Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 January 14.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3163161

Coordination of DNA Replication and Histone Modification by the Rik1-Dos2 Complex


Histone modification marks play an important role in many chromatin processes1,2. During DNA replication, both heterochromatin and euchromatin are disrupted ahead of the replication fork and then reassembled into their original epigenetic states behind the fork3,4. How the histone marks are faithfully inherited during each generation is still poorly understood. In fission yeast RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated histone methylation is cell-cycle regulated. Centromere repeats are transiently transcribed at S phase and processed into small interference RNAs (siRNAs) by RITS and RDRC complexes5-7. The small RNAs, in concert with silencing factors, including Dos1/Clr8, Dos2/Clr7, Rik1 and Lid2, promote heterochromatic H3K9 methylation by a histone methyltransferase, Clr48-13. H3K9 methylation serves as a binding site for Swi6, a structural and functional homolog of metazoan Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1)14. Here we characterize a silencing complex, which contains Dos2, Rik1, Mms19, and Cdc20 (DNA polymerase epsilon). The complex regulates RNA Pol II activity in heterochromatin, and is required for DNA replication and heterochromatin assembly. Our findings provide a molecular link between DNA replication and histone methylation, shedding light on how epigenetic marks are transmitted during each cell cycle.

To further explore the role of Dos2 in heterochromatin assembly, we sought to identify Dos2-associated proteins by tandem affinity purification (TAP). Mass spectrometry analysis of TAP-tag purified Dos2 revealed, in addition to Rik1, two new interacting members: Cdc20, the DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit15, and a previous uncharacterized protein (SPAC1071.02) (Fig. 1a). SPAC1071.02 is highly conserved (Supplementary Fig. 1). Its homolog in budding yeast is MMS19, thus we named it Mms1916. The interactions of Dos2 with Mms19 and Cdc20 were confirmed by Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) (Supplementary Fig. 2 and 3).

Figure 1
Cdc20 is essential for gene silencing and siRNA generation

Cdc20 is a conserved DNA polymerase epsilon subunit, sharing extensive homology with its counterparts in human and budding yeast. Cdc20 regulates the elongation of leading strand DNA replication shortly after initiation and is essential for viability15. To test whether Cdc20 is required for silencing, we used a temperature sensitive mutant allele, cdc20-p7. At 37 °C, mutant cells arrest in early S phase. We crossed the mutant into the otr::ura4+ background and performed a silencing assay. We found that, at the non-restrictive temperature, 34 °C, the mutant cells grew poorly on the control plate, compared to WT, likely resulting from the replication abnormality. However, on medium lacking uracil the mutants had more robust growth than WT, while on the 5′-FOA plate cells have little growth, demonstrating that centromere silencing was partially compromised (Fig. 1b). These results indicated that full heterochromatin silencing requires Cdc20.

In WT cells, heterochromatin transcripts are quickly processed by RNAi machinery, but in RNAi-processing defective mutants, such as dcr1Δ, these transcripts are readily detectable17. In cdc20-p7 mutant cells incubated at 34 °C, similar to dcr1Δ, peri-centromere transcripts clearly accumulated (Fig. 1c). We then examined the level of small RNAs in the mutant by Northern blot. Since RNAi is temperature-sensitive, small RNAs in WT are considerably reduced at 34 °C but still detectable6 (Fig. 1d). In the cdc20-p7 mutant, however, siRNAs are completely abolished (Fig. 1d), showing that Cdc20 promotes siRNA generation.

To further determine how heterochromatin structure is affected, we examined H3K9 methylation and Swi6 distribution in the cdc20-p7 cells grown at 34 °C. H3K9 methylation at the pericentromere was significantly reduced at the elevated temperature (Fig. 2a) and association of Swi6 also was decreased (Supplementary Fig. 4), consistent with the heterochromatin defect showed by the silencing assay. We also used delocalization of Swi6-GFP to assess loss of heterochromatin, as the GFP-Swi6 pattern is unchanged in RNAi mutants18. We found that 53% of cdc20-p7 cells at 34 °C and more than 70% at 37 °C had a diffuse GFP-Swi6 pattern, a defect similar to the dos2Δ mutant (Supplementary Fig. 5; Fig. 2b). WT cells incubated at the elevated temperatures did not show severe Swi6 delocalization (Fig. 2b) demonstrating that heterochromatin formation requires Cdc20. Since heterochromatin formation is mediated by both RNAi-dependent and –independent pathways19, the silencing abnormality in cdc20-p7 suggested that Cdc20 acts at an early stage of heterochromatin assembly.

Figure 2
Heterochromatin abnormality is coupled to the DNA replication defects

Mms19, another Dos2 interacting factor, is a conserved protein, containing the HEAT repeat domain (Supplementary Fig. 1). Studies of its homolog in budding yeast, MMS19, and in human reveal that they function as a TFIIH regulator, participating in the initiation of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) transcription16,20. Interestingly, human MMS19 is also required for chromosome segregation21. To study the role of Mms19 in fission yeast, we first examined its distribution using a GFP-tagged version of Mms19, and found that the GFP signal is predominantly nuclear, consistent with its potential role as a transcription regulator (Supplementary Fig. 6). To elucidate the Mms19 function, we created an mms19 null mutant. The mms19Δ mutant grew slower than the wild type strain (WT) but it was viable, indicating that Mms19+ is not an essential gene. Similar to the budding yeast mms19 mutant, the growth of mms19Δ requires methionine (Supplementary Fig. 7).

Since the Mms19 homolog in other organisms associates with the TFIIH complex, we speculated that Mms19 may be involved in RNA Pol II transcription in heterochromatin regions. To address this possibility, we directly examined centromeric transcription by RT-PCR. The transcripts are abundant in siRNA-processing mutants, such as dcr1Δ, but it is difficult to detect them in WT17 (Supplementary Fig. 8). The centromere transcripts were not discernible in the mms19Δ mutant by RT-PCR, similar to WT (Supplementary Fig. 8), and were greatly reduced in a dcr1Δ mms19Δ double mutant (Fig. 3a). We reasoned that, as a result of reduction of primary siRNA transcript, centromeric siRNA levels may also decrease. To test this, RNA extracted from the mms19Δ mutant was probed for centromeric siRNA by Northern blot which showed that siRNAs were partially reduced in mms19Δ(Fig. 3b). These data further demonstrated that Mms19 regulates centromere transcription.

Figure 3
Mms19 is required for heterochromatin RNA Pol II transcription

Coinciding with heterochromatin expression, RNA Pol II is preferentially restricted to heterochromatin at S phase5. To further elucidate the role of Mms19, we investigated how Mms19 associates with heterochromatin during the cell cycle. After release from synchronization, cells carrying Mms19-TAP at different stages were collected. We found that Mms19 preferentially associated with heterochromatin at S phase (Fig. 3c), in concurrence with the enrichment of RNA Pol II. We then investigated how Mms19 affects the RNA Pol II distribution in heterochromatin at this stage. ChIP with an RNA Pol II antibody showed that RNA Pol II accumulation at S phase was reduced considerably in the mms19Δ mutant (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, Mms19 physically associates with RNA Pol II (Supplementary Fig. 9). Together, our results suggest that Mms19 is a transcription activator, required for the heterochromatic RNA Pol II transcription.

To gain further insight into how the cdc20-p7 mutant affects its interaction with Dos2 and Mms19, we created a HA tagged version of the mutant gene. Co-IP showed that at 23 °C Cdc20-p7-HA maintains its association with Dos2 and Mms19; however, these interactions were lost at 34 °C, indicating that the point mutation reduced the interaction at elevated temperature (Fig. 4a). We also investigated the association of heterochromatin of Mms19 by ChIP in synchronized cdc20-p7 cells released from metaphase. At 23 °C the peak enrichment of Mms19 in the mutant at S phase, ~80 min after release, was obvious; however, the accumulation of Mms19 was not observed when temperature was elevated to 34 °C, indicating that Cdc20 is required for Mms19’s association with heterochromatin (Fig. 4b). A previous report showed that Dos2, and Rik1 start to accumulate in heterochromatin at S phase5. We then determined whether Cdc20 affects the recruitment of the two silencing factors. Using ChIP assays with antibodies for TAP or Myc tag, we found that at 23 °C Dos2-TAP and Rik1-myc are enriched at S phase, consistent with the previous study; however, the association is diminished at 34 °C (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 10). The results indicate that Cdc20 is required for recruitment of Dos2 and Rik1 to heterochromatin. Interestingly, heterochromatic silencing is also partially compromised in mutants in two different DNA polymerase alpha subunits22,23. As DNA polymerase alpha-primase is required before elongation by polymerase epsilon, it is possible that interaction of the Rik1 complex with Cdc20 underlies this silencing defect.

Figure 4
Functional interactions between components of Dos2 complex

We reasoned that the loss of silencing in the mutant may be linked to the impairment of DNA replication. In fact, cdc20-p7cells at 34 °C grew much more slowly than at 23 °C, and had an extended S phase (Fig. 1b). Efficiency of replication recovery from UV-induced damage demonstrates the replication state of the tested strain. We found that cdc20-p7 was highly sensitive to UV at 34 °C but not at 23 °C (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, heterochromatic fragments that contain ARS elements cannot replicate efficiently in the mutant at 34 °C (Supplementary Fig. 11). Thus, the loss of heterochromatin silencing in cdc20-p7 appears coupled to a defect in DNA replication.

To gain further insight into the role of Cdc20 in the heterochromatin pathway, we analyzed an N-terminal deletion of Cdc20, cdc20ΔN-term. The N-terminus of Cdc20, which contains the catalytic domain, is not essential for survival24. To test how the mutant affects heterochromatin silencing, cdc20ΔN-term in otr::ade6+ background was analyzed on rich medium supplemented with no extra adenine at room temperature. WT cells form red colonies due to transcriptional silencing, but cdc20ΔN-term colonies have a white color (Fig. 2d), indicating that heterochromatin silencing is alleviated in the mutant. Consistent with this, H3K9 methylation in peri-centromeric repeats is significantly reduced (Fig. 2e). Thus, DNA replication and heterochromatin function were decoupled in this mutant, further showing that Cdc20 is directly involved in heterochromatin silencing.

We demonstrate that the Dos2 complex, which contains Dos2, Mms19, Rik1 and Cdc20, is critical for DNA replication, siRNA production and heterochromatin assembly. Our findings establish the first physical and functional link between DNA replication, small RNA generation and H3K9 methylation, and provide a novel mechanism to explain how they are coordinated (Fig. 4d).

Our results provide insight into how the epigenetic states of heterochromatin are faithfully duplicated in each cell cycle (Fig. 4d). In budding yeast, heterochromatin assembly requires S phase progression but not origin firing25,26. Our findings suggest that DNA replication is required for heterochromatin assembly in S. pombe. In plants and mammals, DNA replication and DNA polymerase epsilon also have been implicated in silencing heterochromatin27-29. This suggests that a molecular mechanism linking DNA replication to heterochromatin formation, similar to the one elucidated in this study, is likely conserved in multicellular eukaryotes.


Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Cells synchronization was performed by hydroxyurea method. For mass spectrometry, TAP-tagged Dos2 was purified from a total of 9 × 1010 cells as described previously11. Fluorescent immunofluorescence images were taken by a Delta Vision System (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA). SoftWoRX2.50 (Applied Precision) was used for processing the final projections. For UV Survival Assay, exponential growing cells were collected, and plated with appropriate dilutions onto YES media. The plates were then irradiated by various UV doses. After incubation at 23 °C for 5 day, the colonies were counted. Detailed descriptions of Immunoprecipitation assays, ChIP, RT-PCR and Northern blot can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Material


We thank R. Allshire, P. Nurse, G. D’Urso, and Japan Yeast Genetic Resource Center for their strains, E. Osborne and C. Hale for comments on manuscript, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory for mass spectrometry analysis, members of the Cande and Li laboratories for their support and discussions. This work is supported by a grant from NIH RO1GM076396 to WZC and RAM.



Fission Yeast Strains, Media and Genetic Procedures

Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Yeast extract with supplements (YES) was used as a complete culture medium, EMM as a minimum media, and SPAS used for conjugation and sporulation. Cells synchronization was performed by hydroxyurea method. Briefly, cells were treated with 12mM hydroxyurea for 4 h, then released into 100 μg of TBZ/ml for 1 h to block mitotic entry. Standard genetic protocols for fission yeast were used30.

Mass Spectrometry

TAP-tagged Dos2 was purified from a total of 9 × 1010 cells as described previously31. Briefly, cell lycates in 1x lysis buffer (50 mM bis-Tris propane, pH 7.0, 0.1 M KCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol) were incubated with IgG sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for two hrs. After washing with lysis buffer, the IgG sepharose was incubated overnight with TEV protease (Invitrogen). Supernatant was removed from the IgG sepharose and added to S protein agarose slurry (Novagen) for 3 hrs. The S protein agarose was washed by lysis buffer. The elute from S protein agarose was analyzed by silver staining and subjected to mass spectrometry (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Immunoprecipitation Assays

Cells were lysed by glass bead method in HB buffer30. Lysates were pre-cleared with protein A agarose beads, followed by 2-hour incubation with anti-HA or GFP antibody (Sigma), or IgG Sepharose 6 Fastflow beads (Amersham Bioscience) at 4°C. After washing, eluted proteins and input extracts were analyzed by Western blotting using anti-S tag (ABR, MA1-981) or anti-PolII (ab5408, Abcam).

ChIP Analysis

CHIP assays were carried out as previously described32. Cells growing at log phase were crosslinked by 1% formaldehyde. Immunoprecipitation was performed with S protein agarose (Novagen) or the following antibodies: dimethylated H3-K9 (Upstate, 07-441) or Swi6 (Abcam, ab14898). Precipitated DNA was analyzed by competitive PCR using oligonucleotides specific to centromeric dh region or to the control gene, act1+. PCR products were separated on a 1.7% agarose gel and post-stained with ethidium bromide. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 2.


Total RNA was isolated from cells growing at log phase by RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). After treated with DNAase I (Promega), 50 ng of purified RNA was analyzed by RT-PCR in a 25 μl reaction volume using a one-step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen). Equal loading of RNA samples were assessed by amplification of the control gene, act1+. For strand-specific RT-PCR, RNA samples were incubated with primers complimentary to either forward or reverse centromeric transcripts for synthesis of the first cDNA strand. After heat inactivation of the reverse transcriptase at 95°C for 15 min, a second primer was added for the subsequent cycles of PCR amplification. Primers used for RT-PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Small RNA Northern Blot

Small RNA Northern blot was performed as described previously10. Briefly, siRNAs were extracted from exponentially growing cells in YES media using a mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Ambion). 25 μg of small total RNA was resolved by a 15% denaturing acrylamide gel, and blotted to a charged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+, Amersham). RNA blots were cross-linked and hybridized with DNA probes specific for centromere otr region or snoRNA69 as a loading control. DNA oligonucleotides used are listed in Supplementary Table 2.


Fluorescent images were taken by a Delta Vision System (Applied Precision, Issaquah, WA). SoftWoRX2.50 (Applied Precision) was used for processing the final projections. DAPI staining was followed the standard procedure.

UV Survival Assay

Exponential growing cells were collected, and plated with appropriate dilutions onto YES media. The plates were irradiated by various UV doses. After incubation at 23°C for 5 days, the colonies were counted.

DNA Replication Assay

A pBluescript plasmid carrying a 3.0-kb fragment from heterochromatic cen3 repeats (3.0-K) 33 and also an ura4+ selective marker was transformed into the cdc20-p7 mutant strain. The centromeric fragment contains efficient ARS elements33. After incubation at 23°C or 34°C for 4 days, total DNA was isolated following standard procedure33. 50 ng of purified DNA was analyzed by PCR (BioRad) using primers specific for ura4+. Equal loading were assessed by amplification of the control gene, act1+.

References for Supplementary Information

30. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:795–823. [PubMed]
31. Cheeseman IM, et al. Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function. J. Cell Biol. 2001;155:1137–1145. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Pidoux A, Mellone B, Allshire R. Analysis of chromatin in fission yeast. Methods. 2004;33:252. [PubMed]
33. Smith JG, et al. Replication of centromere II of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:5165–5172. [PMC free article] [PubMed]


Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at

Author Contributions F.L. and W.Z.C. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. F.L. performed the experiments. R.M. provided mass spectrometry expertise, equipment, and conceptual support.

Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at

The authors declare no competing financial interests.


1. Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. [PubMed]
2. Allis CD, J T, Reinberg D. Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2006.
3. Probst AV, Dunleavy E, Almouzni G. Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2009;10:192–206. [PubMed]
4. Wallace J, Orr-Weaver T. Replication of heterochromatin: insights into mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance. Chromosoma. 2005;114:389–402. [PubMed]
5. Chen ES, et al. Cell cycle control of centromeric repeat transcription and heterochromatin assembly. Nature. 2008;451:734–737. [PubMed]
6. Kloc A, Zaratiegui M, Nora E, Martienssen R. RNA interference guides histone modification during the S phase of chromosomal replication. Current Biology. 2008;18:490–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Motamedi MR, et al. Two RNAi complexes, RITS and RDRC, physically interact and localize to noncoding centromeric RNAs. Cell. 2004;119:789–802. [PubMed]
8. Hong EJ, Villen J, Gerace EL, Gygi SP, Moazed D. A cullin E3 ubiquitin ligase complex associates with Rik1 and the Clr4 histone H3-K9 methyltransferase and is required for RNAi-mediated heterochromatin formation. RNA Biol. 2005;2 [PubMed]
9. Horn PJ, Bastie JN, Peterson CL. A Rik1-associated, cullin-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for heterochromatin formation. Genes & Development. 2005;19:1705–1714. [PubMed]
10. Li F, et al. Two novel proteins, Dos1 and Dos2, interact with Rik1 to regulate heterochromatic RNA interference and histone modification. Current Biology. 2005;15:1448–1457. [PubMed]
11. Li F, et al. Lid2 Is Required for Coordinating H3K4 and H3K9 Methylation of Heterochromatin and Euchromatin. Cell. 2008;135:272–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Thon G, et al. The Clr7 and Clr8 directionality factors and the Pcu4 cullin mediate heterochromatin formation in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics. 2005;171:1583–1595. [PubMed]
13. White SA, Allshire RC. RNAi-mediated chromatin silencing in fission yeast. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 2008;320:157–183. [PubMed]
14. Bannister AJ, et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 2001;410:120–124. [PubMed]
15. Durso G, Nurse P. Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc20(+) encodes DNA polymerase epsilon and is required for chromosomal replication but not for the S phase checkpoint. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997;94:12491–12496. [PubMed]
16. Lauder S, et al. Dual requirement for the yeast MMS19 gene in DNA repair and RNA polymerase II transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 1996;16:6783–6793. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Volpe TA, et al. Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science. 2002;297:1833–1837. [PubMed]
18. Hall IM, Noma K, Grewal SIS. RNA interference machinery regulates chromosome dynamics during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:193–198. [PubMed]
19. Jia ST, Noma K, Grewal SIS. RNAi-independent heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated ATF/CREB family proteins. Science. 2004;304:1971–1976. [PubMed]
20. Wu XY, Li H, Chen JD. The human homologue of the yeast DNA repair and TFIIH regulator MMS19 is an AF-1-specific coactivator of estrogen receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276:23962–23968. [PubMed]
21. Ito S, et al. MMXD, a TFIIH-independent XPD-MMS19 protein complex involved in chromosome segregation. Mol Cell. 2010;39:632–640. [PubMed]
22. Natsume T, et al. A DNA Polymerase alpha Accessory Protein, Mcl1, Is Required for Propagation of Centromere Structures in Fission Yeast. Plos One. 2008;3:14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Nakayama J, Allshire RC, Klar AJS, Grewal SIS. Role for DNA polymerase alpha in epigenetic control of transcriptional silencing in fission yeast. EMBO Journal. 2001;20:2857–2866. [PubMed]
24. Feng WY, D’Urso G. Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells lacking the amino-terminal catalytic domains of DNA polymerase epsilon are viable but require the DNA damage checkpoint control. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2001;21:4495–4504. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Kirchmaier AL, Rine J. DNA replication-independent silencing in S-cerevisiae. Science. 2001;291:646–650. [PubMed]
26. Li YC, Cheng TH, Gartenberg MR. Establishment of transcriptional silencing in the absence of DNA replication. Science. 2001;291:650–653. [PubMed]
27. Finnegan EJ, Dennis ES. Vernal ization-induced trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 at FLC is not maintainedin mitotically quiescent cells. Current Biology. 2007;17:1978–1983. [PubMed]
28. Yin H, et al. Epigenetic regulation, somatic homologous recombination, and abscisic acid signaling are influenced by DNA polymerase mutation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:386–402. [PubMed]
29. Fuss J, Linn S. Human DNA polymerase epsilon colocalizes with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and DNA replication late, but not early, in S phase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:8658–8666. [PubMed]