PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of fpdMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlerts
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
 
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009 May; 6(4): 461–470.
PMCID: PMC3145163

Modeling On-Farm Escherichia coli O157:H7 Population Dynamics

Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a potentially fatal foodborne pathogen with a putative reservoir for human infection in feedlot cattle. In order to more effectively identify targets for intervention strategies, we aimed to (1) assess the role of various feedlot habitats in E. coli O157:H7 propagation and (2) provide a framework for examining the relative contributions of animals and the surrounding environment to observed pathogen dynamics. To meet these goals we developed a mathematical model based on an ecological metapopulation framework to track bacterial population dynamics inside and outside the host. We used E. coli O157:H7 microbiological and epidemiological literature to characterize E. coli O157:H7 habitats at the pen level and account for E. coli O157:H7 population processes in water troughs, feedbunks, cattle hosts, and pen floors in the model. Simulations indicated that E. coli O157:H7 was capable of maintaining viable populations in the feedlot without net growth in the cattle gastrointestinal tract, suggesting E. coli O157:H7 may not always act as an obligate parasite. Water troughs and contaminated pen floors appeared to be particularly influential sources driving E. coli O157:H7 population dynamics and thus would serve as prime environmental targets for interventions to effectively reduce the E. coli O157:H7 load at the pen level.

Introduction

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli is a serious and potentially fatal pathogen of humans across the globe. E. coli O157:H7 infection can result in hemolytic uremic syndrome and accounts for thousands of cases of severe foodborne illness in the United States each year (Mead et al., 1999). E. coli O157:H7 can infect humans from a wide variety of sources; however, the most common source of exposure and subsequent infection is contaminated food. Poorly cooked, tainted ground beef and other bovine food products have often been implicated as the primary source of infection in outbreaks (e.g., Chapman et al., 1992; Morgan et al., 1993; Tarr 1995; Armstrong et al., 1996). Cattle are frequently test-positive and actively shed E. coli O157:H7 intermittently after challenge infection but rarely show clinical signs of disease (Besser et al., 1997; Hancock et al., 1997; Shere et al., 1998; Khaitsa et al., 2003). Cattle are putatively considered the primary reservoir for E. coli O157:H7 infecting humans (as reviewed by Hussein and Sakuma, 2005). It has been shown that a reduction in E. coli O157:H7 shedding in feedlot cattle is correlated with a reduction in carcass contamination at slaughter, indicating that preharvest interventions may be an effective means of controlling human foodborne infection (Chapman et al., 1992; Elder et al., 2000).

A number of interventions have been proposed to reduce E. coli O157:H7 load or prevalence in cattle that follow one of two general strategies: to reduce cattle's exposure to E. coli O157:H7 or to increase the resistance of cattle to the bacteria (Sargeant et al., 2007). Despite extensive testing including randomized clinical trials, no single intervention appears ready for extensive implementation that would result in the control of O157:H7 in bovine populations (Callaway et al., 2004; Ahmadi et al., 2007; LeJeune and Wetzel 2007). This suggests further work is needed to identify intervention measures that are both efficacious in reducing the load of E. coli O157:H7 at harvest and economically and logistically feasible to administer to large cattle holdings. However, it is not always clear if the failures of previous control strategies stem from an inefficient mechanism of action in the intervention when applied at the population level or are the result of inadequately targeting the vulnerable habitats of E. coli on the farm and feedlot. Currently, this question is difficult to answer as the relative importance of factors leading to propagation and maintenance of E. coli O157:H7 on the farm are poorly understood.

Fecal–oral contamination is presumed to be an important mechanism for transmission of E. coli O157:H7 between cattle in close proximity. The potential for direct transmission between cattle has been demonstrated in proof of concept studies; however, given the relatively high load and potential for reproduction of E. coli O157:H7 in water troughs (LeJeune et al., 2001a, 2001b; Van Donkersgoed et al., 2001), feed bunks (Lynn et al., 1998), slurry (Maule, 2000), feces (Wang et al., 1996; Fukushima et al., 1999), pen floors (Berry and Miller, 2005), and surrounding environment (Trevena et al., 1996; Beuchat, 1999; Taormina and Beuchat, 1999; Maule, 2000) and the high level of contact between these habitats and feedlot cattle, it seems unlikely that cow-to-cow transmission accounts for the majority of E. coli O157:H7 propagation and maintenance. Further support is found in the work of LeJeune et al. (2004), who reported that restriction endonuclease digestion patterns observed in E. coli O157:H7 remained consistent within feedlot from year to year despite massive cattle turnover, which the authors concluded implicated the farm environment, rather than incoming cattle, as a source for E. coli O157:H7.

Mathematical models have generally provided a framework in which the effect of interventions is able to be tested under a wide range of management conditions, thus allowing researchers to identify areas and processes vulnerable to disruption and offering specific management guidance. Previous mathematical modeling work has attempted to parse the contribution of environmental contamination and direct and indirect cattle to cattle transmission to observed E. coli O157:H7 dynamics (Turner et al., 2003, 2006, 2008; Liu et al., 2005, 2007; Ahmadi et al., 2007; Wood et al., 2007). However, the role of environment in on-farm E. coli O157:H7 propagation remains unclear.

We aim to address two central objectives through this study. Firstly, we examine the importance of various E. coli habitats (water troughs, feed bunks, cattle gastrointestinal tracts, and surrounding pen environment) to the propagation of the E. coli O157:H7 strain within the context of an ecologically realistic cattle feedlot. Secondly, we aim to identify vulnerable points for control of E. coli O157:H7 propagation and maintenance in cattle and the surrounding pen environment through various interventions in the absence of an explicitly modeled contact-based pathogen transmission process. To robustly examine these questions, we depart from the infectious disease compartmental framework (i.e., Suspectible Infected Susceptible models) used in previous studies and develop pathogen-level metapopulation models capable of reflecting widespread bacterial growth and population dynamics outside an animal host. This will allow us to focus current and future efforts to develop intervention strategies aimed at lowering the load of E. coli O157:H7 presented to the human food chain.

Methods

Model description

To meet these aims we follow methods based in an ecological metapopulation framework (Hanski, 1998) modified to represent a free-living pathogen capable of extra-host replication. The metapopulation framework allows for the study of populations consisting of organisms capable of moving between and growing in spatially segregated habitats. Briefly, a system of coupled ordinary differential equations is parameterized to represent potential replication habitats (i.e., patches) and population dynamics for E. coli O157:H7 while allowing for transfer between patches.

The dynamic equations in this model system represent E. coli O157:H7 organisms migrating between water troughs (W), feedbunks (F), cattle (C), and surrounding pen environment (E) compartments (Fig. 1). Habitats were selected based on reported potential for sustaining E. coli O157:H7 growth. Population dynamics are heterogenous between patches, reflecting diverse abilities at supporting E. coli O157:H7 replication:

equation M1
FIG. 1.
Diagrammatic representation of model states and flows. Boxes represent patches where E. coli O157:H7 can reside. Arrows represent migration rates between patches with flow from patch i to patch j represented by mij. Large arrows indicate density-dependent ...

Bacteria are tracked and parameters calibrated to colony-forming units (CFU) as these are the most common quantified measures of bacterial presence reported in the E. coli O157:H7 literature. Parameters are defined and estimates presented in Table 1. Point estimates and distributions were derived from literature when possible. Distributions were selected to encompass both expected natural variation and uncertainty in point estimates. The parameter μj represents non–density-dependent death (population-level decay) in compartment j. Growth rates (rj) in water troughs, feedbunks, animals, and surrounding environment are assumed to experience density-dependent adjustment through the logistic function dependent on the patch's carrying capacity (Kj). Growth rate in cattle (rc) was set to 1 in the base model indicating neutral net growth. This parameter was however allowed to vary above 1 in the sensitivity analysis of the deterministic and stochastic models to assess the importance of pathogen replication in the host assuming long-term colonization and growth. The terms mji represent the rate of movement between habitat j to habitat i and p is the passage rate of ingested media through the cattle gastrointestinal tract. All elements outside the logistic functions in the model are linear with assumed exponential time to events.

Table 1.
Parameter Definitions and Values for Deterministic and Stochastic Analysis

Cattle ingest bacteria from and shed fecal matter into all other states. The model developed here to test the role replication plays in each compartment does not mechanistically model contact-based transmission between cattle. Patches were selected based on their abilities to sustain and/or propagate E. coli O157:H7, and cattle are considered a single patch experiencing homogenous growth. Spilled water is modeled as a vector for CFU to move into the environment, and bacteria are reciprocally able to enter water from the environment as troughs are assumed to be contaminated throughout the daily activities of the cattle. A single pen is considered.

All patches are subject to assumptions of homogenous mixing within the compartment. For example, water troughs and feedbunks are assumed to have uniformly distributed CFU throughout the water column and feed mixture, respectively, and all steers are assumed to eat and drink at equal rates evenly across a day. All patches also maintain a constant capacity reflecting an assumption that portions of the “habitat” consumed or removed are continuously refilled. Water sources, feedbunks, and surrounding environment (e.g., pen floor) are assumed to be the only sources from which cattle are exposed to E. coli O157:H7. The bulk of feces are assumed to enter the surrounding environment, thus fecal–oral contamination is largely modeled as vectored through this compartment.

The model was implemented and solved numerically in both Vensim Professional (Ventana Systems, Inc., Harvard, MA) and R 2.4.1 (freely available online at www.r-project.org) across a single summer season (120 days). Model output from both software systems agreed quantitatively with less than 1% variability at steady state. Bifurcations across parameters were explored and figures and data reported here were developed in R, Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA) (2006), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA), and PowerPoint (Microsoft Corporation) (2003). Baseline parameter estimates as reported in Table 1 were used for all deterministic simulations and analyses unless otherwise noted. All analyses presented below were conducted with initial values of zero CFU in all patches except for feed (F0 = 10,000), to mimic an introduction of E. coli O157:H7 via feed into an otherwise sterile feedlot.

Stochastic simulations

We generated stochastic simulation data from a range of parameter values in order to evaluate the robustness of results derived from the deterministic analysis. We used Monte Carlo techniques to conduct a global sensitivity analysis (as reviewed in Helton and Davis, 2003) by generating 10,000 iterations. Parameter distributions were sampled using Latin Hypercube methods with 1000 equiprobable stratifications in each distribution (McKay et al., 1979). The simulation output was the steady state value for number of E. coli O157:H7 CFU shed per gram of cattle feces and was summarized with quartile box plots. For all analyses, model outputs reporting CFU per gram fecal material were calibrated to an average of 30 kg fecal production/(day/steer).

Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to test a two-sided hypothesis of correlation between each parameter and output values. Significance was set at the α = 0.05 level with Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis tests implemented (α corrected = 0.00217). Parameters influencing E. coli O157:H7 shedding rates in cattle were identified and are discussed below.

Model assessment

Model assessment and applicability were considered by comparing model outputs to population prevalences, a metric available in the E. coli O157:H7 animal agriculture literature. Real-world testing relates the number of CFU per fecal gram shed to animal level prevalence observations via imperfect culture tests. Similarly, we related the simulated number of CFU per gram of feces to pen-level prevalence estimates by the dose-dependent sensitivity of standard culture-based detection techniques (LeJeune et al., 2006). This modification allowed us to examine model results across organismal scales. The number of CFU per gram of substrate in environment, water, and feed were validated against literature data.

Results

Deterministic analysis

The model demonstrated two steady states—one with E. coli present and one with E. coli absent (comparable to the disease-free state in host-level models). The E. coli–absent steady state is unstable at equilibrium; the system is readily invaded by E. coli organisms. The positive stable point is robust to changes in the initial value of state variables. The solution to the baseline model revealed a dynamic invasion process where E. coli moved throughout the system and grew approximately exponentially toward an equilibrium state, as demonstrated in Fig. 2. All patches outside the host maintained viable E. coli populations and thus contributed directly to CFU observed in cattle feces through CFU ingestion and subsequent expulsion.

FIG. 2.
The number of E. coli O157:H7 colony-forming units (CFU; log10) observed in each patch (left panel) and the number of log10 CFU per gram of substrate in each patch (right panel).

Analysis of the deterministic form of the model revealed which environmental patches were influential for E. coli O157:H7 persistence. In the baseline model, the environmental patch dominated dynamics due to its relatively large size and slow turnover rate; environmental growth was necessary to maintain populations throughout the system, and served as the main reservoir for E. coli O157:H7 in the system. At equilibrium, the environmental patch acted as a reservoir for over 99.6% of the total E. coli population in the feedlot pen and accounted for over 98% of E. coli ingested by steers. Cattle shed 33 CFU/g feces at equilibrium.

In addition to the environmental patch, feed and animal growth rates and carrying capacities influenced systemwide shedding dynamics. High growth rates in the animal or feed patches can result in higher levels of shedding than the environmental compartment is able to produce alone (Fig. 3). However, the feed growth rates necessary to alter cattle shedding patterns are likely infeasible and discussed below. Changes in growth parameters in water do not meaningfully change the CFU per fecal gram excreted by cattle.

FIG. 3.
Each panel is the bifurcation diagram of the respective patch comparing the growth rate and log carrying capacity per gram (K) with the effect on the number of colony-forming units (CFU) of E. coli O157:H7 per gram of fecal matter (note change in x-axis ...

When we considered values from the parameter distributions that result in a reduction in the turnover rate of water (changes in rw, μw, Vw, cw, S), a qualitative change in system dynamics (bifurcation) was reached whereby water came to dominate the invasion and equilibrium dynamics in the system as a whole. Crossing this bifurcation resulted in an almost fourfold increase in the number of E. coli O157:H7 in a gram of steer feces from approximately 101 to 105 CFU/g feces and system-wide growth during the invasion phase was slaved to growth seen in water (Fig. 4). The parameters most influential to determining whether the system was at the higher or lower level of shedding were those which most strongly influenced the exit rate of organisms in the water patch: numbers of steer (S; due to the high volume of water consumption imposed) and size of the water trough (Vw). The ratio of parameters S:Vw determined which regime the system operated under with the threshold occurring at approximately 10 L water/steer (Fig. 5).

FIG. 4.
Steady state solutions for proportion of E. coli O157:H7 population in each patch with different capacities of water trough in liters.
FIG. 5.
Effect of varying the number of steers (S) in a pen and the capacity of the water trough (L) on the log10 colony-forming units (CFU) of E. coli O157:H7 observed per gram of fecal matter. Two clear planes emerge with a bifurcation resulting as the number ...

Stochastic analysis

The average number of CFU shed per gram of feces for 10,000 simulated feedlots is reported in Fig. 6. Approximately 44.5% of the simulations demonstrated fewer than 10 CFU/g feces; given the sensitivity of the standard culture techniques, this would translate to an apparent prevalence of less than 10%. Fewer than 100 CFU/g feces was shed in 63.8% of the simulations, while the remaining 36.2% had shedding loads greater than 100 CFU/g, which would translate to an apparent prevalence as high as 80%. Growth and population dynamics in the animal and environmental patches were shown to be most influential from the sensitivity analysis (Fig. 7); high levels of growth in cattle and environment and environmental carrying capacity were found to be correlated with high levels of fecal shedding. Death rates in steers and the environment and the number of steers per pen were shown to be negatively correlated with fecal shedding per gram of feces.

FIG. 6.
A quantile box plot (left panel) and frequency histogram (right panel) of log colony-forming units (CFU) of E. coli O157:H7 per gram of fecal matter at equilibrium in stochastic simulations. The dotted line in both panels (horizontal on left and vertical ...
FIG. 7.
Spearman's correlation (ρ) values indicating strength of the relationship between parameter and model output (colony-forming units [CFU] of E. coli O157:H7 per gram of feces at equilibrium) as determined by stochastic simulations. Only parameters ...

Discussion

Interpretation and assessment

The results of this study indicate that E. coli O157:H7 growth dynamics in water, the external environment, and cattle hosts are influential to the population size of E. coli O157:H7 in a feedlot pen. We have further demonstrated that previously observed growth rates of E. coli O157:H7 populations outside the cattle host are adequate to maintain high levels of E. coli O157:H7 in the feedlot without net replication in cattle hosts. In the absence of these processes, we identify the carrying capacity of the environmental compartment, net growth/death rates in cattle, and number of steers in a pen as particularly vulnerable points for E. coli O157:H7 control at endemic levels of contamination. We predict that interventions targeting these parameters, such as higher cleaning rates and administration of growth inhibition agents in the environment and water troughs or probiotic treatments in cattle, would prove particularly efficacious at reducing the load of E. coli on the farm, and subsequently the load introduced into the human food chain.

One of the most prominent results from this study is the ability of the model to maintain E. coli O157:H7 populations without net contributions from animal hosts. The predicted shedding levels compare favorably to those reported in the literature. For the deterministic baseline evaluation (assuming that all cows have the same shedding status and the number of bacteria shed per gram of feces), 33 CFU/g feces were observed that would lead to a prediction of approximately 20% prevalence observed in tested beef feedlot herds. This closely mirrors the recently observed prevalences in cross-sectional studies of feedlots. Elder and colleagues (2000) observed 28% prevalence in sampled feces of feedlot cattle, and Hussein (2007) found prevalence in beef feedlots ranged from estimates of 0.3–19.7% in a review of cross-sectional studies using fecal samples. Using most probable number analysis, Fegan and colleagues (2004) also demonstrated that the majority of cattle shedding E. coli O157:H7 (>90%) are shedding less than 500 CFU/g feces with 83% shedding less than 100 CFU/g. This has strong agreement with our deterministic and stochastic analyses that suggest most feedlots would support average cattle shedding at less than 100 CFU/g. Briefly, the E. coli O157:H7 predicted per gram of substrate in each compartment is also within the reported range of CFU in these media (Lynn et al., 1998; LeJeune et al., 2001a, 2001b; Jiang et al., 2002; Besser et al., 2003; Berry and Miller 2005; Amalaradjou et al., 2006), as would be expected given the logistic constraints imposed within each patch of the model.

Our work predicts that as the turnover rate of E. coli organisms in water (water available/steer ratio) is increased, shedding levels will cross a threshold that results in higher individual prevalence levels observed. Thus, we would predict pens housing smaller numbers of animals, while maintaining trough capacities, would experience higher loads of E. coli O157:H7 in the system, per gram of feces with higher observed prevalences; as more steers drink from a single water trough, turnover rates of water are faster than E. coli is able to reproduce, and thus contributes very few organisms to the microbial population. When water ingestion by cattle remains constant but water turnover rate is slow enough to allow for E. coli growth in water, cattle may be ingesting 107 CFU/mL of water at a rate of 45–60 L/day. This bifurcation explains the negative correlation of herd size with fecal shedding per gram predicted from the stochastic analysis above and may account for differences seen between low and high E. coli O157:H7 burden farms.

The effect of herd size observed in this study also appears to be in agreement with reported observations; Khaitsa and colleagues (2003) observed 10 pens with only 10 steers apiece and tested for O157:H7 for 19 weeks. The observed prevalence across all pens was as high as 80% with 6 of 10 pens demonstrating 100% prevalence in at least one weekly sampling in the study period. These observations closely align with our model predictions that animals would be shedding at quantities that would demonstrate approximately 80% apparent prevalence when housed in numbers comparable to those in the study by Khaitsa et al. (2003).

The results of the model analysis suggest that positive exponential growth greater than approximately one (ra−μa > 1) in cattle could also lead to substantially increased amounts of fecal E. coli shedding. The model is not formulated to allow for individual host heterogeneity; however, when a group of steers experiences high net growth (>1), the average CFU per fecal gram reflect values seen in the high or “super” shedding animals observed in previous studies (Omisakin et al., 2003; Fegan et al., 2004; Low et al., 2005). The fate of E. coli O157:H7 organisms ingested by cattle is not clear. Studies demonstrating that large oral doses of E. coli can lead to variable shedding on the order of weeks in cattle have been used as evidence that within-host replication and host–host transmission are driving forces in E. coli O157:H7 maintenance on the farm. However, these studies have been conducted on experimental farms which are under the influence of the extra-host growth dynamics explored in this study and thus do not offer strong evidence for or against pathogen transmission or within host colonization and growth. Little information is available empirically regarding the net growth or death influencing E. coli populations moving through the bovine gastrointestinal (GI) tract. It is reasonable to assume orally ingested bacteria experience high rates of death in cattle given the diverse and relatively harsh environments of the cattle GI tract that O157:H7 must pass through before being able to colonize at the recto-anal junction. However the extent of this turnover and potential for subsequent colonization and growth in the recto-anal junction are unclear. The ability of relatively few animals to support a high level of E. coli O157:H7 growth following colonization may account for the diversity and relatively small number of animals demonstrating “super shedding” levels of E. coli in feces. An extension of this work will introduce a mechanism to scale heterogeneity to the host level to attempt to account for these observed rare high-end shedders.

The deterministic analysis (Fig. 3) indicated that growth rates in feed could significantly impact the population dynamics of E. coli O157:H7 across the pen at high values. However, the values needed to affect dynamics in other patches are likely biologically infeasible; the exponential growth rate in feed has been reported as high as 2.5 per day (Lynn et al., 1998), but later attempts to replicate reproduction observed in the earlier study were unsuccessful (Besser et al., 2003). Thus, we defined a more modest growth rate in line with these observations as the baseline and conclude interventions targeted to reduce growth in feed will likely have little impact to the system's load of E. coli O157:H7. Feedbunks also likely violate the assumption of homogenous mixing more so than did the other more viscous compartments considered which could result in an overestimate of growth in feeds in our model. Depending on trough design and sedimentation rates, water may also violate assumptions of homogenous mixing.

Limitations

The model performs well in simulations and compares favorably to observed data; however, limitations are introduced by modeling the pathogen population directly. Firstly, most real world pathogen observations occur at the host scale. In order to relate the model to observed data a pathogen testing regimen needed to be parameterized and modeled. Similarly, a large amount of data is necessary to parameterize the population dynamics of the pathogen. Fortunately, a large amount of laboratory work has been conducted on E. coli O157:H7 and parameter estimates were generally available for this study. Further, each individual stochastic model simulation reported here, even when drawn from a random distribution, is itself a deterministic realization of a single theoretical feedlot. As a result, parameter values that allowed for a meaningful invasion of E. coli O157:H7 into the system settled at a positive population equilibrium and did not allow for a systemwide fadeout of bacteria. We are not aware of any longitudinal data demonstrating long-term trends in feedlot environment, water, or feed E. coli O157:H7 populations; however, observed cattle shedding patterns are notoriously transient and highly variable. Stochastic implementation at the host level may be able to produce fadeout dynamics in future extensions of this work. Similarly, a biologically meaningful change at the E. coli O157:H7 population scale in salient parameters could lead to a lower equilibrium population value. This could be induced by any number of intrinsic or external factors to the microbial population (e.g., weather unfavorable to growth).

Recommendations and conclusions

We developed pathogen-based methods to evaluate where meaningful replication, and thus propagation of E. coli O157:H7, is occurring on the beef feedlot. By moving toward evaluating the E. coli system at the microbial scale, we were able to robustly address the question of E. coli propagation and replication from its mechanistic underpinnings. The results of this analysis highlight the influence of water and environment in maintaining E. coli O157:H7 populations on the farm. Additionally, we were able to identify levels of replication that would be necessary for the animal host to be influential in the maintenance of the microbial organism. Given the results of this study, we recommend expanding research efforts to develop intervention strategies to target environmental growth and maintenance and limit the ability of cattle to harbor positive net E. coli O157:H7 replication. We identify the water available/cattle ratio as being particularly influential to high-level shedding patterns by affecting the turnover rate of water. Our model was able to demonstrate appropriate low- and high-level prevalences emergent from the mechanistic growth introduced in habitats outside the cattle host while reproducing realistic number of CFU per gram of feces, suggesting contact-based transmission and colonization of cattle is not solely responsible for E. coli O157:H7 propagation on feedlots, as is generally considered. Dynamics external to the host are likely impacting systemwide microbe propagation processes and thus affecting the load of E. coli O157:H7 presented to the human food chain.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank T. Besser, G. Loneragan, M. Baker, and J. VanDonkersgoed for providing expertise and commentary on feedlot parameter estimates. P. Ayscue was supported by a National Institutes of Health biomedical research training grant (T32RR18269-03).

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • Ahmadi BV. Frankena K. Turner J, et al. Effectiveness of simulated interventions in reducing the estimated prevalence of E-coli O157:H7 in lactating cows in dairy herds. Vet Res. 2007;38:755–771. [PubMed]
  • Amalaradjou MAR. Annamalai T. Marek P, et al. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle drinking water by sodium caprylate. J Food Prot. 2006;69:2248–2252. [PubMed]
  • Armstrong GL. Hollingsworth J. Morris JG. Emerging foodborne pathogens: Escherichia coli O157:H7 as a model of entry of a new pathogen into the food supply of the developed world. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:29–51. [PubMed]
  • Berry ED. Miller DN. Cattle feedlot soil moisture and manure content: II. Impact on Escherichia coli O157. J Environ Qual. 2005;34:656–663. [PubMed]
  • Besser T. LeJeune J. Rice D, et al. Prevention and control of Escherichia coli O157:H7. In: Torrence ME, editor; Isaacson RE, editor. Microbial Food Safety in Animal Agriculture: Current Topics. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press; 2003.
  • Besser TE. Hancock DD. Pritchett LC, et al. Duration of detection of fecal excretion of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:726–729. [PubMed]
  • Beuchat LR. Survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7 in bovine feces applied to lettuce and the effectiveness of chlorinated water as a disinfectant. J Food Prot. 1999;62:845–849. [PubMed]
  • Callaway TR. Anderson RC. Edrington TS, et al. What are we doing about Escherichia coli O157:H7 in cattle? J Anim Sci. 2004;82:E93–99. [PubMed]
  • Chapman PA. Siddons CA. Wright DJ, et al. Cattle as a source of verotoxigenic Escherichia-coli O157. Vet Rec. 1992;131:323–324. [PubMed]
  • Elder RO. Keen JE. Siragusa GR, et al. Correlation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides, and carcasses of beef cattle during processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:2999–3003. [PubMed]
  • Fegan N. Vanderlinde P. Higgs G, et al. The prevalence and concentration of Escherichia coli O157 in faeces of cattle from different production systems at slaughter. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:362–370. [PubMed]
  • Fukushima H. Hoshina K. Gomyoda M. Long-term survival of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26, O113, and O157 in bovine feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5177–5181. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hancock DD. Besser TE. Rice DH, et al. A longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157 in fourteen cattle herds. Epidemiol Infect. 1997;118:193–195. [PubMed]
  • Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 1998;396:41–49.
  • Harner JP. Murphy JP. Planning Cattle Feedlots. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University; 1998.
  • Helton JC. Davis FJ. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2003;81:23–69.
  • Hussein HS. Sakuma T. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: pre- and postharvest control measures to ensure safety of dairy cattle products. J Food Prot. 2005;68:199–207. [PubMed]
  • Hussein HS. Prevalence and pathogenicity of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli in beef cattle and their products. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:E63–E72. [PubMed]
  • Jiang XP. Morgan J. Doyle MP. Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in manure-amended soil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:2605–2609. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Khaitsa ML. Smith DR. Stoner JA, et al. Incidence, duration, and prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 fecal shedding by feedlot cattle during the finishing period. J Food Prot. 2003;66:1972–1977. [PubMed]
  • LeJeune JT. Besser TE. Hancock DD. Cattle water troughs as reservoirs of Escherichia coli O157. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001a;67:3053–3057. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • LeJeune JT. Besser TE. Merrill NL, et al. Livestock drinking water microbiology and the factors influencing the quality of drinking water offered to cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2001b;84:1856–1862. [PubMed]
  • LeJeune JT. Besser TE. Rice DH, et al. Longitudinal study of fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feedlot cattle: predominance and persistence of specific clonal types despite massive cattle population turnover. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:377–384. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • LeJeune JT. Hancock DD. Besser TE. Sensitivity of Escherichia coli O157 detection in bovine feces assessed by broth enrichment followed by immunomagnetic separation and direct plating methodologies. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:872–875. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • LeJeune JT. Wetzel AN. Preharvest control of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:E73–E80. [PubMed]
  • Liu WC. Jenkins C. Shaw DJ, et al. Modelling the epidemiology of Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups in young calves. Epidemiol Infect. 2005;133:449–458. [PubMed]
  • Liu WC. Shaw DJ. Matthews L, et al. Modelling the epidemiology and transmission of Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups O26 and O103 in two different calf cohorts. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135:1316–1323. [PubMed]
  • Low JC. McKendrick LJ. McKechnie C, et al. Rectal carriage of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157 in slaughtered cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:93–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lynn TV. Hancock DD. Besser TE, et al. The occurrence and replication of Escherichia coli in cattle feeds. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:1102–1108. [PubMed]
  • Maule A. Survival of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in soil, water and on surfaces. J Appl Microbiol. 2000;88:71S–78S. [PubMed]
  • McGee P. Bolton DJ. Sheridan JJ, et al. The survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in slurry from cattle fed different diets. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;32:152–155. [PubMed]
  • McKay MD. Beckman RJ. Conover WJ. Comparison of 3 methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 1979;21:239–245.
  • Mead PS. Slutsker L. Dietz V, et al. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:607–625. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morgan D. Newman CP. Hutchinson DN, et al. Verotoxin-producing Escherichia-coli O-157 infections associated with the consumption of yogurt. Epidemiol Infect. 1993;111:181–187. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Omisakin F. MacRae M. Ogden ID, et al. Concentration and prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces at slaughter. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:2444–2447. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sargeant JM. Amezcua MR. Rajic A, et al. Pre-harvest interventions to reduce the shedding of E-coli O157 in the faeces of weaned domestic ruminants: a systematic review. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2007;54:260–277. [PubMed]
  • Shere JA. Bartlett KJ. Kaspar CW. Longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157:H7 dissemination on four dairy farms in Wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:1390–1399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Taormina PJ. Beuchat LR. Behavior of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 on alfalfa sprouts during the sprouting process as influenced by treatments with various chemicals. J Food Prot. 1999;62:850–856. [PubMed]
  • Tarr PI. Escherichia-coli O157-H7—clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic aspects of human infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1–10. [PubMed]
  • Trevena WB. Hooper RS. Wray C, et al. Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 associated with companion animals. Vet Rec. 1996;138:400. [PubMed]
  • Turner J. Begon M. Bowers RG, et al. A model appropriate to the transmission of a human food-borne pathogen in a multigroup managed herd. Prev Vet Med. 2003;57:175–198. [PubMed]
  • Turner J. Bowers RG. Begon M, et al. A semi-stochastic model of the transmission of Escherichia coli O157 in a typical UK dairy herd: dynamics, sensitivity analysis and intervention/prevention strategies. J Theoret Biol. 2006;241:806–822. [PubMed]
  • Turner J. Bowers RG. Clancy D, et al. A network model of E. coli O157 transmission within a typical UK dairy herd: the effect of heterogeneity and clustering on the prevalence of infection. J Theoret Biol. 2008;254:45–54. [PubMed]
  • Van Donkersgoed J. Berg J. Potter A, et al. Environmental sources and transmission of Escherichia coli O 157 in feedlot cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal—Revue Veterinaire Canadienne. 2001;42:714–720. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Van Soest PJ. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1994.
  • Wang GD. Zhao T. Doyle MP. Fate of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in bovine feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:2567–2570. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wood JC. McKendrick IJ. Gettinby G. A simulation model to assess herd-level intervention strategies against E-coli O157. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135:749–764. [PubMed]

Articles from Foodborne Pathogens and Disease are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.