Although activation of JAK-STAT signaling constitutes an important component of host defense mechanisms, the status of this pathway during
Rickettsia infection of endothelial cells, the primary host cell niche preferably targeted by pathogenic rickettsiae during human spotted fever syndromes, has so far remained a neglected area of scientific enquiry. The findings of this study establish that the activation of STAT1 occurs during
R. conorii infection of microvascular endothelial cells, implicate an IFN-β-mediated autocrine mechanism in sustaining this cellular response, and yield first evidence suggesting the involvement of both STAT1 and IFN-β in the control of intracellular replication of
R. conorii. Widely accepted as an indicator of its activation, we observed phosphorylation of Tyr701 residue on both the full-length α isoform of STAT1 protein and the alternatively spliced, C-terminal truncated β isoform. Such a response was clearly evident in microvascular HMECs, included in our studies because of the tropism of pathogenic rickettsiae for the microvascular endothelium lining of small and medium-sized vessels during human disease and in experimental models of infection. In addition, infection of macrovascular HUVECs, a cell type used to establish
in vitro models of infection and widely used thereafter to define host cell interactions with pathogenic rickettsiae (
17,
36,
42), also displayed a similar pattern of STAT1 activation. Known to enhance the transcription of target genes (
18), phosphorylation of serine 727 in the transactivation domain of the STAT1 α isoform was also induced in
R. conorii-infected endothelial cells. Interestingly,
R. conorii not only induced Tyr/Ser phosphorylation of STAT1 but also increased the abundance of the STAT1 protein in endothelial cells. Increased levels of total STAT1 protein have previously been shown to occur in HeLa cells and mouse lung mononuclear cells infected with pathogenic
Chlamydia species (
19,
29). Recent studies have shown that unphosphorylated STAT1 is required to prolong the expression of IFN-induced immune regulatory genes (
2). Although the specific biological functions and the mechanisms underlying STAT1 accumulation in
Rickettsia-infected endothelial cells have yet to be defined in further detail, such an occurrence may be attributed to increased
de novo synthesis, delay in the processing for degradation, or possibly a combination of both of these mechanisms.
In agreement with published evidence documenting the production of endogenous IFN-α/β by cultured mouse fibroblasts in response to infection with
R. prowazekii (
44), the present study unequivocally demonstrates that
R. conorii infection stimulates the expression and secretion of IFN-β from endothelial cells. In this context, it is critically important to consider the intracellular behavior patterns of spotted fever group species (
R. conorii and
R. rickettsii) versus those of typhus group species (
R. prowazekii), which display significantly higher intracellular accumulation of
R. prowazekii due to the lack of actin-based motility seen in spotted fever rickettsiae. On the other hand, both of these major subgroups of pathogenic rickettsiae exhibit a tendency to preferentially infect vascular endothelium during human rickettsioses as well as in established animal models of infection. The outcomes of this study allow us to hypothesize that
R. conorii-mediated IFN-β expression likely occurs via a two-component mechanism. As the first step, the presence of intracellular rickettsiae is sensed by an as yet unknown host surveillance system leading to the initiation of an IFN-β expression/secretion response. Although the recognition mechanism(s) of the host cell capable of detecting the proteins secreted into the cytoplasmic environment or the presence of intact intracellular rickettsiae remains to be identified, several intracellular as well as extracellular receptor signaling pathways are known to induce IFN-β expression during microbial infections. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are capable of activating type I IFNs in response to microbial DNA and RNA. Specifically, TLR stimulation by specific microbial stimuli activates cellular transcription factors such as NF-κB, IRF3, and IRF7 via several adaptor proteins, culminating in the expression and release of proinflammatory mediators such as cytokines and type I IFNs. In addition, cytosolic receptors such as retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-1) and melanoma differentiation antigen 5 (MDA5) also detect double-stranded RNA from RNA viruses to induce type I IFNs (
49). Both IRF3 and IRF7 bind to the target response elements on the promoter regions of IFN-α and/or IFN-β to induce their transcription, and consequently, activation of IRF3, IRF7, or both is required for the IFN-α/β induction response (
11–
15). It has been shown that IFN-β induction in
Chlamydophila pneumoniae-infected HUVECs is dependent on IRF3 and IRF7 (
1). In a simultaneous follow-up step, secreted IFN-β induces its own expression through a positive-feedback loop. IFN-β is known to activate STAT1, STAT2, and IRF9 proteins to form the ISGF3 complex, which then binds to ISREs to induce IRF7 and IRF9. ISGF3-mediated IRF7 induction also contributes to a positive-feedback mechanism by upregulating IFN-α/β expression (
23,
33). Our data are consistent with the potential involvement of such a mechanism in
R. conorii-infected HMECs, which display increased expression of regulatory factors IRF7 and IRF9. Also, the presence of an IFN-β-neutralizing antibody inhibits IFN-β gene expression in
R. conorii-infected endothelial cells, further suggesting the existence and contributions of an IFN-β-mediated positive-feedback loop. Such a positive feedback apparently functions in an autocrine/paracrine manner to augment IFN-β production from infected cells, thereby alerting uninfected neighbor cells to the presence of infection. Known to be activated by viral or bacterial infections, IRF3 is also capable of inducing IFN-β expression, yet there was no evidence for Ser396 phosphorylation as an indicator of IRF3 activation during
R. conorii infection (data not shown). Although these data clearly implicate the presence of IRF3 in HMECs, the present study did not investigate its steady-state levels during the course of infection because unlike IRF7 and IRF9, IRF3 expression is not considered to be inducible by IFN-β (
3,
13,
15).
IFN-β-mediated protective host responses against intracellular Gram-negative bacterial infections, for example,
Chlamydia trachomatis infections, have previously been reported (
19). However, IFN-β production in
Listeria-infected lymphocytes functions to render the host more susceptible to infection (
27). Thus, IFN-β is capable of triggering both protective and detrimental effects, depending on the nature of the pathogen. Our data yield the first evidence to support the proposal that endothelial IFN-β activation has protective functions against intracellular
R. conorii replication. Whereas IFN-β neutralization results in increased
R. conorii replication, treatment with recombinant IFN-β had the opposite inhibitory effect, as expected. Secreted IFN-β may act on uninfected cells to activate IFN-inducible genes that make cells more resilient to invading pathogenic rickettsiae. It has been shown that cross talk between IFN-α/β and IFN-γ can trigger strong cellular responses to IFN-γ and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (
41). Interestingly, IFN-γ is capable of inhibiting rickettsial growth and has been documented to be critically important to clear the infection
in vivo (
6,
45,
47,
48). However, the significance of the potential cross talk between IFN-α/β and IFN-γ in rickettsiosis has not yet been evaluated either
in vitro or
in vivo.
STAT1 activation is required for both type I and type II IFN-mediated antimicrobial activity. STAT1-knockout mice are highly susceptible to bacterial infections, such as those caused by
Listeria monocytogenes and
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (
24,
39). Furthermore, cells and tissues of STAT1-deficient mice are unresponsive to IFNs and show compromised innate immunity against viral infections (
4). Intriguingly, interferons are also capable of inducing antiviral responses via STAT1-independent mechanisms (
10), yet the molecular events underlying such pathways are not well elucidated. Thus, taking into consideration that antiviral responses are induced by both STAT1-dependent and STAT1-independent pathways by interferons, we investigated whether STAT1 protein is required for IFN-β-mediated antirickettsial activity by STAT1 gene knockdown in endothelium. Our data not only demonstrate that IFN-β-mediated inhibition of
R. conorii replication requires STAT1 activation but also suggest that siRNA-mediated interference with STAT1 activity results in significantly enhanced replication of
R. conorii in the host cells. We anticipate that STAT1 activation likely induces transcription of antimicrobial compounds which resist intracellular bacterial growth and replication. Our quantitative RT-PCR-based array data show upregulation of ISG15, OAS1, and GBP1 proteins, all of which are known to possess antimicrobial activities. Although the antirickettsial mechanisms of these STAT1-inducible genes have not yet been characterized, their potential roles in
Rickettsia-infected endothelium warrant further detailed investigations of this critically important aspect of innate immunity.