Malaria continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is responsible for 200,000 to 300,000 diagnosed cases and 600,000 to 900,000 deaths in 2009 alone (
40). Early detection and accurate diagnosis are the best tools for saving lives in regions of endemicity. Correct species identification and accurate diagnosis of mixed infections are of particular importance for proper treatment in regions where multiple parasite species are endemic. Of the five species within the genus
Plasmodium known to infect humans,
Plasmodium falciparum is the most deadly, followed by
Plasmodium vivax, which also causes significant morbidity and some mortality (
2,
10,
14,
23,
29,
38).
P. falciparum and
P. vivax also have wider global distributions than other species. The remaining three species (which are not the subject of this paper),
P. malariae,
P. ovale, and
P. knowlesi, have different global distributions (with
P. malariae being found primarily in South America and Asia and
P. ovale and
P. knowlesi being found primarily in Asia) and different levels of morbidity and mortality.
Light microscopy remains the gold standard of malaria diagnosis in regions of endemicity. While microscopy is cost-effective and requires little equipment, a well-trained microscopist is essential. A highly trained and experienced microscopist can typically detect parasitemias of as low as 90 to 200 parasites/μl. Misdiagnosis may still occur due to low parasitemia or mixed infection. Immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are increasingly being implemented in case management and control programs. RDTs identify the parasite antigens HRP2, pLDH, and pAldolase and may be pan-specific (for all
Plasmodium species),
P. falciparum specific, or both, depending on the test. RDTs are not effective for the full diagnosis of mixed infections, as they can only distinguish
P. falciparum and indicate the presence or absence of another
Plasmodium species. While they can detect parasitemia at levels as low as 100 parasites/μl, they are not quantitative (
21). Additionally, the HRP2 antigen can persist in blood after parasite clearance, leading to false-positive diagnoses. It has also been reported that up to 40% of
P. falciparum parasites in some parts of South America have
HRP-2 gene deletions, increasing concerns about false-negative diagnoses (
8).
The use of molecular diagnostic tools is the most accurate and sensitive method for detecting malaria parasite species. Their current use, however, is restricted to reference laboratories or research studies, since there are limitations associated with the use of molecular tools in regions of endemicity for routine diagnostic use (including infrastructure problems, prohibitive costs, a refrigerated or frozen supply cold chain, and the requirement for trained personnel). Despite these limitations, molecular methods are the best methods for detecting multiple species and subclinical infections (
4,
7), making them invaluable for malaria parasite detection. Molecular methods will become increasingly important given the proposed eradication/elimination goals and the need to detect subclinical infections (
12).
PCR-based amplification methods, including multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, and, more recently, the loop-mediated DNA amplification method (LAMP), have been developed to detect malaria parasite species (
11,
24,
25,
30,
31,
35,
37). Molecular methods offer the advantage of highly specific differentiation of
Plasmodium species. Recently, molecular techniques confirmed the natural infection of humans with the zoonotic
P. knowlesi in Southeast Asia (
33). This simian malaria parasite species had not previously been found in humans in great numbers, and a similar morphology resulted in an incorrect
P. malariae diagnosis by microscopy.
The most widely used molecular target for the detection of
Plasmodium and diagnosis of malaria was developed prior to the completion of any
Plasmodium genome sequence. The target is the 18S rRNA gene(s) (
11,
16,
30,
32,
34). This target was a logical choice given its high sequence conservation, the availability of universal primer sequences for its amplification, and the fact that it was known to exist in multiple copies in all organisms that had been examined at the time. The availability of complete
Plasmodium genome sequences presents a great opportunity for improving the existing molecular diagnostic tools by identifying new targets for more sensitive and specific detection. The
P. falciparum genome was completed in 2002 (
9), and
P. vivax and
P. knowlesi have since been sequenced (
5,
26). Despite the existence of genomic information for three of the five human-infecting malaria parasites for many years, the majority of molecular diagnostic tools still rely on 18S rRNA. Subsequent examination of
Plasmodium genome sequences has revealed that the 18S rRNA target is present in only 4 to 8 divergent, nontandem copies, depending upon the species, in contrast to the case for other eukaryotic genomes that have hundreds of tandem copies of rRNA gene clusters (
18,
19). In addition, the few 18S rRNA sequences that are present are not identical in sequence and are variably expressed during the parasite life cycle (
15). As PCR sensitivity is greatly influenced by the starting target molecule copy number, a low target copy number limits the detection capabilities of these assays, especially if the parasitemia is low.
The 18S rRNA gene target also presents challenges for effective multiplex platforms. The design of multiple primers to the same target can result in primer competition and decrease the efficiency of the assay. While multiplex assays for simultaneous detection of malaria parasite species do exist (
25,
31,
37), they show decreased sensitivity, particularly in detecting the minor species (
20). Rubio et al. (
31) designed a seminested two-tube multiplex PCR, with an initial genus-specific amplification followed by a secondary amplification using a universal
Plasmodium primer and species-specific reverse primers. Padley et al. (
25) designed a one-tube multiplex assay, using species-specific primers. However, both of these methods have been shown to perform less effectively than the standard nested PCR method (
20). Taylor et al. (
37) designed a multiplex real-time platform, relying on the increased sensitivity of both novel targets and fluorescent probes. However, this assay was most effective in duplex format and not as a true four-species multiplex assay.
To address the limitations of existing molecular diagnostic tools, we have mined Plasmodium genome sequence data and identified new target DNA sequences for improved molecular diagnostic applications. Here we detail the method used to identify these targets in P. falciparum and P. vivax, and we show that they provide increased sensitivity in a single-step PCR and increased efficacy in multiplex assays.