Our studies demonstrate that induction of osteoarthritis in the APP/PS1 mouse model of AD at 2 months of age resulted in the development of Aβ plaques and neuroinflammation as early as 4 months of age, whereas there was lack of Aβ plaques in the absence of osteoarthritis. APP/PS1 mice showed a modest level of Aβ pathology and neuroinflammation at 6 months of age, a time point when mice with osteoarthritis displayed a greater number of Aβ plaques. Aβ pathology and neuroinflammation was further exacerbated at the 8 month time point. These findings are consistent with the literature, whereby APP/PS1 transgenic mice begin developing Aβ plaque pathology at 5-6 months of age [
26]. Overall, our data show that the induction of osteoarthritis in young adult APP/PS1;Col1-IL1
βXAT transgenic mice exacerbates and accelerates the development of AD pathology, suggesting that peripheral inflammation may be associated with increased risk for AD pathology.
Peripheral inflammation as a risk factor for AD was previously suggested by several clinical [
1-
6] and animal studies. For example, Cunningham and coworkers [
9,
10] examined the effects of acute systemic inflammation by means of LPS intraperitoneal injections in a mouse model of prion disease. They reported induction of acute behavioral and cognitive changes, along with acceleration of neurodegeneration and exacerbation of brain inflammation. Similar results were also reported by another study [
27]. Intraperitoneal LPS injection in the PS1 transgenic mouse model of AD resulted in increased transcript levels for a number of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNFα, as well as induction in Aβ40 & Aβ42 levels in the brain [
12]. In another study, LPS injection in the triple transgenic mouse model of AD (3xTg-AD) exacerbated Tau pathology by a cdk5 - mediated pathway, but did not have a measurable effect on Aβ [
28]. Repeated LPS injections in wild type mice resulted in accumulation of Aβ1-42 in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of mice through increased β- and γ-secretase activities along with increased expression of amyloid precursor protein [
11].
Brain inflammation is considered an integral part of AD, sparked initially by observations of colocalization of MHC class II
+ microglia with neuritic plaques [
29,
30]. In the ensuing years, neuroinflammation was implicated as a primary contributor to AD pathogenesis based on epidemiologic studies linking chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use to reduced AD incidence [
31] and the encouraging results of a few preliminary clinical studies (e.g. [
30]). Subsequent clinical trials employing glucocorticoids [
32] and NSAIDS [
33,
34] on patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment [
35], as well as cognitively normal individuals at risk for AD [
36], offered little support for the inflammatory hypothesis. Anti-inflammatory treatment of APP/PS1 double transgenic (2xTg-AD) mice had no effect on Aβ metabolism in the brain [
37]. However, a subset of NSAIDS have been shown to possess γ-secretase modulating activity that can reduce Aβ production
in vitro and
in vivo independently of cyclooxygenase activity [
38]. Previous studies in our laboratory, examining the role of brain inflammation in AD pathology, revealed that chronic, low level expression of IL-1β in the brain of GFAP-IL1β
XAT; APP/PS1 compound transgenic mice resulted in amelioration of AD pathology via removal of Aβ plaques following the recruitment of peripheral immune cells in the brain [
19,
39].
But how is joint osteoarthritis linked to AD pathology? Numerous clinical and animal reports in the past showed an increase in circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines in the serum of patients and small animals suffering from arthritis [
40]. To this end, our data showed a significant increase in IL-6 serum levels after the induction of osteoarthritis. A likely scenario is that circulating cytokines contribute to brain inflammation and may exacerbate it in the context of AD. There are several mechanisms by which cytokines might influence the CNS [
41], including: (
A) direct diffusion through the incomplete blood-brain barrier in the circumventricular organs; (
B) activation of brain endothelial cells, which in turn signal to perivascular cells and cells of the brain parenchyma; (
C) active transport of cytokines across the blood-brain barrier via transporter systems that can be shared between cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL1RA), or transporters for specific cytokines (TNFα); and (
D) possible communication involving the vagus nerve or other neuronal afferents, which connect the peritoneal cavity with neuronal populations of the brain stem [
41,
42]. Although the exact mechanism by which circulating cytokines alter the CNS in our model is not known, it is anticipated that such signaling would result in exacerbation of the attendant glial cell activation and neuroinflammation in AD mice with osteoarthritis, which is exactly what our data demonstrate. It is interesting to note that neuroinflammation in our model of osteoarthritis was transient and resolved by the 6-month time point (8 months of age) in mice not carrying the APP/PS1 transgenes. In mice harboring such transgenes, pathology appears to continue to increase between 6 and 8 months, suggesting that a transient episode of peripheral inflammation is sufficient to trigger progressive AD pathology and neuroinflammation, perhaps through stimulation of a feed-forward process.
The specific mechanism linking peripherally induced neuroinflammation to AD pathology is not known, but might involve increased Aβ production [
11,
14,
43], decreased Aβ catabolism, or changes in Aβ transport [
44]. Alternatively, neuroinflammatory signals might limit the capacity of microglia and other cells to clear Aβ plaques [
45]. Future studies focused on Aβ metabolism as well as investigation of inflammatory mediators and microglial phenotypes will be required in this model. A potentially fruitful study would be to compare the neuroinflammatory response in this model of peripheral inflammation where plaques accumulate to a model of CNS induced neuroinflammation where plaques are reduced (e.g. [
39]).
Interestingly, physical exercise may reduce the degree of AD pathology in mice, raising the possibility that the changes we observed might be due to reduced locomotion in arthritic mice. Recent work on the subject reveals that short-term (1 month) locomotion exercise applied to AD mice (APP/PS1 and APP mutants) reduced total brain Aβ1-42 and Aβ1-40 levels, but did not influence plaque number [
46,
47]. However, long-term exercise (5 months) reportedly reduced Aβ plaque formation in the APP transgenic mouse [
46]. Development of osteoarthritis in our model began to effect locomotion 2 weeks following transgene activation in the joints, imposing a potential impact on overall health for 6 weeks (short term effect). Notwithstanding differences in physical activity between normally caged mice and those undergoing experimentally induced exercise, these data together with the aforementioned studies suggest that loss of physical activity due to osteoarthritis likely has little or no effect on Aβ plaque loading evaluated in our studies.
In conclusion, the aforementioned body of literature as well as our own findings point out that peripheral inflammation exacerbates AD pathology in mice. These results have significant implications in consideration of risk factors for AD and possibly other neurodegenerative conditions. In particular, osteoarthritis is a very prevalent disease, with nearly 90% of individuals over the age of 65 having some degree of joint pathology. Future studies will focus on the mechanisms by which peripheral inflammation and blood borne cytokines contribute to increased AD pathology in our model. Strategies to reduce peripheral inflammation or that are aimed at the link between peripheral inflammation and the CNS may well prove beneficial in reducing the burden of neurodegenerative disease.