanosomiasis Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 14:497–517.
317. Wood F. 1936. Trypanosoma neotomae, sp. nov., in the dusky-footed wood rat and the wood rat flea. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 41:133–143.
318. Wood F. D., Wood S. F. 1937. Occurrence of haematozoa in some California birds and mammals. J. Parasitol. 23:197–201.
319. Wood S., Wood F. 1967. Ecological relationships of Triatoma p. protracta (Uhler) in Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California. Pacific Insects 9:537–550.
320. Wood S. F. 1944. An additional California locality for Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas in the western cone-nosed bug, Triatoma protracta (Uhler). J. Parasitol. 30:199.
321. Wood S. F. 1949. Additional observations on Trypanosoma cruzi, Chagas, from Arizona in insects, rodents, and experimentally infected animals. Am. J. Trop. Med. 29:43–55. [PubMed]
322. Wood S. F. 1950. Allergic sensitivity to the saliva of the western cone-nosed bug. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 49:71–73.
323. Wood S. F. 1962. Blood parasites of mammals of the California Sierra Nevada Foothills, with special reference to Trypanosoma cruzi and Hepatozoon leptosoma sp. n. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 61:161–176.
324. Wood S. F. 1959. Body weight and blood meal size in conenose bugs, Triatoma and Paratriatoma. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 58:116–118.
325. Wood S. F. 1941. Chagas' disease (does it exist in men in Arizona?). Southwest Med. April 1941:112–114.
326. Wood S. F. 1965. Conenose bugs (Triatoma) visit unoccupied boy's camp in Los Angeles. J. Med. Entomol. 1:347–348. [PubMed]
327. Wood S. F. 1951. Importance of feeding and defecation times of insect vectors in transmission of Chagas' disease. J. Econ Entomol. 44:52–54.
328. Wood S. F. 1952. Mammal blood parasite records from Southwestern United States and Mexico. J. Parasitol. 38:85–86.
329. Wood S. F. 1975. New localities for mammal blood parasites from southwestern United States. J. Parasitol. 61:969–970. [PubMed]
330. Wood S. F. 1941. New localities for Trypanosoma cruzi Chagas in southwestern United States. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 34:1–13.
331. Wood S. F. 1975. Notes on possible natural control agents for conenose bugs: Triatoma and Paratriatoma (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Natl. Pest Control Operator News 35:16–18.
332. Wood S. F. 1941. Notes on the distribution and habits of reduviid vectors of Chagas' disease in the southwestern United States, part I. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 17:85–94.
333. Wood S. F. 1941. Notes on the distribution and habits of reduviid vectors of Chagas' disease in the southwestern United States, part II. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 17:115–118.
334. Wood S. F. 1944. Notes on the feeding of the cone-nosed bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). J. Parasitol. 30:197–198.
335. Wood S. F. 1942. Observations on vectors of Chagas' disease in the United States. Calif. Bull. Soc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 41:61–69.
336. Wood S. F. 1943. Observations on vectors of Chagas' disease in the United States. II. Arizona. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 23:315–320.
337. Wood S. F. 1946. The occurrence of Trypanosoma conorhini Donovan in the reduviid bug, Triatoma rubrofasciata (Degeer) from Oahu T. H. Proc. Haw. Entomol. Soc. 12:651.
338. Wood S. F. 1944. The reptile associates of wood rats and cone-nosed bugs. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 43:44–48.
339. Wood S. F. 1975. Trypanosoma cruzi: new foci of enzootic Chagas' disease in California. Exp. Parasitol. 38:153–160. [PubMed]
340. Wood S. F., Wood F. D. 1964. Nocturnal aggregation and invasion of homes in southern California by insect vectors of Chagas' disease. J. Econ. Entomol. 57:775–776.
341. Wood S. F., Wood F. D. 1961. Observations on vectors of Chagas' disease in the United States. III. New Mexico. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 10:155–162. [PubMed]
342. Woody N. C., Woody H. B. 1955. American trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease); first indigenous case in the United States. JAMA 159:676–677. [PubMed]
343. World Health Organization 2008. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/index.html.
344. World Health Organization 2007, posting date New global effort to eliminate Chagas disease (press release). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2007/pr36/en/index.html.
345. Yabsley M. J., Noblet G. P. 2002. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi in raccoons from South Carolina and Georgia. J. Wildl. Dis. 38:75–83. [PubMed]
346. Yabsley M. J., Noblet G. P., Pung O. J. 2001. Comparison of serological methods and blood culture for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in raccoons (Procyon lotor). J. Parasitol. 87:1155–1159. [PubMed]
347. Yaeger R. G. 1961. The present status of Chagas' disease in the United States. Bull. Tulane Univ. Med. Fac. 21:9–13. [PubMed]
348. Yaeger R. G. 1988. The prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in armadillos collected at a site near New Orleans, Louisiana. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 38:323–326. [PubMed]
349. Yeo M., et al. 2005. Origins of Chagas disease: Didelphis species are natural hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi I and armadillos hosts of Trypanosoma cruzi II, including hybrids. Int. J. Parasitol. 35:225–233. [PubMed]
350. Yoshida N. 2008. Trypanosoma cruzi infection by oral route: how the interplay between parasite and host components modulates infectivity. Parasitol. Int. 57:105–109. [PubMed]
351. Young C., Losikoff P., Chawla A., Glasser L., Forman E. 2007. Transfusion-acquired Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Transfusion 47:540–544. [PubMed]
352. Zeledon R., Alvarado R., Jiron L. F. 1977. Observations on the feeding and defecation patterns of three triatomine species (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Trop. 34:65–77. [PubMed]
353. Zingales B., et al. 2009. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 104:1051–1054. [PubMed]
Articles from Clinical Microbiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)