|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Normal human aging is accompanied by progressive brain tissue loss and cognitive decline; however, several factors are thought to influence brain aging. We applied tensor-based morphometry to high-resolution brain MRI scans to determine whether educational level or physical activity was associated with brain tissue volumes in the elderly, particularly in regions susceptible to age-related atrophy. We mapped the 3D profile of brain volume differences in 226 healthy elderly subjects (130F/96M; 77.9 ± 3.6 SD years) from the Cardiovascular Health Study-Cognition Study. Statistical maps revealed the 3D profile of brain regions whose volumes were associated with educational level and physical activity (based on leisure-time energy expenditure). After controlling for age, sex, and physical activity, higher educational levels were associated with ~2–3% greater tissue volumes, on average, in the temporal lobe gray matter. After controlling for age, sex, and education, greater physical activity was associated with ~2–2.5% greater average tissue volumes in the white matter of the corona radiata extending into the parietal-occipital junction. Body mass index (BMI) was highly correlated with both education and physical activity, so we examined BMI as a contributing factor by including physical activity, education, and BMI in the same model; only BMI effects remained significant. This is one of the largest MRI studies of factors influencing structural brain aging, and BMI may be a key factor explaining the observed relationship between education, physical activity, and brain structure. Independent contributions to brain structure could not be teased apart as all these factors were highly correlated with one another.
By 2030, 14% of the world’s population will be over age 65, and advancing age is the most important risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease [Kinsella and He, 2009]. Given the personal toll and increasing economic cost of dementia to society, there is a need to identify factors that may protect against neurodegeneration. Here we aimed to determine whether age-associated brain atrophy is related to education and physical activity in the elderly. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reveal subtle brain changes in aging populations, sometimes years before cognitive deficits are detectable [Scahill et al., 2003; Thompson and Apostolova, 2007]. We used tensor-based morphometry (TBM) to provide detailed information on brain structure from volumetric MRI [Hua et al., 2008a] and to examine factors that may statistically diminish the risk for brain atrophy.
Several prior studies examined the impact of educational background on cognitive functioning, often to assess the brain reserve hypothesis [Stern, 2002]. The brain reserve hypothesis states that positive lifestyle factors, including educational attainment, may increase brain resilience against neurodegeneration, or its functional consequences. Some studies found that the level of brain atrophy in the elderly was related to educational level [Coffey et al., 1999; Gordon et al., 2008; Staff et al., 2004], but others did not [Christensen et al., 2007; Kidron et al., 1997]. Only one other MRI study has investigated the effects of education on brain structure, after controlling for physical activity [Gordon et al., 2008], and found that higher educational level predicted preserved white matter in inferior frontal areas, in healthy adults.
Physical activity and exercise are inversely related to the level of age-related brain atrophy [Colcombe et al., 2003; Colcombe et al., 2006; Gordon et al., 2008; Marks et al., 2007] and to cognitive decline [Carro et al., 2001; Lopez et al., 2003a; Neeper et al., 1995; Yaffe et al., 2001]. Physical activity can induce changes in hippocampal structure [Cotman et al., 2007], increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor [Neeper et al., 1995], and insulin-like growth factor [Carro et al., 2001], and increased neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus [van Praag et al., 1999]. Further, higher levels of aerobic fitness have been associated with greater hippocampal volume and better performance on spatial memory tasks [Erickson et al., 2009].
A number of recent neuroimaging studies, including cross-sectional and interventional approaches, have further supported the positive effects of physical activity on brain structure and function. A cross-sectional voxel-based morphometry study found a positive correlation between physical activity levels and larger gray matter volumes, in the prefrontal and cingulate cortex [Floel et al., 2009]. A recent interventional study found that total physical activity was positively associated with memory scores and gray matter volumes in prefrontal and cingulate cortex [Ruscheweyh et al., 2009] in an elderly cohort. In a group of university students, another longitudinal study found a relationship between aerobic exercise training and preservation of insula gray matter and improved mental health [Gondoh et al., 2009].
Prior reports found that education [Gordon et al., 2008] and physical activity [Bugg and Head, 2009; Burns et al., 2008; Colcombe et al., 2003; Colcombe et al., 2006; Gordon et al., 2008] were associated with reduced age-related atrophy. Even so, the effects of BMI were not evaluated in these prior studies of education and physical activity, even though we have shown it to be strongly linked to the level of atrophy in the brain [Raji et al., 2010]. This raises an important question about how much the positive effects of education and physical activity may be equally explainable by obesity, or whether they have an independent effect. In this study, we set out to determine if education and physical activity had detectable effects on the brain, and if so, whether BMI might equally account for them. Our first hypothesis was that higher levels of education and physical activity might be associated with higher brain volumes in regions implicated in past studies of exercise, such as the temporal lobes. Our second hypothesis was that these effects would be attenuated if BMI was also included in the statistical model. We also hypothesized that higher BMI would still be associated with lower regional brain volumes, after controlling for physical activity, education, age, and sex. To explore how all these factors relate to brain structure, we analyzed brain MRI scans from 226 healthy elderly subjects using TBM. We examined how education, physical activity, and BMI were related to regional brain volumes using 3D statistical maps and region-of-interest analyses.
The Cardiovascular Health Study-Cognition Study (CHS-CS) was designed to determine the incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in a population of subjects identified as normal or MCI in 1998–99 [Lopez et al., 2003b]. In 1998–1999, 456 subjects had complete neurological and neuropsychological examinations and were scanned with 3D volumetric brain MRI [Raji et al., 2009]. Of the 456 available subjects, 226 subjects (77.9 ± 3.6SD years of age; 130F/96M), met the following criteria: (i) MRI scan in 1998–1999, (ii) physical activity and education data available, (iii) body mass index (BMI) measurements, (iv) cognitively normal (95.1 ± 4.3 points on the Modified Mini-Mental State exam (3MS)), and not classified as MCI or AD in 1998–1999 at the time of the MRI scan [Teng and Chui, 1987].
All subjects (N = 226) examined in this study had weight (pounds or kilograms) and height (inches or centimeters) measurements taken during a physical exam. All values were converted to weight (pounds) and height (inches) and BMI was computed using the following standard formula: weight (lb) × 703/[height (in)]2, using a constant to account for the unit conversion.
For analysis, subjects were categorized into groups based on the number of years of education they had completed: some high school (<12 years), completed high school (12 years), some college/vocational school (13–17 years), completed college (18 years), and professional school (>18 years) (Table I).
Leisure-time activities over the two weeks prior to the scan were assessed, and estimated in kcal/week, based on the modified Minnesota Leisure-Time Activities questionnaire [Geffken et al., 2001; Taylor et al., 1978]. Subjects were asked about the frequency and duration of time spent in 15 different leisure-time activities over the previous two weeks, to estimate the number of kilocalories of energy expended per week. For analysis, energy expenditure measured in kilocalories per week was divided into quintiles (Table II). The binning into quintiles is performed because physical activity tends to be non-normally distributed, and somewhat skewed, with many subjects at the low end of the range. Binning was also used since transforming the data (e.g., taking the log) did not resolve this distributional issue. We also analyzed the data, categorized into quartiles instead of quintiles. Basal metabolic rate was not included.
All MRI data were acquired at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center MR Research Center using a 1.5 T GE Signa scanner (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, LX Version). A 3D volumetric spoiled gradient recalled acquisition (SPGR) sequence was obtained covering the whole brain (TE/TR = 5/25 msec, flip angle = 40°, NEX = 1, slice thickness = 1.5 mm/0 mm interslice gap). Images were acquired with an in-plane acquisition matrix of 256 × 256 × 124 image elements, 250 × 250 mm2 field of view and an in-plane voxel size of 0.98 mm.
Scans were corrected for intensity nonuniformities and linearly registered to the International Consortium for Brain Mapping standard brain image template (ICBM-53) [Mazziotta et al., 2001] using a nine-parameter registration to account for global position and scale differences across individuals, including head size [Hua et al., 2008a]. Globally aligned images were re-sampled in an isotropic space of 220 voxels along each axis (x, y, and z) with a final voxel size of 1 mm3.
The minimal deformation template (MDT), or “average” brain image, was created from the MRI scans of 40 cognitively normal CHS subjects to enable automated image registration, reduce statistical bias, and to optimize detection of statistically significant effects [Hua et al., 2008a]. The template was designed to be an unbiased representation of the sample. Equal numbers of men (N = 20) and women (N = 20) were included in the MDT group. There was no statistical difference (P = 0.18) in the age of the subjects used in the MDT (77.3 ± 2.7 SD years of age) relative to the other subjects in the sample (77.9 ± 3.6 SD years of age).
All scans were nonlinearly aligned to the study-specific template so that they would all share a common coordinate system. The local expansion factor of the 3D elastic warping transform, known as the Jacobian determinant, was plotted for each subject. These 3D Jacobian maps show relative volume differences between each individual and the common template, and reveal areas of structural volume deficits, or expansions (e.g., in the ventricles), relative to the healthy population average. Associations between education, physical activity, BMI, and regional brain volumes were evaluated at each voxel using the general linear model, across the whole brain and in specific lobar regions (temporal lobe masks).
The CHS-MDT template was manually parcellated by a trained neuroanatomist using the Brainsuite software program (http://brainsuite.usc.edu/) to generate binary masks for temporal lobes. The manual delineation protocol was the same as that used in previously published studies [Hua et al., 2008b; Stein et al., 2010]. A trained neuroanatomist performed manual parcellation of the temporal lobe masks, blind to subject information. The temporal lobe region of interest (ROI) mask is based on the International Consortium for Brain Mapping standard brain image template (ICBM-53) [Mazziotta et al., 2001], the same template used to align the MDT.
The following protocol was used to delineate the temporal lobe beginning laterally in the sagittal view, but consulting three planes of section in a triaxial display. From the most anterior point, the Sylvian fissure was traced to the peak of its middle segment (before its ascending segment), continuing horizontally to the most posterior point. Once the temporooccipital incisure appeared, the Sylvian fissure was traced to its middle segment peak, followed horizontally across to the lateral occipital sulcus, and then angled downward to the temporo-occipital incisure. When the insular cortex appeared, the Sylvian fissure was traced to its middle segment peak, excluding the insular cortex, and following a line to the lateral occipital sulcus and angled downward to the temporo-occipital incisure. Once the temporo-occipital incisure was no longer visible, the posterior collateral sulcus was used to delineate the mask border. When the lateral occipital sulcus was no longer visible, the middle segment of the Sylvian fissure was followed directly to the collateral sulcus. When the Sylvian fissure and insular cortex were no longer visible, the superior temporal gyrus was traced to the top body of the hippocampus and angled downward to the posterior transverse collateral sulcus. Once the calcarine sulcus appeared, the superior temporal gyrus was followed from the head to the body of the hippocampus and then across to the calcarine sulcus to the most inferior point. Once the head of the hippocampus was detached from the parahippocampal gyrus, the head of the hippocampus was traced. From the most interior point of the lateral ventricle, a horizontal line was traced to the parieto-occipital sulcus, including all regions inferior to this boundary, anterior and superior to the parieto-occipital sulcus, and posterior to the posterior border of the pulvinar. When the corpus callosum appeared, a line was traced from the corpus callosum to the parieto-occipital sulcus, including all regions inferior to this border and anterior to the parieto-occipital sulcus, posterior to the corpus callosum, until reaching the interhemispheric fissure shown clearly in the sagittal view.
At each voxel, partial correlations were computed between the Jacobian values (which represent brain tissue deficit or excess relative to the standard template) and educational level, after controlling for age, sex, and physical activity. Similarly, correlations were computed between physical activity and Jacobian values controlling for age, sex, and educational level. All correlation maps were corrected for multiple comparisons using the widely used false discovery rate (FDR) method [Benjamini, 1995]. The FDR method assigns overall significance values to each statistical map (of correlations), based on the expected proportions of voxels with statistics exceeding any given threshold under the null hypothesis [Benjamini, 1995]. Age, sex, and years of education were separately regressed against brain volume; all covariates were significant, with sex being the most highly correlated with individual differences in brain volume, as we have reported previously in independent samples of younger adults [Brun et al., 2009].
Partial correlations were computed at every voxel between Jacobian values and BMI controlling for age, sex, and educational level, since BMI differed across educational groups (Table III).
Our study had three main findings: (1) higher educational level and greater physical activity were associated with greater brain volumes (Figs. 1 and and2),2), (2) BMI differed significantly across educational levels (Table III: r(226) = −0.145, P = 0.029) and across the quintiles of physical activity (Table III: r(226) = −0.233, P < 0.001) and (3) BMI accounted for variance in brain structure (Fig. 3) even after accounting for the effects of physical activity and education (Fig. 3, bottom panel).
In a region-of-interest analysis, each increment in educational level (completion of some high school, high school, some college, college, and professional school) was associated with 2–3% greater average tissue volumes in the temporal lobe gray matter after controlling for age, sex, and physical activity (Fig. 1; FDR q = 0.05, critical uncorrected P = 0.0046). We used a standard FDR correction for multiple statistical comparisons across voxels in the brain, at the conventionally accepted level of q = 0.05, which means that only 5% of the voxels shown in the thresholded statistical maps are expected to be false positives. Regression coefficient (unstandardized beta value) maps are shown only for statistically significant regions, estimating the average percent brain tissue increase for each increment in educational level completed. Dark blue colors represent an average 3% greater brain tissue volume for each level of education completed, and lighter blue and cyan colors represent a 2.5% and 2% greater regional brain volume, respectively. There were no regions where greater educational level was significantly associated with lower brain volumes. Our results do show, however, that greater educational level was statistically associated with higher volumes in some brain regions.
Each increment in physical activity (categorized in quintiles) was associated with a ~2–2.5% greater average tissue volume, after controlling for age, sex, and education. The statistical effects of physical activity were detected in the white matter of the corona radiata extending into the parietal-occipital junction (Fig. 2; FDR q = 0.05, critical uncorrected P = 0.0002). Significant regression coefficients (unstandardized beta values) are represented as the % increment in average brain tissue for each quintile of physical activity. Increased physical activity is positively associated with greater average brain tissue volumes (about 2–2.5% more brain tissue per quintile of physical activity). Dark blue colors represent an average 2.5% brain tissue increase for each quintile of physical activity, and cyan colors represent a 2% brain volume increase, respectively. There were no regions where greater educational level was significantly associated with decreased brain volume.
BMI statistically differed across educational groups (Table III: r(226) = −0.145, P = 0.029) and across quintiles of physical activity (Table III: r(226) = −0.233, P < 0.001). Since BMI and exercise were highly correlated, we examined whether BMI might be a contributing factor and created maps correlating BMI and brain structure. 3D maps relating BMI and brain structure in 226 subjects from the CHS cohort showed significantly lower brain volumes (Fig. 3: top panel, FDR q = 0.05, critical uncorrected P = 0.0201) after controlling for age, sex, and educational level. We also examined the effects of BMI after correcting for the effects of age, sex, and physical activity and found brain a similar pattern of brain atrophy (Fig. 3: middle panel, FDR q = 0.05, critical uncorrected P = 0.0194). Every one unit increase in BMI was associated with a ~1–1.5% lower brain volume in many of the same brain regions, controlling for age and sex. These included the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobe regions. Atrophy was also detected in the brain stem and cerebellar regions in both cohorts.
We included BMI in the model to determine whether the effects of education and physical activity on brain structure could also be attributable to differences in BMI, which was not adjusted for in prior studies. When physical activity, educational level, and BMI were included in the same model, BMI was the only variable that was statistically associated with brain structure (Fig. 3: bottom panel, FDR q = 0.05, critical uncorrected P = 0.0189). There were no brain regions whose volumes were statistically correlated with educational level after controlling for age, sex, physical activity, and BMI (results not shown). Similarly, physical activity was no longer statistically correlated with brain structure once BMI was included in the model, and after also controlling for age, sex, and educational level (results not shown). The brain regions significantly correlated with BMI (Fig. 3) are consistent when accounting for the variance due to physical activity, education, or both.
This is one of the first neuroimaging studies to map the effects of education and physical activity on brain structure. Higher educational levels and greater physical activity were associated with greater regional brain volumes on MRI in healthy elderly subjects. However, we had previously shown an inverse association between BMI and regional brain volumes [Raji et al., 2010]. When accounting for BMI in this study, the effects of exercise and education were equally explainable as a statistical effect of BMI. There are several possible explanations. First, because BMI is highly correlated with both education and exercise, it is to be expected that covarying for BMI will attenuate, or completely remove, the effects of education and exercise in predicting brain atrophy. A hypothetical diagram (Fig. 4) may be used as a possible explanation for how BMI, physical activity, and education may account for differences in brain structure.
Education and physical activity may have beneficial effects on brain structure, and these may work, in part, by reducing obesity. That is, educated individuals who engage in regular physical activity may have higher brain volumes precisely because they are less likely to be overweight or obese. A combination of high-fat diet and low exercise (along with other genetic and environmental factors) contribute to both obesity and increased vascular burden to the brain, which are thought to accelerate age-related atrophy [Raji et al., 2010]. Our data provide further evidence that factors (e.g., education, physical activity, diet, and BMI) may predict brain structure; however, determining the independent effects of each factor on brain structure is difficult because they are all highly correlated with one another in cross-sectional studies (Fig. 4); this could be overcome, to some extent, with an interventional design where one factor is deliberately manipulated.
We also tested whether educational attainment was associated with brain atrophy in old age [Christensen et al., 2007]. In nondemented subjects, some studies support an effect of education on brain atrophy [Coffey et al., 1999; Dufouil et al., 2003; Staff et al., 2004], but others do not [Christensen et al., 2007; Kidron et al., 1997].
Prior epidemiological studies suggest that low educational attainment is correlated with increased risk for developing dementia, including AD [Katzman, 1993]. Since AD pathology follows a characteristic atrophic pattern, with its earliest effects in the temporal lobe region [Braak and Braak, 1991; Thompson et al., 2003], we were interested in the effects of education on brain structure within the temporal lobes. To apply our analysis to this ROI, the temporal lobe ROI mask was identified (see Methods for details on mask boundaries).
In one study of healthy individuals, education was positively correlated with frontal white matter volume, after controlling for physical activity [Gordon et al., 2008], and higher levels of formal education related to a lesser occurrence of WMH. In our sample, educational level was correlated with greater temporal lobe volume, after controlling for physical activity (Fig. 1). Even so, WMH burden was not different among groups with different educational level (Table I; P = 0.534). Differences between these studies may be due to the greater sample size in our study (N = 226) versus Gordon et al. (N = 40), our measures of physical activity (kcal/week) versus fitness level (VO2max), and our quantification of educational level (i.e., some high school, completed high school, some college, completed college, completed professional school) versus years of education completed. Other causal factors may be associated with educational level, such as socioeconomic status and occupation.
Here, energy expenditure data was divided into quintiles since physical activity data in elderly populations tends to be heavily skewed and follow a non-normal distribution. Prior studies have resolved this distributional issue by binning physical activity data into quartiles [Yaffe et al., 2001] or quintiles [Weuve et al., 2004]. Here, physical activity levels were based on quintiles since educational level was also divided into five groups. However, we also analyzed the physical activity data based on quartiles, and found that physical activity remained significantly associated with brain structure (FDR q = 0.05, critical uncorrected P = 0.0007).
Currently, it is unknown whether physical activity is responsible for differences in brain structure; however, animal studies suggest that physical activity is a positive factor in maintaining brain structure. In animals, physical activity increases neurogenesis, cell survival, hippocampus-dependent spatial learning [van Praag et al., 1999], expression of other neurotrophic factors such as BDNF and IGF-1 [Carro et al., 2001; Neeper et al., 1995], and brain plasticity [Cotman and Berchtold, 2002]. The observed correlation in this study does not necessarily imply a causal effect of exercise on brain structure; people who engage in greater physical activity may also tend to avoid activities that harm brain structure, or they may simply be in better health than those who exercise less, or not at all. Even so, all subjects in this study were cognitively normal and in good health.
In addition to prior animal studies, a number of human studies using both interventional [Colcombe et al., 2006; Pereira et al., 2007] and cross-sectional approaches [Peters et al., 2009] have also suggested that physical activity, or cardiovascular fitness, accounts for differences in brain structure; however, these studies did not control for effects of BMI. Our results relating physical activity and brain structure (Fig. 2) are consistent with prior studies that did not account for the potential effects of BMI. Prior reports [Bugg and Head, 2009; Colcombe et al., 2003; Colcombe et al., 2006; Erickson et al., 2007] suggest that exercise has a role in reducing age-related atrophy, but BMI was not reported in these studies, making it difficult to assess whether it might explain the relationship between exercise, or physical activity, and brain structure.
Physical activity is also associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes [Mozaffarian et al., 2009], coronary heart disease [Siscovick et al., 1997], incidence of atrial fibrillation [Mozaffarian et al., 2008], and inflammatory markers [Geffken et al., 2001]. In an elderly sample also from the CHS, Siscovick et al.  found that exercise intensity was associated with a favorable coronary disease risk factor profile [Siscovick et al., 1997].
The effects of BMI on brain structure are consistent with past studies linking higher BMI to smaller regional brain volumes [Gustafson et al., 2004; Pannacciulli et al., 2006; Raji et al., 2010; Taki et al., 2008]. BMI is correlated with lower brain volume in the temporal and parietal lobes—brain regions where volumes are significantly correlated with education (Fig. 1) and physical activity (Fig. 2). While it is difficult to assess the independent effects of these factors, our data suggests that similar to education and physical activity, BMI also accounts for variance in brain volume (Fig. 3).
One plausible interpretation is that higher physical activity and educational level lead to better vascular health and consequently a relatively preserved brain volume. In this cohort, BMI was highly correlated with education and physical, suggesting that BMI is likely a consequence of greater energy expenditure through physical activity, higher educational attainment, and better overall vascular health (Fig. 4). Under this interpretation, greater physical activity leads to better vascular health, to relatively preserved brain volumes and to lower BMI, and consequently, brain structure and BMI variables track each other and are highly correlated. This interpretation offers a possible reason why physical activity is linked to greater brain volume, but because physical activity tends to be correlated with BMI, the statistical effects of physical activity on the brain are no longer observed when statistical adjustments are made for BMI. Similarly, higher education itself does not cause lower BMI, but may be an indicator variable for other socio-demographic factors that may be linked to greater educational achievement (e.g., higher income, better health care, and improved diet). Exercise and education may exert an additional direct effect on brain structure independent of BMI (green arrows). Our current study does not provide evidence for this, but evidence for this might be obtained in a randomized clinical trial that deliberately holds one factor constant and varies the other.
Alternatively, and perhaps controversially, it may be that physical activity has no detectable effect on brain structure, in subjects with the same BMI. Instead, dietary factors may affect BMI, and BMI may in turn affect a person’s physical activity level. Under this interpretation, dietary factors (e.g., fat content and overall calorie intake) may be the most relevant causal factors influencing BMI and brain structure; higher BMI may deter individuals from engaging in physical activity, either through reduced motivation, or physical difficulty in exercising. Under this more extreme interpretation, diet and BMI may be the most relevant causal factors influencing brain volume, and physical activity may be merely an epiphenomenon.
This study has several limitations. Causal effects of physical activity on brain structure are only detectable using a longitudinal neuroimaging approach, ideally in a randomized clinical trial [Heyn et al., 2004]. A preselected subpopulation with a very narrow range of BMI could also be studied, to avoid the confounding effects of the naturally occurring correlation between BMI and physical activity.
Our study is also limited as we relied on self-reported measures of physical activity. The reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Activity Questionnaire has been comprehensively validated, but the reliability of determining low-to-moderate levels of activity has been identified as an area that needs improvement [Richardson et al., 1994]. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) or lactate threshold are cardiovascular fitness measures that have been used in prior studies [Colcombe et al., 2003, 2006; Ruscheweyh et al., 2009], and may be more objective assessments of physical activity level. Further, many studies have used both self-reported measures of physical activity, using a validated questionnaire or by computing a physical activity score corresponding to metabolic equivalent (MET), as well as objective assessments including the ergometer test, lactate step test, or measures of peak oxygen uptake. Another limitation is the cross-sectional nature of this study. This could be improved in future studies with serial MRI, using corresponding measures of physical activity to better relate deliberate alterations in physical activity to rates of brain atrophy over time.
In 2000, only 3% of Americans reported a healthy lifestyle (i.e., regular physical activity, nonsmoking, daily diet including five or more serving of fruit/vegetables, and a healthy BMI (18.5–25) [Reeves and Rafferty, 2005]. Understanding how physical activity, diet, education, and obesity affect brain health may help to identify lifestyle interventions to slow or delay age-related brain deterioration.
A full list of participating CHS investigators and institutions is available at www.chs-nhlbi.org.
Contract grant sponsor: NIBIB; Contract grant numbers: R01 EB007813, R01 EB008281, R01 EB008432; Contract grant sponsor: NICHD; Contract grant number: R01 HD050735; Contract grant sponsor: NIA; Contract grant number: R01 AG020098; Contract grant sponsor: National Institutes of Health through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research; Contract grant number: U54-RR021813; Contract grant sponsor: National Institute of Aging; Contract grant numbers: AG20098, AG05133, AG15928; Contract grant sponsor: American Heart Association Pre-doctoral Grant; Contract grant number: 0815465D; Contract grant sponsors: NITP (Neuroimaging Training Program), ARCS, and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.