We describe for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the reproductive toxicology of the two enantiomeric forms of the intestinally derived soy isoflavone equol. This was possible because of our ability to synthesize in bulk, enantiomeric pure
S-(−)equol, the natural enantiomer, and
R-(+)equol its diastereoisomer [
31], which could then be incorporated into the diet. These studies are timely in light of the recent commercialization of the
S-(−)equol as a dietary supplement [
29,
39,
54,
55] and the continuing concerns over the safety and reproductive toxicity, especially the uterotrophic actions, of isoflavones in general [
2,
37,
40,
56–
59]. There have been no previous in-depth reports of the toxicology of the individual enantiomers of equol, although several studies have reported on aspects of the reproductive toxicology of a racemic mixture of equol [
42,
60,
61], or on uterine effects in adult animals [
62,
63]. Recently
S-(−)equol only, was reported to be without genotoxicity or mutagenicity [
40,
64]. Given the contrasting ER binding affinities of the two enantiomers [
27–
30,
58], and the recent finding that the racemic mixture displays different pharmacokinetic behavior to that of the individual pure enantiomers [
55], findings from studies using the racemate may not necessarily apply to the individual pure enantiomers. In contrast, there is a large literature on adverse reproductive effects of soy isoflavones, most notably genistein, in animal species [
65–
67], although the value of the findings to humans remains debatable because in most studies the route of administration was by subcutaneous injection, which bypasses first-pass metabolism and changes the pharmacodynamics and thus the biological potency of the compounds. Route of administration and dose are crucial considerations in evaluating the clinical significance of any demonstrable reproductive effects. In this regard, and of greater relevance, we have examined the effects of early-life dietary exposure to the equol enantiomers, and the dose selected for testing, 250 mg/kg diet, was chosen to be consistent with our previous studies where differential chemopreventive effects of these enantiomers were reported in an animal model of chemically induced mammary cancer [
32,
33]. Furthermore, at this level of dietary intake, equol is metabolically handled similarly to that in humans consuming soy isoflavones [
4,
7], and to
S-(−)equol when administered as a supplement [
55], or as a pure compound [
41,
68]. The rat pups were exposed to equol enantiomers throughout pregnancy and during lactation. The transplacental passage of isoflavones is well established in both rodents [
35,
36] and humans [
69,
70], and the efficient transfer of isoflavones to the offspring via the dam’s milk during suckling has been confirmed from previous studies of rats fed soy-containing diets [
71], or administered pure isoflavones [
32,
37,
72]. In response to exposure to 250 mg/kg diet, relatively high steady-state plasma concentrations of
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol are evident on PND-21 of life [
32]. These concentrations are in a similar range to those reported in humans consuming soy foods [
4], or rodents fed soy-containing commercial rodent diets [
34]. These plasma equol concentrations were also consistent with those reported by Lamartiniere et al. for animals fed daidzein early in life [
37], which is very efficiently converted to
S-(−)equol by rodents [
30]; and based on the known pharmacokinetics of equol enantiomers, were within the plasma concentration range for adults consuming
S-(−)equol as either a pure compound [
41,
68], or as a supplement [
55].
The most significant concerns over the safety of isoflavones have been the issue of whether soy isoflavone exposure in females increases the risk of breast cancer in high-risk groups and whether it adversely affects the uterus [
2,
73,
74]. The findings from the athymic mouse model of human breast cancer, where genistein was shown to stimulate the growth of transplanted human MCF-7 breast cancer cells [
75], led to considerable concern over the consumption of soy foods or isoflavone exposure particularly by postmenopausal women and women at high risk for breast cancer. However, recent epidemiological studies of postmenopausal women now indicate these concerns are largely unfounded [
76,
77]. A large prospective follow-up of 5033 breast cancer survivors living in Shanghai, with a median follow-up of 3.9 years, found an inverse relationship between soy food intake and risk of mortality or recurrence, with women in the highest quartile of intake (>15.3 g/d soy protein, or >62.8 mg/d total isoflavones) being approximately 1/3 less likely to die from, or suffer breast cancer recurrence [
77]. These findings were corroborated in data from a study of 1,954 Californian breast cancer survivors, diagnosed between 1997 and 2000, with a median follow-up of 6.2 years, which found a 60% reduction in breast cancer recurrence between highest and lowest intake of soy foods [
76]. In neither of these studies was equol-producer status examined. However, we have shown previously that
S-(−)equol does not stimulate tumor growth, and the unnatural enantiomer,
R-(+)equol, in contrast is chemopreventive in the DMBA-induced animal model of breast cancer [
33]. Interestingly, and in stark contrast to the effects of genistein [
75], racemic equol was reported to have no stimulatory effect in the athymic mouse model of human breast cancer [
78]. Thus, the body of evidence indicates that equol at physiologically relevant levels has no adverse effects on the breast.
Equol, has been shown to adversely affect the uterus in several animal species [
38,
79–
81]. The very high exposure to
S-(−)equol derived from isoflavones, naturally abundant in red clover, devastated the sheep breeding industry in regions of SW Australia [
38], while infertility and liver disease in captive cheetah were shown to be caused by dietary soy isoflavones, an effect that was exacerbated by the inability of cheetah to metabolize isoflavones by glucuronidation [
79], the major metabolic pathway in humans [
7]. To our knowledge there are no published data on the effects of equol in women. Legette et al. found that dietary racemic equol, while having a modest benefit on bone in the ovariectomized rat, was mildly uterotrophic [
60]. On the other hand, racemic equol, when injected on postnatal days 1–5 as opposed to given in the diet, resulted in an initial non-significant increase in uterine weight followed later by a significant decrease by PND-20 and PND-25 [
42]. Also, racemic equol injected at 10, 100, and 1000 μg/animal on PND-10 to PND-14 caused a dose-dependent decrease in the uterine gland count when animals were sacrificed at PND-14. These findings illustrate the importance of considering the route of administration when drawing conclusions and extrapolations to humans.
We previously reported that chronic feeding of both
R-(+)equol and
S-(−)equol at the dose used here had no significant impact on the absolute uterine weight of intact adult Sprague–Dawley rats [
33]. However, this animal is relatively insensitive to estrogens, when compared with some other species of rodent, or when compared to the ovariectomized, or immature animal [
82]. In data we present here, both dietary
R-(+)equol and
S-(−)equol exposure in early life, a period sensitive to hormonal changes, caused a significant increase in uterine weight that was also evidenced histologically by highly significant increases in stromal thickness on PND-21, an effect that was sustained at PND-50.
S-(−)equol was not immediately effective in influencing luminal epithelial cell height and myometrial thickness on PND-21, but uterine hyperplasia was evident on PND-50, despite an approximate 30-day lapse in which there had been no exposure to
S-(−)equol. These findings are consistent with a mild estrogen effect, also shown in ovariectomized rats with a 400 mg/kg diet of racemic equol [
61], and are perhaps expected based on the low affinity for the ER. By contrast, exposure to
R-(+)equol caused an early transient and significant increase in cell height and stromal and myometrial thickness seen on PND-21, but this hyperplastic effect was not sustained once exposure was withdrawn. By PND-50 myometrial thickness of rats exposed to
R-(+)equol was actually significantly smaller than controls []. Thus, while both enantiomers influence the uterus during development, the differential effects would suggest this possibly occurs by different mechanisms, which might be anticipated as
R-(+)equol and
S-(−)equol have different affinities for the ER subtypes [
4,
27–
29].
Overall, prenatal/postnatal exposure to
S-(−)equol or
R-(+)equol had no adverse effect on the in-utero development and reproductive anatomy and physiology of the offspring. The breeding efficiency was similar among groups, as was the ratio of female/male offspring delivered []. Rats fed commercial rodent diets containing soy isoflavones show an accelerated time of vaginal opening (VO), and there is an inverse correlation between the total daidzein and genistein content of the diet and the day of vaginal opening. The significance of VO timing in rats as it relates to the human is unclear, but it is considered a highly sensitive marker of exposure to environmental estrogens [
83]. In our studies, the timing of vaginal opening in the offspring was unaffected by
S-(−)equol or
R-(+)equol at the exposure level of 250 mg/kg diet. Whether, higher doses would have invoked a change is uncertain, but these findings suggest a lack of profound estrogen effect of
S-(−)equol or
R-(+)equol at physiological levels of exposure. Similarly, anogenital distances did not differ significantly from the values of control animals.
The effect of
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol on the ovaries was unremarkable and indicative of a lack of overt toxicity. Histological analysis of the ovaries on PND-21 and PND-50 showed normal follicular development. This is perhaps not surprising, at least for
S-(−)equol, because most rodents are reared on commercial soy-containing diets and are naturally exposed to very high circulating concentrations of
S-(−)equol [
34], which is formed by intestinal bacteria from daidzein/daidzein in the diet [
30]. This finding is consistent with a previous study reporting pure daidzein fed during the prenatal/postnatal period and up to PND-50 did not adversely affect ovarian follicular development [
37].
The potential for soy isoflavones to have adverse effects on male reproductive development and reproduction has been hotly debated [
84]. Masculinization of the developing male fetus occurs early and testicular differentiation during the fetal period is critical for development of maleness [
85]. Since we fed
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol throughout pregnancy the male fetus was exposed to equol from conception up to PND-21 and male reproductive structures could have been impacted at any stage of development.
Our data on the effects of
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol in male rats indicate a lack of overt toxicity on the male reproductive system as evidenced by typical anogenital distance when normalized to body weight and no significant effect on the timing of testicular descent. However,
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol seemed to trigger early development of the seminiferous tubules as seen by greater tubular diameter during treatment exposure, but no long-term effects once treatment was discontinued. The testes are structures that continue to increase in size well past a point when other structures have reached full maturity, for example the seminiferous tubular length and diameter increases up to PND-108 [
86]. This early tubular development did not adversely affect sperm production as both control and treatment groups had appropriate stages of sperm on PND-22, and normal mature sperm were present in the seminiferous tubules of all groups on PND-50. The tortuous epididymal ducts, which store sperm in transit from the testis to the vas deferens, also evidenced no signs of abnormality as would have been indicated by the presence of cellular debris, immature germ cells or epithelium characterized by vacuoles and basophilic cytoplasmic staining [
52]. But in keeping with the integrity of the seminiferous tubules in the testis we observed normal epididymal cell types, sizes and stereo cilia in the head, body and tail of the epididymus of both treatment groups at PND-22 and PND-50. Our results here, taken together with the findings from older studies that red clover had no adverse effects on sperm development or fertility in the ram [
87,
88] suggest there should be no concern for the use of equol enantiomers in men. This is supported by a recent review that concluded there is little clinical evidence that soy or soy isoflavones have any deleterious effects on male reproduction [
84].
Development and maintenance of accessory sex glands is hormone dependent, and chemicals that adversely impact the testis hormonal secretions also cause degeneration of the seminal vesicles and prostate. Normal development of the dorsolateral prostate, ventral prostate, seminal vesicles and coagulating gland attest to a lack of negative effect by either equol enantiomer. These effects of the equol enantiomers differ from those of dietary genistein, which when give in the diet at a similar dose (300 mg/kg diet) resulted in smaller anogenital distance and testis size, as well as delayed preputial separation and abnormal reproductive behavior male rats [
89]. Again these comparisons show that all isoflavones cannot be considered to have identical biological effects.
Finally, we previously reported significant effects of postnatal and adult exposure to dietary equol on body weight gain in female Sprague–Dawley rats [
32,
33], although these earlier studies did not examine any effect of exposure during pregnancy. In this study,
S-(−)equol exposure in-utero led to both male and female pups being heavier at birth when compared to controls, an effect that could be considered beneficial since higher birth weight correlates positively with newborn survival. This effect on birth weight was not seen with in utero exposure to
R-(+)equol. However, once the pups began suckling and were exposed post-natally to
S-(−)equol via the mother’s milk, the female pups showed a lower rate of weight gain (although not statistically significant) than that of the controls, and this lag was sustained beyond the period of
S-(−)equol exposure, until final sacrifice at PND-50. This is in agreement with our previous data where
S-(−)equol was fed post-natally [
32,
90].
R-(+)equol exposed female pups showed no significant differences in body weights compared to controls at birth, PND-21 or PND-50. In male animals, there were no significant postnatal effects of either enantiomer on the rate of weight gain. It is highly likely that had we continued feeding
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol beyond PND-21, and throughout adult life there would have been a significant effect on body weight. It is well recognized that soy-containing diets given chronically lead to lower body weight gains and reduced amounts of adipose tissue in female rats [
90,
91] and the effects have been attributed to the presence of isoflavones [
37,
92], although the mechanism of action is not fully understood. Taken in context with the other studies, we suggest that
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol may play a role in dictating early weight gain and consequently reduced risk of obesity later in life.
In conclusion, we found that consistent with the low binding affinity of equol enantiomers for the estrogen receptor, dietary exposure to equol enantiomers throughout pregnancy and in the postnatal period up to day 21 of life had no major effects on reproduction or on the development of the male and female reproductive organs of the offspring. Of the significant findings, the effect of
S-(−)equol on increasing birth weight can be considered beneficial, while the transient effect of
R-(+)equol on stimulating greater production of primordial follicles is unclear with regard to risk/benefit to human infants. The sustained effect of
S-(−)equol and
R-(+)equol on the uterus in increasing luminal epithelial cell height, and myometrial and stromal thickness is not unexpected given that these enantiomers have an affinity for ERs. After all, if equol is to have clinically significant estrogenic effects of benefit to women’s health then it should also be expected at some exposure level to influence the uterus. Whether the effects seen in neonatal rats would be observed in newborn infants of mothers consuming equol during pregnancy or lactation is unknown. However, since 50–60% of Asians consuming soy foods produce equol [
5,
6,
10], and during pregnancy Asian women do not avoid soy foods, it could be inferred that exposure to equol must occur during human pregnancy because isoflavones and equol readily cross the placenta [
34,
69,
70,
93]. This evidence, and the prolific Asian population consuming soy leads us to suggest that equol exposure is unlikely to lead to adverse effects in the newborn infant, and might even be beneficial in the longer term. Finally, the mild uterotrophic effect on myometrial thickness from early exposure that was sustained by
S-(−)equol but not by
R-(+)equol may suggest that very high doses of these enantiomers could negatively influence the uterus of the newborn and
S(−)-equol should perhaps be contraindicated for women during pregnancy. With regard to men’s health, it would appear that the effects of both enantiomers on the development of the testes and prostate are rather benign, and this is an important finding because both enantiomers have clinical potential for the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer and are likely to be tested in future clinical trials.