PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of ijayurvedaHomeCurrent issueInstructionsSubmit article
 
Int J Ayurveda Res. 2011 Jan-Mar; 2(1): 37–41.
PMCID: PMC3157107
Pharmacognostical evaluation of Barringtonia acutangula leaf
Dharamaraj Padmavathi, Lakshmi Susheela, and Rajkishore Vijaya Bharathi
Department of Pharmacognosy, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Vijaya Bharathi Rajkishore, Department of Pharmacognosy, Madras Medical College, Chennai – 600 003, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: rvbharathi2003/at/yahoo.com
Received April 30, 2010; Accepted April 30, 2011.
Barringtonia acutangula (L.) Gaertn. (Family: Lecythidaceae) is an evergreen tree with simple, alternate leaves, long pendulous racemes, dark scarlet flowers, and ellipsoid to ovoid berries containing one ovoid black seed. The present study deals with a detailed pharmacognostical study on the leaf of the crude drug, B. acutangula. Morphoanatomy of the leaf was studied using light and confocal microscopy and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on quality control methods for medicinal plant materials. Literature reveals that the phytoconstituents like tanginol, barrinic acid, and barringenic acid are present in the wood and fruits of this plant. Our preliminary phytochemical studies of the powdered leaves revealed the presence of terpenes, flavanoids, carbohydrates, tannins, steroids, and glycosides. The physico-chemical, morphological, histological parameters, and High Performance-Thin Layer Chromatographic (HPTLC) profile presented in this paper may be proposed as parameters to establish the authenticity of B. acutangula and can possibly help to differentiate the drug from its other species and the pharmacognostic profile of the leaves presented here will assist in standardization viz., quality, purity, and sample identification.
Keywords: Barringtonia acutangula, high performance thin layer chromatographic profile, pharmacognosy
Barringtonia acutangula (L.) Gaertn. (Family: Lecythidaceae) known as Dhatriphal in Sanskrit, is a medium-sized tree found throughout India, plentifully in the plains of Bengal.[1] B. asiatica and B. racemosa are the other species of Barringtonia. B. asiatica is a native of mangrove habitats on the tropical coasts and islands of the Indian Ocean and used to treat cysts, goiter, tumor, boils, stomach ache, and rheumatism. B. racemosa is found in coastal swamp forests and on the edges of estuaries in the Indian Ocean and its fruits are prescribed in the Ayurvedic literature for the treatment of pain, inflammation, and rheumatic conditions. B. acutangula is an evergreen tree with simple, alternate leaves, pendulous racemes, up to 40 cm long and 1.5 cm across, dark scarlet flowers with 4 lobed ovate calyx and 2 celled ovary. It has ellipsoid to ovoid berries, fibrous, truncate at both ends, crowned by small persistent calyx and each berry bears one ovoid black seed.[2] In Ayurveda, different formulations like Nichuladi lepa, Apachihara lepa, Lakshmivilasa rasa, Taptaraja taila are used for the treatment of various diseases such as jaundice, diseases of head, hemiplegia, joint pain, eye diseases, stomach disorders, diarrhea, cough, dyspnoea, leprosy, spleenic disorders, and poisoning.[35] According to Ayurveda, the properties (guna) of B. acutangula are ruksha (dry), laghu (light), and tikshna (sharp). It has a rasa (taste) of katu (pungent), tikta (bitter), sheeta (cold), and- virya (potency). Despite the numerous medicinal uses attributed to this plant, there are no pharmacognostical reports on the leaf of this plant. Hence, the present investigation deals with the morphological and anatomical evaluation, determination of physicochemical constants, preliminary phytochemical screening, and HPTLC profile of the different extracts. The profile presented in this paper may be proposed as parameters to establish the authenticity of B. acutangula and can possibly help to differentiate the drug from its other species.
Plant material
The leaves of B. acutangula were collected from Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, in the month of June 2008. After authentication by a taxonomist, a voucher specimen number, MMC/2008/07, has been deposited in the museum of the Department of Pharmacognosy, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Instruments and chemicals
Compound microscope, stage micrometer, camera lucida, drawing sheets, glass slides, cover slips, watch glass and other common glassware were the basic apparatus and instruments used for the study. Microphotographs were taken using a Leica (Dissecting Microscope Lighting System-DMLS) microscope attached with Leitz (Magnification Power System- MPS) 32 camera. Solvents viz., 95% Ethanol (EtOH), Petroleum ether (PE), Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and reagents such as phloroglucinol, glycerin, hydrochloric acid, chloral hydrate, and sodium hydroxide were procured from Ranbaxy Fine Chemicals Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Macroscopic and microscopic analysis
The macroscopy and microscopy of the leaves were studied according to the method of Brain and Turner.[6] For the microscopic studies, cross sections were prepared and stained as per the procedure of Johansen.[7] The micropowder analysis was done according to the method of Brain and Turner[8] and Kokate.[9]
Leaf constants
Leaf constants such as vein islet number, veinlet termination number, palisade ratio, and stomatal index were studied according to the method of Evans.[10]
Physicochemical analysis
Physicochemical analysis such as the percentage of ash values and extractive values were carried out according to the official methods prescribed in Indian Pharmacopoeia[11] and the WHO guidelines on quality control methods for medicinal plant materials[12] Fluorescence analysis was carried out by the method of Chase and Pratt[13] and Kokoski.[14]
Preliminary phytochemical screening
Preliminary screening was carried out by using standard procedures described by Kokate[9] and Harborne.[15]
HPTLC profile
Qualitative densitometric HPTLC analysis was performed for the development of characteristic finger print profile for PE, EtOAc, and EtOH extracts of leaves of B. acutangula. 10 μl of the sample solutions were applied and the plates were developed in PE and EtOAc (8:2) for PE extract, toluene and acetonitrile (3:1) for EtOAc and EtOH extracts. Developed plates were then scanned densitometrically at various wavelengths. Retention factor (Rf) values, peak area, peak height, and spectrum of each peak were determined for these extracts.
Macroscopic characters
The leaves are simple, alternate, 7-14.5 cm in length and 4-8 cm in breadth, obovate to oblong, acute apex, decurrent base, minutely denticulate to crenate margin, reticulate venation with smooth, dark green upper surface and rough, faint green lower surface.
Microscopic characters
Leaf
The transverse section of the leaf of B. acutangula shows a dorsiventral nature [Figure 1]. The section is broadly divided into lamina and midrib region. The lamina of the leaf shows three distinct regions viz., adaxial epidermis, abaxial epidermis, and mesophyll [Figure 1a]. The adaxial epidermis is single layered with squarish cells covered by a distinct cuticle. The abaxial epidermis is also single layered with rectangular cells having prominent peg like outgrowths. The mesophyll is differentiated into palisade and spongy parenchyma. The palisade parenchyma has two layers of narrow, cylindrical, and compact cells. The spongy parenchyma consists of about 12 layers of small, lobed, loosely arranged cells with wide air-chambers.
Figure 1
Figure 1
T. S of leaf (a) T.S. of lamina, (b) T.S. of midrib, (c) T.S. of petiole, (d) Crystal distribution (AdE- Adaxial epidermis, AbE- Abaxial epidermis, PM- Palisade mesophyll, SM- Spongy mesophyll, CPCuticular papillae, LV- Lateral vein, AdH- Adaxial hump, (more ...)
The lateral veins have prominent vascular strands, but do not project on to the leaf surface. The lateral vein has a small group of xylem elements and few phloem elements. The vascular strand is en-sheathed by thick sclerenchymatous tissue which extends into adaxial and abaxial pillars. The leaf margin is thick and semicircular and has fairly prominent circular vascular strands. The epidermal layer shows anomocytic type of stomata.
The midrib has prominent adaxial hump and wide semicircular abaxial part [Figure 1b]. The epidermal layer of the midrib is thin, comprising of small, thick walled squarish cells with outer papillate walls. The ground tissue is parenchymatous and homocellular. A wide mass of thick walled cells are located in the center of the adaxial hump. The vascular system of the midrib is complex. The vascular bundles are of three types; main bundle-xylem elements are thick walled, circular and it occurs in parallel radial rows with small sclerenchyma cells in between the rows and phloem occurs in thin sheath around the xylem, two circular lateral bundles and a row of six small circular vascular strands. The type of calcium oxalate crystals are druses and found in the vascular strands, veins of leaf, ground tissue of midrib and petiole as well as in phloem parenchyma [Figure 1d].
Petiole
Cross section of the petiole is circular with slightly flat adaxial side [Figure 1c]. It has a thin epidermal layer consisting of narrowly rectangular thick walled cells and some of them have peg like outgrowths on the tangential walls. The ground tissue consists of thick walled, angular, compact parenchymatous cells. The vascular system is complex, multi-stranded consisting of larger deeply curved main vascular bundle, two circular lateral bundles and eleven small vascular strands arranged in arcs. The main vascular bundle consists of several parallel rows of vessel multiples alternating with narrow intervening sclerenchyma cells. Phloem occurs in thick band all along the outer part of the xylem arc.
Powder characteristics
The organoleptic evaluation of the leaf powder revealed the following characteristics. The leaf powder is pale green in color, with a characteristic odor and bitter taste. On microscopic examination, the powder showed epidermal trichomes which are sparse [Figures [Figures2a2a and and2b].2b]. Starch grains are present in minute quantities and are spherical, concentric, and three lobed [Figure 2c]. Fibers of the petiole are wider and straight measuring 660-750 μm long and 20-25 μm wide [Figure 2d]. The trichomes are multicellular, uniseriate, and unbranched. The epidermal cells are small, polygonal thick walled, and straight. Fibers of the lamina are usually bent, narrow measuring 550- 650 μm long and 15-20 μm wide [Figure 2e].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Powder microscopy (a) Trichomes, (b) Epidermal fragments, (c) Starch grains, (d) Fibers of petiole, (e) Fibers of lamina
Leaf constants
The leaf constants viz., vein islet number, veinlet termination number, palisade ratio, and stomatal index are presented in Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1
Leaf constants of B. acutangula
Physicochemical constants
Ash values of a drug gave an idea of the earthy matter or the inorganic composition and other impurities present along with the drug. The ash values [Table 2] of the leaf powder of B. acutangula revealed a high concentration of sulphated ash. The extractive values are primarily useful for the determination of exhausted or adulterated drug. The ethanol soluble extractive was high for B. acutangula. The results of fluorescence analysis of leaf powder are presented in the Table 3.
Table 2
Table 2
Physicochemical constants of leaf powder of B. acutangula
Table 3
Table 3
Preliminary phytochemical screening of leaf powder of B. acutangula
Preliminary phytochemical screening
Preliminary phytochemical screening mainly revealed the presence of carbohydrates, phytosterols, terpenoids, flavonoids, glycosides, tannins, and saponins [Table 4].
Table 4
Table 4
Fluorescence analysis of leaf powder of B. acutangula
HPTLC profile
A densitometric HPTLC analysis was performed for the development of characteristic finger print profile for PE, EtOAc, and EtOH extracts of the leaf powder of B. acutangula [Figure 3], which may be used as markers for quality evaluation and standardization of the drug. Most of the compounds have shown maximum absorbance at 260 nm for PE extract, 366 nm for EtOAc extract, and 550 nm for EtOH extract. Two different mobile phases were selected to carry out the HPTLC profile for three different extracts viz., PE, EtOAc, and EtOH. All the three extracts did not show good separation in the same (single) mobile phase, because, different chemical constituents are present in different extracts. EtOAC and EtOH extracts generally contain moderately polar/polar compounds, while PE extract contains only non-polar compounds. Hence, depending on the polarity of compounds present in the extracts, two different mobile phases i.e., PE and EtOAc (8:2) for PE extract, toluene and acetonitrile (3:1) for EtOAc and EtOH extracts were used. The bands in the sample were obtained at Rf, 0.05, 0.08, 0.12, 0.17, 0.21, 0.29, 0.39, 0.54, 0.63, 0.72 [PE extract] and 0.06, 0.09, 0.20, 0.36, 0.40, 0.46, 0.57, 0.63, 0.68, 0.72, 0.79, 0.82 [EtOAC extract] and 0.13, 0.17, 0.24, 0.28, 0.44, 0.56, 0.65, 0.72, 0.80, 0.86 [EtOH extract], which can be used as identifying markers. The above Rf values and number of spots are invariable for the various extracts (PE, EtOAC, and EtOH) at particular solvent system studied. Change in Rf values and number of spots is an indicative marker of adulteration with this extract. Hence, the HPTLC finger print profile can be used as a marker for identification of adulteration in B. acutangula.
Figure 3
Figure 3
HPTLC chromatogram of PE, EtOAc, and EtOH extracts of B. acutangula leaf, (PE- Petroleum ether extract, EtOAc- Ethyl acetate extract, EtOH- Ethanol extract)
The microscopic characters, leaf constants, quantitative analysis, and physico-chemical constants studied here can be used for judging the adulteration and purity of this drug. Since these parameters studied are constant and any change in these values are indicative of substitution and adulteration with the plant, B. acutangula.
As there is no pharmacognostic anatomical work on record for this much valued traditional drug, the present work was taken up with a view to lay down standards which could be useful to detect the authenticity of this medicinally useful plant. Macro and micro morphological standards and HPTLC profile discussed here can be considered as identifying parameters to substantiate and authenticate the drug. In Ayurveda, its preparations include powder and pastes, used in vitiated conditions of kapha and pitta, leprosy, dysmenorrhea, plumbago, skin diseases, diarrhea, inflammation, flatulence, hemorrhoids, and as an anthelmintic. The preliminary phytochemical screening revealed the presence of terpenoids, flavonoids, glycosides, tannins, and saponins. These constituents may be possibly responsible for the above said activity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Madras Medical College, Chennai for providing the facilities to carry out the study.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
1. Nadkarni KM. Indian Materia Medica. Vol. 1. Mumbai, India: Popular Prakashan Ltd; 1954. pp. 176–7.
2. Nair NC, Henry HN. Flora of Tamilnadu. Botanical Survey of India. 1983;1:158.
3. Yoganarashimhan Medicinal Plants of India – Tamil Nadu. Vol. 2. Bangalore: Cyber Media; 2000. p. 71.
4. Satapathy KB, Brahmam M. Fourth International Congress Ethnobiology. Lucknow: NBRO; 1994. Ethnobotanical survey on tribal area plant Barringtonia acutangula.
5. A – Ci. Vol. 1. New Delhi: National Institute of Science Communication and Information resources: CSIR; 1997. The Wealth of India, A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products, 1st Supplemental Series (Raw Material) pp. 118–21.
6. Brain KR, Turner TD. The Practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals. Bristol: Wright-Scientechnica; 1975. pp. 4–9.
7. Johansen DA. Plant Microtechnique. NewYork: Mc Graw Hill Book Co; 1940. pp. 182–5.
8. Brain KR, Turner TD. The Practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals. Bristol: Wright-Scientechnica; 1975. pp. 36–45.
9. Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy. 1st ed. New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 1986. pp. 111–20.
10. Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. 15th edn. London: Saunders; 2003. pp. 545–547.
11. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare. 4th ed. Vol. 2. New Delhi: Controller of Publications; 1996. Indian Pharmacopoeia; pp. A53–4.
12. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials. Geneva: Organisation Mondiale De La Sante; 1992. WHO/PHARM/92.559/rev.1; pp. 9–34.
13. Chase CR, Pratt RS. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. J Am Pharmcol Assoc. 1949;38:32–5. [PubMed]
14. Kokoshi J, Kokoshi R, Sharma FJ. Fluorescence of Powdered vegetable drug under ultraviolet radiation. J Am Pharmcol Assoc. 1958;47:715–7. [PubMed]
15. Harborne JB. In: Phytochemical Methods. London: Chapman and Hall; 1998. Methods of Extraction and isolation; pp. 60–6.
Articles from International Journal of Ayurveda Research are provided here courtesy of
Medknow Publications