Yttrium belongs to group IIIB of the periodic table and has an atomic radius of 2.3 Å and electronegativity of 1.22.
86Y can be produced via the (p,n) or (d,2n) nuclear reaction on enriched
86Sr (
3He,2n) on natural rubidium, (p,3n) on enriched
88Sr, or (d,x) reaction on natural zirconium target [
19,
20]. However, the
86Sr(p,n)
86Y reaction is the more commonly used method as it can be applied on medical cyclotrons by irradiating SrCO
3 or SrO with 2–6 μA of beam current for <4 h [
21,
22]. As compared to SrCO
3, SrO is a superior target because it can withstand at least a 6 μA of beam current, which is a significant improvement over a maximum of 2 μA on the SrCO
3 target, resulting in yields that are almost double with minimum contaminants [
21]. After irradiation,
86Y is separated from the target material using a commercially available Sr(II) selective resin and purified in order to accomplish efficient radiolabeling [
22]. Electrochemical method of separation is also commonly used to produce no-carrier-added
86Y of high purity [
23]. Other separation techniques include the combination of co-precipitation and cation-exchange chromatography and ion specific resin chromatography, or paper filtration from alkaline solution [
18,
19,
24].
Once high purity 86Y is produced, it is then attached to the targeting vector such as an antibody and a peptide via a chelating agent. A chelating agent is a molecule containing more than one ligand or an atom such as N, O and S that can donate a lone pair of electrons. The oxidation state and electronegativity play a major role in the formation of metal-ligand complexes. Yttrium is a transition metal ion that exists in a tricationic state, Y(III), that can readily reach coordination numbers of 8 and 9 in its complexes and prefers octadentate coordinating ligands. Acyclic polyaminocarboxylates such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and macrocyclic polyaminocarboxylates such as 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) have been used as chelating agents for yttrium ().
The chelating agents themselves are modified to provide a method to link them to antibodies and peptides (e.g., cyclic and mixed anhydrides of DTPA), alternatively linking groups such as isothiocyanatobenzyl group (SCN-Bz) are incorporated to the chelating agent by covalent linkage to the carbon backbone of the chelating agents [
25]. In a pre-clinical study, the biodistribution of yttrium- and indium-labeled mAb B72.3 was compared in athymic mice bearing human colorectal cancer LS-174T tumors using three different chelate conjugates (SCN-Bz-EDTA, Cyclic anhydride-DTPA (ca-DTPA), and SCN-Bz-DTPA) [
26]. The yttrium uptake in the bone with the SCN-Bz-EDTA and ca-DTPA conjugated mAb was greater then 14 and 11% ID/g, respectively, while
88Y-SCN-Bz-DTPA-B72.3 showed only 3% ID/g. In contrast, the
111In-labeled B72.3 uptake in the bone with all three chelate conjugates was 2–3% ID/g. The differences in yttrium- versus indium-labeled mAb biodistributions demonstrates the differences in the
in vivo stability of different forms of acyclic polyaminocarboxylates for In(III) and Y(III); all three chelating agents were stable for
111In, but only the full DTPA with 3 amines and 5 carboxylate donors bound to the Y(III) was stable for
88Y, thereby elucidating the need for both better and more stable chelating agents for Y(III) and the need for a radioistopically matched imageable yttrium radionuclide to predict more accurate biodistribution and dosimetry of
90Y-labeled agent [
26].
To further understand and improve the
in vivo stability, additional studies were performed with backbone-substituted forms of the SCN-Bz-DTPA and DOTA [
27]. In this study, the biodistribution of yttrium-and indium-labeled mAb, B3, using two different chelate conjugates, i.e. 2-(
p-SCN-Bz)-6-methyl-DTPA (1B4M-DTPA) and 2-(p-SCN-Bz)-1,4,7,10 tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid (
C-DOTA) () were compared in tumor bearing athymic mice [
27]. Mice injected with indium and yttrium labeled 1B4M-DTPA-B3 showed a similar biodistribution in all tissues except the bones, where significantly higher accretion of yttrium than indium was observed, with 2.8% +/− 0.2% vs. 1.3% +/− 0.16% ID/g in the femur at 168 h, respectively (P < 0.0001) [
27]. In contrast, mice receiving indium and yttrium labeled
C-DOTA-B3 showed significantly higher accumulation of indium than yttrium in most tissues, including the bones and therefore further illustrating the differences between two radionuclides and the chelating agents. From these studies, it was observed that the SCN-Bz substituted onto the carbon backbone of DTPA for use in linkage to the antibody and the methyl groups incorporated onto the backbone sterically hindered the release of yttrium from the chelate and therefore demonstrated the superiority of backbone-substituted DTPA chelating agents over cyclic anhydride-DTPA chelating agents.
With a better understanding of the coordination chemistry and geometry of DTPA derivatives, a cyclohexyl derivative of DTPA (CHX-DTPA) was developed, which demonstrated excellent stability in vitro and in vivo [
25,
28,
29]. Interestingly, the stereochemistry of CHX-DTPA played a major role in the
in vivo stability of yttrium labeled agents and subsequent bone uptake. The single enantiomeric [(
R)-2-amino-3-(4-isothiocyanatophenyl)propyl]-trans-(
S,S)-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine-pentaacetic acid (CHX-A″-DTPA) radioimmunoconjugate was found to be more stable as compared to the corresponding diastereomeric pair of CHX-B-DTPA radioimmunoconjugates (). After 7 days post-injection, bone uptake of the yttrium labeled CHX-B′-DTPA or CHX-B″-DTPA radioimmunoconjugates was 5 times higher than that of the yttrium labeled CHX-A″-DTPA radioimmunoconjugate [
28,
30]. For labeling of peptides at the
N-terminus, an
N-hydroxysuccinimidyl penta-
tert-butyl ester derivative of CHX-A″–DTPA featuring a glutaric acid spacer was developed () [
31] In order to further improve the stability, DOTA derivatives such as SCN-Bz-DOTA were explored for radiolabeling antibodies and peptides with yttrium [
32–
34]. In a comparative study, it was found that DOTA conjugated antibody was more stable than the DTPA conjugated [
33]. Since then, numerous pre-clinical and clinical studies have been published reporting DTPA and DOTA based chelating agents for
90Y radionuclide therapy and thus extrapolating to
86Y for PET imaging [
15,
16,
31,
35].
For
in vivo applications, kinetic inertness of yttrium–chelator complexes or conjugates is more relevant than thermodynamic stability [
36]. For yttrium, acyclic chelating agents are less kinetically inert than macrocyclic complexes of comparable stability, but at the same time acyclic chelating agents have faster metal-binding kinetics at room temperature compared with their macrocyclic analogues, which can be a significant advantage for radiolabeling of antibodies which are thermosensitive.