A High-throughput Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Inhibitors of Gyrase B

doi:10.1177/1087057110392038

J Biomol Screen. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.

Published in final edited form as:

J Biomol Screen. 2011 February; 16(2): 230–238.

Published online 2011 January 18. doi: 10.1177/1087057110392038

PMCID: PMC3176662

NIHMSID: NIHMS324170

A High-throughput Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Inhibitors of Gyrase B

BRYAN T. GLASER,¹ JEREMIAH P. MALERICH,¹ SARAH J. DUELLMAN,¹ JULIE FONG,¹ CHRISTOPHER HUTSON,¹ RICHARD M. FINE,² BORIS KEBLANSKY,² MARY J. TANGA,¹ and PETER B. MADRID¹

¹SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA

²BioPredict, Oradell, NJ, USA

Address correspondence to: Peter B. Madrid, Ph.D., SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, CA 94025, Email: peter.madrid/at/sri.com

The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at J Biomol Screen

See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.

Abstract

DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA, is a validated antibacterial drug target. The holoenzyme is composed of 2 subunits, gyrase A (GyrA) and gyrase B (GyrB), which form a functional A₂B₂ heterotetramer required for bacterial viability. A novel fluorescence polarization (FP) assay has been developed and optimized to detect inhibitors that bind to the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding domain of GyrB. Guided by the crystal structure of the natural product novobiocin bound to GyrB, a novel novobiocin–Texas Red probe (Novo-TRX) was designed and synthesized for use in a high-throughput FP assay. The binding kinetics of the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB from Francisella tularensis has been characterized, as well as the effect of common buffer additives on the interaction. The assay was developed into a 21-μL, 384-well assay format and has been validated for use in high-throughput screening against a collection of Food and Drug Administration–approved compounds. The assay performed with an average Z′ factor of 0.80 and was able to identify GyrB inhibitors from a screening library.

Keywords: fluorescence polarization, gyrase, assay development, high-throughput screen, anthracycline

Introduction

DNA gyrase is an essential type II topoisomerase that catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils using the free energy of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis. The enzyme is composed of 2 subunits, gyrase A (GyrA) and gyrase B (GyrB), that form a functional A₂B₂ heterotetramer required for bacterial viability. The N-terminal domain of the GyrB subunit contains the ATP ase active site, and the C-terminal domain is necessary for the interaction with the GyrA subunit and DNA. The GyrA subunit is involved in the cleavage and reformation of DNA strands needed to supercoil DNA.^1–3 The GyrA subunit is targeted by quinolone antibiotics, which have broad-spectrum activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The GyrB subunit is targeted primarily by natural product antibiotics such as the aminocoumarin antibiotics (e.g., novobiocin⁴ and coumermycin⁵), as well as cyclothialidine. ⁶ Mutations that confer drug resistance to all 3 antibiotics have been reported.^7,8 Mutations associated with both coumarin and cyclothialidine resistance map to the periphery of the ATP binding site of GyrB that hydrolyzes ATP.⁹ The emergence of bacterial strains resistant to existing antibiotics makes it imperative to develop new classes of antibiotics that take into account these known mutations and, to the extent possible, restrict their mode of action to portions of the enzyme that are conserved by functional necessity. Residues required for coupling ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in GyrB have been identified using site-directed mutagenesis.⁹ Along with these extensive mutational data, analysis of high-quality crystal structures suggests the value of pursuing next-generation GyrB inhibitors that target the ATP binding domain.¹⁰ The ATP binding site within GyrB is highly conserved across bacterial species and is not present in humans, making it suitable for the development of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Because the bacterial gyrase holoenzyme has been the subject of multiple drug discovery efforts, many assays exist to measure its activity. Assays used for general studies of the holoenzyme as well as many high-throughput screens measure the ability of the enzyme to convert relaxed DNA into supercoiled DNA. Most of these studies use an assay that couples ATP hydrolysis to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), resulting in a measureable colorimetric change.^6,9,10 Similar assays directly measure the total level of supercoiled DNA using agarose gel separations or fluorescent dyes.^11–13 Cell-based assays that measure the level of DNA damage have also been used to measure gyrase activity.¹⁴ Although all of these assays can be used to measure the activity of the gyrase holoenzyme, they often require multiple addition steps, cannot separate GyrA from GyrB inhibitors, and do not focus on the ATP binding domain. One assay has been described that measures the direct binding of [³H]dihydronovobiocin to a biotin-labeled 43-kDa fragment of GyrB using a scintillation proximity assay (SP A).¹⁵ Although the SP A directly examines the ATP binding domain, an assay that uses fluorescence rather than radioactivity would be better suited for high-throughput screening (HTS).

Fluorescence polarization (FP) is a homogeneous assay that can be used to measure the binding interaction between molecules. ¹⁶ FP is based on the principle that a fluorophore excited by polarized light will also emit polarized light. Molecular motion, which is dependent on the size of the molecule, causes depolarization of the light by radiating at a different direction than the incident light. A small unbound fluorescent probe rotates rapidly and maintains low levels of polarization after excitation. If the fluorescent probe binds to a larger molecule, such as a protein, forming a stable complex, the bound probe rotates more slowly and increases the amount of polarized light. Binding is directly related to the polarization level of the sample: an unbound fluorescent probe has low FP, and a bound fluorescent probe has high FP. The FP assay is well suited for measuring the interaction between molecules in real time and is commonly used in HTS.¹⁷

This article presents the development and optimization of a novel FP assay to detect competitive inhibitors of the ATP binding domain of Francisella tularensis GyrB. We have designed and synthesized a novel fluorescent probe by covalently attaching a Texas Red fluorophore to novobiocin (Novo-TRX) guided by the GyrB/novobiocin crystal structure (Protein Data Bank entry 1KIJ).¹⁸ Experiments were performed to develop the FP assay and optimize the use of Novo-TRX to measure the competition for binding to the ATP binding domain of F. tularensis GyrB. We have determined the kinetics of the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB as well as the effect of common buffer additives on the interaction. The assay was also validated for use in HTS for inhibitors of the ATP binding domain by screening a small library of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved compounds. This screen identified a known GyrB inhibitor as well as 4 members of the anthracycline family of cancer therapeutics (doxorubicin, idarubicin, epirubicin, and daunorubicin).

Materials and Methods

Reagents

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted.

Synthesis of Novo-TRX

The Novo-TR X probe was synthesized by attaching a reactive secondary amine to novobiocin through a Mannich reaction followed by conjugation to the Texas Red–X fluorescent dye. To produce the reactive novobiocin amine intermediate, novobiocin sodium (400 mg, 0.62 mmol), paraformaldehyde (10.5 mg, 0.69 mmol), methyl-amine (471 μL, 0.94 mmol from 2M tetrahydrofuran [THF] solution), and acetic acid (56 μL, 0.94 mmol) were sealed in a glass microwave reactor vial with 4 mL of anhydrous THF. After the mixture was heated for 3 h at 115 °C, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude reaction was purified by preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPL C) to yield 115 mg of the pure product, which was confirmed by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and ¹H–nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis. The novobiocin amine intermediate (3.7 mg, 4.6 μmol) was dissolved in dry dimethylformamide (DMF; 200 μL) before Texas Red–X SE (2.5 mg, 3.0 μmol; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and triethylamine (50 μL) were added. The reaction was shaken for 2 h at room temperature, and then the entire mixture was directly injected onto the preparative HPL C system running with acetonitrile and water (0.1% TFA) to yield the pure Novo-TR X probe. The structure of Novo-TR X was confirmed by LC/MS and ¹H-NMR analysis.

Overexpression plasmids

GyrB was cloned into a pET28 expression plasmid (Novagen, Madison, WI) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from genomic DNA isolated from F. tularensis Schu S4. Primers were selected to add an amino-terminal His₆-tag. GyrB was cloned using the forward primer 5′-ATATAGCTAGCATG TTAATGTCTGAGAATAAAGCTTATGAC and the reverse primer 5′-ATATACTCGAGTATTAA-ACGTCTAAGTAA CCACATTAAGAG, which also added NheI and XhoI restriction enzyme sites, respectively. The sequence of GyrB was confirmed to be identical to the published source.¹⁹

Protein expression and purification

F. tularensis GyrB was produced from Escherichia coli BL21 Star (DE3) (Invitrogen) that carried the GyrB pET28 expression vector as described above. Briefly, GyrB was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) media at 37 °C until an optical density (OD)₆₀₀ of 0.4 was reached and then induced with 1 mM iso-propyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Bacteria were grown for 3 h at 30 °C after induction and then collected through centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in TGE (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 5% glycerol, and 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) and incubated with 250 μg/mL lysozyme for 20 min at 4 °C. Bacteria were lysed using sonication (4 × 30 s, 70% amplitude) and then centrifuged for 25 min at 22,000 g to remove cell debris.

GyrB was isolated from the supernatant fraction of the E. coli lysate by a multistep purification procedure using the AKTA Explorer (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). To begin, the supernatant was loaded onto a 5-mL HiTrap Heparin column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with TGE. Unbound material was washed from the column, and protein was eluted with a 0–1M NaCl gradient over 10 column volumes (CV) with a flow rate of 4 mL/min, and 4-mL fractions were collected. Fractions containing GyrB were identified using sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (see supplemental data online at http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/by/supplementaldata) and Western blotting for the amino-terminal His-tag, if necessary. Elution fractions containing GyrB were pooled, and guanidine HCl was added to produce a final concentration of 0.3 M. The pooled fractions were then loaded onto a 5-mL HisTrap nickel column (GE Healthcare) that was equilibrated with the low imidazole buffer (500 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 20 mM imidazole, and 0.01% Tween-20). The protein was eluted using a buffer containing 400 mM imidazole over 15 CV with a flow rate of 3 mL/min, and 3-mL fractions were collected. The pooled fractions containing GyrB were then loaded onto a 120-mL Sephacryl 16/60 S-200 HR size exclusion column (GE Healthcare) preequilibrated with a buffer containing 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 0.5 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 5 mM MgCl₂. An isocratic elution was performed with a flow rate of 1 mL/min for 1.5 CV, and 5-mL fractions were collected. Fractions containing purified GyrB were pooled and dialyzed into storage buffer (25 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 0.5 mM EDTA, 50% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 5 mM MgCl₂) using a 12-mL Slide-A-Lyzer, 10,000 MWCO (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific) with purified bovine serum albumin (BSA; Thermo Scientific) as the standard.

Equilibrium binding experiment

Association binding experiments were performed to determine the time necessary for the binding of Novo-TRX and GyrB to reach equilibrium. These experiments were performed in quadruplicate in a volume of 20 μL of the assay buffer (25 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl₂, 5 mM DTT, 5% glycerol) in black flat-bottom polystyrene NBS 384-well microplates (Corning, Corning, NY). To initiate the experiment, an equal volume of 2× Novo-TRX was added to 2× GyrB to produce a final concentration of 40 nM Novo-TRX and 25, 50, or 100 nM GyrB. The level of FP was determined using an Analyst HT plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) by exciting at 560 nm with polarized light through a Q595 long-pass dichroic mirror and measuring the amount of parallel and perpendicular light at 645 nm with medium attenuation and an acquisition time of 100 ms. The binding of Novo-TRX to GyrB was measured every 30 s for 70 cycles. Upon completion of the association experiments, a 125-fold excess of unlabeled novobiocin (10 μM final concentration) was added, and the change in polarization was monitored every 30 s for 70 cycles to measure the dissociation. The dissociation data were fit using a 1-phase exponential decay equation, Y = Span * exp(−K * X) + Plateau, by GraphPad Prism 4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) to determine the average half-life of dissociation.

Saturation binding experiment

Binding experiments using a constant concentration of Novo-TRX and increasing concentrations of GyrB were performed in quadruplicate to optimize the window of the assay and to determine the amount of GyrB needed to saturate the binding of Novo-TRX. A method was developed that closely mimics the desired order of addition used in the high control samples of the HTS to measure binding. A serial dilution of 3× GyrB (0–2500 nM final concentration) was made in the assay buffer and mixed with an equal volume (7 μL) of 3X Novo- TRX (40 nM final concentration). The mixture was then diluted with the assay buffer + 15% DMSO to result in the final concentrations of Novo-TRX, GyrB, and 5% DMSO. The samples were incubated for 1 h, and the FP was measured as described above. To determine the concentration resulting in 50% saturation (EC₅₀), the data were fit using the sigmoidal dose-response equation, Y = Bottom + (Top − Bottom)/(1 + 10^(LogEC₅₀ − X)), in GraphPad Prism 4.

Solvent susceptibility experiment

Standard additives for drug screening were tested for their effect on the binding of 40 nM Novo-TRX to 40 nM GyrB. The following components were tested: DMSO, Triton X-100, Tween-20, and BSA. Quadruplicate serial dilutions of a 2× stock of each component were made (10 μL final volume) in black flat-bottom polystyrene NBS 384-well microplates (Corning). To measure the FP, 15 μL of a 2× complex (80 nM Novo-TRX, 80 nM GyrB) in 2× assay buffer (50 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 1.0 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM DTT, 10% glycerol) was added to 15 μL of a 2× serial dilution of the various components (20 μL total volume, final concentration of 40 nM Novo-TRX/40 nM GyrB in assay buffer) and incubated covered for 1 h at 25 °C (room temperature). After the incubation, the FP signal was measured as described above.

HTS of a small chemical library

A small chemical library comprising 1040 FDA-approved drugs (1 replicate of each) and 80 additional antibiotics (3 replicates of each) was used to validate the use of the GyrB FP assay in identifying inhibitors of the ATP binding pocket through HTS. The library was screened twice using different preparations of GyrB. Compounds were screened in a 384-well format at a final concentration of 10 μM. Each plate was composed of 320 test compounds, 32 negative controls (5% DMSO), and 32 positive controls (10 μM novobiocin). To perform the screen, 14 μL of a 1.5× master mix of 60 nM Novo- TRX/60 nM GyrB was added to all the wells using the WellMate bulk liquid dispenser (Thermo Scientific). The PlateMate Plus liquid handler (Thermo Scientific) was then used to add 7 μL of the positive and negative controls to the plate, and then 7 μL of the test compounds in 15% DMSO was added to the plates, resulting in a final concentration of 40 nM Novo-TRX, 40 nM GyrB, 10 μM compound, and 5% DMSO. The plates were incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and the FP signal was measured as described above. The Z′ factor, Z factor, and signal-to-noise (S/N) and signal-to-background (S/B) ratios were calculated as described by Zhang et al.²⁰

Dose-response experiment

The ability of the hits identified in the HTS to disrupt the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB was confirmed using an FP dose-response experiment. The potent smallmolecule inhibitor, N-ethyl-N′-[7-(2-pyridinyl)-5-(3-pyridinyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl]-urea (Vertex-13), was synthesized as described²¹ and used as an additional control to validate the assay. In brief, 40 nM Novo-TRX was used along with 40 nM GyrB in black 384-well plates. Quadruplicate stocks of the compounds were made by first diluting the compound (stored in 100% DMSO) 10-fold into the assay buffer + 15% DMSO, then serially diluting 3-fold with assay buffer + 15% DMSO to yield 3× compound concentration; 7 μL of the compounds was then mixed with 14 μL of a 1.5× mixture of Novo-TRX/GyrB to give a final volume of 21 μL and 5% DMSO. The FP was read after a 1-h incubation at room temperature as described above. The background signal was subtracted and the FP signal was normalized to the DMSO control. Data were plotted and fitted, and the concentrations resulting in 50% inhibition (IC₅₀) were calculated using the sigmoidal dose-response equation in the GraphPad Prism 4 software.

Gyrase activity assay

Gyrase activity was measured using the purified E. coli DNA Gyrase and Relaxed DNA kit (Topogen, Port Orange, FL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the E. coli gyrase holoenzyme was incubated with 0.5 μg of the relaxed pHOT1 DNA for 1 h at 37 °C, and the level of supercoiling was measured by agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA was visualized with ethidium bromide staining.

Results and Discussion

Design of FP assay for GyrB

Although enzymatic assays for GyrB exist, an equilibrium binding assay suitable for HTS would have several advantages. Since the holoenzyme is a heterotetramer (A₂B₂), enzymatic assays require the recombinant production of both the GyrA and GyrB subunits and then subsequent mixing to form the active complex. The enzymatic assays have the potential to identify inhibitors at multiple binding sites. A homogeneous equilibrium binding assay, such as FP, requires minimal reagent addition steps and can be used to efficiently identify inhibitors of the GyrB ATP binding site in an HTS format.

The assay design strategy was to use the natural product novobiocin, which is known to tightly bind into the ATP binding site of GyrB, and tether a fluorescent dye off of a solventexposed position of the molecule. Labeling small-molecule ligands with fluorescent dyes is less common for FP assays since the labeling chemistry often results in substantial increases in molecular weight and alterations of molecular properties. In the case of novobiocin, it was hypothesized that such an approach would be feasible since the ligand is relatively large (612 Da), and crystal structures of novobiocin bound to GyrB have revealed the precise binding mode of the ligand, which can be used to identify optimal attachment points. A key advantage of such a system is that the size discrepancy between novobiocin (<1 kDa) and the purified full-length GyrB (92.5 kDa) should be reflected by a large change in polarization values upon binding.

Design and synthesis of Novo-TRX

The crystal structure of novobiocin bound to GyrB (PDB entry 1KIJ) reveals that most of the molecule is deeply buried within the protein active site, with the exception of the phenolic benzamide ring, and the proposed modification was modeled in the active site to confirm solvent accessibility of the attached moiety (see supplemental data online at http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/by/supplemental-data). Since the phenol group was directly interacting with an aspartic acid residue (Asp80 on 1KIJ), the ortho position of this ring was the ideal position at which to attach a fluorescent labeling group. This position of novobiocin was specifically labeled using a Mannich reaction, which is selective for aromatic ring positions ortho to a phenol group, and can be carried out under neutral conditions. Novobiocin is known to degrade under either basic or acidic conditions, so the neutral conditions of the Mannich reaction were ideal for the conjugation chemistry.

The novobiocin sodium reacted with formaldehyde and methyl-amine to give a reactive novobiocin methylamine intermediate that could be conjugated to various electrophilic fluorescent dyes (see supplemental data online at http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/by/supplemental-data). The novobiocin derivative was coupled to the long-wavelength rhodamine derivative, Texas Red, since its excitation/emission maxima (595/615 nm) are in a range that reduces the chances of optical interference from screening compounds. The novobiocin methylamine was reacted with Texas Red–X succinimidyl ester with base and then purified using HPLC to yield the pure probe Novo-TRX.

Equilibrium binding experiment

Kinetic experiments were performed to determine the time needed for the binding of Novo-TR X to GyrB to reach equilibrium. The experiment examined both the association and dissociation components of the interaction in real time (Fig. 1). To begin, increasing concentrations of GyrB (25, 50, and 100 nM) were mixed with 40 nM Novo-TR X, and the FP signal was monitored every 30 s until equilibrium was reached. The binding of Novo-TR X to GyrB results in an increase in the FP signal over time. As anticipated, the rate of association was faster with higher concentrations of GyrB, as evidenced by the larger initial mP values due to the time resolution of the plate reader. For all reactions, equilibrium was reached by 1000 s (~17 min). To establish that the observed binding was specific, a 125-fold excess (10 μM) of unlabeled novobiocin was added to the samples, and the change in FP signal was measured in real time. The large excess of unlabeled novobiocin was able to compete better than the Novo-TR X for binding to GyrB, and the FP signal decreased over time. As with the association experiments, the new binding equilibrium was reached by roughly 1000 s after the addition of the unlabeled novobiocin. A 1-phase exponential decay equation was used to determine that the average half-life of dissociation was 230 s for the 3 concentrations of GyrB; the association reaction was too fast to determine accurate rates. The ability to monitor binding events in real time in a homogeneous solution is a major advantage of FP over other binding assays that require a separation step to measure the interaction. Binding experiments, including the HTS, were incubated for 60 min before the FP signal was measured to guarantee that equilibrium had been reached in the assay.

FIG. 1

Equilibration studies of the interaction of Novo-TRX and GyrB. Kinetic experiments were performed to determine the time needed for binding of Novo-TRX and GyrB to reach equilibrium. Equal volumes of 2× Novo-TRX were mixed with 2× GyrB (more ...)

Saturation binding experiment

Experiments were performed to determine the concentration of GyrB that was necessary to reach 100% saturation of binding to Novo-TRX. Preliminary experiments performed with concentrations of Novo-TRX ranging from 1 to 80 nM determined that 20 to 80 nM Novo-TRX resulted in the best window of the assay and Z′ value (see supplemental data online at http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/by/supplemental-data). Lower concentrations of Novo-TRX resulted in increases in the baseline FP signal. To keep the concentrations of GyrB as low as possible without jeopardizing the reproducibility, 40 nM Novo-TRX was chosen for HTS because it was slightly more consistent than 20 nM Novo-TRX. To determine the strength of the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB, increasing concentrations of GyrB were incubated with 40 nM Novo-TRX for 1 h to ensure that the binding was at equilibrium. On the basis of the crystal structure, we predicted that the addition of the fluorophore would result in a minimal perturbation of the binding. The resulting binding data were fit, and the EC₅₀ was calculated to be 17.5 ± 0.02 nM (Fig. 2). Beyond verifying the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB, the saturation curve was also used to determine the concentrations of GyrB and Novo- TRX that would be most suitable for the assay in an HTS. Concentrations that resulted in ~80% saturation of binding were chosen.

FIG. 2

Saturation binding experiments for the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB. The homogeneous binding of Novo-TRX to GyrB was measured under equilibrium conditions to determine the amount of GyrB needed to saturate binding. Increasing concentrations (0–2500 (more ...)

Solvent susceptibility experiment

Before performing HTS, we tested common solvents and additives for their effect on the binding of Novo-TRX to GyrB using the FP binding assay. The concentration of 40 nM Novo- TRX and 40 nM GyrB was chosen so that binding was roughly 80% saturated. The complex was then incubated with increasing concentrations of DMSO, Triton X-100, Tween-20, and BSA. DMSO, which is commonly used as a solvent for the compounds in a chemical library, had a minimal effect on binding at percentages up to 10% (v/v). Understanding what levels of DMSO could be tolerated by the assay was important, especially in an HTS for small fragments that may have low affinity for the binding site and will need to be tested at higher concentrations (>50 μM). The nonionic detergents, Triton X-100 and Tween-20, also only slightly perturbed binding even at percentages close to 10% (Fig. 3A). Additional studies using the detergents in saturation binding experiments demonstrated that the detergents significantly raised the background of the assay (data not shown). It is likely that the level of the signal observed at the highest concentrations of the detergents is equivalent to the background caused by the detergent. It is also possible that the detergents were able to bind to Novo-TRX and increase the FP signal. BSA was well tolerated in the assay up to concentrations around 1 μM; higher concentrations resulted in nonspecific binding (Fig. 3B).

FIG. 3

The effect of common additives on the binding of Novo-TRX to GyrB. Common buffer additives were tested for their ability to alter the interaction of 40 nM Novo-TRX with 40 nM GyrB in a homogeneous fluorescence polarization (FP) binding assay. The average (more ...)

HTS of a small chemical library

As a proof-of-principle test for the ability of the FP assay to identify inhibitors of the F. tularensis GyrB at the ATP binding domain, the assay was used to screen a small chemical library consisting of 1040 FDA-approved compounds and 80 additional antibiotics (Fig. 4A-C). The library was large enough to test the statistical robustness of the assay using multiple liquid handlers that would be required for a large-scale screen. The screen was repeated with a new preparation of GyrB to demonstrate the reproducibility of the assay. The library was chosen because novobiocin was present in multiple locations and would serve as a positive control in the HTS. The compounds were screened at a concentration of 10 μM against a complex of 40 nM Novo-TRX and 40 nM GyrB in 5% DMSO. The Z′ factor, Z factor, and S/N and S/B ratios were calculated as described by Zhang et al.²⁰ The Z′ factor and Z factor are statistical measures used to determine the quality of the controls and entire data set, respectively. Values between 0.5 and 1.0 indicate that there is significant separation between the high and low signal. The large window of the assay (the distance between the high and low controls), along with the highly consistent data points, resulted in a very robust, reproducible screen (Z′ = 0.8). Both screening efforts had similar Z′ factors, even though the control values are slightly different. The variation in the values between screens is most likely due to differences in purity or activity of the protein preparation used for the screen. In both screens, 8 compounds were identified that decreased the binding of 40 nM Novo-TRX to 40 nM GyrB by greater than 40%: 4 internal novobiocin controls and 4 members of the anthracycline family of cancer chemotherapeutics (doxorubicin, idarubicin, epirubicin, and daunorubicin). This family is known to have anti–topoisomerase II activity, although it is thought that this activity is through DNA intercalation.^23–26

FIG. 4

High-throughput screening (HTS) of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved drugs for inhibitors of Novo-TRX binding to GyrB. A small HTS of a library of FDA-approved compounds and 80 additional antibiotics (in triplicate) was repeated twice (more ...)

Dose-response experiment

The ability of the hits from the HTS to prevent the interaction of Novo-TRX with GyrB was confirmed using a dose-response experiment. Increasing concentrations of the compounds were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with 40 nM Novo-TRX and 40 nM GyrB before the FP signal was measured. The GyrB inhibitor, Vertex-13,²¹ was included in the dose-response assay as a positive control to further validate the FP assay with a small-molecule inhibitor that is structurally different from novobiocin. The IC₅₀ was determined by fitting the data using the sigmoidal dose-response equation, as described above (Fig. 5). The IC₅₀ was determined to be 33, 310, 1270, 1580, 1460, and 393 nM for novobiocin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, daunorubicin, and Vertex-13, respectively. Although Vertex-13 is more potent against Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli gyrase than novobiocin,²¹ it was found to be approximately 10-fold less potent in the F. tularensis system. This difference in potency could result from structural differences in the ATP binding site of F. tularensis.²²

FIG. 5

The EC₅₀ of hits from high-throughput screening. Dose-response experiments for the hits from the screen and the small-molecule GyrB inhibitor Vertex-13 were performed using the fluorescence polarization (FP) assay to monitor the inhibition of the binding (more ...)

Gyrase activity assay

The hits were tested in a secondary activity assay to determine if they could prevent the conversion of relaxed plasmid DNA to supercoiled DNA by an E. coli gyrase A₂B₂ heterotetramer. Initial experiments tested the activity of 10 μM of each compound in preventing the supercoiling of 1.0 μg of relaxed DNA. As anticipated, novobiocin was able to completely prevent supercoiling by the gyrase holoenzyme, whereas none of the anthracycline compounds was able to prevent supercoiling (data not shown). The lack of activity of the anthracyclines was particularly surprising because the compounds are documented to intercalate into DNA and have anti–topoisomerase II activity.^24–26 The ability of the compounds to directly cause supercoiling along with both the gyrase and DNA competing for binding to the anthracyclines, which would result in lower concentrations of compound, most likely resulted in the false-negative activity in the first conditions tested.^27,28 In a second set of experiments, the holoenzyme was incubated with 50 μM of each compound and 0.5 μg of the relaxed DNA for 1 h at 37 °C, and the amount of supercoiling was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining (Fig. 6). DMSO was used as a vehicle control, and presupercoiled DNA alone was loaded as a negative control. A second set of reactions without the gyrase holoenzyme was used to control for supercoiling caused by the compound treatment. Under the second set of conditions, doxorubicin and epirubicin were able to inhibit supercoiling to the level of the no-gyrase control and below the DMSO control. The activity of idarubicin and daunorubicin is less clear because the level of supercoiling caused by the treatment alone is comparable to the level of supercoiling with the gyrase. Although the members of the anthracycline family are known eukaryotic topoisomerase II poisons, they have not previously been reported to directly inhibit the ATP binding domain. Future experiments testing the activity against the eukaryotic topoisomerase and other kinases will be used to determine the selectivity of any hits identified with the FP assay.

FIG. 6

A secondary Gyr activity assay to confirm hits from high- throughput screening (HTS). A secondary assay using the Escherichia coli Gyr A₂B₂ heterotetramer was used to confirm that the hits from the HTS were able to prevent the supercoiling of 0.5 μg (more ...)

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a novel FP assay that specifically measures competition for binding to the ATP binding domain of F. tularensis GyrB. The assay uses a novel binding probe, Novo-TRX, which is composed of a long-wavelength fluorescent dye conjugated to the known ligand novobiocin. This homogeneous, nonradioactive assay has been optimized for screening in a 384-well format and has demonstrated robust assay statistics (Z′ = 0.80). The stability of Novo-TRX has been demonstrated to be suitable for real-time binding kinetics studies and can be used to determine the binding kinetics of potential inhibitors. The high level of conservation in the ATP binding domain suggests that the Novo-TRX probe would be a valuable tool to study the GyrB of any bacterial species. This new methodology has been successfully used to rapidly screen a small library of compounds, and a novel mechanism for the direct inhibition of bacterial gyrase by the anthracyclines was identified and confirmed using a secondary activity assay.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Click here to view.^{(1.0M, doc)}

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported by award number U01AI082070 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.

References

1. Nollmann M, Crisona NJ, Arimondo PB. Thirty years of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase: from in vivo function to single-molecule mechanism. Biochimie. 2007;89:490–499. [PubMed]

2. Berger JM, Wang JC. Recent developments in DNA topoisomerase II structure and mechanism. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6:84–90. [PubMed]

3. Schoeffler AJ, Berger JM. Recent advances in understanding structure-function relationships in the type II topoisomerase mechanism. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:1465–1470. [PubMed]

4. Sugino A, Higgins NP, Brown PO, Peebles CL, Cozzarelli NR. Energy coupling in DNA gyrase and the mechanism of action of novobiocin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:4838–4842. [PubMed]

5. Marko O, Miha K, Tom S. Discovery and development of ATPase inhibitors of DNA gyrase as antibacterial agents. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:2033–2047. [PubMed]

6. Nakada N, Gmünder H, Hirata T, Arisawa M. Characterization of the binding site for cyclothialidine on the B subunit of DNA gyrase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:14286–14291. [PubMed]

7. Hooper DC, Wolfson JS, Ng EY, Swartz MN. Mechanisms of action of and resistance to ciprofloxacin. Am J Med. 1987;82:12–20. [PubMed]

8. Smith JT. The mode of action of 4-quinolones and possible mechanisms of resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986;18(suppl D):21–29. [PubMed]

9. Gross CH, Parsons JD, Grossman TH, Charifson PS, Bellon S, Jernee J, et al. Active-site residues of Escherichia coli DNA gyrase required in coupling ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling and amino acid substitutions leading to novobiocin resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:1037–1046. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

10. Boehm HJ, Boehringer M, Bur D, Gmuender H, Huber W, Klaus W, et al. Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. J Med Chem. 2000;43:2664–2674. [PubMed]

11. Reece RJ, Maxwell A. Tryptic fragments of the Escherichia coli DNA gyrase A protein. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:19648–19653. [PubMed]

12. Roychoudhury S, Makin KM, Twinem TL, Stanton DT, Nelson SL, Catrenich CE. Development and use of a high-throughput bacterial DNA gyrase assay to identify mammalian topoisomerase II inhibitors with whole-cell anticancer activity. J Biomol Screen. 2003;8:157–163. [PubMed]

13. Burrell MR, Burton NP, Maxwell A. A high-throughput assay for DNA topoisomerases and other enzymes, based on DNA triplex formation. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;613:257–266. [PubMed]

14. Moir DT, Ming D, Opperman T, Schweizer HP, Bowlin TL. A high-throughput, homogeneous, bioluminescent assay for Pseudomonas aeruginosa gyrase inhibitors and other DNA-damaging agents. J Biomol Screen. 2007;12:855–864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

15. Gevi M, Domenici E. A scintillation proximity assay amenable for screening and characterization of DNA gyrase B subunit inhibitors. Anal Biochem. 2002;300:34–39. [PubMed]

16. Owicki JC. Fluorescence polarization and anisotropy in high throughput screening: perspectives and primer. J Biomol Screen. 2000;5:297–306. [PubMed]

17. Roehrl MH, Wang JY, Wagner G. A general framework for development and data analysis of competitive high-throughput screens for small- molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions by fluorescence polarization. Biochemistry. 2004;43:16056–16066. [PubMed]

18. Lamour V, Hoermann L, Jeltsch JM, Oudet P, Moras D. An open conformation of the Thermus thermophilus gyrase B ATP-binding domain. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:18947–18953. [PubMed]

19. Larsson P, Oyston PC, Chain P, Chu MC, Duffield M, Fuxelius HH, et al. The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia. Nat Genet. 2005;37:153–159. [PubMed]

20. Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4:67–73. [PubMed]

21. Charifson PS, Grillot AL, Grossman TH, Parsons JD, Badia M, Bellon S, et al. Novel dual-targeting benzimidazole urea inhibitors of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV possessing potent antibacterial activity: intelligent design and evolution through the judicious use of structure-guided design and structure-activity relationships. J Med Chem. 2008;51:5243–5263. [PubMed]

22. Holdgate GA, Tunnicliffe A, Ward WH, Weston SA, Rosenbrock G, Barth PT, et al. The entropic penalty of ordered water accounts for weaker binding of the antibiotic novobiocin to a resistant mutant of DNA gyrase: a thermodynamic and crystallographic study. Biochemistry. 1997;36:9663–9673. [PubMed]

23. Gabbay EJ, Grier D, Fingerle RE, Reimer R, Levy R, Pearce SW, et al. Interaction specificity of the anthracyclines with deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1976;15:2062–2070. [PubMed]

24. Khan F, Sherwani AF, Afzal M. Chromosomal aberration and micronucleus studies of two topoisomerase (II) targeting anthracyclines. J Environ Biol. 2009;30:409–412. [PubMed]

25. Saffi J, Agnoletto MH, Guecheva TN, Batista LF, Carvalho H, Henriques JA, et al. Effect of the anti-neoplastic drug doxorubicin on XPD-mutated DNA repair-deficient human cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010;9:40–47. [PubMed]

26. Bodley A, Liu LF, Israel M, Seshadri R, Koseki Y, Giuliani FC, et al. DNA topoisomerase II–mediated interaction of doxorubicin and daunorubicin congeners with DNA. Cancer Res. 1989;49:5969–5978. [PubMed]

27. Viglasky V, Valle F, Adamcik J, Joab I, Podhradsky D, Dietler G. Anthracycline-dependent heat-induced transition from positive to negative supercoiled DNA. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:1703–1711. [PubMed]

28. Waring M. Variation of the supercoils in closed circular DNA by binding of antibiotics and drugs: evidence for molecular models involving intercalation. J Mol Biol. 1970;54:247–279. [PubMed]