PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Phys Act Health. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 1.
Published in final edited form as:
J Phys Act Health. 2011 September; 8(7): 994–1003.
PMCID: PMC3175100
NIHMSID: NIHMS241206

Ambulatory Activity Associations with Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk Factors in Smokers

Abstract

Background

We examined the association between ambulatory activity and biological markers of health in smokers.

Methods

Baseline data from 985 subjects enrolled in a pharmacologic smoking cessation trial were examined. Body size, blood pressure, total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total and small LDL particles, LDL size, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1c were assessed in relation to pedometer-assessed ambulatory activity, as was the odds of metabolic syndrome and CRP > 3 mg/L. Effect modification by gender was examined.

Results

Only waist circumference was lower with greater steps/day in the men and women combined (ptrend <0.001). No other significant relationships were noted in men, while women with ≥7500 steps/day had lower weight, BMI, CRP, TG, total and small LDL particles compared to those with <7500 steps/day. These women also had 62% and 43% lower odds of metabolic syndrome and elevated CRP, respectively, compared to the less active women. Adjustment for BMI attenuated all the associations seen in women.

Conclusions

Greater ambulatory activity is associated with lower levels of metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in female smokers which may, in part, be mediated by a reduction in BMI.

Keywords: physical activity, walking, smoking, biomarkers, body mass index

Approximately, 43.4 million adults in the United States are current cigarette smokers.1 Cigarette smoking is associated with increased risk of several diseases including cancer, cardiovascular, and respiratory disease. Adverse health effects of cigarette smoking account for an estimated 438,000 or nearly 1 of every 5 deaths/year in the United States.2

It is clear that smokers are at risk for multiple negative health outcomes.3 It is also clear that smokers differ in the expression of such risk, so it is important to identify factors that are associated with especially negative health outcomes amongst smokers. Such factors could be used to focus health risk assessments on at-risk populations and perhaps also to motivate quit attempts amongst those at highest risk. Moreover, it is of theoretical interest to identify factors that may modulate risk. Risk factors identified in general populations may not translate directly to populations of smokers since smoking may interact with such factors to modify the relationships.

Physical activity may effectively predict health risk amongst smokers. There is clear evidence that in the general population physical inactivity is an important risk factor for multiple negative health outcomes,4 and conversely, physical activity produces many beneficial health effects including reduced total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG),5 inflammation,6 and blood pressure,7 and improved high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)8 and glycemic control.9 It has also been shown to reduce levels of atherogenic lipoproteins including total LDL particles, small LDL particles, and to increase LDL size.10 Physical activity is also associated with a reduced risk of metabolic syndrome, which is a clustering of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors.11;12 It is unknown, however, whether physical activity similarly affects these factors amongst smokers who typically manifest more negative biomarker profiles and who tend to be more sedentary than nonsmokers,13;14 nor if the relationships are similar in male and female smokers.

Previous research suggests a possible association between physical activity and health status in smokers. Epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated associations between low physical activity and all-cause mortality risk while controlling for smoking.15-17Additionally, physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease in male and female smokers,18;19 and with a decreased risk of many cancers including lung cancer, although this latter relationship may represent residual confounding by cigarette smoking.20;21 We hypothesized that smokers who took more steps per day would have a better profile of biomarkers that are related to these various outcomes compared to smokers who took fewer steps per day. Specifically, we evaluated the relationship between objectively measured ambulation and body size, blood pressure, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, LDL particle number and size, TG, C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and creatinine in Wisconsin smokers participating in a pharmacologic smoking cessation clinical trial.

Methods

Study Population

Study participants were enrolled in the Wisconsin Smokers' Health Study (WSHS), a 3-yr smoking cessation trial examining specific pharmacotherapies (nicotine lozenge, nicotine patch, sustained-release buproprion, and various combinations of the therapies), conducted in Madison and Milwaukee, WI in 2005.22 The long-term objective of the WSHS was to reveal how successful and unsuccessful quit attempts are related to important physiological and psychosocial outcomes, with consideration for individual differences and other modifiable risk factors such as physical activity. Exercise was not a part of the cessation trial, but subject physical activity levels were measured. Data for this analysis (performed in 2008-2009) came from baseline data (2005-2007) of WSHS participants (n=1,504). Participants were recruited through television, radio, and newspaper ads; flyers; earned media, and television and radio interviews. Inclusion criteria included smoking > 9 cigarettes/day on average for at least the past 6 months, having an alveolar carbon monoxide level greater than 9 ppm, and being motivated to quit smoking (≥ 8 on a 1-10-point scale where 10 is ‘highly motivated to quit’). Exclusion criteria included using other non-cigarette forms of tobacco, taking buproprion, having current psychosis or schizophrenia, as well as contraindications to the various pharmocotherapies including high alcohol consumption (6 drinks/day on 6 or 7 days of the week), a history of seizure, high blood pressure (>160/100 mmHg), bipolar disorder, an eating disorder, a recent cardiac event or allergies to any of the medications. This study was approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Human Subjects Institutional Review Board and subjects gave their informed consent to participate.

Ambulatory Activity Assessment

Subjects wore a Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer for at least 7 consecutive days within one month of their quit date. Subjects had pre-quit data, post-quit data, or both. Subjects were fitted with the pedometer on their waistband over their right, mid-thigh, and accuracy of the placement was checked with a 20-step test. Placement was altered (moved closer to the hip) to achieve 20 ± 1 steps on the test. Subjects were asked to wear the pedometer during all waking hours, except for water-based activities such as bathing or swimming, and to record their wear times and steps taken daily. Pedometers and logs were returned at their next clinic visit. The data were cleaned and scored using several criteria: days with <10 hours of wear time or days with > 50,000 steps or < 500 steps were excluded; subjects with <3 valid days of wear were excluded, as <3 days of wear is not a reliable measure of normal ambulatory activity level;23 and subjects with <2,000 steps/day who also reported malfunctioning pedometers were excluded. After these exclusions, 960 of the study's 1,504 participants had valid pre-quit data and 1,032 had valid baseline data from either pre- or post-quit. An average steps/day was calculated for each subject, with subjects placed into sedentary, low active, somewhat active, and active categories based on recently published guidelines, corresponding to <5,000, 5,000-7,499, 7,500-9,999, and ≥ 10,000 steps/day.24 Analysis using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test showed there was no significant difference in steps taken between pre-quit and total baseline pedometry data (p = 0.47). Additionally, results were unchanged when limited to the 960 with pre-quit data; therefore, our analysis initially included the 1,032 subjects who had valid pre- or post-quit baseline data (69%of the subjects enrolled in WSHS).

Health Status Assessment

Blood samples were collected after a 12 hour fast during which subjects refrained from smoking. Blood was processed and plasma was stored at −70 °C for the analysis of the lipids and lipoproteins. All other assays were performed on fresh samples. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (LipoScience, Inc., Raleigh, NC) was used to measure very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), LDL, HDL and mean particle sizes, and from these, total TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C were estimated. Coefficients of variation (% cv) were as follows: VLDL (4.3%), LDL (3.7%), HDL (1.5%), TG (1.1%), HDL-C (1.1%), small LDL particles (9.1%), and mean LDL particle size (0.6%). Assays for high-sensitivity CRP, creatinine, FPG, and HbA1c were performed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Hospital and Clinics Laboratory, and % cv's were 2.5-4.2%, 1.1-7.8%, 1.6-2.5%, 1.1-1.6%, respectively. Standard sphygmomanometry methodology was used for blood pressure assessment. Weight and height were measured while barefoot or in stocking feet. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest. We created categories to indicate presence of metabolic syndrome and high risk CRP. Metabolic syndrome was defined using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines (NCEP ATP III)25 updated in 200426 which defines metabolic syndrome as having 3 or more of the following conditions: WC ≥ 102 cm in men or ≥ 88 cm in women; TG ≥150 mg/dL or drug treatment for elevated levels; HDL-C <40 mg/dL in men and <50 mg/dL in women or drug treatment for reduced levels; BP ≥130 mm Hg systolic or ≥85 mm Hg diastolic or drug treatment for elevated levels; or FPG ≥100 mg/dL or drug treatment for diabetes mellitus. High risk CRP was defined as > 3 mg/L.

Measurement of Covariates

Age, gender, race, marital status, income, education level, smoking history, and alcohol use were measured with questionnaires. Saturated fat and sodium intake were measured using the Willett Food Frequency Questionnaire and adjusted for total caloric intake. All medications used were recorded, and any use of blood pressure, lipid lowering, diabetes, or anti-inflammatory medication was noted. Leisure-time and total moderate-vigorous physical activity was measured using the long form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).27 Chronic conditions (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes/high blood sugar, and chronic lung disease) were assessed with the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication Composite International Diagnostic Interview (NCS-R-CIDI), a modified version of the World Health Organization's CIDI.28

Statistical Analysis

Data were tested for normality and log-transformed when necessary for parametric statistical analysis. Variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), as appropriate. Analysis of covariance and general linear models were used to calculate least-squared means across category of steps/day, and tests for linear trend were performed using an ordered categorical variable. Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression to estimate the odds of having metabolic syndrome or high risk CRP by ambulatory activity category. We used stepwise modeling, considering relevant covariates with and without adjustment for BMI, which could be a mediator of some of the associations. Marital status, education level, income, alcohol use, sodium intake, moderate-vigorous physical activity, pedometer wear-time, and saturated fat intake were not included in the final models as these variables did not change the significance of the biological marker terms or reduce the magnitude of the difference appreciably between high and low ambulatory activity categories. Of the 1,032 subjects with valid pedometry data, we further excluded 47 subjects who were missing covariates of interest including age, sex, race, smoking history, chronic conditions, and body mass index (BMI), leaving 985 subjects for analysis. In an attempt to further control potential confounding, models excluding those individuals with a history of specific diseases or those taking relevant medications were also run. To examine effect modification by gender, ambulatory activity was collapsed into <7500 or ≥7500 steps/day, and the cross-product term of the activity category and gender were tested in models. Additionally, models stratified by gender were run, and if effect modification appeared present, then the stratified models are presented. We also examined effect modification using the median steps/day in men and women separately as the cutpoints, but results were not different from the 7500 step/day cutpoint presented here. Spearman correlations were used to examine the association between steps/day and self-reported moderate-vigorous activity, and separately, leisure time activity from the IPAQ. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). We present specific p-values, and make note of associations at the α=0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels due to the multiple comparisons made.

Results

Characteristics of the 985 subjects from the WSHS included and excluded in the current analysis are presented in Table 1. The 519 subjects from the WSHS without valid pedometry data were similar to the 985 subjects included in our analysis in regards to age, gender, race, pack-years of smoking, BMI, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. Characteristics of the 985 subjects included in the analysis, stratified by gender, are shown in Table 2. On average, the women fell into the “low active” category while the men on average were “somewhat active.” Median laboratory values were within their normal ranges, with the exception of HDL, which tended to be low.

Table 1
Characteristics of Wisconsin Smokers' Health Study participants who were included and excluded from the current analysis.
Table 2
Subject Characteristics (N = 985)

Gender significantly affected the relationship between ambulatory activity and many of the biological markers examined. Table 3 presents the results for analyses in which no effect modification was noted. Waist circumference was significantly lower with greater steps/day among the men and women combined, and there were lower levels of DBP and TC/HDL with greater steps/day that were attenuated with BMI adjustment. No dose-response relationship was seen for SBP, creatinine, FPG, HbA1c, HDL, the TC/HDL ratio, or LDL particle size. After removing subjects with self-reported hypertension or those taking blood pressure medications, the relationship between ambulatory activity and SBP was somewhat stronger (ptrend =0.03), while that for DBP was substantially stronger (ptrend <0.01), with a 3 mmHg difference in DBP from <5,000 to ≥10,000 steps/day.

Table 3
Mean Level of Health Indices By Steps/Day Level in Men and Women Combined

Results for biomarkers in which effect modification by gender was present are shown in Table 4. Women taking at least 7500 steps/day had significantly lower weight, BMI, CRP, triglycerides, total and small LDL particles compared to those with <7500 steps/day, but this was not true in men. Further adjustment for BMI attenuated the CRP, triglyceride, and LDL particle relationships in the women. Removal of subjects reporting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use or chronic lung disease attenuated the CRP relationship in women, but the number of women left in the analysis was substantially reduced. Removal of subjects with other relevant conditions or medication use did not alter any of the other results presented in Tables Tables33 or or44.

Table 4
Mean Level of Health Indices By Steps/Day Level Stratified By Gender

We also saw effect modification by gender for the relationships between ambulatory activity and metabolic syndrome (pintxn<0.001) and high-risk CRP (pintxn=0.06). There was no relationship between ambulatory activity and either of these conditions in men. Among the women, those with ≥ 7500 or more steps/day had a 62% lower odds of metabolic syndrome compared to those with < 7500 steps day, that was still statistically significant (45% lower) with further BMI adjustment (Table 5). Higher ambulatory activity was also associated with a reduced odds of having high risk CRP, with women taking ≥ 7500 steps/day having a statistically significant 43% lower odds of the condition compared to those with <7500 steps/day. This relationship was attenuated after adjustment for BMI (OR=0.80, 95%CI=0.48-1.31).

Table 5
Odds ratios for Metabolic Syndrome & High Risk CRP by Level of Physical Activity & Gender

Self-reported pedometer wear-time was somewhat longer in the men than the women (878 ± 91 vs. 848 ± 81 min/day, respectively), but its inclusion in the models did not change the results. We examined how total steps/day were associated with self-reported activity in men and women separately. Associations were weak for leisure-time activity (r=0.10, p=0.05 in men; r=0.19, p<0.001 in women), while total moderate-vigorous activity was more strongly associated with steps/day in men (r=0.38, p<0.001) than in women (r=0.22, p<0.001).

Discussion

In this cross-sectional analysis of individuals enrolled in the WSHS, greater ambulatory activity was associated with lower waist circumference, and a tendency towards lower DBP and TC/HDL-C ratio in both men and women. Solely among women, a higher level of steps/day was associated with lower body weight, BMI, CRP, triglycerides, total LDL and small LDL particle concentration, but these associations were explained in part by the lower BMIs of the active individuals. Similarly, women taking ≥ 7,500 steps/day had a 62% lower odds of metabolic syndrome and a 43% lower odds of high CRP, that was attenuated after adjustment for BMI, and not present in the men. Although other studies have examined the relationship between physical activity and biological markers of health, to our knowledge this is the first study to examine this relationship specifically in smokers.

Our results regarding the association between ambulatory activity and the various health markers are reasonably consistent with prior work. Physical activity, including ambulatory activity, has been shown to be inversely related to BMI, LDL-C, TC/HDL-C, LDL lipoproteins, triglycerides, and blood pressure.10;29-36 We found very strong relationships between ambulatory activity and metabolic syndrome, consistent with what has been seen in a population of older adults,33 and for physical activity in general.12 The relationship between ambulatory activity and inflammation was also strong, consistent with previous studies.37;38 Overall, the associations we saw in this group of smokers were similar to what has previously been seen in other populations.

The differential associations we noted for women vs. men are somewhat surprising, but may be attributed to measurement issues. Although we objectively measured ambulatory activity, we cannot determine characteristics of that activity such as the intensity or pattern of steps. A previous Australian study noted that men who accumulated ≥ 10,000 steps day were more likely to report vigorous work activity or blue-collar occupations compared to less active men, while in women, the 10,000 steps/day goal was more likely to be met among those participating in ≥150 minutes of leisure-time activity/week.39 Our data are consistent with this finding in that the steps/day were more strongly associated with total moderate-vigorous activity in men than in women. Although correlations with total leisure-time activity were weak overall, they were somewhat stronger in women. Although strong inferences cannot be made as to the intensity of the actual steps recorded, these results suggest that the intensity and/or quality of the steps may have been different, such that a step in the men was not equivalent to a step in the women. Additionally, our men recorded substantially more steps/day than the women such that far fewer men were considered low active than the women. Although these measurement differences may underlie our results, it is also possible that there are biological reasons that explain the differences we saw among male and female smokers, and this appears worthy of further investigation.

After adjustment for BMI, the associations between greater ambulatory activity and many of the biological markers were attenuated; however, this was not unexpected as excess body weight may actually mediate some of these relationships. The interrelationship of activity and body fatness is complex and not always able to be clarified by linear regression modeling. Various studies have found that the relationship between physical activity and inflammation is attenuated after adjustment for fatness.40;41 Increased body size has also been shown to be associated with lipid biomarkers, with higher BMI more strongly associated with higher LDL-C, TC, and lower HDL-C than physical inactivity.40 In our study, greater ambulatory activity was related to a better LDL lipoprotein profile, which was in part related to BMI as was expected. Our results suggest that body fatness is an important mediator of the relationships we examined.

We saw statistically significant associations with many of the biomarkers even though the participants had reasonably healthy biomarker profiles. Participants in the WSHS were recently compared to non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in 2005-2006.42 Smokers in the WSHS had lower levels of TC (183.8 mg/dL vs. 202.5 mg/dL; p < 0.05), TG (142.2 mg/dL vs. 158.0 mg/dL; p < 0.05), and FG (94.9 ± vs. 102.3; p < 0.05) compared to smokers in NHANES, suggesting that smokers seeking cessation treatment may have a different health profile than current smokers in the general population. Consequently, it is possible that the association between greater ambulatory activity and health status would be stronger in a population of smokers not seeking treatment.

Understanding how much ambulatory activity is related to improved biomarkers of health is an important public health issue. Although limited by the observational nature of our study, we can still examine what level of ambulatory activity is associated with an improved biomarker profile. Waist circumference was significantly lower with ambulatory activity >5,000 steps/day; however, other significant relationships were only seen with higher levels of activity. DBP, FG, and TC/HDL-C were significantly lower in men and women with >10,000 steps/day vs. those with <5,000 steps/day. Among the women only, where we used the 7,500 step/day cutpoint, that level of activity was associated with significantly lower weight, BMI, CRP, TC, LDL particles, and small LDL particles. Additionally, this level of activity was related to substantial and significant reductions in the risk of metabolic syndrome and high-risk levels of CRP. These associations with what is considered to be the “somewhat active” category are consistent with prior studies, although relationships with specific biomarkers have varied.43-45 This suggests that ambulatory activity may not need to be >10,000 steps/day for health benefits to be accrued.

The main limitation of this study is its cross-sectional design, which does not allow us to make strong causal inferences about the observed relations. Also, reactivity to wearing the pedometer, in which subjects will increase their activity when they know they are being monitored, may also be a problem. A recent study suggested that pedometer reactivity was greatest when participants used an unsealed pedometer and recorded their steps/day as our subjects did.46 Therefore, it's possible we overestimated subjects' normal activity levels which would have attenuated predictive relations. However, it's also possible we underestimated activity as pedometers cannot capture non-ambulatory activities like swimming and cycling. As mentioned previously, another limitation is that we could not measure the intensity or duration of the steps taken. Finally, only 69% of the subjects enrolled in the WSHS had valid pedometry data, and therefore our results could be subject to selection bias. However, we did compare those with and without valid pedometry data and the subjects appeared to have similar demographic characteristics. Although it seems low, this 69% figure is similar to the proportion of samples with valid pedometry data seen in prior population-based studies in Colorado (68%)47 and Australia (70%).39

Strengths of this study include the objective measurement of ambulatory activity to assess daily physical activity. Most prior studies have usually measured physical activity through self-report, which is subject to validity issues and recall bias.48 Also, our study measures cumulative ambulatory activity, not just purposeful exercise, which has great translatable potential. With further work, the potential recommendations for a steps/day level has great public health appeal in that walking is a very common activity, people can accumulate steps throughout a day, and pedometers are reasonably cheap and easy to use for personal measurement.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the relations between ambulatory activity and health outcomes observed in smokers are similar to those observed in nonsmokers. Greater activity was associated with lower waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure, and TC/HDL-C in the total sample, as well as lower weight, BMI, CRP, triglycerides, total LDL and small LDL particle concentration, and metabolic syndrome in women. These associations were mediated, in part, by a reduction in body mass index. These results suggest that the benefits of physical activity are not negated by smoking; however, these findings do not in any way suggest that physical activity neutralizes the harms of smoking. Quitting smoking will always be the most beneficial action a smoker can take regardless of his/her activity level.

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Megan Piper and Paul Kohn of the Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention at the University of Wisconsin for their assistance with data management.

Funding Source/Trials Registration

This work was supported in part by grant P50 DA019706 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and by 1UL1RR025011 from the National Center for Research Resources, NIH, to the University of Wisconsin-Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention. Medications for the study were provided by GlaxoSmithKline. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (No. NCT00332644).

References

1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1221–1226. [PubMed]
2. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. 2004
3. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) The Surgeon General's 1989 Report on Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989;38(Suppl 2):1–32. [PubMed]
4. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; Atlanta, GA.: 1996. pp. 1–259.
5. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, et al. Effect of leisure time physical activity on blood lipid levels: the ATTICA study. Coron Artery Dis. 2003;14:533–539. [PubMed]
6. Ford E. Does exercise reduce inflammation? Physical activity and C-reactive protein among U.S. adults. Epidemiology. 2002;13:561–568. [PubMed]
7. Moreau KL, Degarmo R, Langley J, et al. Increasing daily walking lowers blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001;33:1825–1831. [PubMed]
8. Duncan GE, Anton SD, Sydeman SJ, et al. Prescribing exercise at varied levels of intensity and frequency: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2362–2369. [PubMed]
9. Hayes C, Kriska A. Role of physical activity in diabetes management and prevention. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:S19–S23. [PubMed]
10. Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, et al. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1483–1492. [PubMed]
11. Carroll S, Dudfield M. What is the relationship between exercise and metabolic abnormalities? A review of the metabolic syndrome. Sports Med. 2004;34:371–418. [PubMed]
12. Lakka TA, Laaksonen DE. Physical activity in prevention and treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:76–88. [PubMed]
13. Sharma SB, Dwivedi S, Prabhu KM, Singh G, Kumar N, Lal MK. Coronary risk variables in young asymptomatic smokers. Indian J Med Res. 2005;122:205–210. [PubMed]
14. Sinha AK, Misra GC, Patel DK. Effect of cigarette smoking on lipid profile in the young. J Assoc Physicians India. 1995;43:185–188. [PubMed]
15. Blair SN, Kohl HW, III, Paffenbarger RS, Jr., Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262:2395–2401. [PubMed]
16. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:793–801. [PubMed]
17. Paffenbarger RS, Jr., Hyde RT, Wing AL, Hsieh CC. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:605–613. [PubMed]
18. Manson JE, Hu FB, Rich-Edwards JW, et al. A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:650–658. [PubMed]
19. Hedblad B, Ogren M, Isacsson SO, Janzon L. Reduced cardiovascular mortality risk in male smokers who are physically active. Results from a 25-year follow-up of the prospective population study men born in 1914. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:893–899. [PubMed]
20. Mao Y, Pan S, Wu Wen S, Johnson K. Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Physical activity and the risk of lung cancer in Canada. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:564–575. [PubMed]
21. Thune I, Lund E. The influence of physical activity on lung-cancer risk. A prospective study of 81,516 men and women. Int J Cancer. 1997;70:57–62. [PubMed]
22. Piper ME, Smith SS, Schlam TR, et al. A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of 5 Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:1253–1262. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Tudor-Locke C, Burkett L, Reis JP, Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Wilson DK. How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Prev Med. 2005;40:293–298. [PubMed]
24. Tudor-Locke C, Hatano Y, Pangrazi RP, Kang M. Revisiting “how many steps are enough?” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2008;40:S537–S543. [PubMed]
25. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143–3421. [PubMed]
26. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752. [PubMed]
27. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003;35:1381–1395. [PubMed]
28. Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU, et al. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:1069–1077. [PubMed]
29. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Walking and resting blood pressure in adults: a meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2001;33:120–127. [PubMed]
30. Chan CB, Spangler E, Valcour J, Tudor-Locke C. Cross-sectional relationship of pedometer-determined ambulatory activity to indicators of health. Obes Res. 2003;11:1563–1570. [PubMed]
31. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Walking, lipids, and lipoproteins: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Prev Med. 2004;38:651–661. [PubMed]
32. Yoshioka M, Ayabe M, Yahiro T, et al. Long-period accelerometer monitoring shows the role of physical activity in overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29:502–508. [PubMed]
33. Strath S, Swartz A, Parker S, Miller N, Cieslik L. Walking and metabolic syndrome in older adults. J Phys Act Health. 2007;4:397–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Swartz A, Strath S, Parker S, Miller N, Cieslik L. Ambulatory activity and body mass index in white and non-white older adults. J Phys Act Health. 2007;4:294–304. [PubMed]
35. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Parker SJ, Miller NE. The impact of body-mass index and steps per day on blood pressure and fasting glucose in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2008;16:188–200. [PubMed]
36. Kruger J, Ham SA, Prohaska TR. Behavioral risk factors associated with overweight and obesity among older adults: the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Yates T, Davies M, Brady E, et al. Walking and inflammatory markers in individuals screened for type 2 diabetes. Prev Med. 2008;47:417–421. [PubMed]
38. Drexel H, Saely CH, Langer P, et al. Metabolic and anti-inflammatory benefits of eccentric endurance exercise - a pilot study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008;38:218–226. [PubMed]
39. McCormack G, Giles-Corti B, Milligan R. Demographic and individual correlates of achieving 10,000 steps/day: use of pedometers in a population-based study. Health Promot J Austr. 2006;17:43–47. [PubMed]
40. Mora S, Lee I-M, Buring J, Ridker P. Association of physical activity and body mass index with novel and traditional cardiovascular biomarkers in women. JAMA. 2006;295:1412–1419. [PubMed]
41. Hammett CJ, Prapavessis H, Baldi JC, et al. Effects of exercise training on 5 inflammatory markers associated with cardiovascular risk. Am Heart J. 2006;151:367. [PubMed]
42. Larowe TL, Piper ME, Schlam TR, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Obesity and Smoking: Comparing Cessation Treatment Seekers With the General Smoking Population. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:1301–1305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Woolf K, Reese CE, Mason MP, Beaird LC, Tudor-Locke C, Vaughan LA. Physical activity is associated with risk factors for chronic disease across adult women's life cycle. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:948–959. [PubMed]
44. Thompson DL, Rakow J, Perdue SM. Relationship between accumulated walking and body composition in middle-aged women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:911–914. [PubMed]
45. Sugiura H, Sugiura H, Kajima K, Mirbod SM, Iwata H, Matsuoka T. Effects of long-term moderate exercise and increase in number of daily steps on serum lipids in women: randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2002;2:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Clemes SA, Parker RA. Increasing our understanding of reactivity to pedometers in adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:674–680. [PubMed]
47. Wyatt HR, Peters JC, Reed GW, Barry M, Hill JO. A Colorado statewide survey of walking and its relation to excessive weight. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2005;37:724–730. [PubMed]
48. Shephard R. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37:197–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed]