This is the second patient with a T188R
PRNP mutation described in the literature and the first with autopsy-proven CJD. He presented with a subacute, progressive dementia affecting behavior, memory, executive function, and language, but largely sparing his visuospatial and motor function. He did not meet possible or probable sCJD criteria according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (i.e. dementia plus 2 of the following: myoclonus, pyramidal/extrapyramidal signs, visual/cerebellar signs, akinetic mutism and typical EEG or CSF 14-3-3 if duration less than 2 y [
15,
16]), nor new European possible or probable sCJD criteria, (same as WHO, but allowing the use of MRI) (
17). He did meet UCSF probable sCJD criteria (
18) due to his rapid dementia, mild cerebellar signs and higher focal cortical sign of apraxia, in addition to DWI/ADC MRI findings (
19). The patient presented with behavioral signs including eating habit changes, poor judgment, lack of insight, disinhibition, loss of disgust, decline in personal hygiene in association with memory and executive impairments. He did not meet Neary criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal lobar degeneration because of the rapid progression of his symptoms (
20). The other reported patient with the same mutation was a 66-year-old old who presented with progressive visual impairment followed several months later by progressive dementia and mild ataxia (
2,
5,
21), a clinical picture different from our case.
The neuropathology examination demonstrated spongiform changes consisting of intracellular vacuolation (especially in dendrites) in numerous brain regions. There were additional status spongiosus-like changes with marked neuronal loss and reactive gliosis and extracellular slit-like spaces in the inferior temporal gyrus. This is a late finding suggesting severe disease and was also described along with ballooned neurons in the T188K case (
5). The PrP
Sc staining in our case, however, differed from what was described in the T188K case in that the pattern was patchy and plaque-like, in addition to a synaptic pattern (
5).
Although sCJD usually displays characteristic MRI findings (restricted diffusion greater in the cerebral cortex and/or basal ganglia/thalamus), genetic prion diseases are less consistently associated with these MRI findings. Whereas mutations such as V180I, E200K, T183A, and I210V can show brain MRI findings similar to sCJD (
22-
24), many
PRNP mutation diseases do not show these characteristic features (
19). In 2 of 4 T188K cases there were MRI findings consistent with sCJD, i.e. 1 with T2-hyperintensity in the striatum and the other with diffusion abnormalities in the cortex. It is not known whether the other T188 cases had the appropriate FLAIR, DWI and ADC sequence studies performed (
17,
19). Our patient had some subtle DWI/ADC MRI features that are seen in sCJD (
19), but there was also marked cortical atrophy. The EEG in our patient only demonstrated diffuse slowing, unlike the previously reported T188R patient who showed typical periodic sharp-wave complexes (PSWCs) on EEG examination. This might be due to our assessment having been done at an earlier time point in the disease course; PSWCs in sCJD are usually a later finding (
25).
The previous T188R patient had no known family history of dementing illnesses, but her father had succumbed to pleuritis at age 31 years.
PRNP testing revealed that our patient’s father and 1 sibling, both of whom are asymptomatic, have the same T188R mutation. Some
PRNP mutations exhibit reduced penetrance, as suggested by the proportion of genetic CJD cases (5%–88%, depending on the mutation), with a negative family history (
26,
27). Our findings suggest either reduced penetrance with the T188R mutation or that the pathogenic effect depends on additional factors (
28,
29). Codon 129 polymorphism is known to exert an influential role in both sporadic and genetic prion disease (
30). In view of the fact that our patient’s father is also MV and is still unaffected at age 80 years, it is unclear what the influential factor is in this case. Furthermore, the previously described T188R case was VV (
5), i.e. different from our patient. It also appears that the T188K mutation is not fully penetrant because at least one 79-year-old person with the mutation did not show any evidence of disease (
5).
There are several arguments that strongly support a pathogenic role for T188R and T188K mutations. The T188K mutation was observed in 4 CJD patients that were confirmed pathologically in one case. None of 735 healthy controls screened carried these mutations. Moreover, threonine at codon 188 of
PRNP is highly conserved throughout all mammals, indicating that these mutations are likely to have a dramatic effect on the function of the prion protein (
31,
32). Codon 188 is located in the C-terminal half of the second α-helix, a highly structured part of the protein; the substitution of threonine for a highly basic amino acid such as arginine (T188R) or lysine (T188K) would result in structural destabilization (
5). Cell culture studies have demonstrated that PrP T188R mutants had enhanced resistance to proteinase K (
33). Curiously, 1 patient with a T188A mutation had all of the pathological and clinical features of prion disease, except that his PrP
Sc immunohistochemistry was negative (
34). This might be explained by T188A causing a prionopathy with largely protease sensitive PrP
Sc.
The present case further supports the pathogenicity and adds to our clinical, radiological and pathological understanding of the T188
PRNP mutation. It also illustrates that certain mutations may present with very different clinical phenotypes. Lastly, our case emphasizes the importance of testing for genetic prion disease in any patient presenting with atypical dementia, such as early onset dementia, even in the absence of a positive family history (
35).