Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 September 19.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3175758

A sensor for calcium uptake


Mitochondria — the cell’s power plants — increase their energy production in response to calcium signals in the cytoplasm. A regulator of the elusive mitochondrial calcium channel has now been identified.

Various stimuli generate signalling by calcium ions, a mechanism that has wide-ranging roles in biology, triggering secretion, contraction and differentiation, among other processes. Many of these processes are energy-intensive, necessitating increased production of the energy molecule ATP by cellular organelles called mitochondria. Thus, when cytoplasmic calcium signals are generated, calcium ions also enter mitochondria, where they enhance the activity of many metabolic enzymes and thereby increase ATP production1,2. But how does Ca2+ enter mitochondria? Reporting on page 291 of this issue, Perocchi et al.3 describe a protein that acts as a gatekeeper for the channel that transports Ca2+ into mitochondria — the first regulator of this channel to be identified.

The regulation of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial Ca2+ levels is tightly linked. Increased cytoplasmic levels of Ca2+ stimulate rapid uptake of the ion by mitochondria, and oscillations in Ca2+ levels in mitochondria can be observed in response to those in the cytoplasm1. When cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels are particularly high, mitochondria can act as a Ca2+ buffer, taking up and storing large amounts of the ion. Mitochondria thus modulate the dynamics of cytoplasmic Ca2+ signals and protect cells from Ca2+ overload, while simultaneously promoting longer-term increases in their own metabolic activity. In addition, excessive Ca2+ uptake by mitochondria activates pathways that lead to programmed cell death.

The delivery of cytoplasmic Ca2+ into mitochondria presents a special challenge. Unlike Ca2+ channels such as the IP3 receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) — a cellular organelle that releases this ion into the cytoplasm — the mitochondrial uptake system works in the opposite direction, against the Ca2+ concentration gradient. Years of work have revealed that Ca2+ influx into mitochondria is driven by the presence of a strong negative electrical potential across the mitochondrial inner membrane, rather than by ATP-dependent pumping (which is used to transport Ca2+ from the cytoplasm into the ER). Moreover, various studies have shown that cells have physical junctions, created by connector proteins, that hold the ER and mitochondrial membranes in close proximity, being separated by only 10–30 nanometres of aqueous space. At these junctions, local Ca2+ concentrations may reach much higher levels than elsewhere, allowing mitochondria to directly take up Ca2+ ions released from the ER4 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Ca2+ hotspots

This unique mitochondrial Ca2+-uptake channel has been termed the uniporter. It is located in the inner mitochondrial membrane — the outer membrane is freely permeable to Ca2+. The uniporter is highly sensitive to Ca2+ concentrations, which suggests that not only is this ion transported through the channel, but it also functions as a regulator that can strongly increase the channel’s activity. Once the ER is no longer releasing Ca2+ and cytoplasmic Ca2+ levels are again low, Ca2+ is moved out of the mitochondria and back into the cytoplasm by a Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NLCX)5 in the membrane, and possibly by an ion-exchange mechanism mediated by a Ca2+/H+ exchanger (LETM1)6.

The molecular identities of most Ca2+ regulatory proteins are known, but the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter has remained an enigma. To identify the uniporter and its immediate regulators, Perocchi et al.3 performed a highly focused genetic screen, considering only candidate genes that met three criteria.

First, the authors obtained their shortlist of candidates by using a catalogue of mitochondrial proteins that they had produced earlier7 and selecting proteins of the inner mitochondrial membrane — the site of the uniporter’s action. Second, they made use of evolutionary knowledge. Research in diverse organisms has established that uniporter activity is present in vertebrates and in a highly divergent branch of protozoa known as kinetoplastids, but is absent from the mitochondria of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Perocchi and colleagues therefore focused on genes encoding mitochondrial proteins that are present in vertebrates and kinetoplastids, but not in yeast. Finally, they considered only genes that are broadly expressed across mammalian cell types. Combined use of these filters left just 13 candidate genes.

From RNA interference experiments performed to identify genes necessary for Ca2+ uptake, Perocchi et al. singled out the gene encoding a protein that they name MICU1 (for mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake 1). The authors find that MICU1 triggers Ca2+ influx into mitochondria when the ion binds to two sites, known as EF hands. These EF hands provide an appealing explanation for the strong regulation of the uniporter by Ca2+. Although MICU1 could in principle be the uniporter itself, a sequence analysis shows that it probably has only one transmembrane region. As ion channels typically contain many such regions, MICU1 is more likely to be the Ca2+ sensor that regulates uniporter activity.

If proven correct, Perocchi and co-workers’ identification of the Ca2+ sensor is a significant advance, because it provides a path to identifying the uniporter channel itself, as well as being a starting point for mechanistic studies. For example, how do the EF hands of MICU1 ‘gate’ the activity of the channel? Also, previous work suggests that the Ca2+ sensing responsible for mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake occurs at the ER–mitochondrion junctions, and so the present study offers experimental possibilities for studying Ca2+ signalling at these junctions.

Perocchi and colleagues’ work provides a compelling example of the power of comparative genomics. With the number of sequenced genomes of various organisms steadily increasing, and a wealth of data available on the phenotypic properties of different organisms, similar strategies may provide an effective route to discovering the missing molecular components of crucial cellular processes.


1. Hajnóczky G, Robb-Gaspers LD, Seitz MB, Thomas AP. Cell. 1995;82:415–424. [PubMed]
2. Contreras L, Drago I, Zampese E, Pozzan T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1797:607–618. [PubMed]
3. Perocchi F, et al. Nature. 2010;467:291–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Rizzuto R, et al. Science. 1998;280:1763–1766. [PubMed]
5. Palty R, et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:436–441. [PubMed]
6. Jiang D, Zhao L, Clapham DE. Science. 2009;326:144–147. [PubMed]
7. Calvo SE, Mootha VK. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2010 advance online publication [PubMed]