PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Chem Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 October 5.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3183238
NIHMSID: NIHMS323537

Asymmetric Synthesis of Ageliferin

Abstract

We describe herein an asymmetric synthesis of ageliferin. A Mn(III)-mediated oxidative radical cyclization reaction was used as the key step to construct the core skeleton of this pyrrole-imidazole dimer. This approach resembles the bio-genic [4+2] dimerization in an intramolecular fashion.

Pyrrole-imidazole alkaloids are a family of highly nitrogenated and halogenated natural products that possess unique molecular skeletons and significant biological activities.1 Ageliferin (1) is a dimeric member found in many Agelas and Stylissa sponges.2 Conceptually, it is a [4+2] dimer of two molecules of hymenidin (2) (Figure 1). Together with the [2+2] and [3+2] congeners, these alkaloids provide valuable opportunities for studying chemistry. Over the past decades, chemists have developed various strategies to address the issues associated with their laboratory synthesis.3 Notably, the synthesis of the [2+2] dimer sceptrin has been achieved by Baran4 and Birman,5 and the [4+2] and [3+2] dimers ageliferin (1),6 axinellamine,7 massadine,8 and palau’amine9 by Baran. Ohta has also reported a synthesis of 12,12′-dimethylageliferin.10 Complementary to these elegant approaches, we seek to examine the potential of radical addition reactions in mimicking the putative [4+2] biosynthesis pathway. We further wish to use laboratory synthesis to support the viability of the biosynthetic hypotheses. We report herein the successful implementation of such an approach in the synthesis of 1.

Figure 1
Ageliferin and its hypothetical biosynthetic pathway.

One prevailing biosynthesis proposal for these alkaloids is that the [2+2] and [4+2] dimers are generated by direct dimerization11 while the [3+2] dimers are derived from the [4+2] dimers through an oxidative ring-contraction reaction.12 We therefore sought to explore the hypothetical central role of 1 in the biosynthesis of this family of natural products. This direction of research has also been pursued by Romo, Lovely, and Baran.13 Regarding the [4+2] dimerization, a Diels–Alder reaction has been used by Romo, Lovely, and Ohta in their biomimetic synthesis.14 We envisioned that oxidation of β-ketoester 3 would initiate a radical tandem cyclization reaction affording 4 after removing the tether (Figure 1). We anticipated that mimicking this dimerization in an intramolecular way would allow for better efficiency and stereochemical controls. In addition, an asymmetric synthesis can be achieved with a chiral R* group. This transformation resembles the biogenic formation of the C9–C9′ and C10–C15′ bonds in producing 1.

We have recently demonstrated that oxidation of an allylic γ-imidazolinoyl-β-ketoester (3, X=O) with Mn(OAc)3 readily provides the core skeleton of 1,15,16 which can further be transformed to 13,13′-dioxoageliferin. However, all attempts to convert the imidazolinone groups to aminoimidazole groups failed. We therefore redesigned our route and introduced the 13- and 13′-amino groups at an early stage. An allylic γ-imidazolyl-β-ketoester (3, X=N) was employed despite the difficulty of radical addition to imidazole.17

Starting from BOM-protected imidazole 5,18 chlorination at the 2-position and formylation at the 4-position can be carried out in one-pot to give 6 (Scheme 1). The BOM group serves as a good directing group for the second lithiation reaction providing good regioselectivity. The azido group can then be introduced easily by aromatic substitution to give 7. Separately, allylic alcohol 8, obtained from Garner’s aldehyde according to known procedures,19 was coupled to Boc-β-Ala-OH to afford 9. Both crude 7 and 9 were used directly in the subsequent reaction.

Scheme 1
Preparation of 7 and 9.a

β-Ketoester 10 for the critical Mn-oxidation reaction was synthesized from 7 and 9 through an aldol reaction and Dess-Martin oxidation (Scheme 2). Treating 10 with Mn(OAc)3 in acetic acid at 50–60 °C or Mn(picolinate)3 in methanol at 90 °C gave 11 and 12 in a 2.5–3:1 ratio. The major product 11 was isolated in 18–25% yield and the minor product 12 in ca. 9% yield over four steps based on 8.20 Lactones 11 and 12 differ only in their C9′ stereochemistry as the two compounds gave rise to the same product 13 after decarboxylation. These results suggest that only one face of the olefin was accessible for the radical addition. However, the facial selectivity is opposite to that predicted based on the A1,3 strain model,21 giving ent-1 at the end of the synthesis. The stereoselectivity for reactions of homologated Garner’s aldehyde derivatives has been shown to be less predictable.22

Scheme 2
Completion of synthesis of ageliferin.a

Removal of the tether for the manganese oxidation reaction can be done under mild conditions. As previously described, decarboxylation of both 11 and 12 gave 13. The initial trans decarboxylation product epimerized rapidly at the C9′ position to give cis-13. This rather unexpected stereochemical preference presumably helps release the unfavorable steric interactions among the three side-chains while maintaining the carbonyl-imidazole conjugation on a flattened half-chair cyclohexenone ring.23 Considering the propensity of this C9′ epimerization, we decided to correct this stereochemical issue at a late stage and focus on the installation of the remaining functional groups.

Converting the hydroxyl group of 13 to an amino group was surprisingly difficult, due presumably to the congested steric environment. After extensive studies, we found that 13 can first be mesylated and then converted to an iodide. Reaction of this iodide with NaN3 in warm DMSO gave 14 in moderate yields.

To install the pyrrole side-chains, the azido groups were first reduced by a Staudinger reaction. Interestingly, we found the triphenylphosphine imide of aminoimidazole to be quite stable toward hydrolysis, rendering it a good protecting group for our synthesis. The acetonide and Boc groups can be removed selectively to yield triamine 15, which was crashed out from the ether solution to remove the excess reagents and triphenylphosphine oxide. Installation of the pyrrole groups was done with good regioselectivity, giving a 3:1 ratio of 16 and the mono-pyrrole product, which can be resubjected to the reaction to improve the overall efficiency.

With the pyrrole side-chains in place, our next task was to introduce the second aminoimidazole group. After evaluating several routes, we found the following one most efficient and reliable. A guanidine group was first introduced selectively to 16. Oxidation of the hydroxyl group then gave an aldehyde that slowly cyclized with the guanidine to give aminoimidazole 17. Addition of 0.5 equivalent of TFA after oxidation facilitated this cyclization.

At this stage, we found that the C9′ epimerization can be easily done to provide the correct C9′ configuration under acidic conditions. The C10′ carbonyl group was then removed with sequential reductions to afford 18. The BOM protecting group was subsequently removed by a two-step process. The benzyl group was first cleaved by BCl3. The resulting hydroxymethyl group was then removed by basic hydrolysis. Finally, the triphenylphosphine imide group was hydrolyzed by HCl at 60 °C to afford ageliferin, whose CD spectrum indicated that ent-1 was obtained. The absolute configuration of 1 has been assigned by Baran.6b

In summary, utilizing an oxidative radical tandem cyclization reaction as the key step, we successfully synthesized ent-ageliferin (ent-1) in a biomimetic fashion. Our synthesis supports the possibility that a single-electron transfer (SET) reaction is used in nature to dimerize 2 to form 1.24 We are currently applying this strategy to the biomimetic synthesis of the [3+2] pyrrole-imidazole dimers.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We dedicate this communication to Prof. David A. Evans on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Financial Support was provided by NIH (NIGMS R01-GM079554, 4R01-GM079554-S1), the Welch Foundation (I-1596) and UT Southwestern. C.C. is a Southwestern Medical Foundation Scholar in Biomedical Research.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information. Experimental procedures, and characterization data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

1. For reviews, see: (a) Hoffmann H, Lindel T. Synthesis. 2003:1753–1783.(b) Jacquot DEN, Lindel T. Curr Org Chem. 2005;9:1551–1565.(c) Du H, He Y, Sivappa R, Lovely CJ. Synlett. 2006:965–992.(d) Köck M, Grube A, Seiple IB, Baran PS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:6586–6594. [PubMed](e) Weinreb SM. Nat Prod Rep. 2007;24:931–948. [PubMed](f) Arndt HD, Riedrich M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4785–4788. [PubMed](g) Heasley B. Eur J Org Chem. 2009:1477–1489.(h) Forte B, Malgesini B, Piutti C, Quartieri F, Scolaro A, Papeo G. Mar Drugs. 2009;7:705–753. [PubMed](i) Gaich T, Baran PS. J Org Chem. 2010;75:4657–4673. [PubMed](j) Al-Mourabit A, Zancanella MA, Tilvi S, Romo D. Nat Prod Rep. 2011;28:1229–1260. [PubMed]
2. (a) Rinehart KL. Pure Appl Chem. 1989;61:525–528.(b) Kobayashi J, Tsuda H, Murayama T, Nakamura H, Ohizumi Y, Ishibashi M, Iwamura M. Tetrahedron. 1990;46:5579–5586.(c) Keifer PA, Schwartz RE, Koker MES, Robert G, Hughes J, Rittschof D, Rinehart KL. J Org Chem. 1991;56:2965–2975.
3. For examples, see: (a) Overman LE, Rogers BN, Tellew JE, Trenkle WC. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:7159–7160.(b) Lanman BA, Overman LE, Paulini R, White NS. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:12896–12900. [PubMed](c) Starr JT, Koch G, Carreira EM. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:8793–8794.(d) Chinigo GM, Carreira ABEM. Org Lett. 2011;13:78–81. [PubMed](e) Dilley AS, Romo D. Org Lett. 2001;3:1535–1538. [PubMed](f) Zancanella MA, Romo D. Org Lett. 2008;10:3685–3688. [PubMed](g) Lovely CJ, Du H, Dias HVR. Org Lett. 2001;3:1319–1322. [PubMed](h) Lovely CJ, Du H, He Y, Dias HVR. Org Lett. 2004;6:735–738. [PubMed](i) Koenig SG, Miller SM, Leonard KA, Löwe RS, Chen BC, Austin DJ. Org Lett. 2003;5:2203–2206. [PubMed](j) Garrido-Hernandez H, Nakadai M, Vimolratana M, Li Q, Doundoulakis T, Harran PG. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:765–769. [PubMed](k) Li Q, Hurley P, Ding H, Roberts AG, Akella R, Harran PG. J Org Chem. 2009;74:5909–5919. [PubMed](l) Bultman MS, Ma J, Gin DY. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:6821–6824. [PMC free article] [PubMed](m) Hudon J, Cernak TA, Ashenhurst JA, Gleason JL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:8885–8888. [PubMed](n) Feldman KS, Nuriye AY. Org Lett. 2010;12:4532–4535. [PubMed](o) Namba K, Inai M, Sundermeier U, Greshock TJ, Williams RM. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010;51:6557–6559. [PubMed]
4. Baran PS, Zografos AL, O’Malley DP. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:3726–3727. [PubMed]
5. Birman VB, Jiang XT. Org Lett. 2004;6:2369–2371. [PubMed]
6. (a) Baran PS, O’Malley DP, Zografos AL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:2674–2677. [PubMed](b) Baran PS, Li K, O’Malley DP, Mitsos C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:249–252. [PubMed](c) Northrop BH, O’Malley DP, Zografos AL, Baran PS, Houk KN. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:4126–4130. [PubMed](d) O’Malley DP, Li K, Maue M, Zografos AL, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:4762–4775. [PubMed]
7. (a) Yamaguchi J, Seiple IB, Young IS, O’Malley DP, Maue M, Baran PS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:3578–3580. [PubMed](b) O’Malley DP, Yamaguchi J, Young IS, Seiple IB, Baran PS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:3581–3583. [PubMed](c) Su S, Rodriguez RA, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:13922–13925. [PubMed]
8. Su S, Seiple IB, Young IS, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:16490–16491. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. (a) Seiple IB, Su S, Young IS, Lewis CA, Yamaguchi J, Baran PS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:1095–1098. [PMC free article] [PubMed](b) Seiple IB, Su S, Young IS, Nakamura A, Yamaguchi J, Jørgensen L, Rodriguez RA, O’Malley DP, Gaich T, Köck M, Baran PSJ. Am Chem Soc, ASAP. doi: 10.1021/ja2047232. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. (a) Kawasaki I, Sakaguchi N, Fukushima N, Fujioka N, Nikaido F, Yamashita M, Ohta S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:4377–4380.(b) Kawasaki I, Sakaguchi N, Khadeer A, Yamashita M, Ohta S. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:10182–10192.
11. (a) Walker RP, Faulkner DJ, Engen DV, Clardy J. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:6772–6773.(b) Ref. 2c. (c) Olofson A, Yakushijin K, Horne DA. J Org Chem. 1997;62:7918–7919. [PubMed](d) Kinnel RB, Gehrken HP, Swali R, Skoropowski G, Scheuer PJ. J Org Chem. 1998;63:3281–3286.(e) Al Mourabit A, Potier P. Eur J Org Chem. 2001:237–243.(f) Ref. 6. Herein, the [2+2] dimers were suggested to be the biosynthesis precursors of the [4+2] dimers (g) Travert N, Al-Moura A. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:10252–10253. [PubMed](h) Pöverlein C, Breckle G, Lindel T. Org Lett. 2006;8:819–821. [PubMed](i) Ma Z, Lu J, Wang X, Chen C. Chem Commun. 2011;47:427–429. [PMC free article] [PubMed](j) Feldman KS, Nuriye AY, Li J. J Org Chem. 2011;76:5042–5060. [PubMed]
12. (a) Ref. 11d. (b) Ref. 11e. (c) Ref. 6d. (d) Ref. 11i. (e) Ref. 11j.
13. (a) Ref. 3e. (b) Ref. 3 h. (c) Ref. 6d.
14. (a) Ref. 3e. (b) Ref. 3g. (c) Ref. 10.
15. Tan X, Chen C. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:4345–4348. [PubMed](b) Ref. 11i.
16. (a) Snider BB. Chem Rev. 1996;96:339–363. [PubMed](b) Melikyan GG. Org React. 1997;49:427–675.
17. Knueppel D, Martin SF. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:2569–2571. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Brown T, Jones JH, Richards JD. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1982;1:1553–1561.
19. Kozikowski AP, Ma D, Du L, Lewin NE, Blumberg PM. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:6666–6672.
20. All the reaction products beyond this point in the synthesis were purified by reverse-phase column chromatography or HPLC to minimize material loss. Most HPLC purification was performed in the presence of TFA and all the basic products, including ageliferin (1), were therefore isolated as TFA salts. The by-product produced from IBX oxidation decomposed 17 upon concentration. While ageliferin (1) is generally stable toward acids, neutralization or direct concentration of the reaction mixture of the final step led to considerable decomposition. Therefore, 17 and 1 were purified directly by HPLC without workup.
21. Hoffmann RW. Chem Rev. 1989;89:1841–1860.
22. (a) Shimamoto K, Ishida M, Shinozaki H, Ohfune Y. J Org Chem. 1991;56:4167–4176.(b) Sakai N, Ohfune Y. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:998–1010.(c) Mordini A, Valacchi M, Pecchi S, Degl’Innocenti A, Reginato G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:5209–5212.
23. Conformational analysis of an analog of 13 having simplified substituent groups indicates that the cis- and trans-isomers are close in energy. Increasing the size of the side-chains led to the equatorial-axial-axial conformer of the cis-isomer being more stable than the all equatorial conformer of the trans-isomer. For an example of related conformational analysis, see: Todoroki Y, Hirai N. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:8095–8100.
24. We thank a reviewer for suggesting this biosynthetic hypothesis. It should also be noted that failed attempts to directly dimerize oroidin (bromo-2) to form dibromo-1 under thermal conditions have been reported: Ref. 11h.