PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 1, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. Jun 2011; 7(2): 121–127.
doi:  10.1007/s11888-011-0090-5
PMCID: PMC3184527
NIHMSID: NIHMS291274
NOTCH Signaling and ATOH1 in Colorectal Cancers
Avedis Kazanjiancorresponding author and Noah F. Shroyercorresponding author
Avedis Kazanjian, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, MLC 2010, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA;
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Avedis Kazanjian: avedis.kazanjian/at/cchmc.org; Noah F. Shroyer: noah.shroyer/at/cchmc.org
The Notch receptor signaling pathway regulates expression of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor ATOH1 (Math1/Hath1) to determine cell fate in the intestine. In differentiating intestinal stem cells, high levels of Notch activity specify absorptive enterocyte/colonocyte differentiation, whereas high ATOH1 activity specifies secretory (goblet, enteroendocrine, and Paneth) cell differentiation. In colorectal cancer, ATOH1 is a tumor suppressor that is silenced in most tumors, while Notch is oncogenic and often highly active in human tumors. In other gastrointestinal malignancies with features of intestinal metaplasia, such as esophageal and gastric cancers, the Notch-ATOH1 pathway becomes activated. In cancers and preneoplastic tissues that retain the ability to activate ATOH1, therapeutic targeting of this pathway can be achieved by inhibiting Notch activity (with Notch-targeting antibodies or small-molecule inhibitors of γ-secretase). Thus, targeting the Notch-ATOH1 pathway represents a novel approach to differentiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancers.
Keywords: Notch, Delta-like, Jagged, Atoh1, Math1, Hath1, γ-secretase, Intestine, Colon, Crypts of Lieberkühn, Stem cell, Cancer, Differentiation
Molecular pathways that regulate development and homeostasis of the adult intestinal epithelium are frequently misregulated in intestinal cancers and represent potential targets for new therapeutics. The Notch-Atoh1 signaling pathway is key to determining self-renewal versus differentiation of intestinal stem cells. The Notch-Atoh1 pathway has emerged as an important regulator of colorectal cancer (CRC) and thus represents a potential therapeutic target that could prove valuable in our fight against CRC. Here we will review the current model of cell fate determination that is controlled by the Notch-Atoh1 pathway, contribution of this pathway to gastrointestinal cancers, and its impact on therapeutic approaches that utilize Notch as a molecular target.
The intestinal epithelium is a dynamic self-renewing tissue that consists of multiple cell lineages that are actively and constantly renewed throughout the life of the organism. The crypts of Lieberkühn are the proliferative compartment of the intestine with stem cells residing near the base of colonic crypts. The stem cells give rise to rapidly proliferating transit-amplifying cells that differentiate into three main types of cells: colonocytes (enterocytes in the small intestine), goblet, and enteroendocrine cells. Paneth cells constitute the fourth major cell type that reside adjacent to stem cells at the base of small intestinal crypts. These major cell types are classified either as absorptive (colonocytes or enterocytes) or secretory (goblet, Paneth, and enteroendocrine cells), reflecting distinct genetic programs underlying differentiation of each class.
Notch Signaling is Essential for Making the Lineage Fate Decisions for Developing Epithelial Cells to Become Either an Absorptive or a Secretory Cell Notch proteins (Notch1, 2, 3, and 4) are type I transmembrane receptors which require cleavage for their activation. When bound by ligands (Delta-like 1, 2, 3 and Jagged 1 and 2 proteins) on adjacent cells, the Notch receptors undergo cleavage at the extracellular and intracellular faces of the plasma membrane to release the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) [1]. Cleavage of Notch occurs first on the extracellular side by the disintegrin and metalloproteinases ADAM10/ADAM17, which allows subsequent cleavage at the intracellular side by the γ-secretase complex to release NICD. NICD subsequently translocates to the nucleus, where it displaces transcriptional repressors and recruits transcriptional activators to convert the CSL (RBPJ) complex from transcriptional repression to activation (Fig. 1a). In the adult intestine, Notch1 and Notch2 are expressed in the crypt epithelium, and ligands Dll1, Dll4, and Jag1 are expressed in scattered cells within the crypts [2]. Studies of transgenic animals expressing NICD in the intestinal epithelium found altered intestinal secretory cell production [3, 4]. Conversely, genetic models that selectively delete Notch1 and Notch2 or its DNA-binding partner, CSL (Rbpj), in the intestinal epithelium of mice, produce extra intestinal secretory cells [5•, 6, 7]. Similar effects were observed in transgenic mice in which Notch activity was modified by other genetic manipulations. Loss of Notch activity and conversion of progenitors to secretory cells was observed in animals with defective glycosylation of Notch, caused either by mutation of the fucosyl transferase POFUT1 or by mutation of the enzyme responsible for fucose synthesis (FX), or by mutation of Mindbomb1, a protein essential for endocytosis of Notch ligands and efficient Notch activation [810]. Importantly, conversion of progenitors to secretory cells was also observed when animals are treated with small-molecule inhibitors of γ-secretase (GSIs), which prevent ligand-induced cleavage of Notch and production of NICD (Fig. 1a) [1113]. Altered cellular differentiation was also shown in zebrafish and fruit flies with abnormal Notch signaling [14, 15]. Thus, Notch activity has been shown to promote differentiation of intestinal absorptive cells and to block differentiation of intestinal secretory cells.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of the role of NOTCH and ATOH1 in intestinal differentiation and carcinogenesis. a Notch signaling is activated upon engagement of the Notch receptor by its ligand (delta/serrate/lag-2 ligands; DSL) on an adjacent cell. Upon ligand (more ...)
Notch Selects Hes1 Versus Atoh1 in the Intestinal Epithelium Hes1 (hairy and enhancer of split 1, a basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional repressor), a key target of Notch transcriptional activity, is important for differentiation of the intestinal absorptive cells. Hes1-null mice develop too many goblet, Paneth, and enteroendocrine cells, at the expense of absorptive enterocytes [16, 17]. Atoh1 (atonal homolog 1, also called Math1 or HATH1, a basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional activator) is transcriptionally repressed by Hes1, and plays a reciprocal role to positively promote secretory lineage differentiation (Fig. 1a). Atoh1-null mice fail to form any secretory cell types and mice die shortly after birth [18]. Intestine-specific Atoh1 knockout mice, which used the mosaic Fabp-cre strain to produce a crypt-by-crypt mosaic of Atoh1-null and adjacent wild-type tissue, demonstrated that Atoh1 is essential for intestinal secretory cell commitment in the adult intestine, with epithelial progenitors undergoing a secretory-to-absorptive fate switch [19]. Conversely, transgenic Atoh1 overexpression converts progenitor cells into the secretory fate [20]. Together, these studies show that Atoh1 and Notch play opposing roles in promoting secretory versus absorptive intestinal epithelial cell types. Thus, the relative activity of Notch versus Atoh1 determines whether an intestinal progenitor adopts an absorptive (Notch active) or secretory (Atoh1 active) fate (Fig. 1a).
Mechanisms by which Notch and ATOH1 transcriptional activity are reciprocally regulated remain an area of investigation. Notch receptors are active in epithelial progenitor cells including the intestinal stem cells, which require Notch activity for their maintenance [6, 7, 21]. Delta-like ligands Dll1 and Dll4 are expressed by goblet and Paneth cells, likely under the control of ATOH1 [22, 23•, 24], whereas the expression pattern of Jagged ligands Jag1 and Jag2 is less clear, but is likely regulated by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [2, 22, 25, 26•, 27]. Thus, in the intestinal crypt, the level of Notch ligand exposure of intestinal stem and progenitor cells is likely to be critical for determining stem cell renewal or differentiation into absorptive or secretory lineage cells. However, in the absence of ATOH1, Notch activity is dispensable for stem cell renewal, proliferation, and absorptive cell differentiation [23•], suggesting that the key role for Notch is to regulate expression of ATOH1 and consequently cell fate.
The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is also involved in regulating ATOH1 expression. GSK3-βcan phosphorylate ATOH1 and target it for ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome (Fig. 1b) [28, 29•]. This targeted degradation appears reciprocal to the involvement of GSK3-βin the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. When the Wnt pathway is inactive, β-catenin is phosphorylated by GSK3-βand targeted for degradation by the Axin/APC complex (Fig. 1a). In this context, ATOH1 escapes GSK3-βphosphorylation and is spared from degradation [29•, 30]. Upon Wnt/β-catenin pathway stimulation, the APC/Axin complex is disrupted and β-catenin escapes phosphorylation and degradation; in this context, GSK3-βphosphorylates and targets ATOH1 for degradation (Fig. 1b). Several genes have been identified as transcriptional targets of both active Notch and β-catenin, including Hes1 (Fig. 1b), which in turn transcriptionally represses ATOH1 [26•, 30]. Together, the Notch and Wnt pathways use several mechanisms to regulate ATOH1 expression to control cell fate determination within the intestinal epithelium. A more complete understanding of how crosstalk between the Notch and Wnt pathways impacts intestinal homeostasis as well as tumorigenesis requires further investigation.
Notch pathway activation is known to be procarcinogenic in many organ systems [31]. Increasing evidence supports the involvement of Notch signaling in colorectal carcinogenesis. NOTCH1 and NOTCH2, as well as JAGGED ligands and HES1, are expressed in human colon adenocarcinomas and colorectal cancer cell lines [25, 30, 32, 33, 34•]. Active Notch and its transcriptional target Hes1 are also enriched in adenomas from APC mutant mice [6, 7, 25, 30, 34•]. Overexpression of NICD in APC mutant mice enhanced tumorigenesis [34•], whereas deletion of one allele of Jag1 reduced tumor formation [26•]. The mechanism by which Notch is activated in colon cancer remains undefined. However, the E3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for targeting NICD for degradation, FBW7, is frequently mutated in colon cancer [35]; mutation of Fbw7 enhanced tumor formation in mice, likely via a Notch-dependent mechanism (Fig. 1a and b) [36]. Given the ascribed gatekeeper role for Notch signaling in proliferation and differentiation of the intestinal epithelium, a contributory role for Notch signaling in colorectal tumorigenesis is likely.
Additional evidence supporting a potential role for Notch signaling involvement in intestinal tumorigenesis came from the treatment of APCmin/+ mice with γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs). This treatment resulted in reduced proliferation, Atoh1 overexpression, and differentiation of some adenoma cells to nonproliferating goblet cells [6]. More recently, GSI treatment was shown to quantitatively shrink adenomas in APCmin/+ mice [37]. Experiments in CRC cell lines showed a minimal effect of GSI alone in general; however, a subset of cell lines that can potentially respond to GSI treatment were also identified (discussed further below). Nonetheless, a significant proapoptotic effect of GSI on CRC cell lines was observed when given alone [33] or in combination with cytotoxic drugs such as taxanes or platinum compounds [38, 39]. In addition to GSIs, antibody-mediated inhibition of NOTCH1 blocked growth of CRC cells with less effect on normal intestinal differentiation [40]. Thus, Notch signaling represents a potential target for antitumor therapy of colorectal cancer.
Regulation of Atoh1 by Notch signaling is well described in intestinal development and adult epithelial homeostasis. Atoh1 expression opposes Notch function and commits cells to differentiate into secretory cells. In accordance with the contributory role of Notch in tumorigenesis, a definitive tumor suppressor function has been described for ATOH1 in CRCs [28, 41••, 42]. Analysis in human colon tumor cell lines and primary tumors showed a significant decrease of ATOH1 expression in approximately 70% of CRCs, with significantly lower expression in carcinomas compared to adenomas [28, 41••]. Examining the mechanism of ATOH1 silencing with gene copy number analysis demonstrated at least one deletion in approximately 50% of tumors, but sequencing did not identify point mutations. Additional DNA methylation analysis of the CpG island encompassing the ATOH1 transcription start site and coding region showed ATOH1 CpG methylation in approximately 70% of tumors (Fig. 1b) [41••]. These data showed that ATOH1 is frequently silenced in CRC by both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms.
Forced expression of ATOH1 in the CRC cell line HT-29 inhibited proliferation and growth in soft agar and xenografts [28]. Further evidence of the antiproliferative tumor suppressor function of Atoh1 was determined in animal models. Intestine-specific deletion of Atoh1 in mice (Atoh1Δintestine) was used in several mouse models of CRC. Treating Atoh1Δintestine mice with azoxymethane, a chemical carcinogen that induces colonic tumors, showed a significant enhancement of tumorigenesis in Atoh1Δintestine mice compared to wild-type littermates. Similar analyses showed a significantly greater tumor burden in the colons of Atoh1Δintestine; APCmin/+ double-mutant mice compared to APCmin/+ mice [41••]. Enhanced tumor formation was also observed upon acute deletion of Atoh1 and APC, supporting the concept that silencing of Atoh1 augments early tumor formation [30]. Increased colitis-associated tumorigenesis was also observed in Atoh1Δintestine mice (our unpublished data). Together, these data firmly establish Atoh1 as a tumor suppressor, and also provide a robust colonic tumorigenesis model in mice.
The relationship between Atoh1 and Notch in colon tumors was illuminated by GSI studies. Initially, GSI treatment of APCmin/+ adenomas showed reduced proliferation, increased Atoh1 expression, and differentiation of cells into postmitotic goblet cells [6]. In fact, re-expression of Atoh1 in adenomas is the key molecular event underlying the effect of γ-secretase inhibitors on tumors. The role of Atoh1 in response to GSIs in tumorigenesis was determined in Atoh1Δintestine; APCmin double-mutant mice compared to APCmin/+ neoplasms. Tumors lacking Atoh1 showed no response to GSI treatment, with no reduction in proliferation nor differentiation into secretory goblet cells [23•]. These data indicate that a diametric relationship between Notch and Atoh1 occurs both in normal differentiation and in tumorigenesis, where Notch is oncogenic and Atoh1 is tumor suppressive.
Consistent with these findings in mouse models of colon cancer, the ability of CRC cell lines to respond to GSI-induced Notch inhibition was Atoh1 dependent. CRC cells such as LS174T and HT29 Cl16E, which retained the ability to upregulate ATOH1, respond to GSI treatment with a significant decrease in proliferation and upregulation of secretory (goblet) cell markers [23•, 25]. However, CRC cells that have lost the ability to express ATOH1, such as by deletion or methylation (as discussed above for human colon tumors), show no effect of GSI treatment on proliferation or differentiation [23•]. Loss of APC has been associated with degradation of ATOH1, suggesting another level of regulation of ATOH1 in CRCs. Restoring ATOH1 in the context of CRC cells with mutant APC blocked xenograft growth [28]. These findings suggest that patients whose tumors have silenced ATOH1 may be refractory to Notch or γ-secretase inhibitor therapy, whereas patients whose tumors retain ATOH1 expression are the best candidates for such treatments.
Finally, in contrast to the tumor suppressor function described for ATOH1 in most colon adenocarcinomas, ATOH1 might have a different role in colorectal cancers that retain prominent secretory cell components, such as mucinous adenocarcinomas, signet ring carcinomas, and intestinal neuroendocrine tumors [42, 43]. In these tumors, as well as in adenomatous tumors that have silenced ATOH1, identification of the transcriptional targets of ATOH1 which can enforce cell cycle arrest may provide candidates for new cancer therapies. One such target, SPDEF, was shown to efficiently halt proliferation and induce goblet cell differentiation in normal intestinal epithelium [44]. Determining whether SPDEF can function as a tumor suppressor in vivo, and how it could be activated in human cancers, is an area of current investigation.
The Notch-Atoh1 pathway has also been described in gastric tumor cells. Notch receptors (1, 2, and 3) and the downstream target Hes1 have been shown to be expressed on normal gastric mucosa, whereas Atoh1 expression is undetectable [4547]. Similarly, gastric cancer cell lines retain their Notch receptors (1, 2, and 3) and Hes1 expression. However, in contrast to the normal mucosa, ATOH1 is expressed in some of these cell lines and its expression correlates with intestinal mucin production (intestinal metaplasia) [46, 47]. In vitro analysis showed that ATOH1 transcriptionally regulates mucin genes such as MUC6 and MUC5AC, similar to ATOH1 regulation of MUC2 described in CRC cells [28, 47]. Moreover, ATOH1 expression was observed both in mouse and human metaplastic mucosa [46].
Similar to neoplasias of the stomach, the Notch-ATOH1 pathway has also been described in the pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) [48, 49]. Reflux of bile acids induces intestinal metaplasia characterized by goblet cell production—a hallmark of BE, which is the premalignant lesion of EAC. GSI treatment of EAC cell lines, as well as a rat model of reflux-induced BE, achieves the same effects via the Notch-Atoh1 pathway as it does in the intestine, namely forced differentiation into postmitotic goblet cells and loss of proliferation [48, 49, 50••]. Although the role of ATOH1 in these lesions has not been well characterized and no specific role in tumorigenesis has been described, we suggest that GSI treatment of gastric and esophageal intestinal metaplasias or cancers which can express ATOH1 will result in forced differentiation and loss of proliferation. Thus, targeting the Notch-ATOH1 pathway represents a novel approach to differentiation therapy in GI cancers.
During differentiation of the intestinal epithelium, the relative activity of Notch versus ATOH1 determines whether an intestinal progenitor adopts an absorptive (Notch active) or secretory (ATOH1 active) fate. In CRC, several mechanisms work to skew the normal Notch-ATOH1 balance to favor Notch activation. These mechanisms include silencing of ATOH1, stabilization of Notch, and activation of Notch ligands (eg, Jagged1). Gain of Notch activity and/or loss of ATOH1 activity enhances tumorigenesis; thus, Notch functions as an oncogene whereas ATOH1 functions as a tumor suppressor in CRC. However, the specific mechanisms by which Notch and ATOH1 activities function in cancer remain unknown. The Notch-ATOH1 pathway is active in other GI malignancies with features of intestinal metaplasia (eg, esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric carcinoma). Therapeutic targeting of the Notch-ATOH1 pathway can be achieved by inhibiting Notch activation with γ-secretase inhibitors or Notch-directed antibodies. However, this approach is dependent on ATOH1 expression and is therefore likely to benefit a subset of patients with GI malignancies.
Acknowledgments
Supported by NIH grants R01 CA142826 and R03 DK084167.
Footnotes
Disclosure No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Contributor Information
Avedis Kazanjian, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, MLC 2010, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Noah F. Shroyer, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, MLC 2010, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA, Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:
• Of importance
•• Of major importance
1. Bray SJ. Notch signalling: a simple pathway becomes complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(9):678–89. [PubMed]
2. Schroder N, Gossler A. Expression of Notch pathway components in fetal and adult mouse small intestine. Gene Expr Patterns. 2002;2(3–4):247–50. [PubMed]
3. Zecchini V, Domaschenz R, Winton D, Jones P. Notch signaling regulates the differentiation of post-mitotic intestinal epithelial cells. Genes Dev. 2005;19(14):1686–91. [PubMed]
4. Stanger BZ, Datar R, Murtaugh LC, Melton DA. Direct regulation of intestinal fate by Notch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102 (35):12443–8. [PubMed]
5•. Riccio O, van Gijn ME, Bezdek AC, et al. Loss of intestinal crypt progenitor cells owing to inactivation of both Notch1 and Notch2 is accompanied by derepression of CDK inhibitors p27Kip1 and p57Kip2. EMBO Rep. 2008;9(4):377–83. This article demonstrated that Notch1 and Notch2 are the key Notch receptors in the intestinal epithelium. It showed that the Notch target Hes1 directly represses p27 and p57 to control proliferation. [PubMed]
6. van Es JH, van Gijn ME, Riccio O, et al. Notch/gamma-secretase inhibition turns proliferative cells in intestinal crypts and adenomas into goblet cells. Nature. 2005;435(7044):959–63. [PubMed]
7. Vooijs M, Ong CT, Hadland B, et al. Mapping the consequence of Notch1 proteolysis in vivo with NIP-CRE. Development. 2007;134(3):535–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Guilmeau S, Flandez M, Bancroft L, et al. Intestinal deletion of Pofut1 in the mouse inactivates notch signaling and causes enterocolitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(3):849–60. 60 e1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Koo BK, Lim HS, Chang HJ, et al. Notch signaling promotes the generation of EphrinB1-positive intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(1):145–55. 55 e1–3. [PubMed]
10. Waterhouse CC, Johnson S, Phillipson M, et al. Secretory cell hyperplasia and defects in Notch activity in a mouse model of leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(3):1079–90. e1–5. [PubMed]
11. Milano J, McKay J, Dagenais C, et al. Modulation of notch processing by gamma-secretase inhibitors causes intestinal goblet cell metaplasia and induction of genes known to specify gut secretory lineage differentiation. Toxicol Sci. 2004;82(1):341–58. [PubMed]
12. Searfoss GH, Jordan WH, Calligaro DO, et al. Adipsin, a biomarker of gastrointestinal toxicity mediated by a functional gamma-secretase inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(46):46107–16. [PubMed]
13. Wong GT, Manfra D, Poulet FM, et al. Chronic treatment with the gamma-secretase inhibitor LY-411, 575 inhibits beta-amyloid peptide production and alters lymphopoiesis and intestinal cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(13):12876–82. [PubMed]
14. Ohlstein B, Spradling A. Multipotent drosophila intestinal stem cells specify daughter cell fates by differential notch signaling. Science. 2007;315(5814):988–92. [PubMed]
15. Crosnier C, Vargesson N, Gschmeissner S, et al. Delta-notch signalling controls commitment to a secretory fate in the zebrafish intestine. Development. 2005;132(5):1093–104. [PubMed]
16. Jensen J, Pedersen EE, Galante P, et al. Control of endodermal endocrine development by Hes-1. Nat Genet. 2000;24(1):36–44. [PubMed]
17. Suzuki K, Fukui H, Kayahara T, et al. Hes1-deficient mice show precocious differentiation of Paneth cells in the small intestine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;328(1):348–52. [PubMed]
18. Yang Q, Bermingham NA, Finegold MJ, Zoghbi HY. Requirement of Math1 for secretory cell lineage commitment in the mouse intestine. Science. 2001;294(5549):2155–8. [PubMed]
19. Shroyer NF, Helmrath MA, Wang VY, et al. Intestine-specific ablation of mouse atonal homolog 1 (Math1) reveals a role in cellular homeostasis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2478–88. [PubMed]
20. Vandussen KL, Samuelson LC. Mouse atonal homolog 1 directs intestinal progenitors to secretory cell rather than absorptive cell fate. Dev Biol. 2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. van Es JH, de Geest N, van de Born M, et al. Intestinal stem cells lacking the Math1 tumour suppressor are refractory to Notch inhibitors. Nat Commun. 2010;1(2):1–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Akiyama J, Okamoto R, Iwasaki M, et al. Delta-like 1 expression promotes goblet cell differentiation in Notch-inactivated human colonic epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;393(4):662–7. [PubMed]
23•. Kazanjian A, Noah T, Brown D, et al. Atonal Homolog 1 is required for growth and differentiation effects of Notch/gamma-secretase inhibitors on normal and cancerous intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 2010 Established Atoh1 as the key target for GSI-mediated Notch effects on proliferation and differentiation of normal and cancerous intestinal epithelial cells. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Sato T, van Es JH, Snippert HJ, et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature. 2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Guilmeau S, Flandez M, Mariadason JM, Augenlicht LH. Heterogeneity of Jagged1 expression in human and mouse intestinal tumors: implications for targeting Notch signaling. Oncogene. 2010;29(7):992–1002. [PubMed]
26•. Rodilla V, Villanueva A, Obrador-Hevia A, et al. Jagged1 is the pathological link between Wnt and Notch pathways in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(15):6315–20. Provides evidence that β-catenin and Notch pathways have coordinate targets that mediate tumorigenesis. JAG1 is a key target for TCF4 effects and it is upregulated (along with NOTCH target/pathway genes) in human tumor samples; reduction of Jag1 inhibited tumor formation in mice. [PubMed]
27. Sander GR, Powell BC. Expression of notch receptors and ligands in the adult gut. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52(4):509–16. [PubMed]
28. Leow CC, Romero MS, Ross S, et al. Hath1, down-regulated in colon adenocarcinomas, inhibits proliferation and tumorigenesis of colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(17):6050–7. [PubMed]
29•. Tsuchiya K, Nakamura T, Okamoto R, et al. Reciprocal targeting of Hath1 and beta-catenin by Wnt glycogen synthase kinase 3beta in human colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(1):208–20. This article demonstrates Wnt/β-catenin pathway regulation of Atoh1 protein stability by GSK3-beta phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation. [PubMed]
30. Peignon G, Durand A, Cacheux W, et al. Complex interplay between {beta}-catenin signalling and Notch effectors in intestinal tumorigenesis. Gut. 2011;60(2):166–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Yin L, Velazquez OC, Liu ZJ. Notch signaling: emerging molecular targets for cancer therapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;80(5):690–701. [PubMed]
32. Reedijk M, Odorcic S, Zhang H, et al. Activation of Notch signaling in human colon adenocarcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2008;33 (6):1223–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Sikandar SS, Pate KT, Anderson S, et al. NOTCH signaling is required for formation and self-renewal of tumor-initiating cells and for repression of secretory cell differentiation in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(4):1469–78. [PubMed]
34•. Fre S, Pallavi SK, Huyghe M, et al. Notch and Wnt signals cooperatively control cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in the intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(15):6309–14. Showed that NICD expression can enhance tumorigenesis in mice. Also showed a requirement of TCF4 for NICD-induced cell proliferation but not for inhibition of goblet cell differentiation. [PubMed]
35. Wood LD, Parsons DW, Jones S, et al. The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2007;318 (5853):1108–13. [PubMed]
36. Sancho R, Jandke A, Davis H, et al. F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7 regulates intestinal cell lineage commitment and is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(3):929–41. [PubMed]
37. Ghaleb AM, Aggarwal G, Bialkowska AB, et al. Notch inhibits expression of the Kruppel-like factor 4 tumor suppressor in the intestinal epithelium. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(12):1920–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Akiyoshi T, Nakamura M, Yanai K, et al. Gamma-secretase inhibitors enhance taxane-induced mitotic arrest and apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(1):131–44. [PubMed]
39. Aleksic T, Feller SM. Gamma-secretase inhibition combined with platinum compounds enhances cell death in a large subset of colorectal cancer cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2008;6:8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Wu Y, Cain-Hom C, Choy L, et al. Therapeutic antibody targeting of individual Notch receptors. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1052–7. [PubMed]
41••. Bossuyt W, Kazanjian A, De Geest N, et al. Atonal homolog 1 is a tumor suppressor gene. PLoS Biol. 2009;7(2):e39. Established Atoh1 as a tumor suppressor and showed deletion and/or methylation of ATOH1 as the mechanism of silencing in primary colorectal cancers. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Park ET, Oh HK, Gum JR, Jr, et al. HATH1 expression in mucinous cancers of the colorectum and related lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(18):5403–10. [PubMed]
43. Heiskala K, Arola J, Heiskala M, Andersson LC. Expression of Reg IV and Hath1 in neuroendocrine neoplasms. Histol Histopathol. 2010;25(1):63–72. [PubMed]
44. Noah TK, Kazanjian A, Whitsett J, Shroyer NF. SAM pointed domain ETS factor (SPDEF) regulates terminal differentiation and maturation of intestinal goblet cells. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316(3):452–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Yeh TS, Wu CW, Hsu KW, et al. The activated Notch1 signal pathway is associated with gastric cancer progression through cyclooxygenase-2. Cancer Res. 2009;69(12):5039–48. [PubMed]
46. Mutoh H, Sakamoto H, Hayakawa H, et al. The intestine-specific homeobox gene Cdx2 induces expression of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Math1. Differentiation. 2006;74(6):313–21. [PubMed]
47. Sekine A, Akiyama Y, Yanagihara K, Yuasa Y. Hath1 up-regulates gastric mucin gene expression in gastric cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;344(4):1166–71. [PubMed]
48. Liu T, Zhang X, So CK, et al. Regulation of Cdx2 expression by promoter methylation, and effects of Cdx2 transfection on morphology and gene expression of human esophageal epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28(2):488–96. [PubMed]
49. Morrow DJ, Avissar NE, Toia L, et al. Pathogenesis of Barrett’s esophagus: bile acids inhibit the Notch signaling pathway with induction of CDX2 gene expression in human esophageal cells. Surgery. 2009;146(4):714–21. discussion 21–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50••. Menke V, van Es JH, de Lau W, et al. Conversion of metaplastic Barrett’s epithelium into post-mitotic goblet cells by gamma-secretase inhibition. Dis Model Mech. 2010;3(1–2):104–10. In this paper, γ-secretase inhibitor treatment activates ATOH1 and converts intestinal metaplastic epithelial cells (Barrett’s esophagus) into non-proliferating, differentiated goblet cells. [PubMed]