Genetic deletion or knock-down studies demonstrate that GLT-1 has a critical role in normal brain function (
Rothstein et al., 1996;
Tanaka et al., 1997). Over a decade ago, it was shown that astrocytes in culture express little (or no) GLT-1 protein, but that co-culturing with neurons induces astrocytic expression (
Gegelashvili et al., 1997;
Swanson et al., 1997;
Schlag et al., 1998). NF-κB signaling was linked to EGF- or dbcAMP-dependent regulation of GLT-1 by showing that inhibitors of proteosomal function block induction of GLT-1 in astrocyte cultures; this approach has obvious limitations related to the broad effects of inhibition of proteosomal function (
Zelenaia et al., 2000). Sitcheran and colleagues demonstrated that IκBα-SR, a dominant-negative construct of NF-κB signaling, blocks EGF-dependent activation of GLT-1 expression in a human astroglioma (
Sitcheran et al., 2005). Using either pharmacological approaches or this dominant-negative construct, NF-κB signaling has been linked to ceftriaxone-, brain-derived neurotrophic factor-, or β-amyloid-dependent up-regulation of GLT-1 (
Rodriguez-Kern et al., 2003;
Lee et al., 2008). NF-κB signaling has also been linked to amitriptyline-dependent up-regulation of GLT-1
in vivo (
Tai et al., 2008).
In spite of these advances, it is not known if NF-κB signaling might contribute to neuron-dependent induction of GLT-1. Using a relatively simple strategy, we provide several lines of evidence that activation of NF-κB signaling in astrocytes contributes to this neuron-dependent transcriptional activation of GLT-1 through an interaction of NF-κB subunits with specific sites in the GLT-1 promoter. First, when an NF-κB reporter construct is specifically introduced into astrocytes, over-layering neurons increases reporter activity. Second, specific expression of dominant-negative inhibitors of NF-κB signaling in astrocytes attenuates neuron-dependent induction of eGFP. Third, exogenous expression of p65 and/or p50 increases eGFP expression in astrocytes prepared from the BAC GLT-1 eGFP transgenic mice and also increases DHK-sensitive (GLT-1-mediated) transport activity in astrocytes. Forth, mutation of putative NF-κB binding sites in a GLT-1 promoter abolishes neuron-dependent activation of a GLT-1 promoter reporter. Finally, binding of p50 and p65 to these specific sites was detected both
in vitro and
in vivo. Together these studies strongly suggest that the effects of NF-κB are dependent upon a direct interaction with elements in the GLT-1 promoter rather indirect through transcriptional regulation of other trans factors. Consistent with earlier finding that link glutamatergic signaling to induction of GLT-1 (
Gegelashvili et al., 1996;
Yang et al., 2009), glutamate activates nuclear translocation of p50 and p65 in primary astrocytes (
Caccamo et al., 2005). The fact that induction of eGFP expression is not completely blocked by dominant-negative inhibitors that completely block NF-κB signaling, strongly suggests that other signals also contribute to neuronal induction of GLT-1, but this was not explored.
As was observed previously (
Sitcheran et al., 2005), we found that EGF-dependent induction of GLT-1 was blocked by dominant-negative inhibitors of NF-κB signaling. Also in agreement with this study, we found that mutation of the putative NF-κB binding site at −583 blocked EGF-dependent activation of a GLT-1 promoter reporter. We report that mutation of the NF-κB binding site at −251 also abolishes EGF-dependent activation of a GLT-1 promoter reporter. This same group showed that ceftriaxone-dependent induction of GLT-1 was dependent upon activation of NF-κB signaling and promoter reporter activation was blocked by mutation of the NF-κB binding site at −272 (
Lee et al., 2008). We found that neuron-dependent activation of the promoter reporter was abolished by mutation of sites at either −583 or −251 but not −272, similar to that observed with EGF. Interestingly, we found that p50- but not p65-dependent activation of the promoter was abolished by mutation of the −272 NF-κB binding site. We also found evidence that p50 interact with the site at −272, but that p65 does not. This contradicts an earlier study that suggests that p65 can interact with the site at −272 (
Lee et al., 2008). The reason for this discrepancy is not clear at this time, but it is possible that the differences are related to the different model systems used for these analyses. Regardless, these data suggest that different NF-κB binding sites in the GLT-1 promoter are activated by different signals, ceftriaxone activating one of these signaling pathways and neurons/EGF activating a distinct pathway. This would not be unprecedented, as different stimuli have been shown to activate translocation of different NF-κB dimers in the same cellular system (
Tong et al., 2004). It should also be noted that tumor necrosis factor-α down-regulates GLT-1 expression by a pathway dependent upon n-myc and NF-κB activation utilizing a distinct signaling pathway (
Sitcheran et al., 2005).
Until recently essentially nothing was known about the specific transcriptional mechanisms that contribute to neuron-dependent induction of GLT-1. We recently demonstrated that mutation of a site ~680 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site also abolished neuron-dependent activation of the 958bp GLT-1 promoter fragment (
Yang et al., 2009). In this study, Kappa B-motif binding phosphoprotein (KBBP) was found to interact with the site ~680 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site and exogenous expression of KBBP in astrocytes increased GLT-1 expression. As was observed with inhibition of NF-κB signaling, impairing KBBP function (with shRNA interference) attenuated, but did not abolish induction of GLT-1 (or eGFP). In this same study, we also showed that mutation of the −583 site abolished neuron-dependent activation of this promoter reporter (see , mutant 3). Regrettably, in this earlier study, we included text that indicated that mutation of NF-κB binding sites had no dramatic influence on neuron-stimulated promoter activation. In spite of this error in the text of the earlier study, we conclude that mutation of any one of three different sites within this region is sufficient to abolish neuron-dependent activation. In future experiments, it will be interesting to study the inter-dependence of these protein interactions with the GLT-1 promoter.
NF-κB signaling was originally linked to a variety of pathologic conditions including inflammation, infection, injury and stress (
Nonaka et al., 1999;
Schwaninger et al., 1999;
Yu et al., 1999;
Mattson and Camandola, 2001). In fact, there is evidence that NF-κB signaling contributes to development and learning/memory (for review, see
Kaltschmidt and Kaltschmidt, 2009). Although frequently thought of as a
transient transcriptional activator, transgenic lines of mice engineered to express β-galactosidase under the control of a NF-κB promoter demonstrates constitutive activation in the brain, particularly neurons (for review, see
Kaltschmidt and Kaltschmidt, 2009). All of the NF-κB family members have been observed in the CNS, but the most commonly active complexes are p50/p50 homodimers and p50/p65 heterodimers (
Naumann and Scheidereit, 1994;
Meffert et al., 2003). In the present study, both p50 and p65 have been linked to GLT-1 promoter regions required for neuron-induced transcription. Mice genetically deleted of either p50 or p65 have been described. Knock-out of p65 results in death during embryogenesis (
Beg et al., 1995;
Meffert et al., 2003); therefore, it is not possible to determine if they express a similar phenotype to that observed in GLT-1 knock-outs, including seizures and susceptibility to ischemic insults (
Tanaka et al., 1997). Mice deleted of p50 have not been examined for GLT-1 expression, but the fact that these animals survive and appear relatively normal in adulthood (
Denis-Donini et al., 2008), suggests that subunits other than p50 can support expression of GLT-1.
In summary, both
in vitro and
in vivo studies strongly suggest that astrocytic GLT-1 expression is dynamically regulated by neurons/neuronal activity (see introduction). Furthermore, decreases in GLT-1 expression are observed in several neurodegenerative disorders (for review, see
Sheldon and Robinson, 2007). The identification of transcriptional events involved in regulation of GLT-1 expression may lead to the development of therapeutic strategies to limit that loss of GLT-1 and neurodegeneration.